But this seem to be the original + more rather than something modern using an emulator. This isn't a modern design with much more efficient components and manufacturing.
Greenmangaming, Gamersgate and Gamesrepublic sell Steam keys.
What I meant was that have access to the titles you've already bought in the distribution platforms they exist on, that is being able to fetch and run your game through Steam, the Microsoft one, the Apple one(?), GOG, Origin, Uplay.
The developers simply need to allow for this to happen.
(I don't mean on console but from all the store front-ends whatever Steam, Microsoft or GOG, but sure bought game available on all consoles and PC would be great.)
Over here in Sweden we can't change the outcome democratically any longer since our parliament with lots of parties has becoming like your solution except it's 7-8 parties which are joined together who are all responsible for what has happened and then the 1 party which has been against it and still are but they of course don't have as many votes as the others and considering the population is being replaced and lied to and you can't say what you want..
So any change has to come from outside of the parliament and democratically means. Starting our own Swedish parliament for Swedes? Leave the Swedish state and establish our own within the same borders? Violent solution? Leave EU / EU influence how? Liberated by foreign nation? Lost and destroyed forever?
I don't know what the solution is really. 60 million refugees they say, few millions who has come to EU, and already we are likely many tens of millions of people in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, UK, France,.. who feel like refugees ourselves in our own nations fleeing from socialism, cultural Marxism and the aliens who has come to take our land, property and freedom.
Well the one thing we know is that being restricted from "being racist" or expressing "hate speech" completely ruin your civilization, society, culture, technology and people. So that's a sure path to a loss in the game of civilization.
Vote Trump! Help us make EUrope.. well.. not worse and worse all the time again:D
What are the consequences of having super-strong magnetic dust all over the place? Can it get into your lungs? Into your eyes? What if a baby swallows some? Would walking next to a steel car cause perforations through the body?
It does but I also think all nations should strive to be self-sustaining.
It's of course safer that way. Then again just one more reason the globalists wouldn't want to have that =P
oh this is embarrassing, I wrote Syria when I means Saudi-Arabia. Anyway, I think any nation that's being propped up by simply extracting oil should be cut off because they aren't doing the world any favors by extracting it at all! We need to move to electric cars charged using solar/wind/nuclear/etc and use bioplastics instead of garbage plastic that cakes our oceans.
True true. I said I liked / loved Americans and your society and that's one thing I don't like about it though. The kinda disrespectful behavior against the environment. People just shooting bullet after bullet into something, blowing things up, shooting things into pieces, less recycling, land-fills, oil fracking,.. Sweden is likely more messy now than it used to be, or at-least than what it could had been with just natives living here. Like 20-30 years ago you'd see these stickers saying "Hå Sverige rent" as in "Keep Sweden clean" and they they had this image: http://kunskapsfestivalen.se/w... which speaks volumes. Recycling and sorting garbage is large here and and rest garbage are usually burned (and then used to heat homes) which of course isn't completely out of environmental impact that either, plus sadly the import garbage from other nations and burn it which likely pollute Sweden so that's shit. Before about half of our electricity came from hydro-power and the other half from nuclear so IMHO much cleaner energy. Though anti-nuclear power was a thing here too and still is and of course hydro-power is harmful for fishes and destroy nature somewhat too. I just think the "I can do whatever I want so I will" attitude is harmful for the environment =P, a clean and undestroyed environment has its value after all.
Iran at-least have some form of "democracy" I think? Though with religious rule and picks too.. So.. not really all that much. But Saudi-Arabia of course definitely isn't one. Saudi-Arabia is like one of the places in the world where I would be least interested to live because it's less free. Syria has had the same leaders for long too but what's the difference between the two really? That Syria is/was more socialist? Ally to Russia? But from a freedom / rule perspective? Of course lately they have attacked their own citizens but I assume Saudi-Arabia would try to too if someone tried to remove their royal family.
by "them" do you mean our own leader? we try to force them out on every election but if you mean a violent revolution, it would be lots of cops and the army if needed.
Yeah, or ours. And yes that's how I assume it would had been and as such I don't find it weird or any difference that that is what is also happening in Syria. Of course the people in charge wouldn't give it away without a fight. Here in Sweden we have a bunch of parties in the government and usually we've been ruled by a social-democratic (mostly) majority government possibly with support by someone else but 2006-2014 the ruling government what that made up of an alliance of four center-right (economical) parties. In the last election the Sweden democrats had 13% of the votes meaning that neither block could gain majority rule and the Sweden democrats said they would vote on the budget form the right which would either force the left which could form a larger government to rule on a right budget or just handle over rule to the right government. Neither of those sides want the Sweden democrats to get any power though because they hate Swedes and they like power so they made an agreement that instead of voting on their own budget they wouldn't vote at all if the other side was larger this election period and t
It's so weird that our national day is kinda celebrating the end of the Kalmar union.
WTF is that to celebrate? The problem with a union is that Sweden have the largest population and that our politics risk influence yours rather than the other way around.
