Slashdot Mirror


Australian Court Doubles CD Importers' Fines

anti-fsck writes "Australia's Full Federal Court today upheld a lower court's decision that music labels Warner Music and Universal Music had engaged in anti-competitive practices in the .au CD market by threatening retailers who imported cheaper CDs. The court also doubled the labels' fine - and the fines for senior label executives - to more than $A2 million. w00, cheap CDs at last? Now if we can only get US-zoned DVDs legalised as well ..." Another reader notes that the U.S. government is busy trying to get Australia to change its laws to increase the profits of U.S. record companies.

258 comments

  1. Pananorth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Everyone, come to the land of Panaeast

  2. Can they really.... by loserbert · · Score: 1

    fine the execs personally too? I thought in a corporation the people weren't held accountable for the corporation.

    1. Re:Can they really.... by rokzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IANAL, but executives can be held accountable, e.g. corporate manslaughter where AFAIK bosses can be held personally accountable for unsafe working conditions.

      google'd:
      http://www.mhcinternational.com/corpo rate_manslaug hter.htm

      CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER

      There is nothing new in the notion that industry and commerce have had hands in the deaths of customers, employees and their neighbours. Regardless of whether the reasons were driven by negligence or by incompetence, the net effect was that next to never were companies or their top managers held accountable by the courts.

      Changes may well be on the way. The UK Government (May 2000) is now in consultation about the size and shape of corporate manslaughter or corporate killing charges. Prospectively unlimited fines are in view. There may be prison sentences for culpable directors. And the field of vision will cover all enterprises, to include public sector organizations, rather than the private sector only.

      Enactment of legislation will take many months. The implications are clear even now. In addition to the moral responsibility which ought always to have been present, there are legal, cost and reputation reasons why managers should take action.

      'Turnbull' requirements are already focussing attention on internal controls within the organization. Social audit and social reporting skills are increasingly needed by top managers. Above all, organizations will do well to look again at their values and their codes of conduct, whilst making sure that the needed educational processes are in place and working.

    2. Re:Can they really.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we really have to go through this every time? Oh, O.K then...

      That only applies to the U.S and a few other places. This is not a story about the United States, it is a story about Australia. Evidently in Australia, the executive can be held personally accountable for their actions.

    3. Re:Can they really.... by RCO · · Score: 1

      I think those times are coming to an end after things like Enron. Now maybe the execs will start really earning their pay by making sure the company is doing what it is supposed to be doing. ;-)

      --
      'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
    4. Re:Can they really.... by Cmdrx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a lawyer. At least as far as US law goes, if it can be shown that the execs acted in a deliberately illegal way and used the corporation to hide that activity, then the "corporate veil" can be pierced. This would open the door to all sorts of measures directly against the holdings of the individuals involved. The hard part seems to be proving that intentional illegal activity was taking place.

      --
      I could write something witty for my sig, but instead wrote this...
    5. Re:Can they really.... by loserbert · · Score: 1

      Good, maybe my gov't will get a clue and start holding the coporations accountable too...

    6. Re:Can they really.... by mvpll · · Score: 1

      Yes, they can be fined.
      Yes, they can buy "Directors Insurance", which means they don't personally pay those fines anyway...

    7. Re:Can they really.... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

      In the United States of Avarice, evil execs are protected by the artificial entity the hide behind: A corporation. THey usually get away with anything. Ken Lay of Enron is still a free man, as are Bernie Ebbers and Scott Sullivan of Worldcom. Australia, on the other hand, holds execs accountable. After all, they committed these misdeeds. Hooray for Australia!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    8. Re:Can they really.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Do you really think the execs know everything what's going on in the company.

      It's just juvenile (like any revenge is) to go after individuals and ruin their lives just because their employees were less than honest.

    9. Re:Can they really.... by wagemonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm not whining, but really, why is this flamebait?

    10. Re:Can they really.... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      I think in this case, the Australian courts knew exactly who was responsible, and dealt with them appropriately. With some detective work, identifying the individuals responsible for corporate misdeeds is possible. Knowing what's going on in the company is an executive's job, and you don't think for a second that Ken Lay, Bernie Ebbers, and Scott Sullivan were innocent, do you? Everything that happened at Enron and Worldcom was done on their orders.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    11. Re:Can they really.... by Chexsum · · Score: 0

      I guess this is why people run away to Majorca? :)

      --
      Pixels keep you awake!
    12. Re:Can they really.... by Mjec · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but executives can be held accountable, e.g. corporate manslaughter where AFAIK bosses can be held personally accountable for unsafe working conditions.

      IANAL either, but I think that's more about negligance. However, executives under Australian law have limited liability - which means you can't take everything from them. However, this liability is limited to (au)$7m. I think.

      --
      "But everyone should know everything." -markab
  3. Re:Oh my! by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 0, Funny
    2 million Australian dollars... that's like $17 US dollars!

    No, $A2 million dollars = 162 million dollars :P

  4. The real story? by henbane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think what this really should have mentioned more prominently is the second story. Talk about imperialist running dogs of the capitalist pig regime. - "Hey there, want a trade agreement? Not unless you bow down and worship the god of copyright exactly like we do"

    1. Re:The real story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did you read the article? Thought not.

      Under heavy lobbying from the US entertainment and software industries, the Office of the US Trade Representative had listed the harmonisation of copyright legislation among issues to be raised with Australian negotiators for the Free Trade Agreement. But the head of the US Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration, Undersecretary Grant Aldonas, said America would not be pushing too hard on intellectual property during the current negotiations.

    2. Re:The real story? by phuqwit · · Score: 1
      "Hey there, want a trade agreement? Not unless you bow down and worship the god of copyright exactly like we do"
      What I find interesting is that part of the trade agreements is to agree to uphold each others copyrights and the fact that the USA has eased up on the requirements for getting a copyright. This would only serve to bring more revenue to the USA in the long run.
    3. Re:The real story? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      Hey there, want a trade agreement? Not unless you bow down and worship the god of copyright exactly like we do

      So?

      If you don't like the terms, nobody's forcing you to close the deal.

    4. Re:The real story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if you don't like it, you can just be a third world country or in front of our guns. No one is forcing you.

    5. Re:The real story? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      Something's already fundamentally wrong with a first world country if it suddenly turns into a third world country when all contact with the USA is severed.

      As far as the guns go, I'm sure you don't believe in that scenario yourself.

    6. Re:The real story? by nodrama · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you read the article (or just the 1st sentence)? Thought not.

      "Under heavy lobbying from the US entertainment and software industries"

      "The US Trade Representative warned parallel importation had led to increasing piracy of DVDs and VCDs."

      "The report also highlighted the "relatively low priority" assigned by Australian state and federal police to the enforcement of copyright law"

      "He said getting an immediate agreement in place on intellectual property "might be a bridge too far". "

      Last sentence: "The Australian Government is reviewing the 2001 Digital Agenda legislation."

    7. Re:The real story? by Troed · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Not "severed" - it's "bombed".

      There has never been a more trigger happy country than the US. What is it Eminem says again .. "Divided States of Embarrasment" ..

    8. Re:The real story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I read the whole thing.

      Would the US like to make Australia change their laws? Yup.

      Is that what they're "busy doing"? Not right now.

      Get over yourself, doofus

    9. Re:The real story? by sirbone · · Score: 1

      >Talk about imperialist running dogs of the capitalist pig regime.

      These "running dogs" you refer to (I believe a reference to Mao's description of capitalists if I recall his writings correctly) are not capitalist pigs, for that assumes we are a capitalist society. Capitalism is the only economic system consistent with human rights. In its pure form, you have individuals peacefully trading the fruits of their labour with other individuals so that all parties may have a mutual benefit. Obviously that is not what we have today, where "power-elite" control things trhough force for their own gain, typically legislative force such as tariffs, subsidies, etc. So rather than criticize these "capitalist pigs", perhaps a better criticism would be to refer to them as "statist pigs" or "mercantilist pigs", for American society is not capitalist nor are people avouching for the managed trade of the WTO and other global arrangements, which are not actually capitalistic free trade despite what they call it. America is a mix of mercentilism (economic intervention to redistribute wealth to the hands of the rich when the rich vote the mercantilists into office) and socialism (economic intervention to redistribute wealth to the hands of the poor when the poor vote the socialists into office).

      So a better way to put it would be, "Talk about imperialist running dogs of the mercantilist pig regime." To which the answer is not the subtle reference to Mao's communism, for that is also just statist control over trade, exactly like the mercantilists being denounced as pigs.

      --
      "The State is that great fiction by which everyone lives at the expense of everyone else." -Frederic Bastiat.
    10. Re:The real story? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 0
      And how many countries has the USA bombed in Europe recently to gain a financial advantage? How about Asia? Australia?

      Don't be a tool to the euro federalists (US neocons) who keep whipping up the anti-American (anti-European) sentiment just to boost their own federalist/neo-colonialist ambitions. Stop spouting blind anti-American crap and look at the hard facts.

    11. Re:The real story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me feels like it is time once more to recommend a good book...

    12. Re:The real story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      eminem

      Anyone who quotes that moron in the context of world politics has just about lost his/her credibility.

    13. Re:The real story? by Troed · · Score: 1

      Why did you leave South America out?

      If you want hard facts I'm all too well prepared to deliver a bunch :) I'm refusing to accept work in the USA since a while back. I do not support a regime without respect for human values or democracy.

      (When it comes to Europe the USA has, like the article says about Australia, already forced a lot of laws through with threats of trade sanctions)

    14. Re:The real story? by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      er, why the European slant?

      The US seems to like the muck and bullets when it comes to the non-European theatre.

      try asking the people left in Korea, Vietnam & Nicaragua

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    15. Re:The real story? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      Why did you leave South America out?

      Because there is no point in getting into a pissing contest about which country in the world has the most atrocities in its history. Just a hint: it's not the USA but the empire-building, slave-trading Old World.

      I'd rather ask you this: what should the Americans (the people, since you seem to be blatantly anti-American and not just anti-USA) do to get clean on your list?

      threats of trade sanctions

      Which I suppose you think is outside the rights of a sovereign nation?

    16. Re:The real story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is sirbone Ann Coulter or Ann Rand?

      Vote now! Call:

      • 1-900-123-0000 if you think sirbone is Ann Coulter
      • 1-900-123-0001 if you think sirbone is Ann Rand
      • 1-900-123-0002 if you think sirbone is some other ideologically blinkered individual
      We'll announce the results at the end of the show. So vote now, let your voice be heard!

      * Calls cost $50. You must be over 18 and have a sense of humor to vote in this context. No refunds allowed. To participate by mail, please send your vote to SIRBONE VOTE, PO BOX 8192, 06053-8192. For a complete list of terms and conditions, please send a stamped address envelope to the above list. You must equate the use of capital to invest in new enterprises and grow existing ones with freedom to participate in this poll, or have another opinion, or none at all.

    17. Re:The real story? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This bickering has been going on for years now, and it seems to most of us that even if the recording companies do finally get bitch-slapped in the highest courts, they will find a way of keeping prices up.

