It's just feel weird seeing how the EU act as such. Here in Sweden we would of course never do anything such but rather be the first one to volunteer to get butt raped by as many as possible because someone has to be the most extreme and that got to be us... and in three days we'll have the worlds highest taxes on gasoline. Just a continuation of our long tradition of being the most retarded progressives of the planet.
I'm totally up for discussing things but to begin with anyone of them got no right to complain for the rules of "discussion" and how to treat others in it themselves. They have never been interested in it.
Secondly regardless of what they want it should simply be denied on the ground of human freedom and right to not give a shit and not be bothered by them.
To be fair it would likely be an off-the shelf regular white shirt with some almost forgotten print because now Apple is all about key-chains instead!;D
Sweden and Germany rank substantially better at press freedoms than the US:
Yeah, if the rater are a communist rather than a "nazi" or "white supremacist."
Also I never claimed the freedom of press was very bad in Sweden. I kinda made fun of the idea of trusting the media in Sweden.
Just because the media could tell the truth and report negative stories and information about immigration doesn't mean they actually do that. They are free to choose the perspective they want to tell and what data or claims they want to do. They are even allowed to lie. That's not illegal. But it make people trust you less.
Media in Sweden shouldn't be trusted. But no, it's not that they HAVE to lie or tell dishonest stories. They just do that anyhow.
Regardless do accept that 0.25% of Swedish GDP go to fund public service which is the channel which in general has had the most trust and which is basically only run by socialists and environmentalists/libtards. Beyond that a smaller amount is given as support for the press but they want to increase that and set up a group of media companies/representators whom themselves are supposed to figure out who will get the money or not and as you can imagine those people will decide to support their own rather than those with a different opinion. And then we have private social media and search giants with their agenda deciding which opinions they let through and a climate where you definitely risk losing your job if the left go after you because you have the wrong opinion and that kinda effectively shut the voice of normal people down.
Sweden isn't far off from North Korea, Turkey, Iran and Russia. The government may not do it but they are definitely considering it and their allies in the press and social media do it regardless, and where it's not done the activist communists make sure it get done anyway.
Also do accept that the Swedish government decided that it wouldn't be good if it by itself went after the people trying to shut them down for raising their opinions. Instead they decided it would be better if third parties did that and as a result they ARE financing third parties which do exactly that.
So "anti hate" and "anti racist" groups who act to shut people down get public funding to act. As such the government can still kinda claim they do allow it and that Sweden is a democracy and that we've got whatever freedoms and not too harsh laws but that's definitely not the case. Sweden is a democrature and the media is lying and fooling people.
You do realize I wasn't very seriously and mostly just joking about mac people? Especially since they may feel they are more professional because they bought a more expensive mac. As for the 18 cores you can easily get it in a Windows PC too so.. whatever.
The problem with that is of course that we may want the functionality of the software we've found. And atleast Windows haven't before offered a central repository. And for the same of competition we may not want one.
Here in Sweden we have a 4% border for parties so to get someone new in 4+% of the voters must support that meaning it would be far harder to get someone in than just giving that person 1/349 of the votes to get one place in the parliament.
Also for the established parties while theoretically you are allowed to vote for a candidate if you don't like their own choices they do lock down their name lists meaning you can't vote for someone they haven't chosen that you can vote for (and even if it was allowed and you did of course enough people would have to to get that person on top of someone. I don't know if a vote without crossing a specific candidate count as a vote on the top one on the list or just on no-one specific.
Also even if we vote for parties they together form their government and our government is usually not single majority party or a combination of the two largest parties (or even better that we skipped having a government whatsoever and let whole parliament vote, or better yet the actual people rather than having representatives, or better yet abandoned collective rule to liberate all individuals to rule themselves) meaning the parties themselves actually decide who will be the government and the government will likely be a group of parties which think similar rather than a group representing the majority of the people or one having a distribution like what the people voted on.
Also in Sweden after the last election in the "December agreement" in 2014 because they didn't liked the influence of the Sweden democrats in the parliament they agreed that the largest block would be allowed to rule and get a budget through and the other block wouldn't vote on their own one risking the Sweden democrats also supported that, thereby setting up a scenario where the votes on the Sweden democrats didn't matter and the parliament was just like if only the other parties existed. Similarly when they are discussing various issues the Sweden democrats isn't allowed to participate. That agreement finally was publicly ended because it could make people feel they aren't living in a democracy! Which we aren't. But like even now when the more socialist people wanted to raise the tax rate on the investment savings account the people who are more against taxes and I guess wouldn't propose that themselves rather than vote no which the Sweden democrats did they simply abstained and hence it passed meaning our actual minority government got things their way even though I assume the majority of the parliament would actually be against it but since the Sweden democrats doesn't count in the democrature of Sweden they pretended the majority was for it and there was nothing which could be done so it was passed.
