You may have read that, but reality is shit like systemd hanging indefinitely waiting to detect a wireless mouse dongle (noticed it was hung booting and rebooted after five hours, then pulled the dongle and rebooted again). The parallel idea didn't happen. The rage is due to it being perpetually a half finished sack of shit expanding into other areas before the existing ones are fixed. It's more rage at poor implementation than the idea itself.
Clonezilla does a bit of compression on every file system it understands so it's fairly quick in most situations as well as being easy to use in most situations. It even has "photorec" as part of the software in case you want to restore deleted files.
You are clearly just here for an argument and have now driven off into a contentless realm far from the actual topic, which was never important in the first place. Pathetic.
your facts
Now that is even more pathetic - it takes a special sort of "define your own reality" type to have "their own facts". It's not some shit I've made up or bent out of shape for some "mass debate" game but instead just a link to something I don't "own", a historical footnote that is nowhere near contraversial just to illustrate a point that could have been made other ways.
You've wasted so much time here jumping in to defend some revisionist loser who was willing to lie to argue about an analogy. Why? What is the rules of the game? How do you score? How utterly pathetic do have have to be to play it at other people's expense like you are and make this site far shittier in the process?
Instead of playing such a stupid fucking game why not amuse yourself reading this instead: http://www.amazon.com.au/Short-History-Stupid-decline-reason-ebook/dp/B00MWHQKFI
The challenge came nowhere close to refutation and was just a silly word game and straight out dishonesty. The only thing interesting at this point is why people stoop so low over something so trivial and why you jumped in to try to play some silly little troll argument game debating against reality.
Funny thing - Chinese Gooseberries are called "kiwifruit" and they are shipped in to Beijing from NZ for less than trucking them in from another part of china.
Then there's weird stuff like the energy costs to run a dairy in the north of the UK being high enough that in both economic and fuel consumption terms it's less to bring the milk in from New Zealand. That's a sign of how much the ships can move. There are plenty of other reasons to buy local but the pollution one doesn't fit anymore.
Atlas Shrugged is a more complex book than is generally understood
Pretending that a Hollywood studio is communist requires a great deal of complexity - but Rand had a grudge!
Most of the book can be reduced to a cry to bring back the Tsar and the Russian nobility to run wherever Rand is standing: notice how jailbait Dagny was special due to her family connections and that was enough? Don't get me started on Rear-Done metal and the pathetic bullying scene of putting a government representative in his place for not serving the true blue-bloods. I'm sure you understand the USA ten times better than Rand with her pathetic screed against capitalism and democratic republics.
Doing it properly was also a legacy of WW2. The medical examinations of British enlisting revealed a nation of many sick and unproductive people and that the economic benefit of well run health care would far exceed the cost.
You are learning Grasshopper. Doing it for everyone is not communism, just as vet hospitals are not communism. "Commercial realities", as in rent seekers not wanting to lose their cash flow, have put a lot of money into pockets to ensure that the sort of health care available to returned soldiers is not available to all with economies of scale that would reduce the profits of the rent seekers.
Personally, I don't think healthcare coverage should be related to employment at all. It really doesn't make sense for them to be tied together, and makes people afraid of quitting a lousy job that they hate.
It works both ways - Hollywood jobs bled to Canada, Australia etc because the taxation costs per position covering healthcare are much less than if they had to pay for healthcare coverage for each position. The US system is not to the benefit of either employees or employers.
And yet we hear every few days of other places where they're breaking the law - though not convicted yet
In Australia for instance they just refused a compromise deal where they have to pay the same tax everyone else does - so they are guilty of tax evasion. The article today is behind a paywall (australian.com.au) but google will probably turn up something that is not if anyone cares enough to go looking for that example instead of others.
Interesting. I did not realize that was the case, and that is a big problem. That leads me to ask....what about disability if you are a driver and hit by uninsured?
You beg on the streets, but that's "the American way" in the eyes of these folks.
Ridiculous - the filter is that you can call up and complain. You are digging beyond the bottom of the barrel here. With the vast number of posts you've spammed us with based on more and more flimsy bullshit it's looking like you are a "social media worker" paid by the post and pretty crap at content.
Why stop at that? Go to those disaster areas and loot - if the owners are dead you are not hurting anyone. Why travel when you can graverob at home instead? Your "it's OK to exploit people who can't find easy alternatives" may be what you see as "the American way" but only from the most amoral of the bunch in "Deadwood".
