I totally just heard about this the other day. Wonder if it'll blow by like nothing like y2k or actually have bad effects. From what I read the choices are watch everything die, convince closed source proprietary apps to restart development and switch to 64 bit, or force it to be unsigned and break many functions that add or subtract time. Is this right?
Thankfully such things are being done by engineers and scientists and not politicians.
If they was made by politicians they would wait until the last day to recognize it and start acting like they was really busy trying to solve it at 23:45 and then they would pass the deadline.
I know my artificial sweeteners quite well. Still consume them though I would do better without them.
The allergic part I can't comment on. Aspartame I don't notice at all.
As someone else have pointed out agave isn't a low calorie alternative. Wikipedia mention 92% fructose and 8% glucose for the hydrolysed product.
"But avoiding sugars as a method to lose weight is a myth..."
You're just making a joke of yourself. Putting more energy in than out make you store the additional energy, and viceversa. The issue with the sugars though isn't as much that they make you fat (in the case of fructose it actually do have additional negative effects compared to glucose or starches but anyway) as in that they are deficient of all nutrients and as such completely useless. If all you eat is 1500 kcal of sugar per day you won't get fat but it's not a healthy diet and it's a complete failure regardless. But also likely easier to over eat / consume your daily food intake with sugar rich products / especially drinks because they are so easy to consume / eat. It's harder to eat 3000 kcal of kale.
"natural sugar is part of that" bs.
"The real problem is not getting enough fat (and substituting carbohydrates for the fat intake)"
I never said that. I said they likely was afraid of artificial sweeteners. As in they enjoy all this sweet threats but then also get sugar filled sodas on top of it all for even more sugar, fructose and higher calorie intake whereas an artificially sweetened soda would at least not had contributed to their massive energy intake.
I don't get why you brought fat into anything. All I said was that they was fat.
A fat olympic lifter at the gym also didn't eat any pasta or potatoes (or whatever) with his food made of vegetables and meat because he thought it was necessary to skip that to be able to eat enough of the rest or whatever.
And he likely thought that was a good meal.
And it is.
The thing is just that he also bought a jar of ice cream and bought the 1 kg bags of winegums because they was cheaper than the 250 gram bags or whatever and eat that after his workout.
Maybe he felt the need for that energy but that explains why he can't stomach the potatoes or pasta and have no need for those calories but he's already eaten a lot more of much shittier food.
There's a difference in the size of FOOD portions and everything inbetween to.
Some people complain how others can eat so much and others complain that they eat a lot but still doesn't gain weight but for instance over at the university there's a fat couple and they can be eating like a chocolate bar and then go buy some potato chips and then go buy yet something else. They are likely afraid of artificial sweeteners to and go for the "good natural stuff!"
Apple sue nearly every manufacturer over generic shapes and actions, and the government just give a green light for dumb intellectual property to be registered.
Samsung sue Apple over actual inventions, and they get investigated.
This world is going to the shits.
(yes I know Samsung's patents were dubious because of being FRAND, and in an ideal world they shouldn't have used them. But in an ideal world they shouldn't have had to counter sue because Apple generic design patents).
I agree. This is what patents are for after all. Why only have shitty patents for things not important and punish people who've got the real stuff? Make sense? Remove them already.
Sure it's not 50% of the market and Nokia don't sell only Windows Phones yet but anyway.
I'd also like a source for the claim someone made about how N9 sold better than the Windows Phones. Care to share some sales figures for N9 vs Lumia 920 for the first weeks?
You have a wifi keyboard and mouse? Your camera has wifi? Your printer has wifi? Your scanner?
No I don't. But it could be used for say storage by using a wireless NAS.
And there's cameras with WiFi.
And there's phones with WiFi.
And there's printers with WiFi.
And who knows maybe there's those multi-functionality devices with scanners with WiFi to.
