Slashdot Mirror


Tech Predictions for 2004

Quirk writes "The Independent has the predictions of Charles Arthur for 2004. 'The ubiquity of the iPod, the return of the Mac, and the simplicity of the portable memory stick are just some of the developments that could change our lives in 2004.'"

281 comments

  1. My own list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    # Moore's Law will be deemed "obsolete". Despite this, faster computers will still be produced. We will also see x86-64 chips proliferate the market.

    # Linux becomes ready for the desktop (they've predicted this every year).

    # Doom 3 still won't be released.

    # The total destruction of Microsoft's monopoly due to the utter, complete failure of their upcoming retarded product lines. Bill Gates' Ring Of Power tossed into the fires of Mt. Redmond and becomes molten slag. The towers of Microsoft crumble and all rejoice. (Note to Microsoft apologists : If you find this offensive, you need a sense of humour. If you're still unhappy with this, well, you suck.)

    # BSD finally dies. (Note to BSD snobs : See above about Microsoft apologists)

    # KDE and GNOME merge into one project. Supporters from both camps become outraged and civil war breaks out.

    # Linux 2.7 will be forked, ported to run on vending machines and kitchen appliances. 2.6 becomes truly stable, and nobody will care.

    # The RIAA will hand out more lawsuits, some of them for toddlers and livestock.

    # Darl McBride follows the RIAA's footsteps, and starts suing toddlers and livestock too for unauthorized use of SCO intellectual property.

    # Martians recover Beagle 2, reprogram it and send it back to to conquer Earth.

    1. Re:My own list by grubi · · Score: 1

      Wait... no Doom 3?

      Dammit. ;-)

      --
      Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
    2. Re:My own list by questamor · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Amiga is coming back too. don't forget the Amiga.

    3. Re:My own list by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      The only Ring of Power that I see are the rights of any claim of ownership of UNIX. Whoever controls those without destroying them will be subject to the corrupting influence of trying to make claims of ownership of anything close to UNIX like the elven rings of Linux.

      Just look at what happened to Gollum McBride. Sad.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:My own list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # Doom 3 still won't be released.
      I think you mean Duke Nukem Forever still won't be released.

    5. Re:My own list by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      # Doom 3 still won't be released.

      I think it almost certainly will but no one should get upset if it isn't, ID (and carmack in particular) have always said the release date is "when it's done".

      Now Half-Life 2 on the other hand is a different story, anyone care to place any bets ?.

    6. Re:My own list by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Doom 3 still won't be released.

      You sure you didn't mean Duke Nukem Forever?

    7. Re:My own list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it is and its already happening. The first beta versions of the new amigaos will be seeded to users in the first part of the year, and it looks STUNNING. It's right around the corner

    8. Re:My own list by Dylan_t_p · · Score: 1

      in 2054 someone will find the incomplete code in a buried office building and create an updated version of it for the Playstation VR

    9. Re:My own list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Properity is just around the corner!"

      Did he say corner or coroner?

    10. Re:My own list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any time now.

    11. Re:My own list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Any time. Real soon now(tm). Honest. New AmigaOS. Really! I mean it!(tm)

    12. Re:My own list by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      # The total destruction of Microsoft's monopoly due to the utter, complete failure of their upcoming retarded product lines. Bill Gates' Ring Of Power tossed into the fires of Mt. Redmond and becomes molten slag. The towers of Microsoft crumble and all rejoice. (Note to Microsoft apologists : If you find this offensive, you need a sense of humour. If you're still unhappy with this, well, you suck.)


      You fool, Bill Gates' Ring of Power must be thrown into the fires of Mt. Raineir. We haven't destroyed the ring because we're waiting for an erruption. Once that happens - kiss his but goodbye.

    13. Re:My own list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the new AmigaOS 4 does look quite stunning - hats off to Hyperion (the development company contracted by Amiga Inc to redevelop the OS) for all the hard work they have put into building a modern and relevant environment.

      Sadly, I regretfully predict that AmigaOS will not make it long term, my reasons:

      * The AmigaOne hardware platform is not mainstream and terribly expensive. This is unlikely to get better since the PPC CPU's will never be as competitively priced as x86 and the cost of motherboard manufacture will continue to be high due to the low production numbers
      * AmigaOS 4.0 is too little too late. As I said above, kudos to Hyperion for putting it together but Windows and Linux have too large of a bite of the market that it will be difficult to attract new users to the Amiga fold.
      * As Dave Haynie (one of the original Commodore Enginners) said in a recent interview, the Amiga One does not have anything unique or distinctive about it. Without a key differentiator, it will struggle to attract attention - even to the old Amigians
      * Application development will be slow and inconsistant. Even though there will be a good repository of applications, we will not see another 'SCALA' that will blow users away

      I don't mean to condemn the Amiga just as it is about to rise above the painful ashes, however the best users can hope for is a small group of hardcore ex-Amiga users who will attempt to keep the dream alive.

      Good Luck Amiga Inc, I wish you all the very best!

  2. Word confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    I keep confusing ubiquitous with obsequious. They don't sound that much alike, and mean different things, but most of the time you can replace one with the other.

    Which one was the iPod again?

  3. Don't buy Windows? by Chazmati · · Score: 2

    I don't agree with everything he says, but I like this prediction:

    * If you're buying a computer in the coming year, don't get one that uses Windows. It's simply too insecure. (Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.) Get one with the Linux operating system installed (Evesham does them, for example) or an Apple machine running OSX. Both systems are fast, stable and secure. With Windows XP... well, sometimes two out of three really IS bad.

    1. Re:Don't buy Windows? by gangibson · · Score: 1

      Nice, but a real stretch of the definition of "prediction."

    2. Re:Don't buy Windows? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was what he wanted people to do for 2004

    3. Re:Don't buy Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft apologists will give a knee-jerk rant in response to the above in 3, 2, 1...

    4. Re:Don't buy Windows? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but who cares?

      Anytime anyone says linux/mozilla are better than windows/ie, a few more people take it seriously. Take any opportunity you can.

      Personally, I'm stuck on Windows because of MS work I get in .NET and VB, but I'd like to switch.

    5. Re:Don't buy Windows? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Well, while I agree that nobody should buy a Windows machine these days for security reasons, I just think his example of the hidden administrator account is stupid. Hey, I'm using Mac OS X and it has a "secret administration account", which is called root. Yeah, it's disabled from the beginning, but doing "sudo passwd root" and you have activated it.

      Not having any experience with XP machines: I hope the default password for the Administrator account on XP isn't an empty string. IIRC it was on Win2000, but I never had the problem because I always config my machines multi-user (and Admin gets a real password)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:Don't buy Windows? by newsdee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      don't get one that uses Windows (...) did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine?
      This is kind of misleading actually. AFAIK anybody skilled enough to manually configure Linux is able to find out this on Windows and change the default password. There were some "hidden" accounts in Linux too, but I suppose that new distros now come with a huge "warning: change such and such password now", so maybe even a complete newbie is safer with Linux indeed.

    7. Re:Don't buy Windows? by Lispy · · Score: 0

      Yeah. That quote was a bit lame indeed. the problem is that he sounds that bit too much like a Mac zealot to me. His "predictions" are rather commonsense. But I guess that's because we are all /.ers.

    8. Re:Don't buy Windows? by herulach · · Score: 1

      I belive the default password is password, but ive never used it. Any XP machine ive used has always had it changed immeadiatly with net.

    9. Re:Don't buy Windows? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      There were some "hidden" accounts in Linux too, ...

      You mean like nobody, cdrom, ppp, etc.? Some of them come without logon capability. You can easily define a logon shell, but they don't have one, so they can't log on. What they generally seem to be for is to allow file sharing without needing to re-logon. The others... well, they don't have administration capabilities, except over the programs that they are installed for. Some of them also don't have home directories, so they can only read/write in public areas (e.g., /tmp). Others, well, sometimes I admit I'm not sure, but I ask myself "How would someone get access to the account?", and myself says "It would only happen if you've already been rooted". I suppose that myself might be wrong, but, e.g., I don't HAVE any publically accessible web pages, so there wouldn't be much gain in penetrating nobody (or is it http?)

      Actually, having things in separate accounts is a way of limiting the damage of any penetration...but I sometimes wonder why there exists a logon shell for an account. I suppose that I could set it to /bin/false, but I don't know what I might break, and I don't know how to find it out. (Time delays make a simple "change it and see" approach impractical.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:Don't buy Windows? by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      IIRC the default password has to be set during the install of XP. If you leave it blank your default account becomes Administrator, if you choose a password you are given the chance to add other default accounts for youself and others. All of which have blank passwords and all are administrators too. Which ain't that great. :) Supposedly Service Pack 2 will fix a lot of these things, but time will tell.

      As much as I encourage and want to see the adoption of Linux on the desktop I do worry that people will not like using Linux because they lose the comfort factor of Windows. This is the biggest problem facing Linux IMHO, people who are used to Windows just don't want to learn a new operating system.

      I also worry about what happens if a security flaw is found in a Linux "desktop distro", how will these flaws get fixed? There's probably going to have to be some sort of "Windows Update" for Linux. I still see default Windows 98 systems with unpatched versions of Outlook Express that will allow a system to be infected as soon as an email is viewed in the preview pane, Linux has a protected memory model and is generally better written but even so, how will Linux distro companies deliver patches if MS currently can't get unskilled users to update? And any security flaws found will be trumpeted from the top of Mt. Redmond to anyone who will listen.

    11. Re:Don't buy Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Reply to the author

      I certainly hope this artical was aimed at the Geek mark, but then why say it?
      Have you ever used Linux? much as I like it I havent found a distro I'd even concider putting on a Joe Bloggs PC its just too complicated, and the MacOS GUI is horrible, MacOS is just too User Inefficent, Im betting its due to the stubborn Mr Jobs but I serosly cant see why anyone would choose it over KDE or even the Windows GUI! (Im currently looking for a way to use KDE on Darwin, best of both worlds)

      As for the "Administrator" comment, did you know theres a secret "root" account and password on every Mac? (every hacker does), so whats your point? you cant just do that, I demand you edit your artical to say this because your making out XP has insecuritys that MacOS dosnt, heck why pick this one it wasnt like you where short on choice!

    12. Re:Don't buy Windows? by molafson · · Score: 1

      There were some "hidden" accounts in Linux too, ...
      You mean like nobody, cdrom, ppp, etc.?


      IIRC, in Slackware releases 3.2 and earlier, three users (satan, gonzo, and snake) were automatically configured without passwords.

    13. Re:Don't buy Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho hum. I *am* the author (can't be bothered to create the account). Yes, I've used Linux - did a big series earlier in the year about what the desktop experience is like for the new user.

      I *advised* people to buy a machine with either Linux or Mac because WinXP has these big security holes. As in, an *enabled* admin account with default password that the normal user doesn't know about, and so doesn't close. Mac OSX has a root account, but it is not enabled by default. With Linux, yes I know (because I've used it), you get told to create the root account, and then a user account.

      As for your final point - noticed how much spam comes from compromised broadband-connected PCs these days? Ever seen a single one that comes from a compromised Linux or Mac OS (either one) box? So no, I'm not going to edit the article.

      Charles

    14. Re:Don't buy Windows? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      And System V had a default guest account. But it couldn't do much, so it was basically harmless (barring some hideous exploit).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    15. Re:Don't buy Windows? by herulach · · Score: 1

      Windows still creates the Administrator account if you set a user up during the install. You can only see it in safe mode, or by using 'net user' at a prompt. On my box there are 3 other accounts i had nothing to do with, Guest, which is turned off, HelpAssistant, and support something or other. Now guest i dont mind, but if help assistant is the account for using the remote desktop control thingy then i want to get rid of it.

      As for making all accounts created during install admins, that kind of makes sense, since non admin accounts on XP are the most useless things ever (cant install most software, only write to your own home directory) At least if you have your file system set to NTFS anyway.

  4. Re:I predict... by grubi · · Score: 1

    I cannot figure out if this prediction gets funnier or stupider each time I read it.

    Anyone else got it figured out?

    --
    Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
  5. Anyone find it strange? by cubicledrone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Practically the entirety of business now relies on computers for just about everything, yet few, if any, can find careers working with computers?

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:Anyone find it strange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Practically the entirety of business now relies on Post-Its for just about everything, yet few, if any, can find careers working with Post-Its?

    2. Re:Anyone find it strange? by pigpilot · · Score: 5, Informative

      If by "careers working with computers" you mean doing more than just using them, i.e. writing software etc then I'm not surprised. Every major business that I can think of relies more on telephones and plumbing but relatively few people need to make a career out of them.

      For most of us computers are just a tool that help us get on with our job, and like most tools they are rarely a career in themselves.

    3. Re:Anyone find it strange? by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      A computer that works does not need anyone to work with it.

      In fact in 3 years I've never had to work with my iMac. I just hit the update button when it asks me to and put in a new OS CD every once in a while, it does the rest.

      Now my windows box (and mom and dads) on the other hand, need a IT staff of 20 to keep running.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    4. Re:Anyone find it strange? by XorNand · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded as interesting? It's a gross exaggeration. Hey man, I was unemployed for 7 months before I landed my current gig a month ago. Yeah, it sucks. However, you should consider making your New Year's Resolution to be less bitter and more optimistic. It's like dating or sales... it's all a numbers game; just keep plugging away at it. You *will* eventually hit gold. Another bit of advice: if you cannot grow vertically (getting a job, promotion, etc.), grow horizontially: Learn new stuff to make you more valuable and to keep yourself busy. I myself went back to school a year ago to get a BA. I'm almost halfway done already (taking a heavy load intentionally)! It kept me focused and made me feel like I could control my destiny a bit, instead of praying for a call from the next recruiter. 2004 is going to be a huge rebound year for tech spending, I can pratically promise that. The light it there, just don't get burnout before you reach it.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    5. Re:Anyone find it strange? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      like dating or sales... it's all a numbers game; just keep plugging away at it. You *will* eventually hit gold

      Tell that to Johnny Bravo.

      --
      No sig
    6. Re:Anyone find it strange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of secretaries?

      Nice troll.

    7. Re:Anyone find it strange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ever heard of secretaries?

      Hmm, nope. Not for many years. Assistants, coordinators and scores or other titles, but I haven't heard secretary for a long long time.