      Given that the Australian Federal government has a long record of rolling over to corporate interests, I can't see them upholding the rights of the man in the street, somehow.

      Pretty well summed up by that nice quote from Maynard Keynes to the effect that "capitalism is the absurd belief that the worst of men, for the worst of reasons, will somehow work for the benefit of us all".

    18. Re:The real story? by Troed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So, to recap. You left South America out since that would prove my point.

      The people of america should maybe start by raising their collective intelligence. 70% of all americans thought that Iraq had something to do with Sept 11. To me that says that the majority of the american population are ignorant fools.

    19. Re:The real story? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      So, to recap. You left South America out since that would prove my point.

      And you refused to accept/comment on my claim that the USA has not embarked on more military campaigns to secure financial gains than any large European nation has in its past. Why aren't you attacking the French for their rather nasty colonial past in Africa (or the Brits for that matter) or their more recent and still on-going profitable deals with various dictators and totalitarian governments? Or, if you insist on dealing with the past, how do you feel about your own country's shady armsdeals with the apartheid South Africa and India in the 80s? I bet you didn't know about those or then you've just too blinded by your ideology.

      You aren't attacking these countries because it is easy and fashionable to bash the USA. You also clearly have some idealistic chip on your shoulder that makes you think that the USA is the primary cause of most of the suffering in the world.

      The people of america should maybe start by raising their collective intelligence. 70% of all americans thought that Iraq had something to do with Sept 11.

      And you can judge a nationful of people based on what you see and hear on your media? You can judge a nation and a government but you cannot judge people you've never met. Yet, in your previous post you state that you don't even want to get to know Americans first hand. You know what that is? Bigotry. Good old fashioned bigotry bordering on xenophobia and outright racism.

    20. Re:The real story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? We left some? Oh my fucking christ we have to go back there.

    21. Re:The real story? by Troed · · Score: 1

      Oh please. If you think I haven't attacked my own country (Sweden) numerous times you're just being silly. Of course I have, and of course I know about what my own country has done. We even broke our own laws by exporting arms to the USA when the USA was involed in an illegal war against Iraq lately, you know.

      I judge americans on their actions and views. Are you claiming 70% of the american population (statistically) _didn't_ believe Iraq had something to do with Sept 11?

    22. Re:The real story? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Why aren't you attacking the French for their rather nasty colonial past in Africa (or the Brits for that matter) or their more recent and still on-going profitable deals with various dictators and totalitarian governments?

      Attacking the past is next to useless because those countries/civilizations/etc don't exist anymore. Modern day Britain is not practicising colonialism anymore (for example). In contrast, USA is as imperialistic as ever. Therefore, we clearly can criticize the US. You asked when will we stop blaming you? Well the answer is simple: When you drop imperialism... When that happens, you can be sure that people will care as much about USA's misdeeds as they do of Spain right now.

      Note this important fact. USA is disliked/hated/avoided/etc by more people on earth than any colonial power ever was. Ever wonder why? The vast majority of hte people aren't being bombed by USA and they aren't bombing USA either. Yet many don't respect USA. Think about why.... Also, a 100 years ago very few people hated/disliked/criticized/etc USA. Hardly anyone blamed USA at the scale they do now. Ever wonder why?

      The answer that you seek lies in something called (modern day) imperialism... you might want to look that up...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    23. Re:The real story? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I'd rather ask you this: what should the Americans (the people, since you seem to be blatantly anti-American and not just anti-USA) do to get clean on your list?

      Drop your imperialistic (foreign) policies and the number of "anti-Americans" will drop exponentially...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  5. What business is it of theirs by Trigun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    U.S. government is busy trying to get Australia to change its laws to increase the profits of U.S. record companies.

    Let the record companies deal with it, not the government of another country.

    Yeah, globalization is a bitch. Deal.

    1. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Americans only like free markets and capitalism when it works in their favor. When it doesn't, they enjoy getting their government meddling with tolls and taxes and what not.

      They still have steel-tolls, right?

      They're not capitalist, they're as socialist as the rest of us (in Europe) -- it's just that they're either too stupid to see it, or in denial.

    2. Re:What business is it of theirs by qwertme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the US gov. is there to do anything possible to advantage the US citizens who vote for this gov...

      If there is more money for American companies then there is more wealth for the U.S.

      Since the U.S. makes their laws the laws of the whole world, the whole world should be allowed to vote in the U.S.

    3. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Ok, I RTFA, and I can't come to the same conclusion as our illustrious slashdot editor:

      the U.S. government is busy trying to get Australia to change its laws to increase the profits of U.S. record companies.

      The very first sentence in the linked article says:

      US TRADE officials have backed off from a tough line on music, movie and software piracy, admitting that shoehorning Australia into a copyright regime based on criminal law may be "a bridge too far".

      ...but this is /. and I guess it's easier to just take a comment from Michael for granted and just react to that, huh?

      Under heavy lobbying from the US entertainment and software industries, the Office of the US Trade Representative had listed the harmonisation of copyright legislation among issues to be raised with Australian negotiators for the Free Trade Agreement. But the head of the US Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration, Undersecretary Grant Aldonas, said America would not be pushing too hard on intellectual property during the current negotiations.

      Yeah, the *IAA pushed hard, the US govt doesn't seem to be doing too much though.

    4. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the steel tariffs were put in place because the rest of the world heavily subsidizes their steel industry . How can a steel company be expected to compete with the almost limitless resources of multiple governments? Everyone seems to act like the US is the only government that tries to protect its business interests, but all governments do. Most of them are just really really underhanded about it and keep it hush-hush. Look no further than France/Russia's real motives for supporting Iraq all these years (hint: it got them cheap oil and gave them a huge weapons market to sell to)

    5. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and the US doesn't subsidise any of it's export industries, does it?

      Oh whoops, yes they do. Fancy that!

    6. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both Russia and France are not exactly reference models of democracy, freedom and free market. USA, on the other hand, wants others to believe that they are.

      What do you think was the Iraq war for (hint: it is three letter word, starting with 'o' and ending with 'l').

    7. Re:What business is it of theirs by Xformer · · Score: 1

      Ah, but they are dealing with it, in the only way they know how to do anything. Buying legislation.

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    8. Re:What business is it of theirs by operagost · · Score: 1
      It's called diplomacy, fool. If you don't like it, your own government, whatever it is, can politely turn down their requests. If that doesn't work, well, there's always war! Good luck!

      Seriously, if you don't like how your particular country is kow-towing to American demands, then that's your problem and YOU need to fix it. You ARE in a democracy, aren't you?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it is three letter word, starting with 'o' and ending with 'l'

      Idiot. I'm a European and I've never bought that stupid argument. It's morons like you (on both sides of the Atlantic) who spout the government fed propaganda and thus perpetuate this silly but fundamentally very dangerous rift between the USA and Europe.

      First of all, USA burnt huge amounts of money and political capital in the war and even that huge sum is now being dwarfed by the costs of maintaining order and rebuilding the infrastructure. In order to recap the costs it would take approximately a decade from a fully operational Iraqi oil industry and assuming that every cent would go to the Americans - which is definitely not the case.

      Did the US administration have selfish interests here? Of course. So did the nationalist idiots in France and to a lesser extent in Germany and Russia. There are no selfless motives.

      So you should just shut up and stop your "no blood for oil" hysterics and do something constructive instead. If you live in France you might want to send a letter to your government and ask them politely to stop hindering the rebuilding effort in Iraq.

    10. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans only like free markets and capitalism when it works in their favor.

      And all Europeans are socialists or commie pinko bastards.

      Wait, you mean there is a broad spectrum of opinions on these subject matters, in both areas of the world?

    11. Re:What business is it of theirs by dnivie · · Score: 1

      America are socialists?!?
      I'll take that as an insult; it seems that you are confusing it with soviet communism. US is more of what i like to call a corporate democracy.

    12. Re:What business is it of theirs by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing is that the cheap CDs were imported from china most probably, which is certainly not capitalist.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    13. Re:What business is it of theirs by qwertme · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, you are right. And in a perfect world that would happen...

      But the world isent perfect and when the most powerful country puts pressure, you cant argue that you can politely say "No thank you" That is just silly

    14. Re:What business is it of theirs by PrImED73 · · Score: 0

      Let the record companies deal with it, not the government of another country.
      With the US governments track record, you'd have more chance finding a bacon sandwich at a jewish wedding.

      --
      --Mods giveth, Mods taketh away--
    15. Re:What business is it of theirs by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      The free market idea is working well I believe. Perhaps at the expense of the big record labels and ultimately the big movie labels of the US.

      The problem they have encountered is that their profit margin is high enough in the US that they believe that it should be that high elsewhere in the world. This is regardless of the fact that the artists they are promoting tend to suck these days.

      I honestly believe that if they spent less money on lawyers, and less money on promoting the artist of the month, and instead invested that money into getting more artists available for music and movies, that they would have a higher profit and be able to undercut sales of competetors. Granted there are some who would consider this dumping, but there is enough evidence posted to a wide variety of sources (usenet, various web pages, /., etc) that shows that the actual cost to produce and distribute the CD's that they are selling is significantly less than what the customer is being charged (as in an order of magnitude less.)

      If they are loosing court battles outside of the US because of their own narrow belief that the world owes them sales, I believe that they should loose. When enough of the world recognizes that the WIPO and varients of the DMCA are simply agents of US Mega-Corps that have only their own intersts at heart, and tells the US Mega-Corps to go xxxx themselves, perhaps the US Govornment will recognize that they are in a loosing position wrt laws and trade agreements and get their act together to be competitive again.

      Sadly being a citizen of the US, I don't expect that will happen within my expected life time.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    16. Re:What business is it of theirs by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      Really?

      I think the US nuclear subs/ships are still not allowed in New Zealand ports - in spite of significant pressure.

    17. Re:What business is it of theirs by vandan · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you don't like how your particular country is kow-towing to American demands, then that's your problem and YOU need to fix it. You ARE in a democracy, aren't you?

      I don't consider our current form of government to be particularly respresentative ( I'm in Australia ).

      Voting for one lying ( John Howard ), the thieving ( Pauling Hanson ) bastard ( Phillip Ruddock ) over another every 3 or 4 years isn't representative government. I'm sure the same is the case in the US and the UK. In the US, for example, I believe your past president was impeached on the grounds that he mislead the public ( about his sex life ) while Baby Bush paid his way in, and mislead the public over Iraq's 'massive' stocks of WOMD and somehow manages to dodge the impeachment problem Clinton had. Not that Clinton was a good president or anything ... just pointing out that your system stinks as much as ours. Maybe even more - because it's bigger.

      Please don't call what we have a democracy. Democracy sounds way too sophisticated. A democracy would have a referrendum before important events such as war. More than 50% of Australians were against invading Iraq without UN backing. I believe in Cuba, Turkey, and other places with 'democratic' governments, up to 98% of the people were against the war ... but their governments were in bed with the Pentagon. No wonder some Arabs blew the fuck out of it. Must have had enough of their shit. Same goes for the WTC. Did anyone stop and consider that they might have been asking for it, and that it wasn't a randomly chosen target? And don't give me that "they hate our success // they hate our freedom" bullshit. Every sane person wants freedom for all. The problem that is a couple of rich people are prepared to sacrifice almost everyone elses' freedom for their own enrichment. And they call their methods 'democracy'. Bullshit.

