Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Upgrades Are Being Forced On Some Users (arstechnica.com)

grimmjeeper writes: According to Ars Technica the Windows 10 upgrade option is being selected by default for some users. A dialogue box is appearing that only permits them to reschedule the upgrade process, not cancel it. "For the first year of its availability, Windows 10 is available for free to most Windows 7 and 8 users, and Microsoft has been trying to coax those users to make the switch by delivering the operating system through Windows Update. Until now, the OS has been delivered as an optional update; while Windows Update gives it prominent positioning, it shouldn't be installed automatically. This system has already generated some complaints, as Windows Update will download the sizeable operating system installer even if you don't intend to upgrade any time soon, but, over the last couple of days, the situation seems to have become a little more aggressive. We've received a number of reports that people's systems are not merely downloading the installer but actually starting it up." Update: 10/16 11:35 GMT by S : Microsoft said, "In the recent Windows update, this option was checked as default; this was a mistake and we are removing the check."

374 comments

  1. Serves you right... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...if you leave windows update on automatic.

    1. Re:Serves you right... by cjb658 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So I just just set my mom's computer not to automatically update? Her computer will never get patched if that happens.

    2. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have to babysit automatic updates to keep it in line. It should just provide automatic updates in the background - set and forget.

      Now in reality you do have to, and I do on my windows laptop (and yes, windows 10 was automatically checked last time I search for new updates), but you shouldn't *have* to.

    3. Re:Serves you right... by kheldan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From what I've been reading, it doesn't matter if you turn off Automatic Updates or not, it still goes right ahead and downloads and attempts to install itself.. just like any other malware.

      Here's an idea: Find the executable in the Win10 install package that's run, go into it's Properties, Security tab, set 'Deny' for 'Read and Execute' for 'SYSTEM'. Should prevent the installer from running. If the OS changes the permissions against your express wishes, or it just keeps downloading new copies, then Microsoft is violating their own system security scheme; in that case, if it wasn't already time to get out, now it'll be time to get out and find a different OS. I've never been a huge fan of Microsoft (have managed to never pay for a single legal copy of any version of Windows) but I've put up with it. This behavior from them takes the cake, though; I'm done. The next box has to have something other than Windows on it. I can't tolerate an OS that countermands my express wishes and takes away all control from me like that.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    4. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will only get worse! M$ will eventually update all systems with Win7 or Win8 on them whether the user wants to or not. No setting in Windows will stop it, only wiping Windows from the hard drive will stop this crap! Just more and more reasons to NEVER EVER EVER EVER TRUST M$!

    5. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to know the truth? Get an XP box with no updates connected to the internet without a firewall? Countdown to infection is around 30 to 45 seconds!

      I saw that paraded so much that eventually i tried it, and no it is complete bullshit.

    6. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set Windows Update to "select updates using third-party website".

      The file has the easy format
      KBxxxxxx true
      KByyyyyy false

      so there are tons of constantly-updated lists on the web to choose from. Pick one you like instead of Microsoft's default of "all true". Then updating can be automatic and correspond to your expectations. </wish>

    7. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's modded up because it's shining the light on the troll it's in response to. GP ain't saying he's going to proudly do that, GP is saying "is that really a good idea?"

    8. Re:Serves you right... by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      It should have read:

      So I should just set my mom's computer not to automatically update? Her computer will never get patched if that happens.

    9. Re:Serves you right... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      clear her system, disable updates and have a good backup plan so you can always restore from read-only media (yeah, dvd) anytime you want.

      seriously. disable updates and have a good backup/restore strat and test it to be sure you can do a restore.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Set her machine to never check for updates. Whenever you come over to visit, just do a check for any new updates and avoid those which are dodgy.

      If regular or semi-regular visits are out of the question, install TeamViewer (free for personal use) on her machine and do it remotely once in a while.

    11. Re:Serves you right... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1, Troll

      clear her system, disable updates and have a good backup plan so you can always restore from read-only media (yeah, dvd) anytime you want.

      seriously. disable updates and have a good backup/restore strat and test it to be sure you can do a restore.

      Seriously, Windows doesn't give a rats ass if you don't want to update. I've had several that have just happened, no choice on my part other than not connecting to the internet.

      Choices, many of them, only none for you. I would bet my life that Enterprise phones home whether you like ot or not

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:Serves you right... by Barny · · Score: 2

      No, just go into optional updates, select the windows 10 install update and right-click "hide update".

      Bam, it won't auto-run.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    13. Re:Serves you right... by Black+LED · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...until Microsoft has another "accident".

    14. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. If automatic updating is on, then every item that can potentially auto-update has already auto-updated, by definition.

    15. Re:Serves you right... by Barny · · Score: 0

      No, you are the idiot. If that were the case then it has already installed and you CAN'T turn it off (in windows 10).

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    16. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The risk is rarely in the OS. It's in the browser and its plugins. It's also in people not being careful with email. Most of all, it's with enabling javascript. I don't run Windows Update on XP or Win7. I haven't used AV for years. I *do* use a firewall. I don't have Flash installed. Nor Acrobat Reader. Nor Java. And I disable script whenever possible. I've never had a malware problem on any machine. I don't understand how it became normal for people to act as beta testers on a constant dripfeed of OS changes and consider that to be a security measure.

    17. Re:Serves you right... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 0

      I tested it in 2004 with a fresh XP (no SP1) install and it was infected in less than one minute. This was done on a small shop test bench, outside the office firewall. We never even had to fire up Internet Explorer.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    18. Re:Serves you right... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Want to know the truth? Get an XP box with no updates connected to the internet without a firewall? Countdown to infection is around 30 to 45 seconds!

      I saw that paraded so much that eventually i tried it, and no it is complete bullshit.

      You aren't as right as you think. There was a time when a fresh install of XP was indeed infected before updates could be downloaded from Microsoft. That pretty much ended with SP3. Actually, I think it was addressed with SP2, but the first SP2 also broke XP on AMD machines, causing an endless reboot cycle. Naturally I was quite biased against SP2 for that reason.

      Just because your experiment failed doesn't mean that the stories are lies. I experienced that "complete bullshit", thank you very much.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    19. Re:Serves you right... by chipschap · · Score: 5, Informative

      I did that (hide the Windows 10 install update). Guess what? When I "check for updates" it's back, and selected by default. What are also back are the other updates I've hidden that backport telemetry to Windows 8.1 (although they at least aren't force-selected for install). Hiding does no good.

      I have Windows 8.1 on a partition for use when I absolutely can't avoid doing something under Windows (thankfully not often). Otherwise I never even touch that steaming pile and run off my Linux partition, where I can get work done without having to watch my back, not just for hackers, but to protect myself from the vendor that wants our trust and does everything possible to lose it.

    20. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? We're discussing whether the Windows 10 installer auto-runs in Windows 7/8/8.1 . If automatic updating is on and the Windows 10 installer is selected by default by Microsoft, then the Windows 10 installer will auto-run as soon as Windows Update is aware of the update. There is no window of opportunity where you can "select the windows 10 install update and right-click hide update" so that it won't auto-run.

    21. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead and turn off all the security features of any OS (save for OpenBSD) and chuck it outside of a corporate firewall and the same thing will happen.

      It isn't the os that is lacking. It is your defense in depth. I run intentionally insecure systems for testing purposes on an internal network. Ever heard of damn vulnerable builds? Not one logged attempt against them in thousands of hours.

      If you cant keep an insecure machine safe within your own network you are wholly criminally negligible and really have no business in corporate security.

    22. Re: Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's true - last night I put my OSX Macbook to sleep, opened it this morning to find Windows 10 installed. And it didn't even have Wi-Fi on, damn thing came in over Bluetooth!

    23. Re:Serves you right... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      To use a widly targeted and popular OS like WIndows without AV and updates is batshit insane for any system to be connected to the internet. Want to know the truth? Get an XP box with no updates connected to the internet without a firewall? Countdown to infection is around 30 to 45 seconds!

      Windows by default = stealth mode firewall. Vast majority of residential users = NAT. Classic time to own scenario and arguments well past their sell-by date.

      I question any user who says proudly he does not update his computer with a smile who calls himself a computer geek. I hope the Russian hackers who put flash ads with malware have not cleaned your Mom's bank account yet

      Trash flash.

      Oh that is right I bet you are probably one of these users who thinks if you do not install software you are 100% safe and no exploits in flash, chrome, IE, or in javascript that of course will never get patched

      Not keeping browser patched is asking for it.

    24. Re:Serves you right... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      From what I've been reading, it doesn't matter if you turn off Automatic Updates or not, it still goes right ahead and downloads and attempts to install itself.. just like any other malware.

      I've been a bit of a MS supporter (check my post history), and brushed off most of the criticism around the MS-hate. However the tracking behaviour of Win10 has crossed the line. I've just upgraded my Win7 laptop to Linux Mint (I still find it clunky, but does the job for web/email). I can no longer support a company that disregards its customer's privacy so blatantly.

    25. Re:Serves you right... by kheldan · · Score: 0

      No setting in Windows will stop it

      As I already said: You should still be able to prevent Windows from executing any executable file through 'Deny' permissions being set on the targeted file -- and if Microsoft is somehow circumventing their own filesystem security in order to force Windows 10 down everyone's throat, then it really is time to start over with a non-Microsoft operating system.

      I should also point out: I work for a -- AHEM! -- major microprocessor manufacturer, and they have Enterprise versions of Windows 7 all over the place -- and none of them have been force-upgraded to Windows 10; it is more than possible to prevent the forced upgrade from occurring, you just have to know how to do it.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    26. Re: Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well isn't that great, Microsoft is doing no wrong so long as you, ahem, work for a major microprocessor company and therefore know what you're doing. Guess it sucks just to be some pleb user with delusions of choice though!

    27. Re: Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can confirm this.
      In my case bluetooth was disabled but it did not stop M$.
      Yesterday someone broke into my appartment and psysically installed windows 10 on my computer.
      This has gone to far!

    28. Re:Serves you right... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      From what I've been reading, it doesn't matter if you turn off Automatic Updates or not, it still goes right ahead and downloads and attempts to install itself.. just like any other malware.

      Have you submitted samples to anti-virus companies? Anyone here able to add detection to ClamAV?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serves you right for using a toy OS like Windows.

    30. Re:Serves you right... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      While I suspect the Windows 7 -> 10 autopatch is actually a bug, I will point out this- Enterprise plays by TOTALLY different rules. In Enterprise Win 10, you can disable auto updates. In Pro (and the free Home) 10, you can NOT do so without all manner of hacky-sack.

      Enterprise Windows 10 is kind of still an OS. You can't buy it as an individual, of course.

    31. Re:Serves you right... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Without javascript I believe you can't log in to many websites, including some major webmail.
      Perhaps you use a mail client. Maybe have some free mail service you subscribed to before they closed it off because they can't manage 1 million+ accounts.
      I want to do like you do, but I would end up with a monthly email bill and reloading the whole page to load or display slashdot comments.

    32. Re:Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enterprise versions don't get the "free" upgrade, that's the reason none of them have been upgraded. Volume License customers (the only onces who can even get the Enterprise version) should have gotten the Windows 10 installation media, but Microsoft leaves it up to them to decide when, and even if, they want to upgrade. Microsoft gives them a choice because a lot of these are multi-million dollar contracts, so they don't want to piss off their Volume License customers. That's also the reason the Enterprise version is the only Windows 10 version that you can completely turn off telemetry.

    33. Re:Serves you right... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The trick is not to block all JavaScript, just most. For example, for this page I'm allowing 2 out of 10 scripts origins, slashdot.org and fsd.com. Not perfect but helps security and gets rid of stupid videos and other ads.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    34. Re:Serves you right... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      with no updates

      That pretty much ended with SP3.

      SP3 is an update.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    35. Re: Serves you right... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Last week Windows 10 infested my router, my 3 Linux PCs (one of them had a dead battery) and my smart TV. Fortunately it wouldn't run on my router or ten year old laptop, so I was able to download fresh virus definitions for ClamAV and remove it all.

    36. Re:Serves you right... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Same thoughts here. When/if WinXP/2003 finally becomes nonviable (and the only way I can see that happening is if the majority of the internet vs older browsers becomes the chokepoint) -- sorry, I've tried Win7 and 8 and wasn't amused, and it is MY computer, not Win10's computer, so we ain't going there. This led to another of my periodic spasms of testing linux distros, and I was pleased to find a few are finally approaching my usability standards for an everyday OS. Mint is tolerable if, as you say, a bit clunky. PClinuxOS is pretty promising too (try the fullmonty edition). I still prefer WinXP but come to it, at this point I could live with linux... so long as KDE 4.x still runs. Wasn't at all impressed with KDE5, and none of the other DEs does it for me.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    37. Re: Serves you right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing! My computer got Windows 10 while locked in a concrete bunker, with no network connections and surrounded by a Faraday cage. The download happened via ultra-low bandwidth processor heat signature signaling.

    38. Re:Serves you right... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Unless it's bootstrapped on the install media.

    39. Re:Serves you right... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Windows doesn't give a rats ass if you don't want to update. I've had several that have just happened, no choice on my part other than not connecting to the internet.

      Choices, many of them, only none for you. I would bet my life that Enterprise phones home whether you like ot or not

      Troll? Looks like the shills have mod points tonight.

      You can do as you will, but it's the truth. I have a Windows Ten system in a sacrificial computer on my desk. Windows 10 Professional. And Windows forces updates on it although I have it set to delay them and notify me. It asked a few times, now it just does updates without any input from me.

      Only in Windowsworld is the truth trolling.

      Not very surprising, I suppose.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    40. Re:Serves you right... by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      Are/were there actually routers that didn't default to NAT?

      Because NAT is enough to kill all the probes that can infect or bluescreen a post-install Windows.

      (I got hit by a post-install bluescreen on Win2k when I happened to re-install with NAT disabled. I disconnected the ethernet cable and redid the install.)