Hence I would kinda be ok to include all Baltic nations and maybe Poland (and Hungary, Austria and Ukraine too?);D to make the land-mass have more natives and native voting power against the anti-white globalist Marxists, also more white people to mate with.
Scotland? Maybe, but they are such Nordic nations wannabes that it's not necessarily better for the political direction I want:D
GB and Germany of course has been good nations but they are also destroyed by mass-immigration so.. no thanks.
I can't say I know all that much about Iceland in general. One guy in our board-game club is from Iceland and he spoke about corruption and then I've watched images much of it of course is grassland so to say and I think I read 7% was covered with forests?
Since you are out in the sea milder winters make sense put possibly also colder summers. I don't really need the 25+ degrees C but it's nice to experience summer and while winter is my least preferred season I guess having snow sometimes is ok (but you do too.)
The way I see it Denmark seem to have mostly farm-land and be more densely populated and it's flat and lots of archipelago I assume. Likely very nice. Sweden only have lots of it in Skåne and I live in Örebro but there's still quite a bit of farmed land around here but also quite a bit of forests, but then there's so much area which is mostly just covered by forest and the parts in the north which aren't.
I have the impression less land may be farmed in Norway, the large lakes are fewer (also in Denmark), more mountains, likely very much beautiful nature and diversity there too, the population more spread out with better working rural areas and I guess Oslo and Stavanger feel large enough if that's what one is after anyway (relative Sweden.)
My view of Finland would be that of plenty of forests and of course small lakes. But my view of all of them is mostly just like satellite images, maps and whatever Google brings up. I haven't really been around in them.
I like forests and I like open landscapes too but I guess I like forests more, I also like especially large water bodies. Likely because that's where I've been brought up and it feel safe / like the stuff I know. If I was brought up in a mountain desert area maybe I would had liked and felt comfortable in that.
I guess another nice combination would be the Faroe Islands but that's even smaller still and I'm vegan and don't want to eat fish or like fishing (industry);D, very beautiful that too.
As said preferably it would all be just one nation where I could move around freely and visit and settle down wherever and experience all the beauty it is:) As is within one nation I just feel Sweden have the largest diversity simply because it stretches the furthest from south to north really:), but all of it would be even better, and it would likely had connected us even more.
I don't know enough of your politics, but as said I would assume your piracy party and environmentalist party is like ours and ours are terrible (anti-white communists so to say, or if you want open-border social-liberals.) Sweden need to be ruled by Norway, Finland and Denmark because they are saner and Sweden has already have ~30% people with immigrant background (just below 70% with two Swedish-born parents if you consider how many who actually live here.)
that's something i would like to see and would pay for instead of global exploitation and unnecessary dependency that props up nations like Syria.
Personally I think that it make sense to make things where's it's most efficient and from those who are best at it. Swedish trucks for Spanish tomatoes, or would you had wanted it the other way around? =P. It's very unlikely that I'll be able to get a Swedish-made processor and even if I did.. Also it brings the world closer which is retarded when people like our prime-minister have to keep a good relation with Saudi-Arabia even though the rule there is terrible simply because he likely don't want to ruin export opportunities and what not but having a standard and stand-point comes with a price - but maybe it's worth it? Anyway trade brings the world closer and make us more dependent on each other which also may force us to accept and understand the others.
Why is Syria and Iran worse than Iraq and Saudi-Arabia? Isn't it simply because they aren't US allies strategically?
How would our own leaders deal with it if we tried to force them out?
Not that I know all that much about the politics and actions in those nations so I really shouldn't speak all too much about it. Like I don't know how evil Ghadaffi was vs say Saddam when he was US ally or the Saud, I know he was for some sort of socialism, direct-democracy and an African and Arab union and I'm from a nation where I'm pretty used to the former, direct-democracy sounds great and if the people of Africa want to unite and work together politically for instance then I'm not here to stop them.
i'm certain that people from pakistan and afghanistan would disagree.
There are no KKK in Pakistan or Afghanistan though are there? The US is a special case I guess since it's a colony by itself on stolen land from the Indians and Mexicans and with black guys brought over against their will from Africa and it's not all that far to hate at-least those Indians, Africans and Mexicans and maybe Mexicans should have as much right to the land at-least as Europeans.
I don't really see how moving some other people in when it's trash is a good thing though. I've got full understanding for if the Indians and people of Mexico didn't liked the Europeans. I wouldn't be against them arguing the European colonization of their land even if it would be "hate-speech" - it's rather understandable and something which need to be ventilated. As for attacks.. Well.. In the US you own your land and property and have the right to defend it right? What's different with a nation you own together?
