Hi,
If you are really talking about multiple terrabytes of archiving and you are allowed to keep it online I would look at something like Isilon IQ 36NL or IQ 72NL Series. This gives you a redundant storage environment where you can store depending of the size of the cluster starting at 100TB up to Peta Bytes of storage. And it is affordable. These amounts of data are just to big to consider things like tape or blueray.
JHP
I think that RedHat is really doing something really good here.
The problem for RedHat might very well be that they are, at this very moment, losing money on the SCO claims. By attacking those claims in courd they are probebly hoping to stop the whole thing and by creating a fund they are probebly hoping that big compagnies like IBM can join them in the lawsuit and help them settle this once and for all.
Slashdot Mirror
Hi, If you are really talking about multiple terrabytes of archiving and you are allowed to keep it online I would look at something like Isilon IQ 36NL or IQ 72NL Series. This gives you a redundant storage environment where you can store depending of the size of the cluster starting at 100TB up to Peta Bytes of storage. And it is affordable. These amounts of data are just to big to consider things like tape or blueray. JHP
I think that RedHat is really doing something really good here. The problem for RedHat might very well be that they are, at this very moment, losing money on the SCO claims. By attacking those claims in courd they are probebly hoping to stop the whole thing and by creating a fund they are probebly hoping that big compagnies like IBM can join them in the lawsuit and help them settle this once and for all.