You clearly don't know what "Marxist" means, yet appear certain that you think you do. No wonder you frequently get all confused and start making bizarre claims.
Iran has shown it is serious. That has already happened. You not knowing about it doesn't mean it didn't happen. You seem to be confusing your surface understanding of this issue with the entire body of knowledge amassed before and during the talks. You do this a lot. No wonder you get so confused sometimes.
History has shown that progress happens through diplomacy or war. Ignoring resourceful countries full of academics doesn't end well for anyone. You are insisting on punishing the Iranian people for the alleged crimes of their leaders, which is fucking disgusting and makes you look an absolute cunt.
You seem to have oversimplified things to the point of a comic book. Some governments have realised that there is no reason for everyone to get guns when they feel the desire, as the cost to society of a shit-tonne of dead people & trials is far greater than an imagined ability to restrain government through said guns. Seeing as the US army will either side with the populace (and negate their need for guns), or side with the government (and destroy anyone who raises a weapon at them, negating the need for said guns), it's a moot point. Plus just ask anyone coming back from Iraq or Afghanistan what they're more concerned about in the field - guns or explosives. Hint: it's not guns, and anyone can make explosives rather easily. Some societies would rather not throw away the peace of today for an imagined future nightmare.
The elimination thing you're discussing has been debunked so many times it's now a great indicator of someone who is unaware of the truth, or someone to whom the truth doesn't matter. Thanks for clearing that up.
Israel has repeatedly threatened to blow the crap out of Iranian infrastructure, when even their own Mossad doesn't think Iran has or even wants nuclear weapons. Trying to paint Israel as some restrained, civilised country is fucking nuts. That doesn't exonerate Iran, of course, but then you seem to be confusing Iran's loud, overzealous religious leadership with the sensible statesmanship of their current president & his staff.
There you go moving your goalposts again. The discussion was about civility. Killing thousands for the death of dozens (who were killed because of previous attacks which killed thousands) is not civil. Killing a few dozen is also not civil, but in the grand scheme of things seems a lot more civil than taking your massively-funded military on a civilian killing spree for no purpose other than stirring up contempt which can be used later in the election campaign or when grandstanding for the international media in order to coerce the foreign policy of other nations with regards to aid and diplomatic support of your enemies.
You are the confused one, remember. The number of times you've argued your opinion only to be shown it's factually incorrect, or the number of times you've screwed up basic concepts is simply amazing. Your hubris knows no bounds, it appears.
The rockets being launched cause absolutely minimal damage. Israel likes to point at them as they are the very limit of threat Israel faces, and are easily dealt with, yet will do anything it can to cause enough upset in the Palestinian areas in order to cause more rockets. The more Israel is under attack the less likely their government will be voted out, and the more likely they are to get more aid from other countries. The conflict is great business for Israel.
But whatever. I'm sure your once-sentence appraisal is entirely accurate. Wait - you don't know the difference between land and sea ice, so maybe your post is just as screwed up as that.
1. They are for the cleaners, hence the sign 2. There are emergency phones & alarms for contacting help, which are preferred as they allow for easier relaying of location, and always work (unlike spotty cellphone reception)
Would you also be fine if the people using your outlet plugged in devices which could cause problems such as fires? The outlet in question looks like a regular outlet, but the power it supplies fluctuates wildly as the train passes between sections of track powered by different substations. There is a reason it's not supposed to be used by the public...
The size doesn't matter, as there are equally sized parts of the US with shitty public transport. If a Swiss city can manage it, there is no reason for other cities to not manage it. The train is much faster for long distances than cars - hell, it is frequently quicker than flying. They travel at nearly 200mph, for crying out loud, on well-planned train tracks, and can take you several countries away in comfort, with full restaurant service, wifi, etc. Have you even been to Switzerland?
Public transport works great in some places. The ability for US cities to effectually implement it speaks more of said cities than it does of public transport.
It can be both, you know. Regardless, we've seen what rampant competition in public travel causes, and it's not good for anyone except the eventual winner. It seems your understanding of the history of public transport is woefully limited.
That was tried. It didn't end well, hence the current situation, which is terrible in the US but seemingly workable in other places, sometimes to great effect. Having people's lives depend on the prospecting of others is never a good idea. The owners might lose some money, but people will lose their jobs in the process. Again, we know this from history.
Not true. In a town or city with decent support for homeless people, they don't bother wasting time or money on public transport. They have shelters, food, support, and so on.
Slashdot Mirror
Then government would have to pay people who couldn't afford to leave in order for them to be able to leave...
The industrial revolution started at least over 250 years ago, fyi.
You clearly don't know what "Marxist" means, yet appear certain that you think you do. No wonder you frequently get all confused and start making bizarre claims.