Can you own land? Definitely. Does nations exist? Definitely. Does citizens of a nation exist? Definitely. Someone are free to argue that shouldn't be the case and that we're all humans of the planet and should be able to roam it freely and I'm actually totally fine with that but if so don't make a national tax-driven welfare system for anyone in your nation because guess what will happen?..:D. It's so fucking stupid. It could be done globally but then again how fair would it be? Why do the one who don't work deserve things from the one who does? You're free to argue about banks and those who don't work for your money but at-least keep the result of LABOUR out of it. Why should someone be the slave of someone else? As for equal salary for all work it has enormous efficiency issues, but yeah, maybe with enough resources and automation we could allow for that to happen, and morally the resources of the planet should belong to all of us and at-least automation isn't slavery of living individuals (including animals, let them be FFS.)
absolutely. there should be a price to associate with evil and some people might actually start shunning these bastards like they should have been doing already.
I don't think so and who are there to decide who's e
So... no more H1-Bs, outsourcing and the price of oil would increase? DO WANT!
Not being allowed to export or import goods kinda suck. Though it's less of a problem for the US since it's so large and in the front-end right now you can be very self-reliable.
I guess eventually you'd lose your edge if you didn't have access to the global market though. And for something like North Korea which doesn't have shit or even Iran considering how little those nations produce beyond pumping up the oil..
I hope they would go after the evil execs of companies or maybe the KKK. Getting it wrong sucks but thems the breaks.
KKK is just fine but I get your point, getting rid of trash may be nice. Out in reality chances are their families and friends and so on risk being bombed too I guess. Fair?
Sounds like that would finally be enough to get people to fight for their rights instead of accepting the status quo!
I don't know which of the rights you're talking about, maybe it's both positive and negative freedoms, and yeah, you need to preserve your negative freedoms, you're one of the very few nations which actually kinda have them:), "right to live of others" I don't really see as a positive, we already have that together with pretty open access for anyone who want to take some of it and it suck. Sure it make society more equal but don't do it as a national project where anyone on the planet is invited.
Where was the dressing? Refugee immigration is trash - get over it. If there would be any dressing of it it would be that I think the actual variation in the world is nice and that I would be totally fine with each people being their own and having their tradition and they being a contribution to the diversity of the world and experiences one can get by going to different places but I definitely don't want them here to replace and destroy my people and society.
Why do you try to make your argument by measuring the size of the Swedish economy in USD?
Because measuring GDP in something more fixed and real than a fiat currency is more relevant, if you drop the value of the currency to half of course GDP will be somewhat higher. It also matter a lot for me since I can buy less for my money, the stuff beyond living expenses I want to buy are almost always imported (bunch of board-games and card-games, computer games, book and comic book bundles,..) and those are priced on the global market and hence much more expensive for me now than they were before.
All currencies are currently in a race to devalue the fastest
Which is negative if you already have money. Though if you have had the money in a US stock index fund instead you'd get a 150% profit in SEK in the same time.
given that there is too much slack production and debt in the world.
Taking money from Swedes to give to the r(ap)efugees doesn't increase their capability to buy things.
* Value of the money is relevant. * Number of citizens for a GDP / capita rather than just national GDP is relevant. * Public sector spending for immigration also ends up pushing up GDP without contributing anything positive whatsoever to the Swedish society and Swedes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Four months of average highs above 10 degrees C, 13.3 in July, lows below 0 for five months but worst one just -3 degrees in January.
I dislike the lack of trees, in Sweden you can get the whole range of farming landscapes (though the EU wants that to happen in more productive regions and Sweden be even more full of trees), lots of trees but also regions with few trees and mountains and grass instead of that's your thing, a few large lakes and plenty of smaller ones too and some archipelagos. There's a diversity of nature/landscape. Iceland do have trees but less of them. Norway is a nicer upgrade since it's closer in what's back home in the nature to me. Denmark maybe too, best would had been if it all together with Finland and Estonia was just one country as long as Swedish politicians and immigrants got nothing to say about the development of the region.
Our ass-hole of unelected primary minister here in Sweden can't even say that Saudi-Arabia is an undemocratic unequal inhumane non-free terrorist-supporting unprogressive barbaric hell-hole of a dictatorship, or even just ONE of those words because he's so afraid to stuck a label onto someone else at-least as long as they are Muslim because this i Sweden of political correctness and Marxist extremism including feminism and anti-white anti-racism, if it were Russia, Poland, Hungary, Austria, GB or Denmark and occasionally the US if we don't have a desperate need to lick ass it could had happen but of course not the conservatist non-free hell-holes in the middle-east or Africa because calling them out for it would almost be like doing what Hitler did!!
Of course Saudi-Arabia is pretty equal to us! Just different! Though of course soon enough we will be more equal with all the fucking Muslims they bring here and with that Islam, Islamization and Muslim harassment of everything non-Islamic and non-Muslim.
Yeah. Try to tell a woman she can't be hired for a job as a taxi driver in Sweden and see how that work politically... Or that no Mosques and Muslim propaganda should be allowed. Or that homosexuals should be killed or whatever. See how far that gets you here!
