It would see that some preknowledge of the answers was going on.
For example, on the tuesday wessex couple question, one of the keywords used for their google search was "engagement"...the searcher already had preknowledge of the answer.
That kind of skews the results. Maybe this happened on the others too. They didn't list their search pattern.
the domain is registered for the 100 years... and so would be part of said failed company's assets that would be sold to someone else. Sure, it might go unused; or someone may want it. Either way, it is "allocated" for 100 years.
Just because a stereotypical woman doesn't want access under the hood for themself...doesn't mean they should make it hard to get the access. It would seem that they just don't care to have access, or not have access. But not caring if they can or can't isn't really much of a requirement...it just means, they don't care, so do it any way you want.
I don't think women inherently want to spend more money to service their vehicle just because they are women..that happens enough already.
A sealed closed hood only means they will have to pay more to have the whole front removed for access, instead of just opening the hood.
A LOCK for the hood might have been more practical. Of course, the article wasn't especially clear on the requirements and WHY they wanted the hood sealed.
Slashdot Mirror
It would see that some preknowledge of the answers was going on.
For example, on the tuesday wessex couple question, one of the keywords used for their google search was "engagement"...the searcher already had preknowledge of the answer.
That kind of skews the results.
Maybe this happened on the others too. They didn't list their search pattern.
the domain is registered for the 100 years... and so would be part of said failed company's assets that would be sold to someone else. Sure, it might go unused; or someone may want it. Either way, it is "allocated" for 100 years.
Just because a stereotypical woman doesn't want access under the hood for themself...doesn't mean they should make it hard to get the access. It would seem that they just don't care to have access, or not have access. But not caring if they can or can't isn't really much of a requirement...it just means, they don't care, so do it any way you want.
I don't think women inherently want to spend more money to service their vehicle just because they are women..that happens enough already.
A sealed closed hood only means they will have to pay more to have the whole front removed for access, instead of just opening the hood.
A LOCK for the hood might have been more practical.
Of course, the article wasn't especially clear on the requirements and WHY they wanted the hood sealed.
Actually, an RIAA bust at the end of the commercial would be pretty funny (if done right...).