Slashdot Mirror


Cashless Adoption Growing In Europe

dkatana writes: Many European cities are moving toward a cashless economy. Some public services are not accepting cash anymore, such as parking meters, buses and transit, and city offices. (If you plan to visit Europe make sure your credit card has a chip, or you won't be able to use self-service machines.) Contactless cards, which allow people to pay easily for small transactions, are also gaining popularity. According to Finextra, a leading financial news service, "contactless is the new normal in Europe, with more than a billion tap-and-go purchases worth €12.6 billion on Visa cards in the last 12 months." In some places, cashless options are being pushed by mistrust of the banking system. At the same time, places like Germany are dead set on keeping cash as the preferred method of payment.

294 comments

  1. You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just saying.... :D

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by weszz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is how I read it as well... I am adopting a daughter next week friday from foster care for something like $53 total, so was thinking of paying cash... (the $53 is court costs, birth certificate etc...)

      Was wondering if they went to a bartering scheme... I will give you 2 dogs for that child.

    2. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by Adriax · · Score: 3, Funny

      2 dogs for an orphan? Hell of a deal there, as the last time I was in a pet store the cheapest dogs were in the triple digit dollar range.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    3. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by GNious · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should give the dogs away for free, and then bilk you on the service&maintenance contract.

    4. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says they have to be from the pet store?

      Mug the dog catcher after a round, knock off an animal shelter?

      A dozen orphans to do my bidding please.

    5. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how I read it too. Why are AMERICANS so fucking stupid that they can't even write their own language properly?

    6. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should give the dogs away for free, and then bilk you on the service&maintenance contract.

      They do. Have you seen pet food/vet bills?

    7. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by davester666 · · Score: 1

      just walk around, choose one you like, and stuff them into your boot.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    8. Re:You shouldn't have to pay to adopt a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how I read it as well... I am adopting a daughter next week friday from foster care for something like $53 total, so was thinking of paying cash... (the $53 is court costs, birth certificate etc...)

      Was wondering if they went to a bartering scheme... I will give you 2 dogs for that child.

      Having been through a European adoption, however, there is quite a bit of cash involved.

  2. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cash isn't going anywhere. As soon as the lights go out or the servers are down... you can only can with cash.

    1. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would the lights go out or the servers go down? I would think as technology advances, these types of incidents would become fewer and farther between - eventually not happening at all.

    2. Re:Don't worry by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      As soon as the lights go out or the servers are down, cash will be pretty much as useless as credit cards.

    3. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Under normal circumstances its fairly rare, but it does happen. Late last year I was picking up some groceries at Meijer (Think Wal-mart, just a regional version) and due to some communications snafu all electronic payments were down. Cash and check were the only things that they could accept. I regularly hear of such things with smaller drug/convenience stores & on occasion with larger retailers and all of this is under completely normal circumstances. Switch things to more of an emergency situation, such as tornadoes, thunderstorms or hurricanes and these circumstances become the norm rather than the exception. Electronic payments do of course have a place, but as an addition to cash/check not a replacement.

    4. Re:Don't worry by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

      Why would the lights go out or the servers go down?

      Because admins insist on doing upgrades over the weekends. Upgrades they aren't competent to do, or that they haven't properly planned for, or that they haven't allowed enough time for, or that don't work the way they should.

      It's not common, but it does happen that ATMs are down, occasionally.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    5. Re:Don't worry by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

      Why would the lights go out or the servers go down? I would think as technology advances, these types of incidents would become fewer and farther between - eventually not happening at all.

      But it would cause more chaos because people are used to the technology so much that they don't know what to do when the situation occurs...

    6. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electronic payments will eventually replace cash/check. When something is that convenient, it is human nature to adopt it exclusively and not spend any effort at all maintaining a failsafe (of course, some people will but they are a minority). As an example, look at cellular phones. For so many people it is their only method of communication these days. If someone were to take down a few cell towers, you would have a huge swath of the population incommunicado with no real other way to get a hold of anyone.

    7. Re:Don't worry by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Card payments can be accepted without power — that's what the raised numbers printed on the card are for!

      They can also be done offline (no internet/phone) — I've used my Chip+PIN card on planes, on trains in tunnels, at farmer's markets etc.

    8. Re:Don't worry by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      You can only what with cash? Don't leave us hanging, man!

    9. Re:Don't worry by peragrin · · Score: 1

      That's my thought. Without power the point of sale system can't work. No power no sales.

      No power no gas pumps,no stores. Now servers crashing could limit transactions but the people who run those generally believe 5 9s of uptime isn't good enough.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    10. Re:Don't worry by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cash isn't going anywhere.

      Nonsense, I hear Greece has already adopted the cashless system in full.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    11. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The retailer is on the hook for physical verification of the card in the way you are suggesting ("hey, they are accepting physical cards without checking the limit. SPREEEE!!!!!")

    12. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The retailer is on the hook for physical verification of the card in the way you are suggesting ("hey, they are accepting physical cards without checking the limit. SPREEEE!!!!!")

      What does the vendor care? If the customer used this as an opportunity to charge way more than they could they're still on the hook to pay the balance later on.

    13. Re:Don't worry by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The retailer is on the hook for physical verification of the card in the way you are suggesting ("hey, they are accepting physical cards without checking the limit. SPREEEE!!!!!")

      Sure, but they still need a valid PIN, and the retailer can balance the risk against a lost sale.

      EasyJet selling a pack of crisps in the air for £8.50 obviously take that risk, a supermarket might choose not to sell a TV. This could be complicated to explain to staff though.

    14. Re:Don't worry by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      I've I'm in a restaurant, I can still hand over cash and walk out. What are you going to do with all the customers waiting to leave who don't have cash?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    15. Re:Don't worry by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      In my head I just heard the "SHA-CHUNK!" of a shotgun shell being chambered.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    16. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry..."If I'm in..."

    17. Re: Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Patents comment should be modded funny or silly.

    18. Re:Don't worry by zennyboy · · Score: 2

      Bottle caps

    19. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, you can just switch to paper records and then enter the transactions later.

      It's what hospitals do when the power goes down.

    20. Re:Don't worry by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      A few weeks ago, we had a major storm that knocked out the power for a good part of the city. Most places were closed, and one of the few that were open had a big "Cash-Only" sign on it.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    21. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reading ability sucks. He said, "...you can only can with cash."

    22. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When that happens, there will be somebody offering you a special government card that you can use right away; you will just need to agree to give them more control.

      Frankly, government and corporations already have too much control over everything, so why would you be willing to give them more control?

    23. Re:Don't worry by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Other way around. Electronic payments replace cash and cash is used as a backup for electronic. Most of the western world already works that way. This story is about some places in Europe retiring the cash option entirely for some automated vending machines. But those probably won't work so well with the power out anyway.

    24. Re:Don't worry by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The retailer is on the hook for physical verification of credit cards anyway.

    25. Re:Don't worry by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed after I clicked "Submit".

    26. Re: Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Interesting that people aren't using cash because they don't trust banks! The reality is that cash is actually an enemy to banks and if people don't trust banks then it would be in their interest to use cash.

      Cash puts a damper on how far central banks can control inflation rates due to people hoarding cash.

    27. Re:Don't worry by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Other way around. Electronic payments replace cash and cash is used as a backup for electronic. Most of the western world already works that way. This story is about some places in Europe retiring the cash option entirely for some automated vending machines. But those probably won't work so well with the power out anyway.

      And removing cash from vending machine removes maintenance costs:
      -No emptying bill stackers
      -No filling change tubes.

      The machines don't need to be looked at until a problem is detected or reported.

    28. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was in a restaurant and the power went out they gave evenyone a free desert to take away with them and cancelled all the bills [except for any alcohol]. Given it's a place where a meal can be $100 without trying they lost a lot of money, but it also gained them regular diners.

    29. Re:Don't worry by dhaen · · Score: 1

      Card payments can be accepted without power — that's what the raised numbers printed on the card are for!

      Indeed:

      Just as I'd finished filling up there was a power cut. I presented my card - as I had no cash - and the clerk fished out a dusty old manual machine form under the counter. After being shown how to use it by her supervisor, she checked that my signature matched my card, and it was done. Yes my chip and pin contact-less card is backwards compatible for all occasions. Lucky really as I would not have been able to draw cash from an ATM.

    30. Re:Don't worry by tepples · · Score: 1

      Card payments can be accepted without power — that's what the raised numbers printed on the card are for!

      Some newer cards don't include raised numbers. Photo: Slate Visa card by Chase Bank

    31. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody will take cash with the point of sale terminals not working. Maybe some mom and pop places selling tacos or the small Indian grocery can get by with hand written receipts and cash, but close to 100% of the retails establishments will be closed without power.

    32. Re:Don't worry by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Note: the below is a UK perspective, some of it may also apply elsewhere but details are likely to vary.

      Cards can be used offline and even without electricity but the fraud/overspend risk is higher and this can lead to restrictions on use or even the merchant to refuse to accept them altogether.

      AIUI for chip and pin the card issuer sets a limit (which can be zero if the card issuer thinks you are a poor credit risk) for offline transactions to mitigate fraud/overspend risk and they don't usually tell you what said limit is in advance. For imprint and magstripe transactions I belive it's down to the merchant (and possiblly their bank) what transactions they are willing to risk taking offline.

      If you have already eaten the meal/filled your fuel tank/got on the train then the retailers choice may come down to taking the card offline (and possiblly reverting to magstripe to get around the offline restrictions on chip and pin, I've seen that happen on a train before) or taking an IOU. The card is a lower risk than the IOU.

      On the other hand a normal retailer is in a very different situation. If they decide they don't want to take cards offline and/or in a power cut either because they think the risk is too high, or for power cut scenarios because they don't want to bother stocking card imprinters and training their staff how to use them then you are SOL.

      Also IIRC in the UK automated vending machines are restricted to online chip and pin transactions only. They are not allowed to do swipe and sign transactions or offline transactions.

      So don't rely on your credit/debit card working in an offline/power cut scenario.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    33. Re:Don't worry by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      AIUI many greeks are withdrawing as much cash as the banks/government will let them. They know that their bank balances are at risk of a forced conversion to a new currency (and subsequent devaluation) while it's much harder to make such a forced conversion on banknotes held by individuals.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    34. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per merchant agreements, we cannot ask to see or verify the signature or another form of identification. Nor can we deny use of the card without a signature one on the back. Even if the card states "check photo id" the merchant is not allowed to do this. The signature on the card and the receipt is an acknowledgement between the card holder and the issuer, the merchant is not a party to this agreement. As long as the transaction is approved by the processor, the transaction is considered valid and the merchant carries no liability.

      In the above situation, the merchant would need to call the processor for approval and it cannot be done post acknowledgement. Since the merchant violated their agreement, you could have gotten free gas if you challenged the transaction

      I don't know of any merchant that actually uses imprint machines considering they cannot be used for cards without embossing and these are becoming more common.

    35. Re:Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be like the rest of the world and have a till at the exit with paypass

    36. Re:Don't worry by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Really? Because last time all the lights went out at my bank all of their POS systems around the country put the credit cards through anyway requiring a signature in a fall-back mode.

      But I understand, by comparison with the rest of the world the credit-card system in America is still in the stone age.

    37. Re:Don't worry by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Even more importantly: they get more customer data by forcing people to use cards.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    38. Re:Don't worry by Trongy · · Score: 1

      I see lots of retailers in my area using battery powered card readers that do transactions via the cell phone network. I expect they would work fine in a power outage as long as the cellular network was up.

