Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: Which Is Your Favorite Email Client?

With Google recently rolling out a big revamp of Gmail to mixed reviews, we would like to know which email client you prefer. Are you a firm believe in the "inbox zero" idea -- that is, the approach to email management aimed at keeping the inbox empty, or almost empty, at all times? If you're looking for inspiration, Ars Technica recently published an article highlighting several different email clients used by the editors of the site: Are you the sort of person who needs to read and file every email they get? Or do you delight in seeing an email client icon proudly warning of hundreds or even thousands of unread items? For some, keeping one's email inbox with no unread items is more than just a good idea: it's a way of life, indicating control over the 21st century and its notion of productivity. For others, it's a manifestation of an obsessively compulsive mind. The two camps, and the mindsets behind them, have been a frequent topic of conversation here in the Ars Orbiting HQ. And rather than just argue with each other on Slack, we decided to collate our thoughts about the whole "inbox zero" idea and how, for those who adhere to it, that happens. Some of the clients floated by the editors include: Webmail, Airmail 3, Readdle's Spark, Edison Mail, Sparrow, Inbox by Gmail, and MailSpring.

406 comments

  1. Thunderbird or AlPine by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thunderbird for desktop, Pine/AlPine for shell, K-9 Mail for a phone.

    Webmail is for the birds. And I'm not organized or disciplined enough for the "Inbox Zero" cult.

    1. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have thunderbird but don't use it much. I am mostly on webmail for personal mail. Not great but workable.

      I just restored files in Thunderbird for my mom's computer (third time hit by IT scam and she still won't believe that people offering to fix her computer for free are the bad guys). It's a pain in the ass because of how it does things. Proprietary file formats, databases, and such. I've got a lot of old email folders back in normal Unix text format, easy enough to copy around. But outside of Unix no one came up with a standardized mail format. So trying to fix things up, not having a nice way to copy over files was annoying, and trying to fix up weird bugs (it would hang for 10 minutes after startup, possibly due to corrupted database file). Then a day later I find that the address book was missing after all my fixes, and so I'm stuck searching the web for which file to restore so that I don't have to restore from an old backup to a new profile just to get the address book to copy to the real profile.

      Sure, maybe all the mail programs act this way now. But it would be nice if things were easier to deal with - such as a built-in import/export feature for folders and address books and settings (oddly I saw an export option for some things but not a corresponding import). I'm not happy that all these programs seem designed to lock you in for life unless you're willing to start over from scratch.

    2. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      You darn kids - get off my lawn!

    3. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Webmail is still a thing? Seems so yesterday ...

      Thunderbird on the desktop for serious work, and iOS clients for simple stuff when away from the PC.

    4. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, Thunderbird is an incredibly buggy and sometimes inoperable application, in which long-term bugs never get fixed and frequently it fails to work correctly at all.

      If only the developers would spend some serious time getting it working right, it would be awesome.

    5. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Webmail is for the birds.

      I'm with you there. But I'm using Outlook Express. 20 years and counting. People like to mock OE, but it does everything I need, without the half-finished feel of TBird. And I wrote a small database program to store all of my old email for easy searching.

      But if I ever have to give up OE, TBird is the only serious contender to my mind.

    6. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by mschuyler · · Score: 2

      Amen. I use it, but the bugs are so bad I live in frustration. I need to get off my butt and get something else. I guess it's just not quite broke enough to fix it.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    7. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Maybe Thunderbird has gotten better, but when I used it about a decade ago it was the worst email client I've ever used. A simple task like configuring a POP server was impossible till I realized I had to halt it's braindead "auto-configure" mode in midstream. If I waited for auto-configure to fail, I was STUCK, with no option to configure it myself.

    8. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Amen. I use it, but the bugs are so bad I live in frustration.

      What are some of the bugs you encounter in Thunderbird? I've been using it forever and it I can't remember experiencing a bug.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by sgage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I too have used Thunderbird since forever with no problems, and I still do. I have tried them all, but keep coming back.

      I will not knowingly have anything to do with Google.

    10. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pegasus for desktop, Mutt for shell and K-9 for phone.

    11. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another vote for Alpine. I have been using Pine variants as my primary email client for twenty-four years now. The default settings are pretty bad, but I can easily customize it to meet my needs. I have never used a mail client that I loved, but Alpine is the least sucky currently supported client that I have used.

    12. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by krygny · · Score: 2

      Maybe Thunderbird has gotten better, but when I used it about a decade ago it was the worst email client I've ever used. ...

      On that, I'd have to go with Lotus Notes. GAWDAWFUL.

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    13. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      I am a fan of Thunderbird! It works well for 90% of use cases and it has good integration for Lightning for calendars.

    14. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Thunderbird, and I have the inbox zero strategy. It helps me getting ahead of the game and not lag behind at work because then I can figure out what's important to work on and stay clear of working on futile things.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    15. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use webmail , it came with my web tv

    16. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by jrumney · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thunderbird keeps its mail folders in standard mbox format. It also has additional files in its own private format (seems to be some form of XML) for tracking meta information about messages, but other mail clients can easily import or read the mbox files.

    17. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Thunderbird is an incredibly buggy and sometimes inoperable application, in which long-term bugs never get fixed and frequently it fails to work correctly at all.

      If only the developers would spend some serious time getting it working right, it would be awesome.

      You could always donate. Seems that the Thunderbird developers have their hands full just chasing Firefox (mostly the same code base) and keeping it building.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    18. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by antdude · · Score: 1

      What about Mutt instead of (Al)Pine?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    19. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Thunderbird on Windows, Linux Mint, and Mac. (I use different computers routinely.)

      On Android, I use the stock Gmail app.

    20. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I agree about webmail, and I also happen to use Thunderbird. I do, however, think that Thunderbird is pretty terrible and I wish there was a better alternative. It's just... it looks terrible, it's buggy, its option and features are all over the place with quite little coherence to it all; I am perfectly happy with the amount of features it has and I'm not asking for more, I just want all the stuff it has to be presented in a clearer, more accessible manner.

    21. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by lucm · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird on the desktop for serious work

      I wonder what kind of serious work involves email.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    22. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by lucm · · Score: 1

      Auto-configuration nowadays is a lot better in pretty much any email client, thanks to our friend the DNS. But Thunderbird is still a bit behind in that regard compared to outlook.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    23. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by lucm · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird, and I have the inbox zero strategy. It helps me getting ahead of the game and not lag behind at work because then I can figure out what's important to work on and stay clear of working on futile things.

      I use a streamlined version of inbox zero. Every Monday I do a CTRL-A + DELETE on the entire inbox. It's scary the first couple times but after that it's quite zen. I also aggressively auto-blacklist fluff, HR announcements, status updates and anything where I'm in CC. It doesn't take long to realize how futile email is.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    24. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Thunderbird support mailboxes with 50k or more messages yet? No, okay going back to Outlook. Seriously there are no open source mail clients worth a damn. I just use webmail because horde is more featureful than fucking thunderbird.

    25. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Duckman5 · · Score: 1

      What are some of the bugs you encounter in Thunderbird?

      The interface used to freeze randomly and completely for varying periods of time. Made it completely unusable for me. It's not an unknown problem. Unfortunately, none of the fixes ever seemed to work for me.

    26. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by bferrell · · Score: 1

      +10

    27. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      No, calling the mail storage of Thunderbird "mbox" is a stretch. Calling it "standard mbox format" is wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    28. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by e432776 · · Score: 1

      I'm a lot like you: (al)pine when logged in locally, Thunderbird on MS Windows, and Mail.app on MacOS. These are in reverse order of my use frequency, actually.

      One problem I have (and I don't think I'm alone) is that work mail is via Exchange only. I use this to allow Thunderbird to interoperate, and its.. OK. Not perfect, but better than having to use Outlook, which to me seems to have odd quirks and does not play well with my IMAP server.

      Last year I experimented with Spark email on MacOS. It was great! Had lots of nice features I could see myself getting very used to. Then, I found out that they have a serious privacy issue built right in and I immediately dropped it. This was a pretty depressing moment. Makes you appreciate open source.

    29. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by freudigst · · Score: 1

      Don't even mention Outlook. I have to suffer that at work. It can't even figure out if a mail has been read or not. Still, in the year 2018 for Godsakes!

      Mind you, Thunderbird has had trouble with that lately as well, but at least its behavior isn't so fundamentally flawed. It has less problems after years of neglect than Outlook with all the incompetence it has thrown at it.

    30. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by aliquis · · Score: 1

      It's weird how I even get any e-mail with all the agencies and companies spying and deciding who get to say what.

    31. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure $20 via PayPal will get another 3 devs allocated to it.

    32. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by oobayly · · Score: 1

      One of the biggest issues I had with Thunderbird was incredibly slow deletion of emails (for some users). It could sometimes take a minute to delete a single email, blocking the UI.

      I tried using maildir instead of mbox, playing around with the tuning settings, disable AV scanning of the profile location, to no avail.

      Then I found a single post that mentioned indexing, and discovered that the clients with problems had "Allow Windows to Index Emails" checked. It seems that deleting an email would fire an indexing callback that blocked the UI until it returned

      On Linux I find it crashes every couple of weeks, but I haven't seen any issues on Windows since disabling indexing.

    33. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And you think a ten year old experience is useful today?

    34. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Teun · · Score: 1

      In the Win95 and 98 days I used Outlook Express but once I saw the light and went Linux Thunderbird is the mail client of choice, also on Windows.
      I find it stable, easy and logic.

      Anything Google or MS is not going to scrape my mail, as a webmail client my ISP uses (and develops) Roundcube and it does the job.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    35. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c. 85k and counting...

    36. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Webmail has a few advantages. The main one with Gmail is the search feature that seems to be vastly better than any email client I've used, especially Thunderbird.

      The is no need to waste time organising mail any more, because search is so good. It's a massive time saver.

      None of the jankyness of IMAP either, it syncs perfectly and never breaks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue that forced me to move away from Thunderbird was the occasional freezing of the client which also seemed to lock up the IMAP account on the server. When this happened I would not be able to access the account for anything up to an hour and would have no indication of whether or not my last email was ever sent. This was extremely embarrassing while trying to run a business. I actually switched providers thinking that this had to be a problem at their end only for it happen with the next one.

      Never found a solution only sporadic bug reports. Haven't touched TB since.

      Currently trying out Opera's client which is feature-poor and has it's own set of bugs but at least I know when my email has been sent.

    38. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird here as well, with Lightning Calendar plugin. Simple, reliable, fast, decent filtering, easy to backup.....with one HUGE flaw: cannot share the profile on the network.

    39. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The beta for next Thunderbird looks solid. Really glad to see it getting attention again as it is sorely needed.

    40. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems that the Thunderbird developers have their hands full just chasing Firefox

      There's the problem. Thunderbird is too full of bugs. Well, they are too busy chasing the most buggy web browser since IE4.

    41. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, you don't have to keep your mail in local folders and rely on that. All my mail is kept by Dovecot on an IMAP server that Thunderbird accesses. Yes, Thunderbird caches it locally, but that's not something that I have to pay any attention to. All the mail is kept in truly standard Maildir (mbox, at least in Dovecot, doesn't support nested directories) format on the server.

    42. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the jankyness of IMAP either, it syncs perfectly and never breaks.

      What exactly does Gmail sync perfectly with?

    43. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      MoFo has made tens of millions of dollars while Thunderbird bugs have been well-known, well-reported, and the fixes required understood. It's been a decade.

      The one way donations might help would be to hire an outside team to make fixes and send them upstream. I would contribute to such a project.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    44. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by kyrio · · Score: 1

      They discontinued that a long time ago. It was a really great client but it's long dead. What OS are you running?

    45. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird's on its way out, at least for me, on account of their wanting to dump XUL and such in favor of becoming WebExtensions crippleware. Good luck writing an alternative service provider in WebExtensions.

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    46. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if you were to upgrade away from your Gateway 2000 Celeron 333 with 96 MB RAM you'd have a better experience with it. Horde really isn't bad either, so I'll give you that one.

    47. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      I use this [mozilla.org] to allow Thunderbird to interoperate,

      Not to be too much of a pest, but I really wonder what they're going to do when Thunderbird dumps its existing plugin APIs in favor of WebExtensions...

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    48. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would TBird devs work on MS Edge?

    49. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rarely use Thunderbird except when people send me piles of HTML email garbage. ALPINE is my 99% daily e-mail client. I wonder if people like us are in the minority these days. Kinda sad that text mode apps are dwindling.

    50. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I wonder what kind of serious work involves email.

      All of it?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    51. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by dryeo · · Score: 1

      MoFo quit caring about Thunderbird some years back, even went so far as to ban all their paid developers from spending any paid time working on Thunderbird (and SeaMonkey). Mozilla developers used to help adapt new code to Thunderbird or at least give heads ups about changes.
      Since then they've been busy ripping out any code that the new Quantum Firefox doesn't need, forcing Thunderbird to port it to Comm-Central as well as lately not allowing Thunderbird to use their infrastructure, build bots and such, even the add-ons have to migrate to thunderbird.net.
      It's Thunderbird (and separately SeaMonkey) that need money to pay developers and pay for infrastructure.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    52. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Proprietary file formats, databases, and such... But outside of Unix no one came up with a standardized mail format.

      Thunderbird uses the cross-platform MBOX standard. I've even been in a triple-boot scenario where the Linux, OS X, and Windows Thunderbird clients could all access the same network share that held the email. It was great! Here is a list of other standards.

    53. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Opera Mail stores emails as individual plain text files. Nice feature to get full grep support on your inbox.

    54. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      You may be in for a shock when your work environment catches up to 2015.

    55. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird is as slow as webmail. It's even slower when the inbox starts filling up. UI is atrocious. Whole project feels amateurish. Thunderbird was good in 1999. And then it stopped improving.

    56. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Any team that wants to waste their resources building a mail client on a browser platform has not demonstrated they will use my donations wisely.

    57. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      I don't use Windows much. I have a gaming machine I sometimes need to browse the web on to download some software. Edge seems fine. It's never crashed. It's fast. There's no nagware boxes like IE. The design is a bit flat and unengaging, but it's a solid browser.

