It also says Using anything other than plain ASCII text on websites or in e-mail is a guaranteed way of terminating your net account, Sherlock. Of course it's a fiction piece.
but apple really wanted the PR of having the computer cluster, and perhaps to list the revenue in 4Q2003.
so i can't blame them - looks like a fair deal.
You fool. Apple wanted the PR, so they forced the G5s down VT's collective throat. Yeah, right.
Why couldn't VT hold their horses?
Because they had a deadline to meet if they wanted to make that Top CPUs list.
It's what you get if you take a beige box, glue the monitor stand to the top, roundoff the corners and make it out of plastic.
Saying that the monitor stand is "glued" to the box suggests that it's static and immovable, which is hardly the case.
A radical design might be to put all the componets in individual small boxes, let them communicate by a wireless protocol and scatter the boxes around the room as paperweights, bookends, wedges under wobbly desks etc.
Very radical. I'm sure we all could use some more clutter in our rooms. Would you prefer to string power cords to each one of those boxes, or have them run on AA cells?
It's easy to criticize "boring" industrial design, but it's harder to suggest something that actually works.
Napster may be long dead, but the name and the ``kitty'' logo of the pioneer online music-swapping program could return to cyberspace before the year is out. Santa Clara-based Roxio Inc., which owns the rights to the Napster name, plans to shelve its current online music service, pressplay, and roll out Napster 2.0 by Christmas, Chris Gorog, Roxio's chairman and chief executive, told The Associated Press. [...]
Check out the full article. Yet another competitor to the iTMS.
I do think it was Engrish:
Is data transfer rate about which?
As a portable prayer, because it is necessary...
It also says Using anything other than plain ASCII text on websites or in e-mail is a guaranteed way of terminating your net account, Sherlock. Of course it's a fiction piece.
but apple really wanted the PR of having the computer cluster, and perhaps to list the revenue in 4Q2003. so i can't blame them - looks like a fair deal.
You fool. Apple wanted the PR, so they forced the G5s down VT's collective throat. Yeah, right.
Why couldn't VT hold their horses?
Because they had a deadline to meet if they wanted to make that Top CPUs list.
Sing along time!
"It's fun to play with the D.M.C.A."
Saying that the monitor stand is "glued" to the box suggests that it's static and immovable, which is hardly the case.
Very radical. I'm sure we all could use some more clutter in our rooms. Would you prefer to string power cords to each one of those boxes, or have them run on AA cells?
It's easy to criticize "boring" industrial design, but it's harder to suggest something that actually works.
Haven't you noticed? It's running Linux!
;)
37337 Eteet? How fitting.