Slashdot Mirror


User: Nutria

Nutria's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,954
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,954

  1. Re:"there was no acknowledgment that ..." on Inside the Failure of Google+ · · Score: 1

    Does that mean they should not have tried to compete?

    It's easy enough to "clone" hardware and relatively software like MS-DOS, Lotus 1-2-3, etc.

    Much more so to clone Windows, it's gargantuan API and wide range of end-user (Office), developer (Visual Studio) and Enterprise software (Exchange, SharePoint, SQL Server, etc).

    Similarly, cloning those petabytes of user data in Facebook, plus it's API, plus convincing users that there's a reason to change is well nigh hopeless.

  2. Re:"there was no acknowledgment that ..." on Inside the Failure of Google+ · · Score: 1

    if they got it right

    The first not-right thing that they did was to not realize that Facebook is a market force like IBM was in 1981, but without the downside of competitors being able to clone the petabytes of data that sheeple have willingly uploaded to Facebook.

  3. "there was no acknowledgment that ..." on Inside the Failure of Google+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ambition is one thing, but ignoring reality is something completely different.

  4. Re:NASA says $10Bn on NASA Funded Study States People Could Be On the Moon By 2021 For $10 Billion · · Score: 0

    still pennies compared to the waste in ...

    The problem is that waste is endemic to massive government projects. Most of the voting populace want these wealth redistribution projects more than they want the onerous rules, regulations and oversight needed to eliminate waste.

  5. Re:There's no There there. on NASA Funded Study States People Could Be On the Moon By 2021 For $10 Billion · · Score: 1

    applying those $10 billion to exploring alternative energy sources, solving diseases, or paying teachers and improving crumbling schools.

    +1

  6. NASA says $10Bn on NASA Funded Study States People Could Be On the Moon By 2021 For $10 Billion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thus, it would really cost $30Bn.

  7. Re:There's no There there. on NASA Funded Study States People Could Be On the Moon By 2021 For $10 Billion · · Score: 1

    What's there for us on Mars? Some ice, lots of dust and some caves. Nothing else. No atmosphere, no energy, no plants, no *nothing*.

    Traveling 45 million miles for that is a completely *stupid* idea.

  8. Re:Hawking *can't* be so stupid... on Stephen Hawking and Russian Billionaire Start $100 Million Search For Aliens · · Score: 1

    I dunno.

    ISTM that *constantly* blasting out Very High Wattage radio waves in *every* *spherical* *dimension* is just... wasteful. Really, really wasteful. Not to mention really polluting of the EM spectrum.

    A constellation of satellites each scanning it's own region of space seems more efficient. They could also use LIDAR in the same way that we make 3D models of rooms and caves.

  9. Re: Hawking *can't* be so stupid... on Stephen Hawking and Russian Billionaire Start $100 Million Search For Aliens · · Score: 1

    Those stars are GINORMOUS.

    Meanwhile, we need massive radio telescopes to receive messages from the planet next door.

  10. Re:Hawking *can't* be so stupid... on Stephen Hawking and Russian Billionaire Start $100 Million Search For Aliens · · Score: 1

    active radar is something that a more advanced race will need more powerful versions of to track things in their solar system

    Why not use transponders?

    And if they're really advanced, they'll point their radars relatively close to the plane of the ecliptic where all the stuff is.

  11. Hawking *can't* be so stupid... on Stephen Hawking and Russian Billionaire Start $100 Million Search For Aliens · · Score: 1

    as to think that:
    1) anonymous space aliens are radiating coherent energy in all directions (we sure aren't) and,
    2) that we'll pick them up, when receiving photons from stars is so difficult.

  12. US govt considers chip tech vital to natl security on Why a Chinese Buyout of Micron Is Not Likely To Succeed · · Score: 2

    But didn't that boat sail 25 years ago?

  13. "those with window seats board first" on Simple Geometry = More Seats In an Airline · · Score: 1

    You *obviously* don't have a family.

  14. Re:stop Western technology companies on Hacking Team Breach Leaks Zero-Days, Renews Fight To Regulate Cyberweapons · · Score: 1

    Of course not!! *Obviously* the Chinese and Russian governments have have a long history of secular humanism and effective promotion of their citizens' welfare.

    (Oh, wait. That's Denmark & Sweden back when they didn't have many dark-skinned immigrants.)

  15. Re:Statism vs. Libertarianism again on Hacking Team Breach Leaks Zero-Days, Renews Fight To Regulate Cyberweapons · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You do your cause no good when you edit out crucial words.

    The actual quote: "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds".

  16. Jun is a commuter town. on Running a Town Over Twitter · · Score: 0

    And I'm betting it's a *wealthy* commuter town.

  17. This came so soon after the SpaceX launch. on Russian Cargo Ship Successfully Makes Orbit, Will Supply ISS · · Score: 1

    Are there two cargo docks on the ISS, or would the Soyuz have had to sit in a parking orbit for a month while they unloaded the Dragon, and then reloaded it?

  18. The Tor that was developed by the US military? That Tor?

  19. Re:"as a means to raise awareness ..." on Asteroid Day On June 30 Aims To Raise Awareness of Collision Risks · · Score: 1

    what reasonable precautions are we taking?

    Scanning the sky. But not building large-enough rockets.

  20. Re:"as a means to raise awareness ..." on Asteroid Day On June 30 Aims To Raise Awareness of Collision Risks · · Score: 1

    Aren't we already scanning the sky for asteroids?

  21. Re:"as a means to raise awareness ..." on Asteroid Day On June 30 Aims To Raise Awareness of Collision Risks · · Score: 1

    Once you can, then it's worth worrying.

    Right. And you get that capability by building Much Bigger Rockets, which is why I wrote, "lobby for the funding of Much Bigger Rockets."

  22. Re:"as a means to raise awareness ..." on Asteroid Day On June 30 Aims To Raise Awareness of Collision Risks · · Score: 1

    asteroid impacts are not an irrational fear

    I am afraid of getting hit by lightning, and getting bit by a shark, but not so afraid that I won't walk in the rain or swim in the ocean. I just take reasonable precautions.

    That's the difference between a rational fear and an irrational fear.

  23. "as a means to raise awareness ..." on Asteroid Day On June 30 Aims To Raise Awareness of Collision Risks · · Score: 2

    The awareness they are raising is that they want to waste our tax dollars on Yet Another Irrational Fear.

    If they *really* care about saving the Earth from civilization-killer asteroids, lobby for the funding of Much Bigger Rockets.

  24. Re:"In cosmic terms, it was a close call." on The Underfunded, Disorganized Plan To Save Earth From the Next Giant Asteroid · · Score: 1

    And, what has that to do with the topic?

    Huh? You're the one who first mentioned the Moon.

  25. Re:"In cosmic terms, it was a close call." on The Underfunded, Disorganized Plan To Save Earth From the Next Giant Asteroid · · Score: 1

    So? That big shiny thing isn't going to hit us either.