    58. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      At first I assumed you meant it could not tell if the recipient opened the email and read it, and I was thinking that's to be expected.

      Then I realized you probaly meant that it could not tell if you had read an email locally, which is quite sad, if true.

    59. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      In my experience if you don't go zero mail in Thunderbird, the entire app starts crawling, so that's probably a good strategy.

    60. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Opera's mail search was superior to Google's in almost every way. Predictive typing, live results, quickly create virtual folders from results, better UI...

    61. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird was forked off of the browser platform, or rather the suite when Firefox was forked from Mozilla, so it's more that they're maintaining it then building it.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    62. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      A mail client has the following responsibilities :

      1. Fetching mail (by keeping track of accounts, authenticating etc.)
      2. Storing mail : and making it easy to search, archive, backup, view/transport in various ways
      3. Composing and sending mail

      You have relieved Thunderbird of the responsibility no. 2 above. I have also relieved it, to a certain extent, BTW. But this does not mean that it is not bad at that responsibility.

      Storing mail in its own mbox format is a weakness. Calling it standard mbox is still wrong.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    63. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You know, I now remember this about thunderbird. I was just frustrated with trying to rebuild and restore a profile and try to figure out why it kept hanging.

    64. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Second the motion on Thunderbird. Perfectly happy with it. Reminds me a bit of Pegasus back in the Win3/MSDOS days.

    65. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by Albert71292 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Opera Mail is an "end of life" product now. Will no longer get new features or security updates.

      --
      "A Bird In The Hand Will Poop On Your Wrist"-Benny Hill,1982
    66. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by pstern · · Score: 1

      Never found a GUI mail client I didn't hate.

      I use thunderbird only when I have to deal with incoming html emails. I use it on various platforms.

      Alpine is by far my favorite client. Works especially well on high latency, low bandwidth connections. It is light weight but has alot of power for managing messages. I use it on all the various platforms I deal with. On the down side there are some imap servers that Alpine seems to hate when it comes to marking deleted messages only to have them immediately deleted. The lack of a deleted messages or trash folder will sometimes bite you. Once you expunge, the messages are gone. Gotta love those empty body calendar invites that Outlook sends.

      K-9 on android is the best I've found although I recently ran into a problem with file attachments. It won't display certain types of files for attaching. You have to use an external program to select those types of files. Kinda kudgey.

      Once a year I get to zero inbox.

    67. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by herve_masson · · Score: 1

      I use Thunderbird almost forever. I kind of like it, but it has serious annoyances.
      My mailbox is getting big over time ; getting thunrderbird in sync with this large IMAP folder tree is sometimes painful and slow.

      - It sometimes re-fetch all mail headers within folders for unknown reasons, which takes forever (it likely has to do with an aborted sync operation)
      - It sometimes render the mail body of an email with the header of another one (usually when I'm trying to open a large mail)
      - Interface responsiveness and action's feedback ... well ... sucks.
      - per-folder unread message count sometimes stop to be accurate (I have to open folders individually to get them updated)
      - development of this program seems stalled for a long time
      - rich text editor is awful/painful
      - this damn quick search area that disapear on ESC key press !
      - sorting folders takes an extension
      - preventing accidental folder move another one (on IMAP, it's just a disaster)

      But it's still my email client ! I like its way to classify mails, deal with email models, etc.
      And also because I hate to change my habits, to be honest.

      It's a great program that should have more horsepower to get updates. I would pay for using it, no doubt.

    68. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      While I'm glad you took the comment as tongue-in-cheek, there's an underlying truth to it also. Much serious work requires secure communication. That usually means not on 3rd party cloud hosted systems which leaves out pretty much every product you'd probably like to name in 2018. Almost everything is subject to simple 3rd party interception, unless you're running some additional endpoint specific encryption software.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    69. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, brother.

    70. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by lucm · · Score: 1

      Then I realized you probaly meant that it could not tell if you had read an email locally, which is quite sad, if true.

      Happens to me too at work. That and the always exciting (1) problem: randomly the badge next to the inbox label seems to think there's 1 unread email even if I delete the whole inbox. Those are things one would assume are caught by very very basic QA.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    71. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

      It's NEVER been buggy for me. Been using it for many years.

    72. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Zappy · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird is a passable imap4 client, all mail should be on the server. For a reinstall only the credentials should be needed.

    73. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Zappy · · Score: 1

      Switch Thunderbird into off-line mode before starting to set up a new account, the auto-configure has to be designed to dissuade people from using Thunderbird, I cannot think of any other reason why it would be so excruciatingly unusable in an otherwise decent mail client.

    74. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to write an EMail layout in HTML and send it to a institute that uses Notes and hearing the wines of the people at work because the mail does not render right. And insist that you make it so it looks the same in Notes.

      And also, get this, that if the Notestard FORWARDS the mail to someone else it STILL looks the same??!!

      And then bitching and complaining and whining and insulting you until the end of the world??? Oh, its the bosss blonde wife so no complaints allowed?

      Welcome to hell.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    75. Re:Thunderbird or AlPine by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I use SeaMonkey's mail client which hies from the same origins. It's generally pretty good, tho occasionally has refused to let me create a new mailbox -- it insists on replacing an old mailbox instead. I haven't got this nailed down to reproducible (tho I wonder if a fragmented profile might cause it).

      The other thing is that if mailboxes get too large or too fragmented, it can get slow and cranky, which I take as a cue to do a little maintenance and cleanup. I keep mail on its own partition which helps considerably.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    76. Re: Thunderbird or AlPine by freudigst · · Score: 1

      At first I assumed you meant it could not tell if the recipient opened the email and read it, and I was thinking that's to be expected.

      Then I realized you probaly meant that it could not tell if you had read an email locally, which is quite sad, if true.

      Yes, locally. Sad, indeed.

  2. No web mail by argee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I abhor mail clients that work by publishing your email as web pages (most gMail, Hotmail etc). I also do not like HTML in my mail, nor do I like linked
    pictures and graphics. I use Thunderbird for my (Linux) computer, and K9 for Android, although I have also used AquaMail for Android.

    1. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey guys, I found the luddite!

      BINGO!

      We're done here. Thread's over. You can all go home. X^D

    2. Re: No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same setup, actually. Works extremely well.

    3. Re:No web mail by alexo · · Score: 1

      AquaMail doesn't do LDAP or CardDAV, wanting instead to use my address-book for everything, which is not what I want.

      Is K-9 better in that respect?

    4. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey guys, we found the noob whose computer is always getting hacked and infected, and who still falls for spam and that Nigerian email scam.

    5. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's better if it is served over some protocol other than https? It's email a.k.a. webmail. It is being served over a public server whether you want it to or not. Derp.

    6. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very funny. I use gmail; have for more than a decade. I remove email clients as best I can. Some idiot imbedded parts of evolution in Gnome; a simple database for a calendar function (like The SimpleDB Database System) would be just fine. Likely there are many simple DBs including a flat file. Date, time, event, log, next recurring. For a calendar that is really all of us need. Create a new file, add event, append the previous file and delete the old file. Look up of recent event is quick as they are likely on top of the stack as you don't need to read the entire file. Add the evolution for office like functions i.e. a server not a desktop.

      Oddly email service in the 'old days' was torturous. I had an officer worker that printed every email, filed the printouts (waste of paper) and used up about 24% of our server's hard drive because she wouldn't delete old mail. Then she complained it took a long time to see new mail. That was a program on a Sun Solaris system. They appended new mail to the end of the mail file so our server had to read in seven years of her mail, making everyone else wait for memory and virtual memory to catch up. Annoying beside a talk with her I had a talk with her boss. We, system admin are there to serve, not help pack rats. Oddly her disk space usage dropped as did many others in development. I didn't even consult my boss in IT about what I was going to do. It seemed the rational solution. We kept nightly incremental backups, a total weekly back; off site to boot. Like a two hour drive away off site for the tapes and they were copied before bringing past tapes back. Very cautious.

      I don't use my mail client or banking while not in a secure environment. I don't trust. Considering all the breaks in security of our personal information over the last decade likely my caution is warranted and I am not the paranoid son in the family. That would be my younger brother who carries a gun and uses some messaging app Apple created for their pads. It adds all sorts of extraneous stuff, likely chewing up the nation's bandwidth to advertise for Apple. If I already paid for the pad why do I need to pay for advertising for Apple too? I also don't use any social media apps; I have a tiny presences on G+ but I visit twice a year. See where that stuff has gotten our idiot president! Better to say nothing and be assumed a fool than speak and be prove you are a fool.

    7. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elm is all you need.

    8. Re:No web mail by lucm · · Score: 1

      I also do not like HTML in my mail, nor do I like linked pictures and graphics.

      Are you one of those people who reply to HTML with plain text, and who use *stars* and _underscore_ to emphasize things since bold and italic are unavailable in plain text?

      When I get one of those email I always feel like one-upping the sender by replying with direct uuencoding.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    9. Re:No web mail by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      AquaMail doesn't do LDAP or CardDAV, wanting instead to use my address-book for everything, which is not what I want.

      Sounds like you need DAVdroid. It makes your CardDAV directory available to any app that needs to work with addresses: your address book (into which it syncs your directory), email apps, etc.

      https://f-droid.org/en/packages/at.bitfire.davdroid/

      (It's also available through Google Play, if you prefer that source.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really unable to articulate your thoughts without resorting to using bold and italics? Perhaps when you grow up you'll learn how to control your words and emotions better.

    11. Re:No web mail by houghi · · Score: 1

      I hate HTML in Email. I hate top posting. I hate Images in my emails, especially from companies who use it to track me even if just to see if I read their email. (Not talking about spammers here)

      I used Mutt almost exclusive till a while ago. I now use a web interface with Roundcune. The advantages (YMMV) to me are that I have the same interface all the time, no matter if I am on a local machine, a new installed machine, at work or on a friends PC, independent of the OS I am on.

      It is much easier to navigate from folder to folder and see if there is mail in a new folder or not. Much easier than with mutt (with the added extent ion of being able to see the mail folders). I just get my mail from my provider with fetchnmail and sort it with procmail. Sorting is easy, because I use a lot of aliasses. For each company or website I work with I use company1.tlt@example.net and company2.tld@example.net.

      I then filter in folders like e.g. friends, financial, stores, mailinglists, generieric websites, spam, ...

      So now I am able to easily see the different mailboxes and if I want to read them or if it can wait. I do not see images unless I tell it to show them.

      And about the HTML: I do hate it. Unfortunately this is how others send their mail to me and to me the communication is more important than the form. So if people send it in HTML, I will get it that way. Does not mean that a reply will be send that way.

      That said, on my phone I use BlueMail with Imap to my home server. As I do not use it that often (only if I have no access to anything else and I expect an urgent email) I will just look at the specific email and not even use it to reply.
      That one unfortunately shows the images. As I do not use it often (perhaps 2 - 3 times a week) I am too lazy to find anything else and using ssh on a phone is even worse.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their response is instantly readable by anyone using a standard ascii character set, whereas you're pursuing the route of obfuscation.

      Who's being childish here?

    13. Re: No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still use Elm too

    14. Re:No web mail by alexo · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I want to avoid.

      I want my phone addressbook separate from my CardDAV for multiple reasons.

    15. Re:No web mail by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Are you one of those people who reply to HTML with plain text, and who use *stars* and _underscore_ to emphasize things since bold and italic are unavailable in plain text?

      Those are not stars. I take it you're visually inclined, and that reading and writing isn't your strength?

    16. Re:No web mail by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I hate HTML in Email.

      Honestly, the only people that don't are marketers.

      That said, on my phone I use BlueMail with Imap to my home server. That one unfortunately shows the images. As I do not use it often (perhaps 2 - 3 times a week) I am too lazy to find anything else and using ssh on a phone is even worse.

      I use Apple's mail app on my phone. It does not show images nor any other remote content. I do the same on my desktop and laptop. It greatly speeds up reading email.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:No web mail by hawk · · Score: 1

      > to emphasize things since bold and italic are unavailable in plain text?

      Actually, we do that because we've been doing it since a time when there *was* no standard to trigger inverse video, blink, or whatever (if anything) your terminal offered as an emphasis mode.

      We've just never changed . . .

      hawk

    18. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to tell me that some email clients have the option to do HTML style markup? Yech.
      I've never had an HTML email that didn't come from a marketing company. All my personal emails are plain text.
      Of course I use stars and underscore.

    19. Re:No web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? HTML has no place in email. As for uuencode, as long as you don't mess up the endline formatting (dos/unix - long story, long time ago, much pain) I'm happy.

    20. Re:No web mail by lucm · · Score: 1

      Are you really unable to articulate your thoughts without resorting to using bold and italics? Perhaps when you grow up you'll learn how to control your words and emotions better.

      Where did I say or even imply that? Maybe before telling people to grow up you could consider improving your reading skills.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    21. Re:No web mail by lucm · · Score: 1

      Those are not stars.

      Sorry I didn't mean to trigger aspies with that comment.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    22. Re:No web mail by arth1 · · Score: 1

      begin 644 -
      ;22!T;W1A;&QY(&%G<F5E('=I=&@@=&AA="X*
      `
      end

    23. Re:No web mail by lucm · · Score: 1

      Actually, we do that because we've been doing it since a time [...]

      So what? I started my career working on HP3000 and IBM COPICS. That didn't stop me from adopting new computer thingies as they appeared, and HTML emails is one of them.

      HTML offers a richer experience: hyperlinks, pictures, etc. Rejecting that because it's not "how we used to do it" sounds a lot like either a failure to adapt or an Amish perspective on life.

      Anyways we're not talking about a flavor of the week kind of thing, HTML has been around for 30 years; it's old enough that most email servers support sending both text and html.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  3. Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Outlook 2013

    1. Re:Outlook by krygny · · Score: 1

      LOOKOUT!!

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    2. Re:Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have used pretty much all of them at this point. Outlook is the one to use. The rest are too stripped down with missing features or the GUI tries to be so minimalist it looks 'ugly' and is not clear what to do. Outlook desktop is *very* hard to beat. I gave all the others a fair shake. I would use them for several months. Then go back to outlook.

    3. Re:Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the hell did this annoying "to/from" bullshit start? It makes it hard to read and is ass-backward in terms of sentence and comprehension logic.