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    41. Re:Serves you right... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It is still an update, it is just an update that is loaded on the install media then.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    42. Re:Serves you right... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      An update it may be but there is a very VERY specific difference in the possible attack vectors. Splitting hairs does not help the topic at hand which is how to install Windows and make it secure.

      The GP is quite right that installing Windows XP with SP3 bootstrapped likely means that he didn't get owned when he first connected his computer to the internet to download updates.

      On the flip side I remember one day with a vanilla Windows XP machine the first thing I had to do was download an update to windows update before I could even download the service pack. Computer got owned before that initial update even finished.

    43. Re:Serves you right... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You really should expand this whole thread and read it from top to bottom.

      Want to know the truth? Get an XP box with no updates connected to the internet without a firewall? Countdown to infection is around 30 to 45 seconds!

      I saw that paraded so much that eventually i tried it, and no it is complete bullshit.

      You aren't as right as you think. There was a time when a fresh install of XP was indeed infected before updates could be downloaded from Microsoft. That pretty much ended with SP3. Actually, I think it was addressed with SP2, but the first SP2 also broke XP on AMD machines, causing an endless reboot cycle. Naturally I was quite biased against SP2 for that reason.

      SP3 is an update.

      The original thread was XP without updates gets pwned within a minute. Someone trotting out how that isn't true with SP3 doesn't change anything, that is an update, XP without updates still gets owned in less than a minute as sp3 is an update and doesn't count as XP without updates, so doesn't change anything about what was said.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Heck of a Mistake! by geek111 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article - 'In the recent Windows update, this option was checked as default; this was a mistake and we are removing the check.'

    That is one heck of a mistake!!!

    1. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Bovius · · Score: 1

      They had to go out of their way to change how the Windows Update code behaved to make that update checked by default.

    2. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. Remember that other, recent, "accidental" update they were pushing too?

      This isn't an accident. Microsoft knows that the Windows 10 rollout has been a failure so far. Running a huge Windows 10 marketing campaign, giving away the upgrade, tricking people into installing it and now trying to force people to install it...and it still has a shitty adoption rate.

    3. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a load of BS since John Thompson already said he wanted to force this update on us. Since he is head of Microsoft, chances are good that the company will do what he demands.

    4. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      In that this seems like an option no one should ever be checking at all, ever.... this is something users need to decide on. There are still some incompatibilities, and honestly I still prefer the Windows 7 UI, the new start menu is obnoxious, just less obnoxious than the old. Not to mention that the "control panel" is now hidden behind a fully useless UI that lets you do nothing at all useful and hte right click menu has the stuff you really want.

    5. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      I read the title and thought "No kidding! All updates on Windows 10 are mandatory now. This is news?"

      Read article. Seriously? Leave it to Microsoft to piss even more of their users off. I swear, sometimes I think they're intentionally running the ship aground.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw it last week, Windows 10 upgrade was automatically checked in "Optional Updates".

    7. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by MrNaz · · Score: 2
      --
      I hate printers.
    8. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Even numbered Windows versions and odd numbered Star Trek movies. Everybody knows to stay away from them.

      What everybody doesn't know is that if you put all of the even numbered Windows versions and odd numbered Star Trek movies on a hard drive, it will create a supercritical suckular fusion reaction, and the hard drive will spontaneously implode into a singularity of failure.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    9. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering it was a "free" upgrade that was actively pushed in peoples' faces, only 75 million is pretty fucking sad. Now what about the other billion Windows users who haven't installed Windows 10?

    10. Re: Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a year. Not everyone is stupid enough to upgrade to 10.0. Many are trained to wait for first Service pack, or at least the next major update. There will be a jump in November and next July.

      No, no failure so far.

    11. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not for any of those companies, but nice strawman.

    12. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      failure ? what ?

    13. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Resistance is futile.

    14. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're still trying to force KB3035583 (installs the Get Windows 10 app) down our throats as an "important" update. Third time this has popped up for me. Even after hiding it before. They're trying really hard to bypass our intent on this. Time to nuke the hard drive of this attempted productization of our own hardware.

    15. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article - 'In the recent Windows update, this option was checked as default; this was a mistake and we are removing the check.'

      In future Windows updates, the optional check will simply be removed to avoid confusion.

    16. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      That is good but I have some VM's that run long term simulations. They can't be paused or restarted and weeks worth of data would be lost. So if a forced upgrade and restart causes us to lose data then someone will be hearing from our lawyers.

      But probably not. The vms are off the network so mickysoft can't force anything on them.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    17. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, this is what MS sent Elop to Nokia for, and got him back.... Maybe the "DESTROY COMPANY" Box was still checked because noone updated his mission statement...?

    18. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That may seem huge to you, to Microsoft its only about 7% of their user base if you go by the OS usage statistics shown on Wikipedia. Most Windows users still use Windows 7.

    19. Re: Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more I see about Windows 10, the less I am interested in an update. I use Windows 7 on one computer and Windows 8 on another, but I think I will pass this "free" update. I removed all telemetry stuff that was back-ported and sneaked into Windows 7/8 (by "essential" updates like KB3035583), and thus I am really are not very interested in Windows "keylog" edition 10..

      So - no update. Not in November and not in July. Thanks, but no...

    20. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even numbered Windows versions and odd numbered Star Trek movies. Everybody knows to stay away from them.

      Even Microsoft QA knows.

      "You call this piece of junk Windows 9? This is not a Windows 9. Call it Windows 8.2 or Windows 10, we don't care, but DON'T call it Windows 9".

    21. Re: Heck of a Mistake! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 5, Funny

      The more I see about Windows 10, the less I am interested in an update. I use Windows 7 on one computer and Windows 8 on another, but I think I will pass this "free" update.

      People used to make jokes that Linux is free, like a puppy. It seems like Windows 10 is free, like syphilis.

    22. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm curious - if it's that critical why is it running on MS instead of Oracle/solaris, linux, *bsd or any of the other stuff known for stability and far less overhead? If a lawyer goes to them saying "MS whatever crashed after only a couple of weeks" the MS lawyer will just laugh and point at the bit in the fine print about fitness for use and how they don't accept responsibility for anything that critical.
      I have geophysical stuff here running for weeks, and there are two main things to consider:
      1/ Snapshots so you can restart if something goes wrong and software that supports using those snapshots so you can restart at the day eight snapshot or whatever.
      2/ An operating system that does very little apart from what you want it to do, thus no background stuff adding an extra few percent (thus several hours) to a long job.

      MS have not been interested enough in such a space to make any serious sort of effort to occupy it. Using it for the task is like making car assembly robots out of LEGO.

    23. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would upgrade if they just removed the telemetry and spying. Introduce an option to disable it, that's all that is required. Then the techies will be on board, and adoption will increase.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      I flagged it as malware in my anti-virus program. It's still being downloaded but quarantined immediately after it starts, so no harm done.

    25. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      You should be a little bit burnt though. What's to say it won't turn itself back on? Or that you'll need to bend over to get the service pack? The Windows 10 policies are super hostile.

    26. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      The "bsod per day" craptitude is one thing. But you could make a case that intentionally forcing an unwanted update is on another level entirely. Wilful interference, misuse, sabotage etc - the terminology varies from place to place but it's the same thing.

      I don't think any EULA that tried to exclude malice would be worth the paper it's printed on.

      But IANAL.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Success!
      After being annoyed by the recurring check in the 10 upgrade, (and almost another unwilling download) I finally went to "change settings" (on the left of the update panel), and unchecked "Give me recommended updates the same way I receive important updates", as well as "who can install updates" and "software notifications" (the last two may not have been necessary). After two hours, and repeated openings of the control panel/windows updates, the troublesome tick appears to be finally slain. We'll see if they find another way to re-select the "feature" that we obviously all want.

    28. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I have to disagree about the Star Trek movies. Star Trek III was pretty decent. However, you really have to think of it as the bridge between Star Trek II and Star Trek IV; the three go together as one continuous story arc, especially the latter two. Star Trek IV doesn't even make sense if you didn't watch III first.

      ST 7 and 9 weren't horrible movies either, they were just blah. ST9 (Insurrection) really was more like a 2-hour TNG episode than a movie, and not one of the better ones either. But at least it wasn't as awful as that TNG episode with Riker in a coma. Even the episode's writer says that episode was utter shit.

    29. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They DO have an option to disable it. Are you really naïve enough to trust Microsoft to honor that setting, and not change it at the next update?

    30. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Leave it to Microsoft to piss even more of their users off. I swear, sometimes I think they're intentionally running the ship aground.

      I think they're intentionally testing to see just how far they can push their idiot users before they really abandon them (which is really, really far). Everyone has made themselves so dependent on MS that they're just not going to leave, no matter what, so MS has finally realized this and is exploiting it. Face it, most people don't want to pay the price premium for Macs, and they refuse to install Linux even though it's free, so they'll put up with as much abuse as MS decides to dole out.

      When a "victim" refuses to leave their abuser, do you really feel sorry for them?

    31. Re: Heck of a Mistake! by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      > No, no failure so far.

      Microsoft is behaving like it is a failure. For me, they've gone from the small bubble popup, to stand-alone advert windows taking up half my screen that I can't just Esc to close, instead I have to click the X button.

    32. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by martinfb · · Score: 1

      Well, yeeeaaahhh! And, Microsoft should be held accountable, and PAY for repairs! If this were enforced, it is very likely these "mistakes" would not occur! i.e. If WE the people allow corporations to make "mistakes" w/o repercussions, then WE the people get what we deserve! I'd rather not be one of these peoples!

      --


      Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
    33. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7% in only 2 months? That's pretty damn good actually.

    34. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's less than that. Windows 10 doesn't even have half of the marketshare of Windows 8/8.1, and that was not only an OS that people reviled but also cost money.

      If Windows 10 had SOLD that much in 2 months, then I'd be impressed. Given away and forcefully pushed out? Not so much.

    35. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can see, none of the privacy options in Windows 10 actually work. It still sends the same data.

    36. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not even being prepared for even something as mundane as a prolonged power outage or some idiot unplugging the server from a UPS to do a workplace heath and safety cable check is a sign of not taking things seriously when it's something that will take a long time to redo.
      Sorry to be blunt, but if you are running multi-day stuff with a risk of losing days of work due to a crash or power failure it is a toy operation instead of anything resembling professional work. Sometimes it's the fault of the vendor making a toy instead of serious software, but either way someone in the chain is just playing instead of working.

    37. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That's like saying it's OK to shoot someone if they've got terminal cancer.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Audi) "Gee we really need to get our pollution numbers down so we look good. Hey I know, let's cheat!"

      (Microsoft) "Gee we really need to get our Windows 10 adoption rate up so we look good. Hey I know, let's cheat!"

    39. Re:Heck of a Mistake! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's not, just a way of pointing out that lawyers will laugh if you try to put more effort into chasing them for money than was obviously put into the initial project.
      It's yet another symptom of IT often being treated as on the fly basket weaving instead of anything resembling engineering. If you've got to spend a lot of effort assigning blame then it's likely that not enough care was taken with the project in the first place.

    40. Re: Heck of a Mistake! by strikethree · · Score: 1

      People used to make jokes that Linux is free, like a puppy. It seems like Windows 10 is free, like syphilis.

      If I did not already have such an awesome .sig, I would use this as my .sig. You nailed it bro. Nothing but net.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  3. Forced upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft seems really, really interested in installing this new version on everyone... I wonder why.

    1. Re:Forced upgrades by sexconker · · Score: 2

      A National Security Letter will get almost any corporation to play ball.

    2. Re:Forced upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that Microsoft is becoming irrelevant in today's world. They are getting desperate because the Wintel empire is crumbling.

    3. Re:Forced upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like all versions of Windows: it should only ever be run in a VM

    4. Re:Forced upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one I won't even run in a VM. I upgraded from 10 to 7 and I won't be reinstalling 10 ever. It's a crappy OS that does a ridiculous amount of spying.

    5. Re:Forced upgrades by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      A National Security Letter will get almost any corporation to play ball.

      Perhaps that's what's making them push it so hard...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    6. Re:Forced upgrades by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Win7 extended support doesn't end until some time in 2019 or 2020 IIRC... they don't feel like waiting that long to start locking people into the Windows subscription system.

      Shit like this is why I keep automatic updates off and just do a "patch day" once a month or so...

      Guess it's time to start thinking about going full FOSS - but Photoshop and MS Office and Visual Studio... :(

    7. Re:Forced upgrades by gtall · · Score: 1

      National Security Letter? So the U.S. government is forcing MS to force Winders 10 adoption making systems more bulletproof to nefarious snooping by the same government. Brilliant! You should be in pictures!

    8. Re:Forced upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but Photoshop and MS Office and Visual Studio..." either do work under Wine or will in a year or so. If you think you will upgrade MSO/PS/VS before then and this version won't be Wine compatible, what are you doing working with these tools that are insufficient for your job now? If they ARE sufficient, why won't they still do the job in a years' time?

      And how often do you use pantone spot colours anyway? And most professional print shops take RGB natively, so CYMK isn't necessary.

    9. Re:Forced upgrades by LVSlushdat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm gonna go out on a limb here and opine that MS has been "asked" to help fill up that big new NSA data center in Utah, and they really really need EVERYBODY to be running Windows 10 (or 7/8/8.1 with the spy-ware addons) to fill up that big beautful treasure trove of OUR data...... Tell me my tinfoil hat's too tight, I don't care.. Thats what it looks like to me... Thank goodness I've given up sucking from the MS tit, and moved all MY systems to Linux...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    10. Re:Forced upgrades by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Only if it's a talkie.

    11. Re:Forced upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      National Security Letter? So the U.S. government is forcing MS to force Windows 10 adoption so the NSA can key-log every computer.