But I guess the ideological values are just national? As the little authoritarian socialist national fascist dictator (Stefan Löfven) wants it? Can't really have values and believe in them just as is without a nation? Saudi-Arabia should have theirs whatever it is and all Swedes should have his whatever that is because he's the ruler of the nation after all?! It's such a fucking joke. Traitors of the people should be dealt with - capital punishment is fine in Saudi-Arabia you say?
of you nord's parliaments. Canada's too. It's not a prefect solution but it is a _hell_ of a lot better than what I got here in the states.
Except Sweden is a democrature where the media and politicians lie about immigration and call everything refugees, call it good, hang out and isolate and kick out anyone who dare to say otherwise, can't say the truth, hide identity, think the government have the right to choose the people and voters rather than the other way around, think the will of the people (it's in this article too with "populism" is bad.) Complete tax pressure isn't all that far from 50% of GDP with the public sector and influence which follow with that including left-wing extremists as the standard among teachers and state-media, state-sponsored other media, clubs, cultural events, total tax on income in the range of 3/4s (if you add it all up together.) Politicians who spends way too much of others money onto destructive idiot projects and solutions no-one would fund with their own money, politicians who give so much to their own parties that they don't really need any members to be able to operate so culling can happen to the extreme, the social demo(c)rats while having less than 1/4 of the voter support still being heavily backed up by the unions obviously and the other way around and the complete domination within national media, schools, public sector,.. Foreign people used as a measure to get things through your way whatever it's to get more socialist voters, "green" voters (rather Islamists and socialists and anti-nationalists by now, guess it matches the Quran..) or liberalization of the markets to handle the situation. USD up 50% vs the SEK in just above 5 years time, quickly more people with the nation and still they talk about high GDP numbers, never mind the complete collapse in the SEK and the larger population, much of it not even accounted for yet because all the immigrants of 2015 haven't had their residency permits yet and even less so their families move over yet. Enormously increased private debt and hot job market with a private debt close that of the national GDP and which has increased well above 5% yearly before - sustainable?
Swedish GDP in USD 2006: 420.03 billion 2007: 487,84 billion 2008: 513.97 billion 2009: 429.66 2010: 488.38 2011: 563.11 billion (so far so good, enter the migration decision and lower interest rates.) 2012: 543.88 2013: 578.74 2014: 571.1 2015: 492.62
During 2006-2014 with the Alliance government and tax cuts the welfare kinda remained intact which could be done by selling out lots of public property but that's of course not sustainable either, so what you see is public sellouts and private debt of multiple trillions of SEK and more what? More than 500 000 more citizens likely going towards the million once their relatives are here and what to show for it? At best 25% GDP growth in USD over 10 years which would be on average 2.2% / year close to the "normal" of about 2.6%, throw in population growth of 5-10% and it look worse, say at worst 1.3% / year and capita. Sure there's others which are worse off but how many have doubled private debt or increased it with 50% of GDP during the "crisis"? The worst is yet to come..
And then it come of course political decisions and immigration will have nothing to do with it and it won't be tolerated if you put "weak groups against each other" or put blame on the weak group, even though we know, or should know, about the expensive solutions, their multiple years of very low performance on the job market (due to few unskilled jobs and high welfare payouts and high lowest wages and lots of money from simply having children and so on with little need to job if you don't want too because someone else will pay for your family anyway - anything else would be "un
Whatever one has a problem with that is up to each and everyone I guess. I have absolutely nothing against American citizens or the American life-style but it's food for thought it the situation was the other way around: * Sanctions against the USA. * Pakistan and Afghans drones which bombed in the other direction (you see, I can't even write the sentence as it should be written because if I did I'm sure some US filter would catch that and flag me as suspicious and super-dangerous.) * Got invaded to have the ruling government replaced by something else, possibly nothing. * Other nations trying to influence the election outcome (we really have a bit of that with Russia and Trump, how much does Russia care beyond just being somewhat amused? I don't know!
Is the purpose that the citizens in those nations will wake up and riot and demand a change of their leaders? How likely is that result? Has it been the result anywhere so far?
Of course here in Sweden I would just be happy if someone helped us remove our ruling elite but in most scenarios I can understand if people get pissed.
Slashdot Mirror
Nearly ONE IN THREE CALIFORNIANS VOTED TRUMP! Who is enslaving whom exactly you insensitive clod?
Also it has to be said that non-white votes, female votes or votes from a feminized man shouldn't count.
So there! :)
NES Classic Edition is an emulator console (with actual authorized game-titles.)
Shadow warrior 2 may lack multiplayer arena combat (I'm not sure) but supposedly it's free from copy protection(?)
If you want the multiplayer aspect there's Quake3-like games released as open-source and so on which you could run.
But this seem to be the original + more rather than something modern using an emulator. This isn't a modern design with much more efficient components and manufacturing.
Greenmangaming, Gamersgate and Gamesrepublic sell Steam keys.
What I meant was that have access to the titles you've already bought in the distribution platforms they exist on, that is being able to fetch and run your game through Steam, the Microsoft one, the Apple one(?), GOG, Origin, Uplay.