    39. Re:Don't worry by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Was it a low desert or high desert....scrub brush, cacti or dunes?

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    40. Re:Don't worry by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There have been vending machines that only take contactless cards in Japan for some years now. Some of them also have an "emergency mode", where they dispense free drinks and electricity (for charging phones and batteries etc.) if there is a major disaster. I'm not sure how they know when to go into emergency mode, hopefully (for the owners) it's securely communicated somehow. I think many of them have data connections of some kind, probably mobile network based, for reporting back stats and stock levels so that could be it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re: Don't worry by kenh · · Score: 1

      A while ago there was a glitch with processing EBT cards, the spending limits were not being checked, and EBT shoppers bought as much as they could carry to the register. Once limits were were again being checked, the EBT shoppers abandoned their stuffed carts and went home.

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/eb...

      Problems occur, and making zero provisions for when a problem eventually does occur will multiply the impact of the problem.

      --
      Ken
    42. Re: Don't worry by kenh · · Score: 1

      And removing cash from vending machine removes maintenance costs:
      -No emptying bill stackers
      -No filling change tubes.

      Yes, it is a terrible, terrible agony to take all that cash out of your vending machines when you have to visit the vending machine to restock the candy, newspaper, snacks, sodas the machine has sold...

      Much better to have easily-audited computer records for every 75 cent candy bar sale so you can be certain you pay all your required taxes on the goods sold. Why would a vending machine operator prefer something as hard to audit as cash?

      --
      Ken
    43. Re: Don't worry by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I wasn't thinking candy vending machines, more parking and transit kiosks, where at most you just need to fill them with a roll of paper. From TFS:

      Some public services are not accepting cash anymore, such as parking meters, buses and transit,

      There is costs involved to handling cash transactions, whether at a store or a parking meter. Collecting, counting, and depositing cash, and distributing change. Plus additional controls required to making sure employees don't steal cash. Add in security of employees servicing machines (as they will be carrying a significant amount of cash on them).

      If card transaction can be paid by a debit card, not processed through Visa or Mastercard, it can be cheaper to the merchant than cash.

  3. The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is a tip: if you don't trust banks, keep cash. Ask the Greeks and Cypriots why.

    1. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL I was wondering about the logic behind that.

      "We don't trust banks, so we just decided to let them manage all of our assets"

    2. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by dkatana · · Score: 1

      Here is a tip: if you don't trust banks, keep cash. Ask the Greeks and Cypriots why.

      Well, you can always use Bitcoin

    3. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      Nope. They don't use banks for their cashless efforts.

    4. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Correct; if you followed the link, you'd discover that it's about people who don't trust banks moving from keeping cash under their mattresses to using cashless payment services offered by mobile phone companies, rather than banks. This is very common in Africa.

    5. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I think I trust my employee credit union a heck of a lot more than I trust AT&T or Verizon. How about you?

    6. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Yeah that statement left me scratching my head too. It was added by the editor, not the submitter, so it's probably not surprising that it was poorly phrased. If you follow the link, you find that it's about people not trusting banks, so they're using their mobile phone carrier to handle small monetary transactions.

    7. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can always straw man.

    8. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the stores you go to accept Bitcoin in the first place.

    9. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

      Governments (state and federal) in the US and doubtless other places in the world as well are able to tap into bank (and credit union) accounts for various reasons.

      Two years ago, I moved from California to Oregon after retirement, taking my car and bike with me; I left my banking in San Francisco for convenience (not changing automatic payments, etc.). California withdrew my registration fees directly from my bank when they were overdue (the vehicles were "garaged" in Oregon at that time). I had no recourse.

      Keeping your assets in a US bank is more risky, I judge, than keeping it in your wallet.

    10. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you didn't do BASIC due diligance of canceling your registration and turning in your tags?

    11. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by nate_in_ME · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I had to guess, this isn't a case of "government tapping into my bank account", but rather a case of having previously given them payment information tied to this account, and as a "courtesy", they auto-renewed the registration when it was due. Heck, an "auto-renew" setting may have even been turned on and forgotten about...

    12. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin may not be the perfect solution for everything, but if you want a cashless payment technology with the anonymity of cash (i.e. not perfect, but much better than the alternatives), then Bitcoin is already here, been for a few years and spreading in adoption quite nicely. You can keep waiting for your perfect solution, or you can start using Bitcoin now.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    13. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by mlts · · Score: 2

      I was wondering that too. A cashless economy only makes one more dependent on banks because if the card doesn't work, one is SOL.

      BitCoin is another alternative... but it requires Internet access or else one is at risk of being the victim of double-spending, and to be really sure, one needs the entire blockchain (going on 40+ gigs.)

      Were I worried about banks, I'd be doing what our ancestors did almost a century ago -- getting cash out and stashing the currency in mattresses. However, no currencies today are backed by precious metals, so even with this, it might mean one has a bunch of wads of toilet paper instead of a currency that is usable.

    14. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of the developers at Blockstream have been testing out a new feature called "Confidential Transactions" with the anonymity of Monero but the ability to be pruned from the blockchain (which reduces hard drive requirements).

    15. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      I have a feeling I might trust African phone companies more than AT&T or Verizon also. African phone companies are charging $0 transaction fees, as compared to $0.5 for debit, 2% for Visa & MasterCard, and (2.2% to 2.9%) + $0.3 for Paypal.

    16. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, this appears to have nothing to do with trusting one organization over another and everything to do with reduced transaction costs.

    17. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by dkatana · · Score: 1

      A Catalan company is installing Bitcoin ATMs in Greece to help people make international transactions and go around the currency controls. Similar solutions exist in Argentina. In countries such as Venezuela their currency is effectively worthless...

    18. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by codebonobo · · Score: 2

      I was wondering that too. A cashless economy only makes one more dependent on banks because if the card doesn't work, one is SOL.

      BitCoin is another alternative... but it requires Internet access or else one is at risk of being the victim of double-spending, and to be really sure, one needs the entire blockchain (going on 40+ gigs.)

      You don't need the internet or even power to trade bitcoin. (Physical coins or paperwallets). The security concerns of physical bitcoins are the same with physical fiat. You do not need to download the full blockchain now either as you can use an SPV wallet, online wallet(I.E. circle/coinbase) , or have a pruned full node at about 1GB of space.

    19. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the USA, we have FDIC.

      In a poor country, banks might not be ensured, or you might not trust the government to be willing (or able) to reimburse all account holders in the event of a collapse.

    20. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by ADRA · · Score: 1

      The banks were fine-ish. Its the nation that spent themselves into the grave. The banks are just doing what they can to prevent complete economic collapse.

      --
      Bye!
    21. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By stealing the money of their depositors. I think to properly phrase this, you should state that "the banks are just doing what they can to prevent economic collapse for their shareholders and creditors."

    22. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do agree with the parent -- to trade BitCoin, it can be purely physical (as in from bitcoinpaperwallet.com). However, if Alice gave a piece of paper with a wallet's private key to Bob and the identical one to Charlie, the first one who gets the transaction in the system and through the blockchain gets the BTC, the second is screwed.

      As for the blockchain, there are supposedly shortcuts (mainly letting people run it for you...) but same problem with those as with exchanges. Said group can easily change results in order to snag your stuff or delay it enough for a double-spending attack to take place.

    23. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by jittles · · Score: 1

      If I had to guess, this isn't a case of "government tapping into my bank account", but rather a case of having previously given them payment information tied to this account, and as a "courtesy", they auto-renewed the registration when it was due. Heck, an "auto-renew" setting may have even been turned on and forgotten about...

      I would not be surprised if you were guessing incorrectly. The California DMV website makes no mention of auto renewal. Part of your registration fee is a "Vehicle License Fee", which is a tax on the vehicle's value. Since it is a tax (and deductible from your federal taxes), the California State Franchise Tax Board probably uses its authority to automatically take it's money from your bank account directly. I could be wrong, however.

      Anyway, when I left the state of California I found that California gave me one of two options: A) Pay income tax for the year you give up your residency at the non-resident rate, even if you did not work a single day in the state of California. B) pay state income tax on my out of state income even for tax years where I was no longer living in the state until I forsake my residency. They'll do whatever they can to get as much money as possible from you.

    24. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

      Part of your registration fee is a "Vehicle License Fee" [ca.gov], which is a tax on the vehicle's value. Since it is a tax (and deductible from your federal taxes), the California State Franchise Tax Board probably uses its authority to automatically take it's money from your bank account directly.

      You are exactly correct. My point is not the wretched excess power granted by these laws, but the insecurity of banking when governments are deeply in debt. Read the GP with this in mind; I was supporting his point that governments have the power to remove assets from bank accounts without permission or notice.

    25. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a tip: if you don't trust banks, keep cash. Ask the Greeks and Cypriots why.

      Love it... cashless is "being pushed by mistrust of the banking system" -- really?!?! Who TF do you think is processing your card transaction you morons?? Going cashless is putting *more* trust in the banks, not less.

    26. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way the FTB can only get money from your financial institution without your approval is through a court issued garnishment order.

    27. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well nothing yet has happened to the Greek's that wouldn't have happened if they had their cash at home other than what at this point looks like a short term restriction of supply.

      As for the Cypriots if you had kept your hard earned cash under a pillow for 5 years you'd have been in no better place. Savings accounts and loan offset accounts do wonders to counter the affects of inflation which money in the mattress does not.

    28. Re: The. ignorance is strong in this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to read some Wikipedia articles, bud, because you have so many facts wrong, my God.

    29. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Don't the Telecommunication companies all use banks though? At the bottom of the layer cake, wouldn't it still be using a bank?

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    30. Re:The. ignorance is strong in this one. by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      I do agree with the parent -- to trade BitCoin, it can be purely physical (as in from bitcoinpaperwallet.com). However, if Alice gave a piece of paper with a wallet's private key to Bob and the identical one to Charlie, the first one who gets the transaction in the system and through the blockchain gets the BTC, the second is screwed.

      True, you should trade physical bitcoins with people you trust.

      As for the blockchain, there are supposedly shortcuts (mainly letting people run it for you...) but same problem with those as with exchanges. Said group can easily change results in order to snag your stuff or delay it enough for a double-spending attack to take place.

      This applies to most online wallets(not all) , somewhat with SPV nodes but not really , but nothing to do with pruned nodes that are around 1GB in size.

  4. The middlemen are winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sweet deal: 15% of all cashless transactions everywhere for doing nothing more than pushing electrons.

    1. Re:The middlemen are winning by Needs2BeSaid · · Score: 1

      Actually, the transaction costs are not that high. Those "extra" costs are offset by businesses not needing people to handle cash and, especially, checks. Less employee theft of cash. No bounced checks that have to be handled by third-party recovery companies. Businesses, particularly small ones, come out ahead when they go cashless.

      --
      Some things need to be said...
    2. Re:The middlemen are winning by dkatana · · Score: 1

      ... Those "extra" costs are offset by businesses not needing people to handle cash and, especially, checks. Less employee theft of cash. No bounced checks that have to be handled by third-party recovery companies. Businesses, particularly small ones, come out ahead when they go cashless.

      I agree. And public administration, especially transit authorities, is going that way to stop paying big bucks for cash handling services. The cost of moving money around is enormous.

    3. Re:The middlemen are winning by Rei · · Score: 2

      My mother sometimes sends me checks from the states. The bank cashiers are always confused by them and have to get their managers, who eventually sign off on them. The last time I was at the bank with a check the cashier spent several minutes insisting to me that they can't accept checks before going back and getting approval.

