Slashdot Mirror


Man Arrested After Charging iPhone On London Overground Train

An anonymous reader writes: 45-year-old Robin Lee was arrested after he used a socket on a London Overground train to charge up his iPhone. He was handcuffed and arrested for "abstracting electricity". Robin was then charged with "unacceptable behaviour" after "becoming aggressive" when objecting to his first arrest. The Guardian reports: "Speaking to the Evening Standard, Lee said he had been confronted by a police community support officer on the overground train from Hackney Wick to Camden Road on 10 July. The Overground is part of Transport For London’s wider network that also includes London Underground and the buses. 'She said I’m abstracting electricity. She kept saying it’s a crime. We were just coming into the station and there happened to be about four police officers on the platform. She called to them and said: ‘This guy’s been abstracting electricity, he needs to be arrested’.”

674 comments

  1. Tax dollars at work. by The+Rizz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yup. Let's spend thousands of dollars worth of man-hours and paperwork and court time over 10 cents worth of electricity.

    1. Re:Tax dollars at work. by amalcolm · · Score: 4, Funny

      You do realize this is the UK? We don't use dollars here. I agree however, with the sentiment of your post.

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    2. Re:Tax dollars at work. by The+Rizz · · Score: 1, Informative

      You do realize this is the UK? We don't use dollars here.

      Yup, I realize, but typed what I was thinking without slowing down to convert units. Regardless, this is the internet and I'm pretty sure everyone knows what is meant. If someone from Europe commenting on a US issue talks about the waste of pounds or euros most people here understand that, too.

    3. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a power-trip thing. For the arresting officer, I mean... not the phone.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:Tax dollars at work. by gweilo8888 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do realize it's a private company doing the freaking out, and not public sector, right? LORAL has a contract on suburban rail in Greater London and parts of Hertfordshire through next year.

      Sure, they're wasting police time and court time, but we normally herp derps only about government waste around these parts. The private sector is infallible, and if you suggest otherwise you get called a lib.

    5. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Kkloe · · Score: 1

      there are rules and laws for a reason, and those thousands of * will be spent anyway because the government will not stop paying the people even if they had less things to do(thats highly unlikely)

      now lets talk about that the time and resources could be used for better things instead

      and side note, here they have realised that ppl might want to charge their phones\latptops\whatever so they have installed plugs for use in the overground, underground and trains

    6. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup. Let's spend thousands of dollars worth of man-hours and paperwork and court time over 10 cents worth of electricity.

      Not even close.

      UK average price per kWH: 0.15 GBP1
      iPhone battery capacity: 4.12 WH to 11.1 WH2
      iPhone charging efficiency: 61%3

      So assuming he fully-charged his iPhone 6 Plus, 11.1WH * 0.61 * 0.15/1000 = 0.00101565, he would have used 0.1 UK cents worth of electricity. If he was using an iPhone with a smaller battery and/or didn't charge the phone all of the way, the power consumed would be even less.

      Sources:

      1. 1. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416987/table_224.xls
      2. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone
      3. 3. http://kjordahl.net/blog/?p=82
    7. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this should be grounds for kicking that stupid company out of this business. Tell them to take their trains and go home.

    8. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be different, but you do have the same flavor of do-gooder as we do.

    9. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the police man was just enforcing the laws written by the legislature. He was just doing the job he was supposed to be doing. How about faulting the legislature that made up all these bullshit rules and regulations. It is not possible to go throughout the day without breaking the law. Many of the laws contradict themselves. If you have police that selectively enforce the law you will have the problem of selective enforcement.

      What you really need is Judge Dred; e.g someone that creates and enforces the laws through the power of his own awesomeness. No need for a court system. You disagree with the law. They you have to be more of a badass than the judges. simple

    10. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not 10 cents worth. For 10 cents you can get one kilowatt hour. Usually phone chargers are 5-10W (5V * 1-2A). So even you use 10W charger for one hour, it's only 0.1 cents of electricity. Therefore the charge is completely ridiculous.

    11. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, no. It was a PCSO, a part-time cop's helper, who made all the fuss, not the train company.

      The real cops decided not to arrest the guy because they realized it wasn't worth it, but he was then such an irritating piece of shit that they re-arrested him for being a dick in a public place.

      Both the fake cop and the "I need to charge my iPhone, waaa" baby are clearly morons.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    12. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...he would have used 0.1 UK cents worth of electricity...

      grrr.... it's "pence" not "cents".

      If you're going to go all the effort of converting to GBP, you could have at least got that right, couldn't you?

    13. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sumdumass · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why? Is it all that different from me tethering to your electric and using it for my own purposes? Is there some sort of law saying electrical outlet are fair game for all.

      Forgot about the miniscule amount of energy for a minute. Would it be ok to run an extension cord from an outlet on your porch to power my fan when I get overheated riding my bike near your house? I know, someone will say but that is private property and this is government property. I respond with does that mean i can walk into a government building and grab some paper or just start using the photocopiers?

      There is a principle involved here. Even if something needs changed to allow this conduct, it still needs changed to distinguish between it.

    14. Re:Tax dollars at work. by smallfries · · Score: 4, Funny

      Calling a penny a "UK cent" is an understandable slip, but your use of decimals and units seems to be spot on. Have you consider Verizon customer "care" as a career path?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    15. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1968 law was written before phones and chargers, so it was not the law that is to blame, rather an officer applying it to the most minor thing and then getting pissy about it when he objected. I've turn the heating on on trains before, am I stealing heat?

      'Robin was then charged with "unacceptable behaviour" after "becoming aggressive"'

      i.e. complaining is now unacceptable and aggressive.

      If he sued her for slander, for those 'aggresive' claims would that be acceptable? She is a Community Support nazi, they have no real job, they go around trying to find minor infractions to justify their role. Micromanaging ordinary people with their drivel. She should have simply told him to stop and moved on, but this is the UK, its over-policed, and the police constantly need to justify their existence.

    16. Re:Tax dollars at work. by digitig · · Score: 4, Informative

      No court time at all for abstracting the electricity. If you read the article (yes, I know, I know...) you'll learn that the police agreed this was a ridiculous arrest and de-arrested him ("de-arrested" is more of a statement than simply releasing him without charge -- pun unintended; it means that the arrest should never have happened, and the arrest is struck from the legal record so it won't give the person difficulty getting visas etc.)

      He's still in trouble for acting like a dick when he was arrested, though.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    17. Re:Tax dollars at work. by fgouget · · Score: 5, Informative

      So assuming he fully-charged his iPhone 6 Plus, 11.1WH * 0.61 * 0.15/1000 = 0.00101565, he would have used 0.1 UK cents worth of electricity.

      I think your calculation is wrong. The charging efficiency normally specifies the fraction of the consumed energy that actually ends up being stored in the battery. So your calculation should be 11.1WH / 0.61 * 0.15/1000 = 0.00272950 so almost 0.3 pennies. Still not enough to make it worth charging him (though I don't know what the capacity or charging efficiency is in his case ;-).

    18. Re:Tax dollars at work. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If an outlet is exposed in a public place, assuming it's fair game seems reasonable to me.

    19. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quite frankly if a train provides an outlet, then unless cleary marked otherwise (which the article says was the case),
      yes I do expect the outlet to be available for public use

      that's certainly true in both Belgian, Dutch and German trains

    20. Re:Tax dollars at work. by TarpaKungs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing to do with the company. It was a trumped up plastic "policewoman" who got all bent out of shape.

      The worst the train guard would likely do (if that train even has a guard, many are Driver Only Operation) is suggest you unplug is as the supply might be dirty and risk damaging your equipment - or perhaps, in the worst case, that your lead is a trip hazard.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    21. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using the power of math and pulling some numbers out of my Keister I get at most 2 watt-hours worth of electricity.

      In Brit money that's worth probably around 1.6X10-4

    22. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or let's not. Shall we re-spin the story?

      "A man was confronted by a Community Support Officer about using a plug socket marked "For cleaners only, not for public use" on a London Overground Train. She explained that this is dangerous and asked him to remove it, after he refused she sought help from police officers who arrested him for abstracting electricity, He was then also arrested for his aggressive behaviour. He was subsequently de-arrested and no charges were made".

      Seems like a cheap and efficient way of dealing of an aggressive dick.

    23. Re:Tax dollars at work. by jbrown.za · · Score: 1

      I know the overzealous community support officer made this about "abstracting electricity", but let's not get sidetracked by that, because it's not about the cost ...

      As the article mentions, the socket is for use by cleaners when the train is in the station. While it is on the move it can switch from one substation to another. When this happens the feed could change phase and there could be a surge, which could damage anything that is plugged in.

      The bottom line is that there is a valid reason the sockets should not be used.

    24. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theft of 5 cents is not grounds for arrest really. Anyways elsewhere phone charging is OK on trains.

    25. Re:Tax dollars at work. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I think a more acceptable course of action would have been to tell the man to unplug his phone and only arrest him if he refuses to do so.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    26. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you also think ebook readers NEED to be turned off during takeoff and landing, cos they could totally produce an EM spike that could fry the airplanes engines, or some shit?

    27. Re:Tax dollars at work. by squizzar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or the guard would call the British Transport Police... especially as the bloke was clearly being a wanker about being asked not to do something that he was clearly instructed not to do by the signs on the train - hence his second arrest for the crime of essentially being a twat towards the police. These are British police, not American - whilst they can be just as jumped up and over-aggressive, in general if you are polite and reasonable they will treat you in an equally polite and reasonable way.

      Remember that police in England and Wales are not routinely armed (neither is the populace for the most part - the police in Scotland are trying to be an exception although no-one except the Scottish police and some politicians are particularly happy about it, and Northern Ireland which has some slightly different policing requirements to the rest of the UK) so there's a bit more emphasis on reason in confrontation. I've seen quite a few rowdy people of an evening say some pretty unreasonable and frequently unprovoked things to police officers, and in some cases actually assault them, be asked and then told not to continue doing so, be warned they risk arrest if they continue, and finally get arrested and act all surprised that they finally pushed the officer enough to do so. To any reasonable outside observer these people are actively trying to get themselves in trouble, and then get upset that they've succeeded.

      That's not to say I haven't met (once or twice) an unreasonable police officer, but despite that I've never been arrested or charged or seriously inconvenienced - probably because I don't instantly insult them. I've found they're quite useful when a gang of ne'er-do-wells is kicking your head in though...

    28. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone charging sockets are found on several UK trains - but the main AC distribution on a train could at times be very 'lumpy' and really could damage your device.

    29. Re: Tax dollars at work. by squizzar · · Score: 1

      It's not 5-cents. It's the UK and those trains with sockets for charging phones and laptops have signs above the sockets saying "mobile phones and laptops only" as opposed to "not for public use".

    30. Re:Tax dollars at work. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Forgot about the miniscule amount of energy for a minute. Would it be ok to run an extension cord from an outlet on your porch to power my fan when I get overheated riding my bike near your house?

      Yes, that would be fine with me.

      My home has several outlets outside, if someone needed to use one for 20 min to charge their phone or run a fan, I couldn't care less.

      A knock on the door to ask would be nice, but if I'm not home, I don't care.

      The amount of power is trivial and not worth caring about.

      There is a principle involved here.

      Perhaps, but there is also what is reasonable and polite society to consider.

      We're not Vulcan, we're human, and being considerate to each other is a good thing.

    31. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While it is on the move it can switch from one substation to another. When this happens the feed could change phase and there could be a surge, which could damage anything that is plugged in.

      Sound a lot like a "We have put a 'do not use' sign here to protect us from liability when you destroy your toys", nothing to raise a fuzz over.
      If that were the issue then the correct way to deal with it is to let him charge his phone and when it gets destroyed and he complains, tell him to sod off.

    32. Re:Tax dollars at work. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      Interesting: they pick you up on a silly charge and let you go, but they can still do you for being upset about that? Depends a bit on how upset the guy was of course, but still... Oh well, it seems to work like that in most places in the world. Over here they'll invariably ask you for your ID, which you are obliged to carry but many people don't, so they get to slap on an extra fine.
      In any case he is lucky he wasn't asked to "help the police with their inquiries", i.e. locked in a room and beaten with a rubber hose. Gotta love British euphemisms.

      simply releasing him without charge

      You're going straight to hell for that one... ;)

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    33. Re:Tax dollars at work. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      the police man was just enforcing the laws written by the legislature.

      The police have the ability in most cases to be selective in what they enforce, understanding that situations require judgement and society doesn't want an oppressive police force.

      Such as getting a warning for a speeding infraction, rather than a ticket.

      If you have police that selectively enforce the law you will have the problem of selective enforcement.

      We already have that, and so long as it isn't based on the person (age, gender, color, creed, etc.), then it is a good thing.

    34. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's still in trouble for acting like a dick when he was arrested, though.

      That is a bit odd. The de-arrestation pretty much is an admittance that he shouldn't have been arrested.
      It should not come as a surprise that people act like dicks if they get wrongfully arrested.
      The only thing that doesn't make it OK to use violence is that the men that are trying to take away your freedom is wearing uniforms.

      It's like arresting someone for resisting arrest without having an original reason to arrest that person.

    35. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to Canada, often public parking lots give electricity away to keep your car engines warm :)
      And on the "there is a principle involved here", people like you want a law for every common sense thing. If there's a seat on public transit, do you sit on it? Does that mean you sit on your neighbors porch.

    36. Re:Tax dollars at work. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Why are people banned by law from doing things at their own risk?

    37. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not about electricity. It is about the man getting aggressive to a PCSO who was in fact correct about not using the carriage power socket. There was a possibility of his iphone getting a very high power surge and set the carriage on fire. Thankfully he wasn't shot as would have been - you know where.

    38. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why are people banned by law from doing things at their own risk?

      I have no doubt that if this bloke had somehow fried his iphone by using the electricity socket he would have been suing the train company for not putting a big enough "not for use by the public" sticker on it.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    39. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know, someone will say but that is private property and this is government property

      The rail infrastructure in the UK is privatised. This is a plug socket provided by a company for their own use only (an clearly labelled as such) and paid for by that company. No government involved.

    40. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It's like arresting someone for resisting arrest without having an original reason to arrest that person.

      If you're stupid enough to assault a police officer, do you really think you should get away with it because the original arrest was a mistake?

      If I think you have insulted me and I respond by stabbing you through the eye with a kebab skewer, it's irrelevant whether I misheard your remark in the first place and you were just asking me to pass the ketchup.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    41. Re:Tax dollars at work. by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      Don't see any reason to believe that the train operator was even aware of this. The person who initially complained was a PCSO.

    42. Re:Tax dollars at work. by slugstone · · Score: 0, Informative

      If you do not want the pubic to use the outlet, then make it not usable by the public.

    43. Re:Tax dollars at work. by daedalus2097 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that TFL probably pay far less for their electricity than the average consumer, given the bulk discount they must get for powering an entire city's rail network.

    44. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, invariably they put others at risk and often enough, kill them unintentionally in a manner similar to but quite unlike making a cup of tea.
      Being stupid isn't against the law. Maybe we could get it passed as a temporary measure, like the patriot act?
      SMOKING IS NOT A CHOICE!
      ABORTION IS NOT A CHOICE.
      WAR IS PEACE.
      Live free or die. It's a good thing I'm not running the show over in merry old England. Come to think of it, I have a hard time controlling my desk. If you think I'm being petty, then you have never been frustrated by co-workers complaining about using their cd trays as a toaster oven.

    45. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 cents? how fucking power hungry is the iPhone? A full charge would top out at 1 cent maximum. Unless you're paying some astronomic per kWh price.

    46. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      True, here in the united states the cop would empty his gun into you for using a unauthorized outlet.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    47. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fuck that. They are paying customers. Let them charge their phones.

    48. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these things is not like the other, but both of them are bullshit.
      I conclude you must be full of shit.

    49. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand. The problem was not the man misusing a power outlet. The problem was, and is, that he was challenging Authority. Authority that allows itself to be challenged with impunity is not Authority. A lesson had to be taught, otherwise some plebe might even dare not to look downward and humbled when a Lord passes by.

    50. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      My home has several outlets outside, if someone needed to use one for 20 min to charge their phone or run a fan, I couldn't care less.

      Now imagine your outlets are in a room filled with 500 people all day long. Still willing to let passers-by plug in?

      My guess is, no, and that you would turn off those circuits to prevent 60 W * 200 people * 8 hours...call it 100 kWh/day loss. And that's what the rail company should do. If they don't mean for their outlets to be used by passengers, then they should not energize them. Give cleaning crews or the engineer keys to the breaker box, and only energize the outlets when they're needed. Signage and verbal warning maybe a second best. Signage and arrest? ridiculous.

    51. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 cents of electricity? That's about 500 watt hours. He must have ben charging his phone for about 4 days straight to run up that kind of cost.

    52. Re:Tax dollars at work. by jandersen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yup. Let's spend thousands of dollars worth of man-hours and paperwork and court time over 10 cents worth of electricity.

      RTFA - this is not about something trivial as that; this guys was ABSTRACTING electricity!! Fortunately they got him before he got to the extended metaphors; a close call. Too damn close for comfort!

    53. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that something has value in every currency in the world, and that it is still "10 cents worth of electricity" regardless of what local currency is used, so your comment is pedantic assholism.

    54. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Abstracting Electricity? The vocab is a bit advanced for a PCSO most of whom haven't mastered the grunt yet!

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    55. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      We likely don't know the full story here. I suspect it could have gone like this:

      * Someone has their phone plugged into a socket labeled 'Not for public use'.
      * PCSO notices, says "SIr, can you unplug your phone, that socket isn't for public use".
      * Man gets belligerent and argues with the PCSO and refuses to unplug.

    56. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You have a 60 watt phone charger?

      You can plug 200 chargers into one outlet? That must be a big power strip you carry around with you.

    57. Re:Tax dollars at work. by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Ok, then where would this woman rank on your scale?

      --
      I come here for the love
    58. Re:Tax dollars at work. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Screw that, lets boycott the UK over such arcane use of the English language as "Abstracting Electricity". Fucking call it stealing like any normal person and move on from there. Then realize the amount "stolen" is so insignificant as to only be discussable as an abstract concept, and fuck off entirely.

      Or better, yet, realize that anyone in the station is a paying customer, and good customer service says you don't make a scene over a few pennies, and make an ass of yourself and your employer over it.

      The actual transit officials seem much more reasonable as they point out that the system may not be safe for use with these devices.

      Honestly we need only come back to the US and look at airports to see why people with police powers make terrible security. Airport security was at exactly the level it needed to be back before the TSA existed, it was very lax, and pretty polite. Police powers and independent authority from the customer service business end really fucked the whole thing up.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    59. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and local trains in the usa have power for passenger use at no charge.

    60. Re:Tax dollars at work. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      No. Explicit permission is not required.

      Often it is clearly implied. This is one of those cases.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    61. Re:Tax dollars at work. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Cents/Pence, it's still 1/100th of the parent unit.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    62. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not to say I haven't met (once or twice) an unreasonable police officer, but despite that I've never been arrested or charged or seriously inconvenienced - probably because I don't instantly insult them. I've found they're quite useful when a gang of ne'er-do-wells is kicking your head in though...

      Understand that in the US the "ne'er-do-wells" kicking someone's head in are likely to BE the police. Bunch of thugs on a power trip. Biggest and most dangerous criminal organization in the US is the fraternal brotherhood of police.

    63. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't mean for their outlets to be used by passengers, then they should not energize them. Give cleaning crews or the engineer keys to the breaker box, and only energize the outlets when they're needed. Signage and verbal warning maybe a second best. Signage and arrest? ridiculous.

      The actual best option is just to give up on the stupid idea that they aren't available to the public. If they are that concerned about it, raise ticket prices by a penny to compensate.

    64. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apparently, he was arrested for stealing electricity, then "de-arrested." It sounds like cooler heads were going to prevail and just let the guy off with a warning. However, then he became aggressive and he was arrested again. You can't act belligerent towards police officers and then complain that they arrested you.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    65. Re:Tax dollars at work. by houghi · · Score: 1

      So what is the limit at which to which point I can steal?

      If it thousands of dollars, that means at least 2000USD. SO everything below that is a waste of money? Where do you live? I am sure I could steal something worth below 2000USD and I am sure you do not let the police come, because it is a waste of money, right?

      I can also see how this was going down:
      Please stop taking the electricity.
      No!
      Please stop, or we arrest you.
      No!

      So yes, he should be arrested. And no, I do not care about the amount. I care about the principal. That is, in the end, much easier, because it is clear where the line is.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    66. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I had more or less assumed that was standard practice. Like at airports: if you can find a socket, and you're not blocking traffic or causing a hazard (cord tripping) then go for it just like everyone else.

    67. Re:Tax dollars at work. by wootcat · · Score: 1

      Not even. It costs around 50 cents a year to charge an iPhone. We are talking about tenths of a penny.

      --
      I'm really a low 5-digit Slashdotter, but this ID is where I am now.
    68. Re:Tax dollars at work. by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      There is no way they will let cleaners loose with a carriage key and authorisation to fiddle with random breakers in random cupboards. They'd probably hit the wrong one and isolate the pantograph gear or various critical systems, resulting in the next driver spending 20 minutes wandering up and down the train trying to figure out why he's got a warning light on or something doesn't work.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    69. Re:Tax dollars at work. by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      Not completely - Network Rail is a private company wholly owned by the state. So was East Coast (trains) until March 2015.

      Our privatisation has been such a model of success that half of it went bankrupt and had to be taken over by the state (again).

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    70. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there some sort of law saying electrical outlet are fair game for all.

      Yes

    71. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2

      We're not Vulcan, we're human, and being considerate to each other is a good thing.

      Spoken like a 24 carat nerd...

    72. Re:Tax dollars at work. by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      Not being a twat is usually helpful in getting out of trouble - but the PSCO was being such a complete and utter moron that I can see why he got upset.

      The correct approach, if you wish to resist, is to tell the PCSO that you will cooperate with a real policeman only and challenge her to call the real BTP. Well, he got that far.

      The next trick is, despite her being an utter moron, is he should be unfailingly polite to both her and the real BTP whilst disobeying her.

      I've known people to do this when they are in the right (but a PSCO has jumped on them) and it usually results in the BTP apologising or at least taking no further action.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    73. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what law? you mean I can put up a random sign in a public space and cops in the UK will just start enforcing it?

    74. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "You do realize it's a private company doing the freaking out"

      So does a private company even have legal arrest powers? The American equivalent would be being sent to mall jail.

    75. Re:Tax dollars at work. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      US $0.10 worth of electricity is approximately 1.5 Kilowatt hours; the Electricity used to charge an iPhone is at maximum approximately 10 Watt-Hours, assuming he left the phone charging for an hour. In other words, about US $0.0006 worth of electricity.

    76. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sosume · · Score: 2

      It amazes me how you can be arrested in the UK just for not being polite. I mean, a judge should have objected to that long ago as it goes against freedom of expression.

    77. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK that would be about 6 pence. In reality, it was probably about 1/10 of that. In any case, if they don't want people using available outlets, why not either disable, block, or remove them? Oh, they probably need them so maintenance/cleaning people can plug in their vacuum cleaners. If so, was there a sign on the outlet stating that it was for "official" use only?

    78. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over here they'll invariably ask you for your ID, which you are obliged to carry

      Where is "here"? I need to add it to my list of places to never visit.

    79. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling a penny a "UK cent" is an understandable slip, but your use of decimals and units seems to be spot on. Have you consider Verizon customer "care" as a career path?

      I beg do differ you uninformed clod. Cent is derived from the latin 'centum' meaning a hundred and is commonly used to describe a coin that is worth a 1/100th of a basic monetary unit. Contrary to popular opinion the concept of a cent is currency agnostic, it was not created specifically for the US currency system. Since a UK penny is 1/100th of the UK basic monetary unit the Pound, he is technically correct. A penny can indeed be described as a 'UK cent'.

    80. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The private sector is infallible, and if you suggest otherwise you get called a lib.

      Private businesses can and do fail when they don't make consumers happy. That's why we like free markets. The consumer is king. Compare that with public services where if you just don't like it, wait a couple of years for another election and your only choices will be the current douche or a new turd sandwich.

    81. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only if you were doing while black.

    82. Re:Tax dollars at work. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      That's the funny thing about words. They can have different meanings! In this case, abstracting electricity means removing/stealing electricity and is actually worded that way in the law books in the UK.

    83. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Molt · · Score: 1

      I doubt the charger or phone will have been tested with the type of erratic currents this could produce and could well catch fire. The policewoman does seem have been an idiot about it but on the whole I'd rather the train I was travelling on to not be on fire.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    84. Re:Tax dollars at work. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      How dare the police use the actual name of the crime that was being accused.

    85. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pulling electricity from your house to mine is different than a paying customer using an outlet.

      I haven't hesitated using electrical outlets at restaurants, air-ports, gas-stations, etc before because, as a paying customer, I figure the company would rather have me as a happy returning customer in the rare case I need 10c of electricity (or 10 knuts or whatever you crazy blokes call it over there while smoking your fags)

      How much ill-will has been caused over such a minuscule amount of electricity?