So yeah. Our constitution may say that the government is our representatives and that all power comes from the people. But it's not the people who decide. The people are just tools to validate their own authority. Sweden is ruled from above and the people are lectured and taught what to think, vote and do. Not the other way around.
For America though I wouldn't call it nationalism but rather patriotism because the USA is a mixed country. I assume what you like there is the country not necessarily "your people."
Another thing to consider is that the USA is one of very few countries which tax their citizens abroad or whatever so that may make it less interesting for someone from the USA to work abroad whereas many from other countries wouldn't mind working in the USA.
And then we have the good socialist: "Who would you rather trust? The government or the companies?"
My first reaction now was "well, at-least I can choose the company (I deal with)", then again I got reminded some people think that's also true for the government. However I don't feel like _I_ can choose it. Best case scenario _WE_ can but I don't see the opt out option.
If I don't like Facebook, which I don't, at-least I don't have to use it. As for cookies and various tracking if nothing else there's ways to try to avoid that.
So. What are we talking about here? A playboy bunny butt fucks me with a strap on for 1 BTC? Reverse action to and I still got to keep the BTC? I fail to see the problem. Where do I sign up?
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah I totally expect it from the US.
It's just feel weird seeing how the EU act as such. Here in Sweden we would of course never do anything such but rather be the first one to volunteer to get butt raped by as many as possible because someone has to be the most extreme and that got to be us. .. and in three days we'll have the worlds highest taxes on gasoline. Just a continuation of our long tradition of being the most retarded progressives of the planet.
I'm totally up for discussing things but to begin with anyone of them got no right to complain for the rules of "discussion" and how to treat others in it themselves. They have never been interested in it.
Secondly regardless of what they want it should simply be denied on the ground of human freedom and right to not give a shit and not be bothered by them.
But if no-one was really using it I assume it would had been a 125 gram burger, or two 75 gram, or one 100 gram or whatever.
And the gorilla would be 400 kg or extinct.
To be fair it would likely be an off-the shelf regular white shirt with some almost forgotten print because now Apple is all about key-chains instead! ;D
Well we got Muslims and Africans now.
We don't need the last bastion of freedom, Europeans and the west!
Sweden and Germany rank substantially better at press freedoms than the US:
Yeah, if the rater are a communist rather than a "nazi" or "white supremacist."
Also I never claimed the freedom of press was very bad in Sweden. I kinda made fun of the idea of trusting the media in Sweden.
Just because the media could tell the truth and report negative stories and information about immigration doesn't mean they actually do that. They are free to choose the perspective they want to tell and what data or claims they want to do. They are even allowed to lie. That's not illegal. But it make people trust you less.
Media in Sweden shouldn't be trusted. But no, it's not that they HAVE to lie or tell dishonest stories. They just do that anyhow.
Regardless do accept that 0.25% of Swedish GDP go to fund public service which is the channel which in general has had the most trust and which is basically only run by socialists and environmentalists/libtards. Beyond that a smaller amount is given as support for the press but they want to increase that and set up a group of media companies/representators whom themselves are supposed to figure out who will get the money or not and as you can imagine those people will decide to support their own rather than those with a different opinion. And then we have private social media and search giants with their agenda deciding which opinions they let through and a climate where you definitely risk losing your job if the left go after you because you have the wrong opinion and that kinda effectively shut the voice of normal people down.
Sweden isn't far off from North Korea, Turkey, Iran and Russia.
The government may not do it but they are definitely considering it and their allies in the press and social media do it regardless, and where it's not done the activist communists make sure it get done anyway.
Also do accept that the Swedish government decided that it wouldn't be good if it by itself went after the people trying to shut them down for raising their opinions. Instead they decided it would be better if third parties did that and as a result they ARE financing third parties which do exactly that.
So "anti hate" and "anti racist" groups who act to shut people down get public funding to act. As such the government can still kinda claim they do allow it and that Sweden is a democracy and that we've got whatever freedoms and not too harsh laws but that's definitely not the case. Sweden is a democrature and the media is lying and fooling people.
Yeah, exactly NO-ONE can perceive a bite mark into the letter J in the name Steve Jobs as a BITE!
Regardless of whatever we eat letters normally or not ..