    18. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they aren't socialist because they don't care about the people. if the state gives money to the corporation, yes that defeats the free market and manipulates it but it doesn't make it socialist because the industry is still privatized.

    19. Re:What business is it of theirs by Zocalo · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Americans only like free markets and capitalism when it works in their favor. When it doesn't, they enjoy getting their government meddling with tolls and taxes and what not.

      And this is different from every other capitalist country how, exactly? OK, maybe the US does it more that others, but ultimately regardless of the financial/political/whatever system everyone is looking out for number one. The US just has the biggest stick at the moment and seems quite prepared to give it a swing, in a few hundred years it'll probably be the turn of some other nation(s).

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    20. Re:What business is it of theirs by ClubStew · · Score: 1

      It would be great if it worked that way. Unfortunately, the US government is too deep in bed with large companies that give them a lot of money (and yet taxes keep going up!) to "sway" their campaigns. Unfortunately, the gov't is far too corrupt: greedy and power-hungry.

      How does it change? By voting incumbants out of office. Hopefully a few fresh changes of the various branches will help things.

    21. Re:What business is it of theirs by gidds · · Score: 4, Insightful
      they're as socialist as the rest of us

      [fx: reads downthread] Oh dear... The problem here is that different people see different things when they read. When you or I read 'socialist', we see someone who wants the community as a whole owning and controlling industry, and the social and political organisation that goes along with it. Or something along those lines.

      But when many Yanks read 'socialist', they seem to see "Filthy! Subversive! Pinko! Dirty! Commie! Bastard! Atheist! Traitor! Die! Die! Die!" instead. Which kind of makes informed political debate rather difficult.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    22. Re:What business is it of theirs by Shimbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone seems to act like the US is the only government that tries to protect its business interests, but all governments do...Look no further than France/Russia's real motives for supporting Iraq all these years

      Of course, governments pursue thir own interests, and those of their citizens. Most of the time, that's a reasonable way to act. The annoying thing about the US government, is that it expects everyone else to act to further US interests, and seems surprised and offended when they don't.

    23. Re:What business is it of theirs by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      As has been said here many times, a true democracy would mean a referendum on every issue. We would not vote for people. We would vote for laws, just as our "congress" does now.

      To me, democracy misses the point. The point is that no law should be enacted that takes away from an individuals rights ("rights" not entitlements). Anything else that the majority might want is fine, but it's not much better in my view than a simple monarchy with an intelligent king. And any "constitution" should not be changeable, regardless of the vote.

      Where did you get the idea that Cuba is a democracy of any kind? Nobody ever votes there. Everyone who has a (legal) job works for the government and they are paid mainly with food ration coupons.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    24. Re:What business is it of theirs by forinti · · Score: 0

      Is it not? There are a lot of private enterprises there. They're not democratic, but that's something else.

    25. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the steel tariffs were put in place because the rest of the world heavily subsidizes their steel industry

      Yeah, just like the tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber, right?

      You know, the ones that are illegal under NAFTA.

      The softwood lumber that the WTO said was NOT being subsidized..

    26. Re:What business is it of theirs by rognvaldr · · Score: 1

      > it's just that they're either too stupid to see it, or in denial. no I'm not. --Lost my sig

    27. Re:What business is it of theirs by mark2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      the steel tariffs were put in place because the rest of the world heavily subsidizes their steel industry . How can a steel company be expected to compete with the almost limitless resources of multiple governments?

      I would believe that if the tariffs were targetted at just those countries that did subsidise their steel production. However, none of the European countries affected by this tariff do subsidise steel production - they simply have a lower cost base due to much more modern production facilities. The British steel industry had to slash costs in the 80s to meet foreign competition and so has a much more modern industry than the good old US of A. This is called competition and competitive advantage - it is nothing to do with subsidy...

    28. Re:What business is it of theirs by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      And this is different from every other capitalist country how, exactly?...The US just has the biggest stick at the moment

      Exactally. They have the biggest stick, and are prepared to use it. They'll put import tarrifs on anything they see as a threat to domestic products, but don't you dare put tariffs on our stuff...even to countries with which they have a free trade agreement. Countires with whom the US is the largest trading partner and have no other cheap market for goods.

      A few hundred years? I don't think it'll take longer than a decade for people to realize the US doesn't play nice with other.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    29. Re:What business is it of theirs by rognvaldr · · Score: 1

      > it's just that they're either too stupid to see it, or in denial.

      no I'm not.

      --Lost my sig

    30. Re:What business is it of theirs by Herkules · · Score: 0

      I think you got socialism a bit wrong. Its about no one profeting of your work!

      Comunisum: Work after ability get payed after your needs.
      Socialsim: Work after ability get payed after your deeds.
      Capitalism; Work after ability get payed after boss takes his share.

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    31. Re:What business is it of theirs by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Right.

      However, not all of us Kiwis agree with that decision. Not only that it hurts our economy, perhaps worse is the bitter taste it leaves when you think about who are we gonna turn to for help if shit hits the fan.

    32. Re:What business is it of theirs by Troed · · Score: 1

      I'm also European, and while oil was only one of the reasons for that war, it's still one of them. The other were to remove an unstable regime that would've been taken over by Iran sooner than later, please Israel and be able to move the troups from the REAL Sept 11 culprit - Saudi Arabia - to somewhere else in the region.

      The embarrassing part is all the lies the US felt they had to feed their own population and the rest of the world with. I applaud the stance France took.

    33. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to music, China has a lot free market than the United States.

    34. Re:What business is it of theirs by Requiem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's not forget softwood lumber tariffs, which have cost the Canadian lumber industry thousands of jobs.

    35. Re:What business is it of theirs by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I would have thought "corporate democracy" would self-evidently have to be a contradiction in terms. I'll give you the "corporate"; that much is manifestly true, but don't confuse that with democracy. That's just woolly thinking.

    36. Re:What business is it of theirs by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      the REAL Sept 11 culprit - Saudi Arabia

      That has to be one of the most ridiculously inflammatory and ill-informed statements I have read on Slashdot in recent months. It's not that long ago since certain hawks were trying to convince us that Saddam Hussein was personally responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

      Try thinking for yourself. I'm quite sure that not every American can be as cretinous as George W. Bush.

    37. Re:What business is it of theirs by elefantstn · · Score: 1
      Of course, governments pursue thir own interests, and those of their citizens. Most of the time, that's a reasonable way to act. The annoying thing about the US government, is that it expects everyone else to act to further US interests, and seems surprised and offended when they don't.


      The annoying thing about the rest of the world is that it seems to regard this as a uniquely American phenomenon.
      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    38. Re:What business is it of theirs by twinpot · · Score: 1

      No, not all agree, but a significant majority do support the continuing ban on nuclear armed or powered vessels. It is not a ban on conventional vessels, or anything else. We still send peace-keepers, the SAS are/were involved in Afghanistan, so it's not as if we shirk our responsibilities.

      The US is still putting pressure on NZ about this, and about parallel imports, etc. etc, plus using tarrifs to block or inhibit a lot of goods which we can produce far more efficiently.

    39. Re:What business is it of theirs by Troed · · Score: 1

      ill-informed? Maybe you need to read up on _why_ I wrote that.

      one of many links Google can help you find

    40. Re:What business is it of theirs by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      aahhh... Iraq again! Well this is completely off-topic but since I don't really care about my Karma, here we go again!

      Idiot... It's morons like you...

      You know what? I sincerely believe YOU are the moron... but since I don't want to look like a fool I won't say it. ;-)

      [...] very dangerous rift between the USA and Europe.

      Oh yes, it's a dangerous rift. So now the choice is do we bend over or do we defend our interests at the risk of being beaten up. It's the age old question : safety or freedom?

      First of all, USA burnt huge amounts of money

      Who will pay for this? The american population. Who will profit from this? The american corporations. Also the money spent was not given to Iraq but to american corporations. It's just a form of subsidies to help the american economy.

      it would take approximately a decade from a fully operational Iraqi oil industry and assuming that every cent would go to the Americans - which is definitely not the case.

      Are you an accountant or something? War is about control and power, not money. Oil is a way to gain control and hence, power.

      If you live in France you might want to send a letter to your government and ask them politely to stop hindering the rebuilding effort in Iraq.

      You mean to give money to the US government so they can give it to US corporations to help the US economy? Now that would be pretty stupid, don't you think?

      BTW, Wolfowitz said the reason for war in Iraq was oil and WMD were just an excuse everyone could agree on. And I'm pretty sure he knows more on the subject then you do...

    41. Re:What business is it of theirs by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Close, its more like coporate feudalism. The congress critters are the local lords, the heads of the coporations are the dukes etc. And the president is the king, it just so happenes that, like often did in feudalistic society, that the aristocricy wields much of the power, but the king is a nice figurehead for people to rally around, and for all of the blame to fall on.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    42. Re:What business is it of theirs by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Errr... I'm not sure that I would rate the Detroit Free Press (whoever they might be) as a reliable or authoritative source of information.

      Google is useful, but only if used intelligently.

    43. Re:What business is it of theirs by Troed · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      Then use Google and be amazed at the number of links you'll get to OTHER places containing the same information, with the same very credible sources. Did you even bother to check that before you attacked the one example I posted?

    44. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is Americans hear "socialist" and think 75% taxes and 25% unemployment ... i.e. EUROPE .. .which we don't want, thank you!

      What bothers me is that Eurpoeans think everything anyone in America is evil, no matter what, since they are now insignificant in global matters since about the 1800's.

    45. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, Russia sold Iraq 57% of it's weapons. France sold them 14%. USA sold them 1%. Imagine France and Russia were against the war ? France is such a non-factor don't even bother listening to them... FRANCE = NON FACTOR ...desperate to get in the world stage, anyway they can. BTW these stats come from SWEDEN.

    46. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another mis-informed Eurpoean. American's hear "socialist" and think 75% taxes and 25% unemployment...i.e. EUROPE....we don't want that, thank you. Now, go deal with your massive inferiority complex, Sigmund.

    47. Re: What business is it of theirs by gidds · · Score: 1
      American's hear "socialist" and think 75% taxes and 25% unemployment

      ...which is even less accurate than my post was...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    48. Re:What business is it of theirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >[fx: reads downthread] Oh dear... The problem
      >here is that different people see different
      >things when they read. When you or I read
      >'socialist', we see someone who wants the
      >community as a whole owning and controlling
      >industry, and the social and political
      >organisation that goes along with it. Or
      >something along those lines.

      >But when many Yanks read 'socialist', they seem
      >to see "Filthy! Subversive! Pinko! Dirty! Commie!
      >Bastard! Atheist! Traitor! Die! Die! Die!"
      >instead. Which kind of makes informed political
      >debate rather difficult.

      Considering the first definition wants to hand everything over to the government, I fail to see how it's much different than the second definition.