      It's the same reason a restaurant ill comp my meal - in full at times - when they bugger something up. It's better for them in the long run to swallow a few dollars now and keep my patronage - and good word of mouth.

    86. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being unlawfully arrested will cause some people to become irate.

    87. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If an outlet is exposed in a public place, assuming it's fair game seems reasonable to me.

      What if it's labeled "not fair game," as this one effectively was?

    88. Re:Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      It doesn't stop being 10 cents' worth when it's charged in another currency.

    89. Re:Tax dollars at work. by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      Drachmas?

      .

    90. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      If you do not want the pubic to use the outlet, then make it not usable by the public.

      Good point. Simply labeling it "not for public use" is far too civil. What were they thinking?

    91. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tomxor · · Score: 1

      Yes... except there aren't 1000 pennies in a pound.

    92. Re:Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      If mostly phone chargers, it's most likely 5W and you're talking about 8kWh - which is maybe $1/day.

    93. Re:Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1
    94. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't met any PCSO's most of them struggle with basic grama

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    95. Re:Tax dollars at work. by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Arcane? I was thinking along the lines of archaic. I was shaking my head and reaching for a dictionary to look up whether "abstracting" had any definitions even remotely related to "stealing" but, sure enough, there is one. It's number 13 in my Random House Unabridged Dictionary, though. Working that into the wording of an ordinance was the work of a dedicated bureaucrat with way too much time on their hands.

      I'm right there with you on what transferring police power to uneducated bozos has done to airports. I used to like to fly -- well, "tolerated" is probably more accurate; I liked the flying part but never really liked the experience of dealing with airports -- but the complete and maddening waste of time that airport security has turned into makes me think twice (or more) about traveling anywhere that I can't reach by car.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    96. Re:Tax dollars at work. by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      It wasn't even 10 cents worth, if he charged it for an hour it would be a fraction of a penny. Next up, arrests for abstracting power from lights with your solar powered calculator,

    97. Re:Tax dollars at work. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It might be 3 pennies in the course of a year of keeping one phone charged.

    98. Re:Tax dollars at work. by byornski · · Score: 1

      Note that this was not a police officer but a support staff member so they do not have all the training that would normally be given. Mitchel and Webb did a sketch on it. They also do not have the power to arrest somebody more than an average person would ala Citizen's Arrest.

    99. Re: Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You're right - it's far less than 5 cents' worth, regardless of which currency it's actually billed in.

    100. Re:Tax dollars at work. by schlachter · · Score: 1

      so fraught with holes...
      1. why are their outlets on the train if they are not to be used?
      2. much increased safety results from a charged cell phone (i.e. ability to call the police (or help), ironically)

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    101. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how did that rent-a-cop get away with going full dick-move on this person. Anyone in that situation would be pissed off and rightfully so.
      They should have arrested the rent-a-cop for movement with intent to dick-over a citizen.

    102. Re:Tax dollars at work. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      The Netherlands. The rule was introduced a few years ago because "terrorists". And to make it easier to identify people getting stopped or arrested (but before the new rule, the police already had that power: no ID=get taken to the station, if they doubted you are who you say you are). The rule hasn't generated any additional security or even convenience for the police, but of course they'll never consider repealing that rule.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    103. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is pretty easy to know that in the UK, it is not called a penny, but also not know the actual term for it.

      So, UK cent seems totally reasonable to use in place of "pence" if you didn't know about the word "pence"

      Besides, it seems like that guy was just excited about the math.

    104. Re:Tax dollars at work. by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and there's a big gap between what's ok, and what's worth arresting someone over, costing the public tens of thousands of dollars.

      I don't think anyone is arguing that they guy should be entitled to charge his phone on the train (although he should)...but that the response to this was absurd.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    105. Re:Tax dollars at work. by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Especially if your pants were hanging around your knees, got belligerent with the cop, made threatening remarks and charged the officer.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    106. Re:Tax dollars at work. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      No, but the fact that an iPhone can't withstand ~1 kWh of electricity kind of does. So make that something like 0.05 cents or whatever.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    107. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't understand how police work, and are a victim of the narratives they craft. The police knew the original crime wouldn't stick, so they invented a "contempt of cop" charge so that the system can still harass this man event though he committed no crime. FTFY

    108. Re:Tax dollars at work. by schlachter · · Score: 1

      this is crazy.

      i'm gonna punch you in the face.

      but later i'll declare that i shouldn't have punched you in the face.

      but you'll still have to do time for that shove you gave me after i punched you.

      naturally...

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    109. Re:Tax dollars at work. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      And you do realize that this extra power consumption is less then the measurement error for the vehicle, so the same applies to your comment - it's essentially unbillable anyway.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    110. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #ChargingWhileBlack

      (Applies to both @MichaelBrown and people charging their phones)

    111. Re:Tax dollars at work. by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      What you are missing is that this shouldn't be an arrestable offense.

      Your construed example involves trespassing and you also seem to be confusing public places with government property.

    112. Re:Tax dollars at work. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tinkering with my electricity involves coming onto my property and hooking up to my shit. My property is not for public use, so approaching and standing near the power socket is trespassing; I don't want people hanging around my yard, peeking into all my shit, tromping my gardens, etc.

      Tinkering with the electricity in a public space involves little more than being somewhere you're expected to be. All these people will be in the mall, on a train, or whatnot; the only nitpick is that they plug in to the socket. We've now moved from "I don't want people using my electricity because I don't want them flocking like birds on my porch and in my back yard" to "I don't want people using my electricity because I don't like it." The cost to charge smart phones is almost zero; if one million people charged their smart phones every day, the cost would be $10,000*. The cost of labeling, monitoring, and enforcement is higher, so this is a risk you accept, avoiding all other risks (costs of enforcement, bad PR, etc.) or converting it to an opportunity (good PR).

      * Charging an iPhone 6 costs 47 cents per year. You might get 10% charge from one particular casual source--the Starbucks or train outlet--and even then, 5 out of 7 days per year. That's about 3 cents per year per person.

      does that mean i can walk into a government building and grab some paper or just start using the photocopiers?

      The cost of photocopies and copy paper is, of course, higher. Likewise, the expectation of people crowding around the copiers is lower, and drawing crowds by providing public copying may impede regular business. You can, in fact, walk into a government building and drink from the public water fountain, use the toilet, and so forth; the cost for the water is, again, low, compared to the cost of people showing up to snag a $5 ream of printer paper (charging an iPhone 6 costs 47 cents per year on average; water costs $1.50 per 1000 gallons, or 0.225 cents per toilet flush).

      This is why pens are, typically, only considered property to merchants selling pens: people will walk out of your business with one of your pens all the god damn time, and it's cheapest to just keep a hundred Bic pens on the desk and not worry about it. Many businesses have their business name and trade printed on their pens so the lost supply becomes free advertising (converting a risk--casual loss of pens--to an opportunity). Other businesses--particularly banks--chain the pen to their desk (if you haven't seen this, I'm being absolutely serious).

    113. Re:Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Sure, the iPhone can withstand 1kWh of electricity...eventually. It would take quite a few charges to get there.

    114. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Resisting arrest" is not the same as "assault a police officer". If someone does the latter, you'll see them charged with the latter.
      In the US, it's sadly not uncommon to see people charged with *literally* nothing *but* 'resisting arrest'. No charge to justify the arrest being resisted. What it means is the cop got upset because someone wasn't being polite, and decided to arrest them (illegally) for it, at which the person continued to be impolite (to the point of :gasp!: not actively assisting the cop in the arrest process).

    115. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then there should have been a locked cover on that outlet.

    116. Re:Tax dollars at work. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      especially as the bloke was clearly being a wanker

      Was he?

    117. Re:Tax dollars at work. by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Yes... except there aren't 1000 pennies in a pound.

      But there are a 1000Wh in a kWh, hence the division by a thousand.

    118. Re:Tax dollars at work. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Even when there is a sign next to it which states "Not fair game"?

    119. Re:Tax dollars at work. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Would you also be fine if the people using your outlet plugged in devices which could cause problems such as fires? The outlet in question looks like a regular outlet, but the power it supplies fluctuates wildly as the train passes between sections of track powered by different substations. There is a reason it's not supposed to be used by the public...

    120. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a moment, let's disregard the vanishingly small amount of electricity 'abstracted'. Let's look at a different question.

      What if he had plugged his charger into the clearly marked "Not for public use" socket and it was destroyed by a voltage spike, for instance.
      Possibly also the phone as well.

      Given his obstreperous nature, do you think for a moment that he wouldn't have sued over not only the loss of his device but also the "potential loss" of productivity?

    121. Re:Tax dollars at work. by dave420 · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. They are for the cleaners, hence the sign
      2. There are emergency phones & alarms for contacting help, which are preferred as they allow for easier relaying of location, and always work (unlike spotty cellphone reception)

    122. Re:Tax dollars at work. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Electricity doesn't work that way. If it's a standard outlet at standard voltage, it has to operate within standard specifications or else there will be NEC problems. Further, the outlet will be useless if it doesn't--for all purposes, including the purpose for which it was installed.

    123. Re:Tax dollars at work. by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Not any different, as this would require that 100% of the people on the trains are fully literate in English.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    124. Re:Tax dollars at work. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      If it thousands of dollars, that means at least 2000USD.

      "Thousands" could mean 1.2 thousands, or 0.3 thousands.

      So what is the limit at which to which point I can steal?

      The point at which you have legal standing. Below a certain threshold, the courts find that no sentencing is appropriate, and actually throw the case out as a waste of court time.

    125. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you think the big corporation is so evil that they begrudge this poor guy 3 pennies worth of power to charge his phone and that's what this is really about?

    126. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know this is the internet, right? You can use hyperlinks. In fact, you are encouraged to do so.

    127. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      there are rules and laws for a reason

      ..and there is a reason that there are two different words.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    128. Re:Tax dollars at work. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Changing phase does nothing with an electronic charging circuit of the type used. A surge cannot be created in this fashion.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    129. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      If you did that, I MIGHT pull the plug and tell you you can't use it (only if it was a frequent problem), but I certainly wouldn't call the cops. That's even including that you wouldn't normally be entitled to consider my porch a public space.

      Perhaps a better analogy would be if your guest plugged in without asking. Would you really call the cops on someone you invited to be on your porch if he plugged a phone in? Or for a perhaps even more apt comparison, if you had a business office and someone was there for a meeting with you, would you call the cops if he plugged his phone in?

    130. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      In that case, I would likely just explain that and then say you can't use that outlet (if you still wanted to after being told it would spike your phone).

    131. Re:Tax dollars at work. by davstok · · Score: 1

      Completely lacking in insight, in fact.
      If all travellers with mobile phones thought it was ok to steal electricity in this way it would come to quite a large sum.
      At the end of the day everyone would have to pay with increased fares.
      Therefore it's necessary to show that this small delict actually has significant social costs.

    132. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A principle I tell you, it's about the principle! Are you trolling? Seriously?

      He did not run an extension cord from someone's porch to another person's yard. He did not starting using photocopiers.
      He was on a train and plugged his phone into an available socket to charge it up.
      They actually tried to arrest him for this action!

      Just to play your game here, the actual closest analogy was that he was in a hotel room he had paid for, saw an outlet on the wall that said housekeeping only and decide to quickly charge his phone with it since there were no other outlets available. The hotel then called the cops to have him ARRESTED for 'abstracting electricity', seriously what is that anyway, while staying in their hotel.

      At most he should have been billed extra for the electrical use. To actually arrest him for this trivial issue is absurd and if anyone should be arrested it should be the person who came up with the stupid idea for being a public nuisance.

    133. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      8kWh? Where'd you get that? Even if you left the 5W phone charger plugged in all day long (24h), that's only 120 Watt-hours. Here in the US, that's about 2 cents' worth of electricity. And that's not even normal usage: a phone only draws 5W when charging (it's probably more like 6W at the outlet, because of inefficiency in the charger itself); a normal phone can be fully charged in an hour or two, and after that goes into trickle-charge mode where it draws very little power from the charger. So you're really look at less than a half-cent worth of electricity.

    134. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Kkloe · · Score: 1

      yes its true that rules are not laws, but breaking some rules might get you charged for breaking some law, as it is depending on the rules of whom you break and how they take it

    135. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      It could be argued that since even the police agree that he should never have been arrested, he was quite right to get bent out of shape about his initial arrest.

    136. Re:Tax dollars at work. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it would take about a half of the phone's lifetime. So a charge or two will get utterly lost in the VAT alone.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    137. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Other businesses--particularly banks--chain the pen to their desk (if you haven't seen this, I'm being absolutely serious).

      My bank doesn't do this: it has a huge supply of free pens with their name and logo on them at the desk where you stop to fill out your deposit ticket, and they encourage people to take them. Free advertising is worth a lot more (to a local place like a bank) than worrying about the cost of some $0.10 pens.

    138. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Comparing to the US makes no sense; everyone knows US cops are the worst in the world. That's like comparing the UK to Somalia in economic power or something. Being better than the country that's the worst in the world isn't anything to be proud of.

    139. Re:Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Because you didn't read. I was responding to a scenario where 500 people are all charging their phones. Multiply your figures by 500 and you'll get what I'm saying.

    140. Re:Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's something for a young phone to aspire to.

    141. Re:Tax dollars at work. by towermac · · Score: 1

      I think he got that from the 500 person example given.

    142. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot a couple calculations.

      There are 8 million people in UK. Let's say 2 million of those are bus riders with iThings (i things have shit batteries apparently - every charging station I see where I am seem to only have ithings plugged in, with a rare exception of other phones) Rest assured, the people who buy these phones have a very, very pack-rat mentality (they'll buy all the fashionable clothes, Starbucks, even if they can't really afford it) and they'll follow suit if they see someone doing it...

      Let's say each one has to charge once every other month.

      0.1 pence * 1 million * 6 months = 600,000 pounds / year

      Add in that they have to possibly assign someone to manage conflicts should more one or two iusers need to charge their phones, and add extra insurance in case someone gets electrocuted.

      650,000 pounds / year.

      A bit more than 0.1 pence, isn't it?

      Then again, I wouldn't expect an iuser like you to have a wider view of things...

    143. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      The train has only a few dozen plugs, so the notion that 500 people will use them at once is ridiculous. I know you *can* do the math, but that doesn't make it meaningful.

    144. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's not just phones. During the netbook era, the typical netbook charger drew about 30 watts. Chargers for full-size laptops probably draw even more.

    145. Re: Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Now imagine your outlets are in a room filled with 500 people all day long

      I didn't create the scenario. 500 charges does not mean that they are using it simulataneously. To compare it with the train scenario, that would be 30 outlets, in transient use across 24 hours of a day.

    146. Re:Tax dollars at work. by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Indeed:

      Electricity sockets on Overground trains are clearly marked with the words: “cleaners use only and not for public use”.

      On a forum dedicated to the London Underground, members have pointed out that plug sockets on the trains are for cleaning equipment deployed when trains are in depots. They recommend not charging electronic equipment as there is a risk of power surge: “If something was directly plugged into it (for example a standard computer, or a laptop without a battery in) the equipment would probably be damaged at any section gaps where the power supply changes from one substation to another!”

    147. Re: Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And I'll also add that there is more than one train in their system.

    148. Re:Tax dollars at work. by teasea · · Score: 1

      I like being called a lib.

    149. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Foremost, Slashdot has a primary liberal readership (+50%), judging by its more politically polarizing polls.

      Secondly, lets use a little common sense. Governments and companies are both run by people, which are fallible. The woman crying thief is at fault and the cops enforcing this silly claim are also at fault. I'll call you a lib because of the idiocy of your statements.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    150. Re:Tax dollars at work. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Why? Is it all that different from me tethering to your electric and using it for my own purposes? Is there some sort of law saying electrical outlet are fair game for all.

      Forgot about the miniscule amount of energy for a minute. Would it be ok to run an extension cord from an outlet on your porch to power my fan when I get overheated riding my bike near your house? I know, someone will say but that is private property and this is government property. I respond with does that mean i can walk into a government building and grab some paper or just start using the photocopiers?

      There is a principle involved here. Even if something needs changed to allow this conduct, it still needs changed to distinguish between it.

      It IS actually about the miniscule amount of electricity. The amount of taxpayer pounds that this WASTES is something like 100 metric ZILLIONS more than the "abstraction" involved.

      But here's a novel idea that I haven't read here yet: Install a separate, coin-operated outlet (10p for 30 mins, or somesuch), with a circuit-breaker to limit the current-draw to 1 Amp. That way, no one is tempted to run their hair dryer or recharge their electric car with it; but it has plenty of current for even a quickie laptop charge. This monetization scheme works for parking spaces (I assume that they have parking meters in the UK); so why not electrical outlets?

      Then, instead of ARRESTING someone for "abstracting" electricity from the non-metered outlet, you can "deputize" the train security personnel to hand-out "tickets" (I assume you have the concept of "illegal parking tickets" in the UK), with a fine that is appropriate to the crime (let's say 50 quid as a deterrent), instead of the ridiculous situation you have now.

    151. Re:Tax dollars at work. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      By forgetting about the cost you're intentionally avoiding the solution to your problem.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    152. Re:Tax dollars at work. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      My guess is, no, and that you would turn off those circuits to prevent 60 W * 200 people * 8 hours...call it 100 kWh/day loss.

      But that is a ridiculously unreasonable hypothetical.

      We're talking a cellphone (or even a laptop) that is going to draw about 100-200 mW (that's 0.1 - 0.2W) from the AC line at roughly 230VAC (that's what the UK line-voltage is, right?). That much power is lost (actually much more) in the resistance of the electrical wiring in each and every carriage.

    153. Re:Tax dollars at work. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The outlet in question looks like a regular outlet, but the power it supplies fluctuates wildly as the train passes between sections of track powered by different substations..

      Citation, please?

    154. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realize that to consume 10 cents of electricity, the charger would have been plugged for more than a week ?

    155. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, here in the united states the cop would empty his gun AT you for using a unauthorized outlet.

      There I fixed that, it not like cops can shoot ~15% hit rate.

    156. Re:Tax dollars at work. by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      If someone is inside of my house, and they are legally allowed to be there (i.e. I've invited them in), then I have zero problem with them using my outlets to charge their phone.

      If someone is on the train, and they are legally allowed to be there (i.e. they have a valid ticket), then I have zero problem with them using the train's outlets to charge their phone.

      If someone is in a government building, and they are legally allowed to be there, then I have zero problem with them using the building's outlets to charge their phone.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    157. Re:Tax dollars at work. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      ...which is why power outlets on most vehicles run through an isolator which draws power from a continuously-cycled DC source such as a bank of lead acid batteries. Couldn't get much cleaner than that.

      On the other hand, if a BS1363 socket (let's assume it's marked "for public use - laptops and phones only") outputs 1200V and fries equipment, the owner would have a claim for damages. BS1363 specifies 220-240VAC@30A line, 13A max per outlet.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    158. Re:Tax dollars at work. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      it actually is: section 13 Theft Act 1968.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    159. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Other businesses--particularly banks--chain the pen to their desk (if you haven't seen this, I'm being absolutely serious).

      My bank doesn't do this: it has a huge supply of free pens with their name and logo on them at the desk where you stop to fill out your deposit ticket, and they encourage people to take them. Free advertising is worth a lot more (to a local place like a bank) than worrying about the cost of some $0.10 pens.

      Mine doesn't, mostly because I think they came to the conclusion that making sure there is a pen at the desks for filling out paperwork before going up to the tellers was important--and people couldn't be relied upon to be polite enough to mention to the staff that they took the last pen. Given that people have gone to the trouble of stealing those tethered pens, I don't blame them...

      Honestly, if the plugs are dangerous to electronics to use while the car's in motion, a sign warning people of that or better yet locking safety covers are the correct measures. Otherwise, just have it as a courtesy phone-charging station, and if somebody hogs it the other passengers will probably handle the problem quite well.

    160. Re:Tax dollars at work. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      it gets worse. A police officer can't arrest you for no reason - he HAS to have lawful cause. You have not only the RIGHT but the OBLIGATION UNDER COMMON LAW to refuse to be unlawfully arrested. HOWEVER, the PO is covered there because he can THEN arrest you and immediately charge you with resisting arrest! You're fucked all ways from Sunday!

      One reason why I TURN MY BACK on police officers and I refuse to even acknowledge their presence. If they touch me, it's assault. If they persist, that is harassment. If they raise arms, shit gets real.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    161. Re:Tax dollars at work. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      And then he'd say something awesome like, "Consider this a blackout."

      But then people would hear "black" and think it was like a racial thing when really he was talking about a power outage, the common term for which is "a blackout." And then the protests and the investigations...ugh, police work is just so frustrating these days.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    162. Re:Tax dollars at work. by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      It is called a penny. Pence is the plural.

    163. Re:Tax dollars at work. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      Now imagine your outlets are in a room filled with 500 people all day long. Still willing to let passers-by plug in?

      If there are 500 people on my property every day, then I have a business of some sort, or I'm crazy wealthy.

      In both cases, I'm still fine with it. It is a trivial amount of power compared to whatever I'm doing with 500 people a day.

    164. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Interesting: they pick you up on a silly charge and let you go, but they can still do you for being upset about that? Depends a bit on how upset the guy was of course, but still...

      They're examples of the kinds of charges that normally are tacked on at the end of the list, meaning that you've got to be a special sort to get yourself arrested for just that.

      I am not a lawyer, but I listen to 'em: This is why you at least try to fake being a calm, reasonable human being who is willing to be cooperative so this gets sorted out faster, as it's a lot easier to make a bad arrest vanish from your records if they don't have you for perfectly valid Being A Twat charges.

    165. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize it doesn't matter right?

    166. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody would say anything if you took a drink from the water fountain next to it so why not

    167. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avg price per kWH is probably double what they pay for a commercial rate.

    168. Re: Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charging a 7000mAh ipad battery uses about 28 Watt Hours of energy.

      Accelerating a 100kg person to 100kph takes about 11 Watt Hours of energy.

      So if he went 3 stops and somehow managed to fully charge his iPad in that time then he would have doubled the energy usage he already caused just by stepping on the train.

      And I doubt the cost of the ticket includes much for energy usage......

    169. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are British police, not American - whilst they can be just as jumped up and over-aggressive, in general if you are polite and reasonable they will treat you in an equally polite and reasonable way.

      What makes you think American police act any differently in general?

    170. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      We're talking a cellphone (or even a laptop) that is going to draw about 100-200 mW (that's 0.1 - 0.2W) from the AC line at roughly 230VAC

      I have cellphone and tablet chargers that provide 2 amps at 5 volts. That's 10W. And cellphones and tablets that use that full current to charge faster. Assuming 90% efficiency in the charger, that's 11W at the AC side.

      My Dell laptop charger is rated at 3.34A at 19.5V, which is 65W.

      Your 200mW charger would provide less than 40 mA to charge your phone. You'll need to ride the train for a VERY long time for your phone to get any reasonable charge at that rate, and your laptop will actually be discharging while it is plugged in.

      The USB system has 500mA as the design spec. That's 2.5W minimum. No, nobody is talking about a charger that would use just 200 mW.

      The issue is not how much electricity it uses. There are two major issues.

      1. Liability. Rail company allows people to plug in. Surges and brownouts in power as the train crosses power boundaries cause damage to an $800 cellphone. Who pays for that? And the lawyers when the passenger sues.

      2. Wear and tear. Hundreds of people plugging and unplugging every day will create wear and tear, and increases maintenance costs. A broken or worn outlet can cause shorts, which can cause fires.

      The guy should have said "sorry" and unplugged instead of trying to make a point. The outlet was marked, he was in the wrong. The police should have pulled him from the train, discussed the matter with him long enough to make him late for wherever he was going to make THEIR point, and then sent him on his way.

      But turning it into disorderly, that's all on him.

    171. Re:Tax dollars at work. by EverythingsPermitted · · Score: 1

      Won't you be, oh please won't you be, won't you be my neighbor?

    172. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      In that case, I would likely just explain that and then say you can't use that outlet (if you still wanted to after being told it would spike your phone).

      Which is what happened here. The community service officer kept telling the guy that he wasn't allowed to use the outlet, which means she told him the first time and he kept doing it. And doing it, until the train reached the station. She then turned it over to the police on the platform.

      He should have said "ok, sorry", unplugged, and the matter would have ended. He wanted to make a point. So, the police made a point, too.

      It's just plain stupid to argue with a law enforcement official (even if she can't arrest you herself) about something that is plainly marked as not for public use, and which is technically illegal. When you force her to call for backup, you've just escalated the matter much further than it deserves to go and you are going to lose. Even if all the cops did was pull you from the train for a discussion, you've lost more time that it is worth.

    173. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you were black.

    174. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Imagine a 50 mile section of track all powered by one substation. Imagine the IR drop of running the power for all the trains on that track for an average of 25 miles. Imagine the changes in IR drop as the I changes as trains use more or less current to accelerate or come to a stop.

      If you don't want to imagine one long stretch of track all powered from one substation, then imagine that there are multiple substations and the train must switch from one to the next, and that the IR drop at the end of the one being left will be high (i.e. low voltage) and the voltage of the next will be higher until the train starts drawing current from it.

