lets bring back the disembowelling of those that have alternative religious doctrines.
disingenuous isn't the word for your post. you list dates when you stopped enslaving white people. and your attitude sounds as if you long for the almost barbaric middle ages.
exactly where did all the plantation owners of the 1700s +/- come from? and where did the profits and taxes go back to? hmmm let me think about that for a while.
if using windows, at 12pm click on the little red 'x' in the upper right corner of your email client, then, right click on the smiley face in your task bar and select 'exit'
at 1pm select 'start' -> 'thunderbird' and then 'start' ->...
well hopefully you get the idea by now.
all programmers should start with wiring 7400 series nand gates and work up from there.
i don't think the modern humanized aspects of programming languages are inheritantly evil, but to start at that level and never comprehend what is going on across the wires is a mistake.
still haven't found the tech article but this is similar to what it was talking about...
"There was no salvation in using more than one steam engine on a single train, except in situations where extra power was needed for only a short distance, e.g., climbing a mountain grade. In normal operations, two steam engines would waste energy fighting against each other."
My memory of the exact quote is quite poor. I believe it was from a tech magazing in the early 90's and I have been unable to find it on the internet (although I haven't looked that hard).
It may have been more along the lines of the locomotives themselves... you cannot hook two steam powered locomotives together and get additional pulling power. I don't know... sorry for the vagueness.
Some people have predicted this move for quite some time. I remember hearing about it back in the late 80's early 90's and I'm sure it goes way back before then.
The analogy was to Steam Engines and why they lost out over Diesels. You can only make a Steam engine so big but you cannot connect them together to get more power. With diesels you can hook many of them together for more power.
Chips are finally getting to the same point -- It is more cost efficient to chain them together than to create a monsterous one.
I'm surprised it has take this long to get to this point.
...and I seem to recall it doing fairly well.
Regardless of you who are, you have to make things people want to see - and be able to market it. I suppose if we were in a less free country we could all be force to watch crap. But instead we are in a free country where it is perfectly acceptable for marketers to use the ploys of their trade to make you watch their crap.
back in the 80s or early 90s i saw an article by someone which the gist was "processors will have to change architectures just like trains had to switch from steam engine to diesel"....
you could theoretically build a single steam engine that was more powerful than a single diesel engine but you could not hook two steam engines together.
looks like we've finally just about hit the limit as to where a single processor can take us in regards to speed... from now on it will be chip architectures that can easily be chained together that will have the advantage.
Slashdot Mirror
hey why not a celebration of your culture?
lets bring back the disembowelling of those that have alternative religious doctrines.
disingenuous isn't the word for your post. you list dates when you stopped enslaving white people. and your attitude sounds as if you long for the almost barbaric middle ages.
exactly where did all the plantation owners of the 1700s +/- come from? and where did the profits and taxes go back to? hmmm let me think about that for a while.
no one has talked about whether this guy is 1099 or W-2 employee. i think it makes a big difference (in respect to tax law).
http://www.yahoo.com/?weruiosahfsroiwehrfsafayewri uweiuryasuhfiudsahfiuyrfyeqwiuryiuwqyfdiusahdfsadh fguyyertqewrywiquyeriahsfhdsifgetryeqrriugsidfhgsa dgfhiuywiuegrfwtegfyags
if using windows, at 12pm click on the little red 'x' in the upper right corner of your email client, then, right click on the smiley face in your task bar and select 'exit' at 1pm select 'start' -> 'thunderbird' and then 'start' -> ...
well hopefully you get the idea by now.
i agree.
t m
all programmers should start with wiring 7400 series nand gates and work up from there.
i don't think the modern humanized aspects of programming languages are inheritantly evil, but to start at that level and never comprehend what is going on across the wires is a mistake.
http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/components/74series.h
i did not rta but what is the other option besides "illegal" and "legal" downloads? (35% + 40% != 100%)
that is unbelievable.
someone has way too much time on their hands.
still haven't found the tech article but this is similar to what it was talking about...
...it makes the analogy even weaker but oh well...
"There was no salvation in using more than one steam engine on a single train, except in situations where extra power was needed for only a short distance, e.g., climbing a mountain grade. In normal operations, two steam engines would waste energy fighting against each other."
http://yardlimit.railfan.net/guide/locopaper.html
My memory of the exact quote is quite poor. I believe it was from a tech magazing in the early 90's and I have been unable to find it on the internet (although I haven't looked that hard).
It may have been more along the lines of the locomotives themselves... you cannot hook two steam powered locomotives together and get additional pulling power. I don't know... sorry for the vagueness.
Some people have predicted this move for quite some time. I remember hearing about it back in the late 80's early 90's and I'm sure it goes way back before then. The analogy was to Steam Engines and why they lost out over Diesels. You can only make a Steam engine so big but you cannot connect them together to get more power. With diesels you can hook many of them together for more power. Chips are finally getting to the same point -- It is more cost efficient to chain them together than to create a monsterous one. I'm surprised it has take this long to get to this point.
even more concerning is that someone moderated me "insightful"
sorry i forgot the "sarcasm" tag.
Yeah, I put that MP3 out on my personal website for MY OWN usage not yours. It's your problem if you download it. Thief.
Kinda like if I leave my car unlocked on a public street it doesn't mean I'm giving permission for someone to come along and steal it.
Hmm...
...and I seem to recall it doing fairly well. Regardless of you who are, you have to make things people want to see - and be able to market it. I suppose if we were in a less free country we could all be force to watch crap. But instead we are in a free country where it is perfectly acceptable for marketers to use the ploys of their trade to make you watch their crap.
back in the 80s or early 90s i saw an article by someone which the gist was "processors will have to change architectures just like trains had to switch from steam engine to diesel"....
you could theoretically build a single steam engine that was more powerful than a single diesel engine but you could not hook two steam engines together.
looks like we've finally just about hit the limit as to where a single processor can take us in regards to speed... from now on it will be chip architectures that can easily be chained together that will have the advantage.