Look at more modern events. A harsh regime in Egypt that banned political activity but allowed people to meet in mosques meant that when the regime changed the parties built around religion were the ones who had been meeting for years and were the only ones that had their shit together. That part is almost an exact replay of Iran when the Shah was kicked out.
The first Russian conquests of Central Asia began as a result of
A well written history of the Romanov's came out recently. That and what seems like everything else indicates that Tsars had their eye on the area for generations but were too busy with other things.
Then there's the 35% or so who believe that terrorism against the west is okay.
Roll things back a few years and there were plenty of Americans that thought terrorism against the UK was okay. Senator Peter King is to this day proud of his funding of Irish Republican Army bombs.
It's their Peter Kings we have to watch out for and make things difficult for them to get their money to Daash and so on, but the rest who just grumble are as ignorable as all those people drinking beer and mentioning "the struggle" were.
The some states are pushing Sharia law against homosexuals and women under the name of evangelical Christianity (the kind where Jesus is optional but money is everything). Most Muslims are not.
You can not be any other religion other than the one you were born into by your parents
That's the way it is being used, as a proxy for race. The flaw you have pointed out just doesn't matter in this situation. The important thing is apparently to have someone to attack who doesn't have the political power to stand up for themselves. It's the age old play of kicking a cripple in order to look "strong".
With Hitler he wrote what he was going to do in a tedious book. With Trump we have no fucking idea what he is going to do and I'm not sure he knows either. Expect a weak Presidency with a lot of people pushing their own agendas.
That's the convenient fiction fed to us by utter amoral weasels but when the shit gets real folk such as Bernie Madoff who depend on that fiction still sometimes get held to account and jailed.
Like a camera - the best is the one you have when you want to use it. Just go for something with the specs you want at the price you want, then do a quick google search to see if it's one of the rare things where the manufacturer has not supplied linux drivers or given the community enough info to write them. The best choice IMHO for anything that doesn't have to do workstation computing is something that's now too slow to run Win8/10, shove a cheap SSD in it and it will just fly with 99% of linux applications. Remember that even Libreoffice runs fairly well on a Raspberry Pi and there is no recent laptop with specs that low.
If it's to run workstation software check with the software vendor about what OS they need - some laptops have problems with CentOS5 (2007) if the vendor doesn't like 6 (2010) or 7 (current).
It's the "religious" nutters who need to grow up while those you are calling "SJW's" probably go to burlesque shows. I put "religious" in quotes since there are a lot of people who go around telling everyone how holy they are but if Jesus turned up they would call him a Commie and bang in the nails. The actual religious people who actually go around helping people probably couldn't care one way or another about issues of Playboy.
Obama "approved" these nuclear reactors by speaking in front of them
Yes. That open hostility you imagine was not there that day was it?
We should be building a new nuclear power plant every month in the USA
Economy of scale you goose - the "blind" bit seems spot on but the "seer" no so much. Learn about the topic before attempting to lecture the reader - if you want nukes you want them BIG so that you have shitloads of steam in one location and can get every lats little bit of energy out. The reactors themselves don't need to be big (eg. pebble bed) so long as you have a few of them within reach of your turbines.
but made no such other approvals since
And none denied either. The energy environment since 2010 has meant nobody has tried to put anything up for approval.
In 2005, there was a prediction that 50 million people would be displaced by global warming by 2010. Didn't even come close to coming true.
For some reason this is the first I've ever heard of it. What is the point of debunking some obscure lie somewhere and pretending that the lie is mainstream? It just seems like a mindless way to try to start a fight to me.
Trump himself and the GOP have stated that nuclear power should be developed. The Obama administration and the Democrats are openly hostile to nuclear power.
WTF? Obama approved construction of some reactors a few years ago.
What large corporate IT department has their executives running any version of Windows Pro on their laptops, rather than Enterprise connected to their centralised update servers etc?
Any of them that allow their execs to buy their own stuff, which is probably most of them.
For the second there are a lot of MS Windows shops out there that trust Microsoft without question. Sometimes I argue with those sort of people but it is really pointless - the only solution is to firewall them off as much as possible to stop them from getting burnt a lot by the outside world.
Yes. IMHO you should be able to buy stuff if you belong to a race the baker doesn't like, a sexuality the baker doesn't like or belong to a club the baker doesn't like. The vendor has the same reason in all cases and can call on the name of a personal bigoted God to back them up but it looks like the Supreme Court isn't impressed with that sort of shit.
From your above post it's been starting to look like you've been building a strawman in my name to attack with views different to what I have written. Have the words in this post stated clearly enough where I'm coming from and why I said I've seen all this stuff before?
Why are you still posting shit about a topic you know nothing about? Of course I understand. The only thing not understood here is in your own head. Now you are doing all out fucking numerology with patch numbers without having a fucking clue about what is an X extension, what is part of the core of X and what is a removal of code (Daniel Stone removing xprint was a very large patch by these numbers despite it actually meaning a lot less code in X). I suggest learning what a number actually represents before throwing it around.
The way he has been whipping up crowd hatred against media members at his rallies for months is what has been referred to as well as his comments. Now we are seeing the sort of reaction that happens from media outlets when they have nothing to lose. Attempting to be nice to Trump and pretending that his deceptions are real is getting the media nothing but more hate, so why play nice?
At least that's the way a professor of Journalism was describing the situation - I can't find the quote on the net since it was a radio interview. If you don't want to take my word that some people have opinions like that then you wouldn't believe a citation anyway.
Hostage deal you goose. Massive payment. On of several later deals did have included a Bible signed by Reagan which is apparently on display in Tehran (how weird is that?) but despite that being an almost certain sign of Reagan being involved I was not referring to that deal.
Slashdot Mirror
We have a new Trump!