      Waitin' for that -1 Troll from some European...

  6. Being depressing by PurpleWizard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    but not defeatist.

    This is just a battle slowing the seemingly inevitable unless changes that are more fundamental are made. It is just part of the trend like DRM, software patents making it into Europe and the like...

    What's the real solution to the continual move of power to corporations? Or is it best we all just roll over and take it like good domestic livestock?

    1. Re:Being depressing by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 4, Informative

      Software patents have not yet made it in to Europe for fear of it being like the US, in fact all over europe at the moment there are protests to software copyright and patents.

      In fact the majority of the EU doesn't actually want it and a lot of the EMP's are fighting to have it chucked out.

      S

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    2. Re:Being depressing by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      Uhhuh?

      And you've got any evidence of this resistance, because I've seen absolutely nothing. Zero. Nada. Zilch.

    3. Re:Being depressing by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      There's a protest and lobbying meeting being organised at the European Parliament next Wednesday in order to get an anti software patents message across in advance of the vote scheduled for Monday week.

      The antis have been slow getting themsleves organised and sending a message more sophisticated than "Stop being a tool of capitalist imperialist pigs!" - but something is happening.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    4. Re:Being depressing by rthille · · Score: 1

      Buy guns. No, I'm really serious. You should own at least a pistol and rifle per person in your family. And a fair bit of ammo.
      I certainly don't recommend an armed insurrection yet, but one day it may come, and an armed population ready to rise up and defend their rights against an oppressive group in control, be it the govt. or corporations.
      And while you wait for the revolution to start, try to stave it off by writing letters/email/fax to govt. officials, friends and the corporations you believe are acting inappropriately. Try to avoid products produced by such corps. and encourage others to do the same. (carping about the MPAA while waiting for the latest Matrix to start is counter productive :-)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  7. Bleeeech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh.. "Penalties More Than Doubled to Over $2 Million as Full Court Upholds Part of CDs Decision". Don't I feel like an idiot?

    No wait, I don't. This is news for nerds, I fully expected a hexa number to actually be hexa and not a mistyped dollar amount.

    1. Re:Bleeeech. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not mistyped. It's 2 Million AUD, austrialian dollars.

  8. now all we need to do.. by Epistax · · Score: 0, Funny

    is run across the border like with Canada for drugs for the lower prices! I'll start the bus service!

    no wait...

    1. Re:now all we need to do.. by Epistax · · Score: 1

      sigh.. someone didn't get it and trolled me. In case this person decides to do a double take, I was referring to the bus services between many nothern states and Canada which run US'ers to Canada for cheaper drugs. I was suggesting I start a similiar bus service to Australia for people to buy cheaper CD's. The joke is (obviously) that you can't have a bus service across the Pacific Ocean, and this kind of re-importation would be much more difficult.

      bah

    2. Re:now all we need to do.. by RCO · · Score: 1

      Hey, not so, pontoons on the Greyhound (sorry, I just pictured a dog w/ water wings) and we're there...

      --
      'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
  9. Why should US companies complain? by djeaux · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First, a $2 million fine is chump change for Warner and Universal.

    Second, although the Australian court decision is couched in the guise of "copyright law," it's no different in effect from protective tariffs or import taxes.

    This raises the question why Australia didn't just enact an import tariff on compact discs equivalent to 100% of the price of an Australian-made CD.

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    1. Re:Why should US companies complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is the complete opposite. They want to make CDs cheaper for people by encouraging parralel imports. Import duties would be counterproductive to that aim.

    2. Re:Why should US companies complain? by Trigun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because the WTO would be all over their ass. The WTO is the governing body for international trade. Few have stood up to it and won.
      Kind of like a global mob.

    3. Re:Why should US companies complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How the fuck is fining a company for bringing in cheap parallel imports going to make CDs cheaper for people?

      Or does Australian logic spin in the reverse direction from the northern hemisphere?

    4. Re:Why should US companies complain? by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      The Australian courts have done something good. Let's not look a gift horse in the mouth. Australian consumers can really punish Warner and Universal by not buying their CDs. That could amount to a great deal more than chump change in lost sales.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    5. Re:Why should US companies complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha! Mod parent up +1 Funny, the login spin hemisphere thing was a good one!

    6. Re:Why should US companies complain? by Random832 · · Score: 1

      the title on the post is wrong - the fines aren't for the importers (according to the text of the summary) they're for the [local, though branches of multinational coroprations] record labels that are trying to stop imports using anticompetitive leverage.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    7. Re:Why should US companies complain? by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Kind of like a global mob.

      Not very global; it's basically a wing of the US Trade Department. It is very like the mob, though, I agree with that.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    8. Re:Why should US companies complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, he law prosecutes illegal importers, which means anyone without appropriate distribution agreements bringing copyright material into the country (be warned, this could probably affect P2P users at both ends). Warner & Universal usually have distribution agreements, so aren't likely to face fines.

      Second, The law is about where the CDs themselves are made: it allows the distributor to manufacture the CDs in any county, so it is actually the complete opposite of what you describe.

    9. Re:Why should US companies complain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are fining people for **PREVENTING** cheap parallel imports. RTFA!!!

  10. cd's are bad by Flingles · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the words of taco-man

    "I haven't bought a cd since 1999. Not because I download songs, but quite frankly RIAA, your music sucks donkey balls.

    --
    Karma: -2^0.5 . Mainly due to the imbibing of dihydrogen monoxide
    1. Re:cd's are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, you might get +5, Funny if you can finish the quote.

    2. Re:cd's are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....

      Salty donkey balls in cmdrtaco's mouth,
      he likes the taste.

    3. Re:cd's are bad by 77Punker · · Score: 0

      On a similar note, I haven't bought any music for myself recorded after 1987 or so (not counting remastered recordings), for the same reasons.

  11. You cant sign off on illegal behaviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are not responsible for poor management, as long as it isnt criminally negligent, but that is about it.

  12. US-encoded DVDs? by LehiNephi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get US-encoded DVD's? Does the submitter mean getting those DVD's in Australia, or does he mean getting them to legally play in Australia.

    If the first, well....fat chance. The guys running those publishing companies have their heads in a tight, dark place.

    If the second, just ax the region encoding on your DVD player.

    --
    Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    1. Re:US-encoded DVDs? by muffen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Get US-encoded DVD's? Does the submitter mean getting those DVD's in Australia ... well....fat chance.

      Is there a law in place in Australia against importing Region 1 DVDs???

      I understand that there are trade-barriers in place, so that you have to pay VAT on the DVD's. But is there a law that actually states that you cannot import region 1 DVDs?

      Last I checked, several online retailers in the US and Canada are willing to ship their DVD's worldwide. DVDBoxOffice will even package them one by one so you don't have to pay VAT (when shipping to Europe atleast). Play is based in the UK, and they sell region 1 DVDs and ship worldwide.

      In regards to the region protection in DVDplayers.. well.. it's a joke. I think I could solder a chip into one of those players in my sleep (I know some are harder etc). On top of that, some cheap players I've come across had a hidden menu where you could simply change the region. So, I don't see how it would be difficult to get Region 1 DVD's in Australia, or any other western country for that matter.

    2. Re:US-encoded DVDs? by Gantoris · · Score: 1
      It is fully legal to buy non-regioned DVD players in Australia.

      Thanks to the efforts of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Who are also responsible for this court case.

    3. Re:US-encoded DVDs? by lpontiac · · Score: 1
      Get US-encoded DVD's? Does the submitter mean getting those DVD's in Australia [...] fat chance.

      There's no law against selling them here, and many niche stores (the same sort of places that sell roleplaying games and comic books) sell them openly - as in big friggin' signs saying "Region 1, NTSC."

      The mainstream stores don't sell them, because (a) the 'mainstream' titles are all available as Region 4 (b) it's too much trouble dealing with all the people who'd return titles complaining "it doesn't work?" "You were told you needed a region free player, right?" "Yes, but I don't care about any of that techno babble..." (c) it's expensive for stores to import them

      Mainstream department stores do, however, happily sell region free/select players.

    4. Re:US-encoded DVDs? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      In regards to the region protection in DVDplayers.. well.. it's a joke. I think I could solder a chip into one of those players in my sleep

      Well, here in the US, I was able to buy a DVD player that has a hidden menu option to change the region code. And before anyone complains that the manufacturers don't care about changes from region 1, it also supports PAL and has a SCART connector on the back, so it was clearly designed with european markets in mind.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  13. court number by IFF123 · · Score: 4, Funny

    $A2 million fine?
    -- must be some computer friendly judge to pass the fine in hex notation.

    --
    Who took my tinfoil hat?
    1. Re:court number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ill say, 162 million dollars is a lot of money, though!

    2. Re:court number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, yeah, that's Informative ;-) ... if it was actually using hex notation and not a joke because of a typo.

    3. Re:court number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't a typo. Two million dollars Australian. I assume. And everyone knows the Aussies use octal. Which doesn't really change anything here, but still.

    4. Re:court number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is obvious, but I'll mention it anyway... $A2million refers to "2 million Australian Dollars", i.e. about 1.2 million USD.

      It's ususally written as A$2 million, though.

  14. U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by gabrieltss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it me or is the U.S. the ONLY country not "Beating Back" the abusiveness of it's own corporations and government. (This should get me tag as a terrorist by saying this, in a country were supposedly we have a 1st amendment right to freedom of speech!).

    Yes I do live in the U.S., yes I do think it is corrupt from the top levels of our goverment down to the corporations.

    It seems just about every other country in the world is smacking the U.S. corporations that are trying to screw everyone, but for some strange reason WE CAN'T!

    Look what kind of crap we are having to fight:

    1) SCO - 'nuff said!
    2) MPAA/RIAA - take away our rights to fair use, and to mayn other things to list.
    3) Our Goverment - Took away our 4th amendment with the Patiriot act and allow law enforcement agencies free reign in what they do. All in the name of "terrorism".

    What they don't want you to know is that our damn goverment KNEW about 911 on August 20th. THe Israil (sp?) Massad warned our governemt about a terrorist threat and of massive amounts of terrorists (about 200 I belive) comming into this country. There was even an article about it in the Jeruselum Post's website not long after 911. (Any of our Israli brothers want to confirm this?)
    That's right your own government let it happen, why you say??? Think about what they have been able to do with that "terrorist threat" that they are using to try and scare us with. The patriot act, now talk of the patriot act II. Patriot Act - that is a damn slap in the face to the TRUE patriots that gave their lives for this country to be what it is today! I being former military am ASHAMED of our government right now!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      How is the parent insightful? He starts to talk about the topic and then degrades into a "we knew about the 9/11 attacks before they happened" conspiracy theory. No your not a terrorist but you should keep it on-topic.

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    2. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by fuckfuck101 · · Score: 0

      it isn't just about the security agencies failure to pick it out of what i`m sure is a big list of stuff to filter, but in the whole of north america on september there was only TWO fighter jets available, for a great military power (well any nation actually) thats pretty damn pathetic. and no this is not off-topic as i`m replying to a post about this topic :)

      --
      Comment: Yes I realise the username 'fuckfuck101' makes me sound intelligent, no you cannot buy it from me.
    3. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I being former military am ASHAMED of our government right now!