      FTFY

  4. Resistance is futile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will be assimilated.

  5. Media Center by sanosuke001 · · Score: 2

    My only PC I haven't upgraded requires Windows Media Center to record TV; add media center to Windows 10 and I'd be happy to upgrade from Windows 8. Otherwise, they can go shove it.

    --
    -SaNo
    1. Re:Media Center by ohieaux · · Score: 1

      If I could find a suitable alternative to Windows Media Center, I'd switch as well. I'm afraid I'll be one of those who switches, reluctantly, on the last day.

      --
      Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.
    2. Re:Media Center by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Here here....

      I understand that Silicon Dust is working on a product that will do the same thing as Media Center (including DVRing protected Cable Card content). Anybody know how they are doing on this effort?

      Once we have a solution, I'm going to ditch windows for media center about as fast as I can boot from the Linux install media. I am SO tired of this windows mess, it's been a total pain..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here

      LOL, idiot.

    4. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is mythbuntu still good? My mythbuntu box is still working great, but it's a decade old install that hasn't been net connected in a long time, so I'm not really up to date on the current status of the distribution. Worth a look though.

    5. Re:Media Center by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. Originally a shortened form of "Hear him, hear him!" to vocally express agreement and encourage others to listen to someone. As opposed to simply enthusiastically announcing your presence ;-)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Media Center by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'll work on my word usage... (Dang English and all the Homophones.... )

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:Media Center by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I understand that Silicon Dust is working on a product that will do the same thing as Media Center (including DVRing protected Cable Card content).

      Let's hope that it isn't as much of a system pig as View is. I have two systems talking to a HDHomeRun with a three tuner CableCard. I could run three instances of QuickView to watch three things at once, but on the same systems I cannot run even one View without image breakup.

      And if it has the same unintuitive counterproductive UI that View has, it will be DOA.

    8. Re:Media Center by jrumney · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I could find a suitable alternative to Windows Media Center

      Kodi?

    9. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kodi don't record - still need another app to pull it off tuner cards.

    10. Re:Media Center by Megane · · Score: 1

      I have a Windows 7 laptop that I use for playing a few games that require the GameOS from Redmond. Since I don't use it for e-mail or general web browsing (and when I do, I don't use one of the major three or four browsers), so my attack surface is a lot more limited than the average user.

      That being said, I use it for playing games, and some of those games have problems with Windows 10. So after Windows Update "helpfully" downloaded SIX AND A HALF FUCKING GIGABYTES of Windows 10, and it took me two hours to remove it because it was stored under ACL permissions such that even an Administrator user couldn't delete the files without learning how to fix those ACLs... so yeah, last month I set updates to full manual. And since I can't trust them to not hide another one under some boring generic description like "This update improves the Windows user experience", I haven't yet bothered to check for updates since.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re: Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then what's this PVR/DVR shit in kodi, then?

    12. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kodi and NextPVR for the recording back end works all right. Its still not a nice as WMC, but if you want to move to Win 10 it will do the job just fine.

    13. Re:Media Center by tepples · · Score: 1

      Is mythbuntu still good?

      Last I heard, it didn't support CableCARD tuners.

    14. Re:Media Center by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      It works but it can't do SDV or encrypted (non copy-free) channels.

      --
      -SaNo
    15. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave the iPhone out of this!!!
      Sorry, couldn't resist... ;-)

    16. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the last device you want to move to win10! MS are analysing your media, creating hashes of your files and reporting back to base. Ever downloaded something from a torrent site? MS will know about it win10. Don't be surprised to find some of your movies/tv shows "corrupted" 18 months down the road.

    17. Re:Media Center by dbIII · · Score: 2

      This is where we need someone to add those last few features to VLC as a plugin or something instead of just hoping for someone caring within the MS media player group. I'll bet the people involved with the earlier media player are long gone and the ones there no don't have the time, resources, skill or the care factor to implement to features in the old version.
      Yet another argument against closed software. The people with the source code to the old version are not going to use it or let anyone else use it. They have taken their ball and gone home.

    18. Re:Media Center by dbIII · · Score: 1

      "helpfully" downloaded SIX AND A HALF FUCKING GIGABYTES

      That would fill whatever is left of the SSD I have Win7 on to play games.

    19. Re:Media Center by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      You know what's funny? I have this little Asus Transformer laptop with Win 8.1 on it and wouldn't mind updating it to Windows 10, but no option to upgrade has shown up in the past few months. Instead I'm being pestered to upgrade my old Windows 7 desktop system which runs a lot of software that is known not to work properly on Windows 10 at this time.

      Very annoying.

    20. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MythTV. Can require a bit of fiddling to set up but it's great. And the fiddling is actually quite fun (I assume you're somewhat geeky and enjoy working with computers ?) and you can learn quite a bit of Linux in the process.

    21. Re:Media Center by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      If I could find a suitable alternative to Windows Media Center, I'd switch as well. I'm afraid I'll be one of those who switches, reluctantly, on the last day.

      Have you tried crape paper and a comb?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    22. Re:Media Center by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      If I could find a suitable alternative to Windows Media Center

      Kodi?

      Can't record HBO or anything off of cable with the CCI flag set to "Copy Once." And this has been pointed out over, and over, and over again.

      WMC has a non-subscription EPG, supports CableCard, and records protected content. Either meet those specs or stop pretending that the systems are direct alternatives.

    23. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If using as a DVR, windows media center cannot be beat for a pure software solution.

    24. Re:Media Center by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I would expect that they simply used some GNU licensed GUI and not go to all the trouble of rolling their own, but Silicon Dust doesn't seem to be talking too much about this yet.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    25. Re:Media Center by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You won't meet those specs in software because no one will spend the money on licences. Even Microsoft with their billions did it once and didn't think it worthwhile.

    26. Re:Media Center by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      You won't meet those specs in software because no one will spend the money on licences. Even Microsoft with their billions did it once and didn't think it worthwhile.

      WIndows XP MCE
      Windows Vista Home
      Windows Seven Home
      Windows 8/8.1 Home w/ MCE pack

      That's more than once. And they still work. I'm still running Seven Home and 8.1 Home. So those specs have, in fact, been met and still are met.

    27. Re:Media Center by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      If the are still being met why not upgrade to Windows 10?

      See my point? The license wasn't worth it. Also licenses are perpetual and require renewal, so yes, "once".

    28. Re:Media Center by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      Also licenses are perpetual and require renewal, so yes, "once".

      You realize that what you've written is insolubly contradictory, as well as wrong. What 'license' did Microsoft take that is perpetual and applies to all future versions of Windows? What license did I take that requires renewal?

      Windows Seven is still in extended support. Windows 8.1 will have extended support until 2023. Windows XP MCE and Vista Home still work even without extended support.

      You don't even run this software. You're hardly qualified to say what the situation is.

    29. Re:Media Center by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No I don't, but I know the reason why support was dropped, cost, MS has all but flat out said so using lovely marketing words involving the terms license, customer research, few users, etc. But you don't need to trust me on this since I'm unqualified. Go do some research yourself.

    30. Re:Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not just the missing features it is the quality of the playback (BTW, not codec quality that is another issue). Media Centre excelled in that regard while VLC has a long way to go.

    31. Re:Media Center by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      I tried that first, actually. However, it doesn't support SDV and anything but "copy free" content. Most of the channels from my provider are either SDV, copy-once, or copy-never. Only the over-the-air content (like 10 channels) are usable with MythTV.

      --
      -SaNo
  6. Lawsuits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many employers require staff to run earlier versions of Windows to maintain compatibility with certain software. I could see how this could severely interrupt workflow if pushed too aggressively.

    1. Re:Lawsuits? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Many employers require staff to run earlier versions of Windows to maintain compatibility with certain software. I could see how this could severely interrupt workflow if pushed too aggressively.

      I don't think this happens on corporate networks that use WSUS. Doesn't happen on ours, we don't even get a chance to upgrade to 10. Which is decidedly a good thing. Microsoft may be crazy, but they're not stupid.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Lawsuits? by careysub · · Score: 0

      ...Microsoft may be EVIL, but they're not stupid.

      FTFY

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    3. Re:Lawsuits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Oh, it happened to a friend of mine with a multi-million dollar machine where their Windows 7 upgraded to Windows 10, broke the HMI and made the machine completely useless for almost a week until the manufacturer could send a replacement HMI (Yes, thank Siemens, Beckhoff and Allen Bradley for their major use of Windows for industrial machines). I'm waiting to see if one of those Bechoff PLC's that run Windows 7 upgrades to Windows 10, that would be quite humorous.

      Enjoy your misery with Windows. I made sure none of my machines run anything Windows. I don't know why people bend over backwards for manufacturers thinking they won't sell them a machine when the manufacturers actually will bend over backwards to you to sell you their machine despite your demands.

    4. Re:Lawsuits? by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

      Really. It upgraded all by itself, despite the fact upgrades require operator intervention? And nobody thought to roll the upgrade back, despite the fact it's a big advertised feature of Windows 10 that you have a month to decide whether you want to keep it?

      Windows 10 sucks, it's bug ridden, slow, and a memory hog, but let's at least have believable criticism used against it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Lawsuits? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "And nobody thought to roll the upgrade back, despite the fact it's a big advertised feature of Windows 10 that you have a month to decide whether you want to keep it? "

      You do know that most rollbacks tend to not fix the problem, yes? It's been like this since ME.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  7. Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft better curtail this.

    Remember the last round with the Web browser, and later the media player? Small potatoes. Imagine what happens when someone running bootcamp runs this and borks their Mac. Or someone dual-booting Linux and completely obliterating the Linux partitions.

    1. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      Yeah I remember. What happened? Big fine, got appealed, long story short - nothing happened except some lawyers got paid. Microsoft can afford plenty of lawyers. Bring on round 2 and I dare you to expect anything different. TOO BIG TO FAIL. Remember those words? It doesn't just apply to banks. Someone decides to force Microsoft to pay a real hefty fine and some politician will show up (like Nancy Pelosi did for GM) and say "Oh gosh no, we can't break MICROSOFT!"...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by EmagGeek · · Score: 0

      Please explain why you think this is anti-competitive?

    3. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      The Win10 "upgrade" shouldn't affect a Linux install at all.

      I don't know about on other machines, but on my laptop the upgrade didn't even touch the grub install. Grub was still installed and booting both partitions, both after I "upgraded" to Win10 and when I "downgraded" the partition back to Win8.1. And here I never thought I would say switching to Winows 8.x would be an upgrade....

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    4. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by spauldo · · Score: 1

      You'll have a hard time making the "anti-competitive" argument, considering they're overwriting their own product. Bricking some bootcamp installs (if it happens) is more grounds for a class action suit.

      And as far as Linux goes - has Microsoft ever suggested that dual booting is supported? I know their loader is technically capable of it, but being capable of it and supporting it are different things.

      The web browser suit was completely different. Microsoft won (for a while) the browser war, and did so by leveraging their monopoly. We all suffered because of it - Microsoft squandered their opportunity and let web standards degrade so badly non-tech people moved to a different browser.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    5. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Guarantee me that all my 3rd party software will work 100% fine after the new update. If not, it's anti-competitive.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

      company uses extremely dominant market power and subversive behaviour to gain favourable business terms. Seems like the very definition of anti-competitive (note: anti-competitive does not have to be illegal)

    7. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Win10 "upgrade" shouldn't affect a Linux install at all.

      That would make it the first Windows version to not trash the Linux boot loader. Ever since Windows 95, we always needed to have a boot disk ready, to restore the bootloader.

    8. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as far as Linux goes - has Microsoft ever suggested that dual booting is supported?

      What they say is totally irrelevant. If they cripple existing dual boot systems or prevent Linux from being installed without a profound technical reason, then it's clearly anti-competitive behaviour. And the fact that dual booting is perfectly feasible illustrates there there is no such technical reason.

    9. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      No, it's like saying that you take your car in for a 20,000 mile service call and they replace it with an entirely different car that only runs on a certain road that exists in Alaska. You use the OS to run your programs. If it doesn't do that, it's useless.

    10. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the EULA? If they're overwriting their own product,why the hell did I have to pay for it? Can I get the money back for the product they took away?

    11. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Who care if it's anti-competitive or not? What are you or anyone else going to do about it? If you're not willing to switch to a better vendor, then you have only yourself to blame; MS has made no attempt to hide their anti-consumer ways. If you think the government is going to make them behave, then you are ridiculously naïve.

    12. Re:Welcome to Anti-competitive practices 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]Guarantee me that all my 3rd party car parts will fit my new car. If not, it's anti-competitive.[/quote]
      If those parts were made specifically for your model of car, as software is specifically made for Windows, then yes, it is anti-competitive.

  8. Thanks, Microsoft by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And by "thanks" I mean, "thanks for nothing, you pricks."

    I'll happily stay on Win 7 until my PC breaks and it can't be fixed or until I get hardware for which there are no Win 7 drivers. Then it'll be time to switch to Linux, perhaps an Unbuntu distro or Mint, which I've heard good things about.

    MS knows i"m not alone in feeling this way, and apparently my desires conflict with their business plan.

    So I might as well ask now, what distro would people recommend switching to for a desktop box? Or better yet, which ones should I stay away from?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do it, do it do it...

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    2. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss windows XP. On modern hardware it is really fast!! Also no such thing as secure.

      I like ubuntu, or edubuntu.

    3. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give Linux Mint a try in a VM.

    4. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People will say all sorts of things, but I would do one of the Ubuntu derivatives. I personally enjoy the lightweight and less flashiness that Xubuntu offers, but many people are happy with Kubuntu (KDE) and others will stay with standard Ubuntu.

      They all use the same software repositories for the most part and all work mostly out of the box with tons of hardware with little to zero effort.

      I too am on Windows 7 and only really stay for a handful of applications. It is quite tempting to just install Xubuntu then reinstall Windows 7 inside of a virtual box for the applications I can't get to run with wine or similar.

    5. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by bigfinger76 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mint is an Ubuntu fork. And it is wonderful.