      Electric trains use power from those wires overhead and the tracks below (or sometimes a third rail). If you need a citation to understand why there might be huge fluctuations in voltage during travel, I'd suggest Halliday and Resnick for a review of the physics of electronics.

    175. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    176. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't act belligerent towards police officers and then complain that they arrested you.

      Um, yes you can. When you're accosted by a costume wearing leech like a PCSO (a fake cop whose job is akin to that of a dystopian civil enforcement officer) for doing something that is harming nobody, you have a perfect right to be indignant at your treatment. Laws that allow contempt of cop to be prosecuted need to be struck down with great prejudice. If he gets a jury trial I would argue for jury nullification.

    177. Re:Tax dollars at work. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Even when there is a sign next to it which states "Not fair game"?

      Heh. That would really baffle anyone in the 95% of the human population who's not a literate, native speaker of English. (Just imagine a tourist staring at their dictionary, trying to make sense of that set of three simple English words. ;-)

      Of course, it's not at all unusual for people to put up signs with this level of clarity, nearly anywhere in the world. There's a nice web site, engrish.com, that has a large collection of similar signage, mostly from east Asia, but also from most of the rest of the world.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    178. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If you did that, I MIGHT pull the plug and tell you you can't use it (only if it was a frequent problem),

      She told him he couldn't use it. She is probably not authorized to yank it out herself due to liability issues. ("You broke my charger when you pulled it out, buy me a new one...")

      but I certainly wouldn't call the cops.

      She IS the cops. She's not one that can arrest people, but she's part of the same system.

      Or for a perhaps even more apt comparison, if you had a business office and someone was there for a meeting with you, would you call the cops if he plugged his phone in?

      If the outlet was marked "not for public use", it was a crime to use it to start with, the cop caught him using it, and he refused to simply unplugged when instructed to do so, I MIGHT step in to try to defuse the situation if I cared about the guy.

      If he was just one of an endless number of customers and I wanted to make it clear that the outlet he was using was not for public use so I didn't have lots of people abusing it, I might not bother interfering with them.

      Given that this guy is a captive customer (whose train are you going to take except mine?), a tiny part of my revenue, and creating a problem, why should I interfere with police doing their job?

      Maintenance. Liability. Increased customer expectations ("you have some outlets for us to use, you should add more..."). Three issues his use of that outlet create for me.

    179. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sdguero · · Score: 1

      Where I live (San Diego, CA), base electricity rates start at $0.15 per kWh.

      The iPhone 6 (4.7" screen) has a 1,810 mAh 3.7 V battery in it.

      Assuming the man got a full charge from a completely dead battery...

      Wh = mAh × V / 1000
      1810 X 3.7 / 1000 = 6.697 Wh
      6.697 Wh / 1000 = .006697 kWh

      Let's assume the transformer is only 70% efficient, .006697 kWh / 0.7 = .009567 kWh

      And now lets convert this power to cash money at San Diego rates... .009567 kWh X 0.15 $/kWh = $0.0014

      Well that came out even lower than I anticipated! $0.10 seemed high, and I was thinking it was closer to a penny, but not such a small fraction of a penny.

      So assuming my math is right (big assumption!), it cost the train operator a fraction (7/50) of a penny.

    180. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sorry, your version is not supported by TFA. The fact that he was de-arrested for the "abstraction of electricity" says that the cops decided he never should have been arrested for that (that's what de-arresting is).

    181. Re:Tax dollars at work. by shadowknot · · Score: 1

      Or to reframe without the authority worship:

      We likely don't know the full story here. I suspect it could have gone like this:

      * Someone has their phone plugged into a socket labeled 'Not for public use'.
      * PCSO notices, says "Unplug the phone now or I'll call the real police on you because RULEZ!".
      * Man asks reasonable question of costumed imbecile thereby challenging the tiny bit of authority costumed thug believes they have.
      * Costumed tax leeches aggress against peaceful person who has harmed nobody
      * Man gets rightly indignant at baseless aggression
      * Higher paid costume wearers extort/kidnap for contempt of cop

    182. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      She was a community support officer (AKA "plastic plod" or "hobby bobby"). She didn't have to escalate to getting the actual cops to make an arrest. The actual cops with arrest power decided arrest was the wrong call once they got the full story.

      If you treat customers at a place of business that way, you will HAVE to be a monopoly to stay in business.

    183. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tibit · · Score: 1

      You meant 0.1 cents worth, perchance?

      You're overestimating the cost by 2 orders of magnitude.

      Assume we were to recharge an iPhone 5s from a flat battery. You're storing 5.3Whr at, conservatively, 50% overall efficiency. You'll be taking ~10Whr, or 0.01kWhr from the outlet. At 20p per kWh, we're talking 0.20p, or 0.3 US cents. At industrial rates, it'll be less than half that.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    184. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so almost 0.3 pennies.

      0.3 penny. Singular. You don't eat .3 burgers. You don't drive 30% to works.

      0.3 pennies is reminiscent to the AT&T roaming charge debacle where the phone support people kept saying ".03 cents" which mathematically is "$0.0003" but they were mislabeling "$0.03".

    185. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is trouble with that logic though.

      Say I thought you slept with my sister.
      So I hit you.
      You hit me back.
      I then find out you didn't sleep with my sister.
      But I hit you again because you hit me.

      If I hadn't made the mistake in the first place, you wouldn't have hit me, and we'd still be buddies.

      -Rick

    186. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tibit · · Score: 1

      Take your strawman back. Please.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    187. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tibit · · Score: 1

      All U.S. banks I've been to do the same. Given how expensive marketing is in general, this seems like a fucking bargain.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    188. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tibit · · Score: 1

      These same people, were they to act like that in the U.S., would have had the shit beat out of them at the very least, and could easily sustain life-threatening injuries. I'd take English and Welsh cops any day, thanks.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    189. Re:Tax dollars at work. by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      Technically, 1/1000th of the unit.

    190. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      She was a community support officer (AKA "plastic plod" or "hobby bobby").

      She is a POLICE community support officer. That makes her a member of the police system.

      She didn't have to escalate to getting the actual cops to make an arrest.

      No, she didn't, but she chose to when her request to stop doing something illegal was refused. Cops tend to do that. If you continue to break the law after one of them asks you to stop, then you get what you want: an escalation of the confrontation. If a cop thinks what you're doing is important enough to actually ask you to stop, then you should be smart enough to know they think it is important enough for you to actually stop.

      The actual cops with arrest power decided arrest was the wrong call once they got the full story.

      She's not the one who arrested him, they were. They didn't have to arrest him, either, but they did, and then later changed their mind. But he's still charged with disorderly or whatever they call resisting over there.

      This has nothing to do with how a business owner treats customers, so your attempt at sidetracking the issue will be ignored.

    191. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      How was it implied? There was a sign saying cleaners only not for public use. It was implicitly denied if anything.

    192. Re:Tax dollars at work. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In software, all problems are solved with another layer of abstraction. Who knew abstracting could be bad?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    193. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Even the real cops call them "chimps".

      No, she didn't, but she chose to when her request to stop doing something illegal was refused.

      Can you quote me something from TFA that says she initially just asked him to unplug?

      They arrested the man on her say-so, but then decided she was wrong.

      This has nothing to do with how a business owner treats customers, so your attempt at sidetracking the issue will be ignored.

      I guess you didn't bother to read the post I was replying to which is where the discussion went from TFA to analogous situations. You know, the one where it was claimed that any individual would not be OK with it if THEIR power was being used.

      This is a text based forum. You have the ability to slow down and read carefully if you can't keep up. You should try it.

    194. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      "She kept saying it's a crime." It's in the damn summary. "Kept saying" == "more than once". "it's a crime", when spoken by a member of the police, is an instruction to stop. It doesn't matter if she "just" asked him to unplug, the request was made along with the information that he was committing a crime. He decided to push the issue and he got what he wanted.

      And "de-arresting" him doesn't mean what he did wasn't a crime, it only means they dropped the charge. Why should they keep the minor charge when he helped them by resisting?

      I guess you didn't bother to read the post I was replying to which is where the discussion went from TFA to analogous situations.

      I don't care what other specious analogies you've come up with, right here we're talking about the person who asked him to stop multiple times and he refused. She wasn't the business owner, she was a part of the police. The business owner didn't call her to come deal with this, she was on her regular rounds. The business owner has nothing to do with this.

      What "the real cops" call her is irrelevant, she's still a part of the system.

      This is a text based forum. You have the ability to slow down and read carefully if you can't keep up.

      You have the ability to stop resorting to personal insults. You should try it.

    195. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Mine doesn't, mostly because I think they came to the conclusion that making sure there is a pen at the desks for filling out paperwork before going up to the tellers was important--and people couldn't be relied upon to be polite enough to mention to the staff that they took the last pen.

      That doesn't seem to be a problem with my bank: they have probably 100 pens at the counter at all times, and they keep it stocked up. I'm sure it's part of the staff's duties to check on the pen bins and make sure no one's going to be hunting for a pen.

    196. Re:Tax dollars at work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      She kept saying, but that doesn't mean he kept doing.

      In the U.K. there is a difference between releasing without charges and de-arresting. The former just means it's probably not worth it, the latter means the arrest shouldn't have happened in the first place.

      Remember where I suggested read carefully? I did not introduce the analogy.

      Don't make me retract the part about you having the ability.

    197. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no the 1000 has nothing to do with it... look carefully at the result: 0.0027... how many pennies is that?

    198. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would solve the problem and ensure you never plug your iPhone into another unauthorized outlet. as a matter of fact that would also ensure your not a dick head to anybody ever again and probably mage every ones life better off . So I'm not really seeing the problem hear.

    199. Re:Tax dollars at work. by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      Well, this goes back a *lot* of years now so I have no problem posting the story online:

      Back when I was 17 I got charged with possession for being caught smoking a joint, and ended up going to court about 7 or 8 times for it. The reason it was so many times, is that the prosecutor kept asking for a "continuance" when my case came up, which I quickly learned was jargon for "just reschedule for later". Now, I was always a pretty smart kid, so in all those hours I sat there in court waiting for my name to be called, I made some interesting observations..

      One was how many people were being charged for minor shoplifting offences - seriously, I saw a lot of people being charged with stealing items that cost LESS THAN A DOLLAR. Small and big store owners alike seem to have zero tolerance when it comes to shoplifting, I guess. Lots of people trying to grab chocolate bars or whatever, but I wouldn't have been surprised to see a kid hauled up for eating a penny candy and running from the store without paying.

      I figure you probably need a court to deal with these problems - with the huge caveat they are sensible. If only to provide an objective judgment on what often are heated situations between victims, police, accused, etc. If you run it efficiently it's a part of the cost of justice we probably want to keep.

      If you want to know what happened to me, eventually prosecutor talked to judge and they offered to drop the charge in exchange for some number of community service hours, and this is how most of the cases were dealt with. At the time I was really pissed off at receiving any "punishment" at all (and perhaps still to some degree not thinking what I did should be illegal), but looking back they had the right idea. 95% of people moving through this court were not criminals, and the court can usually ascertain that pretty quickly. Just the experience is enough to scare those 95% into never reoffending, including possibility of charges, and if they do come back they rightfully start escalating repercussions. But they should still legalize pot ;-)

    200. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Please hold these bullets for me"

    201. Re:Tax dollars at work. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Reasonably, I would think that sockets that are not for use by the public in location otherwise freely accessible to anyone should be secured behind a locked panel.

    202. Re:Tax dollars at work. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're right. I was thinking mA, not mW. My bad. I thought something didn't look right when I was typing it.AndbImshoukd know better.

    203. Re:Tax dollars at work. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      All that sound reasonable; but the load being applied when the train crosses to the previously "unloaded" track should instantly pull-down the voltage on that track, and the inductance of the windings in the traction motors in the train should dampen any current surges. Otherwise, I can't believe that they could keep any incandescent lamps on the trains from blowing out basically all the time.

      Also, I would be surprised if the track sections were electrically-isolated from one another anyway; and if not, there shouldn't be any significant voltage perturbations from one track section to another. I would bet it is more like power distribution in the "grid": where distributed power plants are essentially phase-synchronized (and voltage-matched), with inductors and capacitors along the way to help with power-factor compensation.

      But if you are right, and there ARE big ol' dips and spikes, then that is even more reason why they should have the coin-op outlet that I mentioned in another post; because that outlet could have a hefty LRC filter and since this is Europe, likely a PFC to boot, thus doing enough "line conditioning" (especially since the currents are so low) that any AC adapter worth its salt would be just fine.

    204. Re:Tax dollars at work. by tomxor · · Score: 1

      I know there are a thousand Watts in a KiloWatt, the issue is with your interpretation of the result not the calculation... how many pennies is in 0.0027 GBP? hint it's the same as cents in a dollar.

    205. Re:Tax dollars at work. by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Amusing but false. A simple dictionary definition disproves your claim so I will need a reference from QI at the very least to believe otherwise.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    206. Re:Tax dollars at work. by v1 · · Score: 1

      Firstly, the USB spec covers current draw up to 2 amps, typically communicated/negotiated via voltage preset on the two data pins. (wikipedia's got a good writeup on it) But considering the power the train is requiring all by itself to operate, a single light bulb could easily be drawing double what any iPad does. The variance of bad bulbs on trains would be more noticeable than the occasional charging phone.

      There's already a sign up on these outlets saying "not for public use". If I were them I would add a little additional verbage, "use of this unregulated power outlet may cause damage to peripheral, train operatior is not responsible for damage caused by unlawful use" Lawyers would still maybe try to pick on it but wouldn't get much traction. There's alwayws that 1-in-a-million that pulls it off, but it's a statistical blip.

      Changing the outlet covers would be expensive. You'd also have to change the vacuums etc. I'm sure there are other things they use like work lights etc. Covering the outlets would probably be effective but would end up costing more in staff time than the $$ saved in electricity, by far.

      Placing the outlets on a switch would be hideously expensive. They tap into the common power rails, so new lines would have to be plumbed and a new breaker AND switch would have to be installed. No, you can't use the breaker. Breakers aren't meant for frequent use, you'd be replacing them once a year if you used them every day.

      The wear and tear on an outlet would be noticeable but not bad. The trains get taken down for scheduled maintenance regularly anyway, and that's already on their checklist. If they try to use the outlet and it's a bit off, it gets replaced. One $4 outlet every few years really doesn't affect them.

      It sounds like everyone involved overreacted to some degree or other, the train people, the citizen, and the police. The difference is only one of them could have severe direct consequences - the police. This places a higher onus on them to remain calm and rational, which they failed to do, which is confirmed by saner heads at the precinct prevailing and "de-arresting" him.

      I'd like to say more but I gotta get off to work. When I get there I will plug in my phone to charge. And I won't expect anyone to flip a biscuit over it.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    207. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI We normally refer to PCSOs as CHIMPS:
      Completely Hopeless In Most Policing Situations

    208. Re:Tax dollars at work. by fgouget · · Score: 1

      how many pennies is in 0.0027 GBP? hint it's the same as cents in a dollar.

      100 pennies in a GBP, so 0.0027 GBP * 100 pennies / GBP = 0.27 pennies or close to 0.3 pennies as I said all along. What's the problem then?

    209. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could you post in American ENglish and Not the Queen's English since 90% or more of the readers here cant follow almost the whole second line.

    210. Re:Tax dollars at work. by siliconsmiley · · Score: 1

      According to the actual article on the topic, "The artist was later “de-arrested” for the offence."

    211. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      :) ignorance of the rules is not always a defense for breaking them.

      you live in a country that provides public education in the english language, if you are illiterate it is kind of on you. if you're an immigrant, the implicit understanding is that you are literate enough to operate in the country.

    212. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      yeah, i think you're in the minority here.

    213. Re:Tax dollars at work. by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Which is placed there for the use of the passengers anyway! I and hundreds of other passengers I've seen have used these sockets, that is precisely why they are there!

    214. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      apparently there are signs that literally say "don't use"

    215. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was arrested being a douche. Obviously charging (I HAVE) an iPhone... Any other phone is fair game...

    216. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      was he stealing electricity?

      were they supposed to arrest him?

      i think both those answers were yes.

      i've been speeding 7 mph over, and been pulled over, thought it was stupid, and the guy let me go with only "you should know better," but if he gave me a ticket i would have accepted it, because I was over the speed limit.

    217. Re:Tax dollars at work. by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      PCSO's are usually people who wouldn't pass the police entrance exams so they sign up as PCSO to get to walk around in a uniform and push people around despite having no more actual authority than a private citizen. They usually have egos the size of Jupiter and get really butthurt if you point this out to them. Real police detest them as they make everyone in a police uniform look bad.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    218. Re: Tax dollars at work. by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Depends how much the 500 people are paying me for the use of the room, and whether I vake their business or not.

    219. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be perturbed at being arrested for charging a phone myself. It's the LEO's that escalated this situation. It's on them.

    220. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sosume's post didn't compare anything to the US actually... touchy much?

    221. Re:Tax dollars at work. by fuzzy2k · · Score: 1

      Stupid American! .000001 Euros, obviously, in stolen electricity... wait, no - abstracted.

      I suppose it isn't the economics of it, but the principle involved. If they let one person get away with it on the grounds that it makes absolutely no difference to the owner of the electricity or anyone else, anywhere, ever, then soon they could have literally dozens of people eventually doing so, unrepentantly and without negative consequence... but what about that original complainant? Why shouldn't *they* get to impose *their* will on others? *They* have a *uniform* ffs.

      So, I suppose the term "abstracts" is used when there is no physical object to show as evidence? It kind of makes the whole complaint seem silly. Not that I would ever want to suggest that the local constabulary in any given jurisdiction might be better off focusing on what people call, for lack of a better term, real crime. That would seem disrespectful. Kind of like arresting someone for a few -- insert term for small measure of currency in your land here ---'s worth of electricity that would have gone unnoticed but for the remarkable detective work of this brave first responder.

      --
      --- Say something clever. Pretend it was me. Thanks.
    222. Re:Tax dollars at work. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It was tested against the "erratic current" received, just not a transition between two independent and unconnected grids. At most, there should be a single phase jump per transition. Are you asserting that a single change of phase has a large chance of frying consumer electronics and starting a fire?

      Given nearly everything these days works with 50 Hz, or 60 Hz, I'd be surprised if something designed as a "world" power supply couldn't handle a phase jump. As they are already designed for changing/multiple phases.

    223. Re:Tax dollars at work. by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Sad that you have such a shallow view of the world. I'm sure that the immigrant or tourist who has not been educated by your public schools would agree with me. As would the person born in poverty that had to drop out of school in order to live. Both would be rare, but the law must be applied universally or it is unjust.

      I should not have had to show you the exceptions to the rule, you should have been able to see them for yourself. Don't put your "public education" that far above illiterate because it really isn't.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    224. Re: Tax dollars at work. by kenh · · Score: 1

      That would really baffle anyone in the 95% of the human population who's not a literate, native speaker of English.

      Curious how you decided English has such a poor showing across the world?

      English doesn't have to be your primary language to be fluent in it.

      --
      Ken
    225. Re: Tax dollars at work. by kenh · · Score: 1

      If mostly phone chargers, it's most likely 5W and you're talking about 8kWh - which is maybe $1/day.

      Times how many rail cars times how many days/year?

      If a train has 8 rail cars, and those rail cars are used 365 days/year, then you are talking about $2,500/train per year.

      Now how many actual 8 car trains does the railway run? 40? 50?

      As the expense exceeds $100K it starts to look like real money.

      --
      Ken
    226. Re: Tax dollars at work. by kenh · · Score: 1

      To compare it with the train scenario, that would be 30 outlets, in transient use across 24 hours of a day.

      per train - how many trains does the railroad have in operation at one time?

      --
      Ken
    227. Re:Tax dollars at work. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Then that is really sad and it speaks poorly to the human race...

      If 20 cents worth of power is of concern to you, then you have bigger problems in your life that you should be concerned about...

    228. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Yes, as I said, PCSO's are a bunch of jerks, as are self obsesed iphone users who can't read notices that say "don't use this socket".

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    229. Re: Tax dollars at work. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not really relevant when the load for one train per day equals maybe one passenger's fare. Multiplying it into a big number doesn't make it a big percentage of operating expenses.

      And that's only in a worst-case scenario where every outlet is in use 24/7. You're sounding ridiculous but don't realize it.

    230. Re:Tax dollars at work. by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't met any PCSO's most of them struggle with basic grama

      Are they really fit to be police, if they can't manhandle bitty old gra'ma?

    231. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think the phone is more likely to be damaged by the officer tripping over the power cable, than vice versa.

    232. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Can you read? omnichad's post is the one that brought up the US.

    233. Re:Tax dollars at work. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      grrr.... it's "pence" not "cents".

      If you're going to go all the effort of converting to GBP, you could have at least got that right, couldn't you?

      I'm surprised. So many people in the US call our cents pennies. A lot of people don't even know we don't make pennies.

      No worries, at least the UK has had enough sense to not use the euro. Something I don't think has a legal right to even exist since it was never voted in. At least the last I knew even France voted it down.

    234. Re:Tax dollars at work. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Want a list? Here, let me make it a lot more simple for you - virtually every country. They need to be able to tell if you're a wanted person or not.

    235. Re:Tax dollars at work. by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      You do realize this is the UK? We don't use dollars here.

      I agree however, with the sentiment of your post.

      What is the smallest coin in the UK?
      My guess it is still 100+ times too valuable to represent the
      cost of the electricity an iPhone could gather in an hour.
      Someone with data please do the math.

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    236. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      They are not actually police. Their powers of arrest are the same as anyone elses ie they can do a citizens arrest. Mostly they are there to give the impression of more police on the beat. They do not get the extensive training that police do, niether do they have to pass the riggorus medical tests the police do. The only real power they have is to detain you for upto 40 mins until a real cop comes. Most police officers regard them as a bit of a joke. This is not to say that some police forces don't push the boat out and get them properly trained and hold them to high standards. Those forces would be in the minority.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    237. Re: Tax dollars at work. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      That would really baffle anyone in the 95% of the human population who's not a literate, native speaker of English.

      Curious how you decided English has such a poor showing across the world?

      English doesn't have to be your primary language to be fluent in it.

      Well,yeah, but that's balanced out by the large population of native English speakers with a poor command of the language. ;-)

      We're seeing a bit of that here on /. these days ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    238. Re:Tax dollars at work. by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      Smartphone battery ~ 5 W-H, electricity ~$0.15 / kW-H, so 1333 complete drain/charge cycles = $1.00

      https://twitter.com/id_aa_carm...

    239. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      and the monetary value is of less importance than the lack of consent.

      i don't want people touching my things without my consent, i don't want someone waiting there for 15 minutes on my porch, i don't want them thinking that's correct behavior.

      you should people off the street use your restroom too. after all, water is cheap too.

    240. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      the immigrant or tourist agreed implicitly to follow the rules of the country they are moving too/visiting.

      let not the perfect be the enemy of the good.

      100 percent coverage is nigh impossible in the majority of instances. So we should do away with all laws in general.

      the exceptions to the rules...

      you might as well say, you shouldn't use signs to state policy because blind people can't see them. and they might miss them for trying to braille them out in the wrong spot on the wall...

      "i didn't see the sign officer","it was right above the outlet", "yes, but you see, i looked directly at the outlet so i missed the sign"

    241. Re:Tax dollars at work. by laird · · Score: 1

      Also, keep in mind that this happened on a train. Trains don't use electricity from a power company, they generate their own electricity, to keep the engine running, and a separate generator for the lights, PA system, etc. So the "cost" of someone using a tiny amount of electricity is zero, because the generator is always running, etc. And the value of letting people use the available electricity is high, because their phone isn't dead when they get where they are going.

      Trains in the US have had electrical plugs at all seats (for long-distance trains) for a decade or more. They don't bother on subways and short commuter lines because people aren't on them very long (and they tend to run on external power).

    242. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not any different, as this would require that 100% of the people on the trains are fully literate in English.

      Actually quite a bit different. Not 100%, but understandable by the large majority. So I don't understand your "not any different" notion. And it clearly would be understandable by the person to whom I posed the question. So very far away from "not any different."

    243. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need to get a passport and travel a bit and believe everything you see on Sky News, BBC or CNN. I have traveled around the world around 30 to 40 times and I can promise you, that although the U.S. Police may not be in the top ten for most cordial, they don't hold a candle on the scum balls of West & Central Africa, the Middle East or Asia.

    244. Re:Tax dollars at work. by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Trains don't use electricity from a power company, they generate their own electricity

      That may be true in the US but a self-respecting train network is electrified and the article is about the UK and even there this is true for 60% of the journeys. Also if the power outlets where fed from the train's generator they could not be used for cleaning the train when it is at the depot with the engines stopped. The article would also not have said: “If something was directly plugged into it (for example a standard computer, or a laptop without a battery in) the equipment would probably be damaged at any section gaps where the power supply changes from one substation to another!”.

      So the "cost" of someone using a tiny amount of electricity is zero, because the generator is always running, etc.