      You go FROM something TO something else.

    4. Re: Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you use 5:00pm Friday as a "dump shit onto someone else and on Monday say 'I mailed X about that last week.' "

      Nothing personal, a lot of inbox zero types do that without realizing it. Leads to others having a forward to oncall schlub and delete rule with autoresponse disclaiming resend Monday after 8:30am rule kick in.

  4. mutt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    if you don't know what or why, you won't like it...

    1. Re:mutt by fisted · · Score: 1

      if you don't know what or why, you won't like it...

      Have to disagree, I didn't know I want it before I discovered it (duh)

  5. I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by garcia · · Score: 1, Informative

    Over the years, I've used any number of email clients which were everything from POP clients to shell (mutt/pine with procmail) to webmail (tried em all, including my own hosted ones) to GUI (Groupwise/Outlook/Maill.app/etc).

    I haven't ever had a favorite, although Groupwise's detailed transparent tracking features were great to CYA, especially in a union environment where everyone was backstabbing one another. I currently use the latest Outlook (Mac) and it works ok enough for the desktop and I use any number of other clients on our Linux VMs for reading through job messages or scripting their sends (mutt, mail, etc).

    But the only thing I've ever stuck with is Inbox Zero, which I've been at least since before 2004 (when my GMail archive began). It's so incredibly worth it and doesn't require any special tools or client, only dedication.

    1. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by lucm · · Score: 2

      But the only thing I've ever stuck with is Inbox Zero, which I've been at least since before 2004 (when my GMail archive began). It's so incredibly worth it and doesn't require any special tools or client, only dedication.

      Just out of curiosity, have you tried not caring about email instead? Just have a casual look once or twice a day, and delete everything unread once a week. It's like getting out of jail.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a whitelist on my mail server, have for about 10 years. I rarely get unsolicited emails, it's a wonderful thing. Achieving "Inbox Zero" is not difficult at all.

    3. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you delete anything. Just mark it as unread. My inbox has like 4000+ mails but only new stuff is ever unread.

    4. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by garcia · · Score: 1

      I generally get between 200-300 emails a day at work, more than 75% of which require my attention. That method wouldn't work for me.

    5. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by swillden · · Score: 1

      How do you handle emails that you can't address right now?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by garcia · · Score: 1

      Once you're already at Inbox Zero, you can generally manage, in the immediate, whatever email comes through.

      Otherwise, in the case of the ~1% of emails which I cannot immediately deal with, they sit in my inbox until I can. If there's an unread email in my inbox it means it is of high importance and I need to keep looking at it until it's resolved.

    7. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by swillden · · Score: 1

      Once you're already at Inbox Zero, you can generally manage, in the immediate, whatever email comes through.

      Otherwise, in the case of the ~1% of emails which I cannot immediately deal with, they sit in my inbox until I can. If there's an unread email in my inbox it means it is of high importance and I need to keep looking at it until it's resolved.

      For me this is true for personal email, but not work, where I get hundreds of new messages per day, so the 1% I can't deal with immediately mean that I have several per day that have to sit there... pretty quickly this means I'm very far from inbox zero. Or would be. Google Inbox's ability to "snooze" threads until a future date or location is the only thing that makes it possible. I'm surprised that more MUAs haven't picked up this extremely valuable feature.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by garcia · · Score: 1

      I average 200-300 daily emails.

    9. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by swillden · · Score: 1

      So you have 2-3 per day that have to sit there until you can address them. If the delay until you can averages, say, five days, that means that you have 10-15 in your inbox all the time? I suppose if you can always deal with them by the end of the day it's not too bad. I usually can't.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:I don't have a favorite but I am Inbox Zero by lucm · · Score: 1

      I generally get between 200-300 emails a day at work, more than 75% of which require my attention.

      That's like an email to process every 2-3 minutes.... What do you do? Sell penis enlargement pills?

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  6. Easy by redmid17 · · Score: 2

    Inbox by Gmail Outlook for work (love the focused vs all mail option in mobile) Normal Gmail and outlook are fine as well, but I actually read at least half of my emails from my phone. Desktop is mostly just work email and I have to use Outlook.

    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About all that gmail is usable for is light personal email use. It is a fucking joke for corporate email purposes. I just recently started at a company using gsuite as their email platform. It was a fucking mess. Thankfully they were full swing into a migration to outlook and we are now using outlook hosted with office 365.

      There is no way to be remotely productive with gmail if you are dealing with a torrent of email that comes in most corporate environments. Love or hate outlook. I for one am glad to be back on the outlook client where I can be more productive with my email.

  7. me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use RoundCube with my own Linux email server.

  8. In Korea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only old people read Slashdot!

  9. Gnus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really nothing else even coming close. One of those Emacs-based solutions without alternative.

    1. Re:Gnus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Email, blogs, news all sorted, filtered and displayed as I like it, and for best further use.

  10. Anything BUT web mail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Web mail is a horrible idea.

    Any local mail client is generally tolerable.

    Best if it includes PGP support. (And yes I'm aware of the recent headline, and no, it doesn't obsolete or invalidate the desirability of email encryption).

  11. Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    my Office 365 subscription provides a great toolset including an email client with desktop and phone variants. Works great! Especially when backed with an Exchange server.

  12. for a dedicated client by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i use Seamonkey suite, it is a browser & email client, and a basic bare bones WYSIWYG html editor and IRC client, (the emacs of the browser world)

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:for a dedicated client by jonwil · · Score: 2

      I also use SeaMonkey and LOVE it. If I wasn't so busy with other stuff, I would become a contributor and write some code for it and help keep it alive.

    2. Re: for a dedicated client by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I use Seamonkey as my primary browser, but not the email component. The Composer component works perfectly withe the browser component to cut-and-paste web content into nice local html files. Then you can open said files with the browser and use the 'edit' button to continue to clean them up and add to them. The composer, with it's 'preview' and 'view html' tabs lets you freeze out and eliminate active web content from your saves.

      The table building capability of Composer lets you drag and drop web content into your saves and organize things. If I could only have one high-level piece of software on a machine it would be Seamonkey.

    3. Re:for a dedicated client by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Should be pointed out that SeaMonkey and Thunderbird share a lot of code to do with mail and newsgroups and are actually similar.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:for a dedicated client by dryeo · · Score: 1

      They need all the help they can get as most of the developers time is spent on keeping up with Mozilla (Firefox) changes.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    5. Re:for a dedicated client by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd modernize the skin a bit. It doesn't work right on a 4k or 5k display. Had terrible problems on the Mac with seamonkey. I think the netscape 6 era is over. I like the idea of a suite but it needs to be a little more modern looking or at least have bigger buttons and new UI elements so it looks semi current.

    6. Re:for a dedicated client by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      i use Seamonkey suite, it is a browser & email client, and a basic bare bones WYSIWYG html editor and IRC client, (the emacs of the browser world)

      Are you saying it's a crappy editor?

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  13. Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After not using Outlook for almost two decades, I decided to upgrade my Thunderbird to Outlook. Big mistake! Major downgrade.

    I'm going back to Thunderbird ASAP, the best email and calendar client that exists.

    1. Re:Thunderbird by acroyear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this - Thunderbird is old, and 'support' is relative (Zod only knows how much it is keeping up with the Gecko/Quantum html updates from Firefox's team), but it is solid, portable (sorry, Mac Mail), and doesn't suck by using a rendering engine incompatible with most other email systems (hello Outlook, still sitting on a MS Word rendering engine that's 8 years out of date).

      I also use Newton on Win10, Mac, and Android, but that's mostly so that I don't have to go and re-enter 9 email accounts/passwords when i just have to enter one. Tbird would be nice if it could do that, have one single login session that shared the other accounts the way Firefox and Chrome do.

      --
      "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
      -- Joe
    2. Re: Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate thunderbird. It has been really frustrating when updates happened that broke plug-ins, especially the calender ones. It is very unreliable.

      I switched to EM Client and never looked back.

  14. Favorite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all suck to one degree or another. But I am forced to use Outlook at work. Otherwise Gmail on my phone. But I don't use email to communicate much with anyone important. There are better ways.

    1. Re:Favorite? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      You need an email address for all ecommerce or any online account. There are better ways for that? What are they?

  15. Thunderbird... by vanyel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is the worst one out there, except for all the rest.

    1. Re:Thunderbird... by dyfet · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the state of email clients is really pretty awful as a whole.

    2. Re:Thunderbird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The default font in Thunderbird is god almighty horrible. Yes, it supports the basic features, but it looks like shit.

    3. Re: Thunderbird... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      If you have a problem with the font you should have your eyes examined.

      The fonts that are used by many web sites today are the worst, they are all fuzzy. Thunderbird has really sharp and easy to read characters.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Thunderbird... by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what issues people have with Thunderbird. It does everything I need. I can ignore the application for the most part and and just focus on my emails. As it should be.

    5. Re:Thunderbird... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The default font in Thunderbird is god almighty horrible. Yes, it supports the basic features, but it looks like shit.

      Change it, it's one advantage of a client, you have control.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re:Thunderbird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL

    7. Re:Thunderbird... by vanyel · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're probably on Linux; I'm on OSX, and

      * it frequently deadlocks on a mailbox so when you try to move a message into it, it simply does nothing. When you exit Thunderbird in this state, it hangs and you have to force kill it.

      * It occasionally goes into a mode where it's using 100% of the cpu and the user interface goes completely unresponsive (spinning color wheel) for 30seconds to a minute with no indication what it's doing. At other times, rather than being completely unresponsive, typing is echoed out at about 1 character every few seconds.

      Those are the main issues I have; the rest are more in line of "would be nice" features

    8. Re:Thunderbird... by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Personally, I had to stop using it because of performance issues. Nothing I tried fixed the periodic freezes that would lock the client up for 30 to 60 seconds or so. I would never have stopped using it except for that.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:Thunderbird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what they should do is design the entire mail interface inside a webpage browser, so you can have complete control.

    10. Re:Thunderbird... by spth · · Score: 1

      I use thunderbird on Debian GNU/Linux. My two main issues are:

      • It crashes once in a while, mostly when I click the send button after putting much effort into writing a long reply. I have learned to save the draft once in a while (or compose the text in a text editor, then copy it into thunderbird) in such situations now, but sometimes I forget. The crashes don't happen very frequently, on average about once per week, but can still be very annoying.
      • While the junk filter is ok for email, there is no support for junk filtering or even just killfiles in the newsreader.
    11. Re:Thunderbird... by coofercat · · Score: 1

      I'll add (on OSX):

      - Notifications for emails that don't exist (I think it makes a desktop notification before the spam filter has run)
      - Wrong email details in notifications
      - Spam filter that's either too aggressive or too feeble and doesn't seem to get anywhere in between, no matter how much training you give it

      Don't even get me started on calendar integration ;-)

      That said, it's still a million times better than the Apple mail thing, which is an abomination. I haven't yet found anything better, apart from, shock horror - Outlook. Although I've only used that with a corporate email server (and even that has lots of things that are terrible too), so I don't imagine it would be plain sailing using IMAP and whatever-calendar.

    12. Re:Thunderbird... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Anecdote 1: I am a Windows Thunderbird user with about 18 years worth of email in it, and it doesn't do any of these things.
      Anecdote 2: I am a Windows Outlook 365 user with about 5 years worth of email in it, and it does all of the things you listed. Actually, it did those things with 1 year of email in it.

    13. Re:Thunderbird... by brewthatistrue · · Score: 1

      Mozilla Corporation cut Thunderbird loose ~ 2007, and the primary developer started his own commercial version called PostBox.

      In their most recent version they added support for maildir in addition to mbox (a long requested feature on bugzilla).

      The source code appears to be available for older versions, but I'm unclear if they are contributing back to the master repository anymore, or just a fork.

      I bought it to support development, but I rarely use a client nowadays other than email provider's web client.

      I wonder if anyone else has tried it?

    14. Re:Thunderbird... by silvergeek · · Score: 1

      I use Thunderbird and like it except for one quirk (on the Mac version) that never gets fixed: When composing a new message it uses a format that doesn't work correctly. I need to switch the blank space between beginning and signature text from Paragraph format to Body Text format, and then delete (cmnd X) the "Dear John" and paste (cmnd V) the "Dear John". After that curious procedure, it accepts text as any well-behaved text editor should.

    15. Re:Thunderbird... by Maxthod · · Score: 2

      -> On MacOSX I use... Mail. I never like mail on the Web. And now MacOSX since on the Cloud. -> For servers (Debian), postfix/mail.

    16. Re:Thunderbird... by koick · · Score: 1

      The source code [postbox-inc.com] appears to be available for older versions, but I'm unclear if they are contributing back to the master repository anymore, or just a fork.

      Well, the reason I don't us it is, according to this:

      Postbox appears to be using a fork of version 9 of the Gecko layout engine used in both Firefox and Thunderbird, and have no plan to modernize it anytime soon. Having a stable version of Gecko makes it much easier to implement features such as vertical view with double rows like Outlook does. On the other hand it means at least 4 years worth of security fixes have not been added.

    17. Re:Thunderbird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using Evolution in KDE on Linux. We recently did an Exchange migration and the only plugins that allowed inter-operation with the new server were pay for only.

      Before the migration, Thunderbird was my absolute go to mail client.

  16. i sense wormsign. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should i answer to you in vim, emacs, or a cat-out-pipe through a telnet push using inline binary forged packet that can bounce behind inetd...? seriously, my fave was... sylpheedclaws-gtk

    1. Re:i sense wormsign. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Yes but which mail client do you use in emacs. There are about a dozen.

    2. Re:i sense wormsign. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      I still prefer a nice, customized install of Mutt .

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:i sense wormsign. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Client != service. dumb poll. again.

    4. Re:i sense wormsign. by arth1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes but which mail client do you use in emacs. There are about a dozen.

      Yes, but they all lack a decent editor...

    5. Re:i sense wormsign. by Jerry · · Score: 1

      "Yes, but they all lack a decent editor..."
      ROF, LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    6. Re:i sense wormsign. by eneville · · Score: 1

      Amen to that!

    7. Re: i sense wormsign. by tkalfigo · · Score: 1

      Brutal. Even on the slashdotometer scale.

