Slashdot Mirror


SARS Contained

The World Health Organization has declared that SARS is contained, for now. Toronto has engaged in extensive analysis of the outbreak there, leading to a number of interesting and in-depth stories about the progression of the disease.

323 comments

  1. it's about time... by double_plus_ungod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this flu season should be frightening. everyone will think they have the sars when it's just the flu.

    counting down to the next outbreak of some other nasty bug like hantavirus, westnile, or ebola

    1. Re:it's about time... by Arnold_Crenshaw · · Score: 3, Informative

      everyone will think they have the sars when it's just the flu.

      Considering that the flu has a higher mortality rate than SARS, I would be more worried about it.

    2. Re:it's about time... by b-baggins · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should be more terrified of the flu, since the flu kills about a thousand times more people in a year than this stupid SARS virus did. For crying out loud, you had a greater chance of dying by slipping in your bathtub. Even in China.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    3. Re:it's about time... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      since the flu kills about a thousand times more people in a year than this stupid SARS virus did.

      True, but it's the death rate you should be concerned with, not how many people died. The flu kills a thousands more people in a year then SARS because hundreds of millions of people (Billions?) get the flu in a year.

      The death rate for people infected with SARS is much , much higher then the death rate for people infected with the flue.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    4. Re:it's about time... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " For crying out loud, you had a greater chance of dying by slipping in your bathtub. Even in China. "

      I'm not a big fan of reasoning like this. I may have a chance of slipping in the bathtub, but I can also take steps to prevent it. I also know exactly when and where it can happen so I can be on my guard. In the case of infection, I don't know when somebody else has it. That's what's truely scary about it.

      Your heart's in the right place, but the "worry over greater risks" reasoning could use some tuning. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:it's about time... by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2, Informative

      that's a myth. There is something like a 10% chance of dying from SARS, and most people who come down with it are hospitalized.

      --
      Jeremy
    6. Re:it's about time... by jsse · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This SARS is not a stupid virus as you might think. Here are the facts about the virus that really worried the experts:

      1) Regardless of what the press said, the method of spreading is still UNKNOWN
      2) Different regions revealed different format of the virus itself. Its true(or original) form is still UNKNOWN
      3) Some believed that the original infestion started by the contact of wild animal with human like it did for AIDS. However, experts later found that multiple generations of SARS were found in one region and even one host at the same time! It's rather different from AIDS. Thus, the origin of the virus is UNKNOWN

      Disclaimer: I live in Hong Kong - the city which has the major outbreak of SARS.

    7. Re:it's about time... by rocjoe71 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...The death rate for SARS has been standing at around 10% since March. The fact is even when it was reported as being "out of control" in several places around the world it still wasn't spreading as virulently as influenza does every year-- or cholera-- or malaria...

      --
      Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    8. Re:it's about time... by dtake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, but it's the death rate you should be concerned with, not how many people died. The flu kills a thousands more people in a year then SARS because hundreds of millions of people (Billions?) get the flu in a year.

      The death rate for people infected with SARS is much , much higher then the death rate for people infected with the flue.

      True, but compared with something like yellow fever, which afflicts 200,000 every year and kills 30,000, SARS affects many fewer people AND has a lower mortality rate. But I don't see any headlines about yellow fever and no mad rush to find a cure.

      And I wouldn't rule out a disease as a problem just because of a lower mortality rate. The very fact that 1.9 million children die of diarrheal diseases every year, 1 million people die of malaria every year, and 2 million die of tuberculosis every year means that they are more serious health problems than SARS. The fact that the mortality rate can be low for these diseases with proper care is irrelevant. In the real world these are the killers, not SARS.

      For more information on the diseases we still really need to worry about, check out the WHO Infectious diseases site

    9. Re:it's about time... by Dr+Tall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I may have a chance of slipping in the bathtub, but I can also take steps to prevent it. Especially since slipping in your bathtub is usually your own fault. Running into a person with SARS usually is not. Things which can harm you without personal error tend to frighten me more.

    10. Re:it's about time... by grolschie · · Score: 5, Informative

      I spent one day in Hong Kong recently. What I noticed was that the only people wearing masks, seemed to be shop assistants and some airport security. I guess that is to make the partrons feel better. I guess the every people in Hong Kong are not so worried these days. Would that be fair to say?

    11. Re:it's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop eating monkeys and dogs, damn it!

    12. Re:it's about time... by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The trick with SARS was that the nature of the disease and its method of transmission were basically unknown. Looking back now, it may not seem that big a deal, but when the medicos shrug their shoulders, and the doctors start becoming victims, that makes it a scary story...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    13. Re:it's about time... by jsse · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess the every people in Hong Kong are not so worried these days. Would that be fair to say?

      Very true. Although there are lots of uncertainty about SARS but after the disaster we've confidence in facing it again.

      The high casualty is due to the infficiency of our local Government and their lack of risk awareness(which anger a lot of people and triggered a mass protest of the centaury). Fortunately for us we've a lot of brave people who are willingly to risk their live to take the most dangerous and dirty job and nobody(but the governer) retreat. We're really proud of them.

    14. Re:it's about time... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      1) Regardless of what the press said, the method of spreading is still UNKNOWN

      It's a coranavirus, spread by sputum and other bodily fluids. No magic, just a tough virus that has to be treated with respect.

      Disclaimer: I live in Hong Kong - the city which has the major outbreak of SARS.

      So do I.

    15. Re:it's about time... by jsse · · Score: 1

      Stop eating monkeys and dogs, damn it!

      In Hong Kong we don't. Local Laws here prohibits this kind of activities.

      But some other place very near to us do....fortunately, in order to fight SARS, they recently passed similar laws to forbid people from killing wild and domestic animals for meal. (yeah :)

    16. Re:it's about time... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      I guess the every people in Hong Kong are not so worried these days. Would that be fair to say?

      Since there hasn't been any new cases reported for over 20 days, and the incubation period is 10 days, it's been declared safe.

    17. Re:it's about time... by jsse · · Score: 1

      spread by sputum and other bodily fluids. No magic

      Hi there.

      Even some experts in University of Hong Kong believe that there are multiple ways of spreading the disease, and that include airborne. You still remember the panic when the unusal outbreak in Amoy Garden? My friend who worked in related research told me it's rather unusal that the disease were spreading so fast, with spray like spreading method has you described. The Government only chose what they want you to believe.

    18. Re:it's about time... by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Even some experts in University of Hong Kong believe that there are multiple ways of spreading the disease, and that include airborne.

      Yes, airborne -- sputum, or in Amoy Gardens, from the guy who had diarrhoea and then via the criminally stupid sewage/drainage system there that allowed it to flow back through the drains.

      The Government only chose what they want you to believe.

      The WHO is subject to political pressure (as when they refused to even talk to Taiwan), but they had a pretty free hand here (as opposed to the Mainland where they tried to hush it up for months).

    19. Re:it's about time... by Jonavin · · Score: 3, Funny

      That 10% death rate is inflated. First of all, most of the people that got it was already in the hospital for one reason or another. They count it as a SARS death if there's 1% chance that it was due to SARS.

      I live in Toronto, and some think SARS is great. That's right, cheap theatre tickets, low hotel rates, no waiting for a table at your favourate restaurant. Easy to find parking, and there's always the obligatory "SARS discounts". To quote , "WE LOVE SARS!".

      But seriously, no offence to the people who have really sufferred from this sickness, but this thing is over-hyped. If you just watched CNN, you'd think everybody in Toronto was getting it left and right. And where the heck do they find all those people with SARS masks? I've been all over Toronto in the past few months and haven't seen one single person wear a mask except on TV (pictures of hospital workers).

    20. Re:it's about time... by Jotham · · Score: 3, Interesting
      this flu season should be frightening. everyone will think they have the sars when it's just the flu.

      Good, medical centres are now very effective at testing for it. I'm sick (no-pun intended) of people coughing and sniffling at work when they should be at home with companies encouraging this as proper behaviour. Maybe a few will take things a bit more seriously.

      Nah, what am I saying, the outbreak is over and besides I can't take a day off - my reports needs to be done!

    21. Re:it's about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... eating animals like dogs are uncivilized, says the white man. It must be true.

    22. Re:it's about time... by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I had a nasty cough for 5 weeks and didn't take a day off school or work. Pretty recently, too, when other universities were sending students home for much lesser symptoms. From the first week on, people among the university staff kept saying I should really see a doctor, as the coughs sounded worse than anything they said they'd heard. It probably lasted so long because I was pulling a lot of all-nighters at the time finishing reports, which probably weakened my immune system. Looking back at it, I probably spread it to hundreds of people by not staying home those 5 weeks, but it's too late to change now, and I would have had to retake all the classes I had that term if I did. I did see a doctor about it after the 2nd week. She was pretty scared by it, wore a mask and gloves, wouldn't get within 5 feet of me, and prescribed a bunch of expensive medications to take. She diagnosed it as acute bronchitis. Even with the medication, it took 3 weeks to for it to get better. It was probably a virus because the antibiotics seemed to have little effect.

      Getting back on topic, I was near Los Angeles on vacation this morning (I'm in Oregon now) and read in the newspaper that a resident was quarantined with SARS like symptoms.

    23. Re:it's about time... by dtake · · Score: 1

      1) Regardless of what the press said, the method of spreading is still UNKNOWN

      A good point, to which I may add that there is currently no treatment proven effective in treating SARS, nor do I expect to see one anytime soon. But despite these facts, by only using public health measures and unproven treatments the outbreak was contained, suggesting that SARS is no superbug either.

      2) Different regions revealed different format of the virus itself. Its true(or original) form is still UNKNOWN

      Also true, but pretty much par for the course in viral diseases. We don't know the original influenza virus or hepatitis virus either. The sad truth of the matter is that most viruses mutate very rapidly, so much so that in the course of a long-term viral infection such as HIV the strains you will see in a given patient will change over time.

    24. Re:it's about time... by h2odragon · · Score: 1
      They're very reluctant to diagnose viral bronchitis, they'd much rather you suck up codiene and antibiotics for a few months first before considering it. or a few years.

      One of the few diseases that can be cured by smoking tobacco, and they wont tell you that, either. "stay sick, i have a payment coming up on the Porsche"

    25. Re:it's about time... by plumby · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Proper risk management takes into account both the effect if an incident happens, and the likelihood of it happening. Being hit by an asteriod would probably be close to 100% fatal, but as it doesn't happen very often it's not a major concern. However, if the common cold had a 0.1% fatality rate, then I'd be very concerned, as I, like most people I know, get a cold at least once per year.

      A 1 in 10 chance of dying from something that you've got a 1 in many many millions chance of catching in the first place is just does not seem as frightening as the media made out.

    26. Re:it's about time... by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't see any headlines about Yellow Fever for one reason:

      Whitey doesn't get it.

      There, I said it. SARS cases first showed up last November in China and Asia, but it wasn't until cases showed up in Toronto in March that it got into the mainstream Western news media. Yellow fever, TB, even ebola and hanta virus are not a problem for the western world. Ebola and Hanta are horrible.. but they kill so quickly that they can't really spread and most of the people with TB around the world live in poverty, so aren't visiting Toronto on a regular basis.

    27. Re:it's about time... by Firehawk · · Score: 1

      It's the mode of transmission too. Doctors and nurses wearing protective equipment were getting SARS at one point. SARS is spread through fine droplets and maybe aerosols.

      Yellow fever, on the other hand, requires mosquitoes.

      You can get SARS by sitting next to someone with SARS on the subway in New York.

      On the other hand, unless New York becomes warm enough to attract mosquitoes, you should be relatively safe from yellow fever there.

      Even for something like tuberculosis, which is transmitted by droplets, the infectivity is far lower than SARS. Ask any doctor who knows something about SARS.

    28. Re:it's about time... by Jungle+guy · · Score: 1
      That 10% death rate is inflated. First of all, most of the people that got it was already in the hospital for one reason or another.

      Those people were in a hospital because they were doctors and nurses, and were perfectly healthy before contracting SARS. The physician who discovered the disease died from SARS. If the WHO had not been careful, thousands of smart-asses would be saying now "the Canadian government should have given more attention to it when the outbreak was confined to one city".

    29. Re:it's about time... by dtake · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get SARS by sitting next to someone with SARS on the subway in New York.

      On the other hand, unless New York becomes warm enough to attract mosquitoes, you should be relatively safe from yellow fever there.

      So a disease is only newsworthy if it potentially afflicts New Yorkers. Wow.

      Even for something like tuberculosis, which is transmitted by droplets, the infectivity is far lower than SARS. Ask any doctor who knows something about SARS.

      "Far lower" is an overstatement. The infectivity of SARS is by no means high. If it were, there would have been at least hundreds of thousands of cases once it broke out to a densely populated city with many travellers such as Hong Kong. In the case of a truly highly infectious disease such as influenza, there are tens of millions of cases every year despite the presence of an effective vaccine, global surveilliance, and partially effective treatment options.

    30. Re:it's about time... by danny256 · · Score: 1

      You said you are from Hong Kong, let me just point something out. I assume english is not your first language and I notice that you made a grammer mistake that a lot of Chinese people make.

      Fortunately for us we've a lot of brave people

      I know contractions think must think like the greatest thing in the world, but in this case, you want to say "we have", not "we've". I'm not sure what the specific rule is about that, but the way you wrote it is wrong. All I can say is that using a contraction in that case just dosn't sound right. You should try to read a lot of english books to help you understand the subtleties of the english language. Just for reference "We're really proud of them" on the last line is ok.