      This is totally wrong: you're putting a load on the generator which causes the engine to work harder to keep the set speed, thus using extra fuel. I'll grant you however that the consumption increase caused by charging one iPhone is totally marginal and probably not measurable at the generator.

    245. Re:Tax dollars at work. by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Thank you for proving my point regarding not being much above illiterate several times in several displays.

      Workable analogy for anyone else: If a person leaves a box of raisins on the train open for everyone to see, and writes a sign saying "not for public consumption" should it be illegal for someone to eat one of those raisins?

      The obvious answer is no, it should not be illegal. The person who put the open container on the train is an idiot. People who see the bucket and can't read the sign can not have any expectation that the raisins are contraband, nor should they.

      The same thing could be said about an open electrical outlet on a train where a person can easily access the outlet. Being able to see an outlet is not the same thing as being able to read the sign above it, but you can't seem to differentiate object from language.

      I said "for anyone else" due to the fact that I have no confidence in your ability to process rational thoughts. You can not write them, so probably can not read them. I certainly hope that you visit a country like China one day and charge your cell phone in the outlet surrounded by language you can't comprehend. "Never happen with me" works until you are at 0% battery and lost, but you probably can not comprehend that far either.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    246. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      i'd probably make due by asking the hotel receptionist for an adaptor. wall plugs there don't fit my devices. shape or voltage.

      i don't remember running out of power over the course of 20 some odd days and 4 cities, or being terribly lost when i was in china. And no, i don't even charge my phone at in the states unless i'm 80 percent confident nobody would object... which typically means if i see signage around an outlet, i'd most likely look for another.

      you're a bit of a dick aren't you? and i'm done with this thread.

    247. Re:Tax dollars at work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? What vulgar hellhole do you hale from?

      Why does your "freedom of expression" trump everybody else's "freedom to avoid your self-expression"?

  2. Abstracting by Bovius · · Score: 0

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    1. Re:Abstracting by amalcolm · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh ... seems right to me: abstract verb gerund or present participle: abstracting bstrakt/ 1. consider something theoretically or separately from (something else). "to abstract science and religion from their historical context can lead to anachronism" 2. extract or remove (something). "applications to abstract more water from streams" synonyms: extract, pump, draw (off), tap, suck, withdraw, remove, take out/away; More

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    2. Re:Abstracting by Bovius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh. I guess it does mean what you think it means. Carry on then.

    3. Re:Abstracting by dhaen · · Score: 1
      Language consists not of what is written in reference books, that is a mere snapshot of language use. Language is what is in daily use.

      The UK government's use of "abstracting" fits the article exactly.

      Please excuse my language

    4. Re:Abstracting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary was using abstract in an abstruse way.

    5. Re:Abstracting by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      It's the correct legal term in the UK, although it's generally used against people who illegally feed off an existing supply to power high power lamps for growing cannabis.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re: Abstracting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a Figure of Authority says a word means something, then that's what it means. Never challenge Authority.

    7. Re:Abstracting by xdor · · Score: 1

      Here I was thinking he was attempting to abstract electricity and come up with his own implementation — an undeniable threat to the stability of the Commonwealth — but instead he's just a petty thief...

      Ah well, wake me up when there's some real news, would you?

    8. Re:Abstracting by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      ~ Well, studies has shown that the origin of charge is from certain types of subatomic particles which have the property of electric charge. Electric charge gives rise to and interacts with the electromagnetic force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature. The movement of an electric charge becomes an electric current, which usually consists of...
      ~ Sir, I must ask you to stop. Please stand up and put your hands behind your back.
      ~ I'm sorry, were we talking too loud? I'm only helping my granddaughter with her homework...
      ~ Right, that's it! He's becoming aggressive! Release the dogs!

      .

    9. Re:Abstracting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means what you think it doesn't mean.

  3. Re:abstracting electricity? by amalcolm · · Score: 1

    abstract Oh yes we can: verb gerund or present participle: abstracting bstrakt/ 1. consider something theoretically or separately from (something else). "to abstract science and religion from their historical context can lead to anachronism" 2. extract or remove (something). "applications to abstract more water from streams" synonyms: extract, pump, draw (off), tap, suck, withdraw, remove, take out/away; More

    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
  4. you can't blame her for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keepin it real.

  5. iPhone by dhaen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why does nearly every article mention the type of phone?

    Would it be any different if he was charging a cheap Nolkia - or even his shaver?

    1. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it matters. He's a winner, and winners get their day. Nokia? That's Windows? LOSER! And losers do not get theirs. Well, they do, but a lump of coal and venereal warts for Christmas.

    2. Re:iPhone by Zocalo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Probably because iPhone users needing constant power top-ups has become something of a standing joke; every time you hear of someone doing something crazy, desperate and/or illegal to do this it's almost always for an iPhone, so it entertains the majority of reader/viewers who will not own an iPhone (Apple's market share is "Hah! Another iPhone user caught short of power! LOL!" There's probably a grain of truth to it too; it's not the kind of story I actively seek out and I'm sure there are instances of another brand of phone being involved in incidents like this, but off the top of my head I don't recall ever coming across any and it's always the iPhone users that seem to be going around the office asking if anyone has a charger they can borrow.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it'd be different if he were charging his vibrator.

    4. Re:iPhone by Metabolife · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a news reporting technique where they captivate more readers with something familiar. An article that reads, "Owner saves labrador retriever from fire." Will draw not only the doglover crowd, but will get a bigger emotional impact from the lab owners for no extra effort. In the case of the iPhone, it happens to have the largest userbase for the article to tap into.

    5. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the clicks.

      What I find amusing is the officer was a woman. I wonder if she was new to her job. I find dealing with newly minted female bureacrats the worst - they're like you're uptight 7th grade English teacher (almost always female) teaching grammar. By the book or will have it thrown at you.

      I wouldn't have mentioned anything, but her charge of his aggression sounds like a guy objecting normally and she going bonkers with her authoriteh. Granted, in America it would have gotten you shot by the roving cowboy force, but the police in UK tend to be more laid back in normal circumstances.

      *Cue the outraged egalitarians telling me I shouldn't notice any differences.

    6. Re:iPhone by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Because he was arrested for being a hipster; the iPhone reference adds credibility to the report

    7. Re:iPhone by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Funny

      One does not charge a Nokia, one simply unpacks it and then uses it while it refuses to die despite all your best efforts.

    8. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im more interested in what race the fellow was?

    9. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we hatez teh Applez!!!!

    10. Re:iPhone by bledri · · Score: 1

      Why does nearly every article mention the type of phone?

      Would it be any different if he was charging a cheap Nolkia - or even his shaver?

      Yes, it would be a totally different story if he was charging a Nokia. It would be fiction.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    11. Re:iPhone by Drathos · · Score: 1

      Well, according to their latest ad campaign "If it's not an iPhone, it's not an iPhone."

      See also: "No shit, Sherlock!"

      --
      End of line..
    12. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it adds detail to the story. Same as when you hear about a car crash, they mention the brands and types involved. Have you never read a news story in the last 30 years?

    13. Re:iPhone by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1

      Namedropping will get you more clicks. If a person uses the same brand as you, you're in the same tribe.

    14. Re:iPhone by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my Nokia N900 which cant even survive a full day of use (calls, Internet, other stuff) anymore :(

    15. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed this with videos and GoPro cameras. I can't believe GoPro has paid all of these people to mention that this video was made with a GoPro, but time and again I see TV networks and such constantly mentioning this.

      It's a marketer's wet dream. It seems like they make good cameras but I've never noticed any other camera mentioned so casually or even at all.

      Everything else is just video or maybe dash-cam video.

    16. Re:iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you are in the same class of phone user as my cousin is....he won't buy a newer phone until his old nokia dies and it absolutely refuse to die despite the best attempts by some of his friends and family.

  6. Read TFA by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We were called to Camden Road London Overground station on Friday 10 July to a report of a man becoming aggressive when challenged by a PCSO about his use of a plug socket onboard an Overground train.

    While arrest may have been an overreaction, the guy was using a socket clearly marked not for public use and then seems to have become aggressive when asked to unplug his phone. Maybe he needs to look at his own behaviour as well.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Read TFA by Sique · · Score: 2

      According to the article, the resolution to arrest him was already clear before the police even knew how he would react.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]Abstracting electricity is a statutory offence in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
      This offence is created by section 13 of the Theft Act 1968:

        A person who dishonestly uses without due authority, or dishonestly causes to be wasted or diverted, any electricity shall on conviction on indictment be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.[1]
      [/quote]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstracting_electricity

    3. Re:Read TFA by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We were called to Camden Road London Overground station on Friday 10 July to a report of a man becoming aggressive when challenged by a PCSO about his use of a plug socket onboard an Overground train.

      While arrest may have been an overreaction, the guy was using a socket clearly marked not for public use and then seems to have become aggressive when asked to unplug his phone. Maybe he needs to look at his own behaviour as well.

      Yep, I'll bet it unfolded something like this:

      Hobby Bobby asked him to unplug his phone, instead of unplugging his phone he decided to give the PCSO some lip and it became a battle of egos after that.

      This could have been easily avoided by not having an attitude. The problem wasn't using a mere 10 pence of electricity, rather the antisocial behaviour that followed being asked to unplug his phone.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a crime elsewhere too, it's just more commonly known as "Theft of service". It applies to water, electricity, Internet, etc

    5. Re:Read TFA by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      The statement says he had already acted aggressively even before the police were involved. Perhaps if he had just unplugged the phone the policed would never have been involved.

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    6. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's some antisocial behaviour....

      FUCK YOU.
      You motherfuckers rigged the damn tram for juice and so ima gonna jack my shit in there.
      So either git yo ass back up in the cab and kill the breaker, or FUCK OFF.

    7. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far there has been no supplied proof that the socket was clearly labled. Just the claim by the company having used the service often well not all of them are.

    8. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hilariously lacking in detail. "Lee was then arrested on a second offence of “unacceptable behaviour” after “becoming aggressive” when objecting to his prior arrest." That could be anything from throwing a punch to describing the community officer using mildly intemperate language.

    9. Re:Read TFA by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hobby Bobby asked him to unplug his phone, instead of unplugging his phone he decided to give the PCSO some lip and it became a battle of egos after that.

      He'd probably been taking expert legal advice on UK law (from American teenagers on the internet) and thought he could get away scot free with dissing the PCSO.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Read TFA by weilawei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem wasn't using a mere 10 pence of electricity, rather the antisocial behaviour

      You fucking cunts and your ASBOs. Go fuck yourself, go fuck your mother, and die in a fire. And to quote gstoddart (one of my favorite lines on Slashdot lately):

      Shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker and tits. Fuck you, fuck off, go the fuck away, and don't make me tell you again.

      Am I doing it right? Thankfully, I live in a country which, in theory, protects offensive speech.

    11. Re:Read TFA by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      the guy was using a socket clearly marked not for public use

      What the heck does "clearly not marked for public use" mean? I've never seen a socket marked either way. In the US, people do this all the time in airports and convention centers. It is common to see a cluster of people hanging out in an otherwise unused area of a convention center or airport, huddled around some power outlets.

    12. Re:Read TFA by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Okay, I withdraw my statement and shame myself because I didn't RTFA. The article says:

      Electricity sockets on Overground trains are clearly marked with the words: “cleaners use only and not for public use”.

    13. Re:Read TFA by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Probably why the article mentions his phone type as an iPhone so everyone can make the assumption themselves that he was probably an asshole anyway.

    14. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps if the rent-a-cop hadn't been acting the bitch, nothing would have happened.

    15. Re:Read TFA by zildgulf · · Score: 1

      Yes, we protect offensive speech...Unless you are stupid enough to try it to our trigger happy police and you are a minority.

    16. Re:Read TFA by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      If only Patti LuPone were there, all this could have been avoided.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    17. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No excuse for being aggressive.

      I would however interpret the sign the same way as the ones in the toilets saying "not drinking water". Meaning it is not safe to drink it. However, arresting someone for using the water for stealing the water for drinking, is clearly ridiculous. Same with this.

    18. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. We should all get in the habit of being polite and obedient when told to do something unreasonable by an authority figure.

    19. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker and tits. Fuck you, BANG!
                                                                                                            (^ sound of gun being discharged)

      FTFY

    20. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, here. Telling overly active hall monitors to suck a lemon is not anti-social behavior. We need more, not less, of that sort of thing.

    21. Re:Read TFA by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yes, we protect offensive speech...Unless you are stupid enough to try it to our trigger happy police and you are a minority.

      In the UK if you mouth off to the police you get arrested for an hour and a charge that is dismissed in court.

      In the US if you mouth off to the police you get tasered and pinned to the ground whilst the officer shouts "stop resisting".

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    22. Re:Read TFA by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Am I doing it right?

      Only if you're 5 years old.

      If you're an adult you only sound like a blithering idiot. English people are much more eloquent with their insults and dont need to rely on trying to shock people with haphazard displays of vulgarity.

      Thankfully, I live in a country which, in theory, protects offensive speech.

      if you bothered to keep up, he wasn't arrested for offensive speech, he was arrested for disobeying a lawful police instruction (you know that the powerpoints on these trains are locked, its not like he accidentally plugged it in). As far as I know, disobeying a lawful police instruction is illegal everywhere where there are laws and police.

      Also if you bothered to watch any UK TV you'd notice how much more offensive language there is compared to American TV. Just look at how often the word "cock" gets dropped on Top Gear. The US has to censor the word "bugger" for crying out loud. As always, even the offensive language on UK TV is much more sophisticated than its contemporaries across the pond.

      Seems your "protected" speech isn't as protected as ours. Toodles

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not living in a country which protects you from the results of your offensive speech. It allows you the right to have the offensive speech but also allows others to make your life equally uncomfortable for taking advantage of that right in certain situations becasue your rights do not superseed others peoples rights at all times.

      Go to an adult only venue and swear you head off ...offensive speech free territory, you might get asked to leafe but that is about it. Now try going to a kidergarten and swear your head off in front of any number of students greater than zero and a judge is likely to agree you were disturbing the peace. You have the right to offensive speech you don't have it without consequences.

      Now fuck you, fuck off, go the fuck away, and don't make me tell you again ;-)

    24. Re:Read TFA by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      well you know...

      -X- while black

      is a pretty fucking serious offense here.

  7. Re:He stole, he got arrested by amalcolm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't you think a reprimand - "you can't do that here sir" - would have been more appropriate? He probably 'stole' less in monetary terms than if he'd used an excessive amount of loo paper.

    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
  8. Re:He stole, he got arrested by amalcolm · · Score: 2

    You're funny :)

    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
  9. He encountered a promotion hungry plastic plod... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    They have to do time as a PCSO BEFORE they can be considered for training as a real Policeman... this one had been reading the law books and looking for anything to make a mark with...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  10. Free in Barcelona by dkatana · · Score: 2

    In Barcelona you'll find free-to-use sockets on FGC trains, some bus stops and metro stations.Usually 5v USB sockets.

    1. Re:Free in Barcelona by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Some trains have mains sockets for public use, next ot the seats or under the tables. Many trains have one per carriage only, marked "not for public use", I think because they can have all sorts of nasty voltage spikes and aren't actually guaranteed to be remotely within spec. I think they use them for cleaning when the train is stationary, usually.

      I've used them plenty of times with no ill effect though.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Free in Barcelona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the overgrounds in Montreal have such warnings. They're primarily there as a complaint/lawsuit-deterrent.

      We don't give a flying f*** if you want to plug your phone in there, but these are the same trains that blow out for a couple of hours every few weeks, that sometimes change providers or even polarities somewhere between two platforms, and this lets us go "look you weren't allowed to plug that there we can't be held responsible" whenever someone whines their microchips couldn't handle a massive surge.

    3. Re:Free in Barcelona by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In Barcelona you'll find free-to-use sockets on FGC trains, some bus stops and metro stations.Usually 5v USB sockets.

      And what precisely does that have to do with sockets on London trains?

      Even if the guy came from Barcelona himself, you don't get to import your own laws into a foreign country.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Free in Barcelona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some trains have mains sockets for public use, next ot the seats or under the tables. Many trains have one per carriage only, marked "not for public use", I think because they can have all sorts of nasty voltage spikes and aren't actually guaranteed to be remotely within spec. I think they use them for cleaning when the train is stationary, usually.

      Plus they're at ankle level in the vestibules next to the door, well away from the seats and in a high traffic area. It's a trip hazard if there are cables plugged in there during public use, and gets in the way of people moving around the train.

    5. Re:Free in Barcelona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think because they can have all sorts of nasty voltage spikes and aren't actually guaranteed to be remotely within spec. I think they use them for cleaning when the train is stationary, usually.

      They're driven directly from the track current (via a simple step-down transformer). That's fine when the train is stationary during cleaning, but when the train is moving there are massive spikes when you move between sections. They aren't necessarily on the same phase, as you crossover they may be connected to 2 phases at the same time, and there are large spikes every time the pad arcs (shower of sparks) because of a bump/dirt/etc. It's not safe at all for a device to be connected while that's happening as it's well outside of the spec the devices are designed for. The multiple phases mean you might have a supply voltage of 480V for brief periods of time for example, despite it nominally being a 240V socket.

      The ones by your seat are regulated so that they give a safe stable current.

  11. That is by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

    one abstract country

  12. Ignored Posted Signs by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The guy ignored the signs on the outlets stating that they were for use by cleaners only, not by passengers.

    The police dropped the original charge but he apparently couldn't keep from mouthing off to the officers involved about it so they arrested him again.

    *Yawn*

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    1. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by symes · · Score: 2

      Exactly - he was arrested for being aggressive and mouthing off. He was originally, and politely asked, to respect the fact that this power outlet was not for customers. He didn't, he was a dick, and it serves him right. End of story.

    2. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, when the police swear and shout, it's fine. Because they're meant to uphold the law, not obey it.

      Oh, and to the others going "Hey, it's a crime, he stole", actually, this is less than the legal tender minimum (1p) and even if it were, would only count as misdemeanor up to, IIRC, £50. So, no, it isn't a crime.

      But I guess you gotta protect authority, especially private authority.

    3. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "use by cleaners only" has nothing to do with the intended use of electricity, it's a CYA notice for when some aspect of the supply to that socket doesn't meet current electrical installation regs (i.e. no RCD or double pole isolation) and thus should only be used by "trained personnel" with the assumption being that at some point the cleaners have been told to inspect the cables on the equipment before they plug it in.

    4. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nurse! He's out of his bed again!

    5. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      As the article says, it's driven from the track current, and is subject to abrupt phase changes when crossing between sections.

    6. Re: Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent. You've presented a reasonable analog for the sort of jackassery illustrated by the subject of this article. You're to be commended for really getting into the role, to show us why the arrest was perfectly warranted. Kudos to you, man.

    7. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Yeah, fuck freedom of speech.

      The UK does not have the equivalent of the U.S. 2nd amendment; that's how they get way with things like "The Right to be Forgotten" and their ridiculous libel laws, when it comes to public persons.

      Also, in the U.S., he would also have been arrested for mouthing off. You are only allowed to mouth off in a "Free Speech Zone".

    8. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Barny · · Score: 1

      *sighs*

      Coming!

      *brings the medication again*

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    9. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      What gets me is that the idea of being arrested not for violating a law but for being a malcontent seems to have a lot of supporters in the UK. Doesn't seem like a place I'd want to live in. Not trying to be a jackass myself most of the times, but.. wow. Strange idea of freedom, really.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    10. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Of course, when the police swear and shout, it's fine

      Actually, no, it isn't. If the police swear at you it's a disciplinable offence. Take their number and report them.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    11. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by squizzar · · Score: 1

      Your freedom of speech does not extend to verbal assault of a police officer.
      http://www.inbrief.co.uk/offen...

      You can complain, argue, discuss etc. as much as you like, and they may eventually get bored and go away. Get offensive and they will arrest you. It's a trap for stupid people who seem to think freedom of speech means they are free to say what they want without consequences - especially if you say those things to police officers.

      For additional fun check out our libel and slander laws. There's a reason people come from all over the world to prosecute for saying things about people here.

    12. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Also, in the U.S., he would also have been arrested for mouthing off. You are only allowed to mouth off in a "Free Speech Zone".

      Unless he was black, in which case he would have been shot.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    13. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by daedalus2097 · · Score: 1

      All depends on your perspective really. For me, having the freedom to walk into a gun store and buy a gun is frightening, and I wouldn't like to live in a country like that.

    14. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Yeah, fuck freedom of speech.

      The UK does not have the equivalent of the U.S. 2nd amendment

      First Amendment. Second is RKBA, not Speech.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    15. Re: Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, you want to get your guns from the flower store? You fruitcake.

    16. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, fuck freedom of speech. Sheesh, what was he thinking, that malcontent! Praise be to our betters! War is peace! Freedom is slavery!

      Yeah, I'm sure in the US if you start shouting and swearing at a cop they just quietly applaud you for upholding the Constitution.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    17. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      What gets me is that the idea of being arrested not for violating a law but for being a malcontent seems to have a lot of supporters in the UK. Doesn't seem like a place I'd want to live in. Not trying to be a jackass myself most of the times, but.. wow. Strange idea of freedom, really.

      Abusing police officers is violating a law, genius. I doubt that there are many countries in the world where you are allowed to abuse law enforcement officers to their faces with impunity.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      We don't have misdemeanors in the UK. Something is either a crime or not.

      You don't generally don't count things like speeding for declaring to employers, but they are still criminal offences.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd much rather mouth-off to a UK policeman than a US one.

      From my own experience (no, I wasn't the person doing it), here's what happens when you argue with a UK copper:

      You argue. Policeman says something along the lines of "Ok, sir calm down".

      You continue. Your voice raises in volume. Policeman says: "Listen - you're not doing yourself any good here. Calm down and don't make a disturbance."

      You add in a few 'fuck-you's'. Policeman says: "Carry on like that and I'll nick you"

      You continue. You get nicked.

      Lose your shit with a copper who's just trying to do his or her job and you'll get nicked. Explain yourself all you want, calmly, and you'll be fine.

      Best experience with a copper was new year's 2000 when a friend of mine was so drunk he thought he'd piss on the wheel of a police car. A woman PC saw him walking towards her car whilst unzipping his jeans. The copper shouted "If you piss on my car, I will *not* be happy". He chuckled and proceeded to piss on the tyre. Policewoman got out of car, instructed my mate to put his knob back in his trousers. He turned towards her (dick still out) and waggled it around. Copper went to get her handcuffs, stopped, laughed and told my mate to put himself away, fuck off, and have a good night.

      As he walked away, she shouted after him that he'd pissed all over his own trousers.

      Ah, good times, good times!

    20. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, he would have been shot by the police. He could have been carrying a concealed weapon, and as soon as he became belligerent, he became a threat to officer safety.

    21. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by bledri · · Score: 1

      What gets me is that the idea of being arrested not for violating a law but for being a malcontent seems to have a lot of supporters in the UK. Doesn't seem like a place I'd want to live in. Not trying to be a jackass myself most of the times, but.. wow. Strange idea of freedom, really.

      1. Even in the US, freedom of speech is not absolute.
      2. Talk back to a cop in the US and you will end up facedown, handcuffed with a knee in your back.
      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    22. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abusing police officers is violating a law, genius. I doubt that there are many countries in the world where you are allowed to abuse law enforcement officers to their faces with impunity.

      Simply shouting at someone, even if they're law enforcement, shouldn't get you arrested. And shouting at a police officer who is overzealously arresting you is certainly understandable.

    23. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While abusing police officers trying to do their job is considering criminal, where does that leave officers who obviously are not doing their job? I'd argue the moment a police officer oversteps his authority and begins to chicane civilians, he's no longer a police officer, as he no longer acts in accordance with the law (no, "theft" of 0.01 p worth of electricity isn't going to fly anywhere), and thus have lost all authority he derived from it. This story seems quite one-sided.

    24. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All depends on your perspective really. For me, having the freedom to walk into a gun store and buy a gun is frightening, and I wouldn't like to live in a country like that.

      To paraphrase: "For me, ..freedom...is frightening."

      For the rest of us it's ....freedom.

    25. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Officially, in the US, you can say anything to a cop that you could say to another human. There are narrow limits, but for the most part, you can speak to a cop however you like (officially, that is). Officially, they cannot beat or taze you, but without real consequences, the police can pretty much do whatever they like. Now, abuse? No, you cannot hit a cop legally.

    26. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by nullforce · · Score: 1

      Not everywhere in the U.S. http://www.leoaffairs.com/feat...

    27. Re:Ignored Posted Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly - he was arrested for being aggressive and mouthing off.

      Yes, how dare he insult his local Lord ... err Officer.

  13. That's what you get for being pissy ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    That's what you get for being pissy with the police.

    "Oh, I'm sorry sir/ma'am, I wasn't aware that this is strictly prohibited. No,it won't happen again. Thank you sir/ma'am." .... and continue your day like nothing happened. Not that hard, is it? But I guess this guy had to cause trouble. I bet he got what he deserved.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:That's what you get for being pissy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for being civil, but when some jobsworth with no power of arrest is trying to get you nicked for stealing electricity worth less than the paper he would need to write up the citation it is a citizens public duty to tell him politely but firmly to go fuck himself.