    8. Re:Anyone find it strange? by cubicledrone · · Score: 0

      For most of us computers are just a tool that help us get on with our job, and like most tools they are rarely a career in themselves.

      Like automobiles? How many people are directly employed to maintain, sell, design, manufacture and repair automobiles and parts for automobiles? 10 million? 20?

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    9. Re:Anyone find it strange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of secretaries?

      Yes. They work with post its and with computers. There are a lot of jobs working with computers. Jobs where computers are the objective rather than just a tool to get the job done are unusual but that's because computers are just tools to get jobs done. Like post its.

    10. Re:Anyone find it strange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      How many people are directly employed to maintain, sell, design, manufacture and repair automobiles and parts for automobiles? 10 million? 20?

      I don't know. If you find out and also find out how many people are employed to maintain, sell, design, manufacture and repair computers and parts for computers then we can compare the numbers and maybe it'll even be interesting. Or maybe not. Until then though, it's hard to tell what your point is supposed to be.

    11. Re:Anyone find it strange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's like dating or sales... it's all a numbers game; just keep plugging away at it. You *will* eventually hit gold. Another bit of advice: if you cannot grow vertically (getting a job, promotion, etc.), grow horizontially

      Oh... I thought it was growing so much horizontally that had ruined my dating chances.

    12. Re:Anyone find it strange? by cubicledrone · · Score: 0

      The point is rather obvious. There are 130 million PCs and no careers.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    13. Re:Anyone find it strange? by davecb · · Score: 1
      For most of us computers are just a tool that help us get on with our job

      The computer is a lot like the electric motor of my childhood: you bought stand-alone ones and hooked them to your tools with v-belts, and inventors in garages came up with ways to put them in individual appliances, such as the washing machine. Later people even instaled them as starters in automobiles.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    14. Re:Anyone find it strange? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Practically the entirety of business now relies on Post-Its for just about everything, yet few, if any, can find careers working with Post-Its?

      Every professional business plan includes an entry pertaining to post-it notes.

    15. Re:Anyone find it strange? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Now my windows box (and mom and dads) on the other hand, need a IT staff of 20 to keep running.

      Then you don't know how to use windows, nor do 19 of those people. If you're going to be honest on one side, be honest on the other too. OSX may be better than Windows (dunno, never used it, I'm guessing it is) but don't make ridiculous comments like that.

    16. Re:Anyone find it strange? by OverclockedMind · · Score: 0

      you suck macintosh fucker, rot in hell and dont give me a neg number for bashing fuckintosh

      --
      if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
  6. It's that easy? by rinkjustice · · Score: 4, Funny

    The ubiquity of the iPod, the return of the Mac, and the simplicity of the portable memory stick are just some of the developments that could change our lives in 2004.

    So, if I buy these Apple products and flash memory, my life will change and this gaping chasm which plagues my existance will be gone forever?

    To hell with new years resolutions! Where's my credit card!

    1. Re:It's that easy? by Whafro · · Score: 1

      It didn't say it would change your life for the better...

      1. You'll lose all your friends because you are always too antisocial with your earbuds on listening to your iPod.

      2. Your boss will realize that you have a Mac at home think that you're not dedicated to the new development goals, all of which are based on Windows.

      3. You'll lose the memory stick that has your most important data on it, and your boss will finally fire you, you Mac-loving luch.

      Then again, maybe you have no friends to begin with and haven't yet found a job... in which case, maybe things can go up from here.

    2. Re:It's that easy? by shplorb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, if I buy these Apple products and flash memory, my life will change and this gaping chasm which plagues my existance will be gone forever?

      To look at or touch Apple products is to experience the ultimate consumer orgasm - some sort of weird love-like feeling, where you can't help but feel good about forking over a wad of cash for the product that you've survived for years without, but now that you've held it you know that you can't live without it.

      Or maybe it's more like crack... they give you a freebie (test drive in the store) and then you'll do anything to get your hands on one.

      All I know is that I'm saving up for a dual G5 and iPod to complement my iBook =]

    3. Re:It's that easy? by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      For most of my life I never though I would use a mac, but with the comming of OS X, I learned that was not true, I now have (and love) my G4 iBook, and the integration with the iPod and my cell phone is well words just can not state it.

    4. Re:It's that easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To look at or touch Apple products is to experience the ultimate consumer orgasm - some sort of weird love-like feeling, where you can't help but feel good about forking over a wad of cash for the product that you've survived for years without, but now that you've held it you know that you can't live without it.

      I would have to agree with this comment! As an non-Apple user (ex-Amigian and WindBlows developer/user for the past 8 years), my observation is that Apple certainly seem to the the sex appeal that other platform/vedors simply don't.

      I went into an AppleCenter the other day for the first time in my life and was seriously blown away with the quality, thought and sense of unity Apple products have with their users.

      I can see why Apple users fiercely resist the Bill Gates vaccum and stay loyal to their brand. I remember this feeling when I had my Amiga :(

      Keep the innovation going Apple, we need computer companies like you!

  7. Here's One by cubicledrone · · Score: 0, Troll

    Some programmers might actually stop wasting time reinstalling and reconfiguring crashware, buy a Mac and get some fucking work done for a change.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:Here's One by RealBeanDip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>reinstalling and reconfiguring crashware

      What if that's your job?

      If Windows actually worked as advertised, A LOT [more] of us would be out of work.

      This is sad, but true.

      --

      You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

    2. Re:Here's One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, think how much better we'd be if every device was so unreliable. Okay, everybody would be wasting their time fixing stuff instead of actually doing anything useful, but think how much better off we'd all be!

      A much better solution is if we had a working version of Windows and instead of being "out of work" you could dig holes one day and fill them in the next. You'd have the satisfaction of having a job and everyone else would be more productive.

  8. Apple's successes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I think Apple's once-in-4-year impressive streak has just gone by. Look at the past. The original PPC got everyone talking about Apple, but nothing special came of it as it languished. that's 1994. Then the iMac and G3 really brought them back to the brink of success and... they languished. That was 1998. Now 2003 they've done the G5 thing and impressed everyone. It's a 4 year cycle, and you can bet your boots they're going to sit back on their lorrals & ride the success this last year has brought, and creep ahead in tiny amounts until 2008 or so.

    It's not a bad strategy I guess, one year's intensive effort for 4 years worth of the company surviving, but they've been really pushing the line lately, and with the economy how it is I don't see Apple surviving past 2005

    1. Re:Apple's successes? by BobWeiner · · Score: 1
      I'd love to take you up on your bet.

      It's not a bad strategy I guess, one year's intensive effort for 4 years worth of the company surviving, but they've been really pushing the line lately, and with the economy how it is I don't see Apple surviving past 2005
      --
      The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
    2. Re:Apple's successes? by ITR81 · · Score: 1

      iPod sales have increased 140% over last yr and are anticipated to increase even more this yr. Powerbook sales have increased by 40% and PowerMac sales have improved by 30%. Mac sales are rising and won't be slowing down anytime soon with new G5 lineups coming this yr which includes hitting 3GHz and beyond and Xserve servers and Powerbooks. In about 5 days we will see the cheap iPod introduce which will just mean more sales for Apple and almost complete dominance in this sector of the market.

    3. Re:Apple's successes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because Apple does not support commodity software or commodity computing, its long term chances for survival are almost nil. There is no way you are going to sell many Apple computers in China, for example. With China poised to become the world's leading economy within 10 or 15 years, Apple will have shot its wad.

      Apple's clientele is primarily composed of wealthy Americans. Although some Apple computers do find their way into business and industry, 99% serve as toys and decorative items of the rich. Borrowing some vocabulary from Howard Dean's book, isn't it ludicrous for some wealthy "metrosexual" to be listening on his iPod to black delta bluesmen moaning out their hard luck stories? I suppose listening to "the blues" on an iPod it is some sort of compensation for the guilt they feel.

      "I've got the iPod blues. My life is so hard. My batteries only last 9 hours ... I've got the blues ..."

    4. Re:Apple's successes? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They've been a bit down and not that special for a while in the past, but they've come back up I reckon they're gonna keep going up now. For the first time since Win 95 the world at large is just beginning to look at alternatives. OSS has it's inherent problems in the eyes of the companies who may use it (both founded and unfounded worries). Apple has released OSX in a few incarnations, all of which are pretty damn nice, filling the gap nicely when companies want to update their infrastructure.

      When high capacity MP3 players are bulky and ugly they come out with iPod series 1. After the hype goes away they swoop in again with more capacity and Windows compatability. Finally they tie it in with the ITMS placating the music industry while locking people into paying them for music rather than any other download service. They don't even get hate mail for this lock in because, quite frankly, their product is good enough that people don't really want to bother with the inferior alternatives. How many people have you heard grumbling that they can't move from ITMS to Napster 2?

      When 64 Bit is coming to be not only the next big thing but also buzzword of the day, the G5 comes out and holds its own because, once again, its a damn good product.

      Next year the iPod moves into the low end arena and stands to smash the competition if it's priced right and done well (which it probably will be).

    5. Re:Apple's successes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't support what comodity software?

      Likewise, aside from otherboards, what comodity parts don't they support?

      And isn't apple the #1 oe #2 cmputer manufacturer in Japan?

  9. Better predictions by sane? · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think he's indulged a bit too much over Christmas. Here's some better predictions:
    • ipod and mini ipod will be hit by a wave of cheap replacements that both allow you to store/play music AND video. These will integrate with mobile phones (2G).
    • Multi processor machines will begin to take off in the business environment. Single user, multi machine setups will smooth the rollout of Linux/OpenOffice and make people more productive
    • Appliances that take advantage of home broadband links and WiFi will take off.
    • Microsoft will get scared, and will run towards early launch of XBox 2 as a home machine. Failure will spell the fall of Microsoft.
    • The Apple House will be unveiled
    1. Re:Better predictions by grubi · · Score: 1

      I think you've got too much optimism (is it optimism? I think so) in your predictions, but, then again, I'm a failed expert. :-)

      --
      Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
    2. Re:Better predictions by Performaman · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft will get scared, and will run towards early launch of XBox2 as a home machine. Failure will spell the fall of Microsoft." I aggree with that. MS will feel threatened by the failure of the SCO suit against IBM, the success of iTunes music store and iPod, and the PSX's success that they will: -Develop "Windows Media Player Music Store" -Release XBox2 early, but not as complete as it would have been -Create a WindowsCE based harddrive music player -Release Longhorn early These will all fail miserably and discredit Microsoft. Also, I think that we will start to see people buying XBoxes, upgrading them with bigger harddrives, installing Linux and using them as cheap servers, which will further hurt Microsoft, since they loose money on every XBox they sell. And that's what I see on the Redmond front.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    3. Re:Better predictions by WolF-g · · Score: 0

      The Apple House will be unveiled

      That's Apple iHouse to you.....

  10. ugh by grubi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Picture phones will become pervasive; it'll be unusual not to have one.

    Dear God, no: I think it's dumb to have one device that does two things badly rather than own two devices that do each thing moderately well.

    But, then again, I'm a dreamer, eh?

    --
    Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
    1. Re:ugh by znu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's one thing a picture phone does very well: it lets you take a picture and immediately send it to someone, from anywhere. Right now, to do that with two separate devices, you need a laptop to mediate between them. Hopefully digital camera makers will eventually hit on the idea of adding Bluetooth to their cameras, so they can send pictures directly to phones.

      Until then, I'll hang on to my Nokia 3650.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    2. Re:ugh by grubi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, use logic and facts to decimate my argument. ;-)

      --
      Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
    3. Re:ugh by emil.ede · · Score: 1

      No your missunderstanding the use of picture phones. It's not meant to replace regular digital cameras, if anything it's a development of SMS. You can send a picture of something that happens to you, it's cool! (but still I can't imagine how pissed I would be if I took a really neat picture with the camera phone, and than of course not be able to use it on the web/print it out/as a desktop pattern/whatever because the quality sucks).

    4. Re:ugh by Otter · · Score: 1
      Dear God, no: I think it's dumb to have one device that does two things badly rather than own two devices that do each thing moderately well.

      I thought camera phones were the stupidest thing ever, and those commercials with Catherine Zeta-Jones didn't convince me otherwise. In fact, I now see people using them all the time.

      There's a simple reason. Do you normally carry a camera around with you? Professional photographers aside, no one else does. Adding a camera to a device you'd carry anyway means that when you see a BSOD on an ATM or a family of ducks walking down the street, you can take a picture instead of not taking one with the much superior camera you left at home.

    5. Re:ugh by Hodge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course picture phones are not meant to replace cameras! They're designed to fill up all the available bandwidth so that (a) the telecoms get lot's of dosh, (b) the networks need replacement with 4G and the networks get locks of dosh and, (c) we get our pockets sucked dry paying for it all! Hodgodamus' prediction for 2004 is that applications will be developed to allow access to online music stores via mobile phones. This will be lead by the telecoms as a great benefit to consumer choice when really (a), (b) and (c) are the real winners.

    6. Re:ugh by grubi · · Score: 1

      Actually, I tend to carry my digital camera with me quite often. But I suppose I'm the exception.

      --
      Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
    7. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. I've been able to convince a lot of girls to take pictures of themselves sans clothing with their picture phones. Something about the ease of taking the photo and no trip to the photo lab leads them to think less about what they're doing. And if they're drunk, it's even easier. Yay, picture phones!

    8. Re:ugh by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Funny
      They're already ridiculously popular in the UK. Remember that in Europe, the land of GSM, mobile phones are pretty much given away with breakfast cereal. Everyone I know wants a cameraphone for their next phone.

      Of course the real purpose of a cameraphone is to get too drunk to know what you're doing but not too drunk to do it and send pictures of your tits to vague acquaintances, leading to tremendous embarrassment in the morning.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    9. Re:ugh by smartalix · · Score: 1

      Or you can own a decent PDA/phone like the Treo 600. The camera in it sucks, but I use my Pentax Optio S to take a picture, put the SD memory card in the Treo, and use SnapperMail to send the image (hi-res) to where I want it to go, no compromises in quality or convenience (yes, I do carry the Optio S in an Altoids can.)

      --
      Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  11. Don't bother reading the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically his predictions boil down to:

    Anything Apple does is great. Anything Microsoft does is bad.

    1. Re:Don't bother reading the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's he going to say in 18 months when the batteries die?