    31. Re:it's about time... by thejames · · Score: 1

      I've found that the media hype for SARS was absolutely ridiculous. I *knew* that SARS had been contained to nearly one hospital, but then again, when the story of a nurse with SARS symptoms had been spotted on a train, I couldn't help but wonder if she had been at my workplace.

      Since I'm in book sales, we get any and all types... the next night, sure enough, I started to get pretty warm and achy. Like a good Citizen I quarantined myself, lost tons of pay, worried my co-workers at both of my jobs for naught. No SARS.

      When I think back on this, I'm almost positive that the symptoms were partially psychologically induced. I might've had something, but it sure wasn't SARS.

      In this day and age where we're all worried about government conspiracies and trying to fight the man (or Microsoft), we should add "Media Hype & Sensationalism" to that list. If "SARS" had been named something else, something less ominous sounding, we sure wouldn't have seen the coverage that we did. There are courses in high school and university that cover this, but perhaps something more mainstream like a public-funded initiative at awareness.

      Even now with the "outbreak contained", I'm worried about crossing the border and telling them I'm from Toronto.

    32. Re:it's about time... by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Is that you, Terano? :-P

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    33. Re:it's about time... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Note that there is a significant difference between a disease being CONTAINED versus being CURED. To my knowledge, there is no known *cure* for SARS.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  2. You're kidding right by lakeland · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sars can be seen in just about any supermarket in the country now... See for example http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet .com/english/2003-05/21/content_879849.htm

    1. Re:You're kidding right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sars can be seen in just about any supermarket in the country now... See for example,
      this.

  3. Celebrations In TO by LordoftheFrings · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live near Toronto, and there were celebrations all day today, and today was the first day that Canada's Wonderland was filled to near capacity. Holding a seasons pass this year, my delight at seeing SARS gone is kind of put off by the longer lines at the theme park. Don't get me wrong, it is a great thing, but... a two minute line up to get on Drop Zone is a tough thing to give up.

    1. Re:Celebrations In TO by Boo+Robin · · Score: 1

      I live in Toronto, and my sister is a health care worker and lives with me. Amazingly, I have not come down with SARS. Many people I have talked to that are from other regions of the world, mainly America, believe that SARS is widespread in Toronto. Like chicken pox or something. Really makes you think how stupid some people can be.

      I have yet to go to Wonderland; I should go before I leave for Greece. :D

      -Boo

      --
      'Give me one more medicated peaceful moment'
    2. Re:Celebrations In TO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i went to the zoo last week with some friends that were in town. it was pretty dead. sometimes wed go 20 minutes without seeing anyone.

    3. Re:Celebrations In TO by reidbold · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, Toronto has also been blessed with SARS Fest, $20 to see the stones, AC/DC, Guess Who, Rush, and dozens of other bands. Plus I saw the Dears today at SARS Square, aka Yonge-Dundas. It's a good time to be a music fan in Toronto.

      --
      -Reid
    4. Re:Celebrations In TO by Jonavin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's all CNN's fault. All this hype and hysteria.

      At one point Larry King wanted to interview local talk-show host Mike Bullard about SARS. After the pre-interview (i.e. screening process), they decided not to do the interview afterall. The reason? Mike didn't want to tell them the story the way CNN wants to hear it... that everyone in Toronto is getting SARS and that everybody is scared silly.

      The truth is, I don't even know a FOAF (friend of a friend) that has SARS. I have not seen anyone wear a mask in public. So how come, every tiem I turned on CNN, there are pitures of people in Toronto wearing asks. Where are they finding these people.

      God I hate the media.

    5. Re:Celebrations In TO by kisak · · Score: 1
      We all like to point out the faults of the media, but maybe Toronto should think a bit about their own behaviour in this. Toronto citizens got very upset to be put on the WHO travel warning list in April, and Canadian politicians put immense pressure on WHO to be taken of the list because "it hurts tourism". A week later Toronto is of the list to "everyones relief", but then SARS breaks out again since it was not actually contained in the first incident! This is quite shocking when dealing with a disease we definitely don't want to spread around the world (imagine the horror of SARS in poor parts of Africa...). Canada is a country with a health care system that can contain SARS properly, if it keeps its eyes on the ball.

      Maybe you should care more about actually doing your job in containing the disease than worrying about public relationships and news coverage? If you had contained the virus in the first outbreak, the bad PR would have been much less than the image of Toronto these days among travellers. More info here from the bad, bad media about Toronto and SARS.

      --

      --- guns don't kill people, people with guns kill people ---

    6. Re:Celebrations In TO by DJTodd242 · · Score: 1

      For the record, I did see a number of people wearing SARS masks. Usually I'd notice them on the subway on my communte into work. Nearly all of them were Asian. However, it was only for about 2 weeks during the initial hysteria.

    7. Re:Celebrations In TO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken by someone who clearly hasn't lost his or her job because of a mistaken decision made by a foreign organization.

    8. Re:Celebrations In TO by Lokist · · Score: 1

      I live in Toronto... You mostly saw people in the subways where there is poor ventilaton wearing masks... Down on bloor station at 5pm can be a very busy place.

  4. Translation by BabelFishes... by igabe · · Score: 1

    So what your saying is that with subscriptions we can see the future?

    Oh, and that plums provide the good karma necessary for accurate fortune telling.

    Yes, therefore SARS is not yet contained.

    --
    tilTrue.info contechtext.info prettypowerful.info twitter.com/frets fb.com/prosody
    1. Re:Translation by BabelFishes... by igabe · · Score: 1

      The post I attached this too was modded to -1 offtopic and apparently removed, so just ignore what I wrote in the above thread.

      Whatever you do, don't ruin my good karma! :-o

      --
      tilTrue.info contechtext.info prettypowerful.info twitter.com/frets fb.com/prosody
    2. Re:Translation by BabelFishes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw that original BabelFishes post. I thought slashdot had a policy of not removing messages?

    3. Re:Translation by BabelFishes... by Doomrat · · Score: 0

      Hit the parent link you FOOLS.

    4. Re:Translation by BabelFishes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not the post he replied to. There was another post that talked about babelfishes and some weird german things.

  5. One down... by craenor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A million more to go. Until people, health officials and governments take outbreaks of this nature more seriously. We'll always be in danger from them. In a time when people couldn't just span the globe in a matter of hours, diseases like the flu still managed to kill 25 million people.

    Nowadays we are tied together by a lattice work of airlines and freedom of worldwide travel that make us so much more at risk. Of course, where do you draw the line? We need some serious concern, not worldwide paranoia.

    I'm not saying SARS was badly handled everywhere. I'm just saying that there may very well come a time in the future where another event starts just like one...but the ending will be much worse.

    1. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
      Right-clicking a dos executable in WinXP lets you set memory settings(extended/expanded)great for old games.

      gnarly, man

    2. Re:One down... by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It was hardly an outbreak. How many people in the states died of it?

      Of course, a disease isn't serious until it affects Americans.

    3. Re:One down... by FeTrut · · Score: 1

      Parent is insightful? Maybe it should Troll, for glibly suggesting that a widespread rampant virus killing millions of people would be a good thing, nevermind the US-centric view that if it didn't affect people in America, it's not worth worrying about. Or hell, maybe i misunderstood, maybe it ought to be Funny...but insightful?

    4. Re:One down... by gmajor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what makes the Chinese so special that they are not immune to SARS? There were plenty of other nationalities affected, but the countries they lived in took proper precautions. One speculation is that this had more to do with those countries being democracies (But to its credit, Vietnam also managed to contain SARS to a certain extent).

      And didn't SARS begin in the Guangdong province? Hardly the center of overpopulation.

      Why didn't Japan get hard? They were right next to China and only had 1 or 2 cases! Tokyo is one of the most dense cities in the world. And what to say about Mexico City? Bombay? All unaffected by SARS.

    5. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An arrogant American? Who would have thought?

    6. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right, so sars is a political problem now?
      In case you haven't noticed, Canada, a democracy, was the second hardest hit by Sars. Propagation of such a disease as alot more to do with bad luck and coincidences than politics. Granted propagation is somewhat influanced by demographics, but if you follow through the initial spread, I'm refering mainly to the hotel outbreak, considering those 60something who were infected at that time (and being in an hotel isn't something that's related to overpopulation), I think China did a pretty good job. I don't know that even the US might have done better.

    7. Re:One down... by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Of course, isolation is a two-edged sword. It gives us protection from more dangerous diseases, but it also allows mutations that are sufficiently unique to form without immunity to go along with it. The flu is a perfect exmple. For the last 20 or 30 years, scientists have been predicting another major outbreak, in epidemic proportions. But it just doesn't happen, and they keep saying "real soon, now".

      Sometimes, I question that. Maybe the reason we don't see them any more is that we aren't isolated for very many generations from any particular strain of the flu, and so it never has a chance to gain a large advantage over our immune systems. Hence, no epidemics.

      I'm not saying this is a fact, but if you look at most of the epidemics we have nowadays, they fall into the following categories:
      • New diseases (for people at least), which almost no one has immunity to (AIDS, SARS).
      • Older diseases which are fairly virulent, but never seem to spread beyond their locale (ebola, dangerous e. coli variants).
      • Variants of older diseases which are more virulent, but still are fairly benign (west nile). I question calling a disease epidemic when it only kills tens out of millions of the local population, but they labelled it...
      • Superbugs, which have mutated to have anti-biotic resistance (staph, etc.)


      Given my residence in North America, I'm not too worried about ebola, and it's class of diseases as described above. It's very hit-and-miss, and rarely spreads outside of it's initial range. This may be due to infection vectors or other things, but they never seem to really take over in general (thankfully).

      I'm also not too worried about West Nile, and others like it. Let's be realistic - if you're not very old, very young, or immune-compromised, your odds of catching it and dying (or even knowing) are lower than being struck by lightning.

      Superbugs and the new diseases that we have no immunity are a lot more worrisome. These are having the greatest impact worldwide, and have no simple cures. I'm aware that developing nations suffer a lot more deaths than either of these causes from very well-known diseases, but they are easily preventable through proper hygiene and such - that's why they disappeared in most industrialized countries.

      So, flus and such don't even get on my list. As long as we keep getting our regular exposures to the worldwide variants (and exporting ours ;), the risks of the population in general being introduced to a variant that is unrecognizable to our immune systems should be lower, in a way making the world a safer place, hopefully.
      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:One down... by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      well, when it's only affecting third world nations with pathetic health infastructures, and the Americans that get it have almost 0 deaths, then, yeah, I'll consider it not an epidemic

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    9. Re:One down... by lightsaber1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when are Canada and China third world nations?

    10. Re:One down... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Since when are Canada and China third world nations?

      Well , most of China is Third World. But Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong all have better public health systems than the US (for those who can't afford health insurance).

    11. Re:One down... by The+Matrix+Has+Me · · Score: 1
      I question calling a disease epidemic when it only kills tens out of millions of the local population, but they labelled it

      "Epidemic" is a statistical term. It means that there are at least a certain percentage more cases than normal. It has nothing to do with the ratio of infected persons to the population in general

    12. Re:One down... by anotherdotter · · Score: 1
      I'm also not too worried about West Nile, and others like it. Let's be realistic - if you're not very old, very young, or immune-compromised, your odds of catching it and dying (or even knowing) are lower than being struck by lightning.

      What kind of insensitive comment is that? Just so I understand you, if I'm old then it's ok to be worried, right? Let's see how worried you'd be if your very young child got it.

      Given that West Nile kills other species too, and it's potential to cause havoc, I'd say it's worth worrying at least a little about it. For more info on West Nile I found this informative.

    13. Re:One down... by hey · · Score: 1

      I heard (just a rumor) that the USA was calling their cases "Pneumonia III" to avoid the stigma associated with SARS.

    14. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why didn't Japan get hard?

      I dunno... not enough scat, bondage and bukkake?

    15. Re:One down... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Not insensitive, just sick of the hype. The average person in the US is 100 times likelier to die of the flu, yet they go on like this is the Black Death. I'm more interested in improving road safety awareness - you'll see better returns than you will with West Nile. Actually, I take that back - raising awareness of the importance of using DEET for at-risk groups is valuable. And I do have 3 very young children, and I live in an area that has tested positive for West Nile for the last two summers. They're still likelier to die in a car accident.

      I am also aware that West Nile is of great risk to birds of the crow family (which is mentioned by the media as an indicator of risk, not an ecological issue), and to horses, which barely gets media attention in my area. I've never seen the media mention any other species at risk.

      The issue I had is the parent of my previous reply worrying about SARS taking away from the attention given to West Nile, and my response being that you don't really have much to worry about unless you fall into an at-risk category. Even if you do, those categories are the same as for the flu, which is a greater risk.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    16. Re:One down... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      You're much more likely to die of influenza than
      SARS, at the moment, but if SARS were uncontained,
      you would soon be vastly more likely to die of
      SARS than any other infectious disease. Until June,
      a SARS global pandemic remained a very real threat.
      Heck, even now it remains a very real threat: Do
      you really think that rural China is SARS-free,
      after the mass exodus from Beijing at the height
      of the epidemic there?

      The CCP saw that they were getting ripped over
      SARS when it leaked out into Vietnam, HK, and
      Toronto, so they started giving out real numbers.
      If you chart the noise in those numbers, you will
      see that suddenly at the end of May, it disappeared.
      In my opinion, they decided that the real and present
      economic damage of the ongoing epidemic was
      worse than the bad rap from supressing the news,
      so they started feeding the WHO phony numbers
      at the beginning of June.