The suggestion wasn't to use either. I brought up options. For instance there exist keyboards and mice with bluetooth and if the device got bluetooth support then you wouldn't need USB for those. Whatever it have bluetooth or not I have no idea, I didn't looked into it much.
And yeah. I assume that to do banking business in Sweden you have to follow Swedish laws. And the "finance inspection" looks after the market looking for people who don't.
What? It's not like the pirate party decide the outcome.
What they have done is of course to ask Finansinspektionen to investigate it and is the organization which look after the financial markets in Sweden. I assume the actual charges will go from someone with the authority to do so. Not from the Pirate party.
cease to produce anything of value in their industry
Bullshit. In the case of Apple sure it's often software and may be more or less easy to come up with but obviously it "got value" for the industry even in that case. Both for Apple and for the opponents.
Nokia and Ericsson likely still come up with new things and have made innovated others with research done from their own pockets so nothing weird with that (though you could argue they did that to earn money back then selling their products and already have. But obviously it cost more to do research than not doing it and if someone can just steal your work in that area then that become pretty unfair.
I doubt any of Nokia, Ericsson or Apple has given up on future products either.
That's very off-topic but I don't even own a smartphone:)
I think they are expensive. I likely should get a used one either simple and cheap or one of the latest ones but cheaper than retail (and keep it up to date for longer, as I see things phones like the Galaxy Gio haven't fallen much or at all in price the last 1-1.5 years so getting an old phone and hope for something better to show up for a good price somewhat sooner may not be a path to success.)
I've thought about getting a used S III and was rather close to getting a cheap S III LTE which someone nearby sold (don't ask me why at that price) but the issue for me is that the Nexus 4 in U.S. and parts of the Europe got such an awesome price and better spec (though it supposedly run hot) and may be more future proof. It doesn't list at those prices in Sweden as of now but I have no idea whatever we will have similar prices or ability to get it for similar prices from further down in Europe or if we are screwed. For 4500 SEK for a new Nexus 4 I'd rather pick a "used or opened but new" S III LTE for 2700 SEK as this one was listed for. For 2700-3000 SEK for both however the Nexus 4 will be faster, don't have a PenTile screen, got a good looking though likely easier breakable back side.
The S III got some other advantages though, eventually the S III software do some good things stock Android doesn't. AMOLED is nice to (Nexus 4 got IPS though) but what's more interesting I suppose is the runs hot issue of the Nexus 4 and user replacable battery and microSD-card slot on the S III. Over here the regular S III "only" got 1 GB of RAM which would imho make it seem less future proof but the LTE model got 2 GB so that solve that issue.
To be able to get root as a user is just an advantage to me. However I suppose that might mean user installed applications may also be able to get root access.
I just wrote it like that to not write christians since there's different kinds. Whatever. Biblical like text, speech, songs or imagination based on little true evidence believers then.
(Guess it's more convenient if it could handle it and maybe it can't be scripted or something such but I found that funny regardless and you can't take that away from me!)
Slashdot Mirror
Because it's so hard to store hash,MD5 or hash,SHA3 or whatever in two fields in a database.
suggesting vi without giving equal time to emacs? you trying to start a flame war?
No, precisely as you suggested he never mentioned emacs. So there's no chance for a flame war. Well. Until your comment was posted that was =P
It's just that when your reference storage medium changes value it's not as obvious, because you still have the same number of it.
... and I doubt there has been a significant drop in gold production or need industrial use:
http://goldprice.org/gold-price-history.html#36_year_gold_price
So that means? =P
Maybe pass is the wrong word to use?
Maybe I should say fail instead. I mean go over the deadline.
I totally just heard about this the other day. Wonder if it'll blow by like nothing like y2k or actually have bad effects. From what I read the choices are watch everything die, convince closed source proprietary apps to restart development and switch to 64 bit, or force it to be unsigned and break many functions that add or subtract time. Is this right?
Thankfully such things are being done by engineers and scientists and not politicians.