... is to get all of our games on all platforms.
The developers simply need to allow for this to happen.
(I don't mean on console but from all the store front-ends whatever Steam, Microsoft or GOG, but sure bought game available on all consoles and PC would be great.)
Thank you.
Over here in Sweden we can't change the outcome democratically any longer since our parliament with lots of parties has becoming like your solution except it's 7-8 parties which are joined together who are all responsible for what has happened and then the 1 party which has been against it and still are but they of course don't have as many votes as the others and considering the population is being replaced and lied to and you can't say what you want ..
So any change has to come from outside of the parliament and democratically means. Starting our own Swedish parliament for Swedes? Leave the Swedish state and establish our own within the same borders? Violent solution? Leave EU / EU influence how? Liberated by foreign nation? Lost and destroyed forever?
I don't know what the solution is really. 60 million refugees they say, few millions who has come to EU, and already we are likely many tens of millions of people in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, UK, France, .. who feel like refugees ourselves in our own nations fleeing from socialism, cultural Marxism and the aliens who has come to take our land, property and freedom.
Well the one thing we know is that being restricted from "being racist" or expressing "hate speech" completely ruin your civilization, society, culture, technology and people.
So that's a sure path to a loss in the game of civilization.
Vote Trump! :D
Help us make EUrope.. well.. not worse and worse all the time again
I wonder how long until an AI run the government.
It's a duty and a right for me to have a gun because I would be just fine becoming a US citizen?! GREAT NEWS! ;D
Heck, I'd sign up for the permit ;D
In Soviet Microsoft Windows 10, Windows update and reboots you.
What are the consequences of having super-strong magnetic dust all over the place? Can it get into your lungs? Into your eyes? What if a baby swallows some? Would walking next to a steel car cause perforations through the body?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ;)
I don't know. For the sellers to care they must risk facing the consequences if it's bad.
It does but I also think all nations should strive to be self-sustaining.
It's of course safer that way.
Then again just one more reason the globalists wouldn't want to have that =P
oh this is embarrassing, I wrote Syria when I means Saudi-Arabia. Anyway, I think any nation that's being propped up by simply extracting oil should be cut off because they aren't doing the world any favors by extracting it at all! We need to move to electric cars charged using solar/wind/nuclear/etc and use bioplastics instead of garbage plastic that cakes our oceans.
True true. I said I liked / loved Americans and your society and that's one thing I don't like about it though. The kinda disrespectful behavior against the environment. People just shooting bullet after bullet into something, blowing things up, shooting things into pieces, less recycling, land-fills, oil fracking, .. Sweden is likely more messy now than it used to be, or at-least than what it could had been with just natives living here. Like 20-30 years ago you'd see these stickers saying "Hå Sverige rent" as in "Keep Sweden clean" and they they had this image:
http://kunskapsfestivalen.se/w...
which speaks volumes.
Recycling and sorting garbage is large here and and rest garbage are usually burned (and then used to heat homes) which of course isn't completely out of environmental impact that either, plus sadly the import garbage from other nations and burn it which likely pollute Sweden so that's shit. Before about half of our electricity came from hydro-power and the other half from nuclear so IMHO much cleaner energy. Though anti-nuclear power was a thing here too and still is and of course hydro-power is harmful for fishes and destroy nature somewhat too.
I just think the "I can do whatever I want so I will" attitude is harmful for the environment =P, a clean and undestroyed environment has its value after all.
Iran at-least have some form of "democracy" I think? Though with religious rule and picks too .. So .. not really all that much. But Saudi-Arabia of course definitely isn't one. Saudi-Arabia is like one of the places in the world where I would be least interested to live because it's less free. Syria has had the same leaders for long too but what's the difference between the two really? That Syria is/was more socialist? Ally to Russia? But from a freedom / rule perspective? Of course lately they have attacked their own citizens but I assume Saudi-Arabia would try to too if someone tried to remove their royal family.
by "them" do you mean our own leader? we try to force them out on every election but if you mean a violent revolution, it would be lots of cops and the army if needed.
Yeah, or ours.
And yes that's how I assume it would had been and as such I don't find it weird or any difference that that is what is also happening in Syria. Of course the people in charge wouldn't give it away without a fight.
Here in Sweden we have a bunch of parties in the government and usually we've been ruled by a social-democratic (mostly) majority government possibly with support by someone else but 2006-2014 the ruling government what that made up of an alliance of four center-right (economical) parties. In the last election the Sweden democrats had 13% of the votes meaning that neither block could gain majority rule and the Sweden democrats said they would vote on the budget form the right which would either force the left which could form a larger government to rule on a right budget or just handle over rule to the right government. Neither of those sides want the Sweden democrats to get any power though because they hate Swedes and they like power so they made an agreement that instead of voting on their own budget they wouldn't vote at all if the other side was larger this election period and t
It's so weird that our national day is kinda celebrating the end of the Kalmar union.