      The spelling and grammattical errors in your post certainly indicate you have a military background ;-)

      I have to say I agree with you, though.

    4. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1
      I being former military am ASHAMED of our government right now!

      Well, you're not the only american who's ashamed of his goverment. I hear it plenty of times. But sadly, there ARE goverments that bend over massively to US goverment demands. Back here in the NL, our prime minister is a prime example of being a bit too much pro-US, usually agreeing on matters before they are even officially proposed to our goverment by the US goverment. There are officials that are even worse, who I suspect of being nothing more then a meaty puppet for Bush.

      And well, let's see... We don't have an overly active SCO-esque thingy going on over here, our stock market scandals are far less far reaching because our legal system doesn't allow for anything spectacular. I could pretty much nuke a small town and get away with an apology, so imagine how strick they are on stock fraud. We DO have our equivalent of the RIAA/MPAA, called "stichting BREIN" (click the pretty little Union Jack (Yes, the english flag.) for an english translation.) which already threatened "major" P2P users. Take a good look at the supporters of the whole organization. Yes, that reads MPAA, Motion Picture Association of America. Supporting anti-piracy here in The Netherlands. Wee. When do we become the nth state of the USA and will I get US citizenship?

      Bastards. Both of our goverments. Christian fundamentalist capalists rule the world. Oh rapture!

    5. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i almost agree, but you put:

      "...corrupt from the top levels of our goverment down to the corporations"

      it's the other way around, i'm afraid the corporations are wearing the pants.

    6. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would only be a conspiracy theory if it wasn't true.

    7. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      most people's first instinct is to call you a conspiracy nut, but i'd say you're mostly right. Here's one for you ontop of what you've already said. After the blackout of NY/Canada/Ohio/etc there was talk of investigations, probes, inquirys and so on, but if you're paying attention you'll see that the Guberment is doing it's damndest to fold them all into the US/Canada inquiry.. even baldly stating that there's no need for independant reviews of the blackout. my first thought was "this is one way for them to control the flow of information about this debacle"

      The U.S. has a long history of obscuring the facts, but if you want people to believe you, wild sensationalism is only going to come off as supermarket tabloid trash. This is the /. crowd, give nuggets of information and independant proof to back up your statements :COUGH like a real link to the article in your JPost COUGH: and let people make up their own minds

    8. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Naw, the US will just keep you guys as a colony for its corporations to milk money out of like England did to it's colonies back in the day.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    9. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "grammattical"?

    10. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.standdown.net, this is a really scarey conspiracy theory that has a ton of fact behind it.

    11. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by axxackall · · Score: 1
      What they don't want you to know is that our damn goverment KNEW about 911 on August 20th. THe Israil (sp?) Massad warned our governemt about a terrorist threat and of massive amounts of terrorists (about 200 I belive) comming into this country. There was even an article about it in the Jeruselum Post's website not long after 911. (Any of our Israli brothers want to confirm this?)

      I remember several Rusian articale THAT August (2001) saying that Russian special intelligence forces sent to FBI a report about upcoming threat of a major torrorist attack on the territory of US> The report was based information they have got in Chechnya from arabic rebels (vakhabits) cought in the battle. Right after 9/11 Russian intelligence experts said in the interview "why has our report been ignored? It's not Cold War anymore. We should work together. Instead ALL our reports we send to FBI are ignored." I remember those interviews, but in many archives those articles are already cleaned up: Mr Putin is a very good organizator.

      The trueth is that many people in US govt as well some US corporations had made already big political and financial benefits on things that wouldn't ahppaned if not 9/11. High oil prices? Texas oil companies appreciate it. Al Quaeda in Afganistan? It's perfect time to make money by weapon and war suppliment corps. Hi-tech stocks hit the bottom? Perfect time to buy them all, we'll sell them later. Not enough money made on Afganistan? Let's go to Iraq as Dick Cheney's companies need more contracts.

      --

      Less is more !
    12. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by misterpies · · Score: 1

      > > I being former military am ASHAMED of our government right now!

      >The spelling and grammattical errors in your post certainly indicate you have a military background

      you mean because there aren't any (at least in the part you quote?

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    13. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      I have to admit that site is pretty interesting. Thanks for the link.

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    14. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      This has precisely shit to do with the MPAA/RIAA and Australian imports. Mods, the "offtopic" selection isn't always a bad thing.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    15. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Where does your information come from on only two fighter jets being available?

      My brother-in-law is a fighter pilot in the Navy, based in Norfolk, and he says that this is BS. On his carrier alone, he can account for seven (fighter jets, F-18's I think) planes being available (meaning ready to take-off at a moment's notice.) And that's just counting planes that would be available for HIM to fly...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    16. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by fuckfuck101 · · Score: 0

      Uhm, this was from an official US Gov press release about 2 weeks after september 11th. There was alot more jets actually available but weren't 'fly-right', i.e they were either unfueled, weapons wasn't all set up, or regular safety checks hadn't been carried out, and on the september 11th a jet was needed INSTANTLY and none of these things could be done in time. Also these two jets actually lost the boeing (it stopped reponding, went down some 29,000 ft and then headed towards Washington) that landed on the pentagon, after taking off and heading towards it, it went off radar (i'm not sure why, I'd guess that it was because it went down so low, or something) and no one knew where it was until it was too late. By pure coincidence i actually re-read that speech (well about 2/3 of it) yesterday while reading a conspiracy book on 9/11 in WaterStones. I also find it unbelievable, so do we think that the goverment is lying, mistaken, or accept some of these conspiracies?

      --
      Comment: Yes I realise the username 'fuckfuck101' makes me sound intelligent, no you cannot buy it from me.
    17. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I said "in your post", not "in the tiny quote I extracted from your post".

    18. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it should have been "grammatical". That was just a typo, though.

    19. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I really don't know the answer. Perhaps the military was essentially caught with it's proverbial pants down, and it's a cover-up. Maybe they are techincally correct, using some obscure logic like "pilots were not actually IN the planes at the time, and so they were unavailable" or something like that.

      Either way, kinda stinks.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    20. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      Some (though not nearly enough) U.S. Patriots ARE fighting back against our government's behavior. If we can bring awareness and concern to enough of our Citizens we can turn this ship around and put her on the right course again. Our leaders must be held accountable to the U.S. Constitution. It up to US to see that it's done.

    21. Re:U.S. only Country Not beating back the U.S. by Giggles+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

      I find it rather irritating that many people use broad generalizations to classify evil. From your post, I gather that you feel all corperations are bad, currupt, and of a single mind when it comes to being hell bent on killing the little guy and making money for their CEOs. While it is true that this is the case for many (Enron is a good example), it hardly warrents classifying all corps as evil. What's evil about Red Hat, for example, or AMD, or Blockbuster, or Subway?

      Also, not all aspects of the government is bad either. While I am pissed at Bush's "war on terror" being used as an excuse to invade every small country that annoys him, I do find many things that I am thankful the government did. The National Park system would not exist without it, nor would the Interstate Highway system, careful regularion of perscription drugs (raises cost, yes, but keeps your asprin from making your hair fall out), and many others.

      So please, PLEASE, target your wrath where it needs to go. Pick the specific thing/idea/policy/problem you want to fight and put your energies there. Push for a more watchful eye on corperation accounting, and better communication within the intelligence community. Simply yelling that all corperations are evil and the entire government is currupt is, in my opinion, a poor way to get things improved. Looking at the problems one by one and coming up with reasonable solutions to them marches us towards progress with a steady beat.

      --
      "A coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave but one."
  15. Another knockback for the MPAA- record UK CD sales by tagishsimon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who'd have thought? CDs honor the traditional price elacticity of demand for commodity goods: don't rip off your punters and they'll buy your product.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/315 8767.stm

  16. Screw the record companies by motorsabbath · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Definately - screw them for everything they're worth - they've been doing it to the rest of the planet (esp. the US) for years. All the real music is on independent label anyway....

    --
    The heat from below can burn your eyes out
    1. Re:Screw the record companies by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

      All the real music is on independent label anyway....

      If that's the case, why don't people buy more of the independent labels? Oh, obviously you can differentiate between "real" music while the masses can't. I hate this elitest crap.

      The RIAA is digging their own graves around the world. If they don't change, people will get tired of them. Black market is already bigger in most countries. But don't think the masses don't like their music. Sure, there are many people that don't like it and many of the masses could appreciate more music. But most of the "pirates" aren't downloading independent labels, even given the opportunities.

      This ruling won't affect the RIAA much. But if other places do the same thing, cumulatively, there can be a big effect. RIAA is already betting the farm by going against users in court.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
  17. Business as usual... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Insightful
    1 import CDs
    2 gouge consumers
    3 coerce competitors
    4 ???
    5 coerce governments
    6 PROFIT!!!!

    Subverting governments is a typically anglo-saxon way of doing "business". In the late 1700's, a britshit brewer named Molson moved into newly-conquered France, and upon seeing that the cider-drinking french natives were eschewing his beet, simply had the governor outlaw cider-making.
    Being too stupid to adapt to the market by making cider, he had the market adapt to him.
    200 years later, his beer still tastes like horse-piss.

    1. Re:Business as usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Molson moved into newly-conquered France

      Um... I assume you mean newly-conquered Quebec...

    2. Re:Business as usual... by Talthane · · Score: 5, Informative

      So you would be referring to the man who in 1786 founded Molson's beer in Canada, having emigrated from Britain where cider is so common that the West Country (south-west) in particular is known as one of the great cider-making places in the world, and is only peripherally - not to mention frequently reluctantly - close to France, a country that is known mainly for its wines and champagne?

      I think your geography's a bit off, as is your history of liquor (hmm...perhaps the two are related)...

      Oh, and we didn't conquer France in 1786 - they were busy winding up to chop a lot of people's heads off. A suitable fate for SCO executives, perhaps.

      --
      "This is why men never share their feelings; because women always remember." -Just Shoot Me.
    3. Re:Business as usual... by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      Funny, I could have sworn that the hangovers I had in Normandy were caused by the local cider :-)

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    4. Re:Business as usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Brittany, in fact, hard cider -- called Calvados -- is a favorite beverage.

  18. Myth of the Free Market by vergil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've always found it intriguing how actions on behalf of the US Trade Representative against parallel importation (a.k.a. "the gray market") flies in the face of the current U.S. administration's professed loyalty to the merits of a global "free market."

    In my opinion, a thriving gray market -- where consumers seek out cheaper products/services in other districts/countries -- is evidence of a healthy, competitive global economy.



    Sincerely,

    Vergil

    1. Re:Myth of the Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, a thriving gray market -- where consumers seek out cheaper products/services in other districts/countries -- is evidence of a healthy, competitive global economy.

      That's the point. Why would the US (and US companies) want healthy, competitive global economy, when they can lobby monopolized, US-led global economy?