    2. Re:That's what you get for being pissy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you get fucked for being stupid douchebag who doesn't understand that stealing things is still illegal, even if they're low in value.

      Or do you want to start drawing lines? Is a chocolate bar too low in value to matter? Or maybe a couple of apples? Or an iphone?

    3. Re:That's what you get for being pissy ... by mjwx · · Score: 2

      That's what you get for being pissy with the police.

      "Oh, I'm sorry sir/ma'am, I wasn't aware that this is strictly prohibited. No,it won't happen again. Thank you sir/ma'am." .... and continue your day like nothing happened. Not that hard, is it? But I guess this guy had to cause trouble. I bet he got what he deserved.

      The whole thing could have been defused with a simple "OK" and unplugging of the device.

      No need to even be polite, although that isn't a bad thing to do anyway.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:That's what you get for being pissy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicking electricity from a socket which *specifically* tells you not to use it. If you're going to ignore the notice not to use it then fuck you.

    5. Re:That's what you get for being pissy ... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm all for being civil, but when some jobsworth with no power of arrest is trying to get you nicked for stealing electricity worth less than the paper he would need to write up the citation it is a citizens public duty to tell him politely but firmly to go fuck himself.

      And then the jobsworth with no power of arrest calls in his/her colleagues who are told that you have been acting threateningly in public, and who do arrest you on suspicion of threatening behaviour, and you spend a few hours staring at the walls of a police station before they let you go.

      You must have a lot of free time to waste..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:That's what you get for being pissy ... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the now legendary "it can't be stealing because I can't even see it" electricity-stealing defence.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:That's what you get for being pissy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that really what people think now? That you *deserve* being arrested if you're pissed off about a ridiculous and clearly wrong arrest over NOT EVEN 1 PENNY? Man, what is the world coming to ...

  14. Yes? by ledow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Technically it's theft. You've cost the rail company money (pittance though it may be) and potentially risked a fire by plugging an unknown device into an electrical socket.

    Even in my workplace, that will get you disciplined. You at least have to get a PAT test before you can do that and it's only by the goodwill of the employer that they let you use the sockets.

    Incredibly petty? Maybe. But that's not the point. And getting aggressive about it is what really gets you arrested and in trouble, you could have talked your way out of the first "arrest" without problem but it may have made you late for work.

    But, yes, technically, it's not your socket, it's not your electricity, the sockets are CLEARLY marked that you're not allowed to do that, you didn't ask permission.

    In my workplace (schools), we have told off parents for doing exactly this during open-days, etc. They just wander into the school and plug into the first socket they see and then leave the device on and charging and wander off.

    We use threat of the same law to stop them doing it (but we probably wouldn't go so far as arrest, but arrest is NOT a charge - people always confuse this distinction - you arrest somebody to stop them leaving while you work out if they've actually committed a crime that anybody cares about), but we're not worried about the electricity cost as much as the electrical safety implications. If their cheap shit Chinese charger catches fire and burns down the school, we don't care who was liable, but our insurers and lawyers sure will.

    And I'm not talking tiny state schools, but large independent (private) schools where pissing off a parent costs you more money than you earn in a year if they pull their kids out. But still we don't let them do it.

    It's petty. But it's still theft, effectively (the name of the charge is just a specific one for theft of electricity). Arrest may be an overreaction but arrest is not charge. Getting aggressive over something you know you shouldn't have done (no matter how petty) gets you arrested twice, and certainly charged at least once.

    Don't plug into other people's sockets without asking. And if you can't ask or think the answer might be no, don't plug into the socket anyway.

    And then there's the question of how did you activate the socket because all the UK train sockets I see are keyed with a large hex-key in order to turn them on. It's not just a case of plugging in by accident not realising the socket wasn't for public use.

    1. Re:Yes? by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      Technically it's theft. You've cost the rail company money (pittance though it may be) and potentially risked a fire by plugging an unknown device into an electrical socket.

      I stopped reading here and I'm seriously hoping you're kidding. "risked a fire"? Seriously?

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    2. Re:Yes? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      And then there's the question of how did you activate the socket because all the UK train sockets I see are keyed with a large hex-key in order to turn them on.

      The ones on worst craptial connect aren't. They just have a "do not use" sign on.

      As for the train companies, I have less than zero sympathy. Sure they might have lost 0.01p of electricity, but they made up for it billions of times over by concocting procedures to deny people refunds which they're due.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time I've seen someone plug something into an outlet on a train, there was a small fire. Of course, that was a 1,500W hair dryer and not a 10W phone charger...

    4. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there's the question of how did you activate the socket because all the UK train sockets I see are keyed with a large hex-key in order to turn them on. It's not just a case of plugging in by accident not realising the socket wasn't for public use.

      Not all - First Great Western trains along the M4 corridor have plug sockets at tables and under seats with stickers allowing you to charge your phone/tablet/laptop. Perhaps the guy presume the same was allowed on other trains to?

    5. Re: Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the fucking article, jackass.

      Seriously; the answers you clearly don't seem to understand are there.

    6. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep - never heard of the Kings Cross fire? It may sound stupid but fires have been caused by faulty chargers - Transport For London would be negligent if they didn't mitigate this risk by disabling power sockets or making them authorised use only.

    7. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All UK train sockets I see just work when you plug a device into them -- no hex key required. Which trains are you travelling on?

    8. Re:Yes? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The only time I've seen someone plug something into an outlet on a train, there was a small fire. Of course, that was a 1,500W hair dryer and not a 10W phone charger...

      Funniest comment in this thread, for multiple reasons

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Yes? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      Alright, it's electricity theft, but "risked a fire"? Come on.

      And by 'getting aggressive' do you mean a fistfight or threat of violence or something? No of course you don't, you just mean an exchange of words. Something that AT MOST would warrant a temporary arrest and escorting out of the property/train/whatever for release.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    10. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean when a match fell on grease under an escalator? Pro tip : they don't put grease on power sockets.

    11. Re:Yes? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      In America we plug things into other people's sockets all the time, and I think it's even an electrical code violation to make the socket unavailable.

      While I'm sure they have the right to ask you to leave if they don't want you using their power, they can't have you arrested for it. It's even the same for a gun in most states, you can be asked to leave and arrested for not leaving after police show up, but not arrested for the gun itself. Granted, the gun example is not true in all jurisdictions, I Am Not A Lawyer etc.

      Unless you're hurting someone or breaking something, the only punishment for violating one of these "rules" should be being asked to leave, and then being detained or removed if you refuse to do so or if go back after they told you not to come back on their property. Pretty simple stuff really, granted some areas have hard to deal with people; in a lot of the USA everyone is pretty friendly minus large metropolitan areas where they try to fix this by adding more rules.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    12. Re:Yes? by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You work at a really, supremely, fucked up place. In the sane world, newer classrooms have outlets at every desk so students can charge their laptops, at the podium so speakers can plug their laptops in, and in offices so workers can plug in their phones/laptops. And no, an electrician doesn't test every single phone and laptop before it gets plugged in because WHAT FUCKING PLANET ARE YOU FROM.

      Outside of schools, public places like airports and bus stops have outlets for people waiting around. And airplanes and trains often have outlets at the seats. Perhaps you've noticed that portable electronic devices like computers and phones have become more common in recent years. That likely has something to do with the recent explosion of outlets in public places.

      And perhaps -- no, almost certainly -- your school, like so many primary and secondary schools, is run by a neurotic, petty dictator who gets off on controlling every possible aspect of students' and others' behavior, and who will use any possible excuse, no matter how stupid and absurd ("fire safety"), to exercise this control.

      Just curious, is your school also one of the ones where students or employees will get expelled for having premarital, consensual sex with each other?

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    13. Re:Yes? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and potentially risked a fire by plugging an unknown device into an electrical socket.

      ^ Lame.

      Disciplined for charging a phone? You employers are retards.

      No good reason why parents shouldn't charge their phones.

      You are getting pissy about 0.1c worth of electricity and a risk of fire so low it's not worth thinking about.

      And I'm not talking tiny state schools, but large independent (private) schools where pissing off a parent costs you more money than you earn in a year if they pull their kids out. But still we don't let them do it.

      You're a control freak and a really stupid one at that.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    14. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wat? All coaches I have ridden in the UK (Oxford - London, Oxford - Heathrow, Oxford - Gatwick), and I assume a lot more of them,are equipped with sockets for this precise purpose, to charge laptops and phones. Heck, some of them even have USB connectors. I think it's the train companies that are out of touch with reality (and so are you).

    15. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the "risked a fire" comes from the outlets not being designed to be used when the train is in motion, only in depots (for cleaners). There can apparently be power surges when the train moves between substations, so there might actually be a fire risk.

    16. Re:Yes? by AndyCanfield · · Score: 1

      You can plug your phone into my socket.

    17. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know how low the risk of fire is, it may be a recalled model of charger, it may have spent time underwater, it could be the wrong charger for the device, they may have repaired it themselves without training or qualifications. If you don't have an engineer's report on a device, you don't plug it into your power grid while you're responsible for other people's children. If the worst happens, the parents will be looking for your blood.

    18. Re:Yes? by swb · · Score: 1

      Surely you're just trolling here, what possible rationale would they have for not allowing the use of electrical sockets for charging mobile phones?

      I don't buy the risk of fire answer at all as I assume that there's some consumer electronics standards for safety that must be met for selling chargers in the UK. Even if some cheap Chinese chargers slip in, the fire risk is still absurdly low based on the number of actual fires vs. the number of chargers in use.

      I don't buy the cost of electricity either. A USB charger uses what, 7-8 watts? 100 people charging their phones for an hour each day probably isn't even enough to use enough power to tick off more than a couple pennies of electricity.

      I might buy this argument if it was about portable kettles or heating elements of some kind (I'm personally amazed so many people get away with portable heaters under their desk), but I doubt that most people walk around with a portable kettle.

    19. Re:Yes? by ledow · · Score: 1

      "And no, an electrician doesn't test every single phone and laptop before it gets plugged in because WHAT FUCKING PLANET ARE YOU FROM."

      The UK. Where PAT testing of every "portable appliance" is mandatory for schools.

      Yes, we have to test every single cable that gets plugged in. For precisely the reasons stated (student buys cheap-shit Chinese charger rather than expensive Apple charger and ends up catching the classroom on fire... been there, seen it, done it).

      The outlets in questions are NOT for public use. There may be ones for public use on some trains, but not on the Overground (those are locked ones, with a hex-key, for cleaners only).

      It has nothing to do with neurotic dictators - UK and EU electrical law is just stricter. You can't modify cabling in your home without being Part-P certified, you certainly can't modify cabling in a school without being insured and certified and ALL portable appliances need to have an annual test (and/or a test before first use) unless they are literally brand new out of the box.

      Same as the last 15 schools I worked in (state, private, primary, secondary, further, consultancy, permanent position, it doesn't matter).

    20. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for insurance. The building burns down, no one will pay if an external untested device has been found. So fuck off with your attitude, you know nothing about the case in question. Grow the fuck up, kid.

    21. Re:Yes? by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Your comment is probably the single best argument against overregulation ever made.

      (student buys cheap-shit Chinese charger rather than expensive Apple charger and ends up catching the classroom on fire... been there, seen it, done it).

      What does this mean? It seems to say that you've personally set at least one classroom on fire with faulty phone chargers, but that can't be right, because that's absurd.

      Do you test every electrical appliance tourists bring into the country? I mean, they could catch the hotel on fire, right?

      Never mind ... there's no point trying to make sense of this brain damage.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    22. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America we plug things into other people's sockets all the time, and I think it's even an electrical code violation to make the socket unavailable.

      It would certainly be a code violation to sabotage a socket, but there's no law I know about regarding putting a lock or other security device on one. I can imagine a safety regulation in some few cases might even require it.

    23. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PAT tests are not applicable to double earthed appliances, which includes every phone charger I've ever seen. The testing requirement for double earthed appliances is a visual check by the user before use.

    24. Re:Yes? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Technically it's theft. You've cost the rail company money (pittance though it may be) and potentially risked a fire by plugging an unknown device into an electrical socket.

      I stopped reading here and I'm seriously hoping you're kidding. "risked a fire"? Seriously?

      Why do you think firms have to do PAT testing?

      And in your universe is there no such thing as an electrically-based fire?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:Yes? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You mean when a match fell on grease under an escalator? Pro tip : they don't put grease on power sockets.

      And, of course, there has never been a fire caused by a faulty electrical appliance or overloaded electrical socket.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re:Yes? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The dickwad in question here was only temporarily arrested, they let him go later without any charges.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:Yes? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That AND electrocution. Some countries have laws requiring electrical equipment used in workplaces (and a train is someone's workplace) to be tested and tagged as electrically safe.

      Other countries let people burn their houses down. What the heck is an arc-fault-interrupter, and why is America the only country in the world that seems to need them to prevent their houses from burning down?

      People think just because they paid a few cents for something that they are immortal but basic things can cause serious damage like double adapters which allow you to overload the power rating of sockets, or cheap knock-off ebay chargers where CE stands for Chinese Engineered which is the only certification it actually complies with.

    28. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW most consumer devices are a considerable hazard as they have no 3rd prong "earth ground". My guess is the first thing the electrician does is an ground leak test, which isn't even possible without the 3rd prong, and devices that fail are unsafe anywhere.

    29. Re: Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better solution: get fire insurance with terms which aren't pants-on-head retarded. So you don't need a lawyer after they welch on the payment with the claim that your bureaucratic hoop compliant light bulb which winds up charred beyond recognition wasn't certified.

    30. Re:Yes? by Molt · · Score: 1

      Yes. Plugging a crappy phone charger into a circuit which could be surging wildly due to the section gaps described in the article is a fire risk.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    31. Re:Yes? by Molt · · Score: 1
      From the article:

      On a forum dedicated to the London Underground, members have pointed out that plug sockets on the trains are for cleaning equipment deployed when trains are in depots. They recommend not charging electronic equipment as there is a risk of power surge: “If something was directly plugged into it (for example a standard computer, or a laptop without a battery in) the equipment would probably be damaged at any section gaps where the power supply changes from one substation to another!”

      This isn't necessarily a standard plug socket, it's intended to be safe for cleaners to use in stations (likely where the at-seat passenger outlets aren't working due to the train's main electrics being switched off) but there's no such guarantee whilst in motion. Many phone chargers won't handle the erratic power supply well. That is a fire risk.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    32. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A student brought in a faulty phone battery backup unit (the kind you plug your phone into to charge on the go) to my work place a few weeks ago. The device hadn't been working so he wanted to ask some colleagues on how to fix it, and managed to get a colleague to play with it. The guy cleaned the contacts and then plugged it into an outlet in his cubicle. The battery caught fire, and even though someone grabbed an extinguisher and put it out quickly, the smoke and someone yelling "fire" was enough for someone to pull the alarm. Fire alarm evacuations aren't optional - someone pulls it, you leave or you get disciplined later, and rightly so. All 450 employees in the building then stood outside until the local firemen arrived and cleared it. Due to the fact that it was an actual fire, however minor, this took about an hour (mostly to clear the smoke). So, 450 * ~40/hr = $18000 just for the man hours, not to mention fire services costs etc.

      No policy changes resulted from this, however if we have another similar event in the next year or so, I would bet on some ridiculous rules coming down, and they wouldn't necessarily be wrong about it. This is why we can't have nice things.

    33. Re:Yes? by sjames · · Score: 1

      No wonder I hear so many jokes with a bitter undertone about "health and safety" from over there.

    34. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how will the entitled i users keep twittering or facebooking inane things?

    35. Re:Yes? by david672orford · · Score: 1

      Technically it's theft. You've cost the rail company money (pittance though it may be) and potentially risked a fire by plugging an unknown device into an electrical socket.

      Saying it is a pittance is an understatement. If the rate is 17p/kwh, his phone charger draws 10 watts, and he kept it plugged in for half an hour then he 'stole' 0.085p. This is the price of half a paper towel from a public toilet. It is the cost of leaving the light on in the toilet for three minutes. It is the cost of filling a 0.5 litre bottle from the tap in the public toilet. It is 1/3500th of the price of an Underground ticket.

    36. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if the person refuses to leave even after the store has told them to leave, there's nothing the store can do?

      You're grossly misreporting the story. The analogy would be:

      Store asks to stop. You don't / ignore them. They ask you to leave. You don't. They call the cops because you're now technically trespassing on private property. You mouth off to the cops because you think you're a privileged twat, and still refuse to stop.

      So what would you think is a valid move by the company now?

    37. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think only one person is doing it? Remember iusers are sheep.

      London has 8 million people in it. Even assuming just 1 million have the shitty-battery i things and they do it once a year...

      1,000,000 * 0.1 pence = 100,000 pounds / year.

      Here, you pay this tab from your salary. Oh wait, you can't.

    38. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more than that, apparently the way those sockets work is they draw intermittent current. They rely on charge provided by the rails. Every time the rails switch power stations, they lose and suddenly regain charge. That makes the chance of fire much higher.

      And I doubt the real problem is worries about fire. The real problem is someone suing because they bricked their expensive electronic device by plugging it into an unreliable socket.

      Of course, they could fix all this by simply adding a switch that only enables the sockets when the train is parked. I.e. when the cleaners could use them safely because they have steady power.

    39. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in _very_ poor installations. In fact, if your system is that bad, you have no business exposing it to unsuspecting members of the public, because it's a death-trap.

    40. Re:Yes? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      The UK also has a standard for AFCIs and Statutory mandate for their installation: BS 7671 17th Edition (January 2008).

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    41. Re:Yes? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      most power sockets I've seen on trains (Midland Mainine (BR Class 47 for long trains, often BR Class 108 DMU for shuttle stock) and London Midland (BR Class 43), mainly, as well as Virgin Trains Class 390 Pendolinos), have been pretty well indistinguishable from standard domestic sockets.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    42. Re:Yes? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      uh... I'm not part P certified yet somehow I managed not only to compeletely rewire my garage (lighting fixture back to the fuse board plus a spur for power), I also didn't get prosecuted for doing it while uncertified. And holy shit I managed to wire my electric cooker in without burning the house down as well.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    43. Re:Yes? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      giggity.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    44. Re:Yes? by swb · · Score: 1

      I was referring to a parent poster who claimed if you charge your phone at his place of employment (a UK "public" school) you get in trouble unless you have been "authorised". That sounds ludicrous, unjustifiably authoritarian and almost impossible to enforce.

      It makes sense that the train outlets might be a bad idea given what you write about power supply issues.

      But it seems an equally bad idea to have outlets that are trivial to use (even if they require a hex key to enable) when they shouldn't be used and present any kind of fire risk to something plugged into them. IMHO, the better idea is that those "dangerous" outlets don't work at all unless the electric system is placed in some kind of service mode or the plugs are switched on from a secure panel.

      Or, better yet, make sure your electrical outlet system is insulated from changes in supply.

      Putting more-or-less working outlets someplace people can easily get at them, even with a "don't use these" sticker is a problem. Now if the sticker said "SERIOUS RISK OF FIRE OR EQUIPMENT DAMAGE -- DO NOT USE WHILE TRAIN IN MOTION" I think the train people would have a better point.

      There's a reason there's so many code requirements with electrical outlets. When they all look alike EVERYWHERE, people have an expectation that they all WORK ALIKE everywhere. If you have funky outlets that start fires or are supposed to be restricted or just plain aren't normal, you need to take more steps to make sure they aren't used, like signage that states the actual danger or serious controlled access.

    45. Re:Yes? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      and I think it's even an electrical code violation to make the socket unavailable.

      You must be kidding. You think it is a violation of the electrical code if I tell you not to plug your crap into my outlet?

      Unless you're hurting someone or breaking something, the only punishment for violating one of these "rules" should be being asked to leave, and then being detained or removed if you refuse to do so

      He was asked to stop and refused to do so.

    46. Re:Yes? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well shit there you go. But I'm not at all surprised about this. UK take electrical safety to extremes way beyond some nanny states. Their outlets are the safest design in the world, there's no assumption about cable protection with each plug individually fused, and the country has been a first mover in many regards.

      But my tongue in cheek comment was more directed at the GP who seemingly thinks that it's unlikely that electrical fires exist. Some countries solve this by regulation (Australia), some by technology (USA), some by both evidently (UK)

    47. Re:Yes? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      we try. But, it's not a foolproof system. I've had a fire caused by a desk fan exploding (yes, it exploded, nearly taking my face off). Didn't trip the AFCI or the or the main breaker but it did blow the snot out of the bus RCCD, which had to be replaced.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    48. Re:Yes? by ledow · · Score: 1

      You can argue semantics ("can do" vs "can legally do"). Fine.

      Until you sell the house and have to do those home reports. Because if it's not up to spec, or the new homeowners find this post, that's a criminal act. You can say it's as daft as you like, it's still illegal to do and can come back to bite you years later - e.g. have you noticed that high-power switches (e.g. cooker switches), terminal covers, consumer units, etc. are date-coded in most instances now? How do you go about explaining the 2015 date code on something in a house you bought before then, sold after then, and have no works receipt from a Part-P installer for? It's actually just illegal. And you can be made to pay someone registered to come in, strip it out, and do it properly, at any point.

      Fuck, if your windows aren't FENSA-registered-installer fitted and you sell your house, they will make you pay for insurance for them now (assuming your buyer is happy to accept that) unless you can provide a valid cert from an installer for them.

      We were all taught to wire plugs in school. That's the extent of the works you can legally undertake on your electrics now. It's actually part of the Building Regs now, so selling house means it can crop up and it's treating just like knocking down walls, stripping out firewalls, playing with the gas, etc.

    49. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically it's theft. You've cost the rail company money (pittance though it may be) and potentially risked a fire by plugging an unknown device into an electrical socket.

      I stopped reading here and I'm seriously hoping you're kidding. "risked a fire"? Seriously?

      I am the police. If I see you doing something I don't like and I declare you're actions could have potentially bad consequences, those imaginary consequences becomes the crime you were intending to commit. This arrest and conviction will give me job points and increased job security; and increased political power -- as anyone with an arrest record is one less person unable to constructively criticize anyone in our organisation.

      If you say anything proving you're not guilty, my career gives me the incentive to anticipate your tactical advantages in court and use it against you. Ftw, dirty citizen.

    50. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be unaware of the legal requirements for PAT testing of devices plugged in to sockets in businesses and schools the UK. If a school does suffer damage because some shitty Chinese charger is plugged in without PAT testing then the insurance may not cover them. And yes, there are plenty of shitty Chinese chargers that can cause damage.

      It probably not the same in the US, but please don't assume the sentiment is asinine or that the OP had a choice in the matter.

  15. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Etherwalk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No story here.

    Your absolutism costs lives. It locks people up who shouldn't be and follows them around for the rest of their lives. It also creates marginal deterrence problems. Proportional responses to violations of malum prohibitum "crimes" are called for. Proportional responses to malum in se crimes are even called for, but for malum prohibitum crimes there is no justification for absolutism.

    To plug your phone into the wall should not be to get arrested, unless there is a gigantic sign saying "PLUGGING INTO THIS IS PROHIBITED." Even then, it should get a $50 civil fine and nothing on your record. What's more, it *shouldn't* be prohibited unless it creates problems.

  16. Re:abstracting electricity? by TarpaKungs · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/...

    "13 Abstracting of electricity.
    A person who dishonestly uses without due authority, or dishonestly causes to be wasted or diverted, any electricity shall on conviction on indictment be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years."

    So yes, the language is precisely correct.

    Technically he has also committed a criminal offence.

    However, PCSOs (which are sometimes known unaffectionately at "plastic policemen" are non warranted police officers with very limited powers. Most of their arresting powers are actually the same as those available to any citizen (aka "citizens arrest") and have very limited conditions of applicability. PCSOs do have some additional powers specially granted:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    However, they are a modern invention and of considerably lower status, both legally and in the public perception compared to the more traditional volunteer role of "Special Constable" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    The problem here is that PCSOs generally lack common sense and seem to be power-happy. Unfortunately their warranted colleagues feel some obligation to back them up, rather than telling them to grow up, as might be applicable in cases like this.

    Unfortunately for the artist, even through he has been de-arrested, he now probably no longer qualifies for the visa waiver programme for entry to the USA as the US notion of arrest is somewhat different to the English notion and the USA as far as I know does not have a concept of "de-arrest".

    So actual harm has been done. No wonder the public perception of the police is falling like a lead balloon.

    --
    Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
  17. Meanwhile in Estonia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile in Estonia you can charge you battery on a train for free (well, after you buy the ticket).

  18. Re:He stole, he got arrested by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Police Community Support Officers have no real power. They are just ordinary people, given a stupid looking uniform and a massive chip to carry around on their shoulders. So they shove their nose in where they can, try to act like they are important and have some useful purpose.