  17. Mutt! by dyfet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because it doesn't expose my gpg encrypted email by loading messages into a web view...

    1. Re:Mutt! by jmccue · · Score: 2

      by far mutt for me, a distant second place is Thunderbird. Mutt is quick and easy, once in a great while I need to fire up Tbird ofor the occasional html email I need get to a 'hidden' link.

    2. Re:Mutt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I can't read it in mutt, it's probably not worth reading anyway.

      (Mutts piss all over pines and elms).

    3. Re:Mutt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shell script called mozilla.sh with:

      #!/bin/sh
      URL=$@
      firefox -remote "openurl(${URL}, new-tab)" || firefox "${URL}"
      sleep 15 .mailcap entry:

      text/html; /path/to/mozilla.sh %s

      Inside mutt, select the text/html from a multipart message, hit m ... firefox either spawns or opens a new tab in an existing instance.

    4. Re:Mutt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      elm here... In the If it's not text, it's not secure boat.

    5. Re:Mutt! by Athanasius · · Score: 1

      Yup, Mutt is still my primary email client. I do have a roundcube-based webmail available on that server as well though (mostly for other users, but sometimes there's that email that's HTML and is a pain in the ass to view with links/lynx/w3m/whatever so I sigh and use it). K-9 Mail on Android if I need to read it on the go.

      GMail gets occasional use as a 'throwaway' account (and I have an Android phone), but all email to it gets forwarded to the proper email account anyway.

    6. Re:Mutt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, mutt for me too. Though I used to enjoy my point system and qwk reader (golded, blue wave, I think) more. And later, slrn.

      And, er, with proper configuration you can use mutt to view html too, using an external viewer like lynx. thunderbird is a nice try like firefox is a nice try: It really sucks too much but "everyone" who doesn't use outhouse uses it. Too bad enigmail is spectacularly stupid and its developers are too. Try and see what it produces if you forward a multipart/alternative text+html email with encryption added. Anyhow, if you can use mutt you really don't need thunderbird.

      If you somehow cannot live without clickibunti then sylpheed might be worth a look. That one also doesn't do html in email, which is exactly right because html doesn't belong in email. Was a bit too happy to mark messages as "read" when moving other messages. I ran into problems with sylpheed's gpg support on a mixed lose64/lose32 system because gpgme does something stupid (well, windows does something stupid and gpgme doesn't compensate) and the ability to fix it (set an environment variable) got removed because the author thought "it doesn't make sense" to be able to do that on windows. No idea if that's been fixed or worked around in the meantime, it's been a while. And I went back to mutt, because mutt is just that tiny bit less stupid than everything else so far.

  18. Kmail. by pots · · Score: 1

    Kmail. Although, back when I used Windows I really liked The Bat. Among other things, it uninstalled cleanly - very few Windows programs like that. I wonder if they're still around...

    1. Re:Kmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is kmail better these days? I tried it years and years ago and it looked alright, but when I tried to use it for real it was bug ridden and didn't work as well as it seemed like it should have. I don't remember all the issues now, it's been years. I moved back to Thunderbird as a result though. Would give kmail another shot if it's been improved a lot since then.

    2. Re:Kmail. by gitano_dbs · · Score: 1

      Yep The Bat still alive from the Windows98 era till Windows 10. https://www.ritlabs.com/en/pro...

      Another one i liked was Agent mail and news integrated from http://www.forteinc.com/

    3. Re:Kmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KMail has gotten pretty damned good (personal opinion). The new EWS plugin makes Exchange usable, although it has a few quirks (no auto-refresh right now).

    4. Re:Kmail. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Yep The Bat still alive from the Windows98 era till Windows 10. https://www.ritlabs.com/en/pro...

      Another one i liked was Agent mail and news integrated from http://www.forteinc.com/

      I only used Agent with Windows, version 1.9 was my Usenet, e-mailer program for years, then 6 to connect to Google.

    5. Re:Kmail. by pots · · Score: 1

      When I used Mint (last week and the four years previous) I didn't have any problems with Kmail specifically, but Kmail's back-end, Akonadi, would periodically just stop working. That was annoying. I've recently switched to Neon and... had some trouble getting Akonadi working. But, now that it's running everything seems to be fine.

      That might not be very reassuring, but I think Kmail is worth the extra trouble. And, again, everything seems to be running fine now.

    6. Re:Kmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright thanks for the info!

    7. Re:Kmail. by Frank+Burly · · Score: 1

      I use Kmail (Kontact, actually) and still have the occasional hiccup where I have to restart Akonadi, but it used to be much, much worse.

    8. Re:Kmail. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I'd forgotten about The Bat!.. it was okay. Weird though.
      I use Thunderbird for everything now. It can be quirky but it works well enough.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  19. if you think webmail isbad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i used YAHOOpops for the longest time... what that was is a background service that effectively sat on a lan ipaddr and localhost ipaddr, pre-configured to login to your favorite yahoo webmail acct through http port 80 simulated web browsing requests, and then abstracted your webmail as a pop3/smtp host service. it worked awesome until recaptcha would interrupt your session and that means you had to open a browser to re-negotiate your yahoo login to continue your host simulated mail service.

    Ask me my favorite horror film.

    1. Re:if you think webmail isbad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your favorite horror film?

    2. Re:if you think webmail isbad. by lucm · · Score: 1

      i used YAHOOpops for the longest time... what that was is a background service that effectively sat on a lan ipaddr and localhost ipaddr, pre-configured to login to your favorite yahoo webmail acct through http port 80 simulated web browsing requests, and then abstracted your webmail as a pop3/smtp host service. it worked awesome until recaptcha would interrupt your session and that means you had to open a browser to re-negotiate your yahoo login to continue your host simulated mail service.

      This has to be the most horrible setup possible, short of using Lotus Notes

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:if you think webmail isbad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, you do know that yahoo STILL has IMAP and POP services available for their email. You dont need to use some middle man to scrap the web pages.

  20. Thunderbird by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    At home, Thunderbird with "View Message Body as Plain Text" and Javascript disabled (for messages from asinine senders that can only be viewed as HTML - grrr) to POP mail from ISP and Gmail. Never really been a fan of browser-based email clients, especially having to worry about browser/javascript exploits, etc..., but will periodically log directly into Gmail to permanently delete mail put into in the trash via the POP3 processing -- that should have actually been deleted, also grrr -- (still haven't decided if I'd like using IMAP instead).

    At work, MS Outlook on the desktop and "mailx" on Linux/Unix systems (usually for daemon messages I haven't forwarded).

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  21. What’s wrong with Outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has all the features i need, my company provides it to me and works for all of us.

    1. Re:What’s wrong with Outlook? by acroyear · · Score: 1

      it has an html engine that is based on Word, which means the rendering sucks even worse than IE.

      sure, internally it is just fine within your company, but 90% of the world trying to make emails for 90% of the world have to make really crappy emails in order to look even half-way readable on Outlook. their lack of changes in rendering have set the email client world behind just as bad as IE had for 3 Moore's Law generations before Firefox and Chrome finally started moving the web forward again.

      The standards for html and css are there, and Outlook has no intention of meeting them.

      The rest of the world would like to move forward, thank you very much.

      --
      "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
      -- Joe
    2. Re:What’s wrong with Outlook? by greenwow · · Score: 1

      winmail.dat

      Sucks having to several times a week copy attachments from users to a Linux machine so I can run tnef to extract their attachments.

    3. Re:What’s wrong with Outlook? by bjhavard · · Score: 2

      It uses Wingdings for emoticons which any standards compliant client renders as simple letters. For a long time I wondered why so many people finished their emails with a "J"...

    4. Re:What’s wrong with Outlook? by lucm · · Score: 2

      The standards for html and css are there, and Outlook has no intention of meeting them.

      It's even worse than most people would assume. Outlook is probably the last place on earth where HTML tables are still the only way to have some kind of control over the layout. You can have a team of designers creating a single web page that works well in all browsers on all major o/s, but they're still going to need a different, retarded design for Outlook.

      I don't understand how anyone at Microsoft can sleep at night knowing that they sell this piece of shit. HTML is a solved problem, there's at least 4 or 5 engines they could use if they don't want to port the one they have for edge, there's just no excuses for this laziness and nonchalance.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:What’s wrong with Outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their lack of changes in rendering have set the email client world behind...

      The standards for html and css are there, and Outlook has no intention of meeting them.

      That's a feature, not a bug. Putting up with HTML emails is bad enough. I don't want complex formatting or javascript emails, with a bazillion security bugs and phishing attempts and rendering crawling to a halt. Not to mention Google's AMP monstrosity. should be good enough for you. If anything, Outlook supports too much of HTML standard. If it could take down external uris, everyone's world would be better.

    6. Re:What’s wrong with Outlook? by Torvac · · Score: 1

      everything, the UI is a disaster.

    7. Re:What’s wrong with Outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a shit? HTML is not e-mail.

      If you want to visit a web page, go to this shit called a "Web Page Server" using your "Web Page Server Viewier".

      Do no send you web pages and pretend they are e-mail. HTML does not belong in email. So who gives a shit if outlook cannot do HTML in email. Sounds like a BIG PLUS to me ...

  22. Kmail by planarian · · Score: 0

    I've been using Kmail, KDE's default email client, for more than a decade. It integrates very well with online mail, address book, and calendar services. I haven't found anything else that does so many things so well. And of course it's perfectly integrated with the KDE desktop.

  23. PC Alpine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zero waiting for anything. Everything immediately accessible without even looking at the screen or reaching for a mouse.

    Message coloring and response rules

    Excellent IMAP interface

    Directory integration

    No malware / bullshit.

  24. Gmail...was? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not knowing anything about the "new" gmail (but disliking the attempt to replace it that rolled around a year or two ago), Gmail is my favorite. I never delete email, I never *want* to delete email, and i want a complete searchable history.

    I do want "zero unread", but not an empty inbox. If I see unread email I read it, unless it looks like spam in which case I mark it unread. Later if I have need of information I use the search feature. Neither MS Lookout nor Apple Mail can do this. The client who can give me gmail searchability, apple cloud security, a large quota and absolutely no snooping will win the war. Anything else is inferior and marketing bullshit.

  25. Sylpheed by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I first started using it on NetBSD but right now my client sits on a Windows 10 machine. It's in pkgsrc and should be available on any freenix.

    One of the nice things about Sylpheed is that it nests mail threads properly, so if you subscribe to ant mailing lists the threading flows properly.

  26. Thunderbird, K-9, RoundCube by crow · · Score: 1

    I use Thunderbird on my desktop. I used to use Evolution, as at the time it had better Exchange compatibility, which I thought I was going to need, but I got extremely frustrated with it. It was super slow moving messages into large folders (like when I archive my mail instead of deleting it), and it seemed I was always fighting bugs. Thunderbird has been a vastly superior experience.

    I will say that I'm not excited about Thunderbird, either. It does the job, but it feels clunky. It would be great to have better Exchange compatibility for the corporate environment.

    For my Android phone, I use K-9 mail. Even without the Doctor Who reference, it's a great mobile mail client. I have had trouble with it not noticing new mail and beeping at me like I've told it to--it was flawless until a year or so ago. I wonder if I have a setting wrong?

    I don't do a lot of webmail, but sometimes I want to bring something up on my car's browser (Model S). I used to use Squirelmail, which felt like a crude HTML wrapper on a text client, but after the recent browser update, I'm now able to use RoundCube, and it's much better. I haven't played with it too much, but so far it does everything I want.

    1. Re:Thunderbird, K-9, RoundCube by kwalker · · Score: 1

      The "super slow moving messages into large folders" isn't Evolution's or Thunderbird's fault, it's Exchange's fault. At least through Exchange 2010 (The last version I have experience with), folders with more than 20,000 messages in them cause Exchange to timeout and abort the connection. Outlook hides this by working in "offline" mode most of the time, regardless of what it tells you, and using its own s00p3r-s3kr1t protocol, while Evolution and Thunderbird have to stick to ActiveSync. But even then, it has trouble with large folders and ends up giving up eventually.

      Evolution's EWS module has gotten way better over the last few years. It still bloats up occasionally, hangs, and crashes occasionally, but as long as you can keep your folders under 20k messages each, it works quite well. You can even use GNOME Online Accounts to add an Exchange account, which will immediately tell Evolution where to sync e-mail, calendar, tasks, and notes.

      I've used K-9 Mail since FroYo, and I still do to this day. There is some kind of bug with Doze mode though. When that was introduced, its poling became extremely flaky, at least on wifi. Half the time I leave my house I get bombarded with all the e-mail that hasn't come through. My phone goes to LTE and suddenly they all flood in. I've seen a couple of release notes about better Doze compatibility, but it's still largely fail for me.

      Squirrelmail reminds me of the old RocketMail (Circa when Yahoo bought them). The interface for RoundCube is pretty nice though.

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    2. Re:Thunderbird, K-9, RoundCube by crow · · Score: 1

      No, the problem was Evolution. I was archiving mail into a folder for a busy mailing list, and it was getting increasingly painful. This was talking to an IMAP server running on the same system; I never ended up needing to interface with Exchange.

      I don't know the details of the IMAP protocols, but I think Evolution was doing far more work than was required, possibly re-scanning the folder before or after the move.

  27. ProtonMail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ProtonMail is run by people who think privacy is more important than just about anything else. It works great. It''s getting better all the time. It does cost money, but that's because unlike Google you are the customer and not the product that gets sold to their customers.

    1. Re: ProtonMail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Breathing fresh air is great. It lets your respiratory system metabolize oxygen and vent co2 as a waste product. I highly recommend dong it while using proton mail.
      Back to the point of the ask Slashdot...

      Do you recommend a mail client to access Proton mail?

    2. Re: ProtonMail! by Jetstream · · Score: 1

      Last I knew, ProtonMail is not set up for access by any desktop client. Other than their webmail, I think the only option is their own mobile app.

    3. Re: ProtonMail! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Last I knew, ProtonMail is not set up for access by any desktop client. Other than their webmail, I think the only option is their own mobile app.

      This is necessary because of their end to end encryption. Mail is encrypted and decrypted in the browser via JavaScript or in their own app. Using a third-party client wouldn't support this.