    2. Re:Myth of the Free Market by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

      I agree Vergil. Oh, and by the way, you're sacked, we're outsourcing your job to India.

      I do happen to actually agree with you, but let's not pretend that globalisation is as simple as dropping trade barriers and allowing people to buy and sell where they choose. Globalisation changes peoples lives and many people don't want their lives changed. Long term, it's for the better (or that's the theory), but there is, for some, a pretty painful short term we have to try hard to minimise.

    3. Re:Myth of the Free Market by sirbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What the current administration is seeking is not free markets. A free trade agreement is about 1 sentence long. Here's a sample:

      "Your country's people may freely take goods and services not subsidized trough taxes and bring them into our nation to sell to anyone at any price they are willing to pay, and our people may do the same in your nation."

      Anything with tens of thousands of pages of regulations and restrictions, like the WTO/GATT, is not free trade. It's managed trade. Basically the current (and previous since Clinton made GATT) administration's idea of "free trade" is moving managed control from the federal level to some global pseudo-government entity, like the WTO. Either way it is restricted, controlled trade. This is not only anti-socialism (the socialists being the primary WTO protesters) but it is also anti-capitalism, since capitalism is about trade of labour amung willing individuals (with property being the end-product of labour) without outside forces controlling their labour transaction. And when trade is controlled by government entities it is pretty much a given that it will be used to the advantage of those in power rather than to promote actual free trade.

      So you have a good point in seeing policies that fly in the face of "loyalty to global 'free markets'". Even the WTO flies in the face of such, being an organization that *controls* trade. The bigger picture truly is that the administration has no loyalty to global free markets. It has loyalty to market systems that it can weasle the most power from, like any other administration unfortunately would, including Clinton's from which the WTO was born.

      --
      "The State is that great fiction by which everyone lives at the expense of everyone else." -Frederic Bastiat.
    4. Re:Myth of the Free Market by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong (not being a capitalist) but I believe capitalism does not consider gray markets to be free market. Similarly, I think capitalism does not consider black market to be a part of the free market either.

      This is highly ironic and shows the stupidity of capitalists since black markets are the closest thing to a free market. Not having any regulations and not paying any taxes is very close to the ideal free market.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  19. Now that's a fine!! by lobsterGun · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...to more than $A2 million


    You know they're serious when they have to make up new numbers to describe the amount of the fine!

    Either that or they fined them in hex dollars (works out to $162 million).
    1. Re:Now that's a fine!! by El+Neepo · · Score: 1

      wouldn't that be 102 million?

    2. Re:Now that's a fine!! by El+Neepo · · Score: 0

      nevermind, I'm stupid

    3. Re:Now that's a fine!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $A2 million refers to the spreadsheet in Excel that the journalist used to work out how much the total figure was. Unfortunately, the cell A2 only contained 0.0001.

    4. Re:Now that's a fine!! by Mop · · Score: 1

      A2 000 000 hex == 2 717 908 992 dec

      2.7 billions. Nice number for a fine, indeed.

    5. Re:Now that's a fine!! by MindsEye · · Score: 1

      No, they mean 2 million Australian Dollars.

    6. Re:Now that's a fine!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that last comment was very on-topic. :)

  20. The last comment in the post is telling. by Hoplite3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The WTO is supposed to support free trade and globalization. All sorts of countries are behind it, yet it hasn't bestirred itself to do anything about the most blantant anti-world market move ever made: region encoding on DVDs and videogames. Why can studios divide market? Why can't I buy Japanese games and play them in the US?

    Well, I guess the answer is obvious. But it irks me that everyone bought into international trade organizations that are so clearly biased.

    By the way, does this price-fixing crap remind anyone else of a similar US case? Did members of the industry get personally fined, or were they protected behind the corporate veil? Good thing Australia's got its act together. At least someone does.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
    1. Re:The last comment in the post is telling. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they've got their act together. A 2 million Aussie buck fine against the RIAA is like giving a guy that explodes a car bomb a parking ticket and a stern warning.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  21. Free Trade by muzzmac · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the Big Deals in Australian politics is what is called "Free Trade". John Howard (Our Prime Minister) seems prepared to sell his soul to get "free trade" with the US.

    What does free trade mean?

    Basically having the US not protect its own farmers and let Aussie produce compete on an even footing with US produce.

    Problem is. The US government will never play in the important markets. Beef. No chance. Wheat, yeah right.

    Lamb. (The US has no real lamb market or demand) OK Free trade on Lamb. Oh and by the way. To get that you need to strengthen your Intellectual Property laws.

    Well Mr Howard being Bush fanboy #2 thinks that's a great idea.

    Aussie farmers are pretty ambivalent to the whole deal. No free trade basically means we now have one of the best performing farm systems there is.

    Oh check this out:

    http://www.austa.net/pdf/chapter4.pdf

    From within:

    US Interest in Australias position:

    - Restrict parallel importing of recorded music and branded goods
    - Concern about laws concerning decompilation of software
    - Concern about the adequacy of test data for pharamcueticals.
    - Concern that civil rather than criminal remedies are favoured for abuse of copyright or music.

    And we are going to sell that to sell a few friggin' sheep that Americans don't eat anyway.

    Idiots.

    1. Re:Free Trade by SolubleFrank · · Score: 1

      Little Johnny took to the streets of America recently in order to strengthen his name.


      (right hand side, apologies for realplayer video)

      --
      Feed me a stray cat.
    2. Re:Free Trade by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      - Concern about laws concerning decompilation of software

      It's always nice with Australia/US FTA's mention me personally.

      We fought so damn hard for those decompilation laws. Now they're going to take em away for the god damn lamb market?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Free Trade by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      There's only one major flaw in your argument: John Howard has no soul to sell.

  22. Conversion Rate by loserbert · · Score: 4, Informative

    2000000 Australian Dollars = 1300300 United States Dollars 1 AUD = 0.65015 USD 1 USD = 1.53811 AUD Taken from ozforex

  23. I'm sure the RIAA is thinking.. by xThinkx · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Damn, now we have to buy off ANOTHER government, time to sue more file sharers and blame it on them"

    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
  24. Why the fsck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... doesn't the US harmonise with OUR laws? WTF! Take your stinking economic imperialism and shove it up your arse.

  25. cheap CDs at last? by artg · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Hardly.
    More expensive CDs to pay for the fine, I'd have thought.

    1. Re: cheap CDs at last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More expensive CDs to pay for the fine, I'd have thought

      Errr.. no. The corps were found to be anti-competitive because they were threatening local retailers who bypassed them to import cheaper CD's.

      They could increase the cost of CD's - but that would only encourage imports. Two million dollars (Australian) isn't much anyway.

  26. TCO rather TCP by segment · · Score: 3, Informative

    Forget the total cost of ownership here, anyone ever take a look at the total cost of production of cd's and dvd's and the markups on them. While cassettes can be rather costly, and often sell for like typically 7.99 - 14.99, cd's and dvd's are made for peanuts .69 - 4.99 yet they sell for anywhere from 9.99 - * What a monopoly.

    Personally I could care less what one court says since another will go back and reverse and vice versa, but some of the record companies should tone down their bitching considering they're sticking it to the consumer %99 of the times. It's about time P2P came to bite them in the ass and give them a wake up call, and now hopefully some of the courts will too

    1. Re:TCO rather TCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cd's and dvd's are made for peanuts .69 - 4.99 yet they sell for anywhere from 9.99 - * What a monopoly.

      That was a non-sequitur. Selling your product for a huge markup does not ALWAYS mean you have a monopoly.

      However, in this case you're right. :-)

  27. I can hear... by o'reor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...the WTO/Free Trade/Free Market zealots moaning : "Yeah, okay, but these are only exceptions, see, the free market always corrects this kind of abuse by itself". The same lame excuses we heard about Enron.

    I say, if it weren't for Australian justice and anti-trust regulations, those two corporations would still be ripping off consumers. Yet, most of our countries are engaged in WTO negotiations which compell countries to get rid of those "embarrassing regulations" in the name of so-called "competition" and "fairness". I'm not saying we need more regulations; just that the existing ones need to be upheld.

    Do you see where "competition" stands when corporations agree on pricing to rip off their consumers? What about "fairness" if the existing regulations are cancelled ?
    (Robot slams door open:)
    IP droid: `By using the words "fairness" and "competition", you just infringed on Trademark #AE6521 by corporation SueMyAss Inc. We'll see you in court, sir.'

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  28. Dental Plan... by Dental+Plan · · Score: 0, Funny

    Austrailian court needs more money for braces

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. 'bout time by Stumbles · · Score: 0

    Good job Austrialian courts.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  31. Re:Another knockback for the MPAA- record UK CD sa by fuckfuck101 · · Score: 0

    alot of recording companies are suffering alot because people no longer buy singles. not only is it a complete waste of time (you can download your song and just wait till the album is out) but is completely unnecessary. album sales are increasing however, i feel there is no need for companies to claim fileswappers are losing them money, it's just a general evolution in music --people are finally waking up to the fact that they've been wasting their money all these years.

    --
    Comment: Yes I realise the username 'fuckfuck101' makes me sound intelligent, no you cannot buy it from me.
  32. The land of no principles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did you see what the Samba team said about SCO? They said that they stand behind the meaning of free software, even when it hurts (==is used by SCO)

    This is my point; the Samba team says one thing and they mean it -- they have principles and they obey them -- while the US says one thing and then go on and show that they don't really mean it at all. If "you" truly believe in capitalism and a free market, why can't you stand up for its principles? Show the world that it's right?

    The US government is helping US companies all over the world, including pressuring political change in a country just so that the mass media, food- or IT industries can cut new markets.

  33. Parallel imports outlawed in US too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Parallel imports are forbidden under US Customs regulations as well, with an exemption for travelers returning with single items that may infringe on a US trademark or copyright.
    A lot of small time record distributors routinely ignore this regulation and get cease-and-desist orders or worse when the US record company catches up with them.
    To legally make an commercial importation of a sound recording that is already owned or licensed in the USA you must have the permission of the company that currently holds the rights in the USA.

    1. Re:Parallel imports outlawed in US too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes , but in Australia Parallel imports ARE fully legal, and will remain that way. China will be our dominant trade partner, until the US beats up on them and persuades China to stop exporting as much.

      The US can't compete on Agriculture, Mining, and lumber, now wants protection on its own IP? That meets WIPO's definition of illegal dumping. (See Canadian Pharmaceutical exports).

      And they are legal because the copyright /IP holder has received a lawful payment. When you ask how much is this record, and the repsonse is 'I will tell you when you tell me your postcode ,skin color and nationality ' has nothing to do with IP.

      Stopping parallel imports will go the way of the dinosaurs.
      The link between free trade and outright racism become clearer, as it really is a disguised attempt to attach 'exclusive marketing territories' to IP, when the two are completely seperate.

      For 2.5 years Indonesian made CD's dried up. Secondly the 1.2 million dollar fine is chump change when converted into US bucks, and the consumers get naught

      If the loosers (The record companies parents) bothered to check on all the 'Asian Stores'. they would be in for a big shock.
      As long as you dont mind the foreign packaging - 8/10th's.