      By the end of June, China is SARS-free. But
      if you get a dry, persistent cough and fever
      in Xi'an, I'd bet dollars to donuts that you
      will suddenly "disappear". They really don't
      care if 90% of the Chinese people die -- that
      would just put the family planning bureau ahead
      of its goals. All they care about is making sure
      that SARS does not contaminate tourists or escape
      the borders.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    17. Re:One down... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I heard (just a rumor) that the USA was calling their cases "Pneumonia III" to avoid the stigma associated with SARS.

      Well, it was pretty damn annoying that this "SARS" acronym was used, considering that Hong Kong is offically the "Hong Kong SAR" (Special Administrative Region). That really welded it in people's minds that it was a Hong Kong disease. So I (living in HK) am happy if they can use a name that doesn't imply that.

    18. Re:One down... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      If you read my comment two levels up, I class SARS and AIDS on the same level - new diseases with little or no immunity in the general population. Fortunately, excellent hygiene reduces your risks with SARS (and certain lifestyle choices reduce your risk of AIDS - and I'm not saying heterosexuality!), and it is survivable. That said, I would have been leery of going to TO in May or June.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    19. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.. this is the reason for the hysteria surrounding SARS. Ebola and Malaria are far more verocious killers, but since nobody in the western world has a serious chance of getting it, no hysteria is created and no cure is developed post haste. The fact that it is a flu, and that the majority of people in the west get the flu every year makes it good hysteria fodder.

    20. Re:One down... by RALE007 · · Score: 1
      Americans aren't arrogant! You must be a stupid foriegner to say that!


      Oops, I think I just proved Americans can be ignorant too.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    21. Re:One down... by Greedo · · Score: 1

      I can't find confirmation of this, but I heard that there is basically a media blackout on SARS cases in the States.

      Apparently, there was a news report in California about 64 cases of SARS in the state. The next day, a "correction" was printed, that it was actually 4 cases, and it wasn't SARS at all. After that, no more follow-up articles.

      I find it incredibly difficult to believe that there wasn't a single case of SARS in the States, what with it's large population and image of being a destination of choice for travellers, immigrants and refuges. I find it much more likely that there was a directive from on high at some point to not report anything about it for fear of devastating the US's already sagging economy.

      Maybe an American here can enlighten us.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    22. Re:One down... by hey · · Score: 1

      Maybe time to rename it the Administrative Industrial Divisional Sector. ;-)

    23. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      & rightly so you brown third world piece of feces stuck on the bottom of my shoe.

    24. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China always has been. will always be for the foreseeable future. and Canadians don't count;)

    25. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That third worlders come into the US with SARS and die here doesn't count.

    26. Re:One down... by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Here's one link to a report.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    27. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same thing goes for BSE (the beef brain wasting disease). The US has almost certainly covered up their incidents of this disease. Canada had a single case that they were unable to pinpoint on any Canadian source, and now it appears that the BSE infection ,came in from the United States beef industry, which is (was) intricately tied to the Canadian industry. Do you hear anything about this in the US media though? Hell no, that would involve Americans admitting to something which might cost them money.

    28. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A Canadian discovered insulin, (I hope you don't get type2 diabetes), and everybody knows an American invented electronic communication..A.G.Bell, and everybody knows the come to the party late Americans lost fewer people in the First World War than Canada did, with one tenth the population.
      and every American knows that the North American FTA is unfair to Americans,(unless you are a lumberman).


      The mad cow ( one poor old heffer) got her disease from an American farm. Even though our Canadian inspection system discovered the disease, and very quickly acted. Canadian beef is still banned!


      We reacted quickly and appropriately to sars, Americans just knee jurked, and spouted off.


      Americans shit on Canadians because we have a greater sense of compassion for the oppressed.
      Good I will remain a Canadian and live within a more liberated, human, and compassionate society.

    29. Re:One down... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I'm also not too worried about West Nile, and others like it. Let's be realistic - if you're not very old, very young, or immune-compromised, your odds of catching it and dying (or even knowing) are lower than being struck by lightning.

      I had a moderately severe case of West Nile last year, complete with meningitis, and I fall into none of the above categories.

      The risk is small, but not nearly as small as you make it out to be.

      Also, mosquitoes, even in the First World, carry a lot of nasty diseases, not just West Nile, that you are best off avoiding. And it's not hard to do. Just wear mosquito repellant when outdoors.

    30. Re:One down... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you say, with the exception of how small the risk is. For simplicity's sake, let's say there were 6000 diagnosed cases in 2002, that's more than recorded. 6000/300M = 0.002%. I'm likelier to die of exposure where I live, and there are only (only! ;) 5 months of winter here. Besides, as you said yourself, if I wear repellent, my risks are lower. And I'm still 100 times likelier to die of the flu, and I don't worry about that too much either - more for my kids than myself.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  6. But is it too late, now that ... by Professor+D · · Score: 5, Funny

    The civet's out of the bag?

    1. Re:But is it too late, now that ... by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      i bet it was a male who contracted SARS first. Look at that thing. Females would have gone "oh they are so cuteeee!" and stayed away.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  7. This proves to exemplify ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic.

    Josef Stalin

    1. Re:This proves to exemplify ... by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

      And 800 deaths is considered to be an epidemic.

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
  8. Contained? by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How can they say they have the disease contained if they say, in their next breath, that they expect it to come back again?

    --
    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    1. Re:Contained? by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      "How can they say they have the disease contained if they say, in their next breath, that they expect it to come back again?"

      A year after his escape, Houdini has finally been re-captured. The world is now safe from his antics. We should caution you, though, that he may find a way to escape again. Afterall, it would be immoral to execute him.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Contained? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I too would question such an asessment, given the lengths that the Chinese govmt tried to cover it up, and the lengths that the US and Canadian goverments are suspected of underestimating or trying to curtail knowledge of how widely spread it was.

    3. Re:Contained? by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      Overtated? Aww c'mon, I was trying to answer the guy's question. I was saying that the term 'contained' works because we can't execute everybody who shows signs of SARS. Even if we could do that, it's hard to imagine that it couldn't reappear again at some point.

      There are some people with mod points that I wish would just discuss instead of mod.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Contained? by noone06 · · Score: 1

      How widely spread it was? I work in a hospital in Toronto, and I was never afraid of catching SARS. It was always well contained, here anyways.

    5. Re:Contained? by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How can they say they have the disease contained if they say, in their next breath, that they expect it to come back again?

      It's easy. The disease is contained (probably) in the human population. We know (probably) who all the infected individuals are, and they are being treated with appropriate precautions.

      SARS, however, is not a disease limited to humans. The original hosts are thought to be animals. Candidates include several mammalian species, as well as a number of birds. Right now, dozens of different species are being exposed to the SARS virus in labs on several continents, in an attempt to determine which animals may act as a reservoir for the virus.

      So, SARS is contained--but there is the potential for future outbreaks as long as the virus still exists in animal populations. Similarly, Ebola is usually readily contained when there is a human outbreak, but it keeps coming back because wild primates act as a natural reservoir.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:Contained? by L1Trauma · · Score: 1

      Simply, Contained > Eradicated. The only disease ever thought to have been eradicated by man is Smallpox. Even so, I still get letters asking me to take the vaccine, since I am a "front line" physician. Yay!

    7. Re:Contained? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you're just begging for an Offtopic...

    8. Re:Contained? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Well, it'd eradicated in the wild, but it's in various storage facilities...

    9. Re:Contained? by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      Curtail it so idiots like you wouldn't run around screaming that the sky was falling.

      --
      - Toby
  9. "SARS Contained" by terrab0t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like that. "SARS Contained". It has a nice ring to it.

    Now, could we have this plastered all over your fear mongering channel? I believe you call it CNN.

    1. Re:"SARS Contained" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nono - you mispelled "fox news"

  10. Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Alystair · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ehem, sorry, couldn't resist it... damn those Southpark kids!

    1. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya its never the USA's fault. its always someone else. for sars, go blame japan

    2. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a well known fact that the us military is secretly aresting people with sars and sending them to cuba. mad cow also came from a USA cow and west nile came from there too. The canadian dollar was rising too fast for someone....

    3. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a fucking joke. Laugh. God damn Canadians.

    4. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by tyrani · · Score: 1

      You can blame us when you can identify either where Alberta is without the aid of a map or know the name of our Prime Minister.

      At least you can't blame us for being stupid.

      +1 Flaimbit...I know, I know.

      --
      rejected (19) accepted (0)
      Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
    5. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree. It was a joke. I laughed. But at the same time people are dying and you want to blame us? Well, even if it is a joke, someone is going to take offence to it.

      I can make a "black" racist joke and it may be funny to my Grandfather who doesn't understand social concequence, but it sure wouldn't be funny to any Afro-Americans.

    6. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Alystair · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian... I liked Southpark and their antics. Urhm... happy belated Canada day.

    7. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you understand that song was written by Canadians (the creaters of south park are from Canada), and the whole movie was basically making fun of how ignorant people in the US are.

    8. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not rising as fast as my pants!

    9. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by aoeuid · · Score: 1

      I read on cbc.ca a few days ago that Canada has dropped to 8th place on the UN list.

    10. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can blame us when you can identify either where Alberta is without the aid of a map

      Easy! I'll start driving north and once I get close to the border, I'll roll down my window and follow the stench.

    11. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make sure you leave your pigeons behind and don't bring them to Climax, Saskatchewan.

    12. Re:Blame Canada, blame Canada... *sings* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the creators of south park are not from Canada. They are from Colorado. Which is why South Park is set in Colorado

  11. Re:southpark quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever modded this troll is a farking idiot. Take a look at the survival rate provided by WHO. At the height of the outbreak, the death rate was around 12%. Holy f'ing cow! 12% of humans on this earth will probably die from slipping in the shower.

  12. Living in Toronto.... by XplosiveX · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I should say that the SARS scarce has crippled our tourism economy because of all the media hype from around the world. Tourists don't even need to be worried about it because the only potential way of acquiring the disease is to be in the hospitals where the patients who have it are being quarantined.

    Thankfully the city of Toronto has since been removed from the list of cities with SARS and hopefully the upcoming concert featuring the Rolling Stones will help promote our city and bring back the tourists in the masses.

    1. Re:Living in Toronto.... by Boo+Robin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The SARS publicity has been a good thing for the Toronto consumers though. Due to a lack of tourism and people spending money, a lot of stores have dropped the prices of their products. Since I live in Toronto, this is great. But I must say, the WHO putting us on the hot list really messed up our economy. We are already a city out of money, and this didn't help much.

      -Boo

      --
      'Give me one more medicated peaceful moment'
    2. Re:Living in Toronto.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, bring in a few old farts who look like they were raveged by everything from the clap to lepresy to claim your city is healthy.

      Keith looks like a cadaver for 20 years and hes gonna promote the healthy image of a city?

      I think a strung out crack ho would do a better job...then again, thats what the Stones look like so I guess they have that covered.

      zack

  13. Slippery slope by ObviousGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not saying you're a homophobe, but your "solution" would at some point entail quarantining infected vectors. This would mean that if someone were to claim AIDS as an epidemic (which some already do) then millions of infected people would need to be separated from the uninfected population. Considering the demographics of AIDS infection, it is clear that large numbers of gay men would necessarily need to have their lives disrupted in order to meet quarantine requirements.

    Also if we consider that AIDS is a non-curable disease, there is really no chance for the infected to ever come out of quarantine, thus leaving them in an apartheid-esque state of submission.

    The most important thing is to raise health standards globally so that people are more able to ward off disease as they encounter it. Starting with something as easy as implementing U.S. poultry and livestock cleanliness standards to certain asian countries' food processing industries would go a long way in fighting off outbreaks of flu-like viruses.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Slippery slope by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      HIV is different because a) it has a hard-to-detect incubation time of often several years before developing into AIDS, b)it is already endemic, and c) it lasts a long time, but is eventually terminal.

      If there were only a few hundred cases, with easily identifiable, early signs, and a short quarantine period, then absolutely that would be a solution.

      --
      Jeremy
    2. Re:Slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I agree. As AIDS and other STDs are primarily diseases associated with a certain type of behavior (promiscuous anal sex for gay men, vaginal/anal sex among heterosexual couples) then quarantining them would be a direct violation of their civil rights.

      As the SCOTUS has just ruled, there is nothing illegal about sodomy. Therefore imprisoning these people, even if we were to have caught it at the outset, would be wrong and unjustified. It would be a violation of the Equal Protection clause, to be precise.

      We are not talking about something like the flu which eventually goes away. AIDS eventually kills, but in the meantime it is entirely possible that the infected vector could live a full and productive gay lifestyle despite the disease.

      For you it may be a public health issue, but for millions of gay men this is a serious civil rights issue.

    3. Re:Slippery slope by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      that was my point. One of the reasons I listed (for why we CAN'T quarantine them) is that it is terminal 100% of the time. We agree completely.

      --
      Jeremy
    4. Re:Slippery slope by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Cuba anyone? The only country that I know of that quarantines people with HIV.

    5. Re:Slippery slope by gillbates · · Score: 1

      Also if we consider that AIDS is a non-curable disease, there is really no chance for the infected to ever come out of quarantine, thus leaving them in an apartheid-esque state of submission.

      Don't give the government any new ideas. If they'll take away our right to privacy (*cough*patriot act*cough), then this is the next logical step.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    6. Re:Slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If gay men hadn't been so successful in converting this public health issue into a civil rights issue, we may have been able to deal with the spread of AIDS in North America as successfully as we have the spread of SARS.

      Instead gay men, and of course drug users and more and more just random straight people, will continue to live with and die from AIDS until a cure is found.

