"Some environmental researchers questioned whether the particles under review were more akin to soot and other urban pollutants than manufactured nanomaterials, and whether the exposure levels used for those particulate studies made sense for nanomaterials. "
Are we talking about large scale risks like lung cancer here?
This had nothing to do with the security of of the operating system or the web server for that matter. It was only a security hole in one php script.
Agreed, there are many instances of people using existing/creating Perl and PHP scripts that end up being exploited, an example being redirect of output to overwrite existing content or write new content in the same directory. At the end of the day, if these scripts arent tested fully for these kind of flaws, the user on the server who puts the scripts up is their own security risk.
Re:GNAA Announces acquisition of SCO
on
Spray-On Computers
·
· Score: -1, Troll
1. try posting in the correct thread. its about something other than SCO
2. the posting contained derogatory material.
3. mirroring my view on the post against me will not work. (look at point 2)
4. if my reply invoked such a strong reaction that you cannot read it properly out of anger, i suggest perhaps you take some anger management course.
Re:GNAA Announces acquisition of SCO
on
Spray-On Computers
·
· Score: -1, Offtopic
Not funny.
also you may want to learn how to READ, this thread is about spray on computers, not your racist homophobic tendancies.
With this spray on technology being so small, will this have an effect on the reliability of the circuits this is going to be working in?
Also if this were to be used in whole circuits, wont this actually be more recycleably unfriendly as whole circuits would have to be replaced if they went dud? or would it be the other way around and be more beneficial as the waste material would be a lot smaller? I would have thought that this would also make circuits less user-serviceable.
Can't this apply to the RIAA? They already shutdown Napster... how can they still continue to claim damages after having been paid for them already? ~ryan just my.02 cents... yes thats.02 cents... its not worth much but its all I have
No, because of the situation with SCO and IBM, if they settle, the legalities between those two, which this was all about in the first place can go no further as a mutual agreement will have been made.
In the case of the RIAA and Napster, this was not a settlement between 2 parties, Napster were shut down for illegal criminal activities.
Has anyone come across an instance of the RIAA mistakenly handing out subpoena's to ISP's where the users have been distributing their own musical material? Or do they only go for their clients songs?
Seems a bit bulky doesn't it, i just get this picture of pensioners falling backwards because of the weight of this pack on their backs, flailing around like beetles.
Let the record companies deal with it, not the government of another country.
With the US governments track record, you'd have more chance finding a bacon sandwich at a jewish wedding.
The IBM counter suit I'm not sure about, there patent portfolio is a weapon that could just as easily be turned on us.
Unlikely, they aren't stupid, they've seen what kind of damage has been done to SCO with their underhand tactics, they aren't going to do a lemming jump off the face of the earth like SCO.
Slashdot Mirror
If you believe the utter bollocks The Sun comes out with, you may as well pay $699 for a SCO Liecense.
"Some environmental researchers questioned whether the particles under review were more akin to soot and other urban pollutants than manufactured nanomaterials, and whether the exposure levels used for those particulate studies made sense for nanomaterials. "
Are we talking about large scale risks like lung cancer here?
Also EL34's are widely used in lots of Marshall guitar amps power amp stage, also 6L6's in old fenders and Peavey's.
This had nothing to do with the security of of the operating system or the web server for that matter. It was only a security hole in one php script.
Agreed, there are many instances of people using existing/creating Perl and PHP scripts that end up being exploited, an example being redirect of output to overwrite existing content or write new content in the same directory. At the end of the day, if these scripts arent tested fully for these kind of flaws, the user on the server who puts the scripts up is their own security risk.
Its good to know my tv licence which funds the BBC is going to go to more good use.
pah :(
1. try posting in the correct thread. its about something other than SCO
2. the posting contained derogatory material.
3. mirroring my view on the post against me will not work. (look at point 2)
4. if my reply invoked such a strong reaction that you cannot read it properly out of anger, i suggest perhaps you take some anger management course.
Not funny.
also you may want to learn how to READ, this thread is about spray on computers, not your racist homophobic tendancies.
With this spray on technology being so small, will this have an effect on the reliability of the circuits this is going to be working in?
Also if this were to be used in whole circuits, wont this actually be more recycleably unfriendly as whole circuits would have to be replaced if they went dud? or would it be the other way around and be more beneficial as the waste material would be a lot smaller?
I would have thought that this would also make circuits less user-serviceable.
Perhaps you should learn to spell.
Can't this apply to the RIAA? They already shutdown Napster ... how can they still continue to claim damages after having been paid for them already? ~ryan just my .02 cents ... yes thats .02 cents ... its not worth much but its all I have
No, because of the situation with SCO and IBM, if they settle, the legalities between those two, which this was all about in the first place can go no further as a mutual agreement will have been made.
In the case of the RIAA and Napster, this was not a settlement between 2 parties, Napster were shut down for illegal criminal activities.
Darl, we love you, i want to have your babies.
Has anyone come across an instance of the RIAA mistakenly handing out subpoena's to ISP's where the users have been distributing their own musical material? Or do they only go for their clients songs?
Seems a bit bulky doesn't it, i just get this picture of pensioners falling backwards because of the weight of this pack on their backs, flailing around like beetles.
Let the record companies deal with it, not the government of another country.
With the US governments track record, you'd have more chance finding a bacon sandwich at a jewish wedding.
Whats this, Slashdot moderators have a singular wit? wtf was wrong with that for -1??
Does this mean people will be wearing tin foil suits as well as tin foil hats now?
Just a question really, would spyware constitute being illegal in the UK under the data protection act or computer misuse act?
Actually, its already been reported to be Victoria Beckham
I wonder if his real name is "Homer"
What else is it going to be able to do apart from still be able to wriggle around after an injury?
sounds like a SCO lawyer.
I see a cheech and chong gag morphing here...
"up in SCO...thats where my money goes..."
I wonder if he has actually read linus's reply reply, i should imagine he'd have a face like a bag of spanners (when he does |if he has)
Do you think their slides were written by the same people who wrote the UK dossier on Iraq?
The IBM counter suit I'm not sure about, there patent portfolio is a weapon that could just as easily be turned on us.
Unlikely, they aren't stupid, they've seen what kind of damage has been done to SCO with their underhand tactics, they aren't going to do a lemming jump off the face of the earth like SCO.