The flipside would be not being able to get a taxi at noon due to a lack of profit in it. Uber are pricks a dozen ways and demonstrate yet again that any *ism uninformed with morality sucks.
Regulation is good if it helps competition I've never understood the medallion system
That sort of idea of offering exclusive rights to offering a service dates back to King John is not earlier. Those governing make money out of it and those who buy the rights have a barrier to keep competitors out. I'm not defending it just framing the issue and pointing out why those that have paid to be inside the barrier are pissed off by others that do not have to wear the same costs.
Near where I am Uber has just refused a compromise deal where they have to pay tax - the same goods and services tax that every other company in the country has to pay on transactions. They seem determined to remain outside the law and just influence those in power to look the other way.
With you daily Uber stories/ads. You suck cock for money. Whores.
There's a class of people whose most profound fear is that, somehow, somewhere, somebody is making a profit.
Making a profit without paying tax on it. That class of people that are afraid of it are the class of people that are running governments, whether we like it or not. Uber is a "fuck you, we are taking over and taking all the money" sort of bunch, which should be kept in mind even if those that they are displacing are as bad or worse.
Read a book kid instead of making shit up. There are things called libraries that have those things called books, including some books called encyclopedias where you can look up historical figures and learn about them.
When someone questions your facts
When someone equates their gut feeling and a desire to run down the opposing team in a pissing contest to an actual fact there's no point pretending that such a lie is real - especially over something so incredibly trivial as my example of people with different skill sets above. It appears that by saying something that could be considered positive about a democrat I've pierced through a very thin skin.
What should "line of sight" mean when you're able to look out from the drone's cameras?
It means that plane that comes from a direction out of the narrow field of view of the camera is not seen by the operator. In other words, a very stupid risk to take if there is anything else in the sky where it is being flown.
It's not, just a way of pointing out that lawyers will laugh if you try to put more effort into chasing them for money than was obviously put into the initial project. It's yet another symptom of IT often being treated as on the fly basket weaving instead of anything resembling engineering. If you've got to spend a lot of effort assigning blame then it's likely that not enough care was taken with the project in the first place.
He didn't call himself that they navy called him that. What's the motivation for this attempt at Soviet style revisionism over something so trivial? Why the incredibly thin skin and the lack of morality in your reaction?
Slashdot Mirror
You may have read that, but reality is shit like systemd hanging indefinitely waiting to detect a wireless mouse dongle (noticed it was hung booting and rebooted after five hours, then pulled the dongle and rebooted again). The parallel idea didn't happen.
The rage is due to it being perpetually a half finished sack of shit expanding into other areas before the existing ones are fixed. It's more rage at poor implementation than the idea itself.
Clonezilla does a bit of compression on every file system it understands so it's fairly quick in most situations as well as being easy to use in most situations.
It even has "photorec" as part of the software in case you want to restore deleted files.
Now that is even more pathetic - it takes a special sort of "define your own reality" type to have "their own facts". It's not some shit I've made up or bent out of shape for some "mass debate" game but instead just a link to something I don't "own", a historical footnote that is nowhere near contraversial just to illustrate a point that could have been made other ways.
You've wasted so much time here jumping in to defend some revisionist loser who was willing to lie to argue about an analogy. Why? What is the rules of the game? How do you score? How utterly pathetic do have have to be to play it at other people's expense like you are and make this site far shittier in the process?
Instead of playing such a stupid fucking game why not amuse yourself reading this instead:
http://www.amazon.com.au/Short-History-Stupid-decline-reason-ebook/dp/B00MWHQKFI
The challenge came nowhere close to refutation and was just a silly word game and straight out dishonesty. The only thing interesting at this point is why people stoop so low over something so trivial and why you jumped in to try to play some silly little troll argument game debating against reality.
Funny thing - Chinese Gooseberries are called "kiwifruit" and they are shipped in to Beijing from NZ for less than trucking them in from another part of china.
Then there's weird stuff like the energy costs to run a dairy in the north of the UK being high enough that in both economic and fuel consumption terms it's less to bring the milk in from New Zealand. That's a sign of how much the ships can move.
There are plenty of other reasons to buy local but the pollution one doesn't fit anymore.
