Re:Wonder if they know what they're in for...
on
Get Paid To Crack?
·
· Score: 1
And i have a real hard time with parent companies (vicominc.com) who have a long domain name history dating back to.... january 2003
Domain Name: VICOMINC.COM
Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
Name Server: PARK3.SECURESERVER.NET
Name Server: PARK4.SECURESERVER.NET
Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
Updated Date: 12-jan-2003
Creation Date: 02-jan-2003
Expiration Date: 02-jan-2004
Also, check out Whois for corptech.net and ctusa.net......weird...call me paranoid.
The real problem I have with this whole issue is that he did not imply or state in his report that @stake was sanctioning it in any way. The only @stake mention is in his title and his biography. If that can be construed in any way shape or form that @stake somehow approved of the report then someone has to go somewhere in a hand basket.
Slashdot Mirror
And i have a real hard time with parent companies (vicominc.com) who have a long domain name history dating back to.... january 2003 Domain Name: VICOMINC.COM Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC. Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com Name Server: PARK3.SECURESERVER.NET Name Server: PARK4.SECURESERVER.NET Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK Updated Date: 12-jan-2003 Creation Date: 02-jan-2003 Expiration Date: 02-jan-2004 Also, check out Whois for corptech.net and ctusa.net......weird...call me paranoid.
The real problem I have with this whole issue is that he did not imply or state in his report that @stake was sanctioning it in any way. The only @stake mention is in his title and his biography. If that can be construed in any way shape or form that @stake somehow approved of the report then someone has to go somewhere in a hand basket.