Slashdot Mirror


User: Nutria

Nutria's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,954
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,954

  1. Re:Loads of Potential on New Sunlight Reactor Produces Fuel · · Score: 1

    If we didn't already have all of the infrastructure in place to utilize fossil fuels, we would probably say the same thing about oil...

    But we do, and it was built up over time, in parallel with our use of crude oil.

    It's kinda like how so many companies and individuals have invested so much in Windows that, despite tablets and smart phones, Windows isn't getting dislodged any time soon.

  2. Re:That's Too Bad on US Supreme Court Says NASA Background Checks OK · · Score: 1

    For some reason, that instantly brought to mind the Merle Haggard lyrics "They love our milk an' honey,/But they preach about some other way of livin'."

  3. Re:That's Too Bad on US Supreme Court Says NASA Background Checks OK · · Score: 1

    precisely because they did not want to work for an organization that had that kind of access into their personal lives.

    These smarter-than-everyone 22 year olds must not have realized that taking some drugs or being gay does *not* preclude you from getting Clearance...

  4. Re:TFS/TFA misleading; not about govt. employees on US Supreme Court Says NASA Background Checks OK · · Score: 1

    We put a man on the moon, damnit! Fifty years ago

    No wonder NASA can't build anything worth shit anymore: our "best and brightest" can't subtract 4 digit numbers!!

    Idiocracy here we come...

  5. Re:They only ask important questions on US Supreme Court Says NASA Background Checks OK · · Score: 1

    "Have you ever had sex with an animal?"

    Since humans are animals, and I'm Married With Children, the answer in an unqualified "Yes!!!"

  6. Re:Equal parts excitement and antipathy on New Sunlight Reactor Produces Fuel · · Score: 1

    Sodium melts at 208F, and boils at 1621F. (I'm betting the operating temperature in the reactor is around 1000F.)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactor_coolant

    So... Why in the hell would you raise it to 3000F?

  7. Re:Equal parts excitement and antipathy on New Sunlight Reactor Produces Fuel · · Score: 1

    Why not

    Because dissipating that much heat would make the boat a thermal beacon. "Here I am, Here I am! Shoot me!"

    they've had nuclear power plants on submarines since the 60s.

    That's presuming that correctly functioning nukes get that hot.

    I don't think they get *nearly* that hot.

  8. Re:Loads of Potential on New Sunlight Reactor Produces Fuel · · Score: 1

    It is a massive, effectively unlimited power source that can sustain several billion times what we use today.

    Which doesn't do us any good if we can't affordably and in large quantities convert photonic energy to electrical and chemical energy.

  9. Re:Equal parts excitement and antipathy on New Sunlight Reactor Produces Fuel · · Score: 1

    Would also enable regenerative atmospheric reprocessing on board a closed-system vehicle, like a submarine

    A 3000o furnace in a submarine?

  10. Re:Oil = yesterday on New Sunlight Reactor Produces Fuel · · Score: 2

    Oil is going nowhere fast,

    Oil goes *lots* of places, really quickly, thru an incredibly large network of pipelines all over the world. And in Really Really Really Big Ships that carry it half way around the world at 20 knots.

    It's that ease of transportability along with the fact that pumping continues day and night (almost) regardless of the weather which means that people will want to use Oil for a long time.

  11. Re:Oh, Firefox.... on Firefox 4, A Huge Pile of Bugs · · Score: 1

    I subscribe to nearly a hundred webcomics, and ... read them.

    When do you have time to do anything but read comics?

  12. Re:Security issues not theoretical on Why Linux Loses Out On Hardware Acceleration In Firefox · · Score: 1

    there was nothing they could do about it since the old drivers didn't support newer kernels or X.org.

    Even the *three* levels of legacy drivers (which are even still distributed in Debian Sid)?
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html

    Proprietary drivers always means dropping support.

    As if FLOSS developers never drop features to simplify code? GNOME & Handbrake spring instantly to mind.

    If I had open source drivers, I could have ported them myself.

    Who's out there forking GNOME, adding back all the dropped features?

