said that small-pox had been eradicated from Africa, by renaming it monkey-pox.
Or when they say that the people of Africa are dying of a virus, and giving them drugs instead of food.
Frank Plummer, director of research at the WHO laboratory in Canada, stated in his last report on the subject that he was finding the virus in 0% of all SARS cases.
If the virus is not there then theses SARS cases are the result of other causes. In the old days an MD would actually make a diagnosis of each patient's condition in order to offer them the correct treatment for their illness. Nowadays they just tell everyone who comes into their shop with a runny nose that they have the latest virus.
Now, the fact that people are dying does not mean that they are dying of some virus, even if WHO asserts that it must.
If you drink raw sewage you will get ill.
If you starve yourself you will get ill.
If you take toxic chemicals for prolonged periods
of time you will get ill.
If you do not take care of your immune system you will get ill.
If you come into contact with a concentration of a particular virus you will most likely get ill.
If you have 0% of this virus inside your body, and you are ill, then the virus is not the cause.
The measure of this 'virus' in the Canadian victims was 0%. Yes, that is ZERO PERCENT.
When can a virus kill by its very absence?
Answer: When 'experts' say it can.
Re:Are you people idiots?
on
SARS Contained
·
· Score: -1, Troll
The existence of the SARS virus has simply been infered, no researcher can honestly say that he/she has seen it. The PCR test was used - look it up.
With such a vague list of symptoms is it any wonder that people have been labeled with the same disease? I contend that there is more than one cause to death and illness.
Slashdot Mirror
said that small-pox had been eradicated from Africa, by renaming it monkey-pox. Or when they say that the people of Africa are dying of a virus, and giving them drugs instead of food.
Frank Plummer, director of research at the WHO laboratory in Canada, stated in his last report on the subject that he was finding the virus in 0% of all SARS cases.
If the virus is not there then theses SARS cases are the result of other causes. In the old days an MD would actually make a diagnosis of each patient's condition in order to offer them the correct treatment for their illness. Nowadays they just tell everyone who comes into their shop with a runny nose that they have the latest virus.
Now, the fact that people are dying does not mean that they are dying of some virus, even if WHO asserts that it must.
If you drink raw sewage you will get ill.
If you starve yourself you will get ill.
If you take toxic chemicals for prolonged periods of time you will get ill.
If you do not take care of your immune system you will get ill.
If you come into contact with a concentration of a particular virus you will most likely get ill.
If you have 0% of this virus inside your body, and you are ill, then the virus is not the cause.
The measure of this 'virus' in the Canadian victims was 0%. Yes, that is ZERO PERCENT. When can a virus kill by its very absence? Answer: When 'experts' say it can.
The existence of the SARS virus has simply been infered, no researcher can honestly say that he/she has seen it. The PCR test was used - look it up. With such a vague list of symptoms is it any wonder that people have been labeled with the same disease? I contend that there is more than one cause to death and illness.