... is also a "tad bit obvious", as every system reporting tool will gladly show you that your screen recording software is chewing up resources for no apparent reason. If the NSA wanted in to your machine they'd use a backdoor or exploit to gain access, then install their own software which you'd not recognise.
It's not the perfect app, though, as everyone knows it's there. There is no such thing as the perfect app, but perfect backdoor (through which actors put their unknown malicious app). If this hypothetical backdoor exists (still waiting for concrete evidence of that, by the way), then the NSA would simply use it to install their own screen-recording software, and get your goodies that way.
Come on, you can do better. I know bashing Microsoft is fun, but when you have to resort to childish hypothetical situations to bash them, you end up bashing yourself instead.
I know, right?! It's as if they respect the scientific method and humans in general. So fucked up! Next they'll be telling us marching around in blackface shouting "oh lawdy!" is not cool!
It does look a bit dodgy, I agree. I thought the same thing when I read the name. I then looked on the internet, and there is at least one Kelvin Wells living in Germany. Whether he is German or not I don't know, but that seems good enough.
Apart from all the superchargers being built out, the battery swap technology in the works, and the fact that the vast majority of drivers don't want to drive more than a full charge per day, you are absolutely correct in your appraisal.
You are showing your ignorance once more. The soil in Canada and Siberia are terrible for farming, and so moving agriculture there will do fuck all. Plus the increase in CO2 means the crop yields will drop, meaning more farming has to take place in order to support the required number of people. Not to mention the complete lack of infrastructure, and that you're calling for farming to be moved across country lines, which never ends well (see: all of history).
You appear to have a spotty surface understanding of this problem, yet get confused about anything else. You really should fix your education, as it's embarrassing.
Have you learned the difference between land ice and sea ice yet? I love how you laugh out loud at others, yet make amateur mistakes again and again and again.
And all the evidence points to you being wrong. What happens in your part of the world does not imply what's happening in the rest of the world. This is basic stuff.
So you don't understand why the corrections are made. Gotcha. I respect how much energy you have, but I find your disdain and wilful ignorance disgusting. What a waste of a brain.
Can you link to the actual rebuttal? To their paper which shows this peer-reviewed research to be faulty? No? Weird. I guess if all you have are some flapping heads on your side, you might want to reconsider your position.
If they have evidence, they won't be shouted down. That's the whole thing. One can't substitute evidence with anger or zeal - if they don't have the evidence, they get shouted down. That's how science has worked this far, and it's telling that when it happens in this field it's a problem, but when it happens in every other field it's perfectly normal, and even expected.
Al Gore is a politician. He has nothing to do with whether AGW is real or not. Mentioning him isn't going to make you look particularly rational:)
I do know this as a fact, as it's in the fucking video! You'd know it too, if you paid attention. And as for the other 13 accidents, well, who knows - we're discussing this crash here, as we have the data for it.
Yes, your perfect human being, prepared and ready for an accident, might be able to think outside the box, but then so can a bunch of engineers with millions of miles of road data, and their solutions will be far better implemented in their cars than by some distracted, poorly-trained, Dunningâ"Kruger driver. So yeah - people can probably think of better ways to avoid or lessen these impacts, but then those ways can be implemented in software, so we are back to square one: The cars are better drivers than people.
Slashdot Mirror
... is also a "tad bit obvious", as every system reporting tool will gladly show you that your screen recording software is chewing up resources for no apparent reason. If the NSA wanted in to your machine they'd use a backdoor or exploit to gain access, then install their own software which you'd not recognise.
It's not the perfect app, though, as everyone knows it's there. There is no such thing as the perfect app, but perfect backdoor (through which actors put their unknown malicious app). If this hypothetical backdoor exists (still waiting for concrete evidence of that, by the way), then the NSA would simply use it to install their own screen-recording software, and get your goodies that way.
Come on, you can do better. I know bashing Microsoft is fun, but when you have to resort to childish hypothetical situations to bash them, you end up bashing yourself instead.
You can't really be this stupid, right?
I know, right?! It's as if they respect the scientific method and humans in general. So fucked up! Next they'll be telling us marching around in blackface shouting "oh lawdy!" is not cool!
You sound single.
It does look a bit dodgy, I agree. I thought the same thing when I read the name. I then looked on the internet, and there is at least one Kelvin Wells living in Germany. Whether he is German or not I don't know, but that seems good enough.
So the study is just a bunch of half-baked bullshit, never once approaching an accurate view of the reality it purports to lay bare. And you love it.
Don't kid yourself - you are looking at the present and are completely unaware of what's being planned for the future. Big shock.
Seeing as lithium can be produced without any mining what so ever, I'd say your question is entirely nonsensical.
You should, as then you could read just how flawed the study is.
Apart from all the superchargers being built out, the battery swap technology in the works, and the fact that the vast majority of drivers don't want to drive more than a full charge per day, you are absolutely correct in your appraisal.
You are showing your ignorance once more. The soil in Canada and Siberia are terrible for farming, and so moving agriculture there will do fuck all. Plus the increase in CO2 means the crop yields will drop, meaning more farming has to take place in order to support the required number of people. Not to mention the complete lack of infrastructure, and that you're calling for farming to be moved across country lines, which never ends well (see: all of history).
You appear to have a spotty surface understanding of this problem, yet get confused about anything else. You really should fix your education, as it's embarrassing.
Have you learned the difference between land ice and sea ice yet? I love how you laugh out loud at others, yet make amateur mistakes again and again and again.
And all the evidence points to you being wrong. What happens in your part of the world does not imply what's happening in the rest of the world. This is basic stuff.
So you don't understand why the corrections are made. Gotcha. I respect how much energy you have, but I find your disdain and wilful ignorance disgusting. What a waste of a brain.
Yes, both sides have scientists, but only one side has peer-reviewed papers. Ouch.
Can you link to the actual rebuttal? To their paper which shows this peer-reviewed research to be faulty? No? Weird. I guess if all you have are some flapping heads on your side, you might want to reconsider your position.
Nonsense. Your ignorance does not magically make all the evidence disappear. I'm sure you'd love that, but still...
If they have evidence, they won't be shouted down. That's the whole thing. One can't substitute evidence with anger or zeal - if they don't have the evidence, they get shouted down. That's how science has worked this far, and it's telling that when it happens in this field it's a problem, but when it happens in every other field it's perfectly normal, and even expected.
Al Gore is a politician. He has nothing to do with whether AGW is real or not. Mentioning him isn't going to make you look particularly rational :)
He doesn't know the difference between sea ice and land ice, even when it was explained to him, so I'd imagine you are right.
Well, the sorry state of banking and card security in the US has more to do with that than the technology itself.
It costs money to send money from one bank account to another? Jesus Christ. I don't even...
So you're an easily-distracted driver, and that makes it Google's fault? :)
I do know this as a fact, as it's in the fucking video! You'd know it too, if you paid attention. And as for the other 13 accidents, well, who knows - we're discussing this crash here, as we have the data for it.
Yes, your perfect human being, prepared and ready for an accident, might be able to think outside the box, but then so can a bunch of engineers with millions of miles of road data, and their solutions will be far better implemented in their cars than by some distracted, poorly-trained, Dunningâ"Kruger driver. So yeah - people can probably think of better ways to avoid or lessen these impacts, but then those ways can be implemented in software, so we are back to square one: The cars are better drivers than people.