    2. Re:Don't bother reading the article. by ITR81 · · Score: 1

      He's going to say battery still not dead yet. I have iPod 24 months old now and it still holds around 80% of it's charge still.

    3. Re:Don't bother reading the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then, we just have the word of one of the iPod-people

    4. Re:Don't bother reading the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ipod has lasted as long... make that two ipod people.

  12. Bah by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Irrelevant ramblings, false prophesies and old wife's tales. I don't trust ANY prediction unless said prediction is backed up by a) cold hard facts or b) senior, decision-making employee who can actually influence the fate of his/her own prediction. For the rest, all predictions are worthless. In fact, let's have a completely random top ten predictions from Seth for 2004!

    1. This year I will manage to get in bed with that cute girl studying photography.
    2. The US will start another war on $random_country for support of $random_terrorist_group.
    3. Alan Ralsky will confess his sins and become a Red-Cross medic in Eritrea.
    4. This list is absolute bullshit.
    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, number 1 certainly is.

  13. Sane Advice by smoking2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading the no so well thought about Forbes advice, this guy has some great advice for Joe User. I've been saying this for a coule of years now, but maybe now they'll finally "get it":
    * If you're buying a computer in the coming year, don't get one that uses Windows. It's simply too insecure. (Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.) Get one with the Linux operating system installed (Evesham does them, for example) or an Apple machine running OSX. Both systems are fast, stable and secure. With Windows XP... well, sometimes two out of three really IS bad.
    [...]
    * If you're still using Windows, stop using Internet Explorer; instead try Netscape, Mozilla or Opera. IE has too many security holes for comfort.

    * Ditto Outlook Express; try programs such as Eudora or Opera or Mozilla.

    Or will these comments never reach the uninformed users?

    1. Re:Sane Advice by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I know about the regular one, but what's the secret "administrator" account? I'm kinda curious.
      Being a MCSE and all, shouldn't they have told me when I got the implant & swore the blood oath?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:Sane Advice by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Well, the Independent is a pretty major broadsheet newspaper in the UK and well respected, and I imagine read by a younger more technically interested audience than say The Daily Telegraph.

      So, someone prints something like "Get Linux" in there, and more people take Linux seriously.

    3. Re:Sane Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know either but, I was board and tried to diable my default administrator account and no matter what I tried I was unable to disable it.

      Now this might be a safty feature for windows admins
      but I don't like it.

  14. Almost three in a row by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    • There will be more viruses and worms that silently exploit holes in Microsoft Windows ... These are the offspring of virus writers hired by organised crime.
    • There will also be more "phishing" scams ... These too are from computer experts working for organised crime.
    • Legal music downloading stores will arrive properly ...

    Draw your own conclusions about the RIAA :-)
  15. Boom in Computer-linked home security devices by Cryofan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There will likely continue to be an increase in crime due to several factors, such as increasing poverty because of neoliberal economic policies, and also due to importation of poverty from 3rd world, which also lowers wages.

    I predict that this increasing poverty will cause a boom in home and auto security devices which are linked to personal computers in order to provide more sophisticated theft deterrents. For example, motion detectors which transmit detected motion signals to a personal computer via serial port or USB interface via either wireless transmission or signal wires.

    The motion detected signals will be detected by software that will be able to be configured by an unsophisticated user to take actions that will scare off burglars. For example, play useful sound files output to speakers outside. The sound files might be randomly selected files that sound like a security officer talking to a dispatched about an intruder.

    Also the computer could communicate with relays and stepper motors via via serial port or USB interface to turn on and move in a random, jerky manner an outside floodlight.

    There are some products currently out now that can provide these deterrents, but they typically too expensive, unreliable, or too hard to use right now.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Boom in Computer-linked home security devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I followed the link in your sig, and Jesus Christ, Kucinich?!? Give me a fucking break. Kucinich reminds me of this rat I saw in the subway last weekend, and the rat was dead, long dead. It was twitching, yes, but only because it was busy being eaten by another rat. I almost vomited when I saw that, and Kucinich, likewise, makes me want to puke every time I see his shriveled head, and if I didn't manage to gag back my puke, I'd be sure to puke on one of his supporters, such as you; God knows they all need a shower anyway, though then again, what's a little vomit to someone who hasn't bathed or cut his hair since the sprightly age of ten, when Nader embarrassed the Greens with 2% of the popular vote? Grow the fuck up and throw your meager weight behind someone who can actually win, like John Kerry.

    2. Re:Boom in Computer-linked home security devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoting
      "I predict that this increasing poverty will cause a boom in home and auto security devices which are linked to personal computers in order to provide more sophisticated theft deterrents. For example, motion detectors which transmit detected motion signals to a personal computer via serial port or USB interface via either wireless transmission or signal wires."

      Then we just have to wait for a new chapter in the Anachist's cookbook entitled "Building your own EM Pulse weapon" :)

    3. Re:Boom in Computer-linked home security devices by mabu · · Score: 1

      There will likely continue to be an increase in crime due to several factors, such as increasing poverty because of neoliberal economic policies, and also due to importation of poverty from 3rd world, which also lowers wages.

      Judgeting from your diatribe, it appears the importation of 3rd world, mind altering substances is also on the rise.

    4. Re:Boom in Computer-linked home security devices by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

      This is silly if not plain stupid. So the signal is transmitted to the computed and what happens next? Is it transmitted to your work computer? Well, most people don't have time to watch it as they are busy with their work. Some load noise is made by appopriate softawre? And in ideal wordl thief runs away as ast as he could. But criminal are clever too. So the answer is ... use firms that provide security services. They are professional and efficient. Well, yes. Something could be done about car alarms as these are screaming on the streets. Like if, we could have a net (poeple agaings car thiefs, kind of home watch), if car alarms decides the car is been attacke it rings mole phones in the near vicinity. Human being has best ability to decide is it crimiminal or just a cat on you car. And then he\she coiluld call police.

    5. Re:Boom in Computer-linked home security devices by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

      stupid errors :)

  16. more FUD? by grubi · · Score: 2, Informative

    * At least one other download store will join Apple in using the Dolby "AAC" encoding format, because that's the only way to reach iPod owners.

    Um, hello? What? MP3 works perfectly well on iPods. Always has. Why is AAC the "only way" to reach iPod users?

    --
    Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
    1. Re:more FUD? by znu · · Score: 1

      MP3 doesn't provide any sort of DRM, and there's a lot of music which online stores are never going to be allowed to license for distribution without DRM.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    2. Re:more FUD? by grubi · · Score: 1

      Dammit -- stop arguing against my rants with logic. You're ruining my self-esteem.

      --
      Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
  17. Apple will sell several million cheap iPods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and send RIAA after anyone that doesn't buy a song from their music store.

  18. My prediction by borgdows · · Score: 0

    Duke Nukem Forever will be delayed for 2005!

  19. IPod by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just can't buy it. I have a perfectly nice MP3 player that's really small, and only cost me about 180 dollars, as opposed to 300 for the smallest ipod. Sure that big 40 gig ipod is cool, but I'm not paying 500 dollars for something I'll carry/drop while jogging.

    For a lot of Mac products, the extra quality is worth the extra price, but I really don't see it for the ipod.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:IPod by ITR81 · · Score: 1

      Most people want MP3 player that can hold more then hr or two worth of music. Main reason Apple will introduce the mini-iPod at $100-200 bucks in 2GB and 4GB range.

    2. Re:IPod by ircShot_guN · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ipod is actually extremely good value for money.

      $100 for a 256meg Portable Mp3 Player = 40 cents per megabyte.
      $500 for a 40gig Ipod = 1.25 cents per megabyte.

      Provided your legal music collection is at least 1.25 gigabytes in size, you end up with the same value for money, and I know which one is cooler.

    3. Re:IPod by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Never seen it that way... Not that I own a MP3 player. I'm not really into the market for one. I am one of these people that still buy CD's and never bothered to rip any of his CD to harddisk. I find it too much work (swapping disks all the time).

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:IPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apple's clientele is primarily composed of wealthy Americans. Although some Apple computers do find their way into business and industry, 99% serve as toys and decorative items of the rich. Borrowing some vocabulary from Howard Dean's book, isn't it ludicrous for some wealthy "metrosexual" to be listening on his iPod to black delta bluesmen moaning out their hard luck stories? I suppose listening to "the blues" on an iPod it is some sort of compensation for the guilt they feel.

      "I've got the iPod blues. My life is so hard. My batteries only last 9 hours ... I've got the blues ..."

    5. Re:IPod by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      Go ahead, buy one, drop it, it'll be fine. I've dropped mine in a puddle and it's running fine still.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    6. Re:IPod by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Ipod is actually extremely good value for money.

      ..when you compare it to a product with very poor value for money.

      For example, $40 for an mp3 CD player works out at under 6 cents per megabyte. Sure, still worse than the iPod, but (a) unit cost generally goes down when you spend a larger amount, so at over 12 times the price, it's not surprising you get better value, and (b) if you're prepared to carry some extra CDs with you, value for money rockets (say 25 cents a CD gives 0.035 cents per megabyte for the extra storage).

      More appropriately, you could compare it to other hard disk based mp3 players. All your figures really show is that the memory based ones are bad value for money (which they are, unless you want something cheap with no moving parts).

    7. Re:IPod by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

      Well. I have played with the idea. Should I buy memory stick or cd burner. Yes, indeed, I haven't bought cd burner yet. Just listening to music on my PC.

      You have to add one side to this math.
      There ara other nuisances that does'nt convert directly into dollars.

      My options are (the cheapest first)
      - cd writer
      - memory stick
      - iPod or some clone
      - laptop

      Burning CD-s. It takes time to rip, it takes time to burn. It is quite annoying and tiresome activity.

      iPod. Good, but why to carry a high disk wih me. Yes, there is risk that it crashes. At home I could use my PC that stores more bits and sounds.

      So I decided to choose between memory stick or laptop. Or both of them.

      The main factor that influenced this decision is that it is so convinient to renew music in a memory stick.

      Actually I haven't bought new laptop or memory stick. Just decided to extend HD of my PC. Still shopping around.

    8. Re:IPod by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Maybe power users want a lot of space, but I'm not so sure about the average user. With the exception of long trips, most people (admittedly only the ones I know) will only use their MP3 players for short amounts of time - the gym, etc. I have an old nomad II that I still use often. It takes smart media which is very cheap these days. If I need more space I just purchase another card. Add to that the fact that I separate my music by categories (I'm sure I'm not the only one) so each card is easily labeled by the category.

      Do I come off as cheap? Probably, but why retire something that still functions perfectly and has long battery life?

    9. Re:IPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went instead for a mini-CD player (Memorex brand) that uses the 8cm mini-CDs (210Mb).

      I also have a few dozen regular sized MP3 CDs for the car, the computer, a MP3 CD boombox and the regular sized MP3 CD player. Each CD is either one artist (or closely related styles), or a collection of stuff from the same genre.

      Makes it easy to switch around, peruse the collection, make copies for the car and not worry about losing something.

    10. Re:IPod by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? I dropped mine in a black hole, now I can't find it. What is that you say? I never had one? You could be right. I will hold off for the rumored 15 gig entry level one on the horizon.

      --
      I hate sigs.
  20. Return of the Mac? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Return of the Mac? Mark Morrison is singing again?!

    Noooooo!!!!

  21. For those with weak vocabularies... by Yoda2 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...it was nice of the author to provide an explanation of the word "consolidate":

    Some of the music download stores which opened in 2003, and are set to open in 2004, will "consolidate" - that is, close or merge, because it's not a great money-making market.

    1. Re:For those with weak vocabularies... by kelzer · · Score: 1

      ...it was nice of the author to provide an explanation of the word "consolidate"

      Yeah, and it would have been even nicer if his explanation were correct! Since when does "consolidate" mean "close"?

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    2. Re:For those with weak vocabularies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just for completeness, the author should have given the definition of "laser".

      Seriously, was I the only one to picture Dr. Evil raising his hands putting in quotes the word "consolidate" reading the above sentence?

    3. Re:For those with weak vocabularies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When businesses consolidate in today's economy, closing some of the redundant functionality is inevitable. Get with the times.

    4. Re:For those with weak vocabularies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the author's intent when he quoted the word and provided a definition was to call attention the spin businesses put on such events in press releases in an attempt to cast the news in a positive light.

  22. Vijjo Games by grubi · · Score: 1

    Quick question: what's coming out first? Longhorn or Duke Nukem Forever?

    --
    Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
    1. Re:Vijjo Games by borgdows · · Score: 0

      Longhorn is a codename and the retail version will be named Windows Forever!

  23. music download stores by WebTurtle · · Score: 1

    Interesting article, but his predictions about online music stores are still not foreward thinking enough. Anyway, here are two things that I think won't happen but would be cool:
    1) music download stores should offer a browsing/shopping experience that merges Internet ease with brick-and-mortar interaction; 2) brick-and-mortar stores should offer downloading/burning stations in stores.

    Suggestion #1 really means offering an interface that allows online music store customers to see who else is in the "aisle" their browsing through, and chat with them, while listening to an "aisle" specific audio stream that users in that aisle can manipulate. For example:
    Mindy75: hey, WebTurtle, have you heard the new Radiohead? Is it worth it?
    WebTurtle: Hi. Yes, it's good. But have you heard their live album? It's even better.
    Mindy75: Oh, no I haven't.
    WebTurtle: Let's cue it up--I suggest the third track.

    This is cool because it returns the human interaction element of going to a physical store and brings it to the online environment, while adding all the potential benefits of an online environment, such as streaming audio previews of any song on any album, and instant purchasing.

    Suggestion #2 is a way for physical music stores to compete with online music stores. Many people don't want to buy music online or have the resources to download music to their computer. But why not extend the benefits of buying individual tracks in-house? These people can come to the store and use a kiosk to preview and download songs that can be burned to disc while they wait or burned to be picked up later (e.g., after shopping in some other stores in the mall). This is a great way to get a single without all the crappy extra shit that comes on the CD single; also a great way to make mix CDs.

    Anyway, I've been dreaming of these two suggestions for about three years now, but I don't have the wherewithall to implement either of them. But, nobody else has done it yet, either... at least not to my knowledge. I think it's a cool idea -- especially suggestion #1.

