Wait, how was it correct? You just said all MP3 players play AACs, and he said that your iTunes are locked in to iPods. I must be missing something here.
Yes, Microsoft should be bashed for its security issues. Absofuckinglutely. You bet. Their widespread security negligence is dangerous and irresponsible. Especially since with each patch more holes are found.
Then there's those theoretical exploits in the Mac OS that Apple has taken care of.
Oh, yes, same thing. Totally. Your logic is FLAWLESS.
Yeah, imagine that. A corporation which touts its security measures while selling the least secure OS on the market gets "sideways remarks!" Heaven forfend! And then you come to their defense like a good little puppy.
1. All us Mac users are homosexual? My girlfriend will be upset when she hears about this.
2. Your research for this lies.. *where*, exactly?
3. If I am a "flaming faggot," and you (bviously) hate "flaming faggots," then why do you browse your way to Mac-related stories on Slashdot and post (anonymously, of course)? Are you "cruising"? Is that it?
And, by the way, BRILLIANT use of ALL CAPS to make your point.
Slashdot Mirror
a set of sleevenotes to read on the toilet
You have an odd set of requirements for recorded music.
Good call. That whole profit thing doesn't guarantee longevity. They should get out of the game now!
It is Apple's best interest to sell music that can only be played on their portable.
Stop it. Answer the question: how do you explain that they sell DRM-free music? These are DRM-free AACs, playable on any music player sold today.
Wait, how was it correct? You just said all MP3 players play AACs, and he said that your iTunes are locked in to iPods. I must be missing something here.
DAMP is the preferred nomenclature (D for Darwin).
I have a box running KLEENIX. Do you?
I think that might qualify as "middle". :-)
Hey, you ought to know. Cock is apparently your specialty. Right?
"Oh, no! He corrected someone's grammar! Whatever shall I do?!"
Yes, Microsoft should be bashed for its security issues. Absofuckinglutely. You bet. Their widespread security negligence is dangerous and irresponsible. Especially since with each patch more holes are found.
Then there's those theoretical exploits in the Mac OS that Apple has taken care of.
Oh, yes, same thing. Totally. Your logic is FLAWLESS.
Yeah, imagine that. A corporation which touts its security measures while selling the least secure OS on the market gets "sideways remarks!" Heaven forfend! And then you come to their defense like a good little puppy.
Poor Microsoft. I'm sure they mean well.
Ah, yes, another troll who cannot tell the difference between THEORY and REALITY.
I bet you grumble at umbrella owners when it rains.
Software Update is a system tool.
Okay, dude, that was unnecessary.
Kidding! Kidding!
Is it just me, or are these Daleks just arrogant pricks?
BAH!
Uh, hello? It's *Slashdot*. That's what we do here. ;-)
That is what really bothers me the most about the Apple and Sony products. The insistance on forcing you to adhere to their proprietary standards.
Huh? You cannot use more than one file format on the iPod?
MP3, AAC, WAV, AIFF... all work fine on the iPod.
Aw, you ruined the movie for me. :-(
Maybe the problem is that they don't want to, and he doesn't like being ignored.
Poor, poor anonymous coward.
1. All us Mac users are homosexual? My girlfriend will be upset when she hears about this.
2. Your research for this lies.. *where*, exactly?
3. If I am a "flaming faggot," and you (bviously) hate "flaming faggots," then why do you browse your way to Mac-related stories on Slashdot and post (anonymously, of course)? Are you "cruising"? Is that it?
And, by the way, BRILLIANT use of ALL CAPS to make your point.
I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM)
Um... you're not serious, asre you? You're using a Mac from 1997 and you're complaining about performance?
Even Safari is straining to keep up as I type this
You're not going to actually try to convince us you're running OS X on that machine, are you? OS X can only be run on USB-equipped Macs.
Obviously a troll. *sigh*
Touche! :-)
And this threatens you ... *how*, exactly?
...what's to stop me from taking my $700, buying a slightly used (if not a brand new one, with student discounts) iBook and playing DVDs on it?
At the very least, i'll have a complete computer, not something crapnasty.
More MS bullycrap.
Apple have 2-4 months to produce a complete iPod package for Windows
Doesn't the iPod already work with Windows? Oh yeah, it does...
Boy, talk about taking it to bizarre ends. How obtuse you are.
Not every device needs to be a Swiss army knife.
Actually, I tend to carry my digital camera with me quite often. But I suppose I'm the exception.