    6. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mint. Lots of apps, well-tested, easy to use. Ubuntu has a bit of the tablet-ified UI thing. It's fine if you're into that, but given that you skipped Win8, I'm guessing you're not.

      Most distros, Mint included, have a try-before-you-buy* deal. You can download a free trial** image, make a DVD or bootable flash drive, and reboot with it. It will boot into a full desktop that is perfectly usable (but very slow - it's reading from the DVD drive), so you can get a feel for things without committing.
      You can even install the trial image alongside Windows for more extensive testing. Every time you boot up, you choose which OS to use. If you end up hating Mint or Linux in general, you can just forget about it and keep booting into Windows. That'll cost you ~10GB of hard drive space that you can instruct Windows to reclaim at any time.

      *Buying is free (donations appreciated).
      **Actually, you just download the full image. There is no separate "trial".

    7. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Da+Cheez · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mint is an Ubuntu fork. And it is wonderful.

      +1 to this. I actually switched my wife to Mint with Cinnamon from Mac OS. All the drivers worked without any tweaking. My wife's not technical at all, but had zero issues using the system and finds it very intuitive. She particularly likes the blend of clean aesthetics and great functionality - she's an artist, so I take her approval of the aesthetics quite seriously.

    8. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      If you were going to switch to Linux, you'd have done it already. Microsoft isn't scared of your threat.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      I take a more customer supplier route. I still with windows 7 until many customers band together and force M$ to produce Windows 10 SE with all the anal probe crap gone. This done not just as individual customers bit also as business seeking to keep the system secure and maintaining security around what ever methods provide them business advantage without M$ doing tech analysis and selling those business advantages to the highest bidder. This is a real customer threat and a huge breach of acceptable practice, something that should be directly actively tackled, not something that should be let slide but tackled head on.

      Remember this shit will be spying on peoples children in school, spying on every member of your family, spying on your doctors and dentists, spying on every business interaction you make whether you have the anal probe installed or whether the business you are dealing with has it installed and when you pass by the accidentally stick it in you. So you can not keep secure by securing your computer you actively have to work at making every computer system your private information travels across secure.

      So when M$ spies on your data on someone else's computer are they not still spying upon you without your permission regardless of what operating system you use or whether or not you even fucking use a computer!!!

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by tuxgeek · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Give a good look at PCBSD.
      The Linux ecosystem is currently in upheaval due to an abortion being assimilated by most distros, called systemd.
      The purpose of systemd is to make the Linux desktop more "windows like". It is necessary for the Gnome desktop to function. The Gnome desktop is a pile of garbage, so don't waste your time if you can avoid it.
      PCBSD will run on most hardware and is simple to install and use.

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    11. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In what way is Ubuntu tablet-ified? You can't even use the UI on tablets. It has been 'Mac-ified' with a global menu, a dock and a big icon start menu with spotlight like features. But that's OSX like features and not iOS like features.

    12. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      If you were going to switch to Linux, you'd have done it already. Microsoft isn't scared of your threat.

      I don't care what Microsoft is or isn't scared of, I'm just stating what I'm going to do.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Give a good look at PCBSD.

      Thank you, I'll take a look at it and maybe try a live CD if they have one.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    14. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 0

      There is only one thing keeping me from upgrading. A checkbox that configures the keyboard mappings so that the Windows key works and does what I expect. "Are you upgrading from Windows? Do you want your Windows key to work like it used to?"

      I want to be able to hit the Windows key along with familiar combinations. It's a very common keyboard layout, and lots of Windows users have this muscle memory.

      Sure, I could edit a bunch of settings for every distro I try, but I'm tired of it. I'm done, and I'm not trying another one. They're great, rock solid, and they just don't work the way I, as a Windows user, want them to.

      Having said that, Mint is the place to start.

      iOS users love their pointing and clicking, apparently. I spend time on the keyboard, and without a reason I don't want to touch the mouse. Is there a distro that does that well? Sure, if you're a Linux user, but I'm not.

    15. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by spauldo · · Score: 1

      Mint's a good choice if you're looking for a minimum of change. The Cinnamon desktop has a very similar workflow to Windows, and most stuff just works out of the box.

      One thing though: changing your OS, especially if you're a power user, is a huge deal. You'll run into a lot of things that will annoy you or piss you off. That's natural. Linux users tend to feel the same when they have to work on Windows.

      So if you want to change, follow through. Do your change, and make yourself stick with it for at least a year. Don't shy away from dealing with technical problems. After a while, you'll acclimate and it will feel natural. Until then, it'll feel like pulling teeth just to get stuff done.

      Someone else suggested PC-BSD. I would agree, if you're a technical guy and aren't afraid of getting your hands dirty. Driver support isn't as good, but that only matters if you have hardware that it doesn't support. There are a few programs out there that are Linux-only (Rosegarden, for instance), but those are rare. FreeBSD (PC-BSD is just a modified installer over FreeBSD with some extra software) is a whole lot cleaner and more cohesive than Linux - the base system is all part of the project, rather than a collection of separate projects. Everything is very well documented. So yeah, if you're a power user and won't mind a bit of work to get things to your liking, give PC-BSD a try.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    16. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      The way I got myself to switch permanently to Linux in 2005 was to run Windows XP in virtual box in OpenSuse and then Linux Mint. It was mostly for PS and a couple other programs but eventually the seamless window mode pissed me off and it was just around the time I was 95% using Linux to do all my computing.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    17. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Megane · · Score: 1

      My game / video player PC (with a Core 2 Duo motherboard) still runs XP, and I was forced to upgrade from W2K for one game. (Yes, I know it's a 64-bit CPU with a 32-bit OS.) With a modern (as in about three or four years ago) hard drive, I think it takes longer to get through the BIOS stuff than it does to actually boot XP.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    18. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes.. On multi ghz clockspeeds, there's NO excuse for GUI lag, even on mobile devices. Today's software is total shit.

    19. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by epyT-R · · Score: 0

      If you play games or use any industry specific software (adobe autodesk etc), you're stuck running windows on bare metal. VM kills performance, if it works at all.

    20. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS users love their pointing and clicking, apparently. I spend time on the keyboard, and without a reason I don't want to touch the mouse. Is there a distro that does that well? Sure, if you're a Linux user, but I'm not.

      Assuming you meant OS X, and not iOS:

      OS X is EXTREMELY keyboard friendly, in addition to being able to define your own Keyboard shortcuts for ANY Menu Command, both Globally and on a per-Application basis, you can ALSO use the PLETHORA of already-defined Keyboard Sortcuts, Including a full set of mouse-movement and full keyboard navigation.

    21. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manjaro is Arch-based and comes with the XFCE desktop by default. There is even a build available in the forums that uses OpenRC as a systemd alternative.

      Much slicker end-user experience than Ubuntu with Unity, IMHO. But if you do settle on Ubuntu, Mint would be the way to go though I would still recommend Manjaro (and/or XFCE).

    22. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I'm an MS user, and just switched to Linux for my web/email machine. I found Mint to easy to use, although not as smooth as Windows. Ubuntu was ok, but their fascination with brown themes never caught my interest. Others like Red Hat, Debian, Suse etc seem more focused towards server/nerd end of the market, so Mint it is for now.

    23. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear Zorin OS (Ubuntu-based distro) is supposed to be very similar visually to Windows 7.

    24. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      By that same token, if you were going to contribute something meaningful instead of buffing up your ego by trolling, you'd have done so by now.

    25. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      I thought I heard Windows 7 is getting some of those forced updates too.

    26. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest using some form of BSD instead of Linux, just because.

    27. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. If you have a VT-d enabled CPU you can run Windows in a VM at native speed.

    28. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu is becoming Mac-like, which is fine with me. As for Mint, they switched directly to Debian as their base and I think hardware compatibility has suffered as a result. The other downside to Mint is that it has no default UI, unlike Ubuntu, so tech support advice is more CLI-centric.

      I'd recommend Ubuntu overall. Just remember to visit the Privacy section of the control panel after you first install it; you may not like having it send search queries to Amazon.

      Finally, don't assume that Linux is just "PC compatible" or you may waste a lot of time. Compatibility varies greatly from machine to machine. You can use Ubuntu's hardware compatibility database to find machines that have good Linux support.

    29. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My my, have Microsoft employees become twitchy...

    30. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Can Windows 7 be installed in a VM without drama?

    31. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by nojayuk · · Score: 1

      I recently put Cinnamon Mint (17?) on an old server I got cheap, it worked like a champ. Then I added a graphics card (an nVidia PCI-bus FX5200, to fit in one of the PCI slots since the server mobo doesn't have any PCI-e x16 slots). Mint refused to boot up into a windowed environment, instead it dumped me to a command line prompt and told me something about restarting MDM, whatever that is.

      I replaced the Mint installation on the server with Windows 7. It works like a champ and it doesn't complain about the video card. Any setting and configurations for resolution etc. are done from a windowed GUI with clicky boxes and drop-downs rather than unhelpful command-line options. nVidia don't support the ancient FX5200 under Win7 but the legacy 64-bit Vista drivers went on without a quibble and run perfectly.

      I can't recommend Mint if you want to ever change anything from your default installation. Windows is much better in that case, IME.

    32. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mint is an Ubuntu fork. And it is wonderful.

      Agreed. I used Ubuntu for a long time (alongside Windows) and when they started getting kind of crazy with the Amazon ad stuff, I tried out Mint. For a "daily driver", I would say Mint is my favorite Linux choice. It's really smooth to use, very Windows-like in feel, and doesn't have a lot of the weird config issues that some distros have. I highly recommend it.

    33. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.. and it's not like we've gained much in any areas... Even stuff like simple error handling is generally still mediocre at best.

      Heh.. Captcha was "systemic"... You're telling me!

    34. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why in the fuck would you do that? Mac OS is certainly better than that tripe.

    35. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS. My wife is a designer, used Mac OSX most of her life. At one point her older macbook died so I let her borrow one of my laptops with Mint 17. She did not like it, and said it is ugly, especially the icons. She was happy to get a new macbook a month later again.

    36. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you'll switch to Linux. But you'll soon tire of the lack of quality software and constant fiddling to get things to work right, then you'll come running back to Windows.

    37. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imho listen to what spauldo said: http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

      Changing OSs like you're talking about absolutely requires a mindset change. I look at it like adopting an exercise regimen; really tough to stick with it at first, but then it becomes natural. You'll want to quit many times before getting past the hump but once it clicks you'll know it. It really is a breath of fresh air.

      Vote: Try Unity first. Then settle in w/ Mint + Cinnamon.

    38. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by CimmerianX · · Score: 1

      Mint Cinnamon. Installs on almost anything, gives you a very familiar desktop that you can work with immediately.

    39. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by CimmerianX · · Score: 1

      yes, I use win7 in virtual box that runs on my mint workstation.

    40. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say that Mint with Cinnamon is about the worst tasting distro I can imagine. (I currently run it in a VM.)

    41. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been running Mint for the last 4 years with Windows 7 as a VirtualBox VM. It has been great.

    42. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never have any success downloading it anymore.

    43. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by antdude · · Score: 1

      Unbuntu?

      Ha, I am still on Windows XP Pro SP3. Yeah, no updates and support but everything works. I don't play games much like I used to too.

      Also, I run Debian oldstable and Mac OS Xes as well.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    44. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, but it's not an issue of the multi GHZ. The OS has all the scheduling primitives needed to prioritize tasks appropriately. The problem is that all too often everything runs as 'Normal' priority and so everything fights for access to resources, with no viable way to arbitrate.

      Also, I suspect that entire classes of software (*cough advertising *cough) simply don't want you to be able to overlook them. Their entire business model is built upon being intrusive, annoying, and in-your-face. Browser lag due to advertising is a feature to those twitwads.

    45. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tux here as AC

      Mint Linux is a good Desktop to look at as well, but I am extremely biased regarding system stability, and Mint is derived from Ubuntu, derived from Debian unstable .. keyword "unstable".
      Mint code is highly polished, points A to B, but can be squirrelly and crashy as hell at a time you are doing something important. Unacceptable to me.

      Freebsd and PCBSD are stable as all hell, support a massive amount of hardware, the latest bleeding edge software, etc .. most anything you can do on M$ or Linux, you can do on either BSDs. Your computer, your way.

      FreeBSD is a bare bones system, you install the base OS and then build your DE up from there. To full blown multimedia if you wish. PCBSD is based upon FreeBSD but customized and configured for a complete desktop environment right out of the box. Very nice system.

      tux

    46. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the biggest improvement that Vista brought over XP. No more laggy UI and no more window trails. Of course Amiga OS and BeOS handled the UI correctly from the beginning.

      Android is probably the most laggy OS I have seen. Even on a high end device, simple menus can lag while scrolling through them.

    47. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mint is also one of the last diistros to avoid the systemd cancer, hope it lasts

      F*ck Micro$oft and Poettering

    48. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry to break this to you, but you married a moron.

    49. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Not if you want/need full 3D acceleration. IO passthrough still has significant performance impact.

    50. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Actually, aero increased latencies. It did replace the GDI+ stuff which was single threaded (I think) and would artifact from time to time.

    51. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by strikethree · · Score: 1

      So I might as well ask now, what distro would people recommend switching to for a desktop box? Or better yet, which ones should I stay away from?

      Ouch. Rough question. My best recommendation is to build your own. Linux From Scratch can get you kickstarted. I have done this in the past and was EXCEEDINGLY happy with it.

      That being said, I am using Linux Mint Cinnamon. It is not perfect. Maintaining a task bar on the top rather than the bottom is not simple as it will disappear for no known reason. I actually prefer my taskbar to be on the left side rather than top or bottom but you can't do that with Cinnamon. Of course, you can install whatever desktop environment you like...

      I just bought a laptop, a Dell XPS 13 9343 (dunno, don't care). It is brand new ultralight etc. Mint installed on it with only one issue: The Broadcom wireless. Since the driver is proprietary, Mint makes you choose to add it if you want to use it. Everything else was completely automatic.

