The problem lies in that there's no validation of who's submitting or fetching the data and that the data is correct when deserialized. Someone can compose a binary stream that can be crafted to result in something unexpected when deserialized.
Exchange formats like xml can be validated before parsing.
The only sane language in that realm is Ada. C# is worse than Java because it's influenced by language problems from VB.
However the serialization is not really a language problem, it's an implementation problem. The serialization is something that could have been done better, and in a more safe manner. But it's also useful. Removing it may break a lot of applications and actually cause them to stay on older insecure runtimes instead of figuring out a way to secure that part in a manner that won't break the applications that are legal.
So that means essentially that the system isn't even permitted to choose between a truck trailer or a motorcyclist when a crash is unavoidable even though the former might be a better choice.
I think we will see a lot of crazy stuff floating up over the years to come and that we may all need to ride in bumper cars doing 10mph at most to avoid serious accidents.
It would if anything be easier to plant those devices, but only part of the data may be captured due to small cells and multipath solutions.
What might exist and is not possible to detect is the passive receivers that spies can use. It will of course be more complicated to decrypt info, but if it's just used to track people it's good enough once you have identified the IMEI or IMSI of the phone.
But the intent of the laws still are interesting from an AI perspective. So there is a reason to at least consider them when designing an AI. The fourth law looks good on paper, but it may be a problem too for humanity.
How do you then decide which action to take if there are situations where humans can be injured or iilled regardless of action. Like choosing between 100 kids or 100 elderly people?
Liberal: "willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas." Socialism: "any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"
Make that 6000 years so you can include the first texts too.
Then - who's the copyright holder? And what if it's now no longer possible to read in any other language than ancient Hebrew since the copyright holder says so?
The software in the Apollo moon lander is probably one of the most qualified in this category considering that it had to be reliable and it was used in a solution that couldn't be tested for all eventualities on Earth.
Thunderbird, and I have the inbox zero strategy. It helps me getting ahead of the game and not lag behind at work because then I can figure out what's important to work on and stay clear of working on futile things.
Slashdot Mirror
The problem lies in that there's no validation of who's submitting or fetching the data and that the data is correct when deserialized. Someone can compose a binary stream that can be crafted to result in something unexpected when deserialized.
Exchange formats like xml can be validated before parsing.
The disadvantage with xml is that it creates a lot of overhead, which could be a problem in embedded applications and large scale solutions.
The only sane language in that realm is Ada. C# is worse than Java because it's influenced by language problems from VB.
However the serialization is not really a language problem, it's an implementation problem. The serialization is something that could have been done better, and in a more safe manner. But it's also useful. Removing it may break a lot of applications and actually cause them to stay on older insecure runtimes instead of figuring out a way to secure that part in a manner that won't break the applications that are legal.
So that means essentially that the system isn't even permitted to choose between a truck trailer or a motorcyclist when a crash is unavoidable even though the former might be a better choice.
I think we will see a lot of crazy stuff floating up over the years to come and that we may all need to ride in bumper cars doing 10mph at most to avoid serious accidents.
You don't know what I work with.
It would if anything be easier to plant those devices, but only part of the data may be captured due to small cells and multipath solutions.
What might exist and is not possible to detect is the passive receivers that spies can use. It will of course be more complicated to decrypt info, but if it's just used to track people it's good enough once you have identified the IMEI or IMSI of the phone.
A spark gap transmitter blankets all bands.
Or redefine what a human is.
Blond and blue-eyed is a human, the rest aren't.
But the intent of the laws still are interesting from an AI perspective. So there is a reason to at least consider them when designing an AI. The fourth law looks good on paper, but it may be a problem too for humanity.
How do you then decide which action to take if there are situations where humans can be injured or iilled regardless of action. Like choosing between 100 kids or 100 elderly people?
That was the fist definition that appeared when searching for liberal definition on Google.
And it matches what the classic definition of Liberal is - and then the term has been hijacked by politicians that have contaminated it.
Liberal: "willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas."
Socialism: "any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"
Pick what you really mean.
Should the media cover accidents?
Should the media cover terrorist actions?
Should the media provide weather reports?
If I'm using my R250s Neither Apple nor Droid will get my data.
It actually takes quite a deal of skill and sophistication to cut software down to the absolutely necessary level needed.
They are afraid that others will make money from it.
Here's an interesting Mickey Mouse: https://www.tradera.com/item/3...
And if you own the bank $100 billion it's a government problem.
Make that 6000 years so you can include the first texts too.
Then - who's the copyright holder? And what if it's now no longer possible to read in any other language than ancient Hebrew since the copyright holder says so?
The software in the Apollo moon lander is probably one of the most qualified in this category considering that it had to be reliable and it was used in a solution that couldn't be tested for all eventualities on Earth.
If you upload videos then the location might be nice too, but that's a minor issue.
How about not using the app but a web browser?
A step up from mailx.
If you have a problem with the font you should have your eyes examined.
The fonts that are used by many web sites today are the worst, they are all fuzzy. Thunderbird has really sharp and easy to read characters.
And why do you want to use Outlook? It's a pretty crappy client with a junk mail filter that's bad.
Thunderbird, and I have the inbox zero strategy. It helps me getting ahead of the game and not lag behind at work because then I can figure out what's important to work on and stay clear of working on futile things.