  14. been "all clear" for a while by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

    yeah, we havent heard much about it in weeks; its been pretty much contained quickly after the last "outbreak" btw, i live in richmond hill, pretty much the epicenter of SARS in north america.. York Central Hospital is only a few blocks away..

    --


    Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
  15. Parent not a Troll by southpolesammy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think about it. In 5-6 months from now, who will be surprised when news comes out that SARS is on the loose again, and then a similar announcement 11-12 months from now from the WHO that it is contained (once again).

    While I was picking on /. for their recent bad habit of republishing old stories, my comment is somewhat relevant -- not at all a troll, but a comment on my lack of confidence in the WHO to make such a statement, and one that has been made before...

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    1. Re:Parent not a Troll by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      lack of confidence in the WHO to make such a statement,

      They stated it was contained, not wiped out. It's impossible to wipe out a virus that can spread from animals as well as person to person. Doctors have said they expect it back next winter, though it shouldn't be as serious.

  16. Re:Celebrations In HK by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We went to Ocean Park a couple of weeks ago. It was great to just walk on to any ride we wanted to ... of course the park was losing millions and reduced its hours. And personally I lost a lot of money as classes I teach were cancelled due to SARS hysteria. Kids still have to have their temperature taken at school each morning before beig allowed to go in. At least they don't have to wear the silly facemasks now (these work to prevent spread if you're infected, but are little or no help in stopping you from gettng it, especially as most don't fit them tightly).

  17. Some perspective on SARS. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This cartoon nicely sums up my opinion of the whole SARS thing:

    http://www.vgcats.com/vgc_comics/?strip_id=62

    Practical effect here in Toronto:

    First outbreak: People were edgy for about two weeks, and a few wore masks. Anyone with a cold got nervous looks when they coughed. Then the novelty wore off and it was business as usual.

    Second outbreak: Nil.

    The number of people quarantined was about 1% of the city's population. The number of people who were actually sick was far lower. The number of people _dead_ was lower than the number of people murdered here in an average year, and we're a city not known for its violence.

    Take is seriously? Sure. Panic? Not justified.

    The real harm is that the attention on SARS has drawn attention away from things like West Nile Virus.

    1. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Were there really ~26,000+ people quarantined? (Assuming you just mean Toronto which has ~2.6m population IIRC).

      -psy

    2. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Troll

      and we're a city [Toronto] not known for its violence.


      Speaking from Montreal, you are...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well richmond hill isnt really toronto anyways so it doesnt really matter. if you were to count all the places that consider themselves toronto we would be about 8mil. the sign on the 427 comming in says thats its about 3 i think, but thats just downtown. i dont think anyone bothered to make new signs after amalgamation since they cant even fix the duplicate street names.

    4. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      Were there really ~26,000+ people quarantined?

      Yes, according to the article linked to this story. That's probably a running total over the course of the entire outbreak, as opposed to there being that number quarantined all at once.

    5. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Crickey, never realized there was that many people incaserated....and I live here (Toronto)!

      -psy

    6. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Also most of those people were in voluntary quarantine (stay home) for two weeks because they might have come in contact with someone who might have SARS.

      The number of people in real quarantine was much less.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      and we're a city [Toronto] not known for its violence.

      Speaking from Montreal, you are...

      This seems odd, as googling for homicide rates puts both Montreal and Vancouver at about double our rate, with the prarie provinces even worse (as of 1990, which was the first listing I found). The big US cities had rates about 10 times worse than _that_.

      Source cited was Statistics Canada for the Canadian cities, so you can probably dig up more recent figures if you feel like it (I don't).

    8. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      >The real harm is that the attention on SARS has >drawn attention away from things like West Nile >Virus. ... and J.Lo

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    9. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by lightsaber1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Take is seriously? Sure. Panic? Not justified.

      The real harm is that the attention on SARS has drawn attention away from things like West Nile Virus.

      I remember watching CNN showing pictures from China and Toronto with everybody wearing masks as they walk down the street (in TO, anyways, it was clearly staged, or else from a VERY small sampling of the city). We know how the media can blow a lot of things out of proportion. Also, look at that one loopy cow out in Alberta, suddenly none of our Canadian beef is acceptable in the US and many other countries. Once people get an idea in their heads, it's nearly impossible to change their minds.

      West Nile is probably a bigger problem than SARS ever was (and even it's not as bad as most people make out), and though it gets some attention, it's nothing compared to the energy put towards SARS and Mad Cow. We can't control the spread of West Nile unless we can kill all them mosquitos (please???!?!?!), for the others we have systems in place.

      SARS is contained now...let's not forget about it, but let's make sure we're prepared for West Nile. As far as the Mad Cow goes...there's nothing wrong with Canadian beef -- you'll note that the ONE SINGLE case was CAUGHT by food inspection so it never entered the food chain -- says something about the quality of our systems. Not to mention, even if you eat an infected piece of meat, the odds of getting K-Y are slim-to-none.

    10. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by jordie · · Score: 1

      I like how you went from talking down one over-hyped "sickness" to talking up another.

      Don't look now but the killer bee's are coming to get you! :P

    11. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Emphasis on the "known" for, not the statistically recognised as...

      so you can probably dig up more recent figures if you feel like it (I don't).

      Me neither

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by MicroBerto · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Am I the only person that is NEVER impressed by these dry humored new-age internet comics?

      Hahaha as I read what I just wrote, maybe you don't want to check out my signature.. :)

      --
      Berto
    13. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      I like how you went from talking down one over-hyped "sickness" to talking up another.

      I don't consider West Nile to be a serious threat. It is, however, still the one we should be worrying about this time of year (mosquito season), and taking steps to reduce (draining stagnant ponds in our yards, and so forth).

      The government was just gearing up the annual "please don't provide mosquito breeding grounds in-city" ad blitz, when SARS hit and everyone went loopy. I find this irritating, so I mentioned it.

    14. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by legojenn · · Score: 1
      I had this crazy idea to cash in on the SARS paranoia when my roommate went to Toronto to visit a friend. I took a surgical mask I used for my Holloween costume and wrote on it:

      My roommate went to Toronto and all I got was this surgical mask.

      I could have made tonnes o' bucks but unfortunately, with the SARS scare over, my opportunity was lost.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    15. Re:Some perspective on SARS. by Tuzanor · · Score: 1

      This was also more affecting the greater Toronto area than just Toronto itself. It's safe to say that this was 26000 out of 4 or 5 million.

  18. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they could run a story "Spam from SCO about SARS" and get it all done in one shot. Member of the League of Ordinary Gentlemen

  19. A relief by redune45 · · Score: 1

    I'm one of many who's life has been seriously affected by this disease.
    All that I feel right now is a huge sense of relief.
    Great job to everbody who helped to end it all.

    --
    redune.com: The World 3.2 Megapixels at a time
    1. Re:A relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now this is news, a third worlder with internet access.

  20. but for how long? by donutz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yay, they've gotten SARS contained, whatever that means. Meanwhile we've got monkeypox to deal with (damn those Wisconsin domesticated prairie dog owners!) and the West Nile virus is scheduled to reach California this summer...

    I guess we just have to deal with the fact that we're always going to have to deal with some disease or disaster. As much as we hate to admit it (even for steadfast believers in evolution) we are just animals, after all, and while we may have lots of medicines and other weapons on our side, nature has still got plenty of tricks up her sleeves too.

    1. Re:but for how long? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, this is starting to piss me off. Oh no, Monkeypox! Ahhh! It's related to smallpox! No! Wait, it's also related to chickenpox and is about as deadly. Yeah, but it gives you nasty sores! Which go away after a while... so the latest media scare is about a disease closely related to a common childhood infection which gives you sores and then goes away. How's that for media hysteria?

  21. This could have all been avoided if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    people would just leave the monkies alone!!!

    1. Re:This could have all been avoided if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Tell that to Michael Jackson.

    2. Re:This could have all been avoided if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooohhhh yeah! monkeysex! It's the best baby!

    3. Re:This could have all been avoided if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the flashy banner said I'd get a prize... :(

  22. Re:southpark quote... by Alystair · · Score: 1

    And the death rate percentage during the black plague in Europe was ONLY %30, WOW!

  23. Shouldn't nerds cheer SARS? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We all know bad things happen from overpopulation (too many laws, intellectual property). Why not something to thin the herd and/or kill it off completely? Let a species that won't dream up something dumb like copyrights come to power.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Shouldn't nerds cheer SARS? by RodgerDodger · · Score: 5, Funny

      I take it you're volunteering to be a candidate for herd-thinning?

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
  24. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think to be a manager for The WHO would be a dream come true for Rob.

  25. I have an image that represents this... by Alystair · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://www.emotioneric.com/emotionfill/preventsars .html Emotion Eric can be used for anything nowadays!

  26. Do not be afraid of SARS by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Wash your hands, do not spit in the street, and cover your blow when you sneeze.

    Do not talk in ways that insite fear and loathing. Together we can conquor and TERMINATE outbreak. If one man screws it up for everybody, shame on him!

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
    1. Re:Do not be afraid of SARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see etiquette starting to be promoted in asia.

  27. Re:robin hood? by SamNmaX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many people in the states died of it?
    Over 800 people died worldwide, and over 8000 had it. See here

    SARS could have very well been the answer to China's overpopulation issues.
    I'm sorry, but I can't believe this shit has been modded as "insightful". I guess it doesn't matter as long as it's Asians. :P

  28. RTFM noob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    posts do not get removed. you are just not browsing at -1, which is necessary for you to see it on the page (note the "n replies beneath your current threshold" -- that's where you can find the first post.

    and since you mentioned your precious karma, I'd just like to ask, who the fuck cares? believe it or not, I have excellent karma and let me tell you, there's nothing special about it. 'karma' is just cmdrtaco's lame ploy to try to get people to post somewhat coherent additions to the terrible stories (and most often, they're written by michael).

  29. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sales of Embola Cola remain steady.

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...last seen leaving the building in the company of a man dressed in a turban and a beard..

  30. SARS Contained? by Azadre · · Score: 0

    From what I know, SARS was similar to a virus that infects rabbits when they overpopulate so some scientists felt SARS was due to the overpopulation of China... I think it should really say we were contained.

  31. ummm, no, because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you get SARS, you have a MUCH higher chance of dying than if you get the flu. And the whole "it spread to other countries fast as hell thing. And the whole "there's nothing we can do but tell you to stay away from people with it" thing.

  32. SARS Contained... by EverDense · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and let that be a lesson to you.
    Make sure the seals on the building you use for bio-weapon testing are solid.

    Who stole my tinfoil hat?

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  33. Uh... It's Summer Folks... by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, the flu doesn't spread so virulently during the summer. Heck, most of the time flu season is during the winter. The flu doesn't hide during the summer, it's just dormant and afflicting only a few people.

    The question is, once fall/winter comes, will SARS spread again? And will it be worse now - i.e., is it dormant and people will unwittingly spread it to other people?

    It may be contained now, but is it really? Or if the weather turns a bit cold, we see more outbreaks?

    1. Re:Uh... It's Summer Folks... by don.g · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may not have noticed, but the earth is a sphere. While the bit you are in may be tilted towards the sun, the bit I'm in ain't. It's FREEZING here.

      Thankfully, we haven't had a SARS outbreak. Just the standard damn-it's-cold-ah-choo etc.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    2. Re:Uh... It's Summer Folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, in countries with tropical climate in the Northern Hemisphere, it's rainy season starting late May or early June upto September. Plus, in the south, it's winter.

  34. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The container has been misplaced...

  35. Good for Toronto... by stevens · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...bad for lunch.

    I live in Toronto, and all the great asian restaurants near work were half-empty instead of jam-packed due to SARS overreaction. I had never had such an easy time getting a table for lunch.

    Oh well... the dream is over.

  36. This is what started this whole thing... by canning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As soon as Toronto gets taken off the list there are massive celebrations and the same thing happened in Hong Kong. That's not a bad thing per say but I can't help but wonder if people are letting their guard down.

    The Singapore government has done a fantastic job in containing and combating SARS and they continue to do so even after being of the WHO's list for sometime now. Daily temperature checks for public servants and temperature scanning at all ports of entry continue. They've even gone far as to develop a SARS channel on cable TV. Bottom line, we have to continue to live but not live ignorantly.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
    1. Re:This is what started this whole thing... by elambi · · Score: 1

      There havn't been any massive celebrations here in Toronto once we were taken off the list as far as I can tell. The planned Rolling Stones concert is to help get the tourists coming back again. Sure we are relieved to be off the list but massive celebrations, I don't think so.

      --
      Sig, we don't need no stinking Sig!
  37. Oh dear by egg+troll · · Score: 0
    Another example of why we should stop shipping slaves to the US. These africoons eat monkey brains and come infested with these diseases such as AIDS and SARS.


    I don't know which is more appalling: your sense of racial equality or your understanding of virology.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  38. Well now we know by ShadyG · · Score: 2, Funny

    When the terrorist biological weapon hits, releasing some robust, vaccine-resistant mutation of smallpox, whichever city it lands in will do its best to keep it under wraps so as not to damage its tourism industry. SARS was benign. I am not encouraged.

  39. FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn .. after sitting out the virus incubation period here in Beijing it's a relief to finally be rid of this damn SARS plague *SNEEZE* It's about *cough* time that *sneeze* we chine*sneeze* se *cough* can*cough* *wheeze* gkjdsaf g-ggo abbo*cough* *sneeze* aout about our
    busin*groan* *gasp* ..
    air ..*gasp* oxygen

    *gasp* *cough*

  40. China's overpopulation issues by Smartcowboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    China have a huge population but now famillies are limited to 1 children. Chinesse prefer male child so there is a lack of female. If the plan of the autorities work, the chinesse population will drop very fast because the number of birth is proportional to the number of woman and the number of male have very few effect.