WTF is that to celebrate? The problem with a union is that Sweden have the largest population and that our politics risk influence yours rather than the other way around.
Hence I would kinda be ok to include all Baltic nations and maybe Poland (and Hungary, Austria and Ukraine too?) ;D to make the land-mass have more natives and native voting power against the anti-white globalist Marxists, also more white people to mate with.
Scotland? Maybe, but they are such Nordic nations wannabes that it's not necessarily better for the political direction I want :D
GB and Germany of course has been good nations but they are also destroyed by mass-immigration so .. no thanks.
I can't say I know all that much about Iceland in general. One guy in our board-game club is from Iceland and he spoke about corruption and then I've watched images much of it of course is grassland so to say and I think I read 7% was covered with forests?
Since you are out in the sea milder winters make sense put possibly also colder summers. I don't really need the 25+ degrees C but it's nice to experience summer and while winter is my least preferred season I guess having snow sometimes is ok (but you do too.)
The way I see it Denmark seem to have mostly farm-land and be more densely populated and it's flat and lots of archipelago I assume. Likely very nice. Sweden only have lots of it in Skåne and I live in Örebro but there's still quite a bit of farmed land around here but also quite a bit of forests, but then there's so much area which is mostly just covered by forest and the parts in the north which aren't.
I have the impression less land may be farmed in Norway, the large lakes are fewer (also in Denmark), more mountains, likely very much beautiful nature and diversity there too, the population more spread out with better working rural areas and I guess Oslo and Stavanger feel large enough if that's what one is after anyway (relative Sweden.)
My view of Finland would be that of plenty of forests and of course small lakes. But my view of all of them is mostly just like satellite images, maps and whatever Google brings up. I haven't really been around in them.
I like forests and I like open landscapes too but I guess I like forests more, I also like especially large water bodies. Likely because that's where I've been brought up and it feel safe / like the stuff I know. If I was brought up in a mountain desert area maybe I would had liked and felt comfortable in that.
I guess another nice combination would be the Faroe Islands but that's even smaller still and I'm vegan and don't want to eat fish or like fishing (industry) ;D, very beautiful that too.
As said preferably it would all be just one nation where I could move around freely and visit and settle down wherever and experience all the beauty it is :) :), but all of it would be even better, and it would likely had connected us even more.
As is within one nation I just feel Sweden have the largest diversity simply because it stretches the furthest from south to north really
I don't know enough of your politics, but as said I would assume your piracy party and environmentalist party is like ours and ours are terrible (anti-white communists so to say, or if you want open-border social-liberals.)
Sweden need to be ruled by Norway, Finland and Denmark because they are saner and Sweden has already have ~30% people with immigrant background (just below 70% with two Swedish-born parents if you consider how many who actually live here.)
I'm not denying the capability of the USA. :)
The question is just whatever it should be done
"With great power comes great responsibility"? ;D
that's something i would like to see and would pay for instead of global exploitation and unnecessary dependency that props up nations like Syria.
Personally I think that it make sense to make things where's it's most efficient and from those who are best at it. Swedish trucks for Spanish tomatoes, or would you had wanted it the other way around? =P. ..
It's very unlikely that I'll be able to get a Swedish-made processor and even if I did
Also it brings the world closer which is retarded when people like our prime-minister have to keep a good relation with Saudi-Arabia even though the rule there is terrible simply because he likely don't want to ruin export opportunities and what not but having a standard and stand-point comes with a price - but maybe it's worth it? Anyway trade brings the world closer and make us more dependent on each other which also may force us to accept and understand the others.
Why is Syria and Iran worse than Iraq and Saudi-Arabia? Isn't it simply because they aren't US allies strategically?
How would our own leaders deal with it if we tried to force them out?
Not that I know all that much about the politics and actions in those nations so I really shouldn't speak all too much about it. Like I don't know how evil Ghadaffi was vs say Saddam when he was US ally or the Saud, I know he was for some sort of socialism, direct-democracy and an African and Arab union and I'm from a nation where I'm pretty used to the former, direct-democracy sounds great and if the people of Africa want to unite and work together politically for instance then I'm not here to stop them.
i'm certain that people from pakistan and afghanistan would disagree.
There are no KKK in Pakistan or Afghanistan though are there? The US is a special case I guess since it's a colony by itself on stolen land from the Indians and Mexicans and with black guys brought over against their will from Africa and it's not all that far to hate at-least those Indians, Africans and Mexicans and maybe Mexicans should have as much right to the land at-least as Europeans.
I don't really see how moving some other people in when it's trash is a good thing though. I've got full understanding for if the Indians and people of Mexico didn't liked the Europeans. I wouldn't be against them arguing the European colonization of their land even if it would be "hate-speech" - it's rather understandable and something which need to be ventilated. As for attacks .. Well.. In the US you own your land and property and have the right to defend it right? What's different with a nation you own together?