    Best thing to do if they confront you is simply refuse to talk to them, and if possible walk away. They can't detain you. If they touch you it's assault and you can have them arrested. It's also not a bad idea to film them if they harass you, and put it on YouTube later.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  19. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Funny or not there wasn't anything untrue in his post. Cameron has stated on multiple occasions that strong encryption is aiding the enemy and that he wants government backdoors inside all encryption. The problem with that is there is an entire black-market of dedicated, intelligent people who are working to find these backdoors and sell access to them to other criminals. To think that the government could keep those backdoors a secret is naive and by weakening our encryption to ostensibly "detect terrorists" he is opening up everyone else using those weakened encryption schemes to attack by criminals.

    On topic however, I've never had a problem when traveling in the United States with charging my laptop or phone using outlets in terminals while waiting to board. If they didn't want people using them they shouldn't have put them there in the first place. If they are only for maintenance workers, lock them down and distribute the key only to personal who need access. Don't leave it open and arrest anyone who happens to think they could charge their phone there without being cited or worse.

    On the point of London being a shit-hole, I guess that's completely a matter of opinion. This isn't a shining example for the british however. Neither the officer nor the accused kept calm.

  20. Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Only government can be wrong. If any problems exist, it must be government. Therefore your post will be ignored because it tries to blame the person who is actually at fault, and it's not government.

    Because we pay government.

    Apparently these people steal all the goods they require and therefore don't pay private industry at all.

    On this actual subject, this is 100% LOL worthy and really did have me snigger because I'm thinking "WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK ELECTRICAL SOCKETS ARE FOR YOU DUMBASS!!!".

    This is 100% absolutely an asshole and the subservience to private authority by virtue of being fucking wealthy and not a problem with government, but with the slavery of the proletariat by monied power.

    And, yes, that DOES sound socialist.

    Why? Because just like government can be a problem in abusing power, power given to capital is ALSO a problem.

    1. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Informative

      On this actual subject, this is 100% LOL worthy and really did have me snigger because I'm thinking "WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK ELECTRICAL SOCKETS ARE FOR YOU DUMBASS!!!".

      They're for the cleaning staff to plug their vacuum cleaners in. They are clearly labelled "not for use by the public".

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by parenthephobia · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is this true on London Overground trains? On the trains I take in the south, the plugs are clearly labelled as only for mobile phones or laptops.

    3. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, and there was a recent incident where a cleaner was arrested for plugging his vacuum cleaner into one of those sockets.

    4. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by daedalus2097 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are non-standard sockets they should have fitted instead then, so only company authorised equipment can be plugged in. Simple and pretty much 100% effective.

      As for the cost, it was probably far less than 10p, especially considering the enormous bulk discounts someone like TFL will get when purchasing their electricity. Sometimes publicity about wasting electricity by leaving chargers plugged in or equipment on standby can make people believe these things guzzle power. Bottom line, it would be impossible to measure the difference in power usage between two train journeys that was caused by someone plugging in a charger.

    5. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Depends on the operator and rolling stock. Southern Rail don't have sockets for the public (they have them by the doors for the cleaning crew) but I've seen passengers using them. South West Trains do have them, as do some Thameslink stock.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    6. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      You are expecting them to use their brains. Why do that when we can have people arrested for something really stupid.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sockets all used to be non-standard. I wonder if this has changed, or if he found a standard socket that had been installed for some other piece of equipment.

    8. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by jittles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are non-standard sockets they should have fitted instead then, so only company authorised equipment can be plugged in. Simple and pretty much 100% effective.

      As for the cost, it was probably far less than 10p, especially considering the enormous bulk discounts someone like TFL will get when purchasing their electricity. Sometimes publicity about wasting electricity by leaving chargers plugged in or equipment on standby can make people believe these things guzzle power. Bottom line, it would be impossible to measure the difference in power usage between two train journeys that was caused by someone plugging in a charger.

      So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK? I mean, don't get me wrong, I think this is a silly reason to prosecute anyone, but the cost of a nonstandard plug is far in excess of a few pence. They have to have them manufactured, shipped and installed in all of their locations and then there is the conundrum of plugging the equipment in, too. Do they order vacuums with special plugs? Replace the plugs on COTS vacuums? Have adapters manufactured? And then what is to stop some conniving Brit from stealing an adapter or making their own adapter? It's just silly. Arresting someone for this is just silly. The officer should have just given him a warning, perhaps even a written warning so they can track repeat offenders. Life should have continued on. But the guy made a huge mistake if he really did become aggressive after they decided to arrest him, as that is a serious crime in most jurisdictions.

    9. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by shitzu · · Score: 1

      Why do they not switch it off from the fusebox if they are not meant to be used anyway?

    10. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by shitzu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      switch them off from the fusebox while not in use by the cleaning crew - costs nothing and is also safer

    11. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK?

      Actually, I think a better policy would be "Need to charge your phone while you're on the train? Use our outlets!" It would be a good PR move for them and help build goodwill.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    12. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or just label them. One of the things that mtr in Hongkong does well is put ample warnings up about what can lead to fines. And it's not all obvious.

    13. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      You are probably thinking of "Walsall Gauge" 13A sockets beloved by the BBC or the T-bar-earth type that are quite common in communal areas in flats.

      No - modern trains, at least all the ones I am familiar with tend to have regular 13A sockets. On the Class 375 Electrostars, these are 1 per vestibule and are usually marked "Not for public use" or similar.

      Now, London Routemaster buses, in the days before fluorescent lighting, used funny voltage bulbs to deter people from nicking them.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    14. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by TarpaKungs · · Score: 2

      That's assuming there is a dedicated 240V line that runs through the train from cab to cab with a single breaker.

      More likely there will be a breaker in each carriage or at least each unit (set of permanently joined carriages) - and this is likely to be in some cupboard rather that with the critical system breakers in the cab. So doing this will involve a certain amount of faff.

      Yes, I guess they could have designed a computer initiated isolator on the socket circuits, but someone probably said "what's the point?"

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    15. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      I refer the honourable gentleman to my post above :)

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    16. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and then some asshole would ruin it for everyone by driving his Smart ED inside the train to charge it.

    17. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by shitzu · · Score: 1

      The fusebox is probably in the same cupboard the cleaning lady keeps her vacuum in...

    18. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by mysidia · · Score: 0, Troll

      If they're not for use by the public, then they should not be visible from public space, or the receptacle should be enclosed in a box that has to be lifted or opened for access. Simply attaching a label or sign to a publicly visible receptacle is not sufficient, since people won't notice the sign, and the receptacle itself is basically a universal sign for power available.

    19. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

      "There are non-standard sockets they should have fitted instead then, so only company authorised equipment can be plugged in."

      In fact, non-standard electrical sockets were the 'standard' in Britain until the EU came along and set actual standards for everything. When you bought an appliance in the old days, it came without a plug. You then had to scrounge separately for a plug that fitted the sockets in your particular home.

    20. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by mysidia · · Score: 1

      So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK?

      If the citizens of the UK are being decent about it and only drawing a few milliamps, then they should just allow them to do it, As long as they are not plugging in an outlet splitter or a high-wattage appliance such as a Hair dryer or Coffee pot, there is no material power draw....

      Or else provide some coin-op power outlets and a keyswitch for staff use.

    21. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On this actual subject, this is 100% LOL worthy and really did have me snigger because I'm thinking "WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK ELECTRICAL SOCKETS ARE FOR YOU DUMBASS!!!".

      They're for the cleaning staff to plug their vacuum cleaners in. They are clearly labelled "not for use by the public".

      There's an easier way: turn on those outlets only when it's time to clean the cars.

    22. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by timholman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK? I mean, don't get me wrong, I think this is a silly reason to prosecute anyone, but the cost of a nonstandard plug is far in excess of a few pence. They have to have them manufactured, shipped and installed in all of their locations and then there is the conundrum of plugging the equipment in, too. Do they order vacuums with special plugs? Replace the plugs on COTS vacuums? Have adapters manufactured? And then what is to stop some conniving Brit from stealing an adapter or making their own adapter? It's just silly.

      The best engineering is the type of engineering that prevents people from doing the wrong thing with minimum expense. Using non-standard plugs and outlets is bad engineering; it requires costly ongoing retro-fitting as new cleaning equipment is purchased, and even then passengers might be tempted to tamper with a "live" electrical outlet in an attempt to make it work with their chargers.

      But I would assume that the cleaners are not going to be cleaning the train while it is in service, correct? So, you have a master electrical switch in the train for "operational" and "maintenance" modes. When the train is being cleaned, it is placed in maintenance mode, and the power outlets are live. When the train is in operational mode, the outlets are disconnected. Very quickly the passengers learn that the outlets don't work. Problem solved.

    23. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's actually a simpler way to prevent public use of these outlets, locked covers.

    24. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

      Just use the sockets from a different country. They can be bougt in bulk, with adapters, and you can trust that the average train passenger won't have or won't be arsed to figure out what country it is and buy an adapter.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    25. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good PR? Letting people charge their phones with your outlets is not "good PR". It's EXPECTED PR. NOT letting someone charge their phone with your outlets is bad PR.

    26. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by dave420 · · Score: 2

      It was BS 1363 (introduced in 1947) which standardised the plugs, not the EU.

    27. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK?

      No need to develop a new plug, just use a round-pin plug

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    28. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by sjames · · Score: 1

      More likely, a standard industrial plug could be used. For example, a twist lock. Standard enough to be available at a well stocked hardware store, but not likely something a passenger would have an adapter for.

    29. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radical idea: turn off the electricity to the plugs and give the Cleaners battery powered equipment.

    30. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it cost 1p, they're paying too much for electricity!

    31. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have customized nonstandard plugs and full support for their use as a part of normal commercial ventures for exactly this reason. Many business have non-standard outlets for exactly this type of reason. It's perfectly common.

    32. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      If the socket fits...

    33. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't replace the plug then, put a hatch over it. Most people are accustomed to protecting their property with doors and keys, no need to make the doorway circular.

    34. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the cost of a nonstandard plug is far in excess of a few pence. They have to have them manufactured, shipped and installed in all of their locations and then there is the conundrum of plugging the equipment in, too. Do they order vacuums with special plugs? Replace the plugs on COTS vacuums? Have adapters manufactured?

      OK, then what about using the *standard* ones we use in the rest of Europe? Problem solved.

    35. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are non-standard sockets they should have fitted instead then, so only company authorised equipment can be plugged in. Simple and pretty much 100% effective.

      Or they could just put the sockets on a switch. The cleaners flip the switch on when they want to run their vacuums. The rest of the time the sockets are dead. Even simpler and doesn't require cleaners with special plugs.

    36. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a wide array of precedent for having a "maintenance mode" switch on the carriage, which would power up the outlets, and enable access to any other accessories the cleaning crew might need. There are even systems with multiple modes, so that the cleaning crew can't access the hydraulics for the brakes, for example.

      Frankly, I'd be surprised if there isn't already something like that on these carriages...

    37. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      They have to have them manufactured, shipped and installed in all of their locations and then there is the conundrum of plugging the equipment in, too. Do they order vacuums with special plugs? Replace the plugs on COTS vacuums?

      Actually, until recently, most appliances in the UK were terminated in pigtails. You had to buy your own UK plug and wire it up yourself. (And it was taught in school how to wire a plug properly).

      So technically, the COTS appliance would do absolutely squat since the line cord is provided as a pigtail anyways.

      And while yes, you may need to "develop" a plug, there actually are plenty of existing plugs - using Australian plugs would suffice - the voltage and frequency is the same, and the angled pins would foil it. Or use one of the many North American ones (I think we have spinning locking ones that work at 240V that won't fit a standard 2 prong plug).

      Then again, they are rather proud of their plug. And their ability to wire a plug.

    38. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! I can't believe this conversation continued THIS long about dumb custom plugs before someone realized "Oh wait, we can just put a locked cover on it and give the keys to the maintenance staff. Heck, they could even retrofit those with USB ports to allow people to charge only small devices. All the problems solved and everyone's happy.

    39. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If they're not for use by the public, then they should not be visible from public space, or the receptacle should be enclosed in a box that has to be lifted or opened for access. Simply attaching a label or sign to a publicly visible receptacle is not sufficient, since people won't notice the sign, and the receptacle itself is basically a universal sign for power available.

      And what about people who cannot read the sign, due to a language barrier, or are illiterate? What good does a sign do then?

      I was told that having a "Beware of Dog" sign was no protection against being sued if my dog bit someone, even in my fenced yard, due to the same reasoning.

    40. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK?

      Yes. Appropriate behavior by design instead of by inspection, standard six sigma improvement. It wouldn't even have to be a "non-standard" plug, just one that doesn't match retail plugs. There are plenty of alternate plug designs already.

    41. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      ... well if you didn't want to redesign everything, you could you know, have a custom outlet and a custom extension/converter back to the normal plug you're used to. That way you don't need specialized equipment manufactured to use it.
      Or you could put it under lock and key.
      Or you could put a switch which energizes the outlet.
      Or put the outlet on a timer in which it's only energized when the cleaning crew is scheduled to use it.
      There are literally hundreds of easy to do schemes which don't rely on the kindness of people to function correctly.
      I am not a lawyer, but it kind of sounds like the law he was charged with (or accused of) was really meant to stop people from stealing service for their entire household by installing a faulty meter or some sort of meter bypass device. It wasn't meant to stop people from using cents of electricity. Unless of course up to 5 years sounds like a reasonable punishment for that kind of crime.

    42. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying Beware of the Leopard.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    43. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's England. Americans expect bad service and all sorts of stupid rules when they go to England. It's like being in France, only the people who don't work in customer service are slightly nicer in England. God, Europe made me crave a nice, American DMV.

    44. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't see why they don't have charging sockets on trains
        Buses in the UK have free Wifi and charging sockets to charge your laptop, tablet or mobile phone.

      Running low on power?

      Coast & Country, Cobalt Clipper, Fab 56, Red Kite 45 & 46, TEN and Tyne Tees Xpress buses also have power sockets to charge your mobile or tablet!

      http://www.simplygo.com/wi-fi-on-bus/

    45. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Besides, the security guard or whatever she was needs some validation in her life, and making a stink about a few shillings of electricity and seeing the perp arrested probably made her feel all warm and fuzzy on the walk home to her studio flat and 13 cats.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    46. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK?

      Wait, we ARE talking about charging an iphone?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    47. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      And here I was going to write that the warning was on display in the Planning Office in Alpha Centauri, but you beat me to it.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    48. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression Jeremy Clarkson no longer did Top Gear?

    49. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire point of general automation is to spend a bit more money up front to remove the human (and sometimes very dumb human) element from a process. In the long run it saves money overall and prevents stupid issues like this one from happening. To me, pretty simple thing that really isn't that expensive especially if it is designed up front. Retrofitting there is a bit of cost, but what do you want to bet someone is already talking about it within the organization now? I'm sure it happens more than people think, this one is just getting attention because someone actually yelled at the guy and he ended up getting arrested for it.

    50. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      no, we've had the best design of plug in the world ever since 1947. What you're confusing is the issue that only very recently the EU stepped in and mandated that every appliance sold shall have either a fixed lead with a moulded plug to BS1363 or a flylead fitted with a BS1363 plug. Bumped the margin of every single appliance which required a flylead down by something like three quid. Doesn't sound like much, but imagine if you're an indie computer shop owner having to supply two or three thousand of the things a year at cost to yourself.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    51. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by maorb · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think a better policy would be "Need to charge your phone while you're on the train? Use our outlets!" It would be a good PR move for them and help build goodwill.

      The article does mention that the outlets may be prone to surges when the train switches from one substation to another. Although the source for this concern was from the forums, and not an official voice from the London Overground, if that concern has any truth behind it then allowing people to plug in their sensitive electronics could actually be a very stupid policy.

    52. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by jittles · · Score: 1

      > So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug rather than trust in the honesty and decency of the citizens of the UK?

      Wait, we ARE talking about charging an iphone?

      Yes. But the plug did indicate that it was not for public use. Unless it was extremely urgent, you would expect a normal citizen to respect that request, I would hope.

    53. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Or put a locked cover on them that the cleaning staff has a key to open or knows the combination to open.

    54. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      So you think it is far more appropriate for them to have to develop a nonstandard plug...

      Wait. This is the UK right? Aren't they already using nonstandard plugs?

    55. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by tsa · · Score: 1

      My god, someone is seriously reacting to that.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    56. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by tibit · · Score: 1

      it was probably far less than 10p

      10Whr is about as much as you need at the outlet to fully charge an iPhone 5s, and that will cost about 0.1 pence worst case at industrial rates in London. 1 millipound.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    57. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by tibit · · Score: 1

      The best engineering is the type of engineering that realizes that the scale of the problem is such that even having anyone qualified think long enough about the solution will cost more than the yearly "losses" due to the problem not being solved. The cost, to fully recharge (from flat battery) 1000 iPhones is about 1 pound. That's a very conservative figure. I don't know how many outlets are there for them to worry about, but even if a million phones get fully recharged per year that way, we're still talking about amounts that are, for a major rail operator, not unlike rounding errors. What's 1,000 pounds yearly of extra electricity cost for them? Nothing.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    58. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by tibit · · Score: 1

      1 per vestibule

      Given 3 hours per charge time of iPhone 5s, and 0.1 pence cost of doing so, we have a daily cost, at full utilization, of 0.008 GBP per vestibule per day. Assuming 2 vestibules per car, and a car in constant operation, with the outlet constantly occupied by a charger, we're looking at a cost of roughly 5.84GBP per car per year. Given the overall car maintenance and railway operation costs, that's noise not worth paying any attention to.

      Any "solution" to this imaginary "problem" will cost more than this. Even having someone qualified write a report as to why a solution is unnecessary will cost more than the yearly cost of electricity here.

      TL;DR: Making a problem out of this makes one look very, very dumb.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    59. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by bughunter · · Score: 1

      He probably didn't get "aggressive" just got pissed off. I'd wager money he never once used a threatening word or gesture, that he merely expressed outrage, like any of us would. This then becomes inflated into "unacceptable behavior." I've seen it over and over again:

      1) Individual attracts attention of police for something innocuous, like having too much melanin, excess hair, non-conformist attire, etc.

      2) Law Enforcement Authority (LEA, either public officer or private security) observes individual and waits for them to do something objectionable, however minor (broken taillight, liberating electricity, sitting on sidewalk).

      3) LEA then has something they can inflate into "probable cause" or "reasonable suspicion" to detain or arrest individual. Any witnesses at trial will be posed a question whose honest answer will uphold the LEA's account of the incident.

      4) Individual has expected reaction, namely, becomes outraged that they were selectively enforced.

      5) Individual expresses outrage, either verbally or gesturally. No explicit threat is needed, just behavior other than calm subservience.

      6) LEA then has something they can inflate into "aggressive behavior," "resisting arrest," or even "fear for the safety of myself or others." Again, any witnesses at trial will be posed a question whose honest answer will uphold the LEA's account of the incident.

      7) Individual then goes to jail, often after being physically beaten. The likelihood of the beating is directly proportional to the melanin concentration / length of hair / degree of nonconformity present at phase 1).

      Phase 5 is where most people screw up. In police states like the US and UK are becoming, the police get very offended if you don't respect their ahthoritah. Even talking back can get you beaten and thrown in jail, especially if your melanin concentrations are too high.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    60. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this not depend on the location of the socket, ones I've seen that have had a "not for public use" sign on were also next to the doors, there is a potential safety issue with letting people use those sockets.

      And also if these sockets aren't designed to provide stable power while the train is moving, encouraging people to plug things into them when they could get damaged may in fact not be good PR.

    61. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't require refitting if they only produced plug adapters that took a normal plug and converted it to their train's system.

    62. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

      According to a local commenting to the original article "... sockets on these trains are scarce, out of the way, with signs that clearly warn you not to use them. I travel on the overground frequently and I've never seen anyone doing it. The guy messed up, and rather than accept it and apologise when he was caught, he makes a big fuss and gets himself arrested. I'm sure everyone involved had better things to doâ¦"

    63. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are non-standard sockets they should have fitted instead then, so only company authorised equipment can be plugged in.

      It was in the UK. All sockets there are non-standard.

    64. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by rezme · · Score: 1

      You must acquit?

    65. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by dysmal · · Score: 1

      It would somehow be their fault if he got his Smart ED stuck while trying too since there's no sign that explicitly says DO NOT CHARGE YOUR CAR HERE.

    66. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      You must acquit?

      Dammit OJ! Could you just stop it with the bullshit excuses already? What's our tee time btw?

    67. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by StenD · · Score: 1

      There are non-standard sockets they should have fitted instead then, so only company authorised equipment can be plugged in.

      You take product off of the tables at sidewalk sales and walk off with it without paying, don't you? After all, if they didn't want you to take it, they should have kept it inside the store where you had to go through the register stand, right?

    68. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by mshor · · Score: 1

      In the days when incandescent bulbs were used in the NY Subway System and they were uncovered, the bulbs had a reverse thread making them useless to consumers.

    69. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Why would the EU do that, when BS1363 is almost exclusively used in UK,Ireland?
      http://www.worldstandards.eu/e...

    70. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all buses in the UK have power sockets and wifi, I'm sure most of the ones in London don't. And some trains do have plug sockets (and wifi) for passengers. It just happens that this train didn't have plug sockets for passengers.

    71. Re:Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all fine, but the trains don't apparently get cleaned so apparently the plugs aren't for the cleaners.

    72. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no wonder the Barons wanted a Magna Carta

    73. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by kenh · · Score: 1

      If the railway 'encourages' the use of their power sockets, they could've held liable when a surge fries your device, forcing the Railway to slog through endless complaints and suits for damages, etc.

      By labeling the outlets as 'not for use by the public' it neatly avoids all responsibility.

      By having a member of 'public' arrested for using said outlets despite clear instructions not to is non-sensical. I doubt it really is against the law in any specific way, more of a 'derived offense' cooked up in the mind of a private security guard.

      --
      Ken
    74. Re: Your post doesn't conform to their prejudice by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      they mandated the plug, the British Government specified the type according to the 1363 standard in making the statutory instrument to conform to the EU Directive.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  21. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do folks from FBI. As do other intelligence agencies.

    Did you have a point, or are you here just to throw dirt at one state and ignore everyone else?

  22. Switzerland by AdeBaumann · · Score: 1

    I do it all the time on Swiss trains. Then again, if they put a socket above every seat (on modern trains at least), I somehow expect they won't mind.

    --
    I gave up sigs almost a year ago.
    1. Re:Switzerland by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Denis, is that you? :-)

      Indeed. Same on some French TGVs. They have sockets for the express purpose of letting passengers charge their phones or use their laptops. It's crazy how you can get arrested in London for doing something which elsewhere is allowed and expected.

      But to the PCSO's defense: apparently the socket was marked "do not use". Still a mystery why it was even turned on, if it was only for the cleaners' use while the train was stopped...

    2. Re:Switzerland by squizzar · · Score: 1

      And most long distance trains in the UK. They of course have a sign saying "For laptops and mobile phones only" or similar, instead of "Not for public use" like the train this fool was on.

    3. Re:Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many German trains have sockets between the seats. They're not marked anything but it's clear that they're for passenger use. I don't think "abstracting" a few watts from an electric train is even measurable as a cost factor. But if they're worried about people plugging in their electric heaters they could just provide USB sockets for charging instead.
      Side note: is it a crime if I charge my phone on one of those sockets that are marked "razors only"? And what's special about a razor?

    4. Re: Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switzerland is a modern, democratic free country. Unlike the UK. The Swiss have demonstrated time and again that they cherish their freedom and independence and they want to be treated as adult, responsible and free citizens. Unlike the British.

    5. Re:Switzerland by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But to the PCSO's defense: apparently the socket was marked "do not use". Still a mystery why it was even turned on, if it was only for the cleaners' use while the train was stopped...

      Would it make you happier if they put a lock on it that only cleaners had the key to?

      Some things in a civilised society work on a co-operative basis. There are unspoken rules (e.g. I won't come round to your house and take a dump on your front doorstep). There are written rules (e.g. please do not walk on the grass signs). Finally, there are actual laws for those who refuse to behave sociably.

      The guy in this article sounds like an entitled dickhead, although I suppose it's possible he's legally blind or dyslexic or something. But I think that would have been mentioned.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Switzerland by MorePower · · Score: 1

      One of the "unspoken rules" of society though is that any outlet exposed in a public place is fair game. And some of the "actual laws" cover the fact that any outlet must be safe to plug into, and any device sold must be standards compliant to safely plug into any compatable outlet. Seriously, the outlets aren't safe to plug into when the train is moving? Why the hell are they on and available? Someone with bad eyesight, or illiterate, or not English-speaking, or seriously drunk could be plugging in. It should be an electrical code violation to have a socket that isn't safe for any (standards compliant) plug to connect to.

  23. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Artist" with entitlement complex uses power socket on train clearly marked as "Cleaners only, not for public use".
    Authorised authority requests that he stops using the socket, reminding him that it is illegal theft of service.

    With any normal person this situation would have ended here. Guy behaves like a prat because he's entitled.
    At the train pulls into the next station there's police officers standing around, and authorised authority requests assistance.

    Guy is arrested under suspicion of theft of service due to statement by authorised authority. (Note, disobeying a reasonable direction by an authorised authority is an offence by itself, but that wasn't pursued). Guy continues to behave like an entitled prat.