    --
    ------- "One of the joys of travel is visiting new towns and meeting new people." -- G. KHAN
    1. Re:music download stores by FiskeBoller · · Score: 1

      Interesting. The major players with chat services are likely candidates; AOL, MSN, and Yahoo have the user base to make it worthwhile, and the backing to implement it. I could see Microsoft launch its online music service, then integrate it with IM. Why not? It offers a unique differentiator and erects a compatability barrier for MS IM, encouraging MSN. Two birds with one (rolling) stone.

    2. Re:music download stores by WebTurtle · · Score: 1

      My vision goes beyond chat. It's more like the combination of an online storefront with IRC and Shoutcast.

      The users browse certain genre "aisles" (i.e., Channels) and each aisle has it's own audio stream. Each audio stream plays a default music album from that genre (which is selected by the store)--similar to if you went into Newbury Comics and were listening to the employees' selection on the store PA, but genre specific.

      The audio stream can be preempted by activating the music preview feature, to preview the songs from an album you are interested in buying -- this results in an individual stream to your computer, but the channel stream still continues for others in the aisle.

      However, if you are chatting with others in the aisle and want to share a musical selection with everyone else, the channel audio stream can operate like a jukebox by allowing each user in the aisle to submit one song at a time into the playlist (to prevent hogging the stream). Leave the channel and your song is removed (or you can delete it yourself sooner).

      Done browsing the Rock section? Move along to the Jazz section by changing asiles (channels) and you are now browsing the Jazz artists, listening to (and interacting with) the Jazz aisle's audio stream, and chatting with the other people in the Jazz aisle.

      Hey, you get a private message from your friend Walsh1975 who is over in the Electronica section, so you switch aisles again to see what cool thing he's found to listen to.

      Thus, in any given trip to the online store, you can listen to various types of music and interact with various different people to broaden your musical horizons and probably end up buying more music than you would have originally done had you visited the online store alone in the vaccuum of cyberspace. But more importantly, you would have a community experience that would be positive and encourage you to return to that store again in the future.

      If anyone wants to use this idea, go ahead. But please remember: you heard it here first! ;)

      Although, I'd rather see someone from the open source community implement this than Microsoft, but obviously I can't control that (not being a developer myself).

      --
      ------- "One of the joys of travel is visiting new towns and meeting new people." -- G. KHAN
  24. Processor wars by sparklingfruit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This year is the year we go 64 bit! Which is actually quite a big thing (remember when we went 32 bit?)

    The rivalry between AMD and Intel is getting pretty intense, and they're level right now. Who do you think will end up on top by this time next year?

    It's going to be down to If I had to say, I would vouch for Intel. They have the money and tech. I do love AMDs inexpensive chips though. It will be good to see who brings the world into 64-bit and who screws up.

    1. Re:Processor wars by argent · · Score: 1

      We went 64-bit in the middle '90s.

      If you haven't gone 64-bit by now, you probably don't need to. If you really need to, you've done it already. If you need to and you haven't, why the hell not?

      For the near future: I can see a point to processors with more address lines, so the OS can load more 32-bit apps, yes, but that's nothing that the user or the application can see or needs to see.

    2. Re:Processor wars by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      This year is the year we go 64 bit! Which is actually quite a big thing (remember when we went 32 bit?)

      The rivalry between AMD and Intel is getting pretty intense, and they're level right now. Who do you think will end up on top by this time next year?

      I went 64 bit last year. Ho hum, old news, move along.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    3. Re:Processor wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went 4-bit.

  25. Pointless and dumb! by rueger · · Score: 2, Troll

    Who on earth posted this?? "The ubiquity of the iPod"? Where? Just because Macheads are gobbling the things up doesn't make it "ubiquitous" except within Mac circles. One can argue that cheapo MP3 players are far more "ubiquitous" than anything that Apple sells.

    "The return of the Mac"? Does that mean 4.1% of market share instead of 4.05%?

    Memory sticks as life changing? Sheesh - if my life was that pathetic I'd find a new life or take up raising sea monkeys.

    All in all this is about the most pathetic list I've seen yet. But then I haven't looked at the other four or five that were posted last night...

    1. Re:Pointless and dumb! by znu · · Score: 3, Informative
      The top five MP3 players for November, according to IDC:
      1. 10GB Apple iPod
      2. 128MB Digitalway
      3. 20GB Apple iPod
      4. 128MB iRiver
      5. 40GB Apple iPod
      So, Apple's got three out of the top five. And that's despite the fact that the cheapest iPod costs more than twice as much as the iRiver or Digitalway.
      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    2. Re:Pointless and dumb! by ITR81 · · Score: 1

      Most iPods over this holiday season wasn't bought by the Mac people but by Wintel people. Apple will have cheap iPod in about 5 days from now. It is the return of the Mac because sales have shown a 40% increase in sales of Mac's which is pretty good considering PC sales have slowed but Mac sales continue to rise. They will rise even more when the G5 hit 3+Ghz mid yr.

    3. Re:Pointless and dumb! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It a simple mistake of word confusion. The article obviously meant obsequious.

    4. Re:Pointless and dumb! by kelzer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Memory sticks as life changing? Sheesh - if my life was that pathetic I'd find a new life or take up raising sea monkeys.

      But here you are posting to Slashdot early on New Years Day. So, how are your sea monkeys doing?

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5. Re:Pointless and dumb! by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I normally do nothing (for instance, I read /.) on new years day. For a good reason. So how was your new years eve?

    6. Re:Pointless and dumb! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      despite the fact that the cheapest iPod costs more than twice as much as the iRiver or Digitalway

      iRiver.................128MB
      Digitalway........ ..128MB
      Cheapest iPod..1240MB (10 GB)

      Can you believe they have the nerve to charge TWICE as much?!?! LOL

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  26. My prediction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While homosexuality gradually loses its popularity, mare sex gains wider recognition in IT, scientific and other tech-related circles.

  27. Calling all h4x0rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.)

    Heya boys!!

    Is this true???

    1. Re:Calling all h4x0rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this true???

      yes if you are on windows, MS also adds themselves to the Administrators list in XP so if billGates wants your box its his for the taking

    2. Re:Calling all h4x0rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you maybe be interested in purchasing a tinfoil hat? Like new, almost unused, double-layered, real bargain!

  28. Re:A prediction of my own: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    BSD is undead. That's why you can't kill it.

  29. Crappy Predictions by gralem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is wrong with this picture (paraphrasing) "in 2004, the cost of 256 MB USB memory will cut in half from it's current $223 (125 pound) price". What planet is he buying flash memory from?

    "Spam will get worse"

    "Apple won't release a tablet, phone, or camera"

    These are some of the most amazingly crappy predictions I've ever seen. Easily half of them have already come true. The rest are obvious enough that my 5-year-old already knows they will happen.

    ---gralem

    1. Re:Crappy Predictions by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      For instance:

      Digital media players will be released which can store and display gigabytes of photos. Hard disk space and small liquid crystal displays are cheap; and both nature and marketing people abhor a vacuum.

      Ummmm....I bought one last June. It's called a FlashTrax. I got the 30GB one, but I think they're up to 80GB now. It backs up compact flash cards from digital cameras, displays the photos on it's 3.5" LCD, and can also play MP3s. The battery life is pretty crappy, though.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  30. Good prediction... by Pollux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    USB "flash memory" sticks will become very popular, and applications will be released that can be stored on them to run on any computer without altering its settings.

    These things are hard to part with once you get them. They're so nice to have, being able to carry around documents or what have you, but the only thing that stinks about them is that you can't just "hand them off" to others like you can do with floppy disks or CD-Rs. When something like that costs $40 or $50, it's hard to let it go.

    The other disappointing thing is that, unlike Floppys / CDs, if your system goes to hell, the BIOS isn't equipped to automatically boot or mount a USB memory stick, leaving you shit outa luck if Windows is behaving badly (reminds me of the time I thought I could help someone install a service pack on an XP machine by keeping it on my memstick...turns out that he needed the service pack to help fix a problem he had with USB devices (downloaded and installed a USB 2.0 driver fix for his motherboard that needed XP SP1, which he didn't have) and it left us both high and dry until I got back and burned it onto CD...he didn't really want to wait four or five hours to download the 50MB file from his modem).

    But you know, I'd LOVE to see a bootable pendrive option...it would be so sweet and easy to help someone fix their computer by just plugging your handy-dandy USB memstick right into a USB port and have everything right there at your fingertips, rather than carry around bulky CD-R media.

    1. Re:Good prediction... by ravy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Those already exist.

      Although I haven't tried them personally.

    2. Re:Good prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want bootable USB, you could of course just buy a Mac.

    3. Re:Good prediction... by HawkinsD · · Score: 1

      This is indeed a good prediction. Bootable CDs, like Knoppix and Mandrake's new MandrakeMove,are just too irresistable, when used with a memory stick. I've tried the Knoppix one, and DAMN, it Just Works, even on a clapped-out old laptop with hardware issues. Lots of different kinds of knowledge workers can put their whole (current) work-lives on a little stick, and then just use whatever machine they can borrow time on. "Bulky" CDs? surely you have room in your briefcase / bag for one thin CD.

      --
      Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
    4. Re:Good prediction... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      None of those said that they were bootable. Some of them look nice, but I don't know about wearing a disk connected to you by its removeable cover. Seems to be something that would quickly be lost.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Good prediction... by ravy · · Score: 1

      You mean apart from lines like "USB boot supported" and "Bundled AP supports secured, boot up and disk partition functions"?

    6. Re:Good prediction... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You're right. I should have searched instead of trying to read the *** page.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:Good prediction... by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      Yessss!!! Knoppix-on-a-stick!!! And writable too! Well, that would mean that most of the time you won't need to carry a laptop around, as long as you know you can "parasite" someone else's machine (think conference venue, University labs, public libraries, cybercafes...) with your own OS + configs + data...

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    8. Re:Good prediction... by scottgfx · · Score: 1

      With the iPod, you could put an install on that and boot your machine from it. Well, some people can anyway.

      --
      It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
  31. camera phones by LowTolerance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Camera phones will never be that big. I work at a cell phone store, and the only people interested in buying one are people too young to sign on a contract. Sure, we sell some here and there, but most people see no need for it, because there isn't one. My thinking is that PDA phones and smart phones are the next big thing. They have the benefit of actually having added functionality.

  32. In the Year 2000. In the Year 2 Thousaaaaaaaaaand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man will learn self propelled flight, only to fly to the local beer store to pick up a 12 pack and fly home to watch TV.

  33. New Predictions ? by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The ubiquity of the iPod, the return of the Mac, and the simplicity of the portable memory stick

    Haven't all these happened already ?

  34. Uh....these are predictions? by deanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This guy isn't going out on a limb at all.

    A few picks from his list:

    "Spam will get worse before it gets better",

    Well..... yeah!

    "legal music download sites will arrive properly"

    already happened

    "The majority of the download stores will keep using Microsoft's Windows Media Audio format, but Apple won't support that on the iPod."

    Of course.

    " Picture phones will become pervasive; it'll be unusual not to have one."

    This is not going out on a limb. It'll be hard NOT to buy a phone with a camera in it, since that's the trend already.

    "Neither the Windows Media Center nor tablet PC formats will take off. Both will grumble along in background sales, but won't ever become mainstream products, nor even significant in sales terms."

    Already happened. In fact, MS already sent out letters dumping the tablet PC within the last week.

    1. Re:Uh....these are predictions? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Already happened. In fact, MS already sent out letters dumping the tablet PC within the last week.

      I must have missed that. It was one I thought was going to fail. People have moved on to keyboards. Pen computing is useful where space is limited (like a Palm 3) or would have made sense in the 80s before people had evolved onto keyboards).

    2. Re:Uh....these are predictions? by ITR81 · · Score: 1

      When in regard to the music stores arriving properly he was talking about to the rest of the world not just the US. Apple is set to release stores for Europe, Japan, Australia, and Canada sometime this yr.

    3. Re:Uh....these are predictions? by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      Of course he's not going out on a limb. This isn't a tech article, it's a piece in a mainstream (British) daily newspaper informing people about what sort of technology they can expect to see in the next few months. Nothing to see here so move along.

      The most interesting thing was his advice to not buy a PC with Windows.

      HH
      --

    4. Re:Uh....these are predictions? by slittle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, of course.. because there's no such thing as legal online music until one of them is owned by Apple.

      Insert :rolleyes: here.

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
  35. root ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "* If you're buying a computer in the coming year, don't get one that uses Windows. It's simply too insecure. (Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.) Get one with the Linux operating system installed (Evesham does them, for example) or an Apple machine running OSX. Both systems are fast, stable and secure. With Windows XP... well, sometimes two out of three really IS bad."

    has this guy heard of root?

    1. Re:root ? by bj8rn · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not root he's talking about, he's alluding to the secret "administrator", the one that has powers any root can only dream of at best. The greatest of these superpowers is perhaps the power to create a rock so big that even God can't move it. But even though every hacker knows about this, noone has yet managed to crack the password (There's one group called the Kabbalists who have been trying to break it for more than a thousand years but still haven't had any luck). The Windows operating systems, however, seem to have holes that make cracking it much easier (think ten years of hard work instead of a million). This is also the reason why some tend to associate Windows with Satan.

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:root ? by krygny · · Score: 1

      OK, every Win<NT | 2000 | XP> install has a built-in local "Administrator" account without the password set. Is this what he's talking about? It's only a secret if you don't know about it. If he's talking about something else, well then, to me, it is a secret.

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    3. Re:root ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm try the fact that winXP had a couple of users hidden from the average Joe User which had aministrative privilleges - and could also cause an XP install to stop existing - on WinXP Home, try adding the user "Administrator" you get the error "User already Exists" (there is no visible Administrator account however as the machines "Admin" user is named after the person who installed it). When confronted with this "Super User" question, MS said that it was "For aiding users when they called for help and able to be used by authorised MS staff over Remote Desktop when the user gives permission"

  36. How is this any different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.)

    Did you know that there is a secret "root" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.

    1. Re:How is this any different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No there isn't, not on every machine. With a bit of effort and some rather experimental patches, you can have a completely rootless linux box, it's just more of a pain to administer because you have to faff with both kernel capabilities, filesystem records of kernel capabilities, and filesystem ACLs.