Can you own land? Definitely. .. :D. It's so fucking stupid. It could be done globally but then again how fair would it be? Why do the one who don't work deserve things from the one who does? You're free to argue about banks and those who don't work for your money but at-least keep the result of LABOUR out of it. Why should someone be the slave of someone else? As for equal salary for all work it has enormous efficiency issues, but yeah, maybe with enough resources and automation we could allow for that to happen, and morally the resources of the planet should belong to all of us and at-least automation isn't slavery of living individuals (including animals, let them be FFS.)
Does nations exist? Definitely.
Does citizens of a nation exist? Definitely.
Someone are free to argue that shouldn't be the case and that we're all humans of the planet and should be able to roam it freely and I'm actually totally fine with that but if so don't make a national tax-driven welfare system for anyone in your nation because guess what will happen?
absolutely. there should be a price to associate with evil and some people might actually start shunning these bastards like they should have been doing already.
I don't think so and who are there to decide who's e
So... no more H1-Bs, outsourcing and the price of oil would increase? DO WANT!
Not being allowed to export or import goods kinda suck. Though it's less of a problem for the US since it's so large and in the front-end right now you can be very self-reliable.
I guess eventually you'd lose your edge if you didn't have access to the global market though. And for something like North Korea which doesn't have shit or even Iran considering how little those nations produce beyond pumping up the oil ..
I hope they would go after the evil execs of companies or maybe the KKK. Getting it wrong sucks but thems the breaks.
KKK is just fine but I get your point, getting rid of trash may be nice. Out in reality chances are their families and friends and so on risk being bombed too I guess. Fair?
Sounds like that would finally be enough to get people to fight for their rights instead of accepting the status quo!
I don't know which of the rights you're talking about, maybe it's both positive and negative freedoms, and yeah, you need to preserve your negative freedoms, you're one of the very few nations which actually kinda have them :), "right to live of others" I don't really see as a positive, we already have that together with pretty open access for anyone who want to take some of it and it suck. Sure it make society more equal but don't do it as a national project where anyone on the planet is invited.
Window dressing for your racist views.
Where was the dressing?
Refugee immigration is trash - get over it.
If there would be any dressing of it it would be that I think the actual variation in the world is nice and that I would be totally fine with each people being their own and having their tradition and they being a contribution to the diversity of the world and experiences one can get by going to different places but I definitely don't want them here to replace and destroy my people and society.
Why do you try to make your argument by measuring the size of the Swedish economy in USD?
Because measuring GDP in something more fixed and real than a fiat currency is more relevant, if you drop the value of the currency to half of course GDP will be somewhat higher. ..) and those are priced on the global market and hence much more expensive for me now than they were before.
It also matter a lot for me since I can buy less for my money, the stuff beyond living expenses I want to buy are almost always imported (bunch of board-games and card-games, computer games, book and comic book bundles,
All currencies are currently in a race to devalue the fastest
Which is negative if you already have money. Though if you have had the money in a US stock index fund instead you'd get a 150% profit in SEK in the same time.
given that there is too much slack production and debt in the world.
Taking money from Swedes to give to the r(ap)efugees doesn't increase their capability to buy things.
* Value of the money is relevant.
* Number of citizens for a GDP / capita rather than just national GDP is relevant.
* Public sector spending for immigration also ends up pushing up GDP without contributing anything positive whatsoever to the Swedish society and Swedes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Four months of average highs above 10 degrees C, 13.3 in July, lows below 0 for five months but worst one just -3 degrees in January.
I dislike the lack of trees, in Sweden you can get the whole range of farming landscapes (though the EU wants that to happen in more productive regions and Sweden be even more full of trees), lots of trees but also regions with few trees and mountains and grass instead of that's your thing, a few large lakes and plenty of smaller ones too and some archipelagos. There's a diversity of nature/landscape. Iceland do have trees but less of them. Norway is a nicer upgrade since it's closer in what's back home in the nature to me. Denmark maybe too, best would had been if it all together with Finland and Estonia was just one country as long as Swedish politicians and immigrants got nothing to say about the development of the region.
Fuck off with that. You fancy Russian rule?
Our ass-hole of unelected primary minister here in Sweden can't even say that Saudi-Arabia is an undemocratic unequal inhumane non-free terrorist-supporting unprogressive barbaric hell-hole of a dictatorship, or even just ONE of those words because he's so afraid to stuck a label onto someone else at-least as long as they are Muslim because this i Sweden of political correctness and Marxist extremism including feminism and anti-white anti-racism, if it were Russia, Poland, Hungary, Austria, GB or Denmark and occasionally the US if we don't have a desperate need to lick ass it could had happen but of course not the conservatist non-free hell-holes in the middle-east or Africa because calling them out for it would almost be like doing what Hitler did!!
Of course Saudi-Arabia is pretty equal to us! Just different! Though of course soon enough we will be more equal with all the fucking Muslims they bring here and with that Islam, Islamization and Muslim harassment of everything non-Islamic and non-Muslim.