    But there may be some side-effects to this scenario:

    Do you think chinesse man will sit and say "Well, there is no girl available. Let's masturbate!"? Maybe some will do that. But they are more likely to search for female outside of china. In other asian countries, then in USA, EU, UK....

    Nobody know what will happens.... :S

    [Sorry for my choices of words. I know some of them wasn't realy appropriate.]

    1. Re:China's overpopulation issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you think chinesse man will sit and say "Well, there is no girl available. Let's masturbate!"? Maybe some will do that.

      Well, probably most of the Slashdot readers among them would do that.

    2. Re:China's overpopulation issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last i heard /. was blocked in china.

  41. Re:Celebrations In HK by cloudless.net · · Score: 2

    I went to Ocean Park in April, and thanks to SARS I didn't have to wait in line for any ride. It was interesting to see people wearing facemask in the park, and I even saw some people wearing mask to hike. Anyway, I would be less nervous if the government honestly reported SARS statistics.

  42. How much do WHO payoffs cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How much did Toronto have to pay off the WHO to lift the travel ban the first time, when as soon as they did the SARS outbreak took off like wildfire? I think the WHO don't know jack and are just looking to make some bucks off threatening cities with 'travel bans'.

    1. Re:How much do WHO payoffs cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure, but I think it was slightly less than the amount the United States spent on covering up its own massive SARS infection.

  43. What's Really Funny by TheCanucklehead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is to remember when the WHO tried to announce that Malaria was eradicated from the earth.

    1. Re:What's Really Funny by bad_fx · · Score: 1

      remember when the WHO tried to announce that Malaria was eradicated from the earth.

      I don't remember that... was Townshend working as some sort of microbiologist at the time or something?

  44. not contained... by stubblehead · · Score: 1

    ...but dying off

    --

    Rock!
  45. SARS is NOT dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those 20-people chineese villages still have infected people....

    1. Re:SARS is NOT dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Russia, they murder all victims.

  46. I Live 1 hour north of Toronto by tyrani · · Score: 1

    So this whole sars thing has effected me and my business. The apparent confusion that the world health organization has between declaring Toronto safe, not safe, and now safe until the next time comes down to simple marketing.

    It is no secret that the sars outbreak is a very serious thing brought to light by post-war news coverage that needs another headline. Much of the worry has been created by the media and really only effects tourisim.

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
  47. Re:southpark quote... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    I think that was the century flu(see early 1900's), if I remember right the plauge was closer to 90%.

    The phrase "decimation of the european continent" should give you a good scope of the number of people that died from it.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  48. It's Oficial... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netcraft confirms: SARS is dying...

  49. Stephen Kings: SARS by Unixinvid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really worry about how we as a wealthy nation use anti-biotics like candy, for things like the common strep throat. When I see the SARS case I see somthing out of a Stephen King Novel with the plot of being pawns in someones game. If we had a better combined effort in sharing meds, technology we would have half of the problems that we are facing.

    1. Re:Stephen Kings: SARS by thynk · · Score: 1

      Stephen King or a new Tom Clancy? Seems that Tom tends to lean more towards the political manipulation, rather than King who generally tends to focus on the "almost" supernatural.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  50. Any first hand experience in China? by WoTG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are there any Slashdotters out there with first hand perspectives on the current SARS situation in China? I've been wondering why outbreaks have only 'occured' in the big cities. Do smaller outbreaks in less well known cities not get picked up by Western media? With such densely populated cities, plus a few months of a head start in having SARS around, I find it rather remarkable that it was contained at all.

    Heck, even Toronto had a second outbreak while everyone was still on alert. Mind you, that's not meant as an negative comment on my fellow Canadians, rather it's a statement of how hard it must be to contain this particular bug - there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of room for error.

    1. Re:Any first hand experience in China? by sonatinas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to live in Shenzhen ,China during the SARS outbreak. THe government hid it for most of the time, but some of my co-workers were telling me about this"flu" that was going around. As a result everyone bought vinagar and its price went up. After all the panic Hong Kong was getting the news and the people that i talked to about it, such as teachers , said that the "flu" went with the weather and went to Hong Kong and nothing to worry about. However, they were wrong. The outbreak at Amoy Gardens was from a man who lived in Shenzhen. That foreign teacher who died taught in Shenzhen. The school that I taught at had a case of it,but the people at large really didnt care. Thats how china is. WHen the newspapers finally started reporting it and Hu jintao was getting serious about it, public opinion changed, but still ignorant. My students thought i was crazy going to Hong Kong even though i had to remind them that SARS began here. However when I went to Macau, there were no cases at the time. I suppose all the STDs from the prostitutes was enough. THe chinese didnt really care or know anything about it thanks to blantant censorship and their view on life, such as the millions of migrant workers here that are expendable and such. Even when China claimed to have it under control, they found SARS in cats in resturantsat the shopping mall where i got my pirated GBA games.

  51. Medicine = Life by heli0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Taiwan had reported 674 cases of SARS and 84 deaths -- the highest death total after China, with 348 deaths and Hong Kong with 298. The United States reported 73 cases but no deaths.

    SARS contained across the globe

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Medicine = Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. The reason there were no deaths in the US is it didn't spread in hospitals. The vast majority of deaths are when the disease spreads to the sick and elderly with chronic problems. The cases in the US are pretty much people who contracted the disease elsewhere and were young/healthy enough before hand to travel.

      Besides, what makes you think you have better medicine in the US than they have in Hong Kong. The US health care system is crap.

    2. Re:Medicine = Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The United States reported 73 cases but no deaths.

      Oh yeah? What about all the Pneumonia III cases?

    3. Re:Medicine = Life by someguyintoronto · · Score: 1

      Before you go ahead and make some stupid close-minded comment that the US has medicine and Canada (or China) do not... think... please...

      In Canada (and a number of other progressive countries) people have something called free health care.

      If SARS had hit a major US city before Toronto (marking the first North American outbreak) the outcome probably could have been a great deal worst. Imagine the situation: someone in a low-income tax bracket develops a fever and a bit of a cough. These are SARS symptoms, but they are so common. No medical plan, so that person decides not to go to the hospital. SARS has a fast and efficient rate of transferal. So then that person gives SARS to their family, whos children bring it to school. All because of a hesitation to go to the hospital right away because of $.

      Our health care immediately opened up special SARS clinics and our already inplace Heath Hotline (1-800 number to speak directly to a nurse) help track potential SARS infections. Although we had a large outbreak (relative to the US) and yes people died, we had a health care system that prevent a bad situation fom turning into a true epidemic.

      (and no our health care isn't perfect, but it did it's job)

    4. Re:Medicine = Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because western medecine doesn't prescribe shit like tiger dick, monkey brains, & endangered species soup. Stupid asians.

    5. Re:Medicine = Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say C.O.V.E.R.U.P.? Just think, it cost Toronto over a BILLION dollars in lost tourism, so the US covering up our actual infection/death rate would have been easy (thanks to our easily scared populace) and relatively cheap.

  52. Is it really contained? by Qweezle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I'm skeptical as to whether the disease is really contained...I will believe that Toronto is safe for now, but I disagree with anyone saying that China's SARS is contained. China is a huge nation, and I feel that if SARS went largely untreated over there(which is likely), then there could most certainly be a threat for people in China, and travelers, and for that matter all Asian countries. Now, everyone is saying how China's SARS outbreak is largely over, and I disagree. I think the Chinese government is hiding more than they wish to reveal. China is a budding superpower, and they wouldn't want something like this to tarnish their reputation, so they hide it. There's more to this than the media's telling us, I feel... _____________________

    1. Re:Is it really contained? by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Especially, if you compare the SARS graph with that of other countries. China is the country where the number of infected cases dropped the fastest in the whole world, even faster than in Hong Kong and Canada. Either they reported too many SARS cases earlier on, or they are reporting too few cases now. Honestly, it would not surprise me if in half a year the Chinese government has to acknowledge that they had been playing down the numbers.

  53. Re:Toronto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are dead. People with family and friends.

  54. To Quote South Park... by mcp33p4n75 · · Score: 1

    "Stan! You must find a cure for SARS. I only have a 98% chance of living!"
    At least South Park was able to see SARS hype was overblown...

    1. Re:To Quote South Park... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That's the best thing about south park. Best political satire on tv.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  55. Re:Current Viral Threat by fussman · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Linux is the OS of choice of Islamic Terrorists

    You ignorant troll. It was actually old unlicenced versions of windows 95 and 98 that were the most popular choice of Islamic Terrorists. We need to get rid of another virus. It's name is you.

    --
    Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
  56. Re:robin hood? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

    more than 800 people die every year from the common cold and way more than 8,000 get it. Yeah, not an epidemic, not a scare, nothing to worry about.

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
  57. Why are you worried about West Nile? by mdielmann · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look. Also, keep in mind that most people that get west nile don't know they're sick, and we still only have a death rate in diagnosed cases of about 7.5%. On a more sensationalist note, about as many people died in 9/11 as were diagnosed with West Nile in all of 2002, and even then, less than 300 died, out of about 300 million people. The flu(!) kills about 36000 per year in the US. It's going to be another 20 years or so before I worry about West Nile, and I'm paranoid ;)

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  58. Re:robin hood? by 2Bits · · Score: 1

    >>SARS could have very well been the answer to China's overpopulation issues.
    >I'm sorry, but I can't believe this shit has been modded as "insightful". I guess it doesn't matter as long as it's Asians. :P

    Amen, brother. Please mod parent up.

    This is the kind of ignorant attitude that makes Americans hated by so many people. Don't get me wrong, I've lived in the US for 5 years, and most Americans are just fine people. A few loose-gun assholes like this one give American people very bad reputation outside.

    Anyways, we are happy in China that this thing is over. A lot of businesses would have gone belly up, if this were to prolong for another month or so. A friend of mine, who is the CEO of a small trading company (oil industry monitoring devices), has seen their business drop by 50%, and they are the lucky one. Another friend's company, which is tightly related to travel industry, saw his business go down by 95%.

  59. Re: Don't overestimate quality of food inspection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's misleading to high-five Canada's food inspection system over that infected cow found in Alberta. Essentially, the animal was clearly exhibiting symptoms of the disease and so it was obviously necessary to remove it from the system.

    It is reasonable to think that many other animals may have been infected by that one animal, or co-infected by whatever source infected that one animal.

    In particular, note that an autopsy is necessary to conclusively diagnose Mad Cow, so there is a short-sighted economic incentive to assume that animals are healthy, unless there is overwhelming evidence (as in this case) that the animal is infected.

    Further, there was a lag of several months between the time the animal was removed from the system, and the time any statement about it was released to the public.

    Sure the public over-reacts, and often with valid reason: the agriculture industry and the government have demonstrated that they value human lives only on aggregate.

  60. That's a myth. by Arnold_Crenshaw · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's because of how well it's spread in densely populated areas, eg in Asia. It's possibly more contagious, but then nobody's been getting their seasonal SARS shots, either.

    You can't compare how many they've killed this year if one is being fought with foreknowledge and another races through a petri dish of panicked people.

  61. Yay for Symantec by Cobralisk · · Score: 3, Funny

    I personally give credit to their anit-virus software. Why else would this be on /.?

    --
    Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
  62. Re:people who say "farking" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or frell. Fucking nerds.

  63. A couple books worth reading by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There are a couple of books worth reading to help understand the problem of emerging diseases. The shorter, somewhat sensationalistic one is The Hot Zone. The author characterizes the human race, when considering the availability of global airline travel, as a trillion pounds of meat just waiting for a virus.

    A much better, more informative book, also much longer, is Lauri Garrett's The Coming Plague. I believe it won the Pulitzer. I had the pleasure of hearing Ms. Garrett speak at the Capitola Book Cafe - she graduated from nearby UC Santa Cruz.

    I later heard Ms. Garrett speak on the radio regarding public health. She said a survey found that a majority of Americans, when asked, said that they were opposed to public health.

    (They were confused, and the confusion is unfortunate. The US doesn't have publicly funded medical care like Canada does, but public health is the reason the nation isn't swept with plagues every couple years. Things like mass vaccination, sewer treatment, mosquito abatement and the like. Americans are too dimwitted to know that that's what public health means.)

    Both books talk quite a bit about Ebola, and The Hot Zone describes an event when a bunch of research monkeys were imported to the U.S. that were infected with an Ebola-like virus.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:A couple books worth reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US doesn't have publicly funded medical care like Canada does, but public health is the reason the nation isn't swept with plagues every couple years. Things like mass vaccination, sewer treatment, mosquito abatement and the like. Americans are too dimwitted to know that that's what public health means.

      Uhh yeah, 'cause you know I hate it when im in the states and i'm hit with a plague every 2-3 years. When did this happen?

      sars infected under 100 stateside and killed NONE

      yes our Department of Fish and Game has mosquito abatment programs

      Please stay in toronto sars boy. keep your anti-american delusions there too.

      -S-

  64. Now I Can Retort... by Alan+Holman · · Score: 0

    In my line of work (interviewing Americans via telephone for a Canadian market research firm), I talk to a lot of Americans on the phone. A lot of the time when I tell them I'm Canadian, they ask me about SARS. Some people even said, "Are they still droppin' like flies from the SARS up there?" Now I can reply, "No."