    Police decide not to press ahead theft of service and instead charge him with a anti-social behaviour offence (which can cover both the electricity theft and the behaviour towards the authorised authority). This charge is a relatively minor offence covered by fixed fines (or exclusion orders), similar to a parking or speeding fine. This reduces the overhead and cost on the justice system having to deal with this prat.

    The police and authorised authority appeared to act in a reasonable manner. The only unreasonable person is the "artist" that ignored a clear sign, stole service, then had the cheek to get aggressive when asked to stop.

  24. UK is insane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Insane. Here in sweden we have a socket or two by every seat on the bigger trains, like the one going between Copenhagen and Stockholm. And even on the smaller ones you're totally free to use any sockets found in the public area of the train.

    1. Re:UK is insane! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      London Overground is suburban rail, not a long distance service. You will get recharge points on the trains between cities (at least on some of them)

    2. Re:UK is insane! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Insane. Here in sweden we have a socket or two by every seat on the bigger trains, like the one going between Copenhagen and Stockholm. And even on the smaller ones you're totally free to use any sockets found in the public area of the train.

      On the debit side, your idea of a sandwich only has one slice of bread. So I'd say that culturally it's a tie.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  25. Re:He stole, he got arrested by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

    I think his point was quite clear in the very first sentance.

    Funny or not there wasn't anything untrue in his post.

    "It's funny cos it's true"

    He just put more effort into describing why.

  26. Too Many Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, there are too many police.

    The original intention of 'protect and serve' seems now to be to 'bully, control and dominate'

  27. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't be too sure about that: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/117572/pcso-powers.pdf

  28. Re:He stole, he got arrested by amalcolm · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not so powerless as you might think: https://www.gov.uk/government/... [www.gov.uk] In this case, she simply alerted 'real' police officers to the 'offence'. If the guy had not bercome aggressive I expect he would have been sent on his way.

    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
  29. Re: He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and then maybe he'll actually read the article, which states that there actually was a sign (as well as an explanation for why it's prohibited), and realize that he should feel foolish. Probably not, though; this is Slashdot, where facts get in the way of a good, solid, knee-jerk reaction.

  30. Re: He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a sign which says words to the effect of "Not for public use, for use of train company staff only." It then goes on to say it's not a regulated power supply and you may well blow anything apart that you plug in to it.

  31. So what you are essentially saying... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    the police man was just enforcing the laws written by the legislature. He was just doing the job he was supposed to be doing.

    So what you are essentially saying... is that he was "just following orders".

    Too soon in the comments?

    1. Re:So what you are essentially saying... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      the police man was just enforcing the laws written by the legislature. He was just doing the job he was supposed to be doing.

      So what you are essentially saying... is that he was "just following orders".

      Too soon in the comments?

      You forgot the *removes sunglasses* bit.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:So what you are essentially saying... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Following orders while being on losing side can and usually have bad consequences. when at the same time following orders while on the winning side is OK.
      Predicting which side is going to win is difficult at times and people may have no choice either.
      As for juice thief - there are trains where taking juice out of the train's outlet is OK - in continental EU it is. Sometimes there is no juice there for a passenger to have (the few Polish trains I used did not have it as a matter of principle, Germans usually have some, did not check Dutch and Swedish I used). I would assume putting a nice plague on it 'not for public use' has been done but then again I think in this day and age you could even turn off single socket from the train if you wanted to so having socket meant for maintenance (I assume that it was one) juiced as per specs while passengers are there and then getting angry was silly and mean. The guying being a fanboi was probably a big asshat so this was one of those situations where it had to escalate.

    3. Re:So what you are essentially saying... by weilawei · · Score: 1

      I would assume putting a nice plague on it 'not for public use' has been done

      I thought we all agreed not to engage in biological warfare?

    4. Re:So what you are essentially saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      godwins free to evolve just like the rest

    5. Re:So what you are essentially saying... by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      ... yes throw the fucker in a gas chamber.

      wait, was that not what the end result of this is?

      wait... was i making an flagrantly hyperbolic comparison?

  32. Re:He stole, he got arrested by teslar · · Score: 4, Informative

    To plug your phone into the wall should not be to get arrested, unless there is a gigantic sign saying "PLUGGING INTO THIS IS PROHIBITED." [...] What's more, it *shouldn't* be prohibited unless it creates problems.

    You do realise that this is exactly how it was, right? There was a sign, and it exists because plugging in might damage your equipment. From TFA:

    Electricity sockets on Overground trains are clearly marked with the words: âoecleaners use only and not for public useâ.

    On a forum dedicated to the London Underground, members have pointed out that plug sockets on the trains are for cleaning equipment deployed when trains are in depots. They recommend not charging electronic equipment as there is a risk of power surge: âoeIf something was directly plugged into it (for example a standard computer, or a laptop without a battery in) the equipment would probably be damaged at any section gaps where the power supply changes from one substation to another!â

  33. Hear, hear! by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Language consists not of what is written in reference books, that is a mere snapshot of language use. Language is what is in daily use.

    Hear, hear!

    It's a perfectly cromulent use of the word!

  34. Re:He stole, he got arrested by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

    "unless there is a gigantic sign saying "PLUGGING INTO THIS IS PROHIBITED"

    From the linked article:

    "Electricity sockets on Overground trains are clearly marked with the words: “cleaners use only and not for public use”

  35. Really?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, you got to hand it to the police community support officer, she must have been bored or maybe, just maybe she is the hero and saved the tax payer from paying 0.003 pennies in electricity.

  36. Re: He stole, he got arrested by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    Silly. Reading the article doesn't change my position; like I said, even in that case, a civil fine and not an arrest is the most that is justified. And then maybe you'll read to the next sentence of my comment, which covered that case.

    Why would I read TFA when I can just put a default case at the bottom of my switch statement? :)

  37. The bigger problem here is the bureaucracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company/government department could've put in charging booths that charge (heh) a nominal fee for service. It's not hard, hell, it's already being done at airports, entertainment centres and other large, public-access areas.

    They're no different to a vending machine or those storage locker things, just plop your money in, open the little door, plug your phone in to one of the range of mini/micro/apple chargers and wait. 20c (~10p?) For 10 minutes, $1/hour. Simple, sorted.

    This would:
    - Solve the problem of 'leeching' power
    - Bring in some revenue
    - Make stories like this a non-issue.

  38. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    "unless there is a gigantic sign saying "PLUGGING INTO THIS IS PROHIBITED"

    From the linked article:

    "Electricity sockets on Overground trains are clearly marked with the words: “cleaners use only and not for public use”

    Thank you! That makes it less absurd to punish him, although I still think a civil fine is more appropriate than an arrest.

  39. Attractive nuissance by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Attractive nuissance.

    If they didn't want people using the outlets, they'd either omit them, or use an outlet/plug design that was incompatible with standard plugs, and there wouldn't be a problem. It's not like the vacuum cleaners are being taken home and used by the transit staff, so a permanent modification wouldn't be a problem.

  40. Sure... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Yeah ofcourse he was arrested only for using the socket........... He propably was told it was illegal to use the socket and was written a fine, but then he got a big mouth and that's why he got arrested, and trying to arrest him he got even agressive and that was the second offence.. There are always 2 sides to the story, and ofcourse according to him, he did nothing and only used the outlet...

    Then again, why don't they just replace the socket with a plug that isn't compatible with any consumer plug... But people are getting more bold/rude and think they can just charge their device anywhere without permission.. I've seen it a lot in bars etc, people just unplugging an appliance or light just to charge their f-ing phone and not even putting the plug back in, and all without asking..

  41. Power on train port of the service in Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god I live in Switzerland. Power sockets are seen as part of the service on the federal railway and are even available in the 2nd class coaches.

  42. Re:He stole, he got arrested by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    London isn't actually a separate country yet, though most of the rest of the UK wishes that it was.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  43. Re:He stole, he got arrested by abies · · Score: 1

    In UK, "You can't do that here, Sir!" said in proper voice should be a lot more embarassing to perpetrator than being handcuffed in public...

  44. what the fuck, slashdot by gTsiros · · Score: 1

    from the flamebaid title to the idiotic tags, this is an absolutely shitty submission, through and through

    Is this slashdot anymore?

    Who the hell accepted this submission? samzenpus? Go gargle some brake fluid.

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
  45. Small 5W USB was recalled as a fire hazard by perpenso · · Score: 4, Informative

    Technically it's theft. You've cost the rail company money (pittance though it may be) and potentially risked a fire by plugging an unknown device into an electrical socket.

    I stopped reading here and I'm seriously hoping you're kidding. "risked a fire"? Seriously?

    Apple recalled millions of their original iPhone/iPod touch chargers. The small 5W USB adapter, they were a fire hazard. They still use the design, last I checked they still put the little green dot on them that differentiated the later safer models from the original hazardous models.

    1. Re:Small 5W USB was recalled as a fire hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were two recalls, neither was directly a fire risk.

      The euro charger out overheat. That's it; no fire risk. Maybe your cable would run hot and fail prematurely, but there is only 5v/1A running through it. Maybe it become uncomfortably to hot to handle, but it would not burn you.

      The US adapter was NOT a fire hazard itself. The risk was that the prongs could be broken-off, which in turn in theory could cause a fire hazard if you then tried to remove the broken prog with something conductive, (like pliers,) while also somehow grounding yourself.

      Also, technically it may, or may not be theft, but again we are talking about $0.01 USD. That is less then then 0.0064 of a Pound.

    2. Re:Small 5W USB was recalled as a fire hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, technically it may, or may not be theft, but again we are talking about $0.01 USD. That is less then then 0.0064 of a Pound.

      True, but the arrest most likely occurred because of the posted sign saying this plus is not for you and when the officer pointed out the sign the person decided to ignore the officer and continue charging. Failure to comply with a lawful instruction from a peace officer usually ends badly.

    3. Re:Small 5W USB was recalled as a fire hazard by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      My original xbox had a power line recall. They shipped out a new one with something like a GFCI built into it.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Small 5W USB was recalled as a fire hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the re-packagers now helpfully add that dot to the old models they sell as well.

  46. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

    It's really just a matter of putting a sign above it saying "For staff use only" or similar. Then, you can at least say you told them before you arrest them.

    --
    A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
  47. Dickwads at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir are an intolerant dickwad.

    It uses a tiny amount of electricity, yet you threaten them with arrest? If they turned on the lights would you arrest them? If they used the toilet without asking first arrest? How about you just LIGHTEN UP and quit being such a jobsworth!

    "And I'm not talking tiny state schools, but large independent (private) schools where pissing off a parent costs you more money than you earn in a year if they pull their kids out. But still we don't let them do it."

    Do you think it would be acceptable in a cheap public school?? That makes no difference, its a minor thing, like walking in the wrong door, or not 'standing on the right' on an escalator, don't revel in being such a dick, because people treating each other as dicks over minor things make life a PITA. You make life a PITA.

    1. Re:Dickwads at work by squizzar · · Score: 1

      I think the dickwad was the guy who got himself arrested for being exactly that. Unplug your device, PCSO leaves, plug it back in if you want to be a rebel. Get the arse with someone who's doing their (voluntary) job? Are you so behind that you don't see how the whole meeting aggression with more aggression thing doesn't actually pan out very well...

  48. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To plug your phone into the wall should not be to get arrested, unless there is a gigantic sign saying "PLUGGING INTO THIS IS PROHIBITED."

    Well, there generally *is* a notice on the socket saying that it is not for public use.

    Even then, it should get a $50 civil fine and nothing on your record.

    If there was a fine, it would probably be denomiated in British Pounds.

    What's more, it *shouldn't* be prohibited unless it creates problems.

    In fact, it does create problems, although mainly for the user. The socket is intended for use by the cleaning staff when the train is stationary in the depot and connected to a fixed power source. When the train in motion, the power supply to the socket comes directly from the power coming into the train from the overhead cables or third rail; it is massively variable, with sufficiently large drop-offs and spikes that it could seriously damage equipment like phones or laptops that are plugged into it.

    So in case any of you were thinking of following this guy's example, you might want to reconsider.

  49. Re:He stole, he got arrested by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    Thank you! That makes it less absurd to punish him, although I still think a civil fine is more appropriate than an arrest.

    I think that is what happened, from the wording of the summary he didn't get arrested until he started acting crazy about it; thus getting arrested for "unacceptable behaviour".

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  50. Re:Tax dollars^H^H^H^H^H^H^HH^ pounds at work. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Ahem Let's spend thousands of pounds over 6 pence worth of electricity

  51. Re:He stole, he got arrested by digitig · · Score: 2

    Read the article. There is a sign on it saying it's for staff use only. It's also a very bad idea to use it when the train is in motion, as it can get massive power surges as the train crosses from one power zone to another.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  52. Meanwhile in Germany by jaklode · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, in Germany, most trains include power sockets precisely so passengers can charge their laptops/phones/whatever.

    1. Re:Meanwhile in Germany by dave420 · · Score: 1

      This is an overground train, more similar to an S-Bahn or Regiobahn than an IC or ICE.

    2. Re:Meanwhile in Germany by Quantum+gravity · · Score: 1

      And new buses in Stockholm have USB sockets for charging mobiles, as well as some Swebus buses between Stockholm and Oslo and between other cities. I expect that USB ports with free electricity will become more common on public transport.

    3. Re:Meanwhile in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, in Germany, most trains include power sockets precisely so passengers can charge their laptops/phones/whatever.

      Two world wars and one world cup, doo dah, doo dah.

  53. These would be... by GoddersUK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These would be the sockets that say "not for public use" on them. The sockets that are provided for the cleaners to plug their vacuum cleaners into and, if used when the train is operating, could be subjected to power spikes and liable to fry your electronics and cause a fire? Yeah, I have no sympathy. I don't doubt the police could be doing better things (although I'm no engineer, if this really does pose a serious safety risk, perhaps it is a good use of their time) but when you're on someone else's train you play by someone else's rules. If that means not using the sockets, so be it.

    1. Re:These would be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so basically, by having a huge socket with not-up-to code wiring due to the unregulated current and or voltage
      a even huger label the train operator has created what's known in the us as an "attractive nuisance", and would
      be liable for any harm coming from its use. furthermore, being not up to code, the outlets would either have to
      be removed or brought up to code. either way, a fine would be due.

       

    2. Re:These would be... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The charger was being used on a train, not a building and the worry was about the device catching fire, not the outlet or it's wiring. And "up to code" is also a common mistake people make as no building is ever "up to code". Building codes do not apply to train cars or RV's or anything anyone ever creates that is not part of a building, heck some buildings are not even covered by building code (depending on your jurisdiction that could be anything from porches, garages, additions etc).

      A huge socket that isn't yours and is labeled "do not use" could have anything on it. If I build a device that uses a regular outlet socket I could provide 1000V/20A DC on it. It would fry your phone and your phone would start a fire or electrocute you, not the wiring nor the outlet.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:These would be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These would be the sockets that say "not for public use" on them. The sockets that are provided for the cleaners to plug their vacuum cleaners into and, if used when the train is operating, could be subjected to power spikes and liable to fry your electronics and cause a fire? Yeah, I have no sympathy. I don't doubt the police could be doing better things (although I'm no engineer, if this really does pose a serious safety risk, perhaps it is a good use of their time) but when you're on someone else's train you play by someone else's rules. If that means not using the sockets, so be it.

      In all fairness in that picture there's nothing on the socket at all. It looks more like that bit of wall is not for public use. Shall we extend it to the whole carriage?

      Is there a "Beware of the leopard" sign around the corner?

  54. I work in public schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a fucking epidemic where I work. Kids have 0 respect for anything especially school property so they will just unplug anything and plug their fucking phone in and then when they leave just leave shit unplugged when they're done.

    They also think every computer is a charging station and that it's perfectly okay to have their phone out and using it 24/7. It's technically against the rules but they're not enforced because literally every single kid has one and administrators gave up. They're all on free lunch (supposedly because of poverty) too but have phones and most of them have something expensive.

    It gets worse, every time there is even the tiniest altercation or anything at all the phones come out and there are 800 videos, some of them make the news making schools look more dangerous than they actually are. I could write a novel about this after the years I've spent posting A/C no one will read this anyway.

    captcha: anarchic

  55. Stopped doing this in Los Angeles by drkim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They used to arrest people in the Los Angeles subways for the same thing - but the Mayor finally stopped the ridiculous practice:

    "This is simply common sense. I want our law enforcement resources directed toward serious crime, not cell phone charging."

    http://www.scpr.org/news/2014/...

  56. Re:He stole, he got arrested by fgouget · · Score: 2

    From the linked article:

    "Electricity sockets on Overground trains are clearly marked with the words: “cleaners use only and not for public use”

    The sign sounds more like "we cannot be held responsible if this destroys your device" than a hard interdiction. Besides it's a really stupid way of doing things: they should just have a switch to turn off electricity to all these switches in the driver's compartment. The drivers would just have to turn the switch on/off when taking/parking the train (they already have a checklist to go through). Then the public can safely plug in all they want, without risk of 'abstracting' electricity or damaging their equipment.

  57. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It causes problems because the voltage spikes and can cause surges as the train is travelling. They are intended to be used inside stations by cleaning staff, which is why they're out of the way and marked with big signs saying "NOT FOR PUBLIC USE". Instead of a civil fine, or a criminal charges, he was later de-arrested, which is legally equivalent to having never been arrested in the first place.

    For someone refusing to follow the rules and becoming aggressive to a police officer telling him to, this seems a proportionate response.

  58. 400V and different plug by scsirob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is the easy fix. If they stick power outlets on trains that are not meant for the public, then they should ensure it doesn't work for the public. For example by using a non-standard power outlet that does not accept standard charger plugs, and perhaps by supplying some unusable power level through it. Like 400V or so. That will teach the public really quick.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:400V and different plug by squizzar · · Score: 1

      Behind this will be that the cleaning is outsourced to some contractor or similar, and they're avoiding the cost of having to change the plugs on all their appliances to some non-standard version just to use them on the trains. Same reason they're probably not locked etc. - too much organisation. Although I would have thought it would be quite easy to isolate them all from one point that's not accessible to the public.

    2. Re:400V and different plug by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Or how about putting a switch on those outlets somewhere that the general public can't get to it, or is at least unlikely to?

    3. Re:400V and different plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that the entire UK already followed that switch to a non-standard plug...

    4. Re:400V and different plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why adapters exist. Heaven forbid they have to use adapters.

    5. Re:400V and different plug by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      That would cost a lot of money over time. Imagine having to procure equipment that works with nonstandard voltage and has nonstandard plugs.

      The smart thing would be to cover the socket with a metal cover that has "not for public use" etched into it and add that as a rule to your list of rules that passengers implicitly agree to by entering your premises. If someone uses that socket to charge their phone, your security guards can fine them the standard fee for breaking the rules. Then there is no need to involve the police or the justice system, unless the passenger accuses you of lying.

      It may also help to have a designated power socket with controlled phase and voltage at each seat that the passengers can use.

    6. Re:400V and different plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put a small plastic locking cover over the outlet. give the cleaning crews keys done.

  59. Re: He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? You say:

    To plug your phone into the wall should not be to get arrested, unless there is a gigantic sign saying "PLUGGING INTO THIS IS PROHIBITED."

    There is a giant sign saying that, and explaining that the reason for it is safety, and he didn't unplug it when asked, and got aggressive towards a group of police officers, and ultimately had neither criminal charges, civil fines nor even the arrest itself on his record.

    Am a Londonner, wouldn't want people like this dealt with any other way.

  60. Private property by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    If I see a sign that says "not for public use" then I, as a member of the public, wouldn't even consider using it.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Private property by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So remove the "King" from the equation. Are you okay with a person stealing from the people to charge his phone? Suppose Mr. A is starving, is it okay for him go hunting on land reserved for the enjoyment of everyone else?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    2. Re:Private property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried eating my iphone once. not very sustaining. even with a full charge

  61. FTA: did anyone else read the law cited? by satch89450 · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I clicked on the link to see the definition of "abstracting electricity", in the section on case law the offense cited was meter tampering. As in substantionally "more than a few electrons." The cost of prosecution would far exceed the cost of the electricity used. (I would also see where this particular law would apply to unauthorized taps or splices, where the power draw would be signifiant.)

    One issue the article did bring up: the power at that train-car outlet isn't at all clean. If it uses external power pickup (third rail or overhead catenary) I could see where the surges, sags and dropouts would be severe enough to damage a phone or laptop, especially as the drive motors of the train, a highly inductive load, would cause very large spikes as the power pickup loses and re-makes contact. Contrast that with a long-haul train which supplies power from a locomotive generator, which shouldn't flicker at all.

    So it could well be that there is a cause for action of a different sort: "We are not liable for any damage caused by plugging anything into the outlets on this train."

  62. Re:abstracting electricity? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    Never mind about the de-arrest. For that he can now legitimately claim he was never arrested in the first place.

    However, it is of academic interest only because he is now under proper arrest for his behaviour towards the PCSO.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  63. FTFA by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Funny

    "a 45-year-old artist based in Islington"

    Get a proper job, you stupid fucking hipster.

  64. Re:He stole, he got arrested by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Informative

    most of the airports and stations I use have free charging points.

    The story here is someone was stupid enough to go to London then act surprised when it turned out to be a shit hole.

    A lot of trains in the UK have charging points for public use. They even have wi-fi on parts of the Underground now. However, the socket in question was apparently clearly marked "not for public use". The man knew he could get into trouble, he was just a bit surprised at how much.

    I mean, we're talking about the country that wants to make secure online shopping and banking illegal.

    Nope. The country does not want to do that. The Prime Minister of the country wants to introduce certain measures that, as a side effect, would make secure online shopping and banking illegal, but there's no evidence that the country as a whole would like that idea if they knew what the consequences were.

    The place is an international joke.

    You can find crazy things about any country that makes it an international joke in the eyes of everybody else. If you are an American you should understand that everybody else thinks of US gun laws as a dangerous joke and the fact that it seems their police officers would shoot a man for stealing electricity as arrest him (if he is black) would be viewed as a joke if it were not so tragic.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  65. Re:He stole, he got arrested by NoKaOi · · Score: 1

    Don't you think a reprimand - "you can't do that here sir" - would have been more appropriate?

    It sounds like that's exactly what the PCSO did. The problem is that rather than stopping, or even stopping while protesting it, instead he was a total asshole about it and continued to do it even though he was informed it was illegal. For any value of "it," the guy was a dumbass. If you're informed something is against the law and you refuse to stop doing it right in front of an officer, what do you expect to happen?

  66. Well done, cops. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    In France, on their TGVs (High speed trains) there are outlets for every seats.
    ditto in Germany, Luxembourg, Belgium ....

    The London Tourist office is surely not amused.

    1. Re:Well done, cops. by amalcolm · · Score: 2

      So are there on most inter-city trains in the UK. The difference is this one was at floor level, not close to a seat, and clearly labelled 'not for public use' I can image a scenario where a charger was damaged at hat level, exposing live terminals.

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
  67. Re:He stole, he got arrested by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    Funny or not there wasn't anything untrue in his post. Cameron has stated on multiple occasions that strong encryption is aiding the enemy and that he wants government backdoors inside all encryption. The problem with that is there is an entire black-market of dedicated, intelligent people who are working to find these backdoors and sell access to them to other criminals. To think that the government could keep those backdoors a secret is naive and by weakening our encryption to ostensibly "detect terrorists" he is opening up everyone else using those weakened encryption schemes to attack by criminals.

    Cameron is not "the country". More than 60% of the people here didn't want him as prime minister. I guess that means you can claim our voting system is a joke...

    If they didn't want people using them they shouldn't have put them there in the first place.

    The socket had a sign on it saying "not for public use". That should have been enough to stop him using it.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  68. Re:Totalitarian State by squizzar · · Score: 1

    So if I poke round your garden and find an external socket you won't mind me using it?

  69. what if it was... by NottaMehere · · Score: 1

    an android or windows phone? would he have been so 'abused'? ok, maybe the three people who own win phones might not live in london, and anyway, why was he on the train mixing with the hoi-poli, why didn't he use uber?

  70. Predictable (and right) outcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charging his phone up from a socket not intended for the purpose? Trivial. It's antisocial behaviour, but I seriously doubt he needed to do anything more than stop, apologise and plead stupidty.

    Getting aggressive with a PCSO when asked to stop? The man's clearly an idiot. No need to pretend.

  71. Charging by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

    I was born and lived in Yorkshire, England for 20 years, a place that has a light-hearted reputation for being tight with money. A couple of years ago my girlfriend and I went on a road trip and visited Yorkshire. We had breakfast in a cafe where I plugged in my phone. The owner came over and started talking about how we were putting him out of business and electricity isn't cheap etc. We thought he was joking at first. But then he asked us for 50p to cover the cost of the electric. He was serious.

    1. Re:Charging by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      That was your chance to teach him some basics of economics and the term opportunity cost. You and all your friends will take your business elsewhere vs. the extremely small cost of letting you charge your phones.

    2. Re:Charging by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      40p? What do you want 30p for?? Here this one, Gladys? He wants 20p for 'lectric! Here, yer tight git, here's ten. Keep the change. Happy fuckin' birthday.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  72. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Don't you think a reprimand - "you can't do that here sir" - would have been more appropriate?"