      Checks have no place in this modern world.

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
    4. Re:The middlemen are winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Checks have no place in this modern world."

      But then how would old ladies hold up checkout lines at grocery stores?

    5. Re:The middlemen are winning by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      In many places outside the US and europe store owners give a discount if you use cash rather than a credit card. There are significant costs to accepting credit cards. In my country merchants get hit with 6-8% + chargeback costs, thus have a 8 to 16% overhead for accepting credit cards vs cash or bitcoin.

    6. Re:The middlemen are winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the days when I was still selling moderate amounts of shareware I got a check from the USA via snail mail from Kagi from time to time. It always said "Walnut Creek" or something like that and looked really strange. Man, was that a great feeling holding that check in my hand.

      Anyway, a Berlin bank called "Sparkasse" charged fees on these checks that varied from time to time. One time the fee was more than half of what the check worth, around 60 percent and the woman behind the counter didn't even warn me! It took some time until the money went on the account. I went back to the bank and she explained to me that essentially every bank that was in between as a middleman for the final cashing in of the check could essentially keep a fairly arbitrary "administrative fee". She also told me she had no clue who those middlemen banks were and it was really hard to find out.

      I went to the Citibank and the fees were tolerable again. Nowadays everything is done via via transfer, but I don't sell any shareware anymore anyway. :(

    7. Re: The middlemen are winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is the cost of all the payment middlemen who want their percentage cut of every transaction. Cash doesn't have that issue.

    8. Re:The middlemen are winning by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's pretty dire. Most "expensive" processors here in the states are ~3%. Paypal Here, Square, and a couple others are basically wooing very small businesses with the ability to process credit, but it costs more than the typical 2.5-2.7% charged to large account holders who process directly with major banks.

      Cash is still king though, as it's not the credit card fees that matter but rather the government who tacks on the 15-25% fee for use of their military, roads, banking system, and various and sundry other services. Cash can be recorded or not, as you see fit.

      Bitcoin does me no good as I have to both pay to have it converted to hard currency and take the risk that it will devalue significantly in the time it takes to make the conversion. Today alone, interday fluctuation of the value of bitcoin was 3%, and 14% in the last week. There's no value in that kind of uncertainty in my income.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    9. Re:The middlemen are winning by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin does me no good as I have to both pay to have it converted to hard currency and take the risk that it will devalue significantly in the time it takes to make the conversion. Today alone, interday fluctuation of the value of bitcoin was 3%, and 14% in the last week. There's no value in that kind of uncertainty in my income.

      You are correct that bitcoin is far more volatile than the USD and does indeed have several shortcommings. A few points of clarification though:

      You don't need to pay anything to convert BTC to Fiat , as merchant processors like coinbase and bitpay don't charge anything for this

      You don't need to pick between Fiat and Bitcoin. You can use both and save a lot of money. When bitcoin is down 5-10% I spend my fiat, when it is up I spend Bitcoin and everything just became cheaper. In fact I can already save 20-30% on amazon with bitcoin , so spending it when it appreciates makes everything 25-40% cheaper!

      Americans are spoiled because the US dollar is a relatively stable reserve currency. There are many countries that have currencies with insanely high inflation (vs US low 5-8%)and more volatility than Bitcoin. In fact, on a week a week basis bitcoin was more stable than the euro for 3 months this year.

  5. and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally almost never carry cash any more, the only time I really use cash is when out drinking or going to a really tiny corner shop/off licence where they still charge extra to pay by card. I use an oyster card for my public transport (or my debit card if I'm out of credit), and pay for most my small purchases using contact less, I can pay for parking by phone, and I still have a debit and credit card for anything bigger.

    Why would I pay for any high value goods in cash, when I can put it on my credit card, get chargeback protection and still not pay any interest on it?

    1. Re:and? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I bought a used car with cash. The owner gave me a reduced price vs check. I got a good deal, he got the cash he wanted.

      I carry cash around for tips, so I make sure the waiter/waitress gets theirs.

      I buy food with cash at the local farmers market because its faster than paying with a card. They prefer it as well, there is a cost adder for them to take credit.

    2. Re: and? by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 1

      They offer you no interest because you have the alternative of paying with cash, which affects their negotiating position. If cash transactions are made illegal, fees on electronic transactions will go up, because as a customer you have no choice but to accept the fee. There's a huge difference between cash being less preferred, and cash being illegal or otherwise encumbered.

    3. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and still not pay any interest on it?

      Well, someone didn't take Economics 101. TANSTAAFL always, bro. And I say this as a Keynesian social democrat who would readily be hung as a communist in this weird Thatcherite parody of a society.

      You are paying the interest, but it's part of the price of the product. The bank isn't giving you an interest-free loan - it's collecting the interest by discounting the amount given to the merchant. The merchant has set their prices accordingly.

      For large purchases, a pile of 50 quid notes is going to be a lot nicer for the seller (except in an area at risk of robberies) than the large cut that Visa/Mastercard/Amex and the card processor together take.

    4. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you ever get pulled over in the US, the cops can do all that with your cash too.

    5. Re:and? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally almost never carry cash any more, the only time I really use cash is when out drinking or going to a really tiny corner shop/off licence where they still charge extra to pay by card. I use an oyster card for my public transport (or my debit card if I'm out of credit), and pay for most my small purchases using contact less, I can pay for parking by phone, and I still have a debit and credit card for anything bigger.

      Why would I pay for any high value goods in cash, when I can put it on my credit card, get chargeback protection and still not pay any interest on it?

      You are proud of being dependent on the system? If there is a a power outage or if the debit system goes down, good luck getting anything without cash.

      I recall being at a movie theatre lining up to purchase tickets for a popular title when the debit system went down in the area. Fortunately, I had cash so I was able to get into the theatre and see the film while all of the "winners" with only debit and credit cards got to go home.

      Do not bother calling yourself an adult if you do not carry around enough cash in case of an emergency or just simply to pay for really small purchases.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    6. Re:and? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Right, because that happens all the time. And, yes, I know it has happened...but only about as frequently as an AC posting something insightful.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC post something insightful almost every story. The fact that a non zero number of police taking cash off people at random traffic stops is a daily occurance makes it one to many.

    8. Re: and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that banks can just do it. Recently it turned out that I could no longer put money on my savings account. I went to the bank and they told me that they now have a cap on it and I'd have to open a new account under much worse conditions, even though the original contract said nothing about a cap and was still running. I complained but they said "Sorry, sorry blablabla" and basically offered me no choice.

      I could have sued them and would very likely have won. But where I live it would have taken years and I don't have a lawyer, neither can I afford one. What kind of reputable and halfway honorable person has a lawyer anyway?

    9. Re: and? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      1 - open a new account under worse conditions
      2 - somewhere else, as in: with another bank.
      I'd be tempted to close that account immediately but if the conditions are so much better . . . do it in a couple of years.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  6. US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both of my US credit cards now have chips in them. I think most banks are shipping out chips with their cards now. For contactless, we have Apple Pay / Google Wallet

    1. Re:US by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      These EMV cards, as they are called, are a new standard in the US, and are now usable in the rest of the world. The problem is that the authentication is still by signature, no PIN, making them useless as a security device. The one advantage is that your credit card will no longer be giggled at in Europe.

    2. Re:US by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Chip & PIN will be here soon enough. When users finally give up on signing with a swoosh, and pin like they do for debit.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The issuer chooses how they authenticate

      The card and payment machine interact on the most acceptable common choice, or, give up.

      "Hi, I'm a Credit Card issued by Foo Corp Bank. I prefer Chip & Signature, but I can also offer just Chip only"
      "Hello Foo Corp Credit Card. I'm afraid I'm a vending machine, I offer Chip & PIN, or Chip only for small transactions"
      "OK. Chip only it is"
      "OK, I talked to Foo Corp Bank and they said XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, I want to charge your owner $3.45"
      "Thanks, OK then, YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY"
      "Great, nice doing business with you.

      If you have a US "Chip & Signature" card, and plan to use unattended payment in Europe, make sure your bank understands what you expect to do, and has issued a card that agrees to Chip only transactions when told a signature is impossible. Or better, get one that has Chip & PIN. Because if your card stubbornly requires a signature, and it's talking to a vending machine in a cheap hotel it will get told to fuck off.

    4. Re:US by Rei · · Score: 2

      Good to see you guys catching up on credit cards. When are you going to finally modernize your banking system as well? ;)

      Anyway, I can attest to the point of this article, in Iceland you see those little portable card readers (I don't know what they're called in English, they look like this) everywhere, whether it's someone walking around between tents at a campsite collecting the day's fees or some unknown band playing a little gig in a bar - a lot more often than you see them in the states.

      --
      "You see, Government is a system that is based on weapons." -- Timster
    5. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is a good thing because? Chip-n-Pin was portrayed as a foolproof security scheme in Europe but after it was rolled out it was proven to be anything but. A lot of people consider it nothing but a thinly veiled attempt by the credit card companies to shoulder fraudulent charges on consumers/businesses. For the longest time credit card companies in Europe wouldn't even acknowledge that fraudulent charges were possible, it took several proven cases, court threats and getting dragged through the mud by the press for them to finally accept it.

    6. Re:US by dkatana · · Score: 1

      My wife just got her Capital One "Chip+Signature" card. Last month my Santander (MA) debit card was replaced for another magstripe only debit card, Exp. 2019 Some banks are not catching up..

    7. Re:US by xaxa · · Score: 1

      If you have a US "Chip & Signature" card, and plan to use unattended payment in Europe, make sure your bank understands what you expect to do, and has issued a card that agrees to Chip only transactions when told a signature is impossible. Or better, get one that has Chip & PIN. Because if your card stubbornly requires a signature, and it's talking to a vending machine in a cheap hotel it will get told to fuck off.

      Much more importantly than a vending machine in a cheap hotel, a machine selling metro or train tickets.

      My experience in the UK (where I live) is such machines require a PIN even for small amounts (£2), but in Germany it's only required for large amounts.

      At a large station and/or in commuting hours there might be a ticket office open, but you can't rely on that.

    8. Re:US by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Those aren't that common in the US. Instead it's more common to use a smartphone or tablet with a small card reader dongle that plugs into the audio jack.

      My only complaint with this more over to chips in the cards, is that the new cards with the chip, no longer support contact pay. I was using contact pay for years, but that option has now been removed. This has gotten me to start using Google Wallet/Pay.

    9. Re:US by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Good to see you guys catching up on credit cards. When are you going to finally modernize your banking system as well? ;)

      Oddly enough, over that last decade I have spent a lot of time in Germany and there were still many small shops that don't accept cards due to the fees, while cards had already become almost ubiquitous in the US.

    10. Re:US by ciaran2014 · · Score: 1

      > For contactless, we have Apple Pay / Google Wallet

      Who's "we" pale face?

      I won't be giving those companies control of my money, thanks.

      --
      Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
    11. Re:US by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      My wife just got her Capital One "Chip+Signature" card. Last month my Santander (MA) debit card was replaced for another magstripe only debit card, Exp. 2019 Some banks are not catching up..

      Chip and signature? Is that an American thing? Here in Canada, we went from Swipe and signature to Chip and PIN years ago. The only time our system required a signature with the chip was for the first use.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    12. Re: US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Also with all the liability for fraud pushed on the users and merchants, which is what the chip cards are really about. They are not hack proof, yet the banks will blame you for being a victim as though the card were bulletproof, just like they do in Europe.