  13. Re:What functionality are we BSD users ... on Xfce 4.8 Released · · Score: 0

    I had to Google "WOD" to see what it meant... :)

  14. Re:Yes, as I've said many times.... on Why Linux Loses Out On Hardware Acceleration In Firefox · · Score: 1

    NewEgg sells this sweet little fanless card which hooks neatly into VDPAU and is only US$30.

  15. Re:Security issues not theoretical on Why Linux Loses Out On Hardware Acceleration In Firefox · · Score: 1

    By what? The nouveau driver that doesn't adequately support my old-but-still-produced video card?

    http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix

  16. Re:And Xfce is...? on Xfce 4.8 Released · · Score: 1

    You really couldn't try http://www.xfce.org/ ?

    Anyway, it's a middle-weight DE based on Gtk.

  17. Re:What functionality are we BSD users ... on Xfce 4.8 Released · · Score: 2

    What functionality are we BSD users going to be missing? It didn't really say in the article at all other than that apparently there is a lot of Linux only stuff out there in the open source world?

    According to the 3rd paragraph, udev replaces HAL.

    So, since udev is Linux-only, apparently none of the devices that it manages and exposes to the WM can be seen by BSD.

  18. Re:Making it just as heavy as Gnome and KDE now? on Xfce 4.8 Released · · Score: 1

    I've got my wife/kids running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS because they are familiar with the Start Menu motif, while I run Xfce on Sid.

    When it's time to upgrade their OS, it'll probably be to xbuntu 12.04.

  19. Re:I'm glad you weren't my teacher on Advice On Teaching Linux To CS Freshmen? · · Score: 1

    most college freshmen probably come from households which have only used Windows or Apple PCs

    Burning a LiveCD and rebooting into $DISTRO isn't that difficult.

    OP's point is that good CompSci students must have an innate curiosity/geekiness about computers. In 2008, there's no excuse for him not to burn an Ubuntu or Fedora LiveCD and poke around.

    They're majoring in computer science because they want to learn about computers

    I had fellow students like that. They were B-A-D *horrible* programmers.

    (Yes, no matter what "Computer Science isn't programming" fools say, it *is* programming since there's a metric ass-load more need for software engineers and clever problem-solving programmers than there is for CompSci Professors.)

  20. Re:Lol on Advice On Teaching Linux To CS Freshmen? · · Score: 2

    Linux is for people who want to hack around and get to the guts of the OS because they're interested in that sort of thing.

    That's so completely wrong I just don't where to start.

    Linux (with the nvidia binary drivers) gives me the power of a minicomputer (I'm an old CLI geek) and us (me, wife & kids) simultaneous access to modern s/w and h/w without having to worry about malware.

    (FreeBSD is certainly in the same class, but I have no reason to use it instead of Debian Sid.)

  21. Re:yes they will on Advice On Teaching Linux To CS Freshmen? · · Score: 2

    Guenter: All I want is to be a monkey of moderate intelligence who wears a suit... that's why I'm transferring to business school!
    Professor Farnsworth: NOOOOOO!

  22. Re:Yes, as I've said many times.... on Why Linux Loses Out On Hardware Acceleration In Firefox · · Score: 1

    While I also have been a dedicated Nvidia purchaser for 10 years, I must acknowledge that the truth is that Nvidia does *not* support us because we are a rebel minority.

  23. Re:Yes, as I've said many times.... on Why Linux Loses Out On Hardware Acceleration In Firefox · · Score: 1

    Now if only they could be bothered to give a damn.

    Sigh...

    What actual non-ideological evidence do you have that NVIDIA doesn't give a damn about creating good drivers for Linux?

  24. Re:Security issues not theoretical on Why Linux Loses Out On Hardware Acceleration In Firefox · · Score: 1

    That might occur quickly if your card is 12 months old, but what if it is 3 years old.

    Hogwash. The latest (260.19.29) driver from last month still supports the 7 year old FX5800 and 4yo 7300. Even the oldest 71.x.y driver (which is presumably running on machines that don't track the latest kernel versions) got an update 6 months ago.

  25. Re:Will it cut down on Military Aircraft To Get All-Fiber Network Gear · · Score: 1

    As for in the air, there are electro-static dischargers on the trailing edges that help dissipate charges that build up

    That's what I was asking... :)