    2. Re:How is this any different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh pulezze. The level of person to be shocked by the fact that there is a "hidden" administrator account on windoze is NOT going to be the person who installs experimental patches on their Linux boxen to make it rootless. For the audience intended, the effect is EXACTLY the same. Experimental patches, yeah, right.

  37. Add telephone interaction by WebTurtle · · Score: 1

    Why not go a step further and add telephone notification or email notification to the system, plus ability to remote control the system from your phone via Java or email. Here in Japan, everyone's mobile phone has email and all the new ones can run Java apps; in fact, the very latest Vodafone has a digital TV tuner. According to Charles Arthur's predictions for 2004, everyone in the States will have fancy phones, too. Imagine the following: The home security system can send updates in real-time to the homeowner, including video-feeds from the outdoor or indoor cameras. From the mobile phone the homeowner can run a Java app to send commands back to the home security system (or send them via email if the phone doesn't support Java). Incoming email: someone is tresspassing. Remote Homeowner: *uses Java app to view video feed* -- ah, it's just my son coming home from school. Incoming email: someone is tresspassing. Remote Homeowner: *sees video feed: it's a stranger* -- selects option to play audio warning on outdoor speakers. (if that doesn't work, he or she can dial the police and report a burglary in real time!) Incoming alert: someone is tresspassing. Remote Homeowner: ah, it's Ned Flanders. *selects option to play sound of Homer snoring*

    --
    ------- "One of the joys of travel is visiting new towns and meeting new people." -- G. KHAN
  38. Top 5 doesn't mean squat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know anyone with an iPod. I know alot of people with Zens, Jukeboxes, Archoses, and a couple of Rios and iRivers.

    Everyone said iPods are flying off the shelves but all my local stores had all three sizes in stock the day before Christmas. Couldn't find a 30GB Zen though.

    1. Re:Top 5 doesn't mean squat by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1, Troll

      You're right. Your anecdotal evidence is much more valid than IDC's top five.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Top 5 doesn't mean squat by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Maybe you couldn't find a Zen because they weren't selling well so the store only ordered a small limited stock?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Top 5 doesn't mean squat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you care, here is my version:

      I stopped in at the local Fry's the day after xmas and the 10GB and 20GB iPods were sold out. There were still some of the most expensive (40GB) models left on the shelf. And this is up here in Microsoft country!

  39. Knoppix USB by Guiri · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have a look at this. You can boot Knoppix (or a stripped down version) from a USB memory stick. Cheers.

  40. better formatting (sorry) by WebTurtle · · Score: 1

    Why not go a step further and add telephone notification or email notification to the system, plus ability to remote control the system from your phone via Java or email.

    Here in Japan, everyone's mobile phone has email and all the new ones can run Java apps; in fact, the very latest Vodafone has a digital TV tuner. According to Charles Arthur's predictions for 2004, everyone in the States will have fancy phones, too. Imagine the following:

    The home security system can send updates in real-time to the homeowner, including video-feeds from the outdoor or indoor cameras. From the mobile phone the homeowner can run a Java app to send commands back to the home security system (or send them via email if the phone doesn't support Java).

    Incoming email: someone is tresspassing.
    Remote Homeowner: *uses Java app to view video feed* -- ah, it's just my son coming home from school.

    Incoming email: someone is tresspassing.
    Remote Homeowner: *sees video feed: it's a stranger* -- selects option to play audio warning on outdoor speakers. (If that doesn't work, he or she can dial the police and report a burglary in real time!)

    Incoming alert: someone is tresspassing.
    Remote Homeowner: ah, it's Ned Flanders. *selects option to play sound of Homer snoring*

    --
    ------- "One of the joys of travel is visiting new towns and meeting new people." -- G. KHAN
  41. Not so insightful if it's wrong .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing came of the PPC? Uh, how about the fact that Apple continues to exist? Sure the 603/4 didn't set the world on fire, but the point was to move the architecture in a direction to sustain Apple well into the future.

    Most would argue that it was OSX that has created the next "wave". Yes, everyone is happy about the G5, but it's small potatoes compared to the software changes that Apple made. Apple as a company has been on a decent roll, iMac, OSX, iPod, Powerbook/iBook, G5 so I think your four year cycle analogy is all wet.

  42. When it comes to viruses, he gets it but doesn't.. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree with what he said about viruses - that there will be more viruses out there that send spam, steal credit card info, steal passwords, ect. I'm not sure about his claim that those virus writers will be members of organized crime, though.

    However, he also says that viruses won't be that destructive because people who have made recent viruses didn't have them destroy hard drives when they could have. What he ignores is that a virus that destroys it's host is pretty much useless, because it no longer has that host. Viruses like Blaster and Sinkin are dangerous and destructive because they continue to spread for months while the user does not know they are infected. If the virus killed it's host quickly it would not spread nearly as much.

  43. He's right! ...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm chucking my tape deck to buy four different units, one that plays, one that rewinds, one that fast forwards, and one that records. Did I mention I own 15 pairs of shoes. I put one pair on to walk to the car (might have to walk across the grass), another pair to drive the car, one pair to walk from the car to my office (no grass, but lots of concrete and cement floors), one pair to wear while I'm sitting at my desk, another pair if I need to go to the bathroom (rubber soles to keep all the "splash puddle" gunk at bay), a different pair to go to meetings (comfy to walk across the carpet and sit for extended periods).

    1. Re:He's right! ...... by grubi · · Score: 1

      Boy, talk about taking it to bizarre ends. How obtuse you are.

      Not every device needs to be a Swiss army knife.

      --
      Actually, information would like a turkey sandwich.
  44. Apple should abandon the iPod ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... since SatanicPuppy says that it makes no sense for HIM. Because SP doesn't need to carry gigs worth of songs, no one else should have to. Because SP's budget doesn't call for spending such a sum, no one else should. Because SP is butter fingered, no one else should spend extra since they're just gonna bust it anyway.

    sheesh

    1. Re:Apple should abandon the iPod ... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yawn. Yea, I could buy a 500 dollar ipod so I can carry whatever absurd number of songs that thing holds, or I could buy a cheaper one that holds all the songs I'll be able to listen to before the battery dies.

      I could afford it, but why? Just to have a 500 dollar portable mp3 player? Seems like the only reason. Chicks may dig the bling bling, but I'd rather have a nice laptop.

      And as for my lack of coordination, I wonder what fantasy world you live in that you never drop a portable music player? Of course, if I blew 500 dollars on an mp3 player, I'd probably never go anywhere that wasn't heavily carpeted either.

      And, in conclusion, stupid AC posting mac fanatics can go shove their mad expensive ipods up their collective tight asses. Thank you very much.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  45. Brain virus by thefinite · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see Apple surviving past 2005.

    I don't see you making much headway as a fortune-teller, let alone a business analyst. (I know, "same difference")

    I have decided that the "Apple is dying" thing is a disease. It has to be some sort of brain-inhabiting virus that just keeps moving from host to host. No matter what you do to stamp it out (facts, figures, lobotomies), it has already moved on to the next susceptible (i.e. apple-bashing, close-minded) brain. I guess we will have to live with it. It almost makes me wish Apple did die, just so these people will finally *shut up*.

    (By the way, in between the PPC, iMac, and G5 you have things like the Titanium Powerbook, iMovie and all of the other amazing iApps, OS X, and, of course, the iPod and iTunes Music Store. So, yes, your theory is a bunch of garbage.)

    --
    Boom Shanka
  46. who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by xlurker · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • (And if you want to check my predictions for 2003 - which I'd say stand up well - they're online at http://news. independent.co.uk/digital/features/story.jsp?story =366810).

      yeah. sure.
      did anybody actually click on this? You have to pay to read the 2003 article...

    • Some of the music download stores ... will "consolidate" - that is, close or merge, because ...

      very kind of him to explain "consolidate"
      oh, btw what does "galvanise" mean?

    • The majority of the download stores will keep using Microsoft's Windows Media Audio format, but Apple won't support that on the iPod.

      is this really noteworthy? all download stores use mp3.

    • At least one other download store will join Apple in using the Dolby "AAC" encoding format, because that's the only way to reach iPod owners.

      yeah. sure.

    • USB "flash memory" sticks ... and applications will be released that can be stored on them to run on any computer without altering its settings.

      aka "files"
      on the computer there will be a general software framework that can "read" these "files" and enable you to "work" with the "contents" independent of the OS and hardware: document files, excel files, image files, html files, audio files.

    • You could soon carry a stripped-down operating system in your pocket to boot any machine to look like yours.

      can anyone imagine normal users doing that?

    • There won't be a single virus or worm that attacks the Mac OSX operating system.

      I don't use the Mac, but I can't imagine that to be true: document and email macro viruses?
    --
    ______________________________________________
    sigamajig...
    1. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      You could soon carry a stripped-down operating system in your pocket to boot any machine to look like yours.
      can anyone imagine normal users doing that?

      Not to mention the part where computers have different hardware...

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    2. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by davecb · · Score: 1
      xlurker wrote: You could soon carry a stripped-down operating system in your pocket to boot any machine to look like yours.

      can anyone imagine normal users doing that?

      Actually I do at work: when I'm not at my desk, I stick my badge in a local machine and it pops up my saved session. The whole OS isn't on the chip, but that's mostly due to cost issues.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    3. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      There won't be a single virus or worm that attacks the Mac OSX operating system.

      I don't use the Mac, but I can't imagine that to be true: document and email macro viruses?


      Hasn't happened yet, after three years of OS X, and there's no reason to think that'll change in 04. Document macro viruses are technically possible, as IIRC the macros that work on Office for Win also work on Office for Mac. But it seems as if virus writers prefer to hit the low-hanging fruit, which is email and/or auto-propagating worms that exploit a hole in an Internet facing service.

      And, email viruses don't exist on the Mac for this one simple reason: email clients on the Mac don't auto-execute attachments, ever; they don't have that "feature" available, let alone on by default. In fact, if Microsoft turned off this feature by default, wouldn't that stop cold most infection attempts?

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the speed of flash memory...

    5. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by burns210 · · Score: 1

      "is this really noteworthy? all download stores use mp3. " Simply not true. iTMS, for one, is .aac (i believe is the entension). And all the others use Windows Media files for DRMness "can anyone imagine normal users doing that? " I could imagine Windows user profiles being saved on a stick drive, and once plugged, it logins you in with your user, settings, documents). That could very well happen. "I don't use the Mac, but I can't imagine that to be true: document and email macro viruses?" Talk to me in 12 months.. virus or worm that infects macs, i have my money on the author, but i suppose you could be right.

    6. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the first post. This is more readable.

      "is this really noteworthy? all download stores use mp3. "

      Simply not true. iTMS, for one, is .aac (i believe is the entension). And all the others use Windows Media files for DRMness

      "can anyone imagine normal users doing that? "

      I could imagine Windows user profiles being saved on a stick drive, and once plugged, it logins you in with your user, settings, documents). That could very well happen.

      "I don't use the Mac, but I can't imagine that to be true: document and email macro viruses?"

      Talk to me in 12 months.. virus or worm that infects macs, i have my money on the author, but i suppose you could be right.

    7. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is just naive. Any OS is vunerable because in the end, the user is the last and most important line of defense. If a virus writer wants to, he/she will design the said virus to exploit stupid users.

      No OS is excluded from this bug.

    8. Re:who else when reading thought: yeah. sure. by ericrolph · · Score: 1
      There won't be a single virus or worm that attacks the Mac OSX operating system.


      I don't use the Mac, but I can't imagine that to be true: document and email macro viruses?

      Yes, no viruses of any kind - believe it.
  47. Phones already have more than 1 megapixel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like for example this phone here: Samsung SCH V420

  48. Damn...some good predictions for once by Spoing · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was expecting some lame article, and true many of the predictions are of the "Duh..." variety, though a few were quite interesting as well as plausable;
    1. * USB "flash memory" sticks (which you plug in to a port on a computer to provide extra storage space) will become very popular, and applications will be released that can be stored on them to run on any computer without altering its settings. Presently, 256Mb costs 125; expect that to halve this year. You could soon carry a stripped-down operating system in your pocket to boot any machine to look like yours. In the long term, this could lead to stripped-down computers where the machine holds no important data; it'd all be on the USB stick.

    That's something I'm looking into and it is very interesting. 256M, though, is not enough. A 1G USB stick could be the sweet spot for having both apps, data, and (optionally) an entire OS. At current prices for 1G sticks, though, I can't see many people doing it so development will be stalled.

    Most apps need to be installed or require a runtime environment that has to be installed

    To boot a USB stick currently requires BIOS changes or a boot diskette/CD and waiting. The alternative is to have a VM of some sort 'run' the OS as a guest.

    Fixing either of these issues seamlessly will take awhile...probably won't happen in 2004.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    1. Re:Damn...some good predictions for once by cybernezumi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we really need here is for OS's to allow home directories to be seamlessly stored on removable media like memory cards and iPods. Just plug in the device and the fast user switching asks if you'd like to log in as that user. Also need for aps to accept being installed in such home directories and the OS to handle privileges in a sensible way (e.g. is this a guest user or someone that is acknowledged as a regular user). Sorta sneakernet NFS...

    2. Re:Damn...some good predictions for once by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      > A 1G USB stick could be the sweet spot for having
      > both apps, data, and (optionally) an entire OS.

      Umm... I guess you haven't heard of Damn Small Linux, then... An OS in less than 50MB.

      Customising it might be restricted to the realm of geeks for the moment, mind.

      (Scroll up the page for a couple of links about booting from USB.)

    3. Re:Damn...some good predictions for once by Spoing · · Score: 1
      I have...and other super-small distros. They're not enough. OpenOffice itself is that big, as are some of my data files.

      A 1G stick would accomidate the OS, apps, tools and data.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    4. Re:Damn...some good predictions for once by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >A 1G USB stick could be the sweet spot for having both apps, data, and (optionally) an entire OS.

      Sure, why not?

      Ideally, I'd like to be able to carry my "computer" on my keychain and have it interface with both private and public thin-clients. Once my OS boots I can get my documents/download apps from a central depository.

      In a pinch I can carry a small thin-client laptop. Heck, why even use USB? If we're pushing one gig, toss in some fault tolerance (mirroring or somesuch) and a high-speed Personal Area Network radio. No need to even take my keys out of my pocket.