    13. Re:US by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      If I'm in a queue to pay in a supermarket, the ones that take the time are the ones who use their cards.
      I also spend a lot of time in Germany and pretty much the only times I use a card is when it is to be charged to the company or when the amount exceeds a couple of hundred Euros.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    14. Re:US by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      Yup...last september, in advance of foreign travel, I got a travel-oriented credit card. This thing advertises 0% foreign currency fees, travel miles, has a international collect phone # on it for any issues, etc.

      The damn thing showed up with only a mag stripe and a 2017 expiration date. This is well after all Target stores switched to chip-compatible readers (after their data breach) and it is well known that the standard abroad is chip and pin.

      Even so...my friend on the trip had a Chip+Signature card which was equally annoying. Sure, they can read the chip instead of the magstripe, but they still have to go and find you a pen (waiters often didn't carry them with the CC reader since nobody has to sign things anymore). And it doesn't work on vending machines for things like parking or train tickets since it doesn't have a PIN.

      --
      Bottles.
    15. Re:US by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      All cards support chip only transactions. The problem is that not all self service unattended machines will support it, some are set up to require a PIN in all cases. But not all American cards support PIN.

      Visa has a mandate that self service unattended kiosks support chip only, but I have little faith that they'll be able to enforce that mandate, or at minimum, that changes will be made promptly (the mandate was supposed to have gone into effect this month).

      --
      End of Line.
    16. Re:US by Nemosoft+Unv. · · Score: 1

      They may not accept credit cards due to the fees, but debit cards are accepted more and more widely, even in Germany. The difference is that a credit card provider will take a percentage of the sale (so cutting directly into your margin), while a debit card transaction may cost a small, fixed fee. It is not uncommon to see a minimum amount for plastic payments.

      The Netherlands has a long history of PIN payments and they even encourage you now to pay electronically for small purchases (like a bread at the baker, a drink, a magazine) so apparently they have been able to drive down the price of plastic payments very low. For shopkeepers, the less coins and notes there are in the drawer, the better.

      I suppose in the US shopkeepers collectively increase their prices to compensate for the credit card 'cut'.

      --
      "Fix it? It has been disintegrated, by definition it cannot be fixed!" - Gru in Despicable Me.
    17. Re:US by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I suppose in the US shopkeepers collectively increase their prices to compensate for the credit card 'cut'.

      Correct, prices reflect the average cost based on how much cash and credit transactions they typically have, although some gas stations still do have a higher price for credit card vs cash. Europe seems to be catching up in that regard, accepting that cost at more and more places and using the cards. That's nice for me because its less Euro cash I need to mess with when there.

    18. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Capital One credit card works as CHIP+Signature and CHIP+PIN. Most retailers in Europe require the signature, but works on vending machines with the PIN.

    19. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wireless machines was invented in Norway for pubs/bars that had bad liquidity.
      They had to pay all deliveries by card...

  7. Privacy Issues by Needs2BeSaid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Governments everywhere will help facilitate a cashless society. Just think of all that purchasing data they can monitor. Not to mention, they can force people to pay local/state/federal sales tax on person-to-person sales (e.g.: Garage Sale items).

    A truly cashless society is the wet dream of the IRS, FBI, NSA ....

    --
    Some things need to be said...
    1. Re: Privacy Issues by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 2

      It's not just that. In a cashless society the government van put a tax on deposits that can't be avoided by holding currency. In other words, it makes it possible to seize savings in a way that is fairly automated.

    2. Re:Privacy Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the banks who're pushing it more than anyone else. He who controls the float, controls the universe.

      VAT reporting kicks in at about the $100,000 stage so no worries there.

    3. Re:Privacy Issues by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually a truly cashless society is the wet dream of every government and central banker since inflation is the most insidious and powerful tax that can be implemented without participation of any IRS and of any citizen whatsoever.

      You don't even have to make a tax payment to be taxed with inflation and government doesn't have to bother pretending to have some kind of fiscal policy. The only policy of a 'cashless society' is printing money and the result of that policy is destruction of that society via destruction of its economy.

    4. Re:Privacy Issues by lhowaf · · Score: 1

      In the US, the money (cash) says, "This note is legal tender for all debts public and private." Cashless? Shut up and take my cash.

    5. Re: Privacy Issues by Agripa · · Score: 1

      With a fiat currency they can do this anyway whether the money is kept in a bank or in cash on hand.

    6. Re: Privacy Issues by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      In a cashless society the government van put a tax on deposits that can't be avoided by holding currency. In other words, it makes it possible to seize savings in a way that is fairly automated.

      Government doesn't have to do that. They can already print money, which allows them to inflate your savings into nonexistence.

      Note that inflating the currency also allows them to do unto the currency you're holding. A more comprehensive solution all around.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    7. Re: Privacy Issues by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      With a fiat currency they can do this anyway whether the money is kept in a bank or in cash on hand.

      No, they can't. The government can't just say "Joe Smith's dollar bills aren't worth a dollar" as a way of taxing or confiscating his hard money, but they can have the bank hand over the electronic money it is holding on his behalf, or tax him on the balance.

      The only thing that a "fiat" can do is devalue everyone's money, which isn't what the OP was talking about.

    8. Re:Privacy Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about barter?

    9. Re:Privacy Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think for example Sweden push this harder than any other nation? Well with a taxaxation levels ranging from about 50 to 65% there is a lot of under the table jobs. If you push cash less then you can eaisly monitor peoples income and send a tax bill for unregisted incomes sort of saying.

    10. Re:Privacy Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just posted the dumbest comment in the history of slashdot. Do you understand that what you're complaining about has been the case and nothing to complain about since the beginning of the known banking systems? Do you seriously think that for each unit of a currency in existence the central bank in the country produces some physical representation? You just showed that no matter how stupid I assume you libertardians/ancapables are, you manage to be even dumber.

    11. Re: Privacy Issues by Agripa · · Score: 1

      They do it in aggregate. Everybody's cash whether stored at home or electronically is taxed by devaluing it. From the perspective of the person with the cash no matter how it is stored, devaluing it or taxing it has the same effect; the value decreases.

    12. Re:Privacy Issues by CrowderSoup · · Score: 1

      True for the moment, but I imagine it won't be that way forever.

      --
      Code, eat, sleep, repeat.
    13. Re: Privacy Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but this is Europe we're talking about. A government can't devalue everyone's money, because the Euro is transnational. That's why the Greeks can't print themselves out of debt this time, like they've done in the past.

      It's funny, but the ECB has made the Euro more stable than gold-back currencies. That's definitely hurting the fiat-bashers.

  8. Foreshadowing by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is a foreshadowing of the UK becoming the first to implement mandatory ID chip implants?

    --
    Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    1. Re:Foreshadowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      Obviously.

    2. Re:Foreshadowing by disposable60 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's unnecessary what with advances in facial-recognition software and ubiquitous video surveillance.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
  9. Bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A cashless society is a surveillance society where every purchase you make is recorded permanently -- not only for government to use against you as they see fit, but for corporations to exploit your lack of privacy for their own profit (not yours).

    1. Re:Bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chaumian blinded signatures, Monero, Confidential Transactions, JoinMarket...

  10. Cashless pushed by mistrust of banking system? by ERJ · · Score: 1

    Seems more like mistrust of local currency because of inflation is pushing people to use US dollars. Alternately, the push for credit cards that transact in US dollars. So, pretty much they are placing all their trust in the banking system as far as I can tell.

    1. Re:Cashless pushed by mistrust of banking system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, nobody who's using cashless is accepting US dollars. You could draw on an account in USD, if you felt like spending a fortune on foreign transaction fees.

    2. Re:Cashless pushed by mistrust of banking system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mistrust of the Euro? Have you lost your mind?

      You maybe have been reading too many stories about Greece, forgot that it is a small state in Europe, and that even there, they trust the currency -- just no one has any.

    3. Re:Cashless pushed by mistrust of banking system? by ERJ · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the linked article regarding cashless adoption being pushed. Specifically it cited Zimbabwe, Kenya and Somaliland where rampant inflation caused a loss in confidence of the currency.

  11. Europe has also had wire transfers by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wire transfers are extremely common in Europe; virtually instantaneous, cheap, etc. Customers can do them themselves, person to person.

    Here in the US? Anywhere from a day to WEEKS for absolutely no legitimate reason. You generally need a teller or branch manager to do it. At least $5; $40 if the transaction ends up going through the Fed.

    It's 2015. Why does transferring money in the US take more than a minute and a few cents?

    1. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why does transferring money in the US take more than a minute

      Because banks have to manage millions of transfers and sort them in the correct order to ensure the maximum number of bounced checks.

    2. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Electrawn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chase Quickpay?

    3. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      Wire transfers are extremely common in Europe; virtually instantaneous, cheap, etc. Customers can do them themselves, person to person.

      Here in the US? Anywhere from a day to WEEKS for absolutely no legitimate reason. You generally need a teller or branch manager to do it. At least $5;

      If the transfer is from FedWire bank to FedWire bank, it's posted within minutes. This is usually how most Americans close out mortgages (so that the interest owed and paid is *exactly* correct.

      $40 if the transaction ends up going through the Fed.

      It's 2015. Why does transferring money in the US take more than a minute and a few cents?

      Because it's going through the Federal Reserve. And the $40 charge is the maximum change, which assumes sending from a non-FedWire bank to another non-FedWire bank (within the US). Most banks charge $25 (which is almost always more than what the bank pays the Fed).
      Remember, these prices have been stable for *years*. So with inflation the cost has been decreasing.

      --
      227-3517
    4. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that sounds like a long time to wait. I just use Google Wallet since it has no fees. I tell it to take money from my checking account - that takes about 60 seconds. Then I send it to my daughter (college) - no fee and it takes less than a minute. She can then either spend it with Tap-n-pay, the Google Wallet card, or deposit it to her bank direct from Google Wallet. End to end it is very fast, easy, and free. (Note: some banks do add delays to this. My credit union and her bank do not - they go through right away.).

    5. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by dave420 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It costs money to send money from one bank account to another? Jesus Christ. I don't even...

    6. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I just use Google Wallet since it has no fees. I

      Yeah, Google Wallet seems to work really well.

      I tell it to take money from my checking account

      Woah, I don't know if I would go that far. You want as few people to have access to your bank account as possible. Use a credit card for better protection.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Actually you want to have a secondary checking account that is linked to many systems. Your primary checking account and the savings account (high interest online account) should be the ones that are not linked to anything but your secondary "spending" checking account.

    8. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      >It's 2015. Why does transferring money in the US take more than a minute and a few cents? I transfer money via ACH all the time for $1 per transaction.

      Manual wires are different, and have a lot of costs associated with them. There are people involved, not just data being pushed.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    9. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Honestly, for folks that are ok at managing budgets, there just isn't a need for "quick cash" here in the US. Almost everyone accepts cards*. Many people I know hardly go through a $20 bill in 3 months! You can transfer cash to almost any bank in 24 hours and withdraw it 24 hours later for free. Thou you do need to setup and link the accounts up front (again managing budgets). Most bank networks have it instantaneous within their network. We have 3 weeks to pay almost all bills and that's more than enough time to setup and execute autopays.

      Quite frankly, there just isn't enough demand in the US to justify the switch from batch overnight transactions to costly just-in-time transactions (or some appearance of). I just used my credit card for 88 cents at Walmart.com.

      * = Government services & housing usually don't, but they accept personal checks.

    10. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      It's 2015. Why does transferring money in the US take more than a minute and a few cents?