  65. Re: Don't overestimate quality of food inspection by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1
    It's misleading to high-five Canada's food inspection system over that infected cow found in Alberta

    Maybe so, but it's also misleading ot suggest it's entirely ineffective.

    Sure the public over-reacts, and often with valid reason

    That makes no sense, to over-react is to react more strongly than reason would allow

    It is reasonable to think that many other animals may have been infected by that one animal, or co-infected by whatever source infected that one animal.

    How many more herds need to be slaughtered and tested before everyone's convinced? What happens if they discover the cow came from the U.S.? Note that "infected by that animal" isn't an option -- it's only spread by one animal eating an infected animal, something that's outlawed for cows -- it's also entirely possible (though rare) for it to develop spontaneously in a given cow.

    Act with the best possible means to ensure health and safety for all? Certainly. Panic to the point where an entire industry dies out and the economy suffers drastically? No! Same goes with SARS.

    Everybody just needs a Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy lying around the house.

  66. Policy issues by John+Bayko · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One thing mentioned in the article but glossed over is the fact that a SARS patient was in Vancouver about the same time as in Toronto, but the information on this newly identified disease wasn't passed down to Toronto workers as it was in Vancouver.

    In Canada, as in the U.S, health care in general is a provincial responsibility (with parts delegated to the county or municipal level), with federal assistance. The government of Ontario is currently conservative, small-govermnent (i.e. pro-cutbacks) one for the past decade or so. One of the things that were cut back were the disease researchers whose job it was to identify new diseases, develop tests and diagnostic procedures for them, and distribute this information. A typical politician, the Health Car Minister justified this by asking "what, is a brand new disease going to magically appear?".

    Conversely, the past decade in BC has been a big-government (i.e. pro-spending) one, until recently (when a large fraction of the public sector was amputated). However, it has a more fully funded health care system, and was able to quickly react to the news of a new disease.

    With Ontario's "immune system" essentially crippled, it fell on other provinces (including BC, where the responsible corona virus DNA was first sequenced) and the federal government to pick up the slack.

    The relative merits of a mainly publically or mainly privately funded health care system can be debated, but one thing that any government should realize, regardless of it's political philosophy, is that whatever system it prefers, the one that exists must be fully supported even if it's counter to the party principles.

    Another lesson to be learned is that the world is becoming too mobile to leave health care as a purely local responsibility. In the case of Canada, Ontario might have been helpless except for the federal research facilities near Winnipeg, Manitoba, because of its health and safety negligence (the same negligence was responsible for water safety problems in Walkerton which led to a similar number of deaths). Without effective research, the outbreak could have spread country-wide.

    National governments may not be accountable enough either. China's government was downright deceitful over the spread of SARS in that country, and without international pressure and some wistle-blowers risking their jobs, the disease could still be spreading there.

    The fallout from these problems would not have been limited to single nations. If SARS had spread across Canada, the U.S would have had to choose between closing the border (which is the single largest flow of imports and exports for both countries), seriously crippling the U.S economy in the middle of trying to recover from a recession (maybe enough to make it a depression, and killing G.W.Bush's chances of re-election for good), or risking the spread into a wider population (and crippling the economy in another way).

    The World Health Organization is important, but it is only an advisory body - it has no authority to influence policy or implement operational changes in health care delivery. As a result, government from countries (China and others) to local (Ontario and others) have become holes in a global system, purely due to their own short-sightedness. These holes threaten world health these days.

    Further, there are entire regions where health care is inadequate simply because of economic poverty. Wealthy countries find it convenient to ignore the conditions in places like these, but it should be clear by now that those conditions can cost the wealthy countries billions or trillions of dollars of their own wealth due to the spread of diseases which are controllable. SARS (limited to countries with fairly well-developed health care systems) was a few pennies compared to the economic costs of AIDS (originating in countries with crumbling hospitals able to care for only a handful of their populations, most of whom never see a hospital in their entire lives).

    Obviously, it's in everyo

    1. Re:Policy issues by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

      Health care in the U.S. is, for the most part, privatized. If you don't have, at least, basic health insurance, you're basically screwed. You have to prove that your about to die to get basic emergency services. If you have any money at all, the hospitals are relentless in collections. The #1 reason for bankruptcy in the US is medical bills, usually as the result of major illness (on average of $50k+). Hospitals are worse than the shops of used-car dealerships; they both charge you for things you don't ask for, need, or even get! In fact, they'll often double-bill. There's no estimate, up-front pricing, and you agree to arbitrary rates that are not disclosed until after rendered. It's why you need to bring someone along that writes down everything that happens, every medication and every procedure. You can try to negotiate prices, since everything's always negotiable from some position.

      The problem is that most western governments consider people outside the borders to be expendable. What are 10, 1,000, or 1,000,000 dead to them when it's not their people or in their country (esp. if there's no resources/trade)? Again, who's gonna try to clean up the mess? The US as usual? The UN seems to be as ineffectual and impotent as usual when it comes to global health care (minus the WHO efforts). Throwing $1B or $10B at it when it's a $10T job just doesn't cut it. But when 2/3 of the UN's members are basically non-democratic autocracies, the welfare of other people aren't high on their agendas. Too bad we don't live in an enlightened, benevolent dictatorship where the best person to do the job is appointed. :( )

      If SARS becomes a perennial threat and reaches the same prevalence as the common cold, it could be a preventable/limitable catastrophe. Since most medicine works in a reactionary-mode and there were no cases in the US, we will be totally unprepared as usual. As usual, supply and demand will kick in and only the rich will get any of the limited supplies. If a stock-pile were built up, it could be possible to have enough to deal with the situation. The problem is two-fold: 1) cost and 2) expiry-ness of medications. The costs maybe prohibitive to manufacture enough of a given antibiotic or other medicine in scales enough to satisfy the needs. And, the investment in a stock-pile maybe unnecessary.

      However, SARS has the potential to make the 1918 Spanish Flu look like a paper-cut. Especially among immigrant populations, dorms, and urban centers, where the dense living conditions provide perfect transmission environments. I don't have the answer or know exactly what needs to be fixed, but the status quo is not so good. Cookie-cutter, Lemming-ish, reactionary solutions == bad.

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    2. Re:Policy issues by sylvester · · Score: 1

      seriously crippling the U.S economy in the middle of trying to recover from a recession (maybe enough to make it a depression, and killing G.W.Bush's chances of re-election for good)

      Is that what's referred to as a "manic depression"? :-)

      -Rob

    3. Re:Policy issues by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Conversely, the past decade in BC has been a big-government (i.e. pro-spending) one, until recently (when a large fraction of the public sector was amputated). However, it has a more fully funded health care system, and was able to quickly react to the news of a new disease.

      With Ontario's "immune system" essentially crippled, it fell on other provinces (including BC, where the responsible corona virus DNA was first sequenced) and the federal government to pick up the slack.

      The relative merits of a mainly publically or mainly privately funded health care system can be debated, but one thing that any government should realize, regardless of it's political philosophy, is that whatever system it prefers, the one that exists must be fully supported even if it's counter to the party principles.


      Damn, don't you hate it when people use the latest media topic to support their favorite political peeve? Note that I don't disagree (I happen to support public healthcare) but, really now...

      The fact is, the reason BC fared better than Ontario during the SARs crisis is they were simply better informed and reacted more efficiently. Why? Because they're the friggin' Canadian gate to the Pacific Rim! Knowing this, they keep a pretty sharp eye out on health reports coming out of the Asian continent. As a result, while Ontario was blissfully ignorant, the BC health ministry was keeping a close watch on various WHO reports coming out which documented a mysterious upper-respiratory infection in China.

      In fact, before the SARs scare broke, BC had sent out orders to their health care workers telling them to isolate any individuals exhibiting symptoms of "atypical pneumonia". As a result, when the first infected individuals arrived in BC, they were immediately quarantined. Contrast this with the Ontario case, where their first infected patient was placed in a room with two other patients who were later discovered to have contracted the disease.

      In short, the failure of the Ontario health system during the SARs scare had little to do with its level of privatization and everything to do with their lack of diligence in monitoring world health trends. Hopefully they'll learn from this experience.

      * BTW, in case your wondering, the information in this post was primarily from a CBC report on the this very topic.

    4. Re:Policy issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In short, the failure of the Ontario health system during the SARs scare had little to do with its level of privatization and everything to do with their lack of diligence in monitoring world health trends.


      Ummm, are you being dense on purpose? THe original poster said that if it weren't for the cutbacks made by the conservative government, Ontario would have been able to do things like monitor world health trends. Your reply only supports this position.

    5. Re:Policy issues by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, are you being dense on purpose? THe original poster said that if it weren't for the cutbacks made by the conservative government, Ontario would have been able to do things like monitor world health trends. Your reply only supports this position.

      Don't be naive. The lack of monitoring in the Ontario health ministry had little to do with funding and everything to do with lack of motivation and perhaps even a lack of understanding regarding their need to respond. They simply did not think to monitor WHO reports coming out of Asia, and if they did, their response to these reports was not significant enough to stop the disease before it began spreading. I mean, honestly, how much does it cost to have some guys reading WHO reports and sending out warnings to health officials about anything suspicious? Using money as an excuse for their poor performance is just that, an excuse... and a baseless one (and a convenient one... "Oh, we couldn't do our job because, err, we didn't have enough money! Yeah! Blame the Premier! It's his fault!" Puhlease...)

    6. Re:Policy issues by John+Bayko · · Score: 1
      The relative merits of a mainly publically or mainly privately funded health care system can be debated, but one thing that any government should realize, regardless of it's political philosophy, is that whatever system it prefers, the one that exists must be fully supported even if it's counter to the party principles.

      Damn, don't you hate it when people use the latest media topic to support their favorite political peeve? Note that I don't disagree (I happen to support public healthcare) but, really now...

      I tried to keep it neutral. If the government preferred a privatized system, that's fine, as long as health care services don't fall through the cracks during the transition, and the new system is functional. Also politicians shouldn't be stupid, but are (stating the obvious).

      But the main point I wanted to make was also one that you made:

      the reason BC fared better than Ontario during the SARs crisis is they were simply better informed and reacted more efficiently. Why? Because they're the friggin' Canadian gate to the Pacific Rim! Knowing this, they keep a pretty sharp eye out on health reports coming out of the Asian continent.
      Regionalism and defense of bureaucratic fifdoms are outdated concepts, and dangerous these days. BC is not the gateway to Asia, it's just a little closer - not enough to make a difference. All areas of the world are becoming vulnerable to the spread of diseases in the same way.

      Basically, I'm advocating that responsibility for health care shouldn't be exclusively vested in one decision maker, because that becomes a single point of failure (see stupid politicians above), and it requires resources that may not be available at that level, while the results of inadequate resources can (and do) affect those who could (if they wanted to) do a lot towards redressing that resource shortfall.

  67. It won't affect me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I live in the heart of Toronto. I mean, who goes outside anyhow? pffft LOOSERS!

    But for real, downtown in the t-dot-izzo and I've seen ONE PERSON wearing a mask the whole time of this SARS episode. ONE PERSON in all of the downtown that I am in daily. He was chinese, and had bags around his ankles and hands. I think he was a schizo anyhow.

    But I'm young, dumb and full of cu^h^hlife so what do I care. At twenty one and prime health I can defend against it. I pitty the 50+ crowd.

    1. Re:It won't affect me by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Most young patients survived. Cough .. Cough ... but your parents, cough ..... girl friend(s) , cough ... might ........... cough ......... not.

  68. and... by sonatinas · · Score: 1

    China is probably going to continue to voer up some cases, expicall y in the major ecomonic zones such as SHanghai, SHenzhen, and Beijing. If they just stopped spitting and other un sanitary things, and most importantly learn to build an apt complex that doesnt spread disease and make the building smell like feces they could get some real work done. However, its hard to break old habits. My apt had similiar piping as Amoy Gardens, when i lived in china people hocked spit like it was their job, even while running top speed to catch the bus. When i first arrived in SHenzhen last year there was already a pink eye problem in the city and in buses many people had it. If hong hong didnt get infected, who knows what might have happened.

    1. Re:and... by juuri · · Score: 1

      People spit to cleanse out the "bad spirits" and "diseases".

      At least thats what I've been told.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    2. Re:and... by tenshioboe · · Score: 1

      oh, what i would give to be able to mod parent up +1 ironic...

  69. SARS contained... by Braintrust · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but GAMERA Unleashed!

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
  70. Re:robin hood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... you've just said that the common cold is less fatal then SARS. Why does this mean it's nothing to worry about?

  71. Diseases? Pfff by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    Humanity 1, Mother Earth 0

    Oh wait...

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  72. Watch out! It may be SEASONAL! by thinkerdreamer · · Score: 1

    I read an article once that hypothesized that SARS may be seasonal. I was rather struck by it because I had hypothesized myself it looked seasonal. So, if I am right, SARS is not at all dead but dormant. It will awake around fall/winter with the flu season. If it does, we may not be able to contain it this time around.

    A vaccine would be nice and should be quite easy since it doesn't mutate. If there is a vaccine, we all might have to take it.

    I also predict that we'll have many more new diseases like SARS every few years threatening the world population. Some may be even more deadly. It will not stop here.

    Celebrate for now, but watch out!

  73. Antibacterial Craze by cmallinson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we continue using antibacterial products EVERYWHERE, we will have a whole lot of diseases far worse than SARS on our hands. Don't people understand that by using mild antibacterial agents, we are helping disease evolve into strains that we may never be able to deal with?

    1. Re:Antibacterial Craze by iso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The parent post is off-topic. SARS is a virus, not a bacteria, and has nothing to do with increased antibiotic use.

