No, you miss the point (I don't see how, it's still right there on top of your coward head); the Christian fundamentalists who bombed abortion clinics targeted those they perceived were DOING wrong. They didn't target INNOCENT people, although sometimes innocent people get caught in the crossfire (Timothy McVeigh, for example). Islamic fundamentalists often TARGET innocent people specifically. It's in the same ballpark as persecuting the victims of rape.
(Just arguing your logic here)
In this case, the target was not perceived as innocent, they were seen as doing something wrong and immoral. Neither the children or the teachers would have been considered innocent by the poisoner.
Most of the time, any given hothead trying to use their religion as a weapon will write off innocents as a cost to the greater good. Be it a christian bombing an abortion clinic or a muslim bombing a nightclub. Their goal is the same: Enforce their interpretation of their religion's tenants on others. Collateral be damned.
Also, many a religion doesn't hold to the notion of innocence. It's hard to apply any logic where everyone is perpetually guilty.
This is because Bell is changing their billing structure to the wholesale customers, like my employer.
Bell is going to reduce our monthly bills per subscriber by 6-7$, but then introduce a capacity charge of $2200/100MB/month.
This comes in to play starting February 1st.
I'm moderately confident that if you compared commercial home ISPs to corporations and looked at the percentage of times that the "user of record" for an IP address according to the logs was the same as the actual person using it, that percentage would be higher for a corporation than for an ISP serving home users.
And I'm extremely confident that you're pulling that out of your ass. Looking at one of the hotbeds for P2P traffic, universities, most have hundreds, if not thousands of computers in labs available to any student who decides to walk in an plop themselves in front of a keyboard. Not to mention public kiosks, that free hotel wifi that let us sit on facebook while sitting in the cafe. And then companies that have dedicated terminals for specific applications (ie hooked up to specialized hardware ie in labs and such), and terminal server systems where it doesn't matter what computer you sit at because you RDP into the terminal server.
Most corporations hand out internal IPs via DHCP. Depending on the temperament of the Network Admin, those can range from 1hr leases to 3 days.
As a side note, no corporations nowadays would assign a publicly routable IP to a employees workstation anyway, much less record the generic traffic and IP assignments of DHCP for all their systems. An ISP, hell yes. A corporation? Not a chance.
So, how's logging all of that NAT traffic going for you Mr Haselton?
Slashdot Mirror
No, you miss the point (I don't see how, it's still right there on top of your coward head); the Christian fundamentalists who bombed abortion clinics targeted those they perceived were DOING wrong. They didn't target INNOCENT people, although sometimes innocent people get caught in the crossfire (Timothy McVeigh, for example). Islamic fundamentalists often TARGET innocent people specifically. It's in the same ballpark as persecuting the victims of rape.
(Just arguing your logic here)
In this case, the target was not perceived as innocent, they were seen as doing something wrong and immoral. Neither the children or the teachers would have been considered innocent by the poisoner.
Most of the time, any given hothead trying to use their religion as a weapon will write off innocents as a cost to the greater good. Be it a christian bombing an abortion clinic or a muslim bombing a nightclub. Their goal is the same: Enforce their interpretation of their religion's tenants on others. Collateral be damned.
Also, many a religion doesn't hold to the notion of innocence. It's hard to apply any logic where everyone is perpetually guilty.
This is because Bell is changing their billing structure to the wholesale customers, like my employer. Bell is going to reduce our monthly bills per subscriber by 6-7$, but then introduce a capacity charge of $2200/100MB/month. This comes in to play starting February 1st.
I'm moderately confident that if you compared commercial home ISPs to corporations and looked at the percentage of times that the "user of record" for an IP address according to the logs was the same as the actual person using it, that percentage would be higher for a corporation than for an ISP serving home users.
And I'm extremely confident that you're pulling that out of your ass. Looking at one of the hotbeds for P2P traffic, universities, most have hundreds, if not thousands of computers in labs available to any student who decides to walk in an plop themselves in front of a keyboard. Not to mention public kiosks, that free hotel wifi that let us sit on facebook while sitting in the cafe. And then companies that have dedicated terminals for specific applications (ie hooked up to specialized hardware ie in labs and such), and terminal server systems where it doesn't matter what computer you sit at because you RDP into the terminal server. Most corporations hand out internal IPs via DHCP. Depending on the temperament of the Network Admin, those can range from 1hr leases to 3 days. As a side note, no corporations nowadays would assign a publicly routable IP to a employees workstation anyway, much less record the generic traffic and IP assignments of DHCP for all their systems. An ISP, hell yes. A corporation? Not a chance. So, how's logging all of that NAT traffic going for you Mr Haselton?