1. Require a password and a private key file stored on computer to decrypt files (Two factor authentication)
2. Two sets of logins: One set of credentials is to your normal account, the other has a login/startup script that wipes the private key and DoD wipes the free space
3. When the NSA asks for your password, give them the wipe password
Congratulations, the NSA can beat you with a wrench all they want, it's not possible for you to give them the encryption key anymore.
I wouldn't have a choice if a judge (the UN in this analogy) decided there was reasonable evidence to issue a search warrant. Also, in the US it might also fall under the exigent circumstances clause which would allow the police to enter your home WITHOUT a search warrant (possible immediate harm, possible loss of evidence, etc).
Entirely possible - but here's something cool. I have Google for Your Domain setup for a personal domain. I just tested it, and I was able to send an email to: jon+test@[mydomain].com. Now there's no way for a spammer to know if Google is handling my mail (easily) so they'd have to assume that the + was a legitimate character. I mean, in theory, they could lookup the MX records and if they point to google, strip the +[characters up to]@ off, but I seriously doubt many, if any at all, would do this.
If it's running for 15 seconds maybe it's just putting an annoyingly high load on the server. Also consider that for every legitimate mail, you could be getting a lot of spam. I know I would be annoyed if my CPU load shot up randomly ever 5 or 10 minutes when a piece of spam came in.
You can also do this via gmail. Gmail will accept and deliver email to +@gmail.com and delivery it to you. Try it out.
So anytime you sign up for something, just use: postglock+slashdot@gmail.com. Then if you get spam, just look at the "To:" address, you can even write a filter based on the + sign in the "To:" field, if you wanted.
I don't have to. This is totally unnecessary. Your premise is that the US Govt hacked the NYT as an excuse to invade Syria. My point is: it doesn't matter who hacked the NYT, we're going to invade Syria anyway. So who cares?
I think your tin foil hat might be on a little too tight today.
That's a great point and something I don't think a lot of Europeans appreciate, the geographical size and income variance across the US. Using a cost of living calculator, living in NYC is 2x the price of living where I am now. Not 10% more, or even 50% -- it costs TWICE as much.
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say, but the best I can tell is you're confusing 1Gb/s service that epyT-R is referring to with 9GB total monthly bandwidth cap service you linked. These are two totally different measurements. The one you linked is 7Mb/s with a 9GB cap.
Two reasons:
1) It's not subsidized by the government via taxes.
2) The US is large and has a low population density, which makes it more expensive to deliver service.
The other thing I've wondered is, what is our cost relative income? We may pay more, but we make more -- but do we normalize based on per capita income?
Yeah I agree with you, generally speaking. 99% of consumers don't ever upgrade their OS, but just threw in that caveat because some will. And Enterprises will be the ones that are pushed onto Windows 8 by the EOL.
Have you tried using Win+R? If I need to run something with arguments, I just hit Win+R to bring up the run menu and do it there, never even have to see the start menu or metro ui. I actually don't know how you run commands with arguments via the startmenu?
Let me preface this by saying: I hate Windows 8. With that said, serious question - what's wrong with the metro screen? I use it just like the start menu, I press the windows key and start typing what I'm looking for. I think of it as a full screen start menu. I've always wondered, from a practical perspective, what the issue was?
It's really a simple strategy. Microsoft needed a way into the smartphone/tablet space. So, they push the same interface across all devices. Now slowly everyone will upgrade to Windows 8, either by buying new PCs as their's die, upgrading, using computers at work, etc. Then when they go to buy a phone or tablet, the interface is already familiar.
They basically don't give a shit if it's an inferior interface for the desktop, because they know people won't have a choice as Windows 7 goes EOL they'll be forced to use it.
I assume it's Globestar TLPS. It's a narrow range of frequency (10Mhz) in the upper 2.4Ghz range, for which Globestar has a nation wide license. It will supposedly be a new 802.11 service, not sure about compatibility with existing devices. Hopefully someone with more details can chime in.
Slashdot Mirror
Explain to me how they attach to my "PC 'end point'" on my linux workstation.
1. Require a password and a private key file stored on computer to decrypt files (Two factor authentication)
2. Two sets of logins: One set of credentials is to your normal account, the other has a login/startup script that wipes the private key and DoD wipes the free space
3. When the NSA asks for your password, give them the wipe password
Congratulations, the NSA can beat you with a wrench all they want, it's not possible for you to give them the encryption key anymore.