      I also run Linux Mint Cinnamon on my "monster" desktop machine. Everything worked out of the box except for accelerated 3D graphics. I have an NVidia GTX 980 and the neuvua (sp?!) drivers are not suitable for playing video games. Of course, a simple search of Synaptic and a quick install later, I had my games up and running.

      I have tried numerous distributions and due to laziness, I have settled on Linux Mint Cinnamon. Least amount of hassle, High-DPI (perfect for 4k monitors), decent defaults (although why gparted is not part of the default install blows me away), and it generally just works.

      The best option if you have time is to build it yourself from source code.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    52. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you're talking about. Go read up on VT-d. It allows direct access to hardware, including your GPU. With it, you can run the latest games at full speed (perhaps 98-99% native) under a VM.

    53. Re:Thanks, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, because Vista feels much faster than XP.

  9. Time to turn of automatic updates! by bobbied · · Score: 4, Informative

    As much as I hate to do it, If they don't stop this Windows 10 push garbage I'm going to turn off the automatic updates feature. I'm running Windows Media Center on a windows 7 box and I DON'T want the upgrade, at least not until there is some option for a replacement DVR solution that can playback protected content. Please Microsoft, STOP pushing this, I don't want 10 (or 8 for that matter) so stop asking.

    I've noticed that Microsoft is getting really pushy about this upgrade thing and has pushed yet another update that has that annoying "Get Windows 10" icon even after I uninstalled and blocked the first update with it. I disabled the Icon notices, but I really would love to unload the new update. Anybody know which update this new one is?

    All this really does is convince me that as soon as somebody can come up with a Linux alternative that his fully DRM blessed to play back protected content from my Cable Card tuner, I'm switching and ditching Microsoft and their "we rule the world, do as we say" attitude.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just hide the update ... GOogle disable Win10 update or whatever there is a list of KB patches you need to uninstall, and then hide. Then you won't be prompted again.

    2. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by istartedi · · Score: 2

      I already did it, and it's a PiTA because you can't entirely trust the link that tells you what the update does. Some are obvious, like anything related to "customer experience". I hid one of those just yesterday. There are about a dozen that I need to check before I install them. My only hard tie to Windows is Visual Studio. If I set aside the time to explore a cross-platform IDE and find that I like it, this nonsense will come to an end. Sorry MS. I was with you for a long time. I don't hate you. It's just that we've gone in different directions and it's probably time we went our separate ways.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by bobbied · · Score: 2

      just hide the update ... GOogle disable Win10 update or whatever there is a list of KB patches you need to uninstall, and then hide. Then you won't be prompted again.

      Not so, I already hid the first update that did this and disabled it. Then a few months later.... THEY DID IT AGAIN! With ANOTHER update and I've yet to figure out which one it is...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There was something last week, under the "Important" updates, that was related to Windows 10 upgrade compatibility check. And of course, ALL important upgrades are given the same title "Important Update for 64-bit Windows Systems" or such, and if you look at the description it says some generic nonsense and you have to click on the "More info" button when then moves you over to the web browser before you can actually read it. Annoying because the browser is on the desktop and the windows update is on the metro screen. I'm really baffled why the last few years they've felt compelled to hide what the updates actually do.

    5. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If I set aside the time to explore a cross-platform IDE and find that I like it, this nonsense will come to an end.

      How are you using visual studio currently?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed the 'second installation' of the nag message too.

      In the command prompt, as administrator, go into c:\windows\system32\ and rename the "GWX" folder. Then reboot.

      This completely stops the nag software from running and causes no side effects, as far as I can tell. I had to do this for the earlier version as well.

    7. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Type the following in a text file:

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Gwx]
      "DisableGwx"=dword:00000001

      Save it on your desktop with the extension '.reg'. Then right-click it, 'Run as administrator', and if necessary confirm that yes, you do want to make changes to your machine.

      Tada, no more Windows 10 nagware.

    8. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      Any way, official or unofficial, to run updates offline or after examination first? There's a hack to do this in Ubuntu and Fedora, which even comes with a rollback feature.

    9. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn it off. Now.

      By the time it gets to be "too much" it may be too late - if it isn't already, for that matter.

    10. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by igelineau · · Score: 1

      You should try Qt / Qt Creator if you haven't already. IMO it's the only one that gets close to the intellisense feeling we get with Visual Studio

    11. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by samwichse · · Score: 1

      On my work machine, I uninstalled the update, and it came back.

      The original KB# wasn't listed in the installed updates list and I was also wondering what the new number to remove was.

      Guess what? I ran

      wusa /uninstall /kb:3035583

      from the command line anyway, and it was silently installed (and not listed)... popped up the uninstall dialog and the notification went away. Rechecked for updates and rehid it and it hasn't come back.

      Scummy shit.

    12. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had the nag reinstall itself, but I had to try to make it unworkable.

      1) I took ownership of GWX (the nag popup in the task tray) and deleted the files without rolling back the update from WU.
      2) I blew away the GWX scheduled tasks, not in the task scheduler, but directly from the registry. Doing so causes an inconsistent registry state that task scheduler will complain about forevermore. But it also causes WU's GWX reinstall-nag to think that GWX is still installed, preventing it from trying again.

      Boom. Headshot.

    13. Re:Time to turn of automatic updates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure...
      I trust them to honour that registry hack as much as I trusted them to honour my optout of their Win10 upgrade/assimilation program..

  10. That icon on slashdot for MS stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It had to do about Bill Gates and something about "resistance is futile"

  11. Re:Apple fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right a report from the premier Apple fanboy site, where the most minor Apple news generates dozens of stories, criticizing Microsoft...

    Ars Technica is "the premier Apple fanboy site"? Pass me some of whatever you are smoking. It must be a really powerful drug!

  12. joys of linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I see that on any of my computers it is going to take less than 5 minutes for me to get a good linux distro burned to disk/usb, and installed. After which I will spend another 5 years (like the 5 years immediately after Vista) doing what I can to reduce their bottom line both personally, and in my community. I must have introduced 30 people to the knoppix boot-disc and to ubuntu. Parents particularly liked the tux-games for their kids. Friends with businesses were more than happy to use linux/samba. I must have prevented at least $10,000 in Microsoft software purchases because of how stunningly bad Vista was. If they pull some militant 1984 crap on hardware I bought and paid for on an OS that I bought and paid for - that will also be ... stunningly bad.

  13. amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article - 'In the recent Windows update, this option was checked as default; this was a mistake and we are removing the check.'

    That is one heck of a mistake!!!

    Remarkable how mistakes are always in their favor.

    1. Re: amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Security updates and patches are great. Making an OS so broken so that the security update is to replace the OS. Priceless.

    2. Re: amazing mistakes by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      You may think that no one has used it long enough to determine whether it is better or worse than what ran before, but it started out with no other multi tab program's tabs except the most recently used one showing except for Microsoft's own, and the first version I had installed was the typical home one and since then I set it up to download insider builds and it still isn't fixed, though I'm installing the latest build now, so that may have changed, but they didn't mention it on the blog, which if I remember correctly is a little light on what they fix, instead focusing on new features. This last build crashed whenever torrent tracking software was used including Microsoft's own variation for downloading updates from peers. I mentioned the thing about the tabs, but independent windows from the same application shows up alright. The last operating system to give me this much problems was Vista. There are problems I'm forgetting though. Oh yeah, Edge has many features missing that most browsers have, but they seem focused on giving it features that no other browser has which would work better if they worked on the missing features first. Oh, yeah, the volume control has been disappearing. And despite having closed lid set to do nothing, it still responds sluggishly when I open it back up. There's also some problem with Chrome not getting the position of the mouse right sometimes, most notably with the YouTube timeline, but all the other video controls work fine.

    3. Re:amazing mistakes by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      It's not windows 10. It's windows update that was 'misconfigured.' You're just being a shill.
      Shut up, shill.

    4. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Remarkable how mistakes are always in their favor."

      Just like the BLS jobs report. It's always bullshit that makes it look like the government is creating jobs and then it gets quietly revised DOWNWARD 99% of the time later. The "mistake" always makes things look better than they are.

    5. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how is the misconfiguration "in their favour"? Or are we still at the "M$ iz teh evilz" level around here?

    6. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not windows 10. It's windows update that was 'misconfigured.' You're just being a shill.
      Shut up, shill.

      Two months ago, Microsoft automatically forced a WinX download twice on me, labeling it "important". Now it's under "optional", but whenever I unchecked it & came back to look, it would be re-checked. I'm leery about hiding it, & accidently installing Windows 10 - I use Media Center as my PVR (yes it works fine for me). I only let Win Update inform me of updates, and I check everything carefully, as one should do anyway. I don't know how auto update became enabled, although I'm hardly infallible, could be my fault. Never again.

    7. Re:amazing mistakes by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Increased market dominance for Win10 over Win7 and Win8 if even 1% of affected machines proceed to fully upgrade.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    8. Re:amazing mistakes by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Boy, I'm not updating because I use specific software that is confirmed to NOT run properly on Windows 10. (DAW software as well as various VST plugins, including expensive commercial ones.)

      Let alone the fact that every update increases the risk of system failure and not everybody can afford this. Not everybody uses his operating system just for browsing the web, using Microsoft Office, and watching porn.

    9. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but what percentage of users DO use their computer for browsing the web, using Microsoft Office, and watching porn VS using their PC with niche software from vendors who are so small they can't update their products often enough to keep up with new versions of Windows?

    10. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, why should other peoples' needs (different from mine) influence my decision to upgrade or my disappointment about Microsoft trying to force that upgrade on me?

    11. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, mistakes not favoring them just arn't publicized like this.

    12. Re:amazing mistakes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Simple: because you've made yourself dependent on a vendor who cares more about those other peoples' needs, and of course their own bottom line, than your needs or wants. Why should that vendor give two shits about your and your needs or your disappointment?

      If you don't like it, maybe you should use a different vendor. But people like you never do switch, you just bitch and moan and then bend over, so exactly what incentive does MS have to treat you differently?

    13. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAW's are pretty much universally shit. I haven't found one yet that isn't. The Linux ones are probably the least shitty of the bunch, but they lack any and all hardware support for I/O's making them basically useless.

      It's like the major DAW companies can't let go of writing kernel-space drivers and bypassing both the system's audio subsystem (which, these days, has a sub-millisecond latency) and the system's driver model (that was put there to keep shitty DMA drivers from taking down the system with endless bluescreens). They need to learn how to program something properly using the tools that are available and not making shitty, unstable, untestable, incompatible, worthless junk all of the time. Windows Media Foundation is plenty good enough for a DAW. Hell, it's good enough for video editing, which uses a few orders of magnitude more of every resource. (And yes, I've used WMF for exactly that. It's not arcane magic. It's just good engineering with a little bit of Win32 crusty build-up on it.)

      Microsoft is entirely correct to break shit out from under those jackasses. It sucks to be you, the user, when that happens, but place the blame at the feet of the morons that wrote the shitty DAW, not at Microsoft's for making a system that protects itself from bad actors (like the morons that wrote that shitty DAW).

    14. Re:amazing mistakes by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Hah, so "you don't know that our 1.0 release isn't bad *yet*, so you should assume it's good".

      I suppose you'd welcome being unceremoniously moved by some government from your home to a strange neighborhood. Hey, you really don't know the area yet, so don't be such a Debbie Downer!

      You probably would start thinking [i]why[/i] you're being moved. Well, you might start thinking why MS is being so pushy with Windows 10.

    15. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shut it with your totally batshit insane analogy. Every OS issues patches, sometimes major. If you don't like it, then make your primary computing device a toaster.

    16. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a failure on Microsoft's part. They are solely responsible for maintaining backward compatibility, which is the ONLY selling point of Windows.

    17. Re:amazing mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That user's analogy was spot on, typos aside. And your punk ass calls a correct analogy "totally batshit insane."

      The emotions you strove for are not people's takeaway. You wanted everybody to disregard the facts and go emotional on it.

      Fuck you bitch.

      http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/microsoft-has-no-plans-to-tell-us-whats-in-windows-patches/
      http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/09/leaks-show-that-microsoft-writes-release-notes-so-why-cant-it-publish-them/

      https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.html
      http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again-3569376/
      http://www.networkworld.com/article/2956574/microsoft-subnet/windows-10-privacy-spyware-settings-user-agreement.html

      http://www.technobuffalo.com/2013/08/22/nsa-windows-8-exploit/
      http://www.technobuffalo.com/2013/07/11/microsoft-gave-the-nsa-direct-backdoor-access-to-outlook-skype/
      http://winsupersite.com/windows-10/how-stop-windows-10-upgrade-downloading-your-system
      http://www.extremetech.com/computing/195592-with-windows-10-microsoft-could-move-to-a-subscription-based-model
      http://www.extremetech.com/computing/205320-microsoft-windows-10-will-be-the-last-version-of-windows
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GU5uv28a3I
      http://techrights.org/2015/07/31/vista-10-anticompetitive/
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwRYyWn7BEo
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gghj03J_ri0
      http://localghost.org/posts/a-traffic-analysis-of-windows-10
      http://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/28/microsoft-intensifies-data-collection-on-windows-7-and-8-systems/

      THESE
      https://gitlab.com/windowslies/blockwindows
      ^(have to uncomment the #'s on two url's in the hosts file per latest change)
      https://senk9.wordpress.com/checklists/windows-10-privacy-checklist/

      http://i.imgur.com/qxbyyQi.jpg

    18. Re: amazing mistakes by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      A real security upgrade would replace Windows with Linux.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  14. Hmm just noticed Win 10 upgrade con by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    is no longer showing. Nice...

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Hmm just noticed Win 10 upgrade con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm before the storm?