      Parallel importhing is good. (real, not pretend free trade is good)
      The token slap on the wrist the Australian courts gave the record Companies, is again proof American soverinty over-rides the 'law' downunder.

  34. I love a sunburnt country by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The thing about Australia is that we have little to be patriotic with, our flag is unrecognisable to most of the world, our national anthem is unknown to most Australians, everyone seems to think our capital is Sydney, our soccer team can never make it to the world cup, Fosters is synonomous with us everywhere outside Austalia but is undrinkable to most Australians, our new submarines are noisy, Paul Hogan seems to be mistaken sometimes for a national ambasitor, our Prime Minister has the charisma of a block of wood, and one of the most popular politicians in recent history was just locked up for three years because she was too stupid to understand our electoral funding laws.

    The only thing we have to be proud of is our judicial system, the guys who blocked the Gordon below Franklin damn even though blocking it was COMPLETELY unconstitutional it was just right, the guys who locked up Pauline Hanson, the guys who fined those record labels, the guys who don't give a DAMN about what the big guys say about what you can and can't do with your own stuff. They make me proud to be an Australian,

    Even though in Australia it is unpatriotic to be patriotic (or at least you are judged to be a weeny if you are). It is times like this when I would like to press my hand to my chest, salute our crappy, halfarsely designed flag, scull my VB (not Fosters, YUCK!) and sing "Advance Australia Fair" at the top of my voice (even though it was written by white supremists, at least it is not about a suicidal sheep duffer).

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:I love a sunburnt country by red_one · · Score: 1

      And then somebody reminds you of the Woomera and Baxter "illegal immigrant" detention camps.

    2. Re:I love a sunburnt country by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      So whats wrong with those? Pity more countries don't treat the tide of human scum coming from
      various bits of the world in the same way and then if these freeloaders knew they'd get a hard time
      instead of free dole money , housing etc , they might think twice about coming!

    3. Re:I love a sunburnt country by samoht · · Score: 1

      Tsk. Silly moderators. This should be +5 funny. I know non-Australians have difficulty with the extreme dryness of decent beer and Australian wit, but surely there's some Kiwis out there who can lend us your race horse. Even if we put him up in a crowded house which we'll claim to have built.

    4. Re:I love a sunburnt country by AirDave · · Score: 1

      Here and I thought the national anthem of Australia was "Tie me kangaroo down, sport".

      Mod this guy +5 Educational

    5. Re:I love a sunburnt country by jquirke · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'm an Australian, and this was the funniest thing I've read this month.

  35. Pimpin' ain't easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you like the way our US corporations can pimp and ho' out our *elected* officials! I wish I had that kind of pimp-juice...

    Playon Playa!

  36. Seems to remind me of sugar and Hawaii... by bhalter · · Score: 1

    ...The US Gov't anexed Hawaii to help US sugar interests, is Australia next??? don't those record execs deserve the government's help is shoreing up those waining profits?

  37. Yes, it is mistyped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be A$2 million or AU$2 million. You put the country before the dollar sign, not after it.

  38. But this headline is wrong . . . by Anomalous+Cowbird · · Score: 2, Informative
    As the text clearly indicates, it was the labels' fine that was doubled, not the importers'.

    (As Emily Litella would have said, "That's quite different, isn't it?")

  39. You got it ass backwards by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    The $2 million in fines were because the record companies were leaning on retailers to stop selling imported CDs.

    Rather than being a tax on imported CDs it is a punishment get the record companies to behave themselves and let retailers import CDs if they want to.

    At least with CDs the Australian government has done quite a lot over recent years to allow free trade and reduce the record companies stranglehold over supply.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  40. Urgh! by The+Head+Sage · · Score: 1

    Would the bloody american companies Sod off and die? Australians dont want our laws and copywrite acts tampered with, just because the Americans say so. This really makes me want to take over the world... Then i can lord over America..

    --
    To NULL or not to NULL.
  41. Here's your answer by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    This post gives us the mysterious missing step.
    1. Produce crap.
    2. Hope enough suckers buy it before it's categorized as crap.
    3. Profit!!!
    Soooo.... with a little modification we get:

    1. import CDs
    2. gouge consumers
    3. coerce competitors
    4. coerce governments
    5. Hope enough suckers buy it before it's categorized as crap.
    6. PROFIT!!!!

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  42. Australia, please hit them harder. by emil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am a U.S. Citizen, and I would like nothing more than to see all members of the RIAA and the MPAA dry up and blow away. I am certainly not alone in this view.

    I look upon the recent financial woes of many of these corporations with schadenfreude - pleasure at the woes of another.

    These organizations are making the US into a police state. They have orchistrated a coordinated attack upon our Bill of Rights, and they make a mockery of copyright law.

    That they are suffering now is no great surprise. May it continue.

    1. Re:Australia, please hit them harder. by willjohnson · · Score: 1
      I am a U.S. Citizen, and I would like nothing more than to see all members of the RIAA and the MPAA dry up and blow away.


      I am also a U.S. citizen. However, our justice system isn't equipped to deal with the members of the RIAA and the MPAA the way I see fit. I was thinking more along the lines of "getting medieval on their asses."
    2. Re:Australia, please hit them harder. by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      I too am a Citizen of the U.S. I am also a Constitutional Conservative and a Patriot. I am not blinded to the obvious fact that my Government sometimes behaves in an irrational manner, as in its attemps to increase the profits of the RIAA and the MPAA. This is just plain wrong. It amounts to not only screwing our international trading partners, but screwing our own citizens as well. I hope the Australian Government will kick these companies in the balls, and Her Citizens will join many of ours in boycotting the RIAA and MPAA. Give 'em hell, Aussies!

  43. They may not be pushing hard by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Informative

    but sometimes a softer approach works, the less this is "news" the better.

    A few weeks ago I heard that they (ie the American government) were trying to get the Australian content quotas on our radio stations reduced under the banner of "free trade".

    Of course that's total garbage. Our airwaves are a national resource and it is entirely reasonable to ensure they are exploited for the national good. People can't just waltz in from anywhere and exploit our mineral or land and the airwaves shouldn't be any different.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  44. Bah! by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yeah, I'd post anonymously, too, if I were going to belch a flame like that.

    Americans only like free markets and capitalism when it works in their favor.

    The fact is some of us yanks like to see the these goons get sorted out. There's stuff that costs absurd amounts, or you can't even get in the US, thanks to restrictions on importing bought to us by the very same sphere of influence. They like to get money whether things are coming or going.

    Some people like to refer to them as F.O.B. (friends of Bush), but they actually manage to get strings pulled their way no matter who the Prez is.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Bah! by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Ok, so maybe he should have said "Americans in power" only like free markets when it works in their favor, then? Amounts to the same thing for all practical intents, until our government starts listening to people again instead of corporate interests.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Bah! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Ok, so maybe he should have said "Americans in power" only like free markets when it works in their favor, then? Amounts to the same thing for all practical intents, until our government starts listening to people again instead of corporate interests.

      Right. And Bertelsmann AG is an american company. Vivendi is an american company. Sony is an american company. Even Motown is owned (last I read) by a dutch group. See where I'm going with this?

      Let me spell it out for you. Great chunks of "american" IP and industry are foreign owned. It is globalization, but not eminating from inside the US. The US is just a convenient strawman. Some people tend to forget there is considerable foreign interest in who gets elected and what policy is. I'm not talking about some stupid super-secret-pact-o'-evil, like conspiracy theorists invent, but the fact there's old money in the world and those people who control it like to look after it. The US is just a very convenient playfield, since it has a large economy, lots of unwitting (and not less than a few corrupt ones) political decision makers and legislation authors, and a big bad military to back it all up with.

      Things aren't actually as bad as they used to be, with the overt toppling of unsympathetic democratically elected governments which nationalize wide foreign holdings to look after their own people. But this exportation of law is something which requires close scrutiny by peoples of other nations to be sure someone isn't using the leverage of the US to screw them.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Things aren't actually as bad as they used to be, with the overt toppling of unsympathetic democratically elected governments which nationalize wide foreign holdings to look after their own people.

      Yeah, Milosevic was toppled covertly... oh wait, no he wasn't.

      Yeah there was deception involved, but what's new there?

  45. HEX them! by CognitiveFusion · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else have their brain register $162 million when you read $A2 million?

    --
    Fools ignore complexity; pragmatists suffer it; experts avoid it; geniuses remove it. ~A. Perlis
  46. silence! by asv108 · · Score: 1

    If you speak up again, Trotskyite, you will be sent to the gulag for crimes against the state.

    1. Re:silence! by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      What, the australian penal colonies?

    2. Re:silence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What, the australian penal colonies?

      You mean New Zealand?

  47. Apparently it is illegal by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never seen anyone adequately explain why but there are indeed cases where people get done for parallel importing DVDs for resale.

    I can understand why it might be a breach of the Classification act as what you are selling may not have passed through the required rating procedure.

    But I can't understand how the sale of something can be a breach of copyright.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  48. More than $2 million... by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    The court also doubled the labels' fine - and the fines for senior label executives - to more than $A2 million.

    It's obvious that to save a bit of space, the article poster wrote the fine in hexidecimal. So the actual fine works out to be
    10 x 16 + 2 = $162 MILLION. That's pretty friggin' high.

  49. Oh yeah, the community reals owns the industry by ShatteredDream · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah right. It's the private property of the government, not you. If the people really were the government in Britain, Britain probably would not have gone into Iraq. Face it, your "we are the democracy, we are the government" bullshit is nothing more than wishful thinking.

    1. Re:Oh yeah, the community reals owns the industry by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Yeah right. It's the private property of the government, not you. If the people really were the government in Britain,

      The parent post didn't claim that. Ask an average Brit if they think Tony Blair's government is socialist.

    2. Re:Oh yeah, the community reals owns the industry by Thjorska · · Score: 1

      I'm an average Brit, and I'd say it's more of a fascist/oligatorship.

      An oligatorship, by the by, for those of you who don't know, is the few ruling the many. The power-holders, the businessmen, the politicians, etc. Sound... familiar?

      --
      Current Karma Status: Roadkill
  50. Harmonise by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    I always thought that meant changing them both to be the same thing not us adopting US laws.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  51. All I said is I like our court system by donscarletti · · Score: 1
    The Australian high court ruled that indefinite detention in these two places is unconstitutional

    Like I said before, our polititions are dickheads, but our courts are great. Personally, I don't care if they are fairly bland seeming, I don't care how many gay hookers Michael Kirby did or didn't pick up in how many government cars, I wouldn't even care if they found me guilty of murder (if I did it of course). I have a deep respect for those guys, and I believe that until they are mainly replaced they will keep making nice decisions.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:All I said is I like our court system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell can you respect our legal system? It's corrupt and full of shit.

      How can Hanson get locked up for 3 years, effectively becoming a martyr, for an administrative error whilst someone like Nemer gets fined a couple of hundred dollars for shooting a man in the face because going to jail would 'not aid development of his character'?