I wouldn't have a choice if a judge (the UN in this analogy) decided there was reasonable evidence to issue a search warrant. Also, in the US it might also fall under the exigent circumstances clause which would allow the police to enter your home WITHOUT a search warrant (possible immediate harm, possible loss of evidence, etc).
As soon as you provide data to back up your assertion then we can discount his. At least he brings something to the table.
Good at collecting an inheritance? Good at filling a suit and living on the receiving end of nepotism?
Doesn't work for me (Chrome Version 29.0.1547.57 m)
Those 13 root servers are made up of hundreds of servers which point to the gTLD servers.
Entirely possible - but here's something cool. I have Google for Your Domain setup for a personal domain. I just tested it, and I was able to send an email to: jon+test@[mydomain].com. Now there's no way for a spammer to know if Google is handling my mail (easily) so they'd have to assume that the + was a legitimate character. I mean, in theory, they could lookup the MX records and if they point to google, strip the +[characters up to]@ off, but I seriously doubt many, if any at all, would do this.
If it's running for 15 seconds maybe it's just putting an annoyingly high load on the server. Also consider that for every legitimate mail, you could be getting a lot of spam. I know I would be annoyed if my CPU load shot up randomly ever 5 or 10 minutes when a piece of spam came in.
sorry, replying to myself. First line should be been any email delivered to: name+any_string@gmail.com
You can also do this via gmail. Gmail will accept and deliver email to +@gmail.com and delivery it to you. Try it out.
So anytime you sign up for something, just use: postglock+slashdot@gmail.com. Then if you get spam, just look at the "To:" address, you can even write a filter based on the + sign in the "To:" field, if you wanted.
Can someone explain what the big O notation would be for this? I'm still trying to wrap my brain around big O notation.
I'd think it would be O(n^2) but that can't be right because it's two different sets of data (not N raised to itself). So is there even a: O(N^X)?
I'm assuming that for each mail message (outer loop) each RegEx is processed, which might be an incorrect assumption.
Bullshit.
I don't have to. This is totally unnecessary. Your premise is that the US Govt hacked the NYT as an excuse to invade Syria. My point is: it doesn't matter who hacked the NYT, we're going to invade Syria anyway. So who cares?
I think your tin foil hat might be on a little too tight today.
Because the US doesn't need hacking the NY Times as an excuse to invade Syria.
You're asking them to commit accounting fraud with you. Why would you think this is OK?
That's a great point and something I don't think a lot of Europeans appreciate, the geographical size and income variance across the US. Using a cost of living calculator, living in NYC is 2x the price of living where I am now. Not 10% more, or even 50% -- it costs TWICE as much.
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say, but the best I can tell is you're confusing 1Gb/s service that epyT-R is referring to with 9GB total monthly bandwidth cap service you linked. These are two totally different measurements. The one you linked is 7Mb/s with a 9GB cap.
Two reasons:
1) It's not subsidized by the government via taxes.
2) The US is large and has a low population density, which makes it more expensive to deliver service.
The other thing I've wondered is, what is our cost relative income? We may pay more, but we make more -- but do we normalize based on per capita income?
Yeah I agree with you, generally speaking. 99% of consumers don't ever upgrade their OS, but just threw in that caveat because some will. And Enterprises will be the ones that are pushed onto Windows 8 by the EOL.
Is this a joke? Obvious keyboard shortcuts is news? Is timothy senile?
Have you tried using Win+R? If I need to run something with arguments, I just hit Win+R to bring up the run menu and do it there, never even have to see the start menu or metro ui. I actually don't know how you run commands with arguments via the startmenu?
Let me preface this by saying: I hate Windows 8. With that said, serious question - what's wrong with the metro screen? I use it just like the start menu, I press the windows key and start typing what I'm looking for. I think of it as a full screen start menu. I've always wondered, from a practical perspective, what the issue was?
It's really a simple strategy. Microsoft needed a way into the smartphone/tablet space. So, they push the same interface across all devices. Now slowly everyone will upgrade to Windows 8, either by buying new PCs as their's die, upgrading, using computers at work, etc. Then when they go to buy a phone or tablet, the interface is already familiar.
They basically don't give a shit if it's an inferior interface for the desktop, because they know people won't have a choice as Windows 7 goes EOL they'll be forced to use it.
I assume it's Globestar TLPS. It's a narrow range of frequency (10Mhz) in the upper 2.4Ghz range, for which Globestar has a nation wide license. It will supposedly be a new 802.11 service, not sure about compatibility with existing devices. Hopefully someone with more details can chime in.