Iran has shown it is serious. That has already happened. You not knowing about it doesn't mean it didn't happen. You seem to be confusing your surface understanding of this issue with the entire body of knowledge amassed before and during the talks. You do this a lot. No wonder you get so confused sometimes.
History has shown that progress happens through diplomacy or war. Ignoring resourceful countries full of academics doesn't end well for anyone. You are insisting on punishing the Iranian people for the alleged crimes of their leaders, which is fucking disgusting and makes you look an absolute cunt.
You don't have weapons as good as the front-line troops, so the point is moot.
You seem to have oversimplified things to the point of a comic book. Some governments have realised that there is no reason for everyone to get guns when they feel the desire, as the cost to society of a shit-tonne of dead people & trials is far greater than an imagined ability to restrain government through said guns. Seeing as the US army will either side with the populace (and negate their need for guns), or side with the government (and destroy anyone who raises a weapon at them, negating the need for said guns), it's a moot point. Plus just ask anyone coming back from Iraq or Afghanistan what they're more concerned about in the field - guns or explosives. Hint: it's not guns, and anyone can make explosives rather easily. Some societies would rather not throw away the peace of today for an imagined future nightmare.
The elimination thing you're discussing has been debunked so many times it's now a great indicator of someone who is unaware of the truth, or someone to whom the truth doesn't matter. Thanks for clearing that up.
Israel has repeatedly threatened to blow the crap out of Iranian infrastructure, when even their own Mossad doesn't think Iran has or even wants nuclear weapons. Trying to paint Israel as some restrained, civilised country is fucking nuts. That doesn't exonerate Iran, of course, but then you seem to be confusing Iran's loud, overzealous religious leadership with the sensible statesmanship of their current president & his staff.
Apart from all the other places where it's safe to be of an ethnic or religious minority, sure. Your ignorance is astounding.
According to you.
There you go moving your goalposts again. The discussion was about civility. Killing thousands for the death of dozens (who were killed because of previous attacks which killed thousands) is not civil. Killing a few dozen is also not civil, but in the grand scheme of things seems a lot more civil than taking your massively-funded military on a civilian killing spree for no purpose other than stirring up contempt which can be used later in the election campaign or when grandstanding for the international media in order to coerce the foreign policy of other nations with regards to aid and diplomatic support of your enemies.
You are the confused one, remember. The number of times you've argued your opinion only to be shown it's factually incorrect, or the number of times you've screwed up basic concepts is simply amazing. Your hubris knows no bounds, it appears.
The rockets being launched cause absolutely minimal damage. Israel likes to point at them as they are the very limit of threat Israel faces, and are easily dealt with, yet will do anything it can to cause enough upset in the Palestinian areas in order to cause more rockets. The more Israel is under attack the less likely their government will be voted out, and the more likely they are to get more aid from other countries. The conflict is great business for Israel.
But whatever. I'm sure your once-sentence appraisal is entirely accurate. Wait - you don't know the difference between land and sea ice, so maybe your post is just as screwed up as that.
There is no evidence Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. Even Mossad doesn't think there is evidence.
1. They are for the cleaners, hence the sign
2. There are emergency phones & alarms for contacting help, which are preferred as they allow for easier relaying of location, and always work (unlike spotty cellphone reception)
Would you also be fine if the people using your outlet plugged in devices which could cause problems such as fires? The outlet in question looks like a regular outlet, but the power it supplies fluctuates wildly as the train passes between sections of track powered by different substations. There is a reason it's not supposed to be used by the public...
Even when there is a sign next to it which states "Not fair game"?
It was BS 1363 (introduced in 1947) which standardised the plugs, not the EU.
This is an overground train, more similar to an S-Bahn or Regiobahn than an IC or ICE.
The size doesn't matter, as there are equally sized parts of the US with shitty public transport. If a Swiss city can manage it, there is no reason for other cities to not manage it. The train is much faster for long distances than cars - hell, it is frequently quicker than flying. They travel at nearly 200mph, for crying out loud, on well-planned train tracks, and can take you several countries away in comfort, with full restaurant service, wifi, etc. Have you even been to Switzerland?
Just like the roads, and pretty much every other piece of infrastructure out there.
Public transport works great in some places. The ability for US cities to effectually implement it speaks more of said cities than it does of public transport.
It can be both, you know. Regardless, we've seen what rampant competition in public travel causes, and it's not good for anyone except the eventual winner. It seems your understanding of the history of public transport is woefully limited.
That was tried. It didn't end well, hence the current situation, which is terrible in the US but seemingly workable in other places, sometimes to great effect. Having people's lives depend on the prospecting of others is never a good idea. The owners might lose some money, but people will lose their jobs in the process. Again, we know this from history.
The buses get grouped together as they get stuck in traffic. It's a common phenomenon.
Not true. In a town or city with decent support for homeless people, they don't bother wasting time or money on public transport. They have shelters, food, support, and so on.