Slashdot Mirror


User: BistroMath

BistroMath's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10

  1. Oh, the irony... on DARPATech Shows off Robot Doc and Cancer Breathalyzer · · Score: 1

    of /.-ers whining about the agency (DARPA) directly responsible for the invention of the Internet, using the Internet.

  2. Re:Curious on New Insights into Synesthesia · · Score: 1

    Synasthetes function just as everyone else. The condition
    tends to superimpose the sensation over normal perception.
    For instance, a friend of mine sees black and white text
    as if it were color. This is, in fact, not to her detriment,
    but rather a boon, because the colors that appear over
    a particular word do not change over time. She can grasp
    the mood of a paragraph just by looking at it, and she can
    use it to read large volumes in an amazingly short time.
    Synasthesia is rarely fatal :)

  3. Re:even if they do read other's work... on Scientists Don't Read the Papers They Cite · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, OK. I'll try it:

    1. Read /. headline
    2. Form angry, uninformed opinion.
    3. Post
    4. ????
    5. Karma!

    Doing science for the money is like having sex for
    the exercise. There are many other ways to make considerably more money that require
    far less work. The raison d'etre of science is the joy
    of discovery; no one spends 6-8 years in higher education
    getting a PhD just for the paycheck. People do it
    because they love it.

    As far as scientists faking results, yes, it happens.
    However, the beauty of the scientific method is that
    it is self-policing. Anyone can read the journals;
    anyone can write the editors of said journals and
    report anything that's not above board. As for papers
    not being read in the first place, well, let's hop on
    the Magic School Bus and take a quick tour of the
    scientific publishing process.

    First, write the paper. Then, submit it to either a
    journal or a conference. In either case, the pool
    of available papers will be divided over the number
    of people on the review board of the respective
    journal/conference, so a bunch of people read a few
    papers. Once here, the aforementioned paper is either
    rejected or accepted. If accepted, it is published.

    After the paper is published, other scientists read
    the paper. If it is useful for their work, they may
    incorporate some of the ideas into their own work,
    at which point, they'll test the idea that they're
    borrowing to see if it makes sense.
    If it does make sense, they'll use it. If not, they'll
    tell the whole world, discrediting the work and
    embarassing the original author. Thus there is plenty
    of pressure to do good science. The people doing legitimate
    work far outnumber the charlatans just submitting
    gibberish.

    Matt

  4. Please use metaphors that make sense on Digital Biology · · Score: 2, Informative

    Two of the four diseases the author mentions, ie anthrax and tuberculosis, are caused by bacteria and not viruses.

  5. Evil, even? on Honda's ASIMO A Few Steps Closer To Human · · Score: 1

    The article mentions that Asimo (pronounced Ahsh-mo) translates to "legs, even" or, more precisely, "legs, too". However, due to the large number of homophones in the Japanese language, the first part of the name (Asi) also translates as "evil". So, this robot is "evil, even".

    Bistromath

  6. Re:This whole issue is grey on "sucks".com Sites Win Legal Victory · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm sure you could try to make all trademark-holders register under .tm, but the people of Turkmenistan might get a little upset...

  7. Re:Open Source CensorWare? on The Breaking of Cyber Patrol 4 · · Score: 1

    There is an open source censorware project called Active Guardian (www.activeguardian.com) that does everything you mentioned. It can use PICS ratings, keyword lists and allow/block URL lists (which come with defaults but are completely customizable), in any combination. Combined with a web-based configuration tool and the fact that it runs on Linux, this is a cost-effective and open solution that is probably what many schools are seeking for their networks.

  8. Re:Y2K yes, New Millenium NO on Y2K Rollover - Post Your Experiences Here! · · Score: 1

    Don't be so pedantic next time.

    The Gregorian calendar was implemented in 1582 by Pope Greorary XIII, who, by papal decree, ordered 10 days to be dropped from the end of October, to return the vernal equinox to its rightful place around March 20.

    Millennium has two n's in it.

    Diet Dr. Pepper really does taste more like regular Dr. Pepper.

    And so on...

    Happy New Year!

  9. Re:FLAMEBAIT HERE PLEASE on When Does Y2K Begin? · · Score: 1

    For intellectual discourse on why you should be partying both this year and next year, see Stephen Jay Gould's Questioning the Millennium. In it, he discusses why our system of time is so arbitrary, how the Gregorian calendar was designed and implemented, and why there is no year zero. He also proves that anyone who gets huffy about this year not being the "correct" start of the new millennium needs to be getting out more. And, this celebration offers just such an opportunity.

    Have Fun!

    Bistromath

  10. University of Pittsburgh on Ask Slashdot: Comp-Sci Graduate Schools · · Score: 1

    The University of Pittsburgh has one of the oldest computer science departments in the US, and has both excellent grad and undergrad programs. Plus, Pitt students can take classes from CMU, and vice versa.

    Hail to Pitt!

    Bistromath