promises of a cost advantages of a couple factors over existing products in a rapidly advancing field are so sexy and an easy way to defraud investors.
I see things like this written: The company has raised a ton of money in the last few months, including some US$115 million in a recent Series D round that brings total equity investments up over US$210 million.
It always cracks me up to find people on the interwebs who don't even know what a computer is.
It always cracks me up when someone with a 5 digit ID tries to be snarky and then falls flat on his face because he doesn't know that computer doesn't sprinkle magic pixie dust on mathematical models, miraculously making them super-duper awesome-accurate.
Since I never asserted that my way is the only way, much less whether or not I actually have a way, as opposed to questions without strongly formed opinions, it's patently obvious that your assertion that I've decided what everyone should have access to is a steaming pile of zealot crap.
Slashdot Mirror
I was vaguely sympathetic until I read that.
how one achieves being a parent without a child?
People can die before their parents.
don't have LinkedIn and track running apps on your cell phone. Twitter and Uber are pretty damned useless, too, and FB is for parents with children.
It's obvious that some Windows nerds read /., but honestly... personal domain controllers? Is this a dormitory or fraternity house?
Except that I remember these kinds of claims being made 35 years ago in Silicon Valley.
Moving the cluster to the middle reduces that shift, making it faster. It also puts more of the road into your peripheral vision.
When it's in the center, I keep my eyes on the road, and my peripheral vision tells me if the speedometer dial is approximately where it should be.
To be honest, not every part needs to be as strong as a turbofan blade.
promises of a cost advantages of a couple factors over existing products in a rapidly advancing field are so sexy and an easy way to defraud investors.
Well, they are "sexy" in Silly Valley.
You should be old enough to have seen so many companies that get huge up-front investments, have snazzy demos and then fail to perform up to the hype.
I see things like this written: The company has raised a ton of money in the last few months, including some US$115 million in a recent Series D round that brings total equity investments up over US$210 million.
I'm not blind in that eye, but there's a damned good reason why important gauges are put right in front of the driver...
Keeping it local is all that's needed for effective room vacuuming.
I own the question, not the answers, because I'm some dude on /., not a PhD candidate writing a thesis.
It always cracks me up to find people on the interwebs who don't even know what a computer is.
It always cracks me up when someone with a 5 digit ID tries to be snarky and then falls flat on his face because he doesn't know that computer doesn't sprinkle magic pixie dust on mathematical models, miraculously making them super-duper awesome-accurate.
Carbon monoxide is rare
Not in regions of poor combustion.
NO2 is called "smog."
Clean your glasses. I wrote NO2-, which is definitely not smog.
Any other ESL questions I can help you with?
Any other chemistry (and reading comprehension) questions I can help you with?
I can't tell whether or not you're serious, or contrived an excellent example of the anecdotal fallacy.
By the same token we refer to carbon dioxide as "carbon" and NO3- as "nitrogen".
We do? Then what do you call carbon monoxide and NO2-?
Magazines mandate that writers write to a certain audience grade level.
The word "nitrate" is apparently too complicated for the people who read nationalgeographic.com.
You missed what they actually said, which was "more droughts", not a worldwide 100 year drought.
The county where I live sends text messages as severe weather alerts.
But one screen of code looks pretty much like any other, especially to managers.
Why in the world do you want to repeal the 17th Amendment? (Unless you're a Poe, in which case: good job!!)
But I thought that modern OSs figured out how to share even them in RAM.
Since I never asserted that my way is the only way, much less whether or not I actually have a way, as opposed to questions without strongly formed opinions, it's patently obvious that your assertion that I've decided what everyone should have access to is a steaming pile of zealot crap.