Pretending that a Hollywood studio is communist requires a great deal of complexity - but Rand had a grudge!
Most of the book can be reduced to a cry to bring back the Tsar and the Russian nobility to run wherever Rand is standing: notice how jailbait Dagny was special due to her family connections and that was enough? Don't get me started on Rear-Done metal and the pathetic bullying scene of putting a government representative in his place for not serving the true blue-bloods.
I'm sure you understand the USA ten times better than Rand with her pathetic screed against capitalism and democratic republics.
Bullshit. Students drive fill-in shifts in a lot of places.
Doing it properly was also a legacy of WW2. The medical examinations of British enlisting revealed a nation of many sick and unproductive people and that the economic benefit of well run health care would far exceed the cost.
You are learning Grasshopper. Doing it for everyone is not communism, just as vet hospitals are not communism. "Commercial realities", as in rent seekers not wanting to lose their cash flow, have put a lot of money into pockets to ensure that the sort of health care available to returned soldiers is not available to all with economies of scale that would reduce the profits of the rent seekers.
It works both ways - Hollywood jobs bled to Canada, Australia etc because the taxation costs per position covering healthcare are much less than if they had to pay for healthcare coverage for each position. The US system is not to the benefit of either employees or employers.
In Australia for instance they just refused a compromise deal where they have to pay the same tax everyone else does - so they are guilty of tax evasion. The article today is behind a paywall (australian.com.au) but google will probably turn up something that is not if anyone cares enough to go looking for that example instead of others.
You beg on the streets, but that's "the American way" in the eyes of these folks.
Ridiculous - the filter is that you can call up and complain. You are digging beyond the bottom of the barrel here. With the vast number of posts you've spammed us with based on more and more flimsy bullshit it's looking like you are a "social media worker" paid by the post and pretty crap at content.
That is what an ambulance is for in places where getting things done counts for more than "small government".
Why stop at that? Go to those disaster areas and loot - if the owners are dead you are not hurting anyone. Why travel when you can graverob at home instead? Your "it's OK to exploit people who can't find easy alternatives" may be what you see as "the American way" but only from the most amoral of the bunch in "Deadwood".
The flipside would be not being able to get a taxi at noon due to a lack of profit in it.
Uber are pricks a dozen ways and demonstrate yet again that any *ism uninformed with morality sucks.
That sort of idea of offering exclusive rights to offering a service dates back to King John is not earlier. Those governing make money out of it and those who buy the rights have a barrier to keep competitors out. I'm not defending it just framing the issue and pointing out why those that have paid to be inside the barrier are pissed off by others that do not have to wear the same costs.
Near where I am Uber has just refused a compromise deal where they have to pay tax - the same goods and services tax that every other company in the country has to pay on transactions. They seem determined to remain outside the law and just influence those in power to look the other way.
With you daily Uber stories/ads. You suck cock for money. Whores.
There's a class of people whose most profound fear is that, somehow, somewhere, somebody is making a profit.
Making a profit without paying tax on it. That class of people that are afraid of it are the class of people that are running governments, whether we like it or not.
Uber is a "fuck you, we are taking over and taking all the money" sort of bunch, which should be kept in mind even if those that they are displacing are as bad or worse.
A couple of posts up I provided the link, a quote, and bolded some text for the slow.
When someone equates their gut feeling and a desire to run down the opposing team in a pissing contest to an actual fact there's no point pretending that such a lie is real - especially over something so incredibly trivial as my example of people with different skill sets above. It appears that by saying something that could be considered positive about a democrat I've pierced through a very thin skin.
How naive can you get?
What should "line of sight" mean when you're able to look out from the drone's cameras?
It means that plane that comes from a direction out of the narrow field of view of the camera is not seen by the operator. In other words, a very stupid risk to take if there is anything else in the sky where it is being flown.
It's not, just a way of pointing out that lawyers will laugh if you try to put more effort into chasing them for money than was obviously put into the initial project.
It's yet another symptom of IT often being treated as on the fly basket weaving instead of anything resembling engineering. If you've got to spend a lot of effort assigning blame then it's likely that not enough care was taken with the project in the first place.
He didn't call himself that they navy called him that. What's the motivation for this attempt at Soviet style revisionism over something so trivial? Why the incredibly thin skin and the lack of morality in your reaction?