      Because in America, you can open a bank like you can open any other business, so there's thousands of them.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    11. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Some banks do have some better facilities for this. Someone replied above me about Chase Quickpay (I'm not familiar with it), and I use the P2P transfer at Capital One 360 all the time. It does still use ACH so it's a two-business day wait for the money to become available at the other end, but it's very easy to use from the bank's website.

    12. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And in Europe such hindrances do not exist because.....magic?

    13. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not like it's free in Europe. EBA settlement costs are 0.011 Euro, although banks do get a bulk discount above 25.000 payments a day.

      But yes, I can see why my bank doesn't bother charging me extra for that.

    14. Re:Europe has also had wire transfers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wire transfers are extremely common in Europe; virtually instantaneous, cheap, etc. Customers can do them themselves, person to person.

      No, it takes more like two open work days.

      My bank doesn't even allow me to add a recipient without an explicit waiting period of one work day.

  12. Don't forget to take some cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cards with chips are norm in Europe for decades, but don't forget to take some cash with you. I managed to live in Sweden for a few months without holding a single coin/paper in my hands but at the end failed in a tourist place where ice cream was sold for cash only and the notice "no cards" was only in Swedish* + no ATM on that island :(

    * I can communicate without problems in four languages but EU has 24.

  13. A big place, a wide range by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Funny
    Never make the mistake of thinking of "Europe" as a single entity. It isn't.

    While it's true that in London the buses no longer take cash (you'll need an Oyster card) that's not the case everywhere - not even everywhere in England. But in many parts of most European countries (yes, Europe isn't even a single country) cash is very much king and it's wrong to assume that a credit card will be universally accepted. Many restaurants outside of cities in lots of countries won't take plastic. So it's wise to have enough cash to cover a transaction, even if you do expect to pay with a card.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:A big place, a wide range by Sique · · Score: 1

      And even Europe is not exactly Europe. Many people are used to call the E.U. and its member states Europe, but that's not really true. About half of the territory and about a third of the inhabitants of Europe are not in the E.U..

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:A big place, a wide range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. In America I can't remember when I paid a restaurant bill in cash but in Germany that's your only choice. I learned this the hard way and I bet I'm not the only one.

    3. Re:A big place, a wide range by GNious · · Score: 1

      Europe > EU > EMU (size-wise) :)

    4. Re:A big place, a wide range by radio4fan · · Score: 1

      Many restaurants outside of cities in lots of countries won't take plastic

      Even inside big cities.

      In Madrid and Barcelona many restaurants don't accept plastic. Presumably it makes them more competitive at the Spanish national sport of tax evasion.

  14. If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND PIN! by Optic7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case you didn't know, the cards that most banks are now issuing in the US are chip and signature, not chip and pin like in Europe, and I understand that there are some spots that DO NOT accept chip and signature, like unattended tolls, unattended gas stations, and possibly some unattended transportation ticket purchases (trains, etc).

    Pretty frustrating that credit card issuers decided to go this route in the US with some bullshit justification that people wouldn't know how to use the cards (WTF?).

    While the chip and signature is more resistant to skimming and duplication, it is no more secure than the old magnetic stripe cards if your physical card is stolen. I think they did this to prevent an increase in support costs instead (people requesting to reset PIN numbers, etc).

  15. And crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    See, with cash, all you can lose is what's in your pocket. With these cashless systems, a crook can clean out your entire bank account.

    Fraud protections? Ahahahahaa! See, while they are investigating the theft, your mortgage and other bill payments are bouncing. Now, the mortgage company and everyone else who was being paid charges you late and other fees. When you try to explain to them what happened, they just say, "Fuck you! Pay me!"

    Although, the CFPB here in the States has been a WONDERFUL agency (God Bless Elizabeth Warren!) for helping with the unethical and illegal bullshit that the banks and other financial institutions have been pulling. But the Republicans want to eliminate that wonderful agency because they have been bribed by the big banks and because of their delusional belief in the Free Markets.

    1. Re:And crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Because wire fraud and money scams were never a thing until the digital age. *eye roll*

    2. Re:And crooks by orlanz · · Score: 1

      So.... don't use debit cards? But credit cards are ok?

    3. Re:And crooks by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      So.... don't use debit cards? But credit cards are ok?

      People sometimes say that debit and credit cards are protected the same way because the limits are the same, but that's not true.

      If someone scams your debit card your money is gone until the bank decides you were scammed and puts it back, if they do. If someone scams your credit card your bank account still has money in it and the card issuer sends you a bill that you don't have to pay while the debt is being contested.

      I.e., under one system the money you need to feed your family is gone gone gone; in the other you may eventually have to pay it off over time or not. Think of the children, man!

  16. "fuck the poor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight up, that is the point of going "cashless." so that services can be denied to the very poor.

  17. Cash Please by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use a cc for some purchases.
    I NEVER use a debit card...

    Since the Target debacle, and many more like it, I have transitioned back to using cash almost exclusively.
    It appears to me that a cashless system is less robust and more likely to be taken advantage of by criminals.
    So yes, cashless apologists will whine about things like bank robberies, etc, but when it comes to what is best for me, not the bank, I choose cash please.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:Cash Please by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Well, the sorry state of banking and card security in the US has more to do with that than the technology itself.

    2. Re:Cash Please by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I would prefer to have something like a gift card for small transactions - with no connection to me or my back account. Same as cash. But until then I use the credit card for big purchases and minimize the exposure by paying cash for small ones.

    3. Re:Cash Please by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Have fun with your cash, but being pick pocketed, mugged, or robbed by police^H^H^H^H^H^H "highway men" is a way for you to lose cash without a way to remove it.

      With a credit card you are responsible for $50; however, every bank I've seen waives that and charges you nothing.

      Good call on not using your debit card. If something did happen, it's always better to have it be the bank's money locked up during an investigation on a unauthorized charge, then your money in your checking account.

    4. Re:Cash Please by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Most people have not been "pick pocketed, mugged, or robbed by police^H^H^H^H^H^H "highway men" in their entire lifetimes. While millions, like myself, have been screwed by things like the Target debacle. It was the one fucking time I'd been to Target in several years. Ditto on the debit cards...I'll never have one.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:Cash Please by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      I live in a relatively "safe" community, and the risk of mugging is always a possibility, however rare. I'm more worried about someone wanting to steal my phone...

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    6. Re:Cash Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here all cash for me. Credit cards are such a hassle. Everytime i use it they want to ID me. they want my phone number etc.. What a pain in the ass. I just pay with cash and no questions asked etc.. I have not been anywhere yet that does not except cash in the United States. I am pretty sure right now in Greece they would take cash for anything.

    7. Re:Cash Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cashless is best for the Govt and Corps who really love it when you give up your independance to them.
      Kudos to all you digital fiat lovers for feeding us your lives and that of your children and grandchildren.
      Signed, your friendly neighborhood Govt and Corps.

  18. Cash is still king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Governments worldwide, local and federal, increasingly are removing the ability to use cash. They cannot track it or you. Think that's tin foil hat thinking? Think again.

    Here is something I know for a fact is happening because I've talked to people in the industry that tracks metrics. Your bank sells information about you to bidders. Your purchase habits, how often, what, where. Guess who is curious and is a buyer? Your insurance companies, health, car, and house. You think for a second your rates are random. They were on the past based on a given area and the demographics. They are now being tailored to you. Those triple meat pizza you order a few times a week are being noted. The condoms, liquor, and glue you buy are likewise noted. The fetishes you have, your peccadilloes, your predilections, you name it are all being tracked, correlated, and used against in decisions about you. Some people know of this, some don't.

    When I eat out, I pay cash. When I buy wine and beer, I use cash. When I buy groceries, I use cash. I pay bills and such through my bank's bill pay system. Think this is not happening? Think again. Think your insurance companies don't look at your Facebook and Twitter accounts? Think again. This level of tracking is the new normal. Ever wonder why businesses want you to "friend" and "like" them? Ulterior motives, guys. To be certain. If I cannot pay cash, which, at least in America, is illegal not to accept, I don't play ball. I never give out my personal information, even to coworkers. Only my immediate boss has my mobile number, even the insurance companies don't have my SSN. They are not legally entitled. It took some fighting, and I called the SSA about it, and they said I only have to share it legally with my bank, my employer, and the IRS. No one else is legally entitled. So I refuse to give anyone anything. Yes, I'm a bit of a dick about it, but when I Google myself, my carefully curated life doesn't exist. Except for my name and address, nothing exists.

    Some say that nothing having an Internet presence in the form of Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin is damaging, especially for IT guys like me, but I've been in this industry for almost 20 years and have never had an issue with not being found online. Some say increasingly that employers look at all the usual online places and if they cannot find you, you are not worth hiring.

    Use cash as much as you can.

    1. Re:Cash is still king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your STILL tracked, and probably more then us.

      We fall in with the millions others. You on the other show a huge suspicious black hole. You stick out like a sore thumb, They may not track you as a individual "yet". But you and the few tens of thousands like are EXTREMELY high on the NSA's list. Your IP and every site you visit is being tracked right now probably. The more you try to hide the more a threat and the higher on the goverments list you go.

      You mind as change your name to "Muhammod" and start wearing a turban. \

      P.S. look up and say high to the drone tasked on you.

    2. Re:Cash is still king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with some of what you say, but my online footprint is nonexistant. I do nothing online but read news and research *nix stuff. I'm boring as hell. I'm prior military, so they know all about me.

      I disagree with having a Facebook account and putting myself out there. I really do have nothing to say to anyone or anything to share. My wife and I are fairly private and we like it this way. We don't engage in anything weird or suspicious, we just stay off the radar because we like privacy and disdain the narcissistic Facebook and Linkedin mess.

    3. Re:Cash is still king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They cannot track it or you. Think that's tin foil hat thinking? Think again.

      How you managed to lead with that, and then dive right into a 400 word paranoid rant was amazing.

    4. Re:Cash is still king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was referring to not using cash. Cash cannot be tracked, so the powers that be dislike it.

      Use a debit card or credit card and you are tracked a thousand ways and the data sold.

  19. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by xaxa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They did it as the credit card market is more competitive in the States. Many people have several cards, and the issuers felt that requiring people to remember a PIN would make it less likely that the shopper would choose their card.

  20. Mistrust the banks, so let's all deal with them! by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Setting aside cryptocurrencies, TFS is ludicrous. We mistrust the banks, so naturally we support moving in a direction that absolutely forces people to use financial institutions to facilitate basic transactions! Who do they think are going to be managing the deposits and transactions? Privacy? Forget about it. When everything is electronic, the government will be able to monitor everything beyond bartering.

  21. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they did this to prevent an increase in support costs instead (people requesting to reset PIN numbers, etc).

    You cannot reset the PIN on a French card, any more than you can change the two access codes for your apartment building -- it is fixed by the bank!

    More likely, people figured that Americans can't remember that many numbers. ;)

  22. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While that might not be the case in France, in the UK you can request a new PIN by jumping through some hoops with the bank. (Proving your identity etc.) If you know your current PIN, you can change it at a cash machine.

  23. This way they can charge negative interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Banning cash is a step on the road to negative interest, something that Europe is getting really into. Spend, spend, spend, after all, you can just keep printing money and adding zeroes, and everyone is rich!

  24. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, i can change the pin for all cards to be the same in all ATM of the issuer bank for 5 euro, so I cant see the point in this argument. just saying

  25. Stop-light beggars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they going to carry wifi card-readers? Maybe this is all a plot to eliminate begging.