  15. Won't quite yet... by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

    It worked OK on a spare laptop I tried it with way back in the semi-public beta - figured out how to disable the most egregious annoyances to just act like the Windows 7 upgrade I actually want. I'll likely add a block on an external firewall where the hosts file no longer blocks for known MS data collection (spy) servers. I expect Microsoft to act evil wherever it can - nice to see them less suicidal-evil compared to Windows 8.

    Didn't apply the update to any other systems though - found too many missing drivers still from lazy/defunct manufacturers, including my Edimax Wireless AC USB I use on two of my systems If it comes down to the wire, I'll just get a new wireless USB for the applicable systems - but I really just want to wait for a better user library of replacement DLLs to bypass the usual MS bullshit while still offering the Windows 7 functionality I care about.

    Hopefully someone will make a nice open-source replacement for Windows Update, that will offer to schedule updates entirely for all users, rather than force updates or demand enterprise-level purchases.

    Ryan Fenton

  16. Those damned upgrade icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I accidentally clicked the "upgrade" button instead of the "update" button!

    Fuck! Now I have the latest version of Debian GNU/Linux installed on my system!

    Oh, wait, nevermind. Damn, I feel like I'm missing out on getting as irritated at my OS as Windows users do.

    C'est la vie!

  17. Re:real confirmation by sexconker · · Score: 1

    C:\$WINDOWS.~BT\
    Enjoy your forced download.

  18. Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    has caused me to disallow it on my network due to privacy concerns. My Wi-Fi router password does not need to be stored by Microsoft. This is one of those instances where I really thank God I know and use BSD and Linux to be able to avoid the likes of this junk. I told my wife she needs to either get a MacBook or Linux replaces the Windows 7 install. I removed the MS KBs that would allow Windows 10 to be installed and also removed the additional telemetry crap. No one but me needs knowledge of my passwords.

    1. Re:Windows 10 by nnull · · Score: 1

      Windows has forced me to leave the default PFsense firewall rules that is block EVERYTHING outgoing.

    2. Re:Windows 10 by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      It's the only way to be sure.

    3. Re:Windows 10 by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Exactly, that is really the biggest security nightmare, even worse than these forced updates.

  19. Hubris Recipe #7 by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    over the last couple of days, the situation seems to have become a little more aggressive

    I bet in a management meeting, the top boss screams out: "I want X new installs by Y, or you are outta here! I don't care how you do it, just get it done!"

    The operative phrase is "I don't care how to do it".

    1. Re:Hubris Recipe #7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until they they do this again in 18 months -- but with making windows 10 a *paid* cloud subscription!

    2. Re:Hubris Recipe #7 by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      [Boot computer...]

      Insert coin.

      [Browse internet for Linux distro.]

      Game Over
      Insert coin.

    3. Re:Hubris Recipe #7 by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I bet that's how Volkswagen got in trouble.

  20. Annoying, horrible and badly thought out by wilhil6128 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I support quite a few companies and Microsoft have created so much hassle for me recently with this, we now try to block these updates from happening, but, like most people, the first wave caught us off guard. Windows 10 is not compatible with 2nd gen i3/i5/i7 processors with internal graphics - it causes many BSOD and various system problems after about 30-90 minutes usage. Intel have not to date released a driver upgrade. Microsoft does not block these systems from upgrading to Windows 10.

    1. Re:Annoying, horrible and badly thought out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. My home server is a 2nd gen Core i3 with integrated graphics, and is happily running Windows 10. I haven't had any BSOD type problems. However it would be fair to say given it's use as a server, the integrated graphics is not used subtantially, and never for 3D stuff. It does most of it's work through Linux in a VM, and works fine for me.

    2. Re:Annoying, horrible and badly thought out by wbo · · Score: 1

      You do realize that you don't have to use Windows 10 drivers right? Windows 10 supports using Vista, 7, and 8 graphics drivers so you could just install the same drivers you were using prior to Windows 10 if you are having problems with the driver packages bundled with Windows 10.

    3. Re:Annoying, horrible and badly thought out by arobatino · · Score: 1

      I have a machine currently running Windows 7 that's not even capable of running Windows 10 (the processor doesn't support NX). And yet it nagged me to upgrade. I had to remove and hide the W7 updates responsible. It would be nice if those updates would check the hardware before nagging or doing the download.

  21. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Mine is set to ask me before downloading and I still ended up with the nag icon and a 5gb folder you can't delete unless you boot from other media.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  22. TrueCrypt FDE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone using a TrueCrypt encrypted system partition tried upgrading to 10?

  23. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Remeber years ago on this site when not performing OS updates was a sign that you shouldn't be allowed near a computer?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  24. Windows 10 Great on 5 but upgrade kills 1 by clay_buster · · Score: 2

    We have 6 machines. 4 of them upgraded no problem. One had a legacy bios / efi upgrade problem. Windows 10 is nice, an improvement over Windows 7. Everyone here really likes it.

    The 6th machine on the other hand is a single partition machine that has gone from XP to 8.1 without a hitch. Windows 10 repartitions the disk and leaves it unusable (RAW) every time the upgrade runs. Auto upgrade there would wipe out the machine :-(

    1. Re:Windows 10 Great on 5 but upgrade kills 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I can see it here. Very interesting, very interesting. Can you type your credit card number also? Thanks!

      Your friendly Microsoft "uncle"

    2. Re:Windows 10 Great on 5 but upgrade kills 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Way to miss the point. Nobody cares if you think it's a great upgrade 5 times out of 6, the issue is the arrogance on display where Microsoft treats your systems as if it were theirs and resorts to outright trickery if you balk.

      I don't know your local laws, but where I come from it's actually a criminal behaviour. It's called "arbitrary conduct" and carries a penalty including fines or jail up to six months.

      Not the kind of trust inspiring behaviour you'd expect was necessary from the people responsible for delivering the foundation of your system for maintaining confidential information, among other things.

  25. Well, Back to Win XP by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Couldn't be any worse.

  26. The UPGADE is Heck of a GREAT DEAL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it. Windows 7, and 8/8.1 are just lame MS offerings compared to the GOD created windows 10 system. Sure the upgrade is horribly painful, and if it fails 15 times in a row, don't worry! You will be compensated when you call India 3 times for support and they send you a Windows 8.1 restoration system on a USB stick which allows you to restore you system after windows 10 upgraded corrupted your box like there was not tomorrow. When you realize Belarc Advisor isn't giving you a real KEY, but some OEM key that apparently you have NO RIGHT TO USE. So when you google and everyone say "Do a clean install and it will work", well it does, but the damn OS won't activate with my Belarc Advisor found OEM key. So, what can you do to get legal? I had to down grade back to windows 8.1, install all of the drivers an crap; download Windows 10 Home from MS downloads, burn it to a USB stick, reboot the system, run setup off of the USB stick, and select clean install from the 3 upgrade choices. This who upgrade to windows 10 is obnoxious! After 20 tries and two weeks of hassle, I finally got it write. Good luck to fuken everyone else. Buahahahaha.

  27. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    You actually have automatic updates ON?

    WTF?

    Don't you want to KNOW what's going to be loaded onto your computer BEFORE it breaks something?

    What kind of moron would use Windows of all Oses with all it's flaws and with Windows 7 now freaking 5 years of exploits all ready for Hackers to steal your credit info?!

    Somebody who wanted to have his Cable Card tuner feed a DVR and be able to play protected content and not pay the Cable company boat loads of cash each month for their crappy set top boxes. Windows Media Center is the ONLY game in town and it runs best on Windows 7. I run it because there are no other options. As soon as there is another option that works, I'm jumping off the Windows ship.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  28. Drama or reality ... by MacTO · · Score: 1

    I certainly have no interest in upgrading. My only Windows PC is used for gaming, and some light work when I want to use a larger screen. I'm happy with the setup, and don't want anyone except myself to mess around with it. Thus far, this has proven to be the case even though some people are reporting very different experiences.

    Which leaves me wondering: are these reports over dramatized or do they reflect actions on Microsoft's end? I certainly wouldn't put it past Microsoft. They certainly have a multitude of motivations to move their customers onto the latest OS. On the other hand, it is possible for these reports to be honest and misrepresent Microsoft. Windows is a complex OS and it is possible to inadvertently misconfigure things or misread a prompt, resulting in undesired results without really realizing how it came about.

    1. Re:Drama or reality ... by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      Reality. Just ran intothis. It lets me select updates, but the install is replaced with a "Download Windows 10" button, and it keeps checking the box for windows 10 for installation no matter how many times I uncheck it. Awful behavior.

    2. Re:Drama or reality ... by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and when I saw this and unchecked it I was genuinely afraid that it would install Windows 10 anyway.

  29. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    You actually have automatic updates ON?

    WTF?

    Don't you want to KNOW what's going to be loaded onto your computer BEFORE it breaks something?

    Do you? Unless you have a test system to load the updates one at a time and determine if they break anything, You are just spitting into the wind here.

    So, who has time to test all these patches at home anyway? Unless you do it at work and already know, who's going to take the time to test EVERY patch that MS puts out on Tuesday? So what do you prefer? Unpatched machines or waiting until I can find time to validate all the patches? Sometimes you just have to hold your nose and patch, hoping for the best. This is JUST my DVR we are talking about... If the worst happens, I have a backup image and it only takes an hour to dump it onto the box again and I loose all my recordings.... It's not like a mission critical part of the space station or something, it's TV shows for crying out loud.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  30. kb3035583 is the update for the windows 10 loader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hide this update and you should never see the get windows 10 thing, at least until they reissue it again and it gets removed from the hidden updates(again)

  31. How's Netflix working for you in Media Center? by bogie · · Score: 1

    Fuckers ripped it right out of Media Center. Gee thanks, wasn't using that or anything.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:How's Netflix working for you in Media Center? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter to me.. My Media Center PC isn't connected to the TV at all, it just sits on the network up in the closet. Everything runs though 'Media Center Extenders" running on older Xbox 360's. I just load the Netflix app onto the 360 when I want to use that.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  32. They were right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Windows really IS a VIRUS.

  33. Steam Machines are coming... by mykro76 · · Score: 1

    The launch is only days away. Coincidence?

  34. Seen this myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patch 3035583 (the Windows 10 system tray pusher) is attempted to download twice if you "hide" the update forcing you to hide it twice. I've also seen 7 computers that were on an active directory domain controlled environment that were told to automatically download and install updates but not to prompt for the next version of windows automatically download and install Windows 10 and come in the morning to it prompting for the initial setup screens.

    I'm tired of all of the industry bullshit. We need a decent competitor that doesn't play these games.

  35. Wow.Win 10 TP won't boot now. by Wild_dog! · · Score: 2

    Went to fire up my Windows 10 VM today. It was a technical preview which allows me to upgrade to a full Windows 10 Pro version, but I am locked out. First it said it was outdated, Then it quite updating altogether.
    Now it says a component expired and I need to hit F8 for recovery except nothing happens with F8.

    A tad frustrating.

    1. Re:Wow.Win 10 TP won't boot now. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's documented behavior. The following is a table of TP build numbers, the date expiration warnings start, the date the licence expires and needs to be upgraded, and the date where it will refuse to boot. If you're an insider you need to do perpetual updates. That's the whole point of testing the latest version.

      9841 4/2/15 4/15/15 4/30/15
      9860 4/2/15 4/15/15 4/30/15
      9879 4/2/15 4/15/15 4/30/15
      9926 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10041 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10049 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10061 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10074 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10122 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10130 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10158 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10159 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10162 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15
      10166 9/17/15 10/1/15 10/15/15

    2. Re:Wow.Win 10 TP won't boot now. by Wild_dog! · · Score: 2

      I had it set to do perpetual updates, but at some point it broke.
      It said it would update, but then the update would crap out.
      Ah well. I fixed it all and got my new Win 10 Pro working on my VM using the following instructions someone had on the Insider Forums.

      (Mine was Build 10162 and the following worked quite well!!!Back in the 90's this approach was fairly standard with dated installs that would expire. In order to update if you messed up on some dated install, you would just roll back your system clock.)
      It's pretty simple.
      ----------------------
      How To Upgrade Windows 10 Build 10074 to Build 10240 If You Get An Error When Attempting To Install (Works 100%, should work for other builds)

      Right-click the clock in the taskbar and click Adjust Date/Time.
      Turn off internet synchronization.
      Change the date to anywhere in the month September (or any time between April 29th and October 1st). The Windows Update error may change if you have gone far back enough, however, this will not matter.
      Reactivate Windows by going into Settings, clicking the link that says Activate Windows, and activate using the product key 6P99N-YF42M-TPGBG-9VMJP-YKHCF.
      Download the Windows 10 Media Creation tool.
      DO NOT upgrade directly with the tool. Instead, create a Windows 10 installation media.
      Once the tool completes the creation, start the setup program (from the install media you created). If it asks you to install updates, DO NOT have them installed, because of the same reason as above.
      Run the tool. If it tries to install updates and it gets stuck, then things were not done correctly. Close the update window (using Task Manager if neccessary) and follow the directions more closely.
      It should now start installing.

    3. Re:Wow.Win 10 TP won't boot now. by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      You can turn back the system clock to make it boot (then NTP it to the proper value). Too bad, it still refuses to update, throwing an error.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Wow.Win 10 TP won't boot now. by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Thanks, That is what I ended up doing following the process below which was on the Microsoft Insider Forums.
      I haven't had to do this kind of thing in years. This type of approach was routine back in the day to keep some software working.
      **
      ----
      How To Upgrade Windows 10 Build 10074 to Build 10240 If You Get An Error When Attempting To Install (Works 100%, should work for other builds)
      **this worked with 10162 as well using my iMac and my Parallels desktop Insider install. I didn't need to activate it since mine was activated already, but not functioning.