    What makes you think he didn't get that? The problem was that he got aggressive and anti-social in response.

  73. Re:abstracting electricity? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    Bah, they are just abstracting the language. Perfectly good.

  74. Always Kiss Arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The kids from school that became coppers were the snide ones. The others may not start out like that; but they deal with horrible people everyday. They become insane. I worked with a plastic copper for 4 years. The Us Vs Them mentality he had was horrible.
    Don't talk or deal with them. Always be ultra polite to the police. Yes Officer, No Officer, 3 bags full Officer. Get away from them.
    She may have been horrible when dealing with him, he was horrible back. They real police where not going to take his side.
    The 0.0001p of electric used was never the issue.

    COMPLY

  75. Re:abstracting electricity? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately for the artist, even through he has been de-arrested, he now probably no longer qualifies for the visa waiver programme for entry to the USA

    So a win-win situation then? He can no longer be forced by his kids to go to Disneyland.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  76. This looks like a job for Monty Python's by aurizon · · Score: 1

    Bureau of silly cops.
    I expect this outlet had no signage interdicting use, no trained spider chained there with a floss leash to bite charge thieves?
    I ask, why not....?

    1. Re:This looks like a job for Monty Python's by Grench · · Score: 2

      Sorry sir, we're right out of spiders.

      ... I've got a slug?

      --
      He's Jesus, for Christ's sake.
  77. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly so we can move there and maybe have a sane government once in a while.

  78. Abstracting air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are they going to start charging for air? Or maybe give us all pills so we stop abstracting electricity like in the movie EQUILIBRIUM

  79. Re:He stole, he got arrested by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Your link seems to be broken.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  80. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly why they are for staff use only - they're only supposed to be used when the train is in the depot, not while it is in motion.
    Newer trains have sockets fed from an inverter that don't have this problem - but they're limited in power output, which is why they're labelled as for mobile phones and laptops only.

  81. Re:He stole, he got arrested by daedalus2097 · · Score: 1

    Totally different from my interpretation of that notice. I see that as meaning they're not for public use, so the public shouldn't use them. I don't see how there's room for interpretation there...

  82. Re:He stole, he got arrested by amalcolm · · Score: 1
    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
  83. Re:abstracting electricity? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    It's because of the police and the retarded law makers.

    If you were drunken disorderly, walking the street drunk off your ass, the cops used to grab you and make you sleep it off in the drunk tank.

    Today, they ruin your life for ever.

    No wonder cops are universally hated. Police today are chosen to be drones that do as they are told, not high IQ types that can think for themselves. The laws are designed to punish everyone severely that even brush up against the law.

    It will come to a head, and it is going to get very ugly.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  84. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Excessive Loo paper use is a capitol offense that will get you 20 years of hard labor.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  85. Re:abstracting electricity? by mrbester · · Score: 1

    SCs have power of arrest (as a police officer, because they are police officers) unlike PCSOs who only have citizen levels. There's a whole bunch of "school prefect" style additions in order to keep someone around until an officer can arrest them if that officer deems it valid, but apart from that they are little more than a member of the public in a hi-viz jacket.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  86. London commuters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy was lucky there was a PCSO on the train. If his Apple charger decided to object to the out-of-spec supply by blowing up and happened to trip the train breakers, that PCSO might have been the only thing between the iphone idiot and a whole lot of London commuters about to deliver a well deserved kicking - one boot each, Murder on the Camden Express.

  87. Re:He stole, he got arrested by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Best thing to do if they confront you is simply refuse to talk to them, and if possible walk away. They can't detain you. If they touch you it's assault and you can have them arrested

    Yeah, right. The cops you call to "arrest" the PCSO are somewhat unlikely to take your side against theirs, it's tantamount to calling the cops to arrest another cop. Unless there is a massive indication in your favour (e.g. the PCSO has tied you to a lamppost and whipped you with barbed wire) , you're not going to be believed.

    Anyway, in reality the PCSO would call the real cops to arrest you first, and the story would be that you were asked to do something and reacted violently/abusively.

    As with the iphone bloke in this case, is it really worth losing your temper and spending several hours in a police cell over? If a PCSO asks you to do something reasonable, just do it, rather than turning into Captain Civil Rights.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  88. Re:He stole, he got arrested by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

    Two sheet limit. Use both sides. Twice if you have to.

    --
    Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
  89. Re:abstracting electricity? by advocate_one · · Score: 2

    the problem here is that you HAVE to do a spell as a PCSO before you can apply to become a real Policeman... this one was especially jumped up and keen and had probably read the charge book and remembered the abstraction of electricity charge and decided to try and get a 'gold star'...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  90. Re:He stole, he got arrested by tehcyder · · Score: 2
    If he'd just unplugged his iPhone nothing would have happened and he wouldn't even have been fined.

    Instead, he acted like a knob towards the PCSO who pointed out that there was in effect a gigantic sign saying "PLUGGING INTO THIS IS PROHIBITED" and subsequently to the actual police officers who turned up, so they arrested him for "being a total arse bucket in public" (or whatever the technical term is).

    Obviously no one was ever going to be prosecuted for stealing GBP 0.02 of electricity.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  91. Re: He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, I didn't realize England was full of sheep.

  92. Re: Power on train port of the service in Switzerl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. And you can own guns in Switzerland as well. And use encryption. And when you meet some member of the parliament or even the federal council on the tram (because they use public transportation) you can wave them hello and they will wave back.

  93. Re:He stole, he got arrested by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    The City, for historic reasons, is semi-independent. It's one of those vestigial structures where they have a lot of power on paper, but a general agreement never to actually use it. They do have their own police force and a 'shadow government' headed by the Lord Mayor.

    We do like our traditions. Plus it can be used for tax avoidance.

    *City of London Police, considered a world-class force in prosecuting fraud, but most widely despised as the source of PIPCU and their loose concept of jurisdiction.

  94. Meanwhile, back at the point by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why does the train have operational, accessible sockets if they are not to be used by the PAYING passengers??

    1. Re:Meanwhile, back at the point by defnoz · · Score: 1

      So the cleaners can plug in their equipment. When the train is stationary, and doesn't have wild voltage fluctuations due to the circuitry not having regulators designed to cope with the variation in line voltage between when the train's accelerating and decelerating (i.e. pumping power back into the line).

  95. This is ridiculous by vinaygurjar · · Score: 1

    Haha You arrest a man just for charging phone how dumb!

  96. Nude descending a staircase by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    In other news, Marcel Duchamp has been arrested for abstracting art.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Nude descending a staircase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he should have known better, after what happened to Picasso.

    2. Re:Nude descending a staircase by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      after what happened to Picasso.

      But unlike Duchamp, he was never called an "asshole".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  97. A little different from Stockholm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, here in Stockholm the use of the cleaners wall sockets in the newest commutertrains for gadget charging has been common practice for many years. There's now even official stickers showing where they are. Even better, the new bus model that's just being rolled out this summer have two USB charging sockets per double seat (newspaper article in swedish) and one socket at the weelchair spot (shared with any strollers).

  98. Re:He stole, he got arrested by tomhath · · Score: 1

    20 years of hard labor

    First, that should be "labour". Second, you will be put on a low fiber diet for those twenty years, so the labour isn't all that will be hard hard.

  99. It isn't getting any better by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    You know, this world isn't getting any better, it's just getting worse and worse.

  100. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many people are using the electrical outlets meant only for the cleaning crew. Authorities chose one to be made an example to the others. He's bitching about it.

  101. PCSO not Police by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2

    PCSO is a Police Community Support Officer, these are not Police Officers, they have very limited powers (they cannot Arrest somebody) and are typically wannabe that cannot cut the grade and have very limited knowledge of the law and in this case even the English language given their confusion of the semantics difference between Abstration and Extraction.

    UK Trains provide charging points for laptops and mobile phones and have signs announcing this, and this is also on the national rail website . These are low power and not suitable for a heavy load like a vacum cleaner.

    "WiFi and power points for laptops and mobile phone chargers are available on some trains"
    http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/...

    The guy was immediately 'de-arrested' and released by the custody Sergeant and why he will get compensation is due course for false arrest.

    1. Re:PCSO not Police by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      UK Trains provide charging points for laptops and mobile phones and have signs announcing this, and this is also on the national rail website .

      Fast long distance trains on major routes in the UK usually have sockets near some or all of the seats labeled "laptops and mobile phones only" or similar intended for passenger use. Local trains and slow trains generally do not have them. These are a relatively recent thing, first appearing on new trains in the early 2000s.

      Many UK trains have sockets located at the back of the luggage racks or similar labeled with "not for public use" signs and sometimes other warnings . My understanding is that these sockets are intended for use by the cleaners, may not nessacerally meet the voltage/frequency norms for domestic power and even if they did I doubt train operators would want to encourage people to charge phones and laptops there. These have been arround a LOT longer than the sockets intended for passenger use.

      Still an arrest seems OTT unless there were aggravating factors.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  102. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stealing shouldn't be prohibited? What a brilliant concept.

  103. Re:abstracting electricity? by zennyboy · · Score: 1

    If you were drunken disorderly

    *Drunk and disorderly

  104. Re:He stole, he got arrested by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    That's why you film everything. Either they will behave because of the camera, or they will screw up and face the consequences. Make sure you have auto-upload turned on and a strong password set.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  105. Florida Led The Way by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Florida has a grocery store that had a homeless man arrested for charging his phone with an outlet outside the store. He took perhaps 15 cents in electricity and was sentenced to seven months in jail. You see Florida really loves and cares for the homeless. It sort of gives a whole new meaning to Christian charity doesn't it?

    1. Re:Florida Led The Way by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      Citation? I see where a homeless man spent one night in jail and it was thrown out. That was one individual cop, not Florida.

  106. Don't program on the Tube by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Who knows what OTHER kinds of abstractions could get you nicked!

    Abstracting the server layer - that's a week in the pound!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  107. You're all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not theft.

    It's arson.

  108. abstracting-object-oriented electricity use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw that the was "abstracting", I immediately thought that he was using some type of object oriented electricity encapsulating or inheritance process. It turns out he was just stealing electricity. Perhaps there needs to be a little old man or woman standing by each outlet and charging people to plug in, similar to the use of toilets / WCs. I the US, there would be much outrage.

  109. Re:abstracting electricity? by sosume · · Score: 1

    Which is totally opposite as it was half a century ago. At least, where I live. If you were too drunk to come home, you'd be taken by the cops to sleep it off and then you'd be able to go home without further consequences. Nowadays, if you drink too much you get arrested, it's added to your permanent record, a digital trail is created and you are labelled for life as an alcoholic.
    On the other hand, real crime like robbery or burglary was a grave offence, meaning you'd be punished harshly and excommunicated from your family. These days they are handled as if they are victims of society, getting light sentences if caught at all (first offence a slap on the wrist, second offence some community service, and so on) and are usually out after a few hours. It will get ugly indeed.

  110. Power Surges by suss · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    On a forum dedicated to the London Underground, members have pointed out that plug sockets on the trains are for cleaning equipment deployed when trains are in depots. They recommend not charging electronic equipment as there is a risk of power surge: âoeIf something was directly plugged into it (for example a standard computer, or a laptop without a battery in) the equipment would probably be damaged at any section gaps where the power supply changes from one substation to another!â

    It's basically to avoid getting sued if a power surge breaks your device.

  111. Not quite right calculation, but still small. by tomxor · · Score: 1

    So assuming he fully-charged his iPhone 6 Plus, 11.1WH * 0.61 * 0.15/1000 = 0.00101565, he would have used 0.1 UK cents worth of electricity

    11.1Wh * 0.61 ? i'm pretty sure if the efficiency is anything less than 100% it will take more energy to charge the battery and definitely not less... so shouldn't this be 11.1Wh * (1 / 0.61)?

    Also i don't know what kind of crazy tiny cents you are using but there are only 100 penies in a GBP so it would be about 0.27p

  112. Abstracting time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the train companies can get support from PCSOs to enforce Electricity Abstraction laws then I want to charge my train company for the daily abstraction of my time due to track/train related delays.

    This accounts for a shed load more money wasted - my time plus thousands of other people's time - than a 10 minute charge of a bloody phone!

  113. Sounds like the British female equivalent to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paul Blart the mallcop....

  114. Meanwhile in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, in Canada, man rides across country and charges e-bike along the way entirely for free. Calculates the cost at about 10cents a day.

  115. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you'd be right, except that "destroying your device" may well lead to "starting a fire", which is a bit of a public safety issue on a moving train.

  116. Re:abstracting electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're correct. The US does not have a concept of "de-arrest".

    Arrest is a simple detention and does not imply guilt or even accusation. It's merely a formality that the police stopped you from going about your business while they conducted a preliminary investigation of a suspected offense.

    An arrest can even be made to protect someone from an external threat. Yeah, that means you can be completely innocent and known to the police as such, but still spend time in temporary lock-up while the police go track down an actual criminal that is threatening you.

    Arrest carries little if any social stigma in the US beyond the most basic "haha! he got in trouble!" sort. An "arrest record" in the US is actually a conviction record, and a simple "catch-and-release" arrest will not be noted on it. This is what "innocent until proven guilty" means. And while everyone panics about that basic tenet of our legal system going away or being eroded, the fact is that it isn't anywhere near gone.

    This guy won't be denied a visa by the US just because of this incident.

  117. Re:Totalitarian State by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    The "community police officer" is in the same business as the religious police in Saudi Arabia or Iran, or authorities in North Korea or Putin's Russia.

    Congrats on not actually using the word "Gestapo", although it could hardly have been more hyperbolic otherwise.

    Anyone who can equate asking someone not to use an outlet marked as not for public use and shipping people off to be flogged or interned in a labour camp is so far out of touch with reality it's not even amusing.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  118. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man was charging at high speed... that is definitely dangerous.

    OTOH, I thought people could only be arrested for factual crimes, not for abstracting ones.

    Let's also take a lesson from all this to protect us in the future: beware of practical people, because they hate abstracting. One of these might kill you -- if that's more practical.

    Finally, it's the UK: the arrested man could consider himself lucky that he wasn't shot right there in the train.

  119. The real cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Estimated cellphone charger power usage:
    (5 watts) * 30 minutes = 0.0025 kilowatt hours

    1 kwh costs on average 0.14 GBP

    So he stole 0.00035 GBP from the government, of course it's the government they'll spend tens of thousands trying to get it back.

    The more reasonable responses would be to allow people to charge phones (and damage their chargers as they claim), or to write citations and harass those people by mail like the rest of the civilized world.

  120. Edward Kirlian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  121. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  122. Re:abstracting electricity? by bledri · · Score: 1

    ... On the other hand, real crime like robbery or burglary was a grave offence, meaning you'd be punished harshly and excommunicated from your family. These days they are handled as if they are victims of society, getting light sentences if caught at all (first offence a slap on the wrist, second offence some community service, and so on) and are usually out after a few hours. It will get ugly indeed.

    1. Where in the world do you live?
    2. Citation please (for criminals being treated like victims, not for where you live).
    --
    Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  123. how about an airport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it legal to do the same (I mean charge phone) on the airport?
    I pay absurd airport fees so I take it for granted.
    Same with subway, I paid for ticket, they provided outlet (without a note "for staff only") - I paid for it.

  124. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe install a breaker then? Train moves, circuit opens.

    That was hard to fix.

  125. What is with people and phones? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of an article I read over the weekend where an audience member at a Broadway play jumped on stage to try and plug their phone into a prop socket. That's right, it wasn't even a socket on a wall, it was part of the stage scenery.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  126. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should not get you arrested, even if it is clearly marked. It should get you fined at most. The initial arrest seems absurd. Period.
    If he became a complete raving mad man after that, well then that might be a reasonable arrest. However I think many people would be freaked out about being arrested for something so trivial. Give him the ticket and move on. If he continues give him another ticket. He will stop once the bill is high enough.

    Seems like there are some thin-skinned police in the UK.

  127. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop squabbling, you're both right.

    The US is a joke because of its stupid, poorly educated, flag-waving, bible-thumping, over-patriotic population and its completely out of control, corrupted, racist, military wannabe police force.

    The UK is a joke because of its completely out of touch, totalitarian, CCTV-spamming, "let's-use-1984-as-a-manual", retarded politicians and their unfortunate policies. FFS, how can "unacceptable behaviour" be ground for an arrest? Like your citizens were unruly children.

  128. In mother Russia..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    outlet charges you....

  129. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you going to pay the engineer to add that in? Are you going to pay the additional cost of cleaning? Multiply by the parts and manpower needed by 1000 for every bus, train, subway. Add in the cumulative manpower over the course of the years. $15/hr cleaner * 0.002 hours (10 seconds to walk over and turn it on) * 365 days a year * 1,000 vehicles.

    Almost $110K /yr assuming the switches magically appeared overnight..

  130. Effect on a switched-mode power supply by tepples · · Score: 1

    How much would "abrupt phase changes" affect the switched-mode power supply in a typical USB charger?

    1. Re:Effect on a switched-mode power supply by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      How much would "abrupt phase changes" affect the switched-mode power supply in a typical USB charger?

      If the change resulted in a spike that doubled or tripled or more the voltage (keep in mind the inductive nature of electrical wiring and the motors attached to them) it could blow it out.

      Even the transients caused by switching the motors (how the speed is controlled) can be huge.

      If you can buy a USB charger for $2, you have to realize how cheaply made they are. Cheaply made means all those bits that would make them survive abnormal use and protect the device being charged are left out.

  131. Double insulation by tepples · · Score: 1

    FWIW most consumer devices are a considerable hazard as they have no 3rd prong "earth ground".

    I thought the double insulation between housing and any line-level power supply was supposed to eliminate the need for case ground.

  132. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I know on the Amtrak Acela express trains there are outlets at every seat for the convenience of charging your stuff.

  133. Classic /.inflammatory summary by paul_metcalfe · · Score: 1

    Just like the good old times. Post angers people. Read TFA and all those new details put it in a different light (he also later got 'unarrested'). And you get an even greater sense that you're still not getting the full story.

    Many complain /. ain't what it used to be. But this is the classic /. type of content we're used to.

    There's a reason why posts like these get the most replies.

    Bonus points for misspelling 'extracting' as 'abstracting'. English ain't even my first language, but these words aren't even pronounced the same way.

    --
    Always read at -1, don't let others decide what you should and should not read.
    1. Re:Classic /.inflammatory summary by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for misspelling 'extracting' as 'abstracting'. English ain't even my first language, but these words aren't even pronounced the same way.

      So try looking in a dictionary before spouting off. Abstracting_electricity It rather undermines your point about taking time to RTFA before posting.

    2. Re:Classic /.inflammatory summary by paul_metcalfe · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, relax. Like I said, English ain't my first language. I've been practising for 20 years. Looks like I'm still not there yet.

      --
      Always read at -1, don't let others decide what you should and should not read.
  134. PCSO's are mini-Nazis by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Police Community Support Officers are nothing more than mini-Nazis. They're a bunch of nosy busybodies who love to strut their bullshit authority and poke their noses into EVERYTHING whether it concerns them or not. They're not that different than the Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  135. Re:Totalitarian State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've paid for a ticket to enter my garden just as this rider paid to board the train? Absolutely I wouldn't mind if you wanted to charge your phone.

  136. holy crap by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    Better know your law, people: abstracting electricity is a Statutory offence under the Theft Act 1968 and carries a sentence of FIVE YEARS.

    You get less for fucking babies.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  137. Soviet UK? by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

    In Soviet UK, phone charges you?

  138. Re:abstracting electricity? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    this is England, where convicted criminals in jail get to drag the UK through the European Court of Human Rights because they're not being provided with free Sky Sports, while entire families are being destroyed by the State on a daily basis while being denied proper representation, witnesses, or even a proper court of Law.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  139. Re:He stole, he got arrested by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    you don't need a cop to arrest a PCSO who has assaulted you.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  140. Re:Totalitarian State by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    if I find you poking around in my garden I will arrest you for trespass.

    My bounded property is not a public right of way.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  141. Re:Tax dollars at work. - their v. there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. why are their outlets on the train if they are not to be used?

    why are there outlets on the train

  142. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha...Ken Livingston...Hahahaha...Boris Johnson...Hahahaha...Diane Abbott...Hahahaha...George Galloway(2005-10)

    But seriously, no, wrong.

  143. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having lived in both places I can confirm the truth of the above completely. Now cue the replies from both sides (though mainly Brits, for the record I was born/raised there, left in my late 20's) claiming inaccuracy.

  144. Why did they bother? by dhaen · · Score: 1

    Was he doing any harm, apart from the absolutely tiny amount of power consumed? I seems a waste of police time. If he hadn't been challenged, he wouldn't have reacted and therefore no further offence committed.

  145. Man charged with electricity theft ! by SlashDotterOne · · Score: 1

    Man charged with electricity theft !

    1. Re:Man charged with electricity theft ! by SlashDotterOne · · Score: 1

      Or rather, Charged with charging his battery ?

  146. For a crime that was originally an abstraction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that shit suddenly got real.

  147. Re: He stole, he got arrested by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

    I waited till early thirties. long after most of my peer group. no hope for that place. it's a sunken ship.

  148. Re: He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not really.

    from what I've seen most of the us is pretty cool. just a few loud mouths that give it a bad name.

    the loud mouths in the UK on the other hand actually give it a good name. place is run and owned by a tiny occult family who think they've got blue blood. and the rest of the country is best parodied by little Britain.

    funny cos it's true.

    nuff said.

  149. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bingo, at best it is a bylaw offense.

    Indeed, I can imagine the following being a rather effective approach by police/security. "Sir, you are aware that plugging in here isn't technically allowed, right?"

    Just that. No follow-up action, no aggression, no consequences. Just let the individual know that you are paying attention. Odds are good that the person will apologize or explain. You are engaging them as a human being over a minor matter. Everyone knows what is going on and there's no escalation of the situation. The police might even find out that some people are illiterate, or not paying attention to signage, or are in a desperate situation with a need to use a discharged phone.

    If the citizen chooses to escalate after that, well then maybe an arrest is called for.

  150. Re:He stole, he got arrested by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

    Ah ok, I guess I should have RTFA.

    --
    A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
  151. BAN METAPOWER NOW! by sabbede · · Score: 1

    No more abstract electricity!

  152. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what I just spent an hour reading is maybe the silliest thread I've read in some time.
    Not only is the topic matter is about 10p in electricity! Really! It's about a petty private renta cop abusing power. It's about a perp simply saying sorry and defusing the encounter. It's about a Brit objecting to the American use of our system of currency and it's related postings......
    Really guys? Really?

  153. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you Brits criticize us Americans? The electricity used is minuscule. I'm floored this is a real issue.

  154. PROBLEM SOLVED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put cell chargers on the train. Any combustion engine produces more electric than it uses. Put outlets on the train where you swipe a credit card and you plug in for 1 hour to charge the phone. Make money stop being Nazis'

  155. iPhone charging on trains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen many a s.o on trains,always thought it was generous provision like WiFi;there no notices of indication they were not to used

  156. Unarrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A waste of olive resources id say especially after the man was later âoeun-arrestedâ for the offence.

  157. Saddening, outlets are MODERNITY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same in NYC, there were arrests that I know, then outlets started popping out here and there unreliably as any **offended one** would turn them off as soon as possible. DD offers plugs, very popular way to attract clients; DD workers shut them down and never fix them after broken, and the same happens in other chains. In the end free power for electronics is a technical problem but underlying it is the deep misery of individuals who cannot understand this is the modern world and using electricity is a MUST, portable electricity is a basic need, electricity becomes cheaper the more we use it, electronics are inexpensive in terms of electrical power, etc. This news comes out a few days after I see for the first time an individual, Indian, charging from an open outlet from the CEILING LIGHTS in a subway station, along with a power extension and ostensibly blocking one third of the corridor with his cable. I thought it was too much and risky! Particularly being one block away from an outlet bearing DD. No action was taken, but even I than am loaded with extra extra-charge batteries and solar chargers considered that discovery as a very last resort in case of a very real, personal, charging emergency... A serious study should be performed in both countries and the rest of the modern world to ENSURE (free and) sufficient and reliable outlets be widely available for electronics in the age of portable electronics! As a matter of Principle.

  158. Rightfully by terrywirth5 · · Score: 1

    should be arrested for violation of Article 101: willful ignorance. Why? Overspending for an overrated phone that everybody knows has pitiful battery life but has spawned an entire industry of remoras of which said phone maker takes a cut of the spoils.

  159. Re:abstracting electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The blacks hold jail time and robbery as badges of honor.

    This is another thing wrong with their culture in the United states. Outside of the USA, they are sane and normal people. and yes I do know there are sane and normal blacks here in the USA as well.

    But even they hate the fact that the majority believe crime is good.

  160. Let's run through this again. by megaronic · · Score: 1

    The outlets are marked for cleaners. They are only allowed to use them when the train is stopped.

    If anyone uses them when the train was running it would have diverted the power available and slowed the train down.

    The train may have been late and the rail company could be fined.

    Hence the use of the word "abstracted".