  26. Most places in Europe only accept cash.. by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 0, Informative

    Most places in Europe, only accept cash. In the U.K. you must spend more than GBP 5.00. EUR 7.16. 7.80 USD. before you are allowed to use a debit card, or credit card in shopping centre/shopping complex/shopping mall. All imported goods must pay import VAT Import duty that are delivered to households addresses in cash. You can ask to pay by credit card and they will give you a web address card with your pay number on the card if you insist but they do not like doing that they prefer cash in hand. Unlike the U.S. most pensioners in Europe refuse to use credit cards because they associate it with borrowing money off of creditors a form of begging. Pensioners collect their money in cash from a "Post Office"

    1. Re:Most places in Europe only accept cash.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the U.K. you must spend more than GBP 5.00. EUR 7.16. 7.80 USD. before you are allowed to use a debit card, or credit card in shopping centre/shopping complex/shopping mall.

      You pulled that out your arse. I live in the UK and use my Debit card all the time and there is *no* simple rule like this, although in my (very considerable) experience the most common case is 'no minimum and no surcharge' for debit cards.
      I've also seen the following for Debit cards:
      Min £10
      Min £5 (common in pubs but not universal)
      Min £3 (e.g. one of my local sandwich shops)
      No minimum at all - this applies in nearly all major supermarkets and major stores - I bought a sandwich for £2.20 with my card this morning).
      No minimum but 50p transaction charge.
      Etc.

      And then there's a whole different set of charges (sometimes % charges) or lack of charges for credit cards.

      Why would you just make up random shit about stuff you obviously know nothing about? Did you go in one shop in the UK once and assume they were all the same?

  27. Partly a Staffing Saving by lostandthedamned · · Score: 2

    I'm a Retail Manager A Chip & Pin transaction at the till takes 30 seconds from triggering, Maybe 1/2 to 1/4 of the time for a properly checked Signature. Contactless (which is now at least 10% of my sales) takes 15 seconds. Across thousands of card transactions per day this is moving people through my tills faster meaning I have to have fewer people serving to keep customers moving at the same rate. ANY card that requires only signature that is used to pay in my store has to be verified with a telephone call as a matter of company policy, and we see maybe one such transaction per month. The burden of getting it wrong rests with my store, UK banks now take no responsibility for Signature card fraud.

  28. Signature in the States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The signature on the back of your card has nothing to do with ID. It's all about agreeing to their terms and conditions - i.e. screw you in the end.

    You didn't really think that American financial institutions are looking out for you?

    1. Re:Signature in the States by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      While I kind of agree with your sentiment, the signature in chip and signature refers to the signature you have to make on the terminal, not the signature on the back of the card.

  29. Cashless adoption! AH! by Noryungi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Full Disclosure: yes, I live in Europe.

    The largest cashless credit card payment system in France (Moneo) was just closed down very abruptly. Seems the whole ''cashless''/''contactless'' thing was just not profitable enough -- and not adopted enough -- to be continued.

    Read all about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    In a place like Greece, for instance, it is well known that the vast majority of transactions are paid in cash, not using a credit card or anything.

    I would take that kind of article with a large grain of salt on the side. Seems to me some bankers are declaring victory even before the war has started...

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Cashless adoption! AH! by twokay · · Score: 2

      In my experience (limited mainly to Germany i confess) cash is still very common for daily transactions, far more so than the UK.

      Most staff in a European restaurant/small shop/kiosk will give you an annoyed look if you mention "credit card", and often i have had to make my way to the one till in the establishment with a card reader connected to pay without cash.

      It's pretty much the opposite in the UK. If you don't have a wireless card reader expect lost sales.

      --
      Wannabe nerd.
    2. Re:Cashless adoption! AH! by ADRA · · Score: 1

      The largest payment cards by far are Visa and Mastercard, and they are quite active in Europe as they are everywhere else. But assuming you mean bank or nation congomerate systems, that may be the case (I don't know about the EU merchant wiring services personally).

      --
      Bye!
    3. Re:Cashless adoption! AH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full Disclosure: yes, I live in Europe.

      The largest cashless credit card payment system in France (Moneo) was just closed down very abruptly. Seems the whole ''cashless''/''contactless'' thing was just not profitable enough -- and not adopted enough -- to be continued.

      Read all about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      In a place like Greece, for instance, it is well known that the vast majority of transactions are paid in cash, not using a credit card or anything.

      I would take that kind of article with a large grain of salt on the side. Seems to me some bankers are declaring victory even before the war has started...

      At least back when it came out, Moneo was very unpopular with sellers because of the huge fees the banks had attached to it. It was meant for small purchases, but the fees made those too costly for business to accept it. I don't know if that had changed since 2005, though...

    4. Re:Cashless adoption! AH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Netherlands we had the Chipknip (chip wallet); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chipknip . Use was never really high and started to drop. But now it's also cheaper to chip and pin small amounts at stores. Wireless payments are now slowly trying to fill the mostly smaller amount payments.

      It's now also really easy to transfer money using your bank's app (for all mobile OSes). Great for splitting a bill with friends.

    5. Re:Cashless adoption! AH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full disclosure, i live in Europe: France

      Really for ship+pin, there's nothing to fear, as implemented here it s perfectly fine and abuse proof, unless you specifically want to hide your transactions.

      I never saw moneo, and i guess it's dead, because now banks issue contact-less credit cards, so no need for a special card (or maybe today we all have moneo).
      Contact less credit card is .... somehow OK, except :
      I would have liked a bit fat warning when they issued it, because it looks like the previous card; no special mention on it, maybe i d have taken special care of it.
      A special card holder shipped with it; to make sure it s secured.

    6. Re:Cashless adoption! AH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising, the driver behind this is oldfashioned capitalism. National systems such as Moneo popped up only because the big international systems (Maestro/Visa) were expensive (for retailers). Prices have dropped, and the local systems simply couldn't compete any longer with too small a market.

      And this is in fact one of the reasons why cashless is becoming more popular, not less. With less networks, the chances of your debit/credit card being accepted are higher, and with lower prices for retailers more and more of them have terminals.

    7. Re:Cashless adoption! AH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moneo was closed down, but contact-less payment with a regular credit card is growing fast. Much more convenient, there's no activation required and nothing else to do in places that accept it than tap to pay.

      I use it all the times in shops that support it (maybe half of those I go to regularly).

  30. Re:Mistrust the banks, so let's all deal with them by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Bartering has been making a comeback lately. Including businesses trading services with each other and ditching the cash aspect of the transaction.

  31. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Coisiche · · Score: 1

    I've reset the PIN on a UK card. I'm pretty sure you can do it at most ATMs.

  32. What's Cash? by GoJays · · Score: 1

    I live in Canada and I use debit for EVERYTHING. I will debit a purchase of less than a dollar, seriously. There is no service charge to use it and this way I don't have to have a pile of change in my pocket. It is much easiest to keep track of my purchases as they are all on my online statement. I never carry cash. I use my credit card only for online purchases.

    I recently went to the states and I noticed so many people still using cash. However, the bigger surprise was how many people used credit cards to pay for everything! (a beer at the pub, put it on credit) No wonder their financial system was in ruin back in 2008. I used my CC while in the states for the most part to avoid carrying cash. I noticed that they don't use the chip / pin. I was never asked to input my pin for my CC once while in the states. I found this odd. This has been standard in Canada for a few years now.

    1. Re:What's Cash? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I used to use my debit card too, but with the new Canadian Tire Options/Mastercard credit card I get Canadian Tire money on all my purchases. Buy groceries with the credit card, get CT money, go to CT to pay what I just bought. I then use this extra CT money to buy tools, etc.

      This post was not sponsored by Canadian Tire or Mastercard.

    2. Re:What's Cash? by CanadianLowell · · Score: 1

      I use debit for as much as I can too. I'd get rid of my CC if everyone that accepts CC would also accept debit VISA. There seem to be a few online stragglers like the gov't (license renewals, provincial campsite registrations, etc.) that don't yet accept debit visa. Still some hotels that won't take reservations without a CC too.

    3. Re:What's Cash? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      The problem with debit cards in the US is that there's virtually no consumer protection on them. If somebody steals your card and PIN, they can easily drain pretty much as much as they want from your bank account, up to whatever your bank's daily withdrawal limit is, and the only thing you can do is tell your bank that your number was stolen so they can cancel it and send you a new card. You'll never get that money back.

      Credit cards are better because although a thief doesn't need to steal a PIN, you can dispute unauthorized charges with your bank and they will dismiss them. So, they're less secure, but also much less risky. Put everything on your credit card and pay off your debt before your next monthly statement, and doesn't cost you anything.

      But that has nothing to do with the crash back in 2008, that was mostly due to the subprime mortgage crisis.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:What's Cash? by drpimp · · Score: 1

      CC and Debit are one in the same here for the most part when they are tied to your bank account. You might have a choice (if they ask), or they just run as credit/debit depending on the vendor. Either way it pulls from the same account so you shouldn't assume they are using a CC. That said, yes credit is a huge problem in the US.

      On a side note cash in Canada (via coins) was great. Looneys and Tooneys were perfect projectiles for strippers.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    5. Re:What's Cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder their financial system was in ruin back in 2008.

      Holy shit you are fucking ignorant.

    6. Re:What's Cash? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I live in Canada and I use debit for EVERYTHING. I will debit a purchase of less than a dollar, seriously.

      So you are the arsehole causing inflation in prices of small items in Canada? Grow up. What do you think adults did before debit cards? They carried cash.

      There is no service charge to use it and this way I don't have to have a pile of change in my pocket.

      You might not be paying for it directly but all of us end up paying more because the vendor is charged a fee by the card processor you dick. If you are using debit for transactions of less than 10 dollars at a mom and pop shop then you deserve to be mugged and beaten by the local thugs. Losers like you think only about yourself and not other consumers or the shop owners.

      It is much easiest to keep track of my purchases as they are all on my online statement. I never carry cash. I use my credit card only for online purchases.

      I recently went to the states and I noticed so many people still using cash. However, the bigger surprise was how many people used credit cards to pay for everything! (a beer at the pub, put it on credit) No wonder their financial system was in ruin back in 2008. I used my CC while in the states for the most part to avoid carrying cash. I noticed that they don't use the chip / pin. I was never asked to input my pin for my CC once while in the states. I found this odd. This has been standard in Canada for a few years now.

      Loser. You need to carry cash for emergencies. What if there is a market crash? What if there is a power outage? What if the debit system goes down?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    7. Re:What's Cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank's daily withdrawal limit is $400, I believe. An annoying loss, but it's hardly going to "drain" my bank account.

      With that said, it seems prudent these days to keep your money in multiple accounts and limit the amount kept in any checking account.

    8. Re:What's Cash? by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      If somebody steals your card and PIN, they can easily drain pretty much as much as they want from your bank account, up to whatever your bank's daily withdrawal limit is

      In my (Norwegian) bank, I can define my own withdrawal limits on my cards.

      I also have a separate bank account with no cards "attached" where I keep most of my monthly spending cash. If I need more available on my card I just send an SMS with the amount I want to transfer from my "safe" account to my "card" account. Takes about 3 seconds to get the money there and only costs me a few cents.

      So, I'm never worried about drained accounts.

      That said, my bank will cover any fraud unless they have strong reason to believe I've been negligent protecting the PIN code.

    9. Re:What's Cash? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You just completely baffled all the Americans.

    10. Re:What's Cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't use that, its bad for everyone except the banks!

    11. Re:What's Cash? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I guess I should have linked to this page in my post above.