      It's pretty simple. I figured this out when helping somebody. This also works

      Right-click the clock in the taskbar and click Adjust Date/Time.
      Turn off internet synchronization.
      Change the date to anywhere in the month September (or any time between April 29th and October 1st). The Windows Update error may change if you have gone far back enough, however, this will not matter.
      Reactivate Windows by going into Settings, clicking the link that says Activate Windows, and activate using the product key 6P99N-YF42M-TPGBG-9VMJP-YKHCF.
      Download the Windows 10 Media Creation tool.
      DO NOT upgrade directly with the tool. Instead, create a Windows 10 installation media.
      Once the tool completes the creation [of the install media], start the setup program. If it asks you to install updates, DO NOT have them installed, because of the same reason as above.
      Run the tool. If it tries to install updates and it gets stuck, then things were not done correctly. Close the update window (using Task Manager if neccessary) and follow the directions more closely.
      It should now start installing.

  36. Is it auto installing on pirated keys? by mjensen · · Score: 1

    Just wondering.
    If the key is listed as pirated, a good thing would be to auto download and install.

    1. Re:Is it auto installing on pirated keys? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you use a pirated key for your old Windows, the Win10 upgrade will go away and leave you alone...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Is it auto installing on pirated keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I can confirm regular Windows 7 installations with DAZ Loader work like a charm for upgrading to 10.

  37. Annoyed into upgrading by Ogive17 · · Score: 0

    My wife and I both had Win 7 ultimate installed, I on my desktop and her on a laptop. I see the little upgrade icon in my toolbar but have never been prompted to upgrade. Every time she turned her computer on, there would be a popup asking if she would like to upgrade for free. She eventually did it because she was tired of the pop ups.

    I don't know why her experience was different from mine. I don't have any intention of upgrading.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    1. Re:Annoyed into upgrading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. I have a Windows 8.1 tablet. I got the icon telling me that Windows 10 has been released months before it was actually released (That tablet is not on any beta/preview/developer anything). Think is, every time I clicked the icon (Windows 8.1 being crap), it switched to desktop mode, which is useless with a touch screen (that's why the Surface has an external keyboard, but mine is an Asus Vivotab with no such thing). So even if the program hadn't been lying about Windows 10 being released, I still wouldn't be able to.

      Never got to try it after Windows 10 was actually released, after a year of owning a tablet with approx 3 games and an e-mail program that only works with an Outlook.com account, I bought an Android tablet.

  38. Windows Media Center by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 1

    Anyone who uses Windows Media Center will definitely not want to upgrade to Windows 10 as Windows 7 is the last version Microsoft shipped with this great program.

    Of course Microsoft everyone using Windows Media Center to get an X-Box. I'd more likely keep my old pc, it's tv-tuners and use XMBC with NextPVR.

    Microsoft keeps making decisions which seem desperate and ill thought out.

    1. Re:Windows Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For you information XMBC is now known as kodi http://kodi.tv/

  39. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the other option is to take a principled stand against Digital Restrictions Management by doing without the "protected content".

  40. For me the Win10 upgrade disabled updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since I downloaded the Win10 upgrade I cannot install Windows updates any more. When I go to Windows Update from the Control Panel or the task bar, the only thing it allows me to do is to (try to) run the Win10 upgrade, even though I've removed all the Win10 upgrade's files and the installer no longer actually works. I haven't been able to install security updates since Win10 came out and I'm getting worried.

  41. What you lose when you click dist-upgrade by tepples · · Score: 1

    Now I have the latest version of Debian GNU/Linux installed [...] I feel like I'm missing out on getting as irritated at my OS as Windows users do.

    That's because you're irritated in another way: you're missing out on working Wi-Fi and suspend. This is what happens on some battery-powered PCs if you rip out Windows and install Debian. Source

    1. Re:What you lose when you click dist-upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be perfectly fair, Windows suspend is also useless on an Asus T100 (I have one). It's one of the first "Connected Standby" windows devices and basically if you turn off the screen but don't actually power it off, the battery will die in a couple hours from windows just running instead of suspending properly.

    2. Re:What you lose when you click dist-upgrade by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I've been having wifi problems on my Win 10 desktop. It's fine on my iStuff, my Kindle, and even my W8 laptop, but it goes down every so often on my w10 desktop.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  42. Solve it, IT style, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1: Buy a midrange computer with a quiet fan and PSU.
    2: Stick in two hard disks, leave them JBOD.
    3: Install Windows Server 2012 R2.
    4: Create a mirror Storage Space volume, ReFS filesystem on those three drives. Now, bit rot gets detected and squashed.
    5: Install WSUS and Windows Server essentials.
    6: Block the KBs that are nasty, auto-allow all security updates, and (up to you), allow the rest or block it.
    7: Configure mom's computer to back up to the server and get updates from its WSUS server.

    Done. The KBs will not get through, her computer gets backed up the right way (i.e. ransomware can't touch the backups), and an image restore is a bootable USB flash drive away.

    1. Re:Solve it, IT style, perhaps? by RoLi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That solution is only acceptable if you trust Microsoft - which I personally don't.

      In fact they clearly have the better cards in the long run, in the end you would have to treat any Windows-machine as 0wned by Panella and he has full access to the programs that run while you have none.

    2. Re:Solve it, IT style, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morons in IT: the janitors of the computing world.

  43. Say what?! by williamyf · · Score: 1

    I updated a freaking bunch of CoreDuo laptops (please notice the absence of the number 2 in the middle of the name) with intel graphics (granted, not integrated) with no issues. (you can search my past posts for the gory details)...

    It stands to reason that if such old graphics can handle win10, so can more modern Core iX integrated graphics, with some tweaking (perhaps using the Vista/7/8 drivers instead of the out of the box 10 ones, and checking that ALL your firmware is up to the latest, no matter what the release notes say).

    Yes, is a hassle, and yes, true, Microsoft should have blocked the upgrade on your machines for the time being. But, the engineers there are not omniscient, and when (as a previous commenter said) the big boss says "I want X updates by Y date no matter how", this type of things happens, and is up to us to deal with the fallout. Lucky for me, I did it as a favor, and is not my day to day job.

    I empathize with you, and do not envy your plight.

    At least, those laptops will not end in Ghana for the next 5~10 years; or so I hope.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:Say what?! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It stands to reason that if such old graphics can handle win10, so can more modern Core iX integrated graphics

      Considering the drivers are different it does not stand to reason at all.
      It is case by case.

    2. Re:Say what?! by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > It stands to reason that if such old graphics can handle win10, so can more modern Core iX integrated graphics

      Lewlz. Why on earth would you make this assumption? This is a really fucking terrible assumption. New doesn't mean better. It means new. It definitely means different, and if the code that works on things A, B, and D doesn't work on C, that's par for the course. Someone fucked up the C driver, that's all.

    3. Re:Say what?! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Lewlz. Why on earth would you make this assumption?"

      Because, Intel, much like nVidia and AMD, uses a UNIFIED DRIVER ARCHITECTURE.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Say what?! by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Lol, no way. It's not unified. It's just kinda whatever.

      "Graphics drivers for 2nd Generation Intel® Core Processors with Intel® HD Graphics 3000/2000, are not supported for Windows10*"
      https://communities.intel.com/...

      It's arbitrary what they support where. Nothing is ever compatible, or they would have one file labelled "driver", not a million ones for each different iteration in the first place.

  44. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modded -1 comment look: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8136977&cid=50684439

    The fucking facts. Modded Factual/-1. Did you think they just accidentally coded Windows 10 Global Backstab Spyware then woops dangit back-ported it to 7/8/8.1????

    Many of you [here] are not, but many people are fucking hypnotized. I suggest you tell anybody you know who has Windows installed. The Jews media isn't motivated to shine light on this for pretty obvious reasons. Don't expect an infomercial on Linux on CNBC. Anybody "too busy" or "not tech savvy" is about to click ok ok ok ok then WTF if they don't know any better.

    The only story I've seen in any hijacked-dinosaur-media was Fox news saying you can disable all of the Windows spy shit with a "free" app.

    Malware has always been free. Installing Windows 10 is called "free" but even that is a lie. You had to buy something beforehand even if it was bundled with a new PC. Tell Microsoft to fuck off. Trust has been broken for years and now it's just asinine. PC's could ship with Linux, but it's already a free download at any given time anyway.

    It's been a Linux story for years already if you haven't been living in a cave. distrowatch.com

    1. Re:CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?! by chipschap · · Score: 1

      The Jews media

      I thought your comment actually had some merit until I saw the above embedded in it. You've lost credibility, not just as a commenter but as a person.

    2. Re:CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've lost credibility, not just as a commenter but as a person.

      So you are saying fuck all of the facts, you just want to deny them. And somehow this correlates to you as it's my fault that you are not comfortable with facts.

      http://jewknowledge.weebly.com/jewish-control-of-hollywood.html

      http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

      I appreciate Foxman's concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.

      Jews always say fuck all the facts, let's deny them together. They don't understand God. Jewish right now means you deny Christ. Judaism is anti-Christian.

      They also not-so-innocuously slithered into banking and currency management. Hello 18 trillion dollars in debt.
      http://www.usdebtclock.org/
      https://encrypted.google.com/#q=yellen+bernanke+greenspan+jewish
      http://unitedwithisrael.org/act-now-declare-jerusalem-as-israels-eternal-capital/

      Is that pretty good for a cult of "Holocaust survivors" to bitch for restitution from people who weren't even alive at the time? Or are they scamming the fuck out of everybody at every chance they get?
      https://encrypted.google.com/#q=urban+dictionary+jewed

      Now you can spend your day learning about Jews since you obviously don't understand shit.

      http://www.zerohedge.com/category/tags/otc-derivatives

      http://investmentwatchblog.com/90-of-700-trillion-derivatives-market-contracts-held-by-jpmorgan-goldman-sachs-bofa-citigroup-and-wells-fargo/

      http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/02/16/who-owns-bank-of-america.aspx
      http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/02/20/who-owns-wells-fargo.aspx
      http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/02/19/who-owns-jpmorgan-chase.aspx
      http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/02/22/who-owns-goldman-sachs.aspx
      http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/02/21/who-owns-citigroup.aspx
      http://ftmdaily.com/preparing-for-the-collapse-of-the-petrodollar-system/
      http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fiatmoney.asp
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k
      http://www.bis.org/statistics/derstats.htm

      I also do not care about approval from some dickhead calling their self "chipschap" on Slashdot. Just really do not care. You came with zero facts.

      You tried to appeal to emotion and slander the messenger without specifically addressing anything, because you could not refute the facts.

      Fuck. You. Punk. Bitch.

    3. Re:CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?! by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Try refuting that you're a raving anti-Semite.

    4. Re:CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is Semite and who isn't Semite has never mattered to me in my life. You want to keep yammering though... I expected that.

      Who is Semite and who isn't Semite only matters to Israel. Looking online you find that Palestinians are more Semitic. Again, nobody outside of that region fucking cares.

      The use of anti's are misplaced as if it's some clever everlasting subterfuge. Get fucked with your anti's. The only anti that matters is that Jews are anti-Christian.

      When you are hungry do you take an anti-shit?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6dTDbDpAPc

      Mismanaging the world reserve currency into oblivion and propagandizing (read: brainwashing kids) via Hollywood, TV, mass media, and social networks (read: Facebook) while at the same time bitching about getting baked like cookies 80+ years ago just makes Israel and the Jew network look like dickheads. I am anti-dickhead. I am pro-being-not-dicks. Then you have the backstabs (read USS Liberty) and (jet fuel melts steel beams on 9/11) and then you have the "Samson Option" constant threat. There are way more to list than I feel like fucking with here at this exact moment. Pretending you don't know, go look.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel's_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy

      Like any snake charmer of yesteryear they do some retarded ass shit.
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11866467/New-York-judge-rules-that-Jewish-chicken-whirling-ritual-can-continue.html

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dzs-09Of99I
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-m0c6wlnWo

      So you should be able to tell even if it were Hare Krishna or Moonies or even Mormons ... ripping off the global population and brainwashing kids/adults... anybody in their right mind would be anti that. Semite means nothing special like a free pass to suck baby dicks and whirl chickens while you run the world reserve currency into Zimbabwe dollars.

      Ok, there. You challenged me to refute it. I am sure I did. I can elaborate at any given second. Tell me you still don't get it. Be my guest.

      Read the links above again. If you still say you don't get it you are either stupid or lying.

  45. Upgraded Laptop to Win10 by Chewbacon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was smooth at first, but now I'm seeing that was a mistake. These update issues are a real headache when I'm trying to get work done. Plus, I imaged to a bigger HD, windows would refuse to let me login. I ended up having to "reset" windows, which removes all apps, preserves user data, and reinstalls Windows. Now I can't activate it for some fucking reason. And when I reboot after reinstalling an app uninstalled during the reset, it tries (and fails!) to update. I'm not sure what's more frustrating: the cluster fuck that it is or Microsoft isn't saying shit about it.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Upgraded Laptop to Win10 by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's beta. MS won't call it that, but honestly and truly, it effectively is perpetual beta. Windows 10 will no longer update with Service Packs, rather just release updated builds; which is why the "reset" exists to preserve your copy of Windows 10 on the storage media that it's installed on and thus the user license. Effectively treating it like a mobile device via the internal OS reset option. But based on what you've said, even that option is fucked! Honestly, I'm not going to use or recommend Windows 10 for at least a year from now. I'll wait until Oct 2016 before I give it a second look.

      Microsoft really REALLY fucked up badly here!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  46. damn homos by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > (Dang English and all the Homophones.... )

    Those homos annoy you, eh?

    1. Re:damn homos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be too hard on yourself, most native English speakers in the US and UK still can't grasp when to use their/there/they're, to/too/two, lose/loose, etc.

  47. PVR/DVR options in Kodi by phorm · · Score: 1

    In my experience, that's generally been used hooking into an external software (or an external system running software) such as MythTV or an HDHomeRun device, etc.

    That allows it to manage recordings but I don't believe it has any built-in functionality for such.

    1. Re:PVR/DVR options in Kodi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes it even less clear. The first part seems to say that Kodi now supports TV tuner cards natively, but the rest then talks about add-ons just like you always needed to use add-ons.

