I don't like to use the word "Hispanic". That is a trigger word that enables all sorts of microaggressive behavior. I am rather offended you used that word.
You forgot to mention that due to the enablement of microaggressive behavior the cisgender white males in IT are enabled to exclude others. This triggering behavior shouldn't be tolerated in 2016. By introducing the concepts of hug boxes and safe spaces in IT we can make it more inclusive and even more profitable for everyone!
...in all the ads they showed during the event, they ALL were of ONLY black men and white women. Not an Asian or Indian to be seen anywhere in them. Really outrageous!
You are right. Why rush things? We have been launching things into LEO with chemical rockets for about 60 years now. We still have a lot to learn about it. It might take another 60 to make it reliable enough to launch people reliably. Who knows at this point?
Don't be so negative. 2050 is probably more realistic to have a semi-permanent base on the moon. Assuming the economy hasn't completely collapsed by then.
You are dumb. The only reason there isn't someone beating you over the head right now and stealing your laptop is because there is a non-negligible chance that they might actually get caught by the police. Your local police need to take a day off. You will find out how much your "life matters".
That is essentially how people in the IT/software industry think. It is easy to change strategy and approach with software. You just change the code. However that doesn't fly in other fields. You can't just say "shit well they died so lets try again with version 2.1 beta and see if it kills fewer people." Well actually I guess you CAN say that.
I just am always shocked at the stupidity and naiveté displayed by Space and AI nutters like you. You have no grasp on reality. I should let you guys wallow in your ignorance, but thats no fun.
Exactly. If they allow morons like me to drive, then they allow anyone. I don't know why you are attacking me, anyway. Space and AI nutters are the worst.
Because airplanes have actual highly trained "drivers" in them, and know what an autopilot of capable of, and cars are driven by stupid fuckwits like you. The average driver doesn't know that autonomous cars are a pipe dream at this point, especially with supposedly knowledgeable tech people claiming it is right around the corner.
That isn't the point: they will twist it to make it sound like they were negligent with the previous version of the software. I am inclined to agree with that: Tesla is dumb to even call it "autopilot". Self driving cars is a very hard problem to solve and likely will never be solved as long as there are non-autonomous cars on the road. Typical arrogance.
I don't propose anything. I don't know how to do it. That is NASAs job to figure it out. Apparently they don't know how to do it either. They are still trying to answer the question "Did Mars have the capability to support life?" which is a good goal too, but after the nth mission people are going to get tired of that, especially since they haven't answered that question yet. My guess is that Mars never supported life either, but based on what we know so far you can't tell.
This is true for some software, but not all. Not all types of software are equal. Games take a lot of money and people to produce. It is unlikely that "free" software will succeed in that area. However for IMPORTANT software, the GPL works because there is some funding available. There is one saving grace here: digital computers are not going to improve at the same rate they have in the past. The AAA titles you play now will be very similar to the ones you play 10 years from now, simply because processor speed isn't increasing at a high rate.
Slashdot Mirror
I find the term "Latin America" offensive. We don't even speak Latin here. I'm off to my Safe Space!
Agreed. What he SHOULD have said was "Diversity is important to us here at Apple. We will look into the issues you brought up as soon as possible."
I don't like to use the word "Hispanic". That is a trigger word that enables all sorts of microaggressive behavior. I am rather offended you used that word.
You forgot to mention that due to the enablement of microaggressive behavior the cisgender white males in IT are enabled to exclude others. This triggering behavior shouldn't be tolerated in 2016. By introducing the concepts of hug boxes and safe spaces in IT we can make it more inclusive and even more profitable for everyone!
...in all the ads they showed during the event, they ALL were of ONLY black men and white women. Not an Asian or Indian to be seen anywhere in them. Really outrageous!
I just mean we need to make sure it doesn't explode prematurely.
How confusing. So is he saying that only SpaceX should be trying at this point? Why is he being sarcastic?
You are right. Why rush things? We have been launching things into LEO with chemical rockets for about 60 years now. We still have a lot to learn about it. It might take another 60 to make it reliable enough to launch people reliably. Who knows at this point?
If it is more reliable than any alternative it is a HUGE improvement. Size and thrust isn't everything. Trust me!
Don't be so negative. 2050 is probably more realistic to have a semi-permanent base on the moon. Assuming the economy hasn't completely collapsed by then.
Exactly. There is no harm in having multiple competing designs. It is preferable actually. As long as everyone is honest about expectations.
If you mean Mars, Pennsylvania you are right. How would SpaceX build a HQ on Mars in 10 years?
No, they should work in parallel. That way the best design wins, or at least there is an alternative. It is a win-win.
This is a more realistic goal: a reusable orbital rocket to be launched around 10 years from now.
You are dumb. The only reason there isn't someone beating you over the head right now and stealing your laptop is because there is a non-negligible chance that they might actually get caught by the police. Your local police need to take a day off. You will find out how much your "life matters".
I can confirm: he is an idiot. Just kidding. He is just ignorant.
That is essentially how people in the IT/software industry think. It is easy to change strategy and approach with software. You just change the code. However that doesn't fly in other fields. You can't just say "shit well they died so lets try again with version 2.1 beta and see if it kills fewer people." Well actually I guess you CAN say that.
I just am always shocked at the stupidity and naiveté displayed by Space and AI nutters like you. You have no grasp on reality. I should let you guys wallow in your ignorance, but thats no fun.
Exactly. If they allow morons like me to drive, then they allow anyone. I don't know why you are attacking me, anyway. Space and AI nutters are the worst.
Uh, obviously. I'm sure you are attempting to be sarcastic, but you just proved my point.
Because airplanes have actual highly trained "drivers" in them, and know what an autopilot of capable of, and cars are driven by stupid fuckwits like you. The average driver doesn't know that autonomous cars are a pipe dream at this point, especially with supposedly knowledgeable tech people claiming it is right around the corner.
That isn't the point: they will twist it to make it sound like they were negligent with the previous version of the software. I am inclined to agree with that: Tesla is dumb to even call it "autopilot". Self driving cars is a very hard problem to solve and likely will never be solved as long as there are non-autonomous cars on the road. Typical arrogance.
Exactly. Lawyers are going to love that comment.
I don't propose anything. I don't know how to do it. That is NASAs job to figure it out. Apparently they don't know how to do it either. They are still trying to answer the question "Did Mars have the capability to support life?" which is a good goal too, but after the nth mission people are going to get tired of that, especially since they haven't answered that question yet. My guess is that Mars never supported life either, but based on what we know so far you can't tell.
This is true for some software, but not all. Not all types of software are equal. Games take a lot of money and people to produce. It is unlikely that "free" software will succeed in that area. However for IMPORTANT software, the GPL works because there is some funding available. There is one saving grace here: digital computers are not going to improve at the same rate they have in the past. The AAA titles you play now will be very similar to the ones you play 10 years from now, simply because processor speed isn't increasing at a high rate.