  74. All three fear mongering channels have covered it by yerricde · · Score: 1
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  75. The SARS front by Clockwork000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    WHO just likes to pimp out drugs. The virus that supposedly caused SARS was never actually isolated. The amount of the "virus" is what usually determines how devistating the virus is. The amount of SARS was never measured in any patients because they didn't know what they were really looking for. Add to this the fact that a large portion of the people who died were elderly. Give an elderly person, with a weak immune system, some drugs...quarenteen em in a depressing place like a hospital....tell em they have a deadly virus. Even if they never had anything in the first place, the negative effects of the above is enough to kill a person. In the end, the OP works out for WHO. They make themselves look like saviors. What happens to the countries that go against WHO's agenda? They get called inhumane and denied future aid. So...the media makes a huge deal out of a variation of the flu, people run scared and buy worthless masks, and WHO is the hero!!! WHO is an organization run by ex and current Pharmaceutical stock holders. They pump out new and deadly diseases, and viruses. Then the drugs start flowing. Then the cash starts flowing. SARS is just another OP to make WHO look godlike. Period. 1. Create worldwide scare 2. Save the world with a cure 3. PROFIT!!

    --
    get em girls. daddy needs new shoes.
  76. Are you people idiots? by VPN3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh dear God, the people posting messages stating that SARS was over-hyped and nothing serious are really, really looking like twits.

    First off, if the 'media hype' had not taken place, countries would have not been pressured to take measures (by scared civilians) to control it. Thus, SARS would have spread to a MUCH larger percentage of the population. 10% deathrate doesn't sound like revelations or anything, but think of your elderly parents and grand parents. They would likely have a very tough time. Remember, the 10% if overall. That can mean 19-35 year olds have a 3% chance of death, but elderly could have something like 85-90% since their immune systems can't cope.

    Secondly, scientists still don't understand the virus. Wouldn't you like to give them a little extra time to come to grips with how it works and what gets rid of it before you talk out of your ass about how it's not serious?

    Third, this is a virus. Not a bacterial infection. It's quite likely this will become a recurring disease. You take drugs to help fight it, most gets killed off, some mutates, goes to sleep for a few months, then re-infects with the mutated virus; then is likely harder to battle.

    Finally, did you people who think it's not serious bother to read about the condition of SARS patients who have recovered? Didn't think so. They may have survived, but most have permanent scarring in their lungs. You want that to happen to you and your family? Want to have to wait and wonder, dreading the next 'season'? What if it comes back? You might not be able to survive a second infection since your lungs are still damaged from the first one.

    I don't mean to sound offensive, but what sort of idiot wants to take chances? It really bothers me that 'geeks' would feel this way, considering we are supposed to be some of the smarter ones. Guess I was wrong...

    1. Re:Are you people idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Oh dear God, the people posting messages stating that SARS was over-hyped and nothing serious are really, really looking like twits."

      Just wait till winter, then they will probably look worse.

    2. Re:Are you people idiots? by Bartmoss · · Score: 1
      We are supposed to be some of the smarter ones. Guess I was wrong...

      This is slashdot, dude. Doesn't that tell you anything? Even if you do not have any sarcastic opinion or comment about that, one could argue that geeks are interested solely in other, "cooler" catastrophes like asteroid impacts or a new ice age. Stuff that is easy to understand. Stuff that seems unlikely enough to actually happen.

      That said, I wholeheartedly agree with you. SARS is a big deal. I am personally not worried - my immune system seems to be reasonably strong, I'm not overly worried about fending off some random flue-like disease I come into casual contact with. But we were lucky this time, one just needs to look at the flu-like plagues of the past to see that the death toll could have been MUCH, MUCH higher - and next time, it may not be SARS but a bug that is a lot tougher, whether a mutation of SARS or something completely new.

      If anything, the SARS epidemic was scary simply because people did not take it serious, because it did take so long and so much pressure until certain government took effective action.

      And just listing the deaths doesn't even start to cover the whoe economic side of SARS, which must have caused damage of many billions of dollars world wide.

    3. Re:Are you people idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With this post you look "like a twit".

      Yes, SARS is dangerous but if you look behind the media hype that was about it, then you would see that about 10 times more people die every year of pneumonia and flu in USA alone! (Have a look at the statistics -> google.)

      Living in China, I saw the amount of panic which certainly killed more people than SARS due to the missing medical treatment for other illnesses at the time.

      But I guess you still think everyone is an idiot who questions the media. Live happy in your own small world.

    4. Re:Are you people idiots? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That can mean 19-35 year olds have a 3% chance of death, but elderly could have something like 85-90% since their immune systems can't cope.


      And this is a bad thing? Sounds like a good way to ensure the future of social security.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Are you people idiots? by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I thought everyone here is a clueless fuckwit when it comes to anything except computers, turns out I was wrong.

    6. Re:Are you people idiots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Population control, baby.

  77. Re:robin hood? by SamNmaX · · Score: 1

    SARS spread as rapidly as the cold, and is more deadly than the normal flu and way more deadly than the cold. If it were allowed to spread (and this could still happen, I'm in Toronto and we just finished "ridding" ourselves of this for the second time) there could be millions of people dead from it. There is roughly a ~10% death rate... if it were to spread like a cold to hundreds of millions of people, we could have something as bad or worse than the flu epidemic. I don't mean to be a fear monger, but this isn't "nothing to worry about". If people weren't so vigilent about this we could have been in that situation by now.

  78. IRC Channel by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1
    Communication is of the essence for the prevention of the spread of diease.
    When is somebody going to set up an irc server here?

    irc://irc.who.int

    Could somebody near the centre of the action tell Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, or her Dr Jong-wook Lee, her replacement, about irc. A Slashcode server would not be a bad idea either.

    It might save quite a few lives one day.

  79. Re:robin hood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few loose-gun assholes like this one give American people very bad reputation outside.

    Yep, and when we put one in the White House it doesn't help either...

  80. SARS and Chinese politics by moncyb · · Score: 1

    Maybe gmajor was referring to the fact the Chinese government censored all information about SARS. If an infected people don't know they have a serious disease, they won't go to a hospital. If they don't go to a hospital, they won't be quarantined and will keep spreading the disease until they die.

  81. Well said... by Jowrandalpha · · Score: 1

    The measure of this 'virus' in the Canadian victims was 0%. Yes, that is ZERO PERCENT. When can a virus kill by its very absence? Answer: When 'experts' say it can.

  82. Disclaimer is not post-script (aka p.s.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does that dis or un claim the points made?

    It merely is an additional informational point appended on after (or "post") the main point.

    English is a well developed tool for communication, and can be used to craft the sublime and beautiful when thoughtfully wielded.

    Thoughtful users of English deserve information as needed to hone their skills; while careless thinkers and unthinking speakers who absorb and repeat strings of sounds with little to no parsing deserve nothing so much as to be left to the emptiness of their braying.

  83. This is old news by darkpurpleblob · · Score: 1

    I managed to contain SARS a few months ago.

    1. Re:This is old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you do it beneath the surface of a pond, in a plastic box with glove holes in the side?

  84. Re:3 men sitting at a gas station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M-O-O-N, that spells "Taco is Gay". Laws, Yes.

  85. As opposed to over consumption? by Epeeist · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > SARS could have very well been the answer to China's overpopulation issues.

    So what disease do we need to eliminate American overconsumption? ;-)

    1. Re:As opposed to over consumption? by KrunZ · · Score: 1

      Overweight.

    2. Re:As opposed to over consumption? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      How about some mandatory DRM, coupled with some copyright lawsuits, a helping of monopolistic practices, served with a side of consolidating media conglomerates? :)

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  86. Bio-w****n by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Actually, Toronto's response wasn't good enough. I was there. Their medical people and populace acted like a bunch of television zombies. (Cuz, you know, bad things only happen on TV). WAY too little, WAY too late. Typical Western day dreaming. "Nothing can topple this reality. It's so big and shiney! It will last forever and ever!"

    Sheesh.

    Now the fact that the West isn't reeling from a sweeping plague is interesting, isn't it? Very little was done differently here than in China, except here it all turned out okay, didn't it? Nothing bad ever really happens. Reality just keeps on tugging along, so there's no point in being too concerned. There's always a job in the morning and always a television at night.

    --The cause was Chinese spitting and bad sewage? Get real. While the Chinese may spit, and while their sewage systems may suck, (neither of which I am certain are entirely true. Never seen a Chinese spit in any media until now), it's still just PR spin doctoring. If doctors and nurses were dropping like flies and even WHO personell were dying. . , if people taking the right precautions, wearing the right plastic, washing their hands between patients, (and not spitting on the hospital floors). . , if these people were still getting sick, then Toronto should be a toxic plague zone right now.

    Have you seen the under-funded, over-strained Toronto public transit system on a hot day during rush hour? --I was there during the height of the SARS thing, and I can tell you first hand that there was some serious fluid exchange going on down there in those nasty tunnels. --And in those hermetically sealed work-places with too little air-cycling. Do you know how easily disease spreads? People get the flu for a reason. You can't stop shit like that; not after nearly three weeks of lax measures and people ignoring quarantine orders. People only started taking things seriously when it was essentially WAY too late. Disease vectors multiply geometrically, folks. You basically can't staunch those kinds of flows after more than ten days of unlimited spread.

    China needed military measures, mass panic and a near total shut-down of their economy to get things under some semblance of control. But Toronto, day-dreaming through the whole event with little more than some newscasts showing ambulance drivers wearing plastic suits to make people think that 'Something Was Being Done', was able to stop SARS cold after three weeks of doing virtually nothing? Give Me A Break.

    Toronto should be a big red glowing dot on some military map right now, and it would be if somebody hadn't stepped in.

    Can you say, "Friendly Fire"?

    They don't make 'em if they can't cure 'em. (Man, and when they finally piss off China enough, the ant will be stamped by the elephant. I'm willing to bet that the US military doesn't have enough bullets for every Chinese. Do you have any idea how big the standing army is in China? --Before a draft?)

    Too bad it's all a stage production. The masters of China and the masters of the US are the same. It's all a light show, folks! And SARS, (in the West, anyway), was Hamlet fumbling his lines. But the audience doesn't care. Nobody knows their Shakespear anymore.

    Of course, I'm just a crank. I don't know anything. Move along citizen.


    -FL

    1. Re:Bio-w****n by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      Could you have any less of a clue?

      Maybe you should talk to some health care workers about how "nothing was done". You know, the ones who put in countless hours + overtime working to contain an unknown disease. They put themselves & their families at risk day after day for whiney little bitches like you. You should be grateful.

      --
      - Toby
  87. Skeptics ? by winston_pr · · Score: 1

    I found this: SARS Scam the other day linked from a skepticism site... Now, this very article is probably all groundless wild speculation (especially as the author of the artcile also has a webshop with HERBAL pills that will heal just about anything), but it would be interesting to ponder if even on a fictional level, how diseases released at certain times, could help shift peoples focus away from other world-events. And also as a mass-psychological behavioural experiment.

    --
    "6EQUJ5"
  88. Re:robin hood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it were to spread a little faster than it did in Toronto only a small potion of those infected would even be able to get treatment.

    Combine that with the fact many of the 'recovered' patients haven't. They may no longer have SARS but some of them will remain on resperators for weeks; a few possibly for years.

    I'm still disgusted at how they reported the statistics.

    I overheard an H.R. director talk about how much of a waste it was and how SARS was no worse than the flu, etc. I don't think he realized that if SARS infected the employees at his company they could have expected a 10% mortality rate followed by another few percent (unknown) unable to return to work for weeks/months. FOr his position I found his attitude and ignorance disgusting.

  89. We Need More Armchair Analysis! by Apostata · · Score: 1

    You just know that the whole tone of this thread would be dramatically different if SARS had hit even the smallest populated area in the U.S. (aside from Alaska or Puerto Rico, I fear).

    Hell, to many readers, we might as well be talking about an obscure strain of malaria on a small South Pacific island six years ago.

    SARS is reality, and reality does not discriminate on the basis of national borders.

    I live in Toronto, and yes the media made an absolute feast out of this f*cker. However, while the impact of SARS itself may not be evident, the public clearly understands what it is like to effectively be quarantined from the rest of the world, simply because they live in a particular city (of 3 million others).

    I guess what I'm saying is this: when you see news reports about disease/violence that takes place Far Away On the Other Side of The World, take the hype with a grain of salt, but never forget that it's only a matter of time before you will be in that very same scenario. Don't treat it as something you are immune to, and don't ignore the psychological/sociological horrors that those people are experiencing.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  90. now they can make the docu-drama by juicy_lizard · · Score: 1

    I can just see the movie based on the SARS outbreak: Dustin Hoffman argues with his superior officer: "But, sir, we cannot bomb Toronto! The conservative government has finally taken its head out of its ass and is doing something about the problem!"

  91. Re:southpark quote... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    "Decimation of the european continent" would imply that 10% of Europeans died. And actually, it was more like 30%. But the confusion here is between the mortality rate and the infection rate -- with the black plague, IIRC, slightly less than half the population was infected, and somewhat more than half of those infected died, leading to the 30% figure. If the plague had killed off 90% of Europeans alive at the time, we'd all be speaking Arabic now, a la The Years of Rice and Salt.

    There's a good argument that Europe was terribly overpopulated, and the plague killed just the right number to reduce the strain on available resources and spark the Renaissance. Of course, that's easy for us to say, blithely, looking back across the centuries. Sucked at the time. <1/2 g>

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  92. So the CDC and WHO are just scaring people? by JohnDenver · · Score: 1

    We all know the media loves to scare people by infered exageration, using "creative editing" where it would seem like everybody in Toronto is wearing a mask when the opposite was really true.