If they was made by politicians they would wait until the last day to recognize it and start acting like they was really busy trying to solve it at 23:45 and then they would pass the deadline.
I know my artificial sweeteners quite well. Still consume them though I would do better without them.
The allergic part I can't comment on. Aspartame I don't notice at all.
As someone else have pointed out agave isn't a low calorie alternative. Wikipedia mention 92% fructose and 8% glucose for the hydrolysed product.
"But avoiding sugars as a method to lose weight is a myth..."
You're just making a joke of yourself. Putting more energy in than out make you store the additional energy, and viceversa. The issue with the sugars though isn't as much that they make you fat (in the case of fructose it actually do have additional negative effects compared to glucose or starches but anyway) as in that they are deficient of all nutrients and as such completely useless. If all you eat is 1500 kcal of sugar per day you won't get fat but it's not a healthy diet and it's a complete failure regardless. But also likely easier to over eat / consume your daily food intake with sugar rich products / especially drinks because they are so easy to consume / eat. It's harder to eat 3000 kcal of kale.
"natural sugar is part of that" bs.
"The real problem is not getting enough fat (and substituting carbohydrates for the fat intake)"
I never said that. I said they likely was afraid of artificial sweeteners. As in they enjoy all this sweet threats but then also get sugar filled sodas on top of it all for even more sugar, fructose and higher calorie intake whereas an artificially sweetened soda would at least not had contributed to their massive energy intake.
I don't get why you brought fat into anything. All I said was that they was fat.
A fat olympic lifter at the gym also didn't eat any pasta or potatoes (or whatever) with his food made of vegetables and meat because he thought it was necessary to skip that to be able to eat enough of the rest or whatever.
And he likely thought that was a good meal.
And it is.
The thing is just that he also bought a jar of ice cream and bought the 1 kg bags of winegums because they was cheaper than the 250 gram bags or whatever and eat that after his workout.
Maybe he felt the need for that energy but that explains why he can't stomach the potatoes or pasta and have no need for those calories but he's already eaten a lot more of much shittier food.
There's a difference in the size of FOOD portions and everything inbetween to.
Some people complain how others can eat so much and others complain that they eat a lot but still doesn't gain weight but for instance over at the university there's a fat couple and they can be eating like a chocolate bar and then go buy some potato chips and then go buy yet something else. They are likely afraid of artificial sweeteners to and go for the "good natural stuff!"
And they are fat.
I don't see what your first part got to do with either of his comment or the /. entry.
Why does the video have a repeating "ling-ling-ling" sound in it? Also all that noice + 35 minutes long.
There's an option for everything.
How do I turn on Clippy?
s/it/them
Comment on OSnews:
http://www.osnews.com/thread?546002
Laurence:
Apple sue nearly every manufacturer over generic shapes and actions, and the government just give a green light for dumb intellectual property to be registered.
Samsung sue Apple over actual inventions, and they get investigated.
This world is going to the shits.
(yes I know Samsung's patents were dubious because of being FRAND, and in an ideal world they shouldn't have used them. But in an ideal world they shouldn't have had to counter sue because Apple generic design patents).
I agree. This is what patents are for after all. Why only have shitty patents for things not important and punish people who've got the real stuff? Make sense? Remove them already.
"Patents are important! Unless they are for stuff which matters!"
We can't have patents on those can we?
Just stop all patents or accept the stupidity of it.
Thing is some people do want a Windows Phone.
So you fail.
Sure it's not 50% of the market and Nokia don't sell only Windows Phones yet but anyway.
I'd also like a source for the claim someone made about how N9 sold better than the Windows Phones. Care to share some sales figures for N9 vs Lumia 920 for the first weeks?
You have a wifi keyboard and mouse? Your camera has wifi? Your printer has wifi? Your scanner?
No I don't. But it could be used for say storage by using a wireless NAS.
And there's cameras with WiFi.
And there's phones with WiFi.