    5. Re:Damn...some good predictions for once by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      Actually, you can use Knoppix and a USB-flash stick to do this. Of course, you could set up your installation to do it automatically, off the hard drive. But I don't see most people willing to do this (and in an enterprise environment, NFS home directories make much more sense).

      Still, it's a nifty idea. I often carry around a Knoppix, and if I get an iPod, I might give this a shot.

  49. BBB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You are very good at deceptive marketing. Apple would be proud to have such supporters who are unable to do fair comparisons (hell, that's you why you use a Mac right?). Why don't you compare the iPod to a device that it's actually intended to compete with that uses similar technology?

    $300 (Amazon) for a 20GB Rio Karma = 1.5 cents per megabyte
    $400 (everywhere) for a 20GB iPod = 2 cents per megabyte

    Also, it's not "Ipod" you fuckhead; it's "iPod."

    1. Re:BBB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just paid $400 for a 30GB ipod at Amazon a couple weeks ago. Let's see: 30GB/$400 = 1.33 cents per megabyte, so who's the fuckhead now?

  50. shout out to all my hommies by squarefish · · Score: 1

    it's not secretary, it's now 'administrative assistant'. secretary was way too gender based.

    mind you, this has not changed the satus of nurse, but that term has had been much less of a differential then secretary for a much longer time

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    1. Re:shout out to all my hommies by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

      Must have been due to some guys working in the position because there doesn't seem to be anything gender biased about the word secretary.

    2. Re:shout out to all my hommies by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      most of the secretaries in the presidential cabinet are men. derf derf.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  51. Easy prediction ... by amw · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Sorry. the story you asked for has not been published yet.
    I predict they'll fix their code sometime in 2004.
  52. you can do that by fabio · · Score: 1, Informative

    on most new mobos, there is a feature to boot off usb HD and pendrives, my soltek mobo has that feature and and i have seen it on older motherboards, unless of course, were speking of two different things here

    --
    *resistance is futile, or fuzzy, i dunno*
  53. Only predictions I will care about by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    • Half-life 2 is released and Steam doesn't cripple it.
    • Doom3 comes out and it can be played on as many machines as the original doom could.
    • Gnome and KDE teams work together and the trolls on either side work together to troll the other desktops.
    • 2.6 patches trickle down signalling ready for use when your ass is on the line.
    • Microsoft announces further delays to Longhorn and some features will be queitly dropped. Signalling the questioning of those who signed up for license 6.0.
    • There will be a review on the different OS's that is not clearly biased one way or the other.
    • Duke Nukem Forever will be released.
    • The Longest Journey 2 will continue on to a 2005 release date.
    • Someone will announce a movie worth watching now the Lord of the Rings has finished.
    • I will finally upgrade the oldest bit on my computer, the bloody monitor, and not be tempted instead to splurge on a new vidcard.
    • Linux/BSD/Mac/Open Office/Evolution use grows so that some big companies decide that supporting only MS formats is like putting someone in front of your shop and turning every Xth customer away. Xth being the value that is the difference between breaking even and profit.
    • The geek becomes the latest fashion accessorie and every girl simply must have one.
    • A major PC game will be released that has not been consolefied.

    Happy new year. We got snow in Holland!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Only predictions I will care about by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      Let me just say, this is off-topic, but I have to give major props to any The Longest Journey fan :)

      I'm sorta disturbed by the fact that they said TLJ2 is going to be action-adventure, though...

  54. Doom3? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "# Doom 3 still won't be released."

    Don't you mean Duke Nukem Forever?

  55. Fuck the mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always all about the iPod and the Mac. Fuck them. Shove them up someone else's asses for a change.

  56. Re:When it comes to viruses, he gets it but doesn' by kelzer · · Score: 1

    What he ignores is that a virus that destroys it's host is pretty much useless, because it no longer has that host.

    Hmmm, not sure how you missed it, but I'm pretty sure that's exactly what he's saying here:

    Any of the viruses which appeared in the past year could have wiped hard disks clean once they'd propagated; they didn't. That suggests that, as in real life, where very few primary infections kill their hosts, the writers of "malware" have realised that destructive programs have shorter lives.
    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  57. Return of the Mac? by Swedentom · · Score: 1

    Return of the Mac, eh? Well, I'm sure Apple's market share will increase, and maybe the Mac will 'return' eventually, but I think it surely will take longer than a year. This is not something that happens over night, you know...

    --
    Sig Nature
  58. Two out of three? by Culturejammer · · Score: 1
    If you're buying a computer in the coming year, don't get one that uses Windows. It's simply too insecure. (Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.) Get one with the Linux operating system installed (Evesham does them, for example) or an Apple machine running OSX. Both systems are fast, stable and secure. With Windows XP... well, sometimes two out of three really IS bad.

    Er? Am I reading this correctly, he ranks Windows two out of three from that list? Well, my Windows box hasn't crashed on me in monthes. But, then again, I havn't turned it on in monthes. No reason to, since I got my Mac.

  59. Re:When it comes to viruses, he gets it but doesn' by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    Well, I did kind of miss that sentance, but at the same time, he started the paragraph with There won't be a huge internet-busting data-destroying worm or virus.

    I would submit that while, say, blaster or code red wasn't a data-destroying worm, it was certainly a very damaging virus to the internet and to networks. The way he starts the sentence makes it sound like data-destroying viruses are more dangerous to the internet, while I would argue that they are less dangerous because they affect fewer people and don't damage networks as much or as long.

  60. Incorrect. by juuri · · Score: 1

    Already happened. In fact, MS already sent out letters dumping the tablet PC within the last week.

    No, they sent out letters killing the wireless "Mira" displays.

    There is a significant difference between the two.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  61. USB drives *are* bootable by geekplus · · Score: 1

    But you know, I'd LOVE to see a bootable pendrive option...it would be so sweet and easy to help someone fix their computer by just plugging your handy-dandy USB memstick right into a USB port and have everything right there at your fingertips, rather than carry around bulky CD-R media

    My Memorex USB Thumbdrive *is* recognized by the BIOS. It *is* bootable. And you *can* put Linux on it.

  62. Correction by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    "3. The US will start another war on $random_country for support of $random_terrorist_group."

    $random_country appears as random, but really is an item from the @countries_of_interest list. But you are right about $random_terrorist_group, except that "Islam" is concatenated to each of these groups.

  63. Outsourcing aside... by slittle · · Score: 1

    Theoretically, the job of the IT industry is to make itself obsolete by self automation (recursive automation?).

    While that won't happen for a long time, if ever, continued improvement in technology/manufacturing processes and an increasingly computer literate population mean fewer and fewer 'support' jobs will be required.

    Once upon a time, any computer was surrounded by scientists; typically the very ones that designed and built it from scratch. Today, hardware generally takes care of itself most of the time (can you remeber the last time you replaced a vacuum tube?), and software is.. well, ok software took a nosedive, but the general populace are getting more literate so it kind of cancels out..

    --
    Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
  64. Well, one thing is already true... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Generally I thought his predictions were pretty good, but this one was a little too late:

    Digital media players will be released which can store and display gigabytes of photos. Hard disk space and small liquid crystal displays are cheap; and both nature and marketing people abhor a vacuum.

    There are already a lot of these things around! There's the Archos if you also want to listen to music, but plenty of photo-only oriented devices like the XDrive or Nixvue Vista. Heck, even the iPod has an attachment to store photos now (no viewing though).

    Some of these devices can even view a few different kinds of RAW files, not just JPG's or movies.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  65. iPod's are nigh invulnerable. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have an iSkin case for it - thin rubber that helps a bit to cushion shocks.

    How durable are they? Well, I won't say why but my iPod has endured multiple repeated hard slams onto a floor - I don't mean dropping it, I mean throwing it as hard as you can at the floor beneath you.

    And of course the HD is almost never actually spinning. Lots of people jog, I use the iPod in my car which can get really bumpy at times, and never has it skipped or been hurt at all.

    If what you want is something where you can jog or hike while listening to music, there really is nothing better than the iPod because of the variety of music you can store.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  66. He didn't say they would be used... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have a loathing for picture phones because I feel as you do. But I wanted good bluetooth support, and bought an Ericson T610... now I have a picture phone. Will I use it? Not much. I tried it once at a concert just for the heck of it and the results were really poor.

    So I think what he's saying here is that every camera maker will get in on the trend of providing a phone in the camera, not so much because consumers demand them as that the companies think they do.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  67. Defined by tepples · · Score: 1

    "Ubiquitous" and "omnipresent" mean "existing everywhere at the same time". "Endemic" means roughly the same thing except within a specific region, sometimes with a sense of being confined to that region.

    "Obsequious" and "servile" mean "submissive to the will of another".

    1. Re:Defined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But pendantic, anal-retentive and clinchpoop are all pretty close, right? :^)

    2. Re:Defined by darkgreen · · Score: 1
      you, my good Coward, have made me happy I decided to lower my threshold today...


      that was the funniest thing i've seen here in a while. perhaps i need to get out more.

      --
      You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
  68. Interesting, but... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ipod and mini ipod will be hit by a wave of cheap replacements that both allow you to store/play music AND video. These will integrate with mobile phones (2G).

    I think instead the wave of small devices coming out to do what you say will be hit by the mini iPod. People might buy a phone with that capability, but still use an iPod.

    Multi processor machines will begin to take off in the business environment. Single user, multi machine setups will smooth the rollout of Linux/OpenOffice and make people more productive

    Businesses will never adopt multiprocessor in a big way because few business users need multiprocessing, most people at a company are very single-task focused. I already saw the push for multi-processor pentium computers die a number of years back. They'll remain a niche very useful for technical people (though the realm of technical jobs will expand slowly).

    Also, few businesses will adopt multi-processor computer for technical people who need them because they are all looking at costs and ubiquity of platform too much and very little at benefit. Ubiquity of platform is unfortunately the watchword at companies today.

    Not that any of that will slow the adoption of Linux.

    Appliances that take advantage of home broadband links and WiFi will take off.

    I see that as being at least two years off still, until Apple tries to build something. No-one else has any good ideas it would seem, and if anyone did they would have announced them early as is the trend (for anyone but Apple).

    Microsoft will get scared, and will run towards early launch of XBox 2 as a home machine. Failure will spell the fall of Microsoft.

    I think you are right about early release, but I'm not so sure about the failure. This remains a big open question as far as I can tell. The game market is really fickle, or at least willing to move platforms quickly. It all depends on the games they get, and the games other don't! Sony will, however, continue to dominate no matter what as they have their finger on the pulse of what is needed to be a really widespread platform.

    The Apple House will be unveiled

    I'm not sure what that means, but it sounds ominous. That's not a Poe reference, is it?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Interesting, but... by sane? · · Score: 1
      OK, sensible answer demands a sensible reply. Here's the thinking.
      ipod and mini ipod will be hit by a wave of cheap replacements that both allow you to store/play music AND video. These will integrate with mobile phones (2G).
      Manufacturers have noted the success of the ipod - they want a slice. Now a straight MP3 player is, in the end, a very simple device (the ipod score with the typical apple design flair). Thus they will look to see how that can be enhanced. One way is to add a video capability (that multi gig drive is good for it). The other is to tie it in with the mobile phone, to yield both a device that will appeal even more to the young, and one where new songs can be bought and downloaded over a GPRS link.
      Multi processor machines will begin to take off in the business environment. Single user, multi machine setups will smooth the rollout of Linux/OpenOffice and make people more productive
      Your typical office machine gets used for two things: 'normal' office stuff (wordprocessing, email, etc.); and 'other' stuff (everything from a developers environment to that special piece of software that's needed for widget X). There is a lot to be said for explicitly partitioning this and locking down the first part hard, as well as having a free OSS solution with which to beat Microsoft over the head. With thing like the EPIA processor, its easy and a potential selling point to put two 'machines' in one box.
      Appliances that take advantage of home broadband links and WiFi will take off.
      Few people have seriously thought about what a high bandwidth, always on connection into millions of homes means. I'm predicting that this year someone will, be it for home security, entertainment, community. And providing the price is right, all those people with home hubs and a machine that's on 10% of the time will buy them.
      Microsoft will get scared, and will run towards early launch of XBox 2 as a home machine. Failure will spell the fall of Microsoft.
      In business, 90% is perception. We know they are getting hit for discounts on the OS and Office, and that the next money spinner is years away. The city is not forgiving of underperformance, and Microsoft knows it. They know that they aren't going to win the smartphone business, PDA is static - all they really have to tell a good story is XBox, and I don't think that they are likely to make a rushed launch a success.

      Of course, Microsoft could go Linux - but either way, they will be running, and running scared.

      The Apple House will be unveiled
      Face it, Apple aren't really a technology company, they are a technology functional design company - understanding how people use technology is where they win. Its sensible and logical to take those core skills and attempt to apply them to all home appliances, if only to do an IKEA and corner the metro set that skirts technology. Thus, the Apple house, where everything is designed to look similar, work well, and work together.

      Mr Jobs, if your reading this, gissa job !

  69. What? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    is this really noteworthy? all download stores use mp3.

    All? Only one, the only one that doesn't offer music from major artists and labels. ITMS uses AAC.

    I also agree with the prediction that one other store will cave to using AAC, after the wave of miniPods arrives and gives the market a sound marketshare thrashing.

    a "files"
    on the computer there will be a general software framework that can "read" these "files" and enable you to "work" with the "contents" independent of the OS and hardware: document files, excel files, image files, html files, audio files.


    You missed the point. He's saying whole applications will be released on USB sticks that you can just plug them in and run - kind of like game carts.

    Can I imagine users doing this? Oh yes.

    I don't use the Mac, but I can't imagine that to be true: document and email macro viruses?

    What email macro viruses? Mail.app doesn't support them - not even Javascript. What document viruses? OS X does not have VBA support needed for these things to work. You fail to understand just how poor Windows security has become and hoe well off other platforms are actually having learned and applied lessons on security.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  70. Mac Viruses by dave1g · · Score: 1
    "There won't be a single virus or worm that attacks the Mac OSX operating system."

    Are ther any statistics on Mac viruses? Obiously we never hear about them because their affect is much less noticable but I'm curious nonetheless.

    1. Re:Mac Viruses by Swedentom · · Score: 1

      Well, at least we know one thing. There is no viruses (that has spread) for Mac OS X, except MS Office macro viruses.

