The idea isn't new. but they don't need to put stuff in the sky, only project an image.
It may take a LOT of energy, but more than enough can be right at the doors of a nuclear powerplant.
It was invented on 60's (or 50's?) but the main problem would be ppl suing the gov for it. And also there could be tampering, ie. drawing a joint in the mouth of the president on campaign... Well, maybe that could get him some extra points, who knows;)
Gnutella is a non anonymous system Freenet sort of helps, but no crypto.
I wonder how long it'll take till someone hacks a better anonymous system. Say with rings of trust, and HEAVY crypto. Main work would be helping NOT to flood a client from MANY OC3 servers...:) (sort of slow start on n-to-1)
Then RIIA and MEtallica nd all of them can go to cry to their respective moms. }:)
yes, we all know Theo isn't what you call a PR guy;)
anyway, that guy has NO RELATION with current OpenSSH
He is doing ad of his competitor project
He does FUD
He won't give up the domain
what would you thing if OpenBSD project had "linux.org" and put ads of OpenBSD/FreeBSD there? And the excuse is to "prevent" linux monopolixing the free OS market!!!
They did put a SECOND advisory same night:) Actully the example perl code crashes any IIS w/ option pack 4;) It was late friday at work. They did this in less than an hour!
please post to misc@openbsd.org: 1) exact description of the hardware of the machine (cpu, mem, brand, HD, etc) 2) HOW u did the install (CD, ftp, etc) I'm pretty sure they'll help you. Alejo
OpenBSD's security audit was NOT applied to NetBSD AFAIK
Theo posted on bugtraq a couple of times about net/free securitybugs that where already fixed in OpenBSD. But hey I do respect other BSDs. They have their strengths too:
FreeBSD -> speed of light (say yahoo.com/cdrom.com) NetBSD -> more plataforms than any other else.
I've heard lots of times you took the BSD code and just cosmetically changed it. I did look at both and they do look too similar and BSD's was earlier. And also heard you are the guy to blame on some anti-posix function implementations.
In the sense YOU see Linux (as I think), it is W. Richard Stevens. But since he is a UNIX (not linux) writer, and he is very kernel+performance read-all-geek he does FUNDAMENTED critics to Linux.
But his books are really admired and read by the hacking community.
o Anycast address is not distinguishable from non-anycast, unicast addresses. o Anycast address can be assigned to multiple interfaces of multiple nodes. o Anycast address MUST NOT be assigned to an IPv6 host. It can be assigned to an IPv6 router only. o Anycast address MUST NOT be used in source address field in IPv6 header.
I believe you were talking about unicast IP addresses. Those are specially handy for mirrors, eg. say slashdot gets 80 mirrors around the world. They assign a unicast IP addr to www.slashdot.org, and assign that IP on every mirror. when a client wants to connect to it, he automagically is routed to the closer mirror. Kiss goodbye mirror lists:)
there aren't 2^32 host on the net. think about it again. Each subnet in the worls eats 2 for broadcast and network addr. Average subnet sddress usage below 50% statistically.
W. Richard Stevens in his book Unix Network Programming specifies all the needed steps to use sockets with ANY protocol supported by DNS. There's a lot of work there, just pick any util/app using AF_INET sockets.
IPv6 needs a huge addressing space for it's mobile host thingie. I would really like CISCO to support it, since they're the main obstacle. The problem arises when every network was planned IPv4 based. Just think a bit about firewalls!
Slashdot Mirror
It may take a LOT of energy, but more than enough can be right at the doors of a nuclear powerplant.
It was invented on 60's (or 50's?) but the main problem would be ppl suing the gov for it. And also there could be tampering, ie. drawing a joint in the mouth of the president on campaign... Well, maybe that could get him some extra points, who knows ;)
My $.02
And they won't ever get paid by any pirate-like distribution.
Boycott won't work.
That's not only the hard part. It says a PRIME, literally ;)
no "relatively" prime bullshit.