      Sorry for the confusion, baffled Americans!

    12. Re:What's Cash? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I have had issues in the past where the travel agent goofed up and did not process payments to the Hotel I was staying at on time as they were supposed to.

      In those cases having a credit card that you can present to the Hotel while the payment gets processed is quite invaluable.

    13. Re:What's Cash? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > There is no service charge to use it and this way I
      > don't have to have a pile of change in my pocket.

      I Live in Canada (Toronto area) and some shops do charge 10 cents or so per transaction for debit cards. The fact that Canada has done away with pennies makes lugging around cash a bit easier.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  33. Europe is going toward a jobless economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no wonder cashless is being pushed, nobody has jobs anymore.

    1. Re:Europe is going toward a jobless economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Norway, unemployment rate is 3%, haven't used cash since 2009

  34. and either way, the banks win by Khashishi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whether cash or credit, it's all controlled by a cartel of banks.

    1. Re:and either way, the banks win by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Its an oligopoly. You throw enough money in a pile and jump thorugh a millions hoops, and you too can start a bank! So why not be less crack-pot and more enterprising and start a bank today!

      --
      Bye!
  35. Convenience makes it happen, though .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Sure... governments love cashless transactions (assuming they're traceable, and most are). But the real motivator for people to switch away from paying with cash is the convenience factor.

    For example, this morning, I used a smartphone app to pay the parking meter in the garage I parked in before going in to work. It still lets you pay with coins, but that's so impractical. For starters, it costs about $8/day to park, and the meter won't even let you put that much money into it using coins, at one time. So you're forced to make a trip back out to the meter to re-fill it if you want to avoid a ticket. With the cashless payment system, you just point the phone's camera at the QR code sticker on the meter, and you get billed automatically based on when you tell the app to stop counting time (or when the max. daily parking rate is reached).

    Same with the toll booths around here. Most have eliminated the option to pay tolls with cash except for one lane, and they're even discussing removing the baskets from those and going all electronic. Which is easier and more convenient? Making sure you've got a bunch of coins handy in your vehicle and having to stop and toss them into the toll basket, making sure it counted them all properly -- or just driving on through while an electronic pass device registers you going through it?

    IMO, the real solution here is an *anonymous* cashless transaction system. (Cue the bitcoin fanatics insisting that's exactly what they've got ... but not quite, since people are able to go back through the block-chain and sleuth out who moved money between accounts at a certain time.) I'm talking more about an official government and banking system sponsored e-cash alternative though. But I know it'll never see the light of day since government would have no motivation to spend effort and money designing a system with the very properties that frustrate them now with cash.

    1. Re:Convenience makes it happen, though .... by Misagon · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me as if the parking meter was designed to make you use the credit card.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:Convenience makes it happen, though .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sssssshhh let him sleep...

  36. Germany by koan · · Score: 2

    The more I read about Germany the more I want to move there, "convenience is the death of liberty".

    Going cashless is stupid.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Germany by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      You might want to visit first, and see if the interest in your move is mutual.

  37. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The European banks charge you to change a PIN on your card? Sheesh....

  38. Your card will likely not be welcome... by cardpuncher · · Score: 1
    In parallel with this trend, European countries are getting increasingly fussy about which cards they will accept. Recently, railways in The Netherlands, for example, wouldn't accept cards that had Visa or Mastercard logos - only V Pay or Maestro (European debit card variants). These latter aren't even routinely issued in the UK where most debit cards are branded Visa or Mastercard and are viewed as "credit" cards in most European countries. If you wanted to buy a railway ticket in Amsterdam station, your best bet as a visitor was normally to withdraw cash from the ATM and then queue at the ticket counter. There has been a recent change of policy, but you'll pay an additional 50c for the privilege of using your Visa/Mastercard.

    You'll also find that stored-value cards for things like transport are increasingly common and often the only way to get the best-value fares. However, the card will likely have limited geographical scope (eg the London Oyster Card), so if you're travelling widely you'll need a bunch of them or pay higher fares.

    While these schemes may make life easier/cheaper for locals, they can make life for visitors increasingly complicated.

    Mind you, these supposedly transnational card networks have always been rather parochial. A lot of years ago I came across an ATM in Germany with a handwritten signed attached saying "Nur Deutschen Eurokarten"...

    1. Re:Your card will likely not be welcome... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      However, the card will likely have limited geographical scope (eg the London Oyster Card), so if you're travelling widely you'll need a bunch of them or pay higher fares.

      London introduced the Oyster card before contactless credit/debit cards existed, and even before the standards for transport cards were completed.

      Since some time last year, contactless credit/debit/phone payments have been accepted on the London Underground, trains, buses and trams. There were suggestions in the media that Transport for London wanted to reduce Oyster card use, since it costs them more. I can believe that, with the huge number of adverts encouraging people to use contactless cards.

  39. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by twasserman · · Score: 1
    Absolutely correct. Ticketing machines, such as those in European train stations at airports, also require Chip and PIN. You also can't use the Vélib (Paris) or other bike rental systems without a PIN.

    For many years, US banks thought that it was cheaper to eat their losses on fraud from unchipped cards rather than join the modern world with chip-and-pin. The Target breach seems to have changed some thinking there, but the current chip-and-signature cards only help a bit. You're able to use them in European restaurants, grocery stores, etc. No need yet for a chip card if you go to Asia or the South Pacific, except in Burma (Myanmar) and Bhutan, which are mostly cash economies.

    I continually request a chip-and-pin card from the banks where we have credit cards. I've told them all that I will move all of our credit cards to whichever bank is first to replace my current card with a chip-and-pin variety of the same card. If you want chip-and-pin, call the toll-free number on the back of your credit card(s) and make your request.

  40. Always pay cash! It's anonymous and you control it by ciaran2014 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cash transactions aren't linked to your name and stored in a database forever, and the cash in your pocket can't be deactivated by banks or a government.

    (Yes, some smart Alec will point out ways to track and block bank notes, but this is waaaaaaaaay more difficult and waaaaaaaaaaaay less effective than what banks and governments can do to electronic money.)

    --
    Help build the anti-software-patent wiki
  41. Sorry Eurofags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But America is going to stick with cold hard cash, because our whores accept nothing else.

    1. Re:Sorry Eurofags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to say sorry. Who would trust a whore that takes credit cards with his cash?

  42. Lol @ angry comments, feeling behind, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans don't deserve to live like white European people

    But don't worry, everything else European will eventually be adopted by 2nd world country USA with 5-10 years lag

    1. Re:Lol @ angry comments, feeling behind, are we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not behind that you are seeing .... America is just so far ahead of you we are about to lap you. If you're not first ... YOUR LAST! Shake n' Bake!

  43. bass-ackwards by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    Except the credit card is issued by the bank, can be revoked by the bank, is processed through the bank, and is probably linked to a bank account. I'm scared of snakes, I'm going to jump into the pit of vipers!

  44. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure what the French are up to. But almost any ATM in the UK i walk past on the way home today will let me reset my PIN instantly.

  45. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And realize that you're going to get screwed for exchanging money to Euros vs. whatever your bank or currency exchange would have done for you for cash. This really sucks for anyone who doesn't have an account in Euros. Ask a Canadian just how much "fun" visiting the US without cold hard US cash is for an example (Though in the US there's plenty you can't pay for with a CC, using a Canadian debit card in a US machine is just asking to pay horrendous fees).

    No thanks. Though I suppose Europe doesn't really care about tourists. :)

  46. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    https://www.wellsfargo.com/chi...

    So are those cards not Chip and PIN by virtue of... "Sign *or* enter your Personal Identification Number (PIN) if prompted." ?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  47. No, bring cash by Skylinux · · Score: 2

    If you plan to visit Europe make sure your credit card has a chip, or you won't be able to use self-service machines.

    No, bring cash! We use debit cards for purchases since most people don't have or use credit cards. Especially smaller shops will refuse your business when you come in with a real credit card and only intend to purchase something below 100 Euro.

    Good luck with your Visa or Amex over here ;)

    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    1. Re:No, bring cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure these small shop owners realize that what they are doing is against their merchant contract.

  48. shitty blog is shitty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this story is complete bullshit. Cash is legal tender and is required to be accepted everywhere you have to pay anything.

  49. Re:US and Canada by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they have the portable card readers next door in Canada.

    Actually, the chip on my AmEx Blue card is TOO advanced for some vendors. The reader wouldn't take the magstripe because it somehow detected that it was a chip card, so the vendor had me stick it into the contact reader. However, AmEx just upgraded my card to the RFID and got rid of the contact reader a few months ago due to "security reasons". So... my fancy new chip card wouldn't work and I had to pull out my old FCU VISA magstripe backup card instead.

    I don't know why the RFID would have less security issues than a contact patch, though, but I'm sure there are decent exploits for each... probably more interesting ones with the proximity radios.

  50. Don't worry, cash is still preferred for bribes by TrentTheThief · · Score: 2

    Cash won't disappear unless the intent is to cripple the economy. After all, it's easier to slip someone a hundred euro that trade electronic payment details. And I doubt if the EU gov't office drones will accept debit cards for bribes.

    1. Re:Don't worry, cash is still preferred for bribes by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      You can always give them a bottle of whiskey instead of cash.

    2. Re:Don't worry, cash is still preferred for bribes by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

      Whiskey in a large enough quantity to be truly useful is prohibitively hard to conceal and transfer. Whereas a palm full of high denomination paper bills slide across quite handily ;-)

      That's why I love the Euro so much. €500 notes pack a lot of bang in a small package.

  51. Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always prefer to steal cash than credit and debit cards. It's untraceable, it's unrecallable, most likely not covered by the victim's insurance either. It's not as easy to spend it on eBay, but hey... that means I'm supporting my local economy :)

    In all seriousness though: if you want to have your cake and eat it too, you want the UK. That's because most ATMs don't charge withdrawal fees, so you can keep your money "safe" in the bank (safer than in a duffel bag anyway), and withdraw what you need and spend it anonymously.

  52. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Or that they wouldn't remember secondary PINs. I was recently on holiday, my VISA card that I use regularly is no problem but at one hotel it wouldn't work. I also had a Mastercard as backup, but I didn't remember the PIN and somehow they didn't want to/was able to do the signature + ID thing. So I paid in cash, oh well no business for Mastercard.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  53. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is mis-trust driving a cashless society?

    The last thing anybody should do is trust the banks with a cashless system. They will be the masters and you the slaves.

  54. cashless society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is coming but you should be aware that if you don’t hold in your hand and something someone (put three letter agency here) decides that you are needed for a interview you are basically fucked all the way, you add this to total populace programing by TV, well you won’t be able to move far away in system like that and we are almost there

    also no more bank runs as simple as that :)

  55. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    From that page, it sounds like Wells Fargo did the right thing and enabled PIN as well as signature. Good to know for the future if I need a US credit card with chip and pin. Thanks!

  56. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by jittles · · Score: 1

    In case you didn't know, the cards that most banks are now issuing in the US are chip and signature, not chip and pin like in Europe, and I understand that there are some spots that DO NOT accept chip and signature

    My understanding is that it is a two part process. The US is doing chip and signature for a few years and then will transition to chip and pin once the hardware all transitions. The purpose of the transition is due to a legislative change that puts the liability for transaction fraud on the weakest link in the card processing chain. If the card is EMV capable (chip and pin/signature) and the card reader is magnetic swipe, then the merchant bears the liability on accepting the swipe. If the merchant has EMV terminals and the card is magnetic swipe only, then the card issuer is liable. Most people in the US would not know their credit card PIN unless they routinely make cash advances. In a year or two the banks will start issuing or forcing people to reset their PIN somehow.