    4. Re: ProtonMail! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Don't believe the hype. They won't take paid signups over Tor with Monero - you can't get an account there without deanonymizing yourself. They want to be able to track you.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  28. Outlook desktop client by DogDude · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't found anything that comes close to Outlook (on the desktop... not the web). I use it with Exchange and IMAP accounts at the same time. Lots of features, and even more with Exchange accounts.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Outlook desktop client by digitect · · Score: 0

      I used Outlook right up until Microsoft decided to edit all my email last year. They edited every single link I'd placed (often deep links to manufacturer product info because of the work I do) to their servers! I'm still shocked that there wasn't a class action suit over this. How are they allowed to edit archived email, required by law to be retained as sent?!

      Now, Thunderbird. I'd used it for years a long time ago. Not terrible, it barely works for business. It's clunky, buggy, has weird fringe behaviors, and can't seem to do some basic tasks. But at least it doesn't secretly edit all my old email and new emails after I've just sent it!

      On Android, still the gMail client. Tried K9 but the interface was rough.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    2. Re:Outlook desktop client by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      until Microsoft decided to edit all my email last year

      You have more details that I can Google ? This much yields nothing specific.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    3. Re:Outlook desktop client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using eM Client on my windows desktops after using (a love/hate relationship) Outlook for years. What finally broke that relationship was some 'enhancements' that MS pushed out into Office 360 that broke Outlook -- remained broken for months while various parties wrung their hands. On android its GMail. Tried the MS android 'Outlook' but removed it after a couple of hours. eM Client has provided the most Outlook-like experience for my taste.

      One thing I have been doing for years is using Mailstore archiving tool. I run it every so often and archive everything. It is easily searchable and will delete old messages in the external files when it loads them in (gateable). This has made the choice of email clients independent of my historic messages -- and has allowed me to move from Exchange through Thunderbird, various webmails, Hotmail/outlook and so forth with little concern. Mail messages and attachments are compressed -- and there are backup copies in a few other places in my local network.

    4. Re: Outlook desktop client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure he means that when his mail provider upgraded versions of exchange and migrated his old mail, the links in his imap/exchange hosted mail honored the server side "scan links for malware" check box.

    5. Re:Outlook desktop client by digitect · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about SafeLinks. Microsoft edits and re-routes every link in an Outlook email so that it obscures the original URL and routes it through their servers. This is under the pretense of safety to see if they can get away with it. I first noticed it in December 2017 and I still haven't seen any news articles for concern, so they apparently are going to succeed.

      Microsoft pretends to offer this to "prevent malware and phishing attacks" but we all know they are primarily doing this to track user behavior. Gmail also tracks user behavior, but they don't edit your email because they host the email in the first place. And yes, I know that some versions of Outlook do this and some don't, depending on your version and level. But I don't know how it is legal for any email client to literally edit what I'm sending without my knowledge, falsely mis-representing me, and breaking the legal requirement many entities have to retain data to the statute of limitations.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    6. Re:Outlook desktop client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I've never seen a worse email client than Outlook.

    7. Re:Outlook desktop client by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're talking about. We've been on Exchange/Outlook for about a decade, and have never seen what you're describing.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    8. Re: Outlook desktop client by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Thanks, if there were news articles , my first attempt at googling would have succeeded.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  29. Mailspring takes the cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use it on Windows 10 and Linux
    For my Android phone, it is the Outlook app and the Gmail client

  30. Outlook and Gmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gmail does have POP3/SMTP addresses so one can run Outlook on the desktop.

    https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7104828?hl=en

    1. Re: Outlook and Gmail. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And why do you want to use Outlook? It's a pretty crappy client with a junk mail filter that's bad.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re: Outlook and Gmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart folders. Keep everything in the inbox but never read it unless it matches one of my filters. And they are much better than regular folders because the same email can match in several

    3. Re: Outlook and Gmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really matter how good Outlook's spam filter is if you're using it after Gmail's excellent spam filter?
      Even if you don't train it yourself by flagging stuff as spam for Gmail, you'll still get the benefit of everything everyone else has marked spam.

    4. Re: Outlook and Gmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it's a mail client that actually has QA standards and testing to ensure a good user experience. I know what Outlook will do when it loads my 100k message inbox. I don't know what Thunderbird is going to do because it doesn't support large mailboxes very well. K9 is great, but the UI leaves much to be desired. If you are a utility user and wipe your ass with 1-ply toilet paper, then Outlook is not for you. But Outlook does everything K9 does with less bloat, a streamlined UI, and provides calendar support for no additional charge.

      I understand this is slashdot, but at least try to make an effort when denouncing microsoft products. There is literally no desktop contender in the email space. Period.

    5. Re: Outlook and Gmail. by shanen · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to use Outlook? To get away from the google. I'd prefer weak, old evil to the strong and fresh stuff. Microsoft actually has the resources to offer a superior email client--but they don't and I suppose they never will.

      Upon reflection, I now feel like the Ask Slashdot question is ill formed. I am not one to have favorites, but there are definitely good and bad features of some email programs, and I could list a number of important features that I've been wanting and even advocating for over the years. Still waiting.

      By the way, regarding the comments about filtering, these days my Gmail false positive rate is running around 10%, though the false negatives are still near the usual 1%. There are REAL solutions to the spam problems, but filtering is proven to be a minor annoyance to the spammers. Hint: Where is your pump-and-dump stock scam spam?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    6. Re: Outlook and Gmail. by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      And why do you want to use Outlook? It's a pretty crappy client with a junk mail filter that's bad.

      Yeah, come on, why was the guy using Outlook? Was that a joke where the humour didn't come through?

      I'm more of a hardware guy than a coder. I have been offered precisely one software development job, in the late 1990s.

      My programming style is so much brute force and ignorance that Microsoft once offered me a job. On the Outlook development team.

      I use bubble sorts, for Christ's sake. You cannot make this shit up.

      Don't blame me for Outlook: I laughed at their HR, knew I'd be a bad fit for an employer I didn't respect, knew my programming skills and style tend toward the assembler and the soldering iron. I politely declined the offer. And then I went back to playing with the flight simulator Easter Egg hidden in Microsoft Excel.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    7. Re:Outlook and Gmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, you should ALWAYS use IMAP. POP3 is easily corruptible and highly inefficient.

      Second, GMail works fine with many clients if you use IMAP or POP3 and do not have single sign on from a corporate setup or two factor auth. Otherwise, you are SOL. It will not work with thunderbird in a corporate configuration with SSO. It does work with apple mail and there is an add-on for outlook to make it sort of work.

      Google forces you to use GMAIL clients on phone platforms for this reason too with SSO.

    8. Re: Outlook and Gmail. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      And some of us would argue the only thing Outlook does well, maybe, is integrate with Exchange for calendaring and email. In every other way it's a substandard client running on a substandard OS (marketshare is meaningless from a technical assessment) And to state that Outlook has less bloat than something else makes me question the quality of that something else more than anything else.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  31. MH / xmh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the modular design, so much more powerful

  32. M2 by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Loved the integrated M2 client from Opera of yesteryear. Opera has promised to deliver an updated standalone version, but it's been a long time and I've given up hope.

    1. Re:M2 by LaissezFaire · · Score: 1

      I really liked M2. The folder view feature was a better previous than gmail labels, I thought. It even had SSL-client authentication, which we used at work. I still use the 1.0 standalone client for some throw-away email addresses.

    2. Re:M2 by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      I've been using the standalone and it's still good except it doesn't handle ical files which is sort of an issue for meeting notifications

    3. Re:M2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Opera 12.16 for years just for its email client (and I'm still using it). Love its label feature. Can't live without it.

  33. Web Mail by djbckr · · Score: 1

    I use gmail, and my own domain on a gmail account. It works for me. It's responsive, the UI doesn't really suck, the search capabilities are great to find an old, obscure email sent years ago. When I change computers, I don't have to worry about where all my email is locally. It's just all there.

    I haven't used Thunderbird in at least 5 years, maybe more.

  34. Eudora by Tihstae · · Score: 2

    All others are imitations of this best ever email client.

    1. Re:Eudora by flug · · Score: 1

      I'm still on Eudora as well. It looks like my oldest sent mail there is 1/29/1995 and I've got a few pieces of incoming mail from 12/1994.

      For various reasons, it's becoming gradually less & less tenable with time, but it's still my daily driver.

    2. Re:Eudora by PuddleBoy · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the old days. I used the Eudora email client and the Eudora Internet Mail Server. The client had options up the wazoo and was utterly reliable. The mail server was stripped down, but would run for years unattended on minimalist old hardware.

      Sigh...

    3. Re:Eudora by shanen · · Score: 1

      Glad to see the references to Eudora. It certainly was my favorite in its time, though I wouldn't go as far as some of the comments here...

      Too bad there wasn't a better economic model in place to keep Eudora alive. Part of the general problem of corporate cancers seeking profit (instead of satisfied users seeking cost recovery for services received).

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:Eudora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG, I SO miss Eudora. I kept using it up until it wouldn't run on my Mac anymore. Now I use Thunderbird for personal email and Outlook for corporate. K9 is best for me on the Android. Rackspace is my email server.

  35. Gmail, and Never Delete an Email, Read them All by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 0

    I have been using Gmail for many many years, and almost never delete an email. However, I read them all. The Gdrive is nice for sharing videos and storing files I want to reach from elsewhere, and the calendar is one of the best out there. I share calendars with several, and having them all show at once on the same display is super. The way Google automatically routes emails to specific folders works very well for me. I rarely delete an email (mostly just delete spam), and gladly pay Google $5/year for extra space to hold my 27,000 plus emails. If you ever sent me an email, I can find it years later. Comes in handy, both for personal emails and for critical data received from businesses.

    1. Re:Gmail, and Never Delete an Email, Read them All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yikes

  36. Claws Mail by sombragris · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Claws Mail. It's light on resources, fast, stable, and can deal with gigabyte-sized mailboxes without a hiccup. Moreover, it uses the MH mailbox format, where each email message is a single plaintext file so it's very flexible and if necessary it allows for straightforward manipulation directly from the shell. There's even a nice book available on it.

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
    1. Re:Claws Mail by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      +10 on that. Started using Claws (sylpheed) years ago on my FreeBSD boxes and haven't looked back. It's what I use at home, and what my wife uses, too. Since we're forced into an exchange server at work, I use thunderbird on my Ubuntu machine (I'm in the only person at work who's main machine is Linux). There's is much to be said for an email client that saves all the files as text.

  37. mutt - because it sucks less. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using webmail puts your email in the cloud, and your webmail provider can spread it to other company's clouds.

    I use mutt so all my email is stored on my desktop. I use a mutt mailcap that is pointed at chrome for displaying text/HTML stuff.

    For my smartphone and laptop, I connect to the desktop, and using a different mutt mailcap, a text/html is sent from the desktop to the laptop (or the phone) via an ssh-tunnel and then into chrome on the laptop (or phone). I use cobbled-together scripts using nc (netcap) to send email message sections from the desktop to the laptop (or phone).

    fetchmail WAS used in the past to get my mail from Comcast's mail server, but I ended up rolling my own fetchmail-like utility. In both cases, I use POP3.

    The thing I'm thinking about is to hook my fetchmail-like utility and encrypt the incoming email.

    ~ S_T ~

  38. Emacs VM by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    The Emacs VM mail client has a lot of really unique features, including the best message threading of any Email client I've ever worked with. You can kill entire threads or sort them into folders from anywhere in the thread. It also has folders support because it was made by people who actually use their email. It supports encryption and message signing with pgp or gpg. And if you really want to bam your mail up a notch, you can hook in the MIT Remebrance Agent, which can index your messages and other documents and dedicate a portion of your window to similar things in the index. Even it its current decades-old form, once you get used to that, it's really hard to go back to outlook. Or gmail.

    What it doesn't do is email across all your devices and it does seem to occasionally lose my email box completely, which is why I'm not using it now, but I'm starting to get the itch to dust it off and try it again.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Emacs VM by diekhans · · Score: 1

      Yes, emacs vm is awesome. Google make a pretty good spam filter, but other than that, vm is far more powerful.

    2. Re:Emacs VM by Brooklynoid · · Score: 1

      How do you edit your std's? I just take antibiotics for mine.

    3. Re:Emacs VM by rthille · · Score: 1

      CRISPR

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  39. Thunderbird by rnturn · · Score: 1

    I've tried others--Kmail for a couple of years, Evolution before that--and occasionally try new versions of those older favorites but I haven't found any new features and/or behavior that keeps me from going back to T-bird.

    I do try and keep my Inbox cleared and everything filed but usually seem to have a few dozen emails that I haven't yet filed away at any given time. I don't do any automatic filing using filters as I find the filters too unreliable. I do an initial scan and drag the easily identifiable junk into my Junk folder where it is scanned and the sender IP addresses used to update my spam filter. Then the remainder gets read and filed according to topic or tossed if it's something I'm not currently interested in, won't be able to attend, etc. Only takes a few minutes on most days. (Ctrl-click, Ctrl-click, drag make short work of most filing.)

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  40. Thunderbird, with short-term smartphone support by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    I use Thunderbird on a Mac. It's allowed me to keep and organize my email locally, and support my previous move from Windows to OS X/MacOS, retaining the UI and metadata (no import with unknown conversion lossage). It's configured to download and delete my email every 10 minutes or so. My smartphone is configured to monitor the server using its built-in email client. So I can deal with important messages quickly on my phone before they move to my Mac, but they're safely off the server relatively quickly. If I need longer email access on my phone, I just shut down my Mac. When I no longer need the longer access, I just restart my Mac and it catches up. Thunderbird's also configured to use my Mac's Contacts, which is synced with my smartphone.

    Any such system has compromises; I chose one that prioritizes getting the email off the server and to my backed-up Mac, while secondarily allowing most functions from my phone. MS Office 365's Outlook now offers a cross-platform solution to Thunderbird that would also work for me, but I don't want its bloat; I know how to use it well from work but choose not to at home.

  41. Eudora by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    I've got email going back 20 years, a ton of different email accounts, numerous scripts and automation, and damned if I'm going to move all that to another client unless I have to.