And there's printers with WiFi.
And who knows maybe there's those multi-functionality devices with scanners with WiFi to.
The suggestion wasn't to use either. I brought up options. For instance there exist keyboards and mice with bluetooth and if the device got bluetooth support then you wouldn't need USB for those. Whatever it have bluetooth or not I have no idea, I didn't looked into it much.
And yeah. I assume that to do banking business in Sweden you have to follow Swedish laws. And the "finance inspection" looks after the market looking for people who don't.
What? It's not like the pirate party decide the outcome.
What they have done is of course to ask Finansinspektionen to investigate it and is the organization which look after the financial markets in Sweden. I assume the actual charges will go from someone with the authority to do so. Not from the Pirate party.
USB hub? Bluetooth? WiFi?
A method for collective effort and collective knowledge database and collective rights could also be made.
As of now that's not how things work and some companies spend a lot of money to develop and evolve within their fields.
Nokia, Ericsson, and dare I say it, Apple
snip
cease to produce anything of value in their industry
Bullshit. In the case of Apple sure it's often software and may be more or less easy to come up with but obviously it "got value" for the industry even in that case. Both for Apple and for the opponents.
Nokia and Ericsson likely still come up with new things and have made innovated others with research done from their own pockets so nothing weird with that (though you could argue they did that to earn money back then selling their products and already have. But obviously it cost more to do research than not doing it and if someone can just steal your work in that area then that become pretty unfair.
I doubt any of Nokia, Ericsson or Apple has given up on future products either.
Maybe yours is better?
That's very off-topic but I don't even own a smartphone :)
I think they are expensive. I likely should get a used one either simple and cheap or one of the latest ones but cheaper than retail (and keep it up to date for longer, as I see things phones like the Galaxy Gio haven't fallen much or at all in price the last 1-1.5 years so getting an old phone and hope for something better to show up for a good price somewhat sooner may not be a path to success.)
I've thought about getting a used S III and was rather close to getting a cheap S III LTE which someone nearby sold (don't ask me why at that price) but the issue for me is that the Nexus 4 in U.S. and parts of the Europe got such an awesome price and better spec (though it supposedly run hot) and may be more future proof. It doesn't list at those prices in Sweden as of now but I have no idea whatever we will have similar prices or ability to get it for similar prices from further down in Europe or if we are screwed. For 4500 SEK for a new Nexus 4 I'd rather pick a "used or opened but new" S III LTE for 2700 SEK as this one was listed for. For 2700-3000 SEK for both however the Nexus 4 will be faster, don't have a PenTile screen, got a good looking though likely easier breakable back side.
The S III got some other advantages though, eventually the S III software do some good things stock Android doesn't. AMOLED is nice to (Nexus 4 got IPS though) but what's more interesting I suppose is the runs hot issue of the Nexus 4 and user replacable battery and microSD-card slot on the S III. Over here the regular S III "only" got 1 GB of RAM which would imho make it seem less future proof but the LTE model got 2 GB so that solve that issue.
To be able to get root as a user is just an advantage to me. However I suppose that might mean user installed applications may also be able to get root access.
Billy Gates wrote:
Does that mean I can finally root and upgrade my crappy Galaxy S1 with Android 2.1 yet? Fucking AT&T
You still prefer that one over your Lumia 920?
I just wrote it like that to not write christians since there's different kinds. Whatever. Biblical like text, speech, songs or imagination based on little true evidence believers then.
In that case, we'd want to do a variety of things to be convinced that it is correct. I can imagine a couple of things to do
Meanwhile for the bible readers:
* Am I alive? Check.
* Is there a day and night? Yes.
* Do I have no freaking clue how all this happened? No.
Seem legit!
and maxima can't use degrees, only radians
WAY TO GO MATH STUDENT!! :D
(Guess it's more convenient if it could handle it and maybe it can't be scripted or something such but I found that funny regardless and you can't take that away from me!)