  57. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Good point, I think I remember reading this justification as well. Oh well, give the customer a substandard product that doesn't cause them any inconvenience.

  58. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the confirmation, and additional info about the bike rental stations. I don't think the Target breach had anything to do with the move to chip cards. There was a deadline established years ago for everyone to move to the new system by October 2015 (in most cases). This article has some pretty good information on this shift, and current progress.

    Let us know which banks you've found so far that are issuing chip and pin cards. I've been following this for a while and looked a few months ago and they were very rare. However, someone commented further down that Wells Fargo cards are both signature and pin, which is pretty cool.

  59. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not in here. There is no charge at all to change the PIN. You can do it at the ATM itself it's just like changing your password in any web site.

    Now forgetting the PIN on your card and requesting a new card might involve a fee...

  60. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    That's not always the case. Regarding the actual exchange rate, I had read before that the exchange rate on card transactions are more favorable to the traveler than doing a cash exchange (likely because of the volume that the banks do).

    Regarding the extra fees that some banks charge on foreign transactions (many charge 3%), thankfully not all banks charge that! For instance, Capital One is one of the few that does not charge a foreign transaction fee to their cardholders.

  61. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    That's interesting. I would like to learn more, if you have any references you can provide. I vaguely recall reading something to that effect, but I think I wrote it off as being either subtly implied, or just conjecture on someone's part, or it being dependent on some onerous pre-conditions. In other words, it seemed to me to be something that was not very likely to happen. I would love to get some confirmation otherwise.

  62. Haven't used cash in ages... by SirJorgelOfBorgel · · Score: 1

    I do indeed live in Europe, and I pay for something with cash maybe once every few weeks. ATM (maestro, instant bank account transfer) card is used for everything in my country, from groceries to parking meters, to buying a car. Even random tiny vendor at backwater music festival will have a mobile card machine accepting them. Unlike some other countries there's no minimum acceptable amount for carding.

    Credit cards are now accepted in most places as well, but certainly far from all, and there may be an extra fee. It depends on the card machine really, most card payment machines these days (fixed as well as mobile), regardless of the venue, will accept credit cards as long as they have both a chip and the PIN functionality. But every once in a while you'll encounter an old machine, or a machine with a slot that doesn't fit the credit card's extra height due to the relief of the numbers on it.

    My American friends keep trying to convince me their credit card system is better, with all sorts of benefits if you play it right, insurance, etc. But we have consumer protections laws here that mean you don't really need that insurance, benefits are just costs siphoned somewhere else, the extra % for the charge is just thrown away money, and I like that my checking account immediately reflects spent funds.

    What do I still use cash for? The increasingly rare parking meter that only accepts coins, and for leaving tips. Once in a while I'll pay somewhere in big bills just to get little ones and coins back to leave for tips in restaurants and bars. That is one thing the US does infinitely better: you can write the tip amount on the check. I really don't get why that system hasn't been adopted here, as I (and all the other locals) will always pay with our cards, and if no cash is on hand, no tip will be left (adding the tip to the carded amount usually means the money goes to the boss, not your waiters and chefs and whatnot). Of course, our waiters are actually paid real-people-wages unlike the US, but still.

  63. Well, there are beggar EVERYWHERE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europe is now a cesspool of human suffering with beggars at every street corner. The only way that you can avoid them is by having no cash. "Sorry, no cash" and they leave you alone.

  64. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by jittles · · Score: 2

    I would love to get some confirmation otherwise.

    See Four for information about how the EMV transition will work. Basically there are two entities involved in determining whether to use chip and pin for each transaction. The card issuer has to issue a PIN for the card. The payment processor has to have hardware and infrastructure to verify the PIN in order for the chip and PIN portion to work. The payment processor works on behalf of the merchant accepting the transaction. Everyone wants to pass the financial responsibility of fraud up the chain from merchant to the card issuer. Eventually the US will transition to chip and PIN just to avoid liablity.

  65. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by hawaiian717 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are, at the moment, three issuers of PIN-preferred cards in the United States: United Nations Federal Credit Union, First Tech Federal Credit Union, and Harvard University Employees Federal Credit Union. The first two anyone can join by first becoming a member of a particular nonprofit association. Given a choice, I would go for First Tech (or the Harvard Alumni card if you qualify) since they offer no foreign transaction fees and support all PIN variations (where the PIN can either be verified by the card itself or over the network by the bank); UNFCU only offers no foreign transaction fees on a card with an annual fee (you'd have to decide for yourself if the annual fee is worth the other additional benefits).

    There is one other PIN-preferred option, the Diners Club MasterCards issued by BMO Harris Bank. However, they stopped taking applications several months ago and haven't resumed, so they're not an option at present if you don't already have it.

    Two other fairly large issuers, USAA and Navy Federal Credit Union, were offering PIN-preferring cards but switched to Signature preferring.

    But one question to consider is if you need a PIN-preferring card, or merely one that supports PIN? In the latter case, you'll still sign most of the time but if you encounter a situation where a PIN is required, it will work. Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, and Synchrony Bank (they issue a lot of affiliate branded cards like Walmart and Banana Republic) all fall into this category. A PIN preferring card would allow you to more easily blend in in Europe, but for now would actually be harder to use in the US; particularly in restaurants since even those that have switched to EMV card readers are still doing the thing where they take your card away from the table, so you'd end up having to go with them to wherever they have the terminal set up to enter your PIN, rather than being like Europe and Canada where the waiter has a portable credit card reader that they bring to your table.

    --
    End of Line.
  66. Re:Always pay cash! It's anonymous and you control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is my concern as well.

    If the government ( or anyone with the authority ) decides they don't like you or the business you run, they just freeze your accounts and that's pretty much the end of things. In the time period it takes to fix any misunderstandings, you're really hurting financially if not outright bankrupt. Where authorities can just confiscate property like cash without charging you with a crime, one can understand the lack of trust I hope.

    If, like most folks, you only have accounts in one country, you're pretty much screwed.

    Will have to open multiple accounts across the planet to ensure any one government doesn't completely ruin your life.

  67. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

    It's not a legislative mandate in the United States. The liability shift is a policy change by Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and Discover to entice merchants and card issuers to switch to EMV.

    I have heard some speculation that the US is doing a phased migration and will eventually to a switch to Chip and PIN, but nothing definitive. I know Chase had said they would change, then put that off after customer testing supposedly showed a preference for Signature over PIN.

    --
    End of Line.
  68. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    We've had PIN since at least 1992, and most people don't expect to be able to change the PIN or most likely never ever thought about it.
    I guess it used to be fused in at the factory. Making it rewritable just adds complexity and perhaps a security issue.

  69. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    That's funny, I just linked the same article above and had not noticed this point because I was looking for something else! Anyway, thanks - it's encouraging to hear that they seem to be planning to go all the way to chip and pin, and that some banks are already issuing cards for both signature/pin.

    I hope that they won't eventually try to push fraud liability to the consumer, as apparently they do in Europe! I definitely wouldn't put it past the financial industry though.

  70. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Super informative post - thank you very much! I think you pretty much answered all my questions. I appreciate it.

  71. Mistrust of banks? by nhstar · · Score: 1

    If you're mistrust is with the banks, how does using a cashless system avoid that? Now ~all~ of the transactions have to go through banks faster and more frequently than with cash.

    Am I missing something in this?

    --
    --- no sig to see here... move along.
  72. Re:Bingo, Retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is cash REALLY that fucking HARD for you guys?
    I mean, fuck, SERIOUSLY, can you not just stuff a few bills and coins in your pocket like EVERY SINGLE MOTHERFUCKER SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME HAS DONE?
    What the fuck.
    All you're doing is giving up your privacy, giving up more of your LIFE and PERSON to be BOUGHT SOLD and CONTROLLED by THE MAN.
    All you people demanding "cashless" are just a bunch of STUPID fucking SHEEPLE.
    Fuck you, and fuck the GOVT and CORP TEAT you all are sucking on.
    Grow some balls and become independant, not dependant.
    Fucktards.

  73. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

    You're welcome. You might find this FAQ on a subreddit I help moderate useful too:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/chipc...

    --
    End of Line.
  74. Untimely warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I am in France with a US credit card, an early flight tomorrow morning, and no way to refill the tank in my rental car until the gas station attendants start their shift, which is probably after my flight has left.

    Looks like I'll be waking up extra early and hypermiling my way to the airport. Please disregard the funny looking Citroen moving at half the speed limit.

  75. OT, sorry by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    Dude, your vault has internet access too?

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  76. Iceland is already there by johnslater · · Score: 1

    I just got back from a 6-day visit to Iceland. For the first time visiting a foreign country, I completed the trip without needing to acquire any local currency. I paid for everything using my US-based credit card using chip and signature. A couple of transactions (pay and display parking) were automated without any need for either PIN or signature.

    1. Re:Iceland is already there by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      For the first time visiting a foreign country, I completed the trip without needing to acquire any local currency

      FFS, just bring dollars. You know who doesn't accept dollars? Cause I don't. Europe, Asia, whereever.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  77. Not necessarily cashless yet by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Around here it's about 95% card swipe, 5% cash only. And this is in the northeast U.S. I do know merchants all over are going to have to upgrade their card hardware to be able to accept chip and pin by 2016 though.

    I wonder how that impacts things like Square reader - lots of smaller merchants use that now.
    And I'm in the southeast New England.

  78. Re:Bingo, Retards by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Reading between the lines I get the feeling that you don't like credit cards.

  79. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    You know you can pick PIN numbers right? There's no reason why different cards need different PINs. The PINs can typically be changed at any ATM.

  80. Small transactions? How about the presidency? by Chemtox · · Score: 1

    Transport? Small transactions? Way behind the times Europe.

    In México, the presidency was bought with prepaid supermarket cards.

  81. Cashless society = Surveillance society by ivec · · Score: 1

    A Cashless society is a Surveillance society - Absolutely.
    This is why several governments actually put restrictions on cash purchases:
          http://www.forbes.com/sites/jo...
    1000 Euros ceiling already exist in France and Italy for cash transactions. Bank withdrawals totaling over 10'000 Euros per year also get reported !

    Cash payments, like bank secrecy, is what allows lambda citizens to keep a bit of privacy. When payments become traceable (1'000 € limit today), and important withdrawals are reported to authorities (10'000 € yearly limit), it is not drug dealers but the middle class that is targeted. The 1% richest and the powerful are still able to use other tricks to launder their money.

  82. Re:Always pay cash! It's anonymous and you control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the cash in your pocket can't be deactivated by banks or a government.

    Oh, yes, they can.

    That's not even counting the deliberate inflation that is 'deactivating' it gradually without you paying attention.

  83. Hey, Germany by kmoser · · Score: 1

    Since cash is working out so well for you, how much do you think my Reichmarks are worth these days?

  84. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they just started issuing out new VISA cards, but to my knowledge, MasterCard has yet to be on the ball. I'm sure the fiasco with Target and Home Depot had a lot to do with the push.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  85. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by DigiShaman · · Score: 1
    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  86. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Cool, thanks for this FAQ too!

  87. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I hope that those breaches lit a fire under some people's asses. I was hit by both of them, and more (like 3 or 4) in the span of a year or less.

  88. Re:If visiting Europe, card should have chip AND P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand how your apartment building works if you have 2 access codes, neither of which can be modified.

    The apartments I've lived in used access cards.