  42. Pine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pine

    1. Re: Pine by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      A step up from mailx.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  43. EM Client and Airmail by RelaxedTension · · Score: 1

    On the Windows I use EM Client. Decent interface, much faster than Outlook and doesn't bog down the whole machine. It also supports Caldav and Carddav which my server supports.

    On the Mac, it's Airmail.

    1. Re:EM Client and Airmail by RandomActOfKindness · · Score: 1

      Yup, EM on Windows here too.

    2. Re:EM Client and Airmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yeah! Airmail for mac

  44. eM, surprisingly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried out the eM mail client, and even though there were a few small hiccups, I decided to stick with it. A year plus later I still like it.

  45. Gnus by wispoftow · · Score: 1

    My favorite client is Gnus. Not only does it handle my email, but also does nntp -- especially awesome when paired with Gmane/Gwene for following mailing lists.

    Once it is set up, it's a great way to read, compose, and script email in the environment that you're spending all day in anyway -- Emacs.

  46. Agreed by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I used Eudora forever and even way past when they quit supporting it.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  47. Usable but there needs to be a better alternative by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    Outlook is my primary mail client that I use for the reasons you cite. Mac Mail (on my Airbook) is a second choice when I'm on the road.

    Personally, I like being able to send/receive HTML mail - a picture is worth a thousand words and formatting/emphasizing/listing/etc. makes things more readable.

    Honestly, I don't love it and I feel like there should be better ones out there but I haven't found them. If I could find a Linux mail client I really liked, I'd probably drop Windows (and Microsoft) all together.

  48. evolution-ews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's the only reliably working outlook client on Linux. The calendering features of thunderbird are buggued beyond imagination.

  49. Apple Mail is the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing comes close.

    1. Re:Apple Mail is the best by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's the best, but it's more than good enough that I never had to search for alternatives.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re: Apple Mail is the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Apple Mail on my personal machines, but company policy dictates that I use Outlook 2016 on Windows 7 for work. Search is almost unusable and contact management is needlessly complex. Hell, even getting version information is unintuitive.

  50. Only old people still use email... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or your behind the times employer still thinks it is important...

    1. Re: Only old people still use email... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Only young people haven't grown up yet.

      Don't worry, the rest of us don't. You'll figure it out eventually.

  51. Eudora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. It still runs on Windows 10, over a decade since the last update.

    I'll probably have to switch to something like Thunderbird when MSFT finally pulls the plug. Would love to hear other's experiences with switching from it.

  52. Outlook by Rafe+Langston · · Score: 2

    After switching to Windows from Lubuntu as my primary OS (it's way more practical to use Windows with my work and school) I also switched to using Outlook and, now that I've gotten used to it, it's hands-down my favorite. I honestly don't think I could go back to anything else.

    As for "Inbox Zero," it's a weekly goal that I try to, and usually do, reach by Friday at 6pm when I typically "clock-out" of the work week (as a rule, I don't check email on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays that I don't work). If I don't hit "Inbox Zero" I feel like I left the week unfinished.

  53. Re:Usable but there needs to be a better alternati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try evolution-ews 2.28.2 pretty complete exchange client

  54. Eudora by fhic · · Score: 1

    Version 7. It's only 25 years old and my boughten copy has almost paid for itself! It still works and I haven't found anything I like better.

  55. anyone remember Pegasus email client by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    i used it some around the turn of the century then got interested in Linux and Pegasus is a windows app so i forgot about it for years until this email client thread opened up, just did a google search and the last stable release was 4.72 (21 April 2016; 2 years ago)

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:anyone remember Pegasus email client by hyades1 · · Score: 2

      I might wind up going back to Pegasus. It was my first serious e-mail client, and looking back, I think it just might have been the best.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re:anyone remember Pegasus email client by johnsie · · Score: 1

      Pegasus was great. Downloaded it again last year for nostalgia reasons to see if it was still usable.

    3. Re:anyone remember Pegasus email client by johnsie · · Score: 1

      It almost plays well with Wine. I think I got to the point where you connect and the it froze up on me. Would definitely consider going back to it on a Windows box.

    4. Re:anyone remember Pegasus email client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using it as my client of choice since the late 1980s or very early 1990s, initially as a client for Novell Netware mail. Beyond it, there's netmail.

    5. Re:anyone remember Pegasus email client by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      Yep, back when our shop "mandated" MS Windows (I used OS/2), I used Pegasus rather than Outlook. Before we switched to an Exchange server, I had migrated to Linux and Claws mail, then Thunderbird once we implemented an Exchange server.

    6. Re:anyone remember Pegasus email client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's another vote for Pegasus. Have used it as my only email client for perhaps 15 years, through multiple versions and multiple laptops. I have to use gmail for interaction with one specific company (on a separate email account) and I am constantly amazed at how much easier it is for me to do things with Pegasus as compared to the hassle of gmail, and having to work via the web. Gmail's automatic indexing & search are nice, but they don't make up for the drawbacks.

      Not to mention the idea that I have at least a fighting chance at privacy when the email isn't being routinely read by google.

    7. Re:anyone remember Pegasus email client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do too, it was part of my first exposure to email and internet in 1997, just as it was taking off in the modern graphical form we know it today.

      The entire school rolled out Pegasus for students and it was very popular, with the general use computer lab seeing a constant stream of kids at every workstation all through the day.

      I remember my friend dumping his girlfriend by email, which was remarkable as they were sitting next to each other in the computer lab at the time... ...kids today don't have a monopoly on being dicks.

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. My setup by packrat0x · · Score: 3

    IMAP server:
    dovecot

    Clients:
    Seamonkey (Linux / Windows boxes)
    Outlook (Windows boxes)
    Mutt (remote ssh)

    Flexible and Reliable.

    --
    227-3517
    1. Re:My setup by flightmaker · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu server running 24/7 on my own hardware in my own house
      My own domain name
      IMAP server running on Dovecot

      I just use Evolution on Linux Mint/Mate for my email client. It's easy to set up email directories and filters to sort messages automatically. Sometimes it seems a little slow but maybe that's due to this Atom netbook I'm running it on. It "just works" no matter whether I'm at home or away.

    2. Re:My setup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dovecot + postfix.
      Clients:
      Main: kmail,
      Work: osx thunderbird, mutt.
      Emergency: squirrelmail.

  58. Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gmail's web client is super confusing the way it holds and represents "threads" of emails. I find it near impossible to "follow" an email thread with it, its super confusing. The best way to view emails imho is via time stamp. So I set outlook to have zero groupings and each email is just a single line, and I use the fields to sort and find/locate emails, sorting by subject with date ascending for tracking threads, and finding the right email to reply to. God knows what the devs at gmail were thinking because other than that the client is quite good.

  59. Personally used TTYs. by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thunderbird for desktop, Pine/AlPine for shell, K-9 Mail for a phone.

    Webmail is for the birds. And I'm not organized or disciplined enough for the "Inbox Zero" cult.

    Before DSL and before dial-up PPP connections to the Internet, we used shell connections.

    Manually dialing a rotary phone, placing it on the suction cups, and waiting to connect... at 300 baud.

    Again, no PPP, so basically all I had was a telnet session that broke whenever my mom tried to make a phone call. I had to read my e-mail and then manually decode my attachments and save them in my home folder before I could view them.

    My first Internet connection was though a 300 baud modem and a DEC LA-36BK teletypewriter, my first e-mail address was a .uucp address.

    I liked Pine and a little known thing called Bank Street Writer.

    1980s.

    E-mail was designed to be text-based only.

    I still live the old-school text-based e-mail, using alpine on openSUSE. And strangely enough, I never get any Windows viruses.

    If you have a problem with that, then you and I will not be doing business.

    Pine is amazing. It goes through a lot of teletype paper, so you want a glass terminal. Over 20 years after I first saw it, I'm still using it.

    It screws with people when you can reply to your e-mail with a smartphone or a teletype. :)

    Lawrence

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re: Personally used TTYs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, nobody else can send mail on their phone...

    2. Re:Personally used TTYs. by legojenn · · Score: 1

      I prefer pine. An ios version would be somewhat nifty.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    3. Re:Personally used TTYs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pine was good, but its ties to the wu-imapd got strange. Mark Crispin, one of the authors of wu-imapd, pine, and the IMAP spec got very odd about insisting that every file in $HOME/ be considered a mail file by the daemon, and pine insisted in treating $HOME/mail as the location of IMAP files, with no option of the IMAP daemon and the pine to consider the same working directory as the mail folders. Chaos ensued, especially when Mark kept *altering the source code* to break the patches I used to publish for this.

      It also got very weird because the wu-imapd source code, which included pine, had an internal variant at Washington University that included SSL. But the public code did not. I still remember Mark accusing me of stealing their code because my web page and published notes pointed people to where they could get SSL patches from a European web site. See, back then, exporting encryption was even more stringently regulated than it is now. *I* thought that running EMAP without SSL was frankly insane. Fortunately, "dovecot" exists now for a good IMAP daemon. And alpine, the more modern version of Pine, is pretty good.

    4. Re: Personally used TTYs. by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nobody else can send mail on their phone...

      LOL... ssh into one of your hosts from your phone and try using vi to compose an e-mail. I loved the TI-99/4A but the stock Android keyboard on my phone might be the only thing I use(d) regularly with a more punishing QWERTY layout.

      Using that when your GMail app is working properly is like eschewing a perfectly functional house to sit in the woods and shit over a log. In other words, it's camping for geeks. You should try it sometime.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    5. Re: Personally used TTYs. by reanjr · · Score: 1

      It's a bit more like visiting the third world than it is camping.

    6. Re: Personally used TTYs. by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Is exporting encryption still regulated? I thought that went away sometime after triple DES.

  60. Windows7x64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eM Client

    Postbox

    Fossamail, Sylphfeed, Claws, etc...

    Mailbird

  61. Pegasus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still use Pegaus (www.pmail.com) for my personal email on a Virtualboxed Windows 7.

    I just love it. Especially when you can have several emails open at the same time.

    No other email client comes close to Pegasus in terms of productivity.

  62. obv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    D) none of the above

  63. Newton by simoncorry · · Score: 1

    Using Newton, incredibly lightweight for those who donâ(TM)t need all the bells and whistles.

    --
    --- Science & Creativity http://simoncorry.com
  64. PowerMail for Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel so old.

    It was the closest thing to Claris Emailer when Apple arbitrarily cut off that avenue to productivity, as they do.

    Default plain-text email is the only way to go, with the option of viewing HTML if ever required. Fast, stable and not integrated into some conglomerate's data mining conspiracy. It seems to scale to huge mailboxes really well too.

  65. Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has issues, but all the rest are so fucking terrible.

  66. The RAND Message Handler, of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe you nerds have lost the faith! There is only *one* email system: MH.

  67. gMail is close to good by xaosflux · · Score: 1

    I really have gotten used to the gmail interface, despite having my feature request to add an "ORDER BY" keyword command for years. I really don't see why Google refuses to implement this?

  68. ProtonMail.com by shubus · · Score: 1

    Enough said!

    1. Re:ProtonMail.com by Errorbuffoverflow · · Score: 1

      I love Protonmail.

    2. Re:ProtonMail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for the Protonmail Bridge Linux client.

  69. Claws by markdavis · · Score: 2

    Claws Mail. http://www.claws-mail.org/

    I find Claws to be wonderful. It is fast, easy to use, portable, reliable, extremely configurable, and very flexible. Claws has dozens of nice plugins and addons. Rather than being "pretty" and hiding everything from the user, it takes an older-school approach and gives you everything you need, and where you need it. Plus, you are not FORCED to use a mouse- there are key commands for just about everything and you can customize them to death. Has full scripting, filters, and connections for every type of delivery available out there.

    There are a few odd things about it, but of all Email systems and clients I have used, I like it the most. I have hundreds of users using it every day. It is based on Sylpheed, which has been around forever, and development is still going on constantly. Available instantly for every Linux machine and has also been ported to MacOS and MS-Windows.

    As for the problems with encrypted Email and HTML- that is completely due to poorly designed clients that render HTML immediately. Claws allows you to control how Email is displayed. For example, Claws will happily-

    1) Not display the HTML part at all and just show plain-text (the default).
    2) If the Email is in violation of rules and has no plain-text part, it will just invent one out of the HTML body.
    3) If you DO want it to display the HTML (with a plugin), then there are settings to disable any external component loading

    The one thing you can't do with Claws is COMPOSE html Email in it. And you know what? That is just 100% fine and a nice feature :)

    1. Re:Claws by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. Address book is one of its weaker points.

  70. Eudora by JayPee · · Score: 1

    I still miss Eudora.

  71. Stay away from Readdle's Spark for iOS! by koick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although it's a pretty good app for iOS (iphones and ipads), I just recently learned that Spark has some serious security issues. Not only do they collect statistics and analytics on your usage (pretty typical), no much worse, they "use the authorization provided to download your emails to our virtual servers and push to your device". Before I had installed it, wish I'd seen the warnings on many websites against using it.

  72. Eudora by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    The last GOOD mail client was Eudora, until Qualcomm abandoned it. Outlook 2010 is OK, but nothing else has come close. Thunderbird was always glitchy. and I've looked at two or three others that weren't TOO bad. Webmail is OK.

  73. Re:Usable but there needs to be a better alternati by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    Honestly, I feel like the client is a part of the problem, not the solution. Exchange is what makes Outlook really work... but the model is still broken.

    (I use Mac Mail... I really need a fscking calendar that actually works, especially when setting up appointments with Apple corporate.)

    I need zero spam, zero marketing, zero IEEE (et al) announcements. I need messages that are clear on what is "information only" and what requires action on my part; items that I need to monitor, and what I need to have someone else monitor.

    I get about 150 emails per day (after spam/marketing) that require some level of action. It used to be fine while my photographic memory was intact, but now it all just feels like a bunch of garbage.

    I want a client that sorts through all the crap for me and identifies what I need to do...

  74. Elm for Unix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elm for Unix

  75. Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for home Linux desktop, but Gmail web interface for my laptop Linux systems.

  76. gmail's lack of forward-as-attachment is a no-go by diekhans · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why google doesn't get the value of the very basic e-mail functionality of forward-as-attachment.

    Perhaps it should be called `forward-without-corrupting' and the value might be seen.