Forgot to add the idea of using UDP
with source IP spoofing !!!
Gnutella is a non anonymous system
:)
Freenet sort of helps, but no crypto.
I wonder how long it'll take till someone
hacks a better anonymous system.
Say with rings of trust, and HEAVY crypto.
Main work would be helping NOT to flood
a client from MANY OC3 servers...
(sort of slow start on n-to-1)
Then RIIA and MEtallica nd all of them can go
to cry to their respective moms. }:)
And stop there. Get "The Sparc Architecture Manual V9" and you'll see 100s of this things.
They did put a SECOND advisory same night :) Actully the example perl code crashes any IIS w/ option pack 4 ;) It was late friday at work. They did this in less than an hour!
Facts:
- IIS w/ option pack HAS a "backdoor" with "netscapeengeniersareweenies" (or something like that).
- It allows every user with access to read all other user's
.asp files. This seems not to be a bug! - I HAVE SEEN IT WORK.
- So as it is would affect mostly web-hosting companies
- BUT, Core-SDI's Gera and Beto have found a buffer overflow vulnerability.
- It lets ANYBODY on the internet to crash a IIS with mentioned option pack (called a DOS).
- It is demonstrated using a perl script posted on BUGTRAQ.
- It seems HIGLY POSSIBLE to use THIS buffer overflow for arbitrary remote code execution.
- I HAVE SEEN IT WORK.
- So as it is affect ALL IIS w/ option pack4 on the net!!!
Notes:please post to misc@openbsd.org: 1) exact description of the hardware of the machine (cpu, mem, brand, HD, etc) 2) HOW u did the install (CD, ftp, etc) I'm pretty sure they'll help you. Alejo
Theo posted on bugtraq a couple of times about net/free securitybugs that where already fixed in OpenBSD. But hey I do respect other BSDs. They have their strengths too:
FreeBSD -> speed of light (say yahoo.com/cdrom.com)
NetBSD -> more plataforms than any other else.
For workstation I like it best, for performance maybe FreeBSD, for extreme portability NetBSD.
FOR SECURITY OpenBSD
I've heard lots of times you took the BSD
code and just cosmetically changed it.
I did look at both and they do look too
similar and BSD's was earlier.
And also heard you are the guy to blame on
some anti-posix function implementations.
How much of that is true?
sort of auto-linking abusing the url.
Some moderators are sooo biased.
They even go against GNU!!!!
All this was one of the causes of me dropping
linux, and switching to OpenBSD
BTW they say *BSD instead of OpenBSD
when they are so specific about linux distros
it is W. Richard Stevens. But since he is
a UNIX (not linux) writer, and he is very
kernel+performance read-all-geek
he does FUNDAMENTED critics to Linux.
But his books are really admired and
read by the hacking community.
"Do me this for free, I'll take credit to my superiors/stockholders, and all the related profits..."
Yeah, RIGHT!!
Same editors of all those Linux "bibles" and "for idiots" sh1t.
I hope more jews there will change things. I hope the new isr4eli government does something about it.
Same as Firewall One stuff, they are so rude...
o Anycast address is not distinguishable from non-anycast, unicast addresses.
o Anycast address can be assigned to multiple interfaces of multiple nodes.
o Anycast address MUST NOT be assigned to an IPv6 host. It can be assigned to an IPv6 router only.
o Anycast address MUST NOT be used in source address field in IPv6 header.
therefore no tcp to them! forget the web example... here are some specs
W. Richard stevens provides a free implementation in his book Unix Network Programming. Source is available on the page
So 128 isn't that crazy, and it's a nice number.
go read . This is a long topic.
W. Richard Stevens in his book Unix Network Programming specifies all the needed steps to use sockets with ANY protocol supported by DNS. There's a lot of work there, just pick any util/app using AF_INET sockets.
IPv6 needs a huge addressing space for it's mobile host thingie. I would really like CISCO to support it, since they're the main obstacle. The problem arises when every network was planned IPv4 based. Just think a bit about firewalls!