      --
      Sig Nature
    2. Re:Mac Viruses by JonathanF · · Score: 1

      I know there are OS X trojans/viruses/worms out there, but since release I haven't heard of a single attack, and certainly nothing on a significant scale.

    3. Re:Mac Viruses by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Not counting Office macro viruses, there are less than fifty viruses for the 'classic' Mac OS. If you download an old copy of Disinfectant, you can read about all of them and what they do. Very few were malicious. I don't know if there even were any Office macro viruses that were malicious when activated on a Mac-- IME, the Mac was always just a carrier of them.

      There are still no known viruses specific to Mac OS X. Most Mac users I know don't even bother with antivirus software, and the ones who do do it just as a courtesy, so they don't pass along any infected stuff sent to them by a Windows user.

      Trust me, if there was an OS X virus, you'd hear about it-- CNet, ZDNet, and the rest of the Wintel-centric computing press would be tripping over their schadenfreude in their rush to get the story out. If you don't believe me, then you missed this article.

      ~Philly

    4. Re:Mac Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy has a point (GO article link). He gives credit where it's due. OSX is a great fairly robust OS. However, if it had the market share of Windows it would arouse the same hacker bloodlust.

      This has probably been said upteen million times but it bears repeating when it's ignored. The simple fact that a huge vulnerability was discovered and went unexploited vividly illustrates this fact. Even when there is a hole, nobody cares.

      What can be gained by coding a 4% effective worm when you can expect 70+% of hackers to be doing half the work for you on the platform that runs on most home computers. Which is what you're aiming for if you need a good amaturely administrated DDOS farm or "Chinese Lottery".

      Hell a worm wouldn't be noticed by 99% of home users if it didn't blow them off the internet, chew up all of their bandwidth, wipe their system, produce cutesy graphics, or otherwise make themselves extremely obvious.

      In any case, bragging about the security of an encryption algorthim written by myself and used only by myself and a few close buddies is false advertising because nobody really cares if they can crack my files or algorithm because they've only gained one really obscure tool usable in limited circumstances. How many worthwile hackers does that attract? Answer:0

      Change that around and start bragging about an enterprise security system used by the vast majority of very large money making firms. I'll let you finish the analogy.

  71. Don't forget VOIP for consumers by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 1

    I expect consumer use of VOIP will reach flashover for consumers this year, IF the government does not meddle. I think it WILL meddle due to the ranting and raving of local Bell companies. We are already seeing the statements of the FCC in regards to whether they will regulate VOIP.

  72. That is why they are called PREDICTIONS.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and not statements of facts.

    As in: I predict you continue to troll through out the new year and gain no further common sense.

    In other words.. its my GUESS.
    Does this clear things up for you?

  73. Another half-baked potato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that our president's neoliberal economic agenda (referring to his love of "free trade" of coarse) is hurting America. However, I disagree on the main point of your post, which seems to be saying that immigrant workers, and laid off middle class workers pose an immediate threat to the tech savvy rich. Anyhow, these "security methods" you talk about are merely distractions, and if they ever do become popular they will only be useful to scare off the random identity thieving opossums, or perhaps skunks that have been rummaging through the garbage.

    1. Re:Another half-baked potato by Saeger · · Score: 1
      If the gap between the rich and poor keeps increases as quickly as it has, then yeah, the rich has a lot to worry about if the people get angry enough to leave the breadlines and storm the castle^H^H^H^H^H^Hgated communities of billionaires...

      (Fortunately things never got that bad (for the rich) even during the great depression.)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  74. Yeah right. by simetra · · Score: 0

    Don't buy a computer with Windows?

    Instead, buy one with Linux. Then try to find some apps or games that run on it. Try to install them. Try to install the myriad of different libraries that each require, and the myriad of libraries that each of these requirements require.
    Try to print something on your printer. Cry like a baby. Try to copy your pictures off your digital camera. Cry like a baby. Try to share your hard drive so you can access stuff from another computer. Cry like a baby. Hose up system. Go to store and buy a retail copy of Windows and wish you had bought a computer with Windows in the first place.

    I'll say it again, Linux is great and all, but is not a viable desktop system yet, and won't likely be anytime soon. And yes, I'm sure YOU could do all the above just fine, but really, what Typical End User will, realistically, recompile stuff into their kernel, load/unload modules, download and install stuff from .bz2's, .tgz's, or even rpms? What typical end user just happens to know all about using Samba, manually editing text files, changing run levels, mounting stuff from the command line, etc?

    NONE! Really, just because you're an elite hacker who does this stuff for fun doesn't mean it's at all within the realm of possibility for REAL consumers/computer users out there.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Try to print something on your printer.
      >Try to copy your pictures off your digital camera.
      >Try to share your hard drive so you can access stuff from another computer.

      How about this - install Mandrake or SUSE and let it do all that for you.

      What a twat!

    2. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just install mandrake. It does all that stuff for you.

    3. Re:Yeah right. by briansz · · Score: 1

      Instead, buy one with Linux.

      Or buy one with any OS and install Knoppix in twelve minutes.

      Then try to find some apps

      Most are included, apt-get for nearly all the rest.

      or gamesthat run on it.

      Loki, Wine. Loki games sure are cheap on eBay.

      Try to install them. Try to install the myriad of different libraries that each require, and the myriad of libraries that each of these requirements require.

      Something particularly difficult about typing 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get install' ?

      Try to print something on your printer.

      Postscript/CUPS works flawlessly with my APPLE Laserwriter 16/600.

      Cry like a baby.

      Neener Neener, Windows User!

      Try to copy your pictures off your digital camera.

      mount /home/knoppix/Olympus. Drag and drop in Konqueror.

      Try to share your hard drive so you can access stuff from another computer.

      you lack exposure to Samba and the wonders of FTP, the program GFTP specifically.

      Cry like a baby.

      You sure do bitch a lot.

      Hose up system.

      Synonomous with installing Windows.

      Go to store and buy a retail copy of Windows and wish you had bought a computer with Windows in the first place.

      I'm quite confident that day will never come. Buy Windows, you mean people do that? How quaint.

      I'll say it again, Linux is great and all, but is not a viable desktop system yet, and won't likely be anytime soon.

      Sure it is. I've been using it instead of Mac OS9 since April. Is there a learning curve? Absolutely. What I'd really give my left arm (or at least a couple fingers) for is a good INTUITIVE vector-based drawing program. I'd even PAY HANDSOMELY for a port of Mac Graphic Converter. But not pay handsomely enough to buy a Mac these days. Maybe when the 1GHz iBook makes it under $999.

      And yes, I'm sure YOU could do all the above just fine, but really, what Typical End User will, realistically, recompile stuff into their kernel, load/unload modules, download and install stuff from .bz2's, .tgz's, or even rpms?

      I've rarely, if ever had to do any of this with the Knoppix hdinstall.

      What typical end user just happens to know all about using Samba, manually editing text files, changing run levels, mounting stuff from the command line, etc? NONE!

      Finally we can agree on something. Perhaps to my credit, I've been able to apply my generic computer knowledge to learning Linux and use Google for the things I don't understand. But Knoppix really cuts down on those instances. I find it much easier to install and use than many "traditional" distros. Is it perfect? No. But it's damn good. Keep in mind that I jumped in 'cold turkey'. I've run Macs since 1991. I literally sold my much-loved and much-upgraded beige Mac and was left with the dual PIII machine I'm typing this on. I tried Windows 2K and gave up after a week when any attempt to burn CDs resulted in a BSOD and reboot. I began seriously regretting the day I packed up and shipped my Mac. So I installed Mandrake in desparation, used it for a couple months, made some dumb mistakes, then moved to Knoppix. Now I wouldn't have Windows as my desktop OS.

      Really, just because you're an elite hacker who does this stuff for fun

      Not at all. I'm just a fairly bright guy that can learn new things. I was a custom cabinetmaker for ten years, for heaven's sake.

      doesn't mean it's at all within the realm of possibility for REAL consumers/computer users out there.

      Who, pray tell, would be more 'real' than me?

    4. Re:Yeah right. by simetra · · Score: 1

      You are obviously brighter than the typical end user. Most people I know in the real world (outside of geekville), are NOT capable of doing anything you described. Family, friends, people who work in other departments at the place I work, none of THEM, and THEY are who I call typical end users, would have a clue. Having been a support person for Microsoft products, I can tell you from first-hand experience that getting a typical end user to do something as simple as opening a dos window and getting a directory listing is NOT as simple and easy as you and I think; FOR TYPICAL END USERS .

      And yes, I have been using/configuring samba via command line text editors for years, thank you. My mom, however, who is a little brighter than the typical end user, does not have a clue about the concept of sharing directories in Windows. The thought of trying to get her to understand this, and to teach her how to configure Samba, is horrifying!

      Really, REAL END USERS are quite different from those of us in geekville who don't mind figuring this stuff out on our own. Most don't want to know, and shouldn't be asked to. That's why they have Windows. It would be nice if Linux could serve as a replacement, but it simply can't, not now anyway, and probably not any time soon.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  75. Apple's Future by Vodak · · Score: 1

    Why is it that for the past couple of years we hear that Apple's MACS are returning? Didn't they return with the IPod last year or the IMAC so long ago? What the hell? Do they keep getting flat tires on their way to the party?

    My prediction is that pro apple people will continue to say the ay of apple is on the horizon. *note I like apple I just find it funny that we hear the same pro apple stories very couple of months*

    1. Re:Apple's Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that for the past couple of years we hear that Apple's Macs are returning?

      Because with each year, Apple hardware is chipping away at the perceived performance gap with x86 hardware. Every year, OS X has gotten better and run a little faster than its predecessor did on identical hardware. Every year, more people get sick enough of some shortcoming of Windows to take a serious look at a Mac.

      Eventually the tide will turn, and while that probably won't happen this year, 2004 is still looking rosy.

      -With the release of a 2nd-generation G5 and an OS X-native version of Quark that will suck slightly less than 6.0, Power Mac sales to print shops and other OS 9 holdovers will surge this year as they replace aging hardware and migrate to Mac OS X.

      -We should see 3.0GHz Power Macs this summer, and Apple will spend much of this year shoehorning the G5 into the PowerBook line. The current Power Macs pretty much already have parity with the fastest x86 stuff, but most people are idiots and still only focus on the GHz-- so 3.0GHz will quiet them a little.

      -Windows has stagnated. Longhorn won't be around for years, and I this time don't think people will fall for the "Second Edition" crap like they did with Windows 98. By the time Longhorn appears there will be another iteration or two of OS X, with lots of whiz-bang features and practically zero security concerns. People will start looking, and some will start buying.

    2. Re:Apple's Future by Vodak · · Score: 1

      In your zest to show the flaws in the Microsoft Windows world and the future domination of Apple you forget one important thing. There is a vast market of people are used to paying lower amounts for Wintel machines. Until Apple makes the ultra cheap machines your Apple world will never happen.

    3. Re:Apple's Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said, *some* will start buying. So I did take into account the excessively cheap people who would rather pay less for mediocrity, no matter how much better the slightly more expensive alternative is.

      But I've got news for you-- IDC reported that in November, the top-selling MP3 player was NOT the cheapest one (they don't have December data available yet):

      -----
      Top Selling Portable Music Players, November 2003
      1. 10GB iPod ($299)
      2. 128MB Digitalway ($140)
      3. 20GB iPod ($399)
      4. 128MB iRiver ($119.99-$139.99)
      5. 40GB iPod ($499)
      -----

      So perhaps some people are starting to figure out that you get what you pay for.

    4. Re:Apple's Future by Vodak · · Score: 1

      iPOD =! Personal Computer

  76. thoughts by mabu · · Score: 1

    I think we were all surprised that one of these crosslinked pundit proclaimations was actually well thought out. A refreshing change. Still I'd like to comment on some things from the article:

    * There won't be a huge internet-busting data-destroying worm or virus, because virus writers appear to have moved past that stage of simple, wilful destruction. Any of the viruses which appeared in the past year could have wiped hard disks clean once they'd propagated; they didn't. That suggests that, as in real life, where very few primary infections kill their hosts, the writers of "malware" have realised that destructive programs have shorter lives.


    I disagree. And it all depends upon what one considers "destruction". The age of worm/virus destruction, especially in terms of security, commerce and privacy hasn't even begun yet. I still think that worm and virus development is in an infantcy stage. What we've seen thus far are little more than experimental forays into testing propagation techniques and sophmoric cyber protests. The ability to launch an exponentially-propagating set of code across billions of computers is too enticing to not begin to be explored on a more insideous (i.e. "commercial") level.

    Sooner or later, we're going to get hit with something huge. It may not explode in a singular, destructive event like the remedial worms of the past, but it will likely be much more damaging in a less attention-getting manner. Look for the proliferation of worm-based secret proxies and information gathering tools. Look for spammers being the driving force behind the development of this technology, which will then be repurposed for even more nasty political and economic terrorism.


    * There will be more viruses and worms that silently exploit holes in Microsoft Windows for criminal motives - such as passing on credit card details and bank passwords. These are the offspring of virus writers hired by organised crime.


    I agree, as I said before, but I'll go one step further and identify "organized crime" as spammers, who will incubate this new technology which will then be used by terrorists.

    * Legal music downloading stores will arrive properly, spurred by the arrival in Europe in the spring of Apple's iTunes Music Store, which will galvanise people with iPods (of whom there are a lot). Those people have ignored existing online stores because their iPod can't play the Windows Media format used by most operations.

    I'm going to go against the grain on this one. I really do not think, unless the music and media industry fundamentally change from their current soulless, formulaic model of pushing unimaginative crap upon the public, that any of the current music-selling business models will be anything more than a fad. I believe the success of iTunes has more to do with boredom than it does innovation and the public's ever-increasing short attention span is going to nuke this industry, probably as soon as this year.

    * Picture phones will become pervasive; it'll be unusual not to have one.

    Hello? 1960? Are you there? Even now the camera-equipped cell phones are goofy and more annoying than they are practical. I have a hard enough time wanting to answer the phone in person. Hell if I'm going to be sending video at the same time. This will never happen in the next 5+ years, if ever.

    * "PVRs" - which store TV programmes on a hard disk - will become more widely available at lower prices. They will compete head-on with DVD recorders, which have the advantage of permanence but the disadvantage of the cost of the disks. With hard disk capacity doubling for a given price, it'll be hard for DVD recorders to compete.