A harsh regime in Egypt that banned political activity but allowed people to meet in mosques meant that when the regime changed the parties built around religion were the ones who had been meeting for years and were the only ones that had their shit together.
That part is almost an exact replay of Iran when the Shah was kicked out.
A well written history of the Romanov's came out recently. That and what seems like everything else indicates that Tsars had their eye on the area for generations but were too busy with other things.
Roll things back a few years and there were plenty of Americans that thought terrorism against the UK was okay.
Senator Peter King is to this day proud of his funding of Irish Republican Army bombs.
It's their Peter Kings we have to watch out for and make things difficult for them to get their money to Daash and so on, but the rest who just grumble are as ignorable as all those people drinking beer and mentioning "the struggle" were.
The same one.
Jesus is in their book too.
The some states are pushing Sharia law against homosexuals and women under the name of evangelical Christianity (the kind where Jesus is optional but money is everything). Most Muslims are not.
That's the way it is being used, as a proxy for race. The flaw you have pointed out just doesn't matter in this situation. The important thing is apparently to have someone to attack who doesn't have the political power to stand up for themselves. It's the age old play of kicking a cripple in order to look "strong".
Why not? It's a lot better than a two party system.
With compulsory voting I doubt Trump or Hillary would have been considered fit to stand.
With Hitler he wrote what he was going to do in a tedious book. With Trump we have no fucking idea what he is going to do and I'm not sure he knows either. Expect a weak Presidency with a lot of people pushing their own agendas.
That's the convenient fiction fed to us by utter amoral weasels but when the shit gets real folk such as Bernie Madoff who depend on that fiction still sometimes get held to account and jailed.
Ignore ooloorie, he has a very long history of jumping onto issues he does not understand to troll.
Like a camera - the best is the one you have when you want to use it.
Just go for something with the specs you want at the price you want, then do a quick google search to see if it's one of the rare things where the manufacturer has not supplied linux drivers or given the community enough info to write them.
The best choice IMHO for anything that doesn't have to do workstation computing is something that's now too slow to run Win8/10, shove a cheap SSD in it and it will just fly with 99% of linux applications. Remember that even Libreoffice runs fairly well on a Raspberry Pi and there is no recent laptop with specs that low.
If it's to run workstation software check with the software vendor about what OS they need - some laptops have problems with CentOS5 (2007) if the vendor doesn't like 6 (2010) or 7 (current).
It's the "religious" nutters who need to grow up while those you are calling "SJW's" probably go to burlesque shows.
I put "religious" in quotes since there are a lot of people who go around telling everyone how holy they are but if Jesus turned up they would call him a Commie and bang in the nails. The actual religious people who actually go around helping people probably couldn't care one way or another about issues of Playboy.
Just wrong time and place - remember the ridiculous storm in a teacup over a bare nipple at the superbowl?
The same sort of fuss applies here.
Yes.
That open hostility you imagine was not there that day was it?
Economy of scale you goose - the "blind" bit seems spot on but the "seer" no so much. Learn about the topic before attempting to lecture the reader - if you want nukes you want them BIG so that you have shitloads of steam in one location and can get every lats little bit of energy out. The reactors themselves don't need to be big (eg. pebble bed) so long as you have a few of them within reach of your turbines.
And none denied either. The energy environment since 2010 has meant nobody has tried to put anything up for approval.
For some reason this is the first I've ever heard of it.
What is the point of debunking some obscure lie somewhere and pretending that the lie is mainstream? It just seems like a mindless way to try to start a fight to me.
Don't blame the scientists for some shit said by a pimply political intern somewhere that then ended up in a speech.
WTF? Obama approved construction of some reactors a few years ago.
Neal Stephenson imagined it and made it part of "Snow Crash".
Welcome to modern America where the Space Age is happening elsewhere.
Or in practice in electric locomotives for what must be more than three quarters of a century by now.
Any of them that allow their execs to buy their own stuff, which is probably most of them.
For the second there are a lot of MS Windows shops out there that trust Microsoft without question. Sometimes I argue with those sort of people but it is really pointless - the only solution is to firewall them off as much as possible to stop them from getting burnt a lot by the outside world.
Yes.
IMHO you should be able to buy stuff if you belong to a race the baker doesn't like, a sexuality the baker doesn't like or belong to a club the baker doesn't like.
The vendor has the same reason in all cases and can call on the name of a personal bigoted God to back them up but it looks like the Supreme Court isn't impressed with that sort of shit.
From your above post it's been starting to look like you've been building a strawman in my name to attack with views different to what I have written. Have the words in this post stated clearly enough where I'm coming from and why I said I've seen all this stuff before?
Why are you still posting shit about a topic you know nothing about? Of course I understand. The only thing not understood here is in your own head.
Now you are doing all out fucking numerology with patch numbers without having a fucking clue about what is an X extension, what is part of the core of X and what is a removal of code (Daniel Stone removing xprint was a very large patch by these numbers despite it actually meaning a lot less code in X).
I suggest learning what a number actually represents before throwing it around.
The way he has been whipping up crowd hatred against media members at his rallies for months is what has been referred to as well as his comments.
Now we are seeing the sort of reaction that happens from media outlets when they have nothing to lose.
Attempting to be nice to Trump and pretending that his deceptions are real is getting the media nothing but more hate, so why play nice?
At least that's the way a professor of Journalism was describing the situation - I can't find the quote on the net since it was a radio interview. If you don't want to take my word that some people have opinions like that then you wouldn't believe a citation anyway.
Hostage deal you goose. Massive payment.
On of several later deals did have included a Bible signed by Reagan which is apparently on display in Tehran (how weird is that?) but despite that being an almost certain sign of Reagan being involved I was not referring to that deal.