    This makes it painful to work with someone using gmail even if you don't use it.

    I once worked with someone who need to forward me an HTML-formatted email to understand what hundreds of items that need immediate response were. Gmail insisted on formatting the HTML email (i.e. corrupting) when forwarding.

    I could not make sense of the mail either. There was no way then to get the original email.. All my associate could do to share the email forward.

    It turned out the HTML was invalid and gmail was formatting it in a crazy way. Since this is an AI problem, so I can't fault them for that. However, the lack of them not being able to simply get the email forwared uncorrupted wasted hours.

    Solution was to help associated install an imap client.

    Want to pass mail off to some more appropriate to respond; best way is `forward-as-attachement'.

    Want to help someone with email problems and look at the header; `forward-as-attachement' makes it easy.

    seriously? this is MIME 101

  77. My two favorite clients of all time: Mu4e & GN by deerpig · · Score: 1

    I started started out using Pine, way way back when, then switched to the email client on my NeXT Color Slab. I replaced the NeXT box with an SGI Indy and used their built in email client. But when that died and I moved over to Linux I tried out Emacs Gnus which was fantastic and used that for 10 years. The only drawback to Gnus is search and I finally bit the bullet and moved from Gnus to Emacs Mu4e. It's not as powerful as Gnus, but it has a powerful index engine Mu that runs outside of Emacs and the Emacs client Mu4e is fast, clean and does pretty much everything that I need in a client. My mail is in a Google Apps account under my own domain so I grab email from Google using IMAP using mbsync, and then Mu indexes and syncs. I run this setup on two different machines, one in the office and one at home. Last year I had to split my time between three job sites and used a laptop as well. These tools allow me to integrate email into my entire workflow, I can link to specific emails in document, my task lists and manage issues on our GitLab server that is integrated with code in my git repos, notes and drafts of papers and blog posts (though I have't blogged in a while)

    If I don't have access to any of my boxes running Mu4e I can always slum it and use the Gmail web client, it's not nice, because it isn't a good fit with my tool chain and work flow, but in a pinch it will do if I need to see an email on a mobile phone or someone else's computer.

    I have two screens, the big one runs Emacs with two windows side by side, with Mu4e running in one and elfeed (an Emacs RSS reader) in the other. Any links open in Firefox running in the other monitor.

    Honorable mentions go to Anything which is another Emacs email client and Mutt.

  78. Eudora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way back in the day Eudora was my favorite, then they added ads, then they killed it. I can't remember what was so good about it, but I hated to leave it.

  79. I miss Eudora by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    It worked fine.

    But it’s totally unusable now, with Unicode and whatnot.

    I deal with a guy who still uses Eurora, and his emails are a royal pain in the butt. Plus he often can’t see attachments

  80. I use mailx mostly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use mailx mostly. With the right mailrc commands defined, such as VISUAL which in turn invokes vim with a mailx-only vimrc, and with a couple of function keys also defined, then un-miming is a breeze. No HTML engine ever. Yet can read or save any HTML content.

    Mind you, I had to patch the mailx source to include readline functionality, and fix a few misfeatures and problems. Strange that no Linux distribution appears to have done that.

  81. Outlook Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is even a way to install it on Win7 and later after MS removed it

    https://runasxp.com/Topic-Download-Outlook-Express-for-Windows-7-8-and-10

    In all seriousness, tied to a IMAP server it is one of the leanest quickest clients I've used. And for all my years of using it I have never been infected with malware. The issue isn't outlook express, but all the idiots that will click on every single attachment they are sent. They are just as easily going to get infected in any email client. Outlook just got the bad rap since it is what everyone was using, and everyone likes to blame someone or something else other than their own damn mistakes.

  82. Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thunderbird, imap server, getmail plus server-side filters - basically my own cloud.

  83. NSA or KGB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the Russian Yandex Mail.
    I figure if the NSA are going to be looking at my emails, then I might as well make it easy for the KGB as well.

  84. Thunderbird, maybe some console one by Casandro · · Score: 1

    The main bug in Thunderbird is that it supports HTML-Mail.

    Looking though the linked article, I can say for sure that none of the GUIs in the screenshots would do it for me, as they apparently all support HTML.

    1. Re:Thunderbird, maybe some console one by spth · · Score: 1

      There is an option in the thunderbird "View" menu to always display messages as plain text.

      For those who want some middle ground, there is a "Simple HTML" option beside it that disables active content and remote loading, but otherwise displays HTML.

  85. Eudora - Postbox - ? by jtara · · Score: 1

    I used Eudora for years.

    Then I switched to PostBox.

    Unfortunately, PostBox as of PostBox 6 no longer supports Add-Ons, saying:

    Postbox is built using Mozilla code, and as of Firefox Quantum, add-ons are no longer supported by the Mozilla platform. Consequently, future versions of Postbox will no longer support add-ons, starting with Postbox 6.

    I guess these means Add-Ons go away in Thunderbird, as well?

    I only have two Add-Ons, but I can't live without them:

    - SpamSieve
    - Markdown Here

    Suggestions?

  86. Claws Mail by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    http://www.claws-mail.org/ based on GTK+, distributed under the GPL.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  87. Post Road Mailer. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    It runs under OS/2. It is one step above pine. It does not do html, scripts, etc. Not subject to virii. Is stores notes in extended attributes, which makes it useful for spam tracking.

    It has bugs and tends to go west when dealing with hundreds of e-mails at a time. It is limited to pop3.

  88. claws-mail of course by cats-paw · · Score: 2

    I can't believe I haven't seen it mentioned.

    lightweight, easy-to-use with a very nice set of features.

    I've been using it for quite a while now and I'm really happy with it.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:claws-mail of course by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't say it is so lightweight. But it is better than mutt when it comes to handling several accounts at once.

      I don't like how it works over slow GPRS connections, especialliy with big mailboxes - archives of high volume mailing lists - it cannot do long operations in background, but mutt is no better.

    2. Re:claws-mail of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe not light if you compare to Pine or Mutt, but it's a lot friendlier, and if you compare to Thunderbird it's a real featherweight.

  89. Mixed bag : thunderbird, mbsync, notmuch by bingoUV · · Score: 1

    1. For writing simple mail : thunderbird
    2. For reading recent mail : thunderbird
    3. For writing complex mail : compose in emacs org-mode , export to HTML, and use thunderbird's Stationery add-on to send mail.
    4. For searching old mail - mbsync, notmuch and its emacs client.

    --
    Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  90. My favorites are all gone. by Millennium · · Score: 1

    Claris Emailer on desktop was the first client I ever really liked. PowerMail was a good substitute, but my Mac days are behind me, so I had to leave that behind too.

    Mailbox on mobile was probably my favorite client of all time, though. Probably the only time I was ever really good at e-mail, and then Dropbox went and killed it.

  91. Mail.app and Mutt by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1

    Mail.app for images/attachments and Mutt for everything else.

  92. notmuch (emacs) + OfflineIMAP + homegrown script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The homegrown part is for deleting&refiling stuff. I really like sieve filters but... Well I still have to find a good solution.

  93. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  95. mutt by unwesen · · Score: 2

    No, I'm not kidding.

  96. In Korea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC's are fed to prisoners as long pig

    Tastes like chicken. Gluten-free.

  97. balsa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its fast, sufficiently colorful, and works with standardized mailbox formats (mbox/mdir).

    Unfortunately, in the latest Fedora smtp is not supported with TLS due to some libraries not having been updated appropriately. It feels like balsa is dying. I'm somewhat not surprised it hasn't been mentioned so far. Am I the last one using it?

    1. Re:balsa by technoid_ · · Score: 1

      I tried it recently in the last month or so and found something that stopped me in my tracks. Can't remember exactly what it was, as I tried quite a few email clients in a short time.

      Two of the things that usually got me to stop were:
      Can't change the sort order in the inbox. I want latest at the bottom.
      Can't re-order the row in the mailbox. I want the sender before the subject.

      Until I find something better, I have Thunderbird, mutt, and K-9.

      technoid_

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do - Lew of GO magazine
    2. Re:balsa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two of the things that usually got me to stop were:
      Can't change the sort order in the inbox. I want latest at the bottom.
      Can't re-order the row in the mailbox. I want the sender before the subject.

      Indeed the columns cannot be resorted (I think), but for me it shows "From" before "Subject" as you prefer.
      Changing the order is possible by clicking on the column headings.

  98. Actually there is a solution for IMAP/SMTP by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I've just read, paid-for accounts can use a bridge to decrypt/encrypt protonmail locally and access it via SMTP and/or IMAP.

    1. Re: Actually there is a solution for IMAP/SMTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oxygen AC snarker here.
      Thanks to Chris and jet for the useful bits.

  99. Looks like it is here by Chrisq · · Score: 1
    https://protonmail.com/bridge/install says:

    Download and install the ProtonMail IMAP/SMTP Bridge to use your encrypted email account with any email client. Available for Windows, Mac, and Linux.

  100. Emacs VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cannot possibly imagine how using something that isn't your std editor is a good idea.

  101. RainLoop by snkhere · · Score: 1

    RainLoop works very well as (self-hosted) web-based IMAP client. The mobile client (via browser) works perhaps even better, and installation is very simple.

  102. Use Outlook.com mostly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outlook web mail for myself mostly but occasionally use iCloud for a few things. Don't use Mail app in Windows 10 it has never impressed me. If I used Office 365 I would probably use Outlook but for myself I don't see that is worth paying for just for that. Did buy Outllok.com premium for awhile to get rid of ads. But they don't bother me much anymore so just dropped the premium subscription.

  103. Why do you ask? by kaur · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot community are nerds.
    Aging tech community sticking to our habits and beliefs - "google is evil", "rich e-mail is bad".
    We are outliers as far as email goes.

    Our choices do not matter, as we do not represent the general user in any way.
    Go ask someone else.

  104. Apple mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used Apple Mail app for over 20 years - never had a problem !

  105. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has a bunch of useless features, but it's worked for me.

  106. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all suck balls. I had high hopes for Thunderbird and its commercial fork Postbox, but the huge storage space offered for free/cheap by webmail providers has greatly reduced any interest in desktop clients. And webmail clients suck for different reasons, but it's not like you get a choice, whatever the vendor publishes that's what you use.

  107. Re: Usable but there needs to be a better alternat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good news, bad news situation.

    The good news is there is already a solution to your problem. The better part is that there are millions of them world wide, tens of thousands of which are great and available in just about any major language. And a few dozen, at least in even more obscure languages.

    The one I chose works great. It goes through all my mail, filters out BS HR mail sent to everyone even when it is from a new sender in that group, automatically updates my calendar and even sends me a text message I can reply to for overbooking decisions. It can even batch print signature required forms, and take my paper receipts and processes them into an expense report every two weeks for me.

    The bad news is that it costs more than $99/yr for a good secretary/admin assistant.

    On the plus side, if you hire your own you can even negotiate daycare pick up for a nominal fee or comp time.

    More seriously there are tons of semi/retired seniors capable of doing a great job for a couple hours a day as a PT non greeter job. Protip, let the missus picker her/him. A wizened old battle axe is even cheaper than the cute bunny type, if you factor in the risk of divorce /harassment suits.

  108. Sylpheed + fetchmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer Sylpheed, in which I have set incoming "server" to maildir, with fetchmail as a cronjob downloading the mails.

  109. mutt, of course by Theolojin · · Score: 1

    Mutt. It worked in 1997, and it still works today. Sure, it has more features, but it's the same basic mail client that worked over dial up with a Pentium 100 box with 8 megs of RAM, and now on my 100Mb net connection with my dual-Xeon workstation with 16 gigs of RAM.

    --
    Life is short; think quickly.
  110. Microsoft Entourage by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

    Ok, it was a mess. Bugs, poor performance, but to this day I am still looking for a mail client that will let me create projects the way it did and let me link documents and create folders, route, provide custom calendar views.

    It performed terribly, but I can't find anything to replace it.

  111. PMMail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite client, and I"ve been using it since the OS/2 days is PMMail.

    Hasn't been supported in ages. Doesn't support HTML, text only. It's the perfect client.

  112. nmh - the true *nix email client by belg4mit · · Score: 1
    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  113. I miss Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when an email GUI for linux was just plain voodoo? And once we finally got it running normally, e17 would freak out and you'd have to go hunt down zombie processes.

    Mail was so much more fun back then.

  114. lotus notes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jk

  115. Without a doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Outlook. Microsoft has, hands down, simply the best e-mail client out there. I've used a ton of clients over the years and nothing else comes close.

  116. The Bat! by kyrio · · Score: 1

    The best of the worst. It has its flaws and yet it's still far above all the others: https://www.ritlabs.com/en/pro...

  117. GMail here by supremebob · · Score: 1

    I use GMail, because it's portable between all of my devices. Work laptop, home laptop, home desktop, smartphone... same inbox, no software install needed.

    I'm one of those guys who tries to read every e-mail, and unsubscribes from every marketing list I get myself on. My wife on the other hand, doesn't unsubscribe from anything and probably has 200,000 unread junk e-mails in her inbox by now. Just looking at the screen when she's checking her e-mail drives me batty.

  118. Email clients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife like's "The Bat!" and I like claws-mail.

  119. Thunderbird & AquaMail by sremick · · Score: 1

    On the computer: Thunderbird. I know it's the "cool" thing on Slashdot to bash Thunderbird and Mozilla in general, but truthfully there is no better, full-featured, actively-maintained cross-platform email client.

    On Android, I currently use AquaMail but there are a number of good options there and it's mostly a matter of taste.

  120. Agreed by davebarnes · · Score: 1

    Used in both Windows and Mac OS.
    Even supported the failed efforts to save it.
    Still miss it.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
  121. Gmail with 47,368 unread e-mails by ET3D · · Score: 1

    Sorry, now at 47,369. (I do occasionally trim that, but normally I'm too lazy to do that.)

    I have no idea how many read e-mails the inbox has, but I long gone are the days when I sorted stuff in any way.

  122. meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might aw well ask what is your favorite color?

  123. thunderbird by dimko · · Score: 1

    being using for a while very good compatibility with gmail + good organizer.