      How can the daughter of the foreign minister get fined a couple of hundred dollars and lose her license for a few months for doing 165km/h in a 100km/h zone in her daddy's ss commodore and I get fined a couple of hundred for only going 10km/h over the limit?

      Why do they drop the charges against a corrupt politician who ripped-off the australian public to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars because the poor fat pig "has only a couple of months to live" - yet then continues to live to this very day, complete with his disgustingly generous parliametary superannuation payouts?

      It seems like it's almost every day that we hear of outrageous rulings and sentencings being made by judges, decisions which show their contempt for contemporary society and their bias towards their own socialist do-gooder world view. Illegal immigrant detention centres are illegal - what a fucking joke! What gives them the right to decide that illegal entrants to our country have the same, or greater, rights than our own citizens!?

      The time is drawing near for when we, the decent people of Australia, will have to stand up for ourselves and take back, using whatever means necessary, the government and legal systems that are so out of control and corrupt.

    2. Re:All I said is I like our court system by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      How can Hanson get locked up for 3 years, effectively becoming a martyr, for an administrative error ... ?

      OK, that one's a witch hunt, pure and simple. But, you must admit, as one of the two "responsible persons" for the political party, seeing as the party was found guilty of fraud, she's the one who should pay.

      How can the daughter of the foreign minister get fined a couple of hundred dollars and lose her license for a few months for doing 165km/h in a 100km/h zone in her daddy's ss commodore and I get fined a couple of hundred for only going 10km/h over the limit?

      Did you get locked up? No?, So your offense was less than hers, and at cost you less. The actual $$$ value is just a matter of degree. What's the problem?

      Why do they drop the charges against a corrupt politician who ripped-off the australian public to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars because the poor fat pig "has only a couple of months to live" - yet then continues to live to this very day, complete with his disgustingly generous parliametary superannuation payouts?

      DPP decision, not a judge's / court decision. In case you haven't worked it out, the DPP is a quasi-political arm, not as fiercely independent as the rest of the legal system.

      ... Illegal immigrant detention centres are illegal - what a fucking joke! What gives them the right to decide that illegal entrants to our country have the same, or greater, rights than our own citizens!?

      Who wants to give them the same or greater rights? Nobody; the courts are just saying "hey, they're people, don't treat them like shit!". Remember how we treated the refugees from Kosovo? "Come to our country, it's safe! / OK, now America has pulled out so it's safe at home, now fuck off before we lock you up permanently". Lovely...

      The time is drawing near for when we, the decent people of Australia, will have to stand up for ourselves and take back, using whatever means necessary, the government and legal systems that are so out of control and corrupt.

      Ah yes, the "decent people". Unlike those scumsucking politicians, commo pinky judges, dirty abos, lazy dole bludgers, filthy immigrants, and puppy-munching asians which are destroying our way of life, overrunning our cities, and looking lustingly at our wives.

      Bet I can guess which party you voted for ;-)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    3. Re:All I said is I like our court system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How can Hanson get locked up for 3 years,
      > effectively becoming a martyr, for an
      > administrative error
      Whoa, you can't simply dismiss it as an administrative error. It was electoral fraud, not just normal fraud. Remember when One Nation required members to sign and submit a resignation form upon joining the party.

      Hanson and the Davids abused electoral laws in an attempt to create an undemocratic party. One could argue that three years was too much, but it wasn't simply an administrative error.

    4. Re:All I said is I like our court system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, the "decent people". Unlike those scumsucking politicians, commo pinky judges, dirty abos, lazy dole bludgers, filthy immigrants, and puppy-munching asians which are destroying our way of life, overrunning our cities, and looking lustingly at our wives.

      You've hit the nail exactly on the head there. Everywhere I go now, it seems like us whites are the minority. And abo's are stinky... have you ever been to an abo community in the NT? I had to have shots before going.


      Bet I can guess which party you voted for ;-)


      Really? What was your guess? Because I vote Liberal. Funny how they've copied Hanson's stance on immigration and now atsic :)

  52. Dont take our music! by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    If they take all the pirated music away thered be nothing to buy at the markets but pirated games, videos and clothing. :(

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  53. Non-RIAA classical CDs by oboeaaron · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you like classical, and want to support a record company that "gets it," check out Naxos (www.naxos.com). They cover both standard and exotic repertoire; many pieces in their catalog are not available anywhere else. The website has full-length streams of their recordings (WMP format, unfortunately). Best of all, they are unaffiliated with the RIAA and all their CDs are $7.99USD or lower. I'm not affiliated in any way with them, just a satisfied customer who wants to see them flourish.

    --
    Journey onward.
  54. ummm dudes by plastik55 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The headline says the opposite of what the article says.

    Let me guess, we have people who are PAID to edit here?

    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    1. Re:ummm dudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Let me guess, we have people who are PAID to edit here?"

      No, they blew the payroll budget on the million monkeys.

  55. NOT depressing by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

    What is depressing about this?

    The RIAA will have to pay double fines for their past abuse. This is good news.

    The RIAA will raise dues to member companies. Good. Make those suckers pay.

    The member companies will in turn raise CD prices to pay those fines.

    The net effect: you will pay more on CD's in order to correct for having paid too much on CD's in the past. It's good news for everyone.

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    1. Re:NOT depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You forgot the last two steps.

      Sales on CDs will go down sas prices go up

      RIAA will blame further drop in sales on piracy.

  56. More people by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Easy. USA has bigger population; therefore, assuming equal technology producing an equal GDP per capita, USA can produce a greater GDP. GDP is leverage in trade issues. Therefore, USA can almost dictate the terms of trade.

    Perhaps if the British Empire hadn't broke up, it'd have more people, and...

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  57. ACCC et al.. by jamesjw · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Comission) http://www.accc.gov.au has been lobbying for the right of DVD and Sony Playstation owners to import discs from other regions, see: ACCC Defends the Rights of Playstation Owners

    I know that in the case of Playstation discs, Sony won a case recently that basically has made modding Playstations in Australia for playing any kind of disc (pirate or import) illegal.
    But the DVD Region code issue has been in the press here alot, IANAL but I believe due to the actions of the ACCC, Multi region DVD players here are quite common in the retail market to give consumers choice, I guess its up to the DVD Player manifacturer weather they include the feature or not.

    Personally my PHILIPS DVD-707 is modded All region from the remote and I own a number of Region 1 titles that just arent available locally here.
    I'm all for import CD's too, alot of Japanese releases come with extra tracks and collectors packaging that if imports were banned, we'd never get to see (legally).


    To a point as a consumer, I dont mind if the disc costs me the same as here or even a bit extra, but we should get the choice to buy the product we want, expecially if the product offers features not included on the domestic release.

    Jim.

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
  58. the joy of Hex by vkevlar · · Score: 1
    Did anyone else read the settlement value as $162 million?

    ...
    Just checking.

  59. CDs are CHEAP (to manufacture) in Australia by ahacop@wmuc.umd.edu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I find it rather odd that imported CDs are cheaper in Australia.

    I run an independent record label and I get my CDs manufactured in Australia precisely because it is CHEAPER for me to do so!

  60. Free trade and parallel importation by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Mr Aldonis' comments came despite the US raising concerns about parallel importation legislation in its 2003 Foreign Trade Barriers report. Parallel importation permits the importation of a product by a person other than the local authorised distributor.

    The US Trade Representative warned parallel importation had led to increasing piracy of DVDs and VCDs."

    The US maintains that importing identical commerical copies of music or video from another country is equivalent to piracy? What balderdash.

    To put this is perspective, if a company in China found a better deal on wheat in the Ukraine than what their "authorised distrubutor" of American wheat in China could offer them, then that company engaged in wheat piracy?

    I am of the mistaken belief that free trade was meant to foster GLOBAL trade, not regional cartels.

    Authorised Distributor is now another term for MONOPOLY. What a hypocrital nation the US has become.

  61. it's capitalism by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    You may think it is merchantilism but it is not. Even the captialists themselves claim to be running capitalism therefore the system is capitalism. For instance, the US govt considers themselves to be capitalists. Also, nearly every economist (modern day economists are mostly capitalist) claims the current system is capitalism.

    In any case, the capitalism you seek will never exist because some entity (person, corporation, whatever) will horde resource and become powerful. It is in the interest of companies to become monopolies (or at worst, oligopolies).

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    1. Re:it's capitalism by sirbone · · Score: 1

      This is a rather short-sighted claim. Just because the people in charge call it "capitalism" does not mean it is such. The USA PATRIOT Act is not very patriotic even though those in power say it is. Insoc's Ministry of Truth ("1984") was not at all about truth despite what the Inner Party said. Mercantilism is definined as a system where government controls the economy for the purpose of increasing wealth. Capitalism is defined as privately owned transactions free from government intervention. Just because Bush's or Clinton's "Ministry of Truth" says otherwise does not make it so, unless you write in Newspeak.

      Republican != Capitalist
      Democrat != Capitalist

      --
      "The State is that great fiction by which everyone lives at the expense of everyone else." -Frederic Bastiat.
    2. Re:it's capitalism by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      We aren't talking about one entity trying to define the system; we have a case where nearly everyone (including economists who are hardcore capitalists that will sell their soul for capitalism) claim it to be capitalism. Therefore it IS capitalism.

      I think what you are referring to is PURE capitalism which is the utlimate form of capitalism. In any case, USA is on a path towards pure capitalism.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  62. read between the lines by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    When you read newspaper articles, press releases, or anything where a govt or coporate spokesperson is involved, you have to differentiate between what they say and what they mean.

    For instnace, when the US Trade official says "America would not be pushing too hard...", well it doesn't mean that USA dropped its origianal goal. It simply downgraded it and is moving more slowly. Often, this involves "buying out" foreign government (via counter-proposals, trade compromises, etc).

    If the US official had said "America would not be pushing at all" then it's another story...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  63. these corporations actually benefit you by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    The reason nothing happens in USA isbecause these corporations are part of USA and hence benefit US citizens. Of course, the fact taht only a tiny fraction gains the benefits is irrelevant. That's how plutocracies work and I would rate USA at 90% on the plutocracy scale :(

    Sivaram Velatuhapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  64. Should have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I, being former military, am ashamed of our government right now."

  65. Multi-zone DVD players are legal in Oz, by pbjones · · Score: 1

    Multi-zone DVD players are legal in Oz, you can have whatever DVD that you want in Oz. But who wants to see more US crap on DVD.?

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  66. Really by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

    Another reader notes that the U.S. government is busy trying to get Australia to change its laws to increase the profits of U.S. record companies.

    You mean that their profits aren't enough already with what we (Australians) are charged?

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!
  67. Ffellow commonwealthers, fight! by MainframeKiller · · Score: 1

    the U.S. government is busy trying to get Australia to change its laws to increase the profits of U.S. record companies

    Thank God my Australian cousins (I'm Canadian) are fighting for our rights to be free of American imperialism and hegemony!

    Now all you Australian folks out there, join me in singing God save the Queen!

    Relax my Yankee friends, we love you guys! :)

    --
    http://www.club977.com/ - The 80's Channel!
    Your source for commercial free 80's music!