    No one (except for the media) is asking you to panic. Rather, I would expect you to spread facts about SARS rather than dismissive conjecture by disproportionately comparing it to the flu and pneumonia.

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  93. Utilitarian Ethics by JohnDenver · · Score: 1

    ...was the backbone of the Third Reich.

    I would love to see how you would have performed under Milgram's experiment.

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
    1. Re:Utilitarian Ethics by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I would love to see how you would have performed under Milgram's experiment.

      Me too, but unfortunatly, I would recognize it and be biased due to that fact.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  94. China == Communists == untrustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The recent deluge of "sars is over" news articles does not fit with the fact that China covered up sars for several years.

    These articles are pr to prevent the Asian economies from collapsing due to the lack of international travel and trade.

  95. SARS & Y2K by Scarblac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You guys remind of the people who say that the whole uproar over Y2K wasn't necessary. Nothing happened, so that proves the whole prevention effort was unnecessary, right? All overblown hype!

    But a lot of stuff was actually fixed. There would have been problems if it hadn't been attacked like that. Of course the media was too sensationalistic about it, but Y2K was a problem, or at least it could have been.

    SARS turned out not to be that big of a problem. There was a huge containment effort and much media hype. People keep pointing out that the flu kills many more people.

    So what do they suggest should have been done? Just give them anti biotics and see what happens? The reason SARS was not such a huge problem at the end is precisely because of the huge containment effort. What if SARS had been allowed to spread so that it had affected just 1% of the people who get flu every year? Major disaster, and by that time it would have been impossible to contain.

    I think WHO did exactly the right thing, especially since so little was known about the virus. Most diseases take centuries to wipe out, we actually managed to contain SARS before it became widespread! Sounds to me that's exactly what we have organizations like the WHO for, and it actually worked.

    Of course the media hype meant that the economy was hurt more than it had to be. It wasn't perfect. But I think we can be pretty happy, overall.

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  96. Very Young Are Immune! by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Actually there's significant evidence that West Nile poses no threat to children. Some health officials in Ontario have gone so far as to hint* that intentionally exposing children to the virus will give them an immunity later in life when infection could have negative consequences. To date, an 18-year-old is the youngest fatality in Canada and very few children have come down with any symptoms at all.

    * They can't actually recommend this for fear of lawsuits. :(

  97. ZERO PERCENT by Jowrandalpha · · Score: 0

    Frank Plummer, director of research at the WHO laboratory in Canada, stated in his last report on the subject that he was finding the virus in 0% of all SARS cases.

    If the virus is not there then theses SARS cases are the result of other causes. In the old days an MD would actually make a diagnosis of each patient's condition in order to offer them the correct treatment for their illness. Nowadays they just tell everyone who comes into their shop with a runny nose that they have the latest virus.

    Now, the fact that people are dying does not mean that they are dying of some virus, even if WHO asserts that it must.

    If you drink raw sewage you will get ill.

    If you starve yourself you will get ill.

    If you take toxic chemicals for prolonged periods of time you will get ill.

    If you do not take care of your immune system you will get ill.

    If you come into contact with a concentration of a particular virus you will most likely get ill.

    If you have 0% of this virus inside your body, and you are ill, then the virus is not the cause.

  98. Good, the hype machine cna stop now by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    Look: SARS is less contaigous that influenza. It was contracted by fewer people and had killed a lot fewer people than the flu does every year.

    WHY has sars been the lead story for so many months when Influenza has a much more damaging impact on the world health every year than this infection called SARS?

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  99. Bio-weapons testing by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Make sure the seals on the building you use for bio-weapon testing are solid.

    We don't use seals, they're just not smart enough, and every time the French guys start talking about them, the English guys start laughing. It's just too hard to get anything done with seals in Canada as long as the government continues to mandate a bilingual top-secret workforce.

    We do use Dolphins, though. And they're solid; hell, they're built like brick shit houses! Members of the elite Dolphin Guard even have special filters covering their blow holes. (Previously, two Dolphin Guards were compromised by delayed-trigger grenades which were set to detonate when the guards got close to sensitive areas).

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  100. SARS Contained. In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The War in Eurasia is over, declared our Great Leader.

    etc.

    Fuck the Media.

  101. Yes SARS was overhyped by quantaman · · Score: 1

    Like Y2K

    --
    I stole this Sig
  102. Yep It's contained by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    I finally caught it

  103. Re:robin hood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would the popular kids care what the unpopular ones opinions were? pecking order.

  104. Re:southpark quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope to blithely look forward to a similar occurance when all the baby boomers retire enmasse. Them or us; because if they don't die off, the smaller younger working population trying to support their retired asses will be unsuccessful, simple math, there's too many of 'em, which will wipe everyone out anyway. That or we shluff the problem off to our kids & grandkids by going into more debt like the boomers did to avoid paying for their parents retirement. Now you know what kids are good for, to pay for your retirement! There is no savings.

  105. Ohhh, so sorry. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should talk to some health care workers about how "nothing was done". You know, the ones who put in countless hours + overtime working to contain an unknown disease. They put themselves & their families at risk day after day for whiney little bitches like you. You should be grateful.


    Hm. So included in that "A for Effort" would also be quarentine orders regularly ignored by health care professionals during the first two weeks? --And SARS carriers being sent home because the doctors didn't believe that patient conditions were anything more than common cold symptoms?

    Look, I realize that the medical community did get serious, and that they worked diligently with the information they had available. But I'm sorry. It was too little, too late, even for them. --You have to remember, that when things like this spin out of control, which it did, the powers that be have to create a convincing illusion, not just for the public, but also for the workers within the infrastructure. They did a pretty good job, too.

    So, do you actually know any health care workers? What did you hear?

    I'll share if you do.


    -FL

    1. Re:Ohhh, so sorry. by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      Yes all the nurses that were interviewed were plants. It's all a big gov't conspiracy. They also faked the moon landing.

      o.0

      --
      - Toby
    2. Re:Ohhh, so sorry. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Yes all the nurses that were interviewed were plants. It's all a big gov't conspiracy. They also faked the moon landing.

      Don't be foolish.

      Of course all the nurses that were interviewed were not plants.

      But are you trying to suggest that conspiracies don't exsit? That's moronic. You're appear to be another casualty of the social programming which has nulled the word "conspiracy" to the point where people don't believe in it regardless of any rationality. Here's what I like to do for people who are so programmed. . .

      Instead of saying "Conspiracy," try using instead the word, "Corruption".

      They're basically the same thing. Do you not believe in Government Corruption either? Are people who complain about corruption all cranks and weirdos who should be shunned and disbelieved on principal?

      I'll let you chew on that. Let's see if you have the balls to examine this bit of programming within you and de-bug it like a man, rather than lull yourself back to sleep by telling yourself comfy lies like, "I'm right and that creepy poster is just some internet crank." --That is, stick with the prvailing concensus because it's easier and more comfortable to go with the crowd than to think for yourself. Being ostricised by a bunch of weaklings is far, far worse than being a dupe.

      Pathetic.


      -FL

    3. Re:Ohhh, so sorry. by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      Yes I am suggesting conspiracies don't exist.

      I wrote it on your monitor in invisible ink.

      If you use the magic elixer you can uncover the secret message.

      Scrub harder, you'll find it eventually!

      Fucknut.

      --
      - Toby
  106. Re:robin hood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen! Americans are on top of the world wide food chain and like we say to every other whiny country that doesn't like it: fucking deal with it, losers.

  107. another $135 million dollar fiasco by captapathy · · Score: 1

    This seems very similar to the extreme reaction to Legionairre's disease. This fiasco cost the U.S. millions trying to create a vaccine for a disease that was worse in the fantasy news world than it was in reality. I can't wait until they spend millions on SARS drugs that are rendered useless by a single gene mutation. I personally, would rather take my chances on the current form of SARS, than a fitter, stronger virus.

  108. Or when the WHO... by Jowrandalpha · · Score: 0

    said that small-pox had been eradicated from Africa, by renaming it monkey-pox. Or when they say that the people of Africa are dying of a virus, and giving them drugs instead of food.

  109. Anyone know about the collaboration by MrBlic · · Score: 1
    What I want to know is: What software / hardware did they use to provide the collaboration? Does anyone know?

    In a few articles, I've heard that the WHO and CDC established secure web sites to aid in the communication and collaboration. One was in the (paper) Technology Review from MIT. Another is Forbes here

    I've done about an hour of googling, and the only lead I've found is this:

    from: http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,3959,1161972 ,00.asp

    The federal government is prepared to spend $377 million on medical communications and surveillance improvements in fiscal 2003, according to President Bush's proposed budget. The CDC is linking its bio-terror preparedness funding grants to NEDSS-compliance.

    So far, all 50 states and large cities such as New York have received funding for the surveillance system, but the national rollout, is expected to take "several years," says Loontz.

    Under a pilot, Tennessee is using federal funds to replace its DOS-based system, with a NEDSS-based system with Microsoft SQL 2000 and BEA Systems WebLogic software running in the background.

    My guess is that the real webmasters behind the collaboration were using something like simple FTP sites, or Zope-like CMS for the collaboration.

    --
    Celebrate Excellence!
  110. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    Isn't the WHO a UN commission? So, why does anyone even listen to them? It's not like they help.

  111. Hm. How very convincing. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Yes I am suggesting conspiracies don't exist. [. . .] Fucknut.

    Hm. I provide a thoughtful post with some valid points, and you respond with unthinking rudeness.

    This clears up a great deal regarding the intelligence level of your initial post. That is, you seem to have no brain. But perhaps I am speeding to a conclusion too quickly. Let's see if you can answer the following. . .

    Upon what exactly do you base your belief that people never conspire to keep damaging data from the public? Could you please provide a link or something? Or is it purely intuition upon which you base your complete faith in the Corporate management, Government workers and Organized crime of the world?


    -FL

  112. Re:Hm. How very convincing. by TobyWong · · Score: 1

    You are too funny.

    Fantastic Lad, the only one who has managed to figure it all out, shakes his head sadly as he looks at all the lemmings around him as they march on, enslaved in some great celestial prank.

    Do you often find yourself engaging in rants about "the man" and how he is screwing you over? Do you hide money inside your mattress for fear that the "guv'ment" will take it away from you?

    Do I need to spell it out for you any clearer? You are a paranoid loser! Now go put on your tinfoil hat like a good little freak before someone steals your thoughts.

    --
    - Toby
  113. Re:Hm. How very convincing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny, but your reaction is as much of a kneejerk as you make his out to be. And you wonder why both stereotypes have been ingrained so deeply the past 50 or so years.

  114. Re:Hm. How very convincing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gee look, an AC just happened to stumble across this old convo... what are the chances?

  115. Stereotypes and fear by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    It's funny, but your reaction is as much of a kneejerk as you make his out to be. And you wonder why both stereotypes have been ingrained so deeply the past 50 or so years.

    I think the part I like best is how when he thinks he is off the public record, all pretense of civility and rationality drop like a rock.

    Interestingly, I find that this brand of follower is fairly common. The primary fear/motivation in life to the exclusion of virtually all other considerations is to be accepted by the pack. They tend to be a mess when you delve more deeply, because s/he has spent most available energy on maintaining surface appearances, scrambling to keep up with common concensus and the hell away from anything which is publically scorned, regardless of logic. --Which, incidentally, is why they use ridicule with such force, i.e., the 'Tinfoil Hat' refrain ad nauseum; because they have a gut level fear of such tactics, (an ancient survival mechanism trumped up and deliberately induced early on through childhood trauma), they exist in a near permenant state of fear of being excluded. They have great difficulty conceiving why such tactics have virtually no effect on those who have managed to break free of that particular control mechanism.

    Consequently, it's very easy to sell lies to this sort; partly because they're so scrambled that they are entirely unable/unwilling to grasp that their thoughts might be regularly influenced by numerous outside sources, everything from the immediate media to seeds planted during childhood. (It takes forever to undo all of this programming in order to find oneself. Most people never even start! "I'm 100% me, baby! And my favorite soft drink is. . .") --So long as s/he perceives what direction the group concensus is pointing in, you can almost always gurantee a falling in line. These methods work exceptionally well.

    --Incidentally, if you look around, you will discover that I'm not actually a stereotypical example of anything. Honestly; when was the last time you ran across the 'conspiracy theorist' stereotype in anything other than a television show? --And before you answer too quickly, you should know that I am gainfully employed, well educated, bathe regularly, have many friends and am well respected in my community.

    Hmmm. . .


    -FL

    1. Re:Stereotypes and fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I was more thinking of the stereotypical way in which he perceived you, not necessarily labelling you myself as a stereotype (though obviously stereotypes are a label the brain sticks on everything it wants to categorize quickly). But then, that is, like you mentioned, imprinted behaviour; using stereotypes received from visual stimuli, like tv, and letting the brain apply it before it gets to think and consider. As I said, it goes for both sides, recognizing the stereotype in the other and in themselves, on an instinctive level. Nobody likes being pushed into a role after all.

    2. Re:Stereotypes and fear by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      Yep you are the only person not to fall for this great celestial ruse. /golfclap

      Your first mistake is thinking you are somehow more clever than your average person. Let me burst your bubble: you aren't.

      as for the public record comment, if you look at my posts you will note that I don't shy away from calling someone out (in this case you). If I think you are a dipshit I will say so. It doesn't matter if 1 person or 1 million people read it.

      --
      - Toby