Yeah. Try to tell a woman she can't be hired for a job as a taxi driver in Sweden and see how that work politically ...
Or that no Mosques and Muslim propaganda should be allowed.
Or that homosexuals should be killed or whatever. See how far that gets you here!
But I guess the ideological values are just national? As the little authoritarian socialist national fascist dictator (Stefan Löfven) wants it? Can't really have values and believe in them just as is without a nation? Saudi-Arabia should have theirs whatever it is and all Swedes should have his whatever that is because he's the ruler of the nation after all?! It's such a fucking joke. Traitors of the people should be dealt with - capital punishment is fine in Saudi-Arabia you say?
Fuck off with that. You fancy Russian rule?
Sovereign nations and peoples isn't a choice?
It's one super-power/bully or the other?
of you nord's parliaments. Canada's too. It's not a prefect solution but it is a _hell_ of a lot better than what I got here in the states.
Except Sweden is a democrature where the media and politicians lie about immigration and call everything refugees, call it good, hang out and isolate and kick out anyone who dare to say otherwise, can't say the truth, hide identity, think the government have the right to choose the people and voters rather than the other way around, think the will of the people (it's in this article too with "populism" is bad.) .. Foreign people used as a measure to get things through your way whatever it's to get more socialist voters, "green" voters (rather Islamists and socialists and anti-nationalists by now, guess it matches the Quran..) or liberalization of the markets to handle the situation. USD up 50% vs the SEK in just above 5 years time, quickly more people with the nation and still they talk about high GDP numbers, never mind the complete collapse in the SEK and the larger population, much of it not even accounted for yet because all the immigrants of 2015 haven't had their residency permits yet and even less so their families move over yet. Enormously increased private debt and hot job market with a private debt close that of the national GDP and which has increased well above 5% yearly before - sustainable?
Complete tax pressure isn't all that far from 50% of GDP with the public sector and influence which follow with that including left-wing extremists as the standard among teachers and state-media, state-sponsored other media, clubs, cultural events, total tax on income in the range of 3/4s (if you add it all up together.) Politicians who spends way too much of others money onto destructive idiot projects and solutions no-one would fund with their own money, politicians who give so much to their own parties that they don't really need any members to be able to operate so culling can happen to the extreme, the social demo(c)rats while having less than 1/4 of the voter support still being heavily backed up by the unions obviously and the other way around and the complete domination within national media, schools, public sector,
Swedish GDP in USD
2006: 420.03 billion
2007: 487,84 billion
2008: 513.97 billion
2009: 429.66
2010: 488.38
2011: 563.11 billion (so far so good, enter the migration decision and lower interest rates.)
2012: 543.88
2013: 578.74
2014: 571.1
2015: 492.62
Residents:
2011: 9 482 855
2015: 9 851 017
Household and non-profit credits:
2006: ~1.8 trillion SEK
2014: ~3.25 trillion SEK
During 2006-2014 with the Alliance government and tax cuts the welfare kinda remained intact which could be done by selling out lots of public property but that's of course not sustainable either, so what you see is public sellouts and private debt of multiple trillions of SEK and more what? More than 500 000 more citizens likely going towards the million once their relatives are here and what to show for it? At best 25% GDP growth in USD over 10 years which would be on average 2.2% / year close to the "normal" of about 2.6%, throw in population growth of 5-10% and it look worse, say at worst 1.3% / year and capita. Sure there's others which are worse off but how many have doubled private debt or increased it with 50% of GDP during the "crisis"? The worst is yet to come ..
And then it come of course political decisions and immigration will have nothing to do with it and it won't be tolerated if you put "weak groups against each other" or put blame on the weak group, even though we know, or should know, about the expensive solutions, their multiple years of very low performance on the job market (due to few unskilled jobs and high welfare payouts and high lowest wages and lots of money from simply having children and so on with little need to job if you don't want too because someone else will pay for your family anyway - anything else would be "un
.. with foreign elections, ..
Whatever one has a problem with that is up to each and everyone I guess. I have absolutely nothing against American citizens or the American life-style but it's food for thought it the situation was the other way around:
* Sanctions against the USA.
* Pakistan and Afghans drones which bombed in the other direction (you see, I can't even write the sentence as it should be written because if I did I'm sure some US filter would catch that and flag me as suspicious and super-dangerous.)
* Got invaded to have the ruling government replaced by something else, possibly nothing.
* Other nations trying to influence the election outcome (we really have a bit of that with Russia and Trump, how much does Russia care beyond just being somewhat amused? I don't know!
Is the purpose that the citizens in those nations will wake up and riot and demand a change of their leaders? How likely is that result? Has it been the result anywhere so far?
Of course here in Sweden I would just be happy if someone helped us remove our ruling elite but in most scenarios I can understand if people get pissed.
Correct, but it may prevent you from flushing more money down a rat hole.
The military industry must love you.
"But we're almost done ..."
"No! I want a new one!"