In North Korea, China, Russia, Turkey, Syria, Sweden, Iran, Germany what could go wrong?!
Even more so with socialism, globalism, immigration you didn't wanted and very large private media companies.
Citizens are wrong. Media is correct. Believe it!
Burry all the communists and enemies of whatever you want to call us, Europeans, the white race, ...
Among the very most searched for items on Google. Says enough.
You do realize I wasn't very seriously and mostly just joking about mac people? Especially since they may feel they are more professional because they bought a more expensive mac.
As for the 18 cores you can easily get it in a Windows PC too so.. whatever.
Macs are toys after all.
Even "professionals" commenting market moves dream them up.
But yeah. This one seem retarded.
..
Married with children 10 times over. Easily.
But I'm Swedish and need some Bundy-sense on a daily basis.
Go Mattis.
Free and save Europe.
The problem with that is of course that we may want the functionality of the software we've found. And atleast Windows haven't before offered a central repository. And for the same of competition we may not want one.
The US has "cook people"-missiles too.
You can choose politicians
Actually I really can't.
Here in Sweden we have a 4% border for parties so to get someone new in 4+% of the voters must support that meaning it would be far harder to get someone in than just giving that person 1/349 of the votes to get one place in the parliament.
Also for the established parties while theoretically you are allowed to vote for a candidate if you don't like their own choices they do lock down their name lists meaning you can't vote for someone they haven't chosen that you can vote for (and even if it was allowed and you did of course enough people would have to to get that person on top of someone. I don't know if a vote without crossing a specific candidate count as a vote on the top one on the list or just on no-one specific.
Also even if we vote for parties they together form their government and our government is usually not single majority party or a combination of the two largest parties (or even better that we skipped having a government whatsoever and let whole parliament vote, or better yet the actual people rather than having representatives, or better yet abandoned collective rule to liberate all individuals to rule themselves) meaning the parties themselves actually decide who will be the government and the government will likely be a group of parties which think similar rather than a group representing the majority of the people or one having a distribution like what the people voted on.
Also in Sweden after the last election in the "December agreement" in 2014 because they didn't liked the influence of the Sweden democrats in the parliament they agreed that the largest block would be allowed to rule and get a budget through and the other block wouldn't vote on their own one risking the Sweden democrats also supported that, thereby setting up a scenario where the votes on the Sweden democrats didn't matter and the parliament was just like if only the other parties existed. Similarly when they are discussing various issues the Sweden democrats isn't allowed to participate.
That agreement finally was publicly ended because it could make people feel they aren't living in a democracy! Which we aren't.
But like even now when the more socialist people wanted to raise the tax rate on the investment savings account the people who are more against taxes and I guess wouldn't propose that themselves rather than vote no which the Sweden democrats did they simply abstained and hence it passed meaning our actual minority government got things their way even though I assume the majority of the parliament would actually be against it but since the Sweden democrats doesn't count in the democrature of Sweden they pretended the majority was for it and there was nothing which could be done so it was passed.
So yeah. Our constitution may say that the government is our representatives and that all power comes from the people. But it's not the people who decide. The people are just tools to validate their own authority.
Sweden is ruled from above and the people are lectured and taught what to think, vote and do. Not the other way around.
Yeah. He said good men.
Nationalism is a good thing.
For America though I wouldn't call it nationalism but rather patriotism because the USA is a mixed country. I assume what you like there is the country not necessarily "your people."
Another thing to consider is that the USA is one of very few countries which tax their citizens abroad or whatever so that may make it less interesting for someone from the USA to work abroad whereas many from other countries wouldn't mind working in the USA.
And then we have the good socialist:
"Who would you rather trust? The government or the companies?"
My first reaction now was "well, at-least I can choose the company (I deal with)", then again I got reminded some people think that's also true for the government. However I don't feel like _I_ can choose it. Best case scenario _WE_ can but I don't see the opt out option.
If I don't like Facebook, which I don't, at-least I don't have to use it. As for cookies and various tracking if nothing else there's ways to try to avoid that.
Sorry for your lack of autism.
So. What are we talking about here?
A playboy bunny butt fucks me with a strap on for 1 BTC?
Reverse action to and I still got to keep the BTC?
I fail to see the problem.
Where do I sign up?
Because globalism.
People in the UK even though their great empire may be less ignorant ran people in the US I suppose if this surprise you.
Then again why is British coverage of it on an American ... whatever you want to call this site nowadays?
Well. What isn't worse than Hitler was?
Redundant information.
Everything is. Great guy.