  124. Eudora is the client for me. by Rhipf · · Score: 1

    It is getting a bit long in the tooth but I still prefer to use Eudora (version 7.1.0.9 on Windows). I have been using this program forever and like it since it is highly portable if I need to upgrade computers. The program contains itself to one folder and to backup/restore you just need to copy the folder from one computer then paste it to a new computer. Make a shortcut to the exe and you are set to go. No need to install or track down the actual data files.

  125. POP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The POP3 client included with Netscape navigator gold 2.02.

    Oh ok.. not that one?

  126. Importantly: Do you want Google reading your mail? by silvergeek · · Score: 1

    Another important question regarding gmail is: Do you want Google reading your mail? I am slowly migrating to ProtonMail (protonmail.com) because I find Google's reading and archiving my email to be disturbing, perhaps in response to the recent Facebook revelations. Regarding email clients, I am quite happy with Thunderbird because it just makes sense for me and I don't have much use for bells and whistles.

  127. Re: Usable but there needs to be a better alternat by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Well stated and I actually agree with you. The challenge is just in getting people up to speed.

  128. Mailspring (and not nylas n1) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mailspring all the way. Totally performant on linux.

  129. NMH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.nongnu.org/nmh/

  130. Microsoft Outlook Express is the BEST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Outlook Express is the best!
    Not Outlook, that crap will not last another year.
    But Outlook Express? That is a beast.

    It works great for sorting emails and searching them.
    I have like 2 whole years of emails stored!
    Can you believe that? I can search for a email from last year!
    It is amazing at work. (Yea' it does take a BIG chunk of my 4 GB hard drive, but it is worth it)

    It's also fine for reading usenet groups and can combine binary messages.

    It's a great way to find people to talk about my new favorite thing, Adult Swim on cartoon network. NOT FOR KIDS!
    I also download subtitles for anime I import from japan on Video CD, and I download music files for this new thing I got called a 'ipod'.
    It's a MP3 player (that is a compressed audio format).
    It's like a Rio, or walmman, but apple makes it.

    I can't wait until the future... Like 2020 or so..
    We'll have flying cars and be able to 'jack in' like Neo.
    Have you seen the matrix yet?
    It's sooooo cool.

  131. What's wrong... by Brooklynoid · · Score: 1

    ...with Eudora?

  132. Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thunderbird

  133. Imap mail server ? Maildir ? by DrYak · · Score: 1

    A completly different direction for a suggestion, but...

    Have you tough about setting up some server ?
    (On you own home server. I'm sure as a /. geek you have on of those. Just hoping that your basement and your mom's house have a good connection).

    Some Dovecot or Courrier-Imap to hold the her e-mail folders ?
      - Migrating is basically just drag-droping the local folders into the imap server's folder ?
      - In case of Thunderbird going berzerk you can still re-download everything from the Imap server.
      - In case of something that your mom ends up liking more than Thunderbird, it's basically just about pointing that tool to the same home imap server.
      - The above use Maildir, which a lot simpler to backup/restore than mbox. and are lot less corruption sensitive (as they are 1 file per mail, 1 directory per folder. instead of 1 file per folder)

    Drawbacks : whenever network drops between your mom's apartment and the your basement's server, she only get the latest pre-failure snapshot.

    ---

    And on a un-related note, Mozilla are considering making a plug-in based mail storage, which could make using Maildir directly in Thunderbird possible (once all the remaining bugs are closed).
    That would also make her mails better to backup and less corruption prone, and also a tiny bit easier to move across different maildir-based clients.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Imap mail server ? Maildir ? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      No server. I just have one computer. She's got slow internet. She's not nearby so I only visit every few months. I did set her up for IMAP last weekend, she had been on POP3. Thunderbird didn't like just changing the account to IMAP (probably trivial if I had instructions and which json file to tweak). So I created a new account to the same server. After deleting original account this did clean up the several minute hang thunderbird was having on startup.

      Now that I remember that the actual folders are mbox format, I probably could have done a lot of this stuff more quickly. I was both trying to fix the problem with Thunderbird hanging, along with restoring files from backup, and trying to figure out what her passwords were.

  134. Maildir by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Storing mail in its own mbox format is a weakness. Calling it standard mbox is still wrong.

    Eventually, Maildir will be coming to Thunderbird.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  135. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  136. Mutt or Elm or Alpine or TELNET.EXE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mutt is a clear favourite.

    1. Re:Mutt or Elm or Alpine or TELNET.EXE? by eneville · · Score: 1

      mutt is my choice. Use it continually. One of the best days of my life was when I found header caching.

  137. Roundcube. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only use self-hosted webmail because I'm on three different computers in different cities and want unified access to all my accounts and email all the time.

    Roundcube is the only one that has the functionality I want. It does not hide things. It allows me to put newest emails on the bottom. It allows me to add a "To" column to the inbox so I can tell what address it was sent to (I use catchall and a unique address for every entity I deal with.) Folder handling is not stupid (it actually has folders). It doesn't break IMAP folders. The search works very well. It's Free and free and under my control.

    Things it lacks: keyboard shortcuts, per-folder sort settings. That's it.

    https://roundcube.net/

  138. Pegasus: Proprietary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pegasus used to use a proprietary mail folder format. Pissed me off when I switched to Linux. Had to pay a third party for conversion software.

    Pegasus is also proprietary software.

  139. Just AlPine and K-9... why thunderbird? by gosand · · Score: 1

    Just curious, why do you need Thunderbird?
    I use Alpine on the desktop and K-9 on my phone.
    I can use a webmail client for gmail or my hosted domain mail, but don't even remember when I last needed to do that.

    I don't get the point of "inbox zero". I archive by month (e.g. 2017-02 for Feb 2017) Right now I have March, April, and May in my inbox and I have about 300 emails. I can launch alpine and it opens in less than a second. And with fetchmail I can aggregate several emails into one account.
    I have tried other clients, but none of them have come close to being as useful as alpine for me.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  140. I'm not dead yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lotus Notes

  141. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's becoming a bit more persnickety as i don't think its being updated so much but it's what I have always used on all my Linux boxes of various distros.
    I don't use it's local calendaring though, I use the google calendar plugin.

  142. Pine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just easier to use than all that mouse shit.

  143. SBC ? by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Good that you managed to solve the base Thunderbird problem !
    (POP3 ought to be abandoned !)

    No server. I just have one computer. She's got slow internet. She's not nearby so I only visit every few months.

    Then setting up a *local* server ?

    Like a low-power single-board computer (you could go to a Raspberry Pi for the popular solution, though beware of later models requiring good supplies in order to not trigger under-voltage CPU throttling).

    If you go for a slightly more expensive solution (something that has directly SATA port(s), or at least support good transfer speed over USB3) you could also plugin a disk and install a file server for backups (e.g.: her photo collection, her documents).
    (With snapshotting cronjobs on the linux side of things, only accessible over SSH. Samba/CIFS only see the topmost snapshot.
    If mom's laptop ever catches a Ransomware with networking abilities, the virus will only be able to fuck up the latest backup over CIFS, not the older time-line over SSH-only)

    Do not try to save money by picking up an excessively cheap SD boot card.
    Decent UPS solution for SBC boil down usually to a small daughter board with a smartphone's battery management chip and some relatively cheap LiFePo battery plugged to it.

    If you're not much into funny home brewed solutions, you could go for a Synology server box which could let you settup most of the above (mail server, backups).

    Plus the existence of a linux machine within her network that you can SSH into could let you do some minimal remote admin.
    (restrict SSH access to public-keys only, no password allowed. optionally install fail2ban)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  144. Claws Mail, recently converte from KMail by psychonaut · · Score: 1

    I was a long-term user of KMail (since at least 2001) on my home computer. When KMail2 came out, I held off on upgrading because of several showstopping bugs I read about on the KDE Bugzilla. Years and years passed and these bugs didn't get fixed; meanwhile I was stuck using an increasingly antiquated operating system (openSUSE 11.4, from 2012) since all newer versions of it packaged only KMail2. Last year I finally broke down and upgraded the OS to the most recent version.

    Predictably, KMail2 turned out to be a nightmare. Converting my old mail folders was fraught with problems. When I finally got that sorted out, I was bitten by the infamous message duplication bug wherein extra copies of messages would appear whenever the filters were run. None of the workarounds from the dozen or so bug reports worked for me. I had no choice but to switch to another mail client. Though I use Thunderbird at work, its filtering system is underpowered and buggy. Claws Mail seemed to be the only other option.

    In KMail2, as in KMail, my mail was stored in maildir folders, so the easiest migration path to Claws Mail was to set up a local IMAP server -- Dovecot -- and copy over my maildir folders. I then set up an IMAP account in Claws Mail pointing at the local IMAP server.

    I couldn't find any way of easily and accurately migrating my KMail(2) filters, so I manually recreated them all in Claws Mail. It took me a while to get the hang of Claws Mail's filters and actions.

    The only thing that I haven't been able to migrate to my satisfaction is the address book. KMail2 gets the address book from KAddressbook, which uses vCards. But Claws Mail supports neither vCards nor CalDAV servers -- at least not very well. I did manage to export the KAddressbook entries and import them into Claws Mail, but almost all the fields other than the name and e-mail address were lost.

    At this point, I'm waiting either for better vCard/CalDAV support in Claws Mail (in which case I'll consider my migration to Claws Mail complete), or for KMail2 to fix their mail duplication bug, in which case I might switch back to KMail2.

  145. Pine is garbage by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1
    Pine? Seriously?! You need to take a look a Mutt.

    Please tell me Pico is not your favorite editor?

  146. Emacs... by rthille · · Score: 1

    Same as my operating system.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  147. AltaMail by far by m.stewart90 · · Score: 1

    I have been using AltaMail on my iPhone for years. It had a rough beginning but has turned into a vital business tool with many customizable rules, actions and layout options. The latest office hours restrictions for viewing emails and sending time windows makes it more useful for keeping my work out of my head when I am enjoying time with my family https://mobile.eurosmartz.com/...

  148. Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gmail with threads turned off. Works well for me.

  149. Which wood you use? by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    Pine. Okay, fine. AlPine.

    Good luck trying to exploit it with a poisoned SVG file or malicious Javascript.

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
  150. for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    personal (imaps) gnu/linux with feed2imap:
      emacs gnus - debian
      prayer - fastest webmail
      k-9 - android

    work (exchange)
      outlook - desktop windows at work
      evolution - desktop debian at home
      gmail - android

  151. Mailspring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and alpine

  152. exmh by tbuskey · · Score: 1

    My intro to email was on DTSS back in '88.
    Later on I used pine in an xterm before moving to exmh. It was MH with a GUI wrapper written in Tcl/Tk. For both of them I used procmail to redirect my incoming email into folders.

    exmh had lots of feature I miss. Someone wrote an addon I used in '99 that would learn how you moved mail between folders and would start doing it for you. Kinda what gmail's revamp is trying to do 18 years later.

    I even ran a mail server at home and had squirrelmail as a front end. As ISPs started blocking SMTP in and out, I finally got a gmail invite for my home email and haven't looked back.

    At work, it's mostly Outlook/Exchange after the days of Netscape.

  153. Mine is... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird.

  154. Outllook by trevc · · Score: 1

    Still nobody can challenge MS Exchange on the back end with Outlook as the client for productivity.

  155. One that doesnt make use of HTML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTML just adds extra security issues. Thunderbird used to allow the noscript addon but javascript is just another security hole that comes with HTML. Ive noticed that googles webmail interface doesnt seem to allow you to prevent the sending of receipts.

  156. No webmail for me, thanks. by HaDAk · · Score: 0

    Mailbird on Windows.
    Sparrow on Mac. (You can pry it from my cold, dead hands.)
    Gmail on Android.

  157. all Gmail by brinke008 · · Score: 1

    How easy can it be? It's right there on the web, the tablet, the phone, the kindle, and the Chromebook. Set it and forget it. The new GM is better than ever but needs a few tweaks. Re-sizable sidebar, make that horrible dialogue box lower left smaller and then auto dissolve in five seconds, show GHMini reminders in Calendar sidebar.

  158. Thunderbird 38.2/linux by therealbev · · Score: 1

    With a lot of personalization. It just works. No reason to change. I'd like to be able to import my pine mail files from the early 90s into TB, but not enough to actually attempt to do it.

    Blue Mail on Android; I only want to 'sync' when I'm away from my real computer for more than a day (rarely), and I couldn't get K-9 to do that reliably when I tried it several years ago.

  159. Some good ones by spudnic · · Score: 1

    Pegasus or Eudora.

    --
    load "linux",8,1
  160. eM Client by IsoQuantic · · Score: 1

    eM Client lets me set up Gmail as my primary account and basically acts as a shell over Gmail. I can even edit email Subject lines for those nonsensical Subject lines that make no contextual sense.

    --
    -- I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
  161. thunderbird all the way by RealRaven2000 · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird because it supports my Add-ons and all 12 mail accounts + IRC.I like organizing my emails in folders, and my Add-on QuickFolders helps with that.

  162. Evolution by messymerry · · Score: 1

    Bin using Evolution for years,,, now I'm too lazy to change. For the most part I does what I want it to and backups and restorations are a breeze. I will change when I have to... *** OFF TOPIC*** Thank you very much Baby Lock for not making manuals available at your website except for the models you are currently selling. Your forebears are spinning in their graves you twaddling nitwits. Sheesh! How disrespectful can a corporation get???

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
  163. Email Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Windows I haven't found anything better than Eudora, even though Qualcomm quit developing it in 2006. Fantastic search, massive filtering capability, it does have problems with modern certificates (mostly a problem with Gmail as it changes certificates frequently). Adding Stunnel solves that problem. None of the modern clients I've tried match up to it.

  164. Thunderbird, but with plugins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like thunderbird a lot, but PGP was never that friendly there.

    I wonder if someone could make a thunderbrid plugin to do OpsMsg/Drop e2e messaging as an alternative?

  165. Thunderbird on desktop, gmail on smartphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thunderbird on all my LInux desktops. It's main benefit is it's quick and it handles big volumes well.
    Gmail does the trick on the smartphone.

    Guy.

  166. My inbox? by iq145 · · Score: 1

    i have 4929 email, 2137 are unread. i'm at 18% capacity...