When at work loading the corporate systemstack twice: one local XP system and one remote terminalserver session it takes a long 8 minutes before I am logged in. Funny thing is when using my own laptop it just takes a little more then 4 minutes to login at the terminalserver. Too bad that taking your own device with you has been marked as insecure.
are the costs involved with building and maintaining this system. Combined with privacy concerns, possible fraud and system failure makes an fuel tax much more preferable.
on their privacy policy. When you look at the original blogpost the only thing that changes is the misuse of your profile photo. Someone can still recall which person on your network is following the advertiser.
Sooner or later they will succeed in their attempt to lower substantly all illegal downloads. But it will backfire to them because many people will not have the means to discover new music and films other then those current massmedia shit on tv and radio. So in the end they will loose more then they do right now. Too bad that all our rights will have been revoked by then.
Same here, I use a Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit client and I had to install the Java-plugin by hand and disable the IcedTea plugin in FF but besides that everythings works fine with the Juniper applet.
I think the Unity project is going to go very badly for Canonical, but not Linux in general. KDE is still here and works pretty well in 4.6, and has never been the kind of DE to remove choices and options. I predict the KDE distros are going to pick up a lot of users soon.
I agree to that my current install is Ubuntu 10.04 and there will have to happen a lot before I try to install the Unity desktop. For my notebook I tried the dist-upgrade and it fucked up my 10.10 big time. So I removed it totally and installed Kubuntu which works perfectly. For my netbook I will try Xubuntu as a upgrade because of the less powerfull processor in it. I surely hope Canonical reconsiders their Unity policy.
At the moment there is nothing that fit that bill. At best you will get a shadow or underground system that will functioning concurrently with the current DNS-system. The impact will be too big for internet as a whole to kill off the current DNS-system imho.
because they can not really compete with Intel anymore. And Intel hardly punished for it's anti-competitive behaviour will laugh about it. Too bad but that will not change in the near future.
Our Philips P4500 did have the same 10M removable disk pack and you could really hear it when a heavy query was executed. Until one morning it sounded more like a Jumbo 747 and ended with a long squeek. I saved it for years but alas last time I moved there was really not enough room to store everything.
Slashdot Mirror
When at work loading the corporate systemstack twice: one local XP system and one remote terminalserver session it takes a long 8 minutes before I am logged in. Funny thing is when using my own laptop it just takes a little more then 4 minutes to login at the terminalserver. Too bad that taking your own device with you has been marked as insecure.
are the costs involved with building and maintaining this system. Combined with privacy concerns, possible fraud and system failure makes an fuel tax much more preferable.
on their privacy policy. When you look at the original blogpost the only thing that changes is the misuse of your profile photo. Someone can still recall which person on your network is following the advertiser.
Sooner or later they will succeed in their attempt to lower substantly all illegal downloads. But it will backfire to them because many people will not have the means to discover new music and films other then those current massmedia shit on tv and radio. So in the end they will loose more then they do right now. Too bad that all our rights will have been revoked by then.
Same here, I use a Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit client and I had to install the Java-plugin by hand and disable the IcedTea plugin in FF but besides that everythings works fine with the Juniper applet.
I think the Unity project is going to go very badly for Canonical, but not Linux in general. KDE is still here and works pretty well in 4.6, and has never been the kind of DE to remove choices and options. I predict the KDE distros are going to pick up a lot of users soon.
I agree to that my current install is Ubuntu 10.04 and there will have to happen a lot before I try to install the Unity desktop. For my notebook I tried the dist-upgrade and it fucked up my 10.10 big time. So I removed it totally and installed Kubuntu which works perfectly. For my netbook I will try Xubuntu as a upgrade because of the less powerfull processor in it. I surely hope Canonical reconsiders their Unity policy.
At the moment there is nothing that fit that bill. At best you will get a shadow or underground system that will functioning concurrently with the current DNS-system. The impact will be too big for internet as a whole to kill off the current DNS-system imho.
because they can not really compete with Intel anymore. And Intel hardly punished for it's anti-competitive behaviour will laugh about it. Too bad but that will not change in the near future.
Our Philips P4500 did have the same 10M removable disk pack and you could really hear it when a heavy query was executed. Until one morning it sounded more like a Jumbo 747 and ended with a long squeek. I saved it for years but alas last time I moved there was really not enough room to store everything.
Well after Win 3.1 Win95 Win98 Win CE Win NT Embedded NT: all louzy products who going to believe M$ anyway?