    Now you're talking. This is going to be THE singular, huge tech goliath that shakes the modern couch-potato world. But its effect will manifest itself differently than what you predict IMO.

    I would qualify this more by saying products like TIVO will be the big, HUGE hit

  77. One point I think is wrong by mpost4 · · Score: 1

    I don't think the USB drives will take off like he is thinking, I think that maybe that the SD cards will become the portable media for the new year and years to come, I truly belive that they cards are the floppy drive replacements of the future. With every one having a PDA, and both palm and MS both supporting the SD card. There is the key (as much as this is not liked here a /.) the backing of MS will push the SD cards into the like light. I have a card reader, and an SD card and some of the people I have to take larger files to have eather general card readders of a SD only card reader. And it sits in the palm when I am not using it.

  78. There are accounts, if you know where to look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On XP, Windows Update, among other services, have their own administrator accounts (presumably random login & password). The click thru EULA all but explicitly says something like this can be used by Microsoft to do whatever they darn well please.

  79. This guy is clueless by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    "Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does"

    This guy is clueless.

    Sure, Windows has a hidden Administrator account. And Mac OS X has a hidden root account. And every Linux/Unix system has a root account.

  80. Cringley's (past) predictions for 2003 by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... can be found here.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  81. flying car by frankmu · · Score: 1

    can i have an ipod cradle in my flying car?

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  82. The advice, at least, I think is right by JonathanF · · Score: 1

    Windows may now be (reasonably) stable and there may be 3rd-party apps to help out with what's missing, but I really do agree with the author when he asks people to get a non-Windows system. Think about it. When you get a new Windows computer these days, you have to:

    - put it behind a software firewall or a router
    - get antivirus software (or else use something besides Outlook/Outlook Express)
    - get 40-something critical updates, including SP1
    - consider anti-spyware and/or pop-up blocking software

    Can you imagine expecting a first-time user to know to do all that?

    I don't think so, and the worst part is that this may mean the customer having to shell out X amount of extra dollars to speak to a PC tech after their system gets compromised by Blaster or they get so many pop-up ads as to render the system unuseable. A $399 PC won't seem so cheap if you end up paying someone at least once for support or can't use your computer during a critical period.

    A Mac is expensive, true, but at least you aren't under serious threat of having an unuseable system just by making a direct connection to the Internet without multiple security programs installed. Even XP SP2 won't get rid of adware and spyware.

    1. Re:The advice, at least, I think is right by silverbax · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how Linux is easier for a novice PC user, or non technical user. There's a ton of attacks on a Linux box, and the vast majority of PC users don't know about THEM either.

    2. Re:The advice, at least, I think is right by JonathanF · · Score: 1

      My post was relating to the Mac, but I do agree with you on Linux: as many strides as it has made, it's not going to help a novice out.

  83. have you ever lived in mexico city or bogota? by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    ...the crime there makes NY City look like a upscale gated subdivision. And guess what? Neoliberal policies are importing Bogota and Mexico City here...

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  84. Kucinich has a serious grudge against corp. power by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    He is a definite contrarian with a dislike for corporate power. This is well acknowledged in the political world. He is a card carrying union member. There are plenty of corporate butt-kissing politicians out there already. How about we get someone who is going to watch OUR back for us, instead of being in the pockets of the corporations?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  85. Re:Kucinich has a serious grudge against corp. pow by Saeger · · Score: 1
    The sad reality is that superficial appearance matters to voters, and I agree with the AC in thinking that Kucinich looks like a mangy rat (even after his debate makeovers). And I'm sure John Kerry will get a lot of "he looks like a Kennedy" votes from women, but not enough to outweigh Dean voters, IMO.

    The weakest looking president I can think of would be Truman, and Kucinich is a couple notches below him. But I do like his views-- which is what is supposed to matter most in an ideal world.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  86. Re:Kucinich has a serious grudge against corp. pow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be great; unfortunately, seeing as how Kucinich has about a snowball's chance in Satan's tight, puckered anus of being elected, it's not gonna happen.

    And thank God too. Because Kucinich's brand of anticorporatism stinks of the same immature unthinkingness so prevalent in the early '90s--you remember, when juvenile morons who considered any compromise tantamount to surrender railed against globalization and free trade in general, and NAFTA in particular, stupidly unaware, mind you, that they were being played for fools behind the scenes by union leaders and D.C.-establishment Democratic party bosses, whose motivations and means, let's face it, are no better than the corporate henchmen they oppose. On top of that, Kucinich is a dogmatic nincompoop who's so assured of his moral and intellectual superiority that he can't seem to help but throw snide remarks in as asides wherever he can (remember the first debate? "Helloooo?" I wanted one of the other candidates to punch him.)

    Not even Howard Dean is as arrogant as he. Also, Dean's supporters at least have the courtesy to bathe every so often, even if they're still ugly and fashion-retarded in their clothes cobbled together from hemp and burlap bags.

    In short, Kucinich is the most obnoxious major Democratic candidate and I would sooner vote for a fuckwad like Lieberman than vote for him. Kerry's my man. Cheers.

  87. They forgot the BIG ONE! by tompoe · · Score: 1

    2004 is the year every musician and artist gets introduced to their very own sub $400 high quality recording studio. That includes their very own high quality DVD recording studio. That includes Creative Commons licenses exploding across the Internet. That includes the RIAA taking one very big DUMP!

    Look for audacity and cinelerra to rise to the killer app level in a few weeks. Now, that changes our lives a lot, doesn't it?

  88. On The Other Hand.... by Steve+B · · Score: 1
    Picture phones will become pervasive; it'll be unusual not to have one.

    However, there is a demand for non-picture phones from people who simply aren't allowed to have a camera at work. Those sorts of jobs ain't burger-flipping, making it likely that somebody will address the demand for a phone with all the hot features execpt a camera.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  89. 'The ubiquity of the iPod' by fondue · · Score: 1

    A 400 hard disk that can only be used to play music is going to become ubiquitous? Riiight.

    --

    Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

  90. Wrong, asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPod can be used as an ordinary, everyday external FireWire hard drive while still holding music and being used to play it. You can install an operating system on the iPod and boot from it (on Macs at least, dunno about x86). Apple is even developing a feature for OS X where you can keep your entire home directory on your iPod, if you want.

    Also, the 10GB iPod, which is only $299 and not $400, was the #1 highest selling portable music player in November, according to IDC. The 20GB was #3, and the 40GB was #5. IDC has not yet released numbers for December, but I highly doubt they'll be much different.

    iPod ubiquity is inevitable, and will only happen faster if Apple really does release "junior" iPods for the cheap bastards of the world.

  91. They are all predictions (mine, akshul) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, I wrote all those (I'm the author, but can't be hassled to create a login).

    1) I'm predicting that spam will lessen by year-end. Perhaps you overlooked this.
    2) Music downloads are nothing at all in the UK, which is my audience. (We're a paper, on paper.) You may have Apple in the US, but the US ain't the world, billy boy.
    3) Why "of course"? If the iPod is the best seller, why wouldn't most provide goods formatted for it?
    4) Do I have to go out on a limb, John Dvorak-style, to make a "prediction"? I thought accuracy counted in this game, plus a bit of insight.
    5) MS has not dumped the Tablet - it's dumped Smart Displays.
    So that makes you, hmm, factually wrong on one and just snarky on the rest. Why, so early in the year?

    Charles

  92. Secret account and password by 19usc2462bH · · Score: 1
    (Did you know there's a secret "administrator" account and password on every machine? You didn't? Every hacker does.)

    Does he mean I can break into any Windows machine I want? I'm not a hacker, so... What's the account and password?

  93. Vannevar and the Picture phone? by midgley · · Score: 1
    I think at present the picture phone falls way below the standard of acuity and convenience that Vannevar Bush postulated when he wrote "As We May Think".

    But it is heading toward it.

    A device that stroes a picture in our personal files whenever we see something that is worth recording could come from a phone, which already has the network and needs the camera and bandwidth, or from our PDAs, or from adding the relevant bits to camreas.

    That suggests convergence to me.

  94. Addresses, games, alarm clock, boot drive. by MacDork · · Score: 1

    It isn't just an MP3 player. I couldn't see spending $180 on a MP3 player alone. I'd rather get a walkman and listen to FM/CDs for 30 bucks. However, on my $400 iPod, I can use it to wake me in the morning, backup important files and boot a copy of OS X Server. Can your $180 MP3 player do that?

  95. Amiga Prediction :) by POds · · Score: 1

    You could soon carry a stripped-down operating system in your pocket to boot any machine to look like yours.

    Thats kinda funny because some people have been talking about doing this with there new Amiga's since the entire OS is only around 50-100M a cheap flash memory stick would make there computer portable.

    I believe it's already been stated you can boot off these as well, which is pretty cool.

    Heres my amiga prediction. AmigaOS4 Shall be released this year, first as a Developer Pre Release CD for those who purchased the early bird Amiga's and then a free copy of the real CD will be released for those with the early bird systems.

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  96. Document and email viruses? by MacDork · · Score: 1

    I don't use the Mac, but I can't imagine that to be true: document and email macro viruses?

    I don't use MS Office, so maybe I'm wrong... Wasn't MS Office for the Mac changed a long time ago to not execute macros automatically. I think you at least get a dialog these days.

    As for the hard to imagine part... I guess Windows will do that to you. I've been using the Mac OS daily for nearly 7 years now, and I've never had a virus infect any of my systems. Viruses simply are not a problem on the Macintosh platform. I personally find it hard to imagine fearing infection just trying to update a system on the first day of use. Seriously, is that just anti-MS propaganda or prudent advice?

    1. Re:Document and email viruses? by prichardson · · Score: 1

      You do indeed get a nice dialog, but in a true MS fashion it takes about 10 seconds longer to understand than it should.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
  97. Re:When it comes to viruses, he gets it but doesn' by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Don't be so confident about the destructiveness of viruses. As recent outbreaks have shown a virus can circle the globe almost instantly and infect the majority of available hosts in minutes.

    A particularly devestating tactic would be to infect a host and hook itself into file system calls. It could begin encrypting the entire drive in the background with a random key. It could transparently decrypt any requested files on-the-fly so the computer would continue to work just fine. Aside from a possible slight slowdown, you wouldn't even notice you were infected and the virus would have plenty of time to encrypt the entire drive.

    So long as you don't power down, the key remains in memory, everything works fine, and the virus continues trying to infect other targets on the internet. Infected computers would remain up and running and attacking for hours or days or even weeks. The instant you reset the computer the key gets wiped from memory and your entire harddrive is unreadable garbage.

    If the virus loses it's network link it goes into kamakazi mode, wipes it's key, and destroys any remaining unencrypted portion of the harddrive as fast as it can. If it detects an attempt to back up the drive, it goes kamazi. If it detects a disinfection attempt, it goes kamazi. And then of course it would have a timer to go kamaki.

    Yes, the infection would self-terminate after a few hours or days, but virtually every infectable machine would be slagged.

    The virus could randomly go "dormant" on say one tenth of one percent of infected computers. It would first "wake up" and start attacking at random time delays after most copies have self destructed. That gives you an installed base of several thousand random machines to re-initiate further waves of infection.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  98. Troll. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Criminality in developed countries has been steadily decreasing according to official and serious statistics for the last few years (look it up yourself, ia am doing quite enough debunking your lies). If shooting don't decrease in the US is because USians are nuts, but aprt from that even in the US criminality is going down no up.

    Poverty has also decreased steadily in all developed countries, the US specially.

    Rich countries do not import poverty, pervert liar. Most people that travel to other countries either to work or looking for assylum stay in the countries closest to were they live (Afghans mainly went to Iran, Kurds to Turkey for example, we are talking millons here, not a few thousend that rich countries would allow) and generally people that can afford to travel are better educated people that make a net contribution to the economy. The whining of some people in rich countries for receiving a few thousend of migrants is frankly disgusting and just reflects some darker agendas which I don't wish to discuss here.

    As for poor migrants, full economic sectors would collapse without the help of foreign low skilled workers. Just look at the south of the US (check who is doing all the gardening, janotorial and construction work) or the agriculutral sectors in France and the UK.

    The US has been receiving poor migrant workers from Latin American countries for generations and at the same time its economy has grown and poverty has been diminished.

    Ditto for the EU: when poor countries join the EU (Spain, Greece, Portugal, Ireland) supposedly people in richer countries were going to get poorer and jobless. Well guess what, it did not happened and all economies growed.

    So no, your "predictions" are based in nonsense and as such have only value as a resource for this rethorical exercise.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  99. Not true... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    What document viruses? OS X does not have VBA support needed for these things to work. You fail to understand just how poor Windows security has become and hoe well off other platforms are actually having learned and applied lessons on security.

    Mac OS X DOES have one big gaping security hole... it's called Microsoft Office. Granted, that's not Apple's fault, but since Office is one of the most purchased apps for the Mac, it's worthy of notice.

    The Mac can propigate Word and Excel macro viruses just as well as Windows can... but not much else. Any attempt to access the hard drive fails when the script starts looking for "c:\". Generally, Macs are carriers but not itself afflicted by the macro viruses.

  100. No, still not true by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Office on the Mac is not as big of a hole because of a few reasons:

    1) Not many people use Outlook on the Mac because they already have Mail.app.

    2) Most of the office macro exploits rely on the VBA stuff I mentioned before to do anything of interest. And because not many people store things in Outlook, there's almost no access to email viruses.

    I have Office and it's not nearly the security hole the Windows version is. Add into the mix the lack of integration into the OS that Office has on OS X and it's not really an issue at all. I can't think of one Word macro virus that will actually run on Office X.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No, still not true by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      My point was that the Mac is still a carrier, whether or not it is affected.

      I've been in a situation where Mac Word would get infected by a macro virus, and the unknowing user would then pass Word files onto their PC using clients, and all hell would break loose.

      Infecting your clients is not a good situation to be in, and is just as much of a concern (if not more so) than having your own machine affected.

  101. Mistaken on viruses by Klatoo55 · · Score: 1

    Destructive viruses won't disappear, but will instead get smarter. Even though a virus too destructive for its own good may not work, there are other ways to be malicious, such as a virus that remains hidden, spreading until a certain date, and then...

    --
    ------- "A true friend stabs you in the front." -Eliot