      Perhaps what they are trying to say is that they now a a native PVR UI, but it's useless without some other software?

      If Kodi can talk to my tuner card natively (through the driver like every other video player, including VLC and MPlayer), I might give it a try. But if it requires messing with add-ons, it's not worth my time.

  48. This is only the first step. It gets worse. by Required+Snark · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Nobody is asking the right question: why is MS being so aggressive about updates to 7, 8, and 10?

    It is all a setup for Windows 11. Windows 11 will be subscription based. If you are running 10 you will have no choice about continuing to use it. You will have to immediately upgrade because 10 will stop working entirely. The 7 and 8 upgrades have a similar intent, but may have a few more ways to keep it in use because this gives legal cover for the 11 subscription model. Even so, 7 and 8 will be so crippled that they will be nearly useless. For example, even they will not be able to run non-subscription Word or Excel.

    This is so damned obvious that I am at a loss that no one seems to consider this possibility. When MS brings the hammer down don't complain that you weren't warned.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:This is only the first step. It gets worse. by chipschap · · Score: 1

      It is all a setup for Windows 11. Windows 11 will be subscription based even they will not be able to run non-subscription Word or Excel.

      This may be a blessing in disguise. People may have strong incentives or even be forced to get away from Windows once and for all. For those who truly have no choice (whether due to genuinely irreplaceable mission-critical software or corporate fiat), they will pay up on a monthly basis (no doubt 10% discount for paying a year in advance or some such).

      I'd like to believe it will send many people to Linux (sadly, not likely), but Apple is the more likely beneficiary ... unless they get on the subscription bandwagon, too.

    2. Re: This is only the first step. It gets worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I used to think like you did but now I don't. I think Microsoft is honestly going the data route. I think they will just sell your data and make a killing. They don't need subscriptions. With privacy software gaining speed, Microsoft will have a leg up spying on you from the OS itself.

  49. not in their favor.. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Informative

    ..however it fits PERFECTLY with their recent actions, so I REALLY DON'T FUCKING BELIEVE IT TO BE A MISTAKE.

    like, first they make the fucking popup come up every 15 mins or so to get you to download the update, then they port some 'diagnosis'(presumably to diagnose why people are not installing windows 10) back to 7/8, then they move to downloading the update in background regardless.

    THEN they start popping up the installer WITH ONE BUTTON.

    would MS do such a mistake? I mean, this is the microsoft that has already for few years perverted their own UI standards to coax people into making choices they want the user to make rather than giving the user a clear choice to decline, there's ample examples of that behavior such as on new windows installation making screens that have a button element and another button that's a link element that _functionally_ both act as buttons - the one that is made to look not like a button however is the choice they don't want you to make - so it would fit perfectly with that UI shenigans to make on purpose a popup that had no cancel button on it since "hey if the user closes the dialog then that counts as a cancel, amirite???".

    it's bullshit. and it's remarkable bullshit coming from a company that had nailed the easy to use window UI down 15 years ago already and should just have stuck with that and their own guidelines that they did with real science and real user studies that just were done to benefit the user, since that it has been downhill for them(really, win2k era was the pinnacle, then they started skinning and just doing cutesy shit and now even worse they started to 'guide' the user).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:not in their favor.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS: We want users to restart when updates are applied/ready, so we'll pop up a "request to restart" dialog with the focus on the "restart now" button... and with no consideration or handling for if the user is in the middle of typing a fucking essay.

  50. They are altering the deal. by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Pray they don't alter it any further.

    1. Re:They are altering the deal. by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      This deal's getting worse all the time.

  51. Re:real confirmation by bigfinger76 · · Score: 0

    The background download (confirmed) is old news. According to the summary, some users machines are reportedly starting the actual upgrade process. This would be a big deal only if confirmed. I'm not seeing that yet.

  52. Re:real confirmation by sexconker · · Score: 1

    It's absolutely confirmed by MS's own admission.
    They claim it was a mistake.
    LOL

  53. Re:real confirmation by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

    I'm talking actual users (in more of a bloc than random anecdotes from comment sections) waking up to Windows 10. From the article it seems all but inevitable; we're just not seeing it yet.

    I'd be absolutely furious. Thank heavens for unix variants.

  54. Suck it up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or ditch Microsoft already (oh, btw: Apple is no better).

    1. Re:Suck it up. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Apple (OS X) seems a lot better in a lot of ways right now. Certainly it respects privacy more and doesn't randomly key log and shit. And you can actually control it. It still has the same downsides it has always had, but these are orthogonal problems.

      From the perspective of stuff being discussed in this thread, yes, Apple is better. And so are many OSes.

  55. Well, that /is/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to get us highly intelligent folk to take it this early... lol.
    No thanks, I reaaaaalllllly can wait until they get all the bugs and privacy invasions out.

  56. One thing that puts me off ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

    One thing that puts me off is the Win10 availability notification box keeps crashing!
    WGwhatever.EXE has had an unknown error.

    1. Re:One thing that puts me off ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      happens frequently on my one win7x64pro notebook... or it was until the other week, now it just nags... i think that i liked it better when it was crashing on startup...

  57. American education system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the Windows 10 upgrade option is appearing chosen by default to some users updating there computers and a dialogue box is appearing that only permits them to reschedule the upgrade process"

    "chosen by default to some users"?

    "there" computers?

    Fucking idiots.

  58. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that sound like a technical solution, or a snide fucking comment to you?

    If you're having trouble, pretend that he was asking you to give up something you enjoy, and that you giving it up would not improve the world or yourself in any possible way.

  59. Dealt with it already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start -> All Programs -> Windows Update -> Show all available options -> Optional -> Uncheck Windows 10 Upgrade -> Right click the selection -> Hide Update -> OK. Problem resolved.

    KB3035528 (I think) is the earlier Windows update that forces this.

    1. Re:Dealt with it already by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      I've done that 3 times now. Windows Update kept bringing the selection back, with the box checked.

  60. My lawyer awaits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they try this shit on any of the systems I administer I will immediately ask our lawyers to sue them. Windows 10 is malware and I will seek unlimited damages if they install it without my permission.

  61. Malware is for Cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 10 is all malware. Malware company CEOs say developers. DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! Microsoft malware Developers!

  62. Nobody is being forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Windows 10 upgrade is a "recommended update" which means that anyone who has checked the box saying that they would like to receive recommended updates the same way they receive important will receive the Windows 10 upgrade.

    The users made that decision.

    1. Re:Nobody is being forced by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      Um, no. The option is being chosen for you without your input. Not only that, if you uncheck the box, it will be rechecked for you without your consent. If you hide the update, it will be un-hidden and rechecked for you without your permission.

    2. Re:Nobody is being forced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. The option is being chosen for you without your input. Not only that, if you uncheck the box, it will be rechecked for you without your consent. If you hide the update, it will be un-hidden and rechecked for you without your permission.

      That has been my experience as well

  63. Never check for updates for Dummies by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

    Control Panel\System and Security\Windows Update\Change settings -> choose "never check for updates"

  64. Surely if it installs itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can't have agreed to the EULA.

    A query I will have to pass on to the courts in the UK to see why I can be made to agree to something I never agreed to by the computer program ignoring my refusal.

  65. Urban Legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep a 2005-vintage Windows XP laptop in my car; it has an OBD-II readout program on it, and I sometimes use it to connect to the internet while travelling. I bought it used with SP-3 installed. I have it set up to ignore updates for fear of breaking the OBD-II program. I use no firewall, and run as administrator at cafe hotspots, within the motel, etc. I have done this for more than five years and have had no successful exploits against it.

    YMMV

    1. Re:Urban Legend by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Getting infected before installing updates was real, I had it happen back then.
      Even without running Internet Explorer to get firefox and drivers, yes.

    2. Re:Urban Legend by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Why don't you set a restore point? Then if an update borks it you can roll it back.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Urban Legend by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Restore points didn't always work - better to make a disk image of a known good working system. A full disk image is superior to most backups too.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Urban Legend by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that SP-3 is very nearly a different OS than the original XP with no service packs installed. A lot of things changed over the course of three service packs.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:Urban Legend by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that you're running XP SP3 on a connection in a closed network with firewall at one end and NAT?
      As opposed to the good old days of XP (not SP3 but XP in it's glorious original) being directly connected to a cable modem (if you had the dollars to spend) and getting one of those fancy old school publicly routeable IP address.

      I remember not even being able to install the updated required to make windows update work before my computer brought up the 30second to shutdown window which was a lovely tell-tale sign that the computer got owned by Blaster.

  66. some precautionary measures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aside from the standard /. response of (run linux|bsd).. i'll just get that oblig. comment out of the way now ;p

    this follows win7 but applies to win8 as well (win8 has more settings to flip off)...

    windows update:

    turn off recommended updates. those are mostly junk (the telemetry crap and most the win10 offer stuff falls under 'recommended' not 'important') or fuck up your system (like drivers).

    set updates to download then notify

    hide every fucking one of those that just starts with 'update for windows' instead of 'security update' (including 971033, an older one adds extra processes that verify your activations).

    microsoft is getting a little sneaky and persistent.. some kb #s end up being offered multiple times, and some have started to be changed to or released as 'important' (which autoinstalls with default windows update settings).

    microsoft really needs to actually provide a description in the update manifest instead of just generic 'resolves a problem in windows'.. especially when they don't actually fix anything (but rather, likely break shit instead) like telemetry and windows 10 shit... what the hell is in that 150+ megabyte file you download when checking for updates if full descriptions of the updates aren't in it?

    action center:

    action center settings, disable problem reporting and ceip (customer experience improvement program).

    __

    if you want to reserve a win10 free upgrade, i'd suggest imaging your drive to a spare (or use your factory recovery media on the spare.. without your original drive connected), upgrade, then go back to your original drive. no chance of the revert process failing that way, or the 10 upgrade messing with your data, drive structure, or factory utility/recovery partitions.

    1. Re:some precautionary measures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://techne.alaya.net/?p=124...

      Read it and also click on and read other related pages listed there such as https://senk9.wordpress.com/ch...

  67. Microsoft Support by Diss+Champ · · Score: 1

    I got sick of fighting 10 attempting to go in on my gaming box, the last straw being when it decided to fill up the SSD I use for the OS (programs and data on other drives).

    I called Microsoft Support. It took them some time, but they not only got rid of about 4 gig of windows 10 junk that had been downloaded to my drive, but adjusted my registry to indicate that I was not eligible for the 10 upgrade.

    I'm guessing that the registry change is the way to go for stopping 10 nagging and such.. For a few days I have been blissfully free of such things.

  68. There is a group policy that may be useful by Cley+Faye · · Score: 1

    Last night I was disabling the reboot-after-update thing in windows group policy editor, and I noticed an item that can be enabled saying roughly "Turn off the upgrade to the most recent version of windows through windows update".
    I don't remember seeing this one discussed much around the tubes, but now it might come in handy (if it does what it says).

  69. Time to invest in ReactOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like now would be a great time to get this OS up and running. An influx of cash from disgruntled Windows users will spur real development.

  70. CASL violation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Canada, forcing the upgrade would be a clear violation of Section 8 of Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation!

  71. Broke Free of the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I broke free of the matrix last night. I mean I Literally was nearly locked out of my computer. I go from top of the world happy, to ready to smash it all up mad in the space several seconds of booting.

    You want my notes? Okay I will try.
    First do all the stuff from Ghacks.
    Then. Your going to install Process Hacker 2 and enable all the plugins for tracking bad things down.
    Your going to click the Network part of process hacker and start getting rid of all the IPV6

    then services you want to disable and fix here
    net stop http and siblings. then edit the http service disabled after it's stopped here. (I know you can't just do it)
    http wdisystemhost sysmain dnscache cryptscc ikeext schedule taskschedule RemoteProcedure Call (RPC) yeah I still got a port 135!
    lanman client and servers dhcp client winhttp web proxy auto-discovery service
    fdrespub

    files:
    http.sys

    ip's:
    blacklists/cidr/robotex that crap
    mt view google
    zoner
    adobe
    microsoft
    (learn some friendly ip's too. ;o)

    fdrespub

    Ridding the UDP6, TCP6 in the Network all the way down to a pair of Svchosts.exe running some RpcSs

    THat's where I am at.

    in these keys here:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ SYSTEM\ CurrentControlSet \services\
    experimenting within the Truth Table for Servcices.
    Boot 0
    System 1
    Auto 2
    Man 3
    Disable 4

    rebooting and hating it.
    whole thing isolated via firewall for analyzing escaped packets and ports.
    The cyberwar FRONTLINE is what this is.
    You don't got to wait, it's here.

    At first this stuff I thought would be okay, but it's getting bad now.
    I notice right away trying to record live sound. A fucking pain in my ass microsoft has become.
    First the mixer API nuke from XP to 7 and then just daily fuckin malicious horse shit.

    For the fanboy peanut gallery, I have bsd/linux already, so it's not that.
    There's a fucking operating system for each fucking job on this planet.
    I have web connected win boxes that do important jobs.
    Try being in any kind of media these days without a high end NLE
    Don't tell me your bad ass video was rendered on linux. Maybe the 3d..I will give up that.
    Truth is the two best OS's was XP and then sadly win 7.
    Of MICROSOFT - Ignoring the 98SE/win3x . Nothing else is worth saving in my opinion! There was even a better DOS..
    Dos 7 or some crap I forget now.

    But ultimately, I have a worse sick fear and feeling inside.
    Look man I got boxes of MFM still on the shelf here.
    about 21 working 286 boards and all the old cards Serial, Parallel, video, audio on and on and on.
    What I am saying is I been around for a bit, I kept things FLAWLESS all these years, worrying one day this doomsday crap was coming.

    Today, I worry what about the MEDIA I generated over the years?

    What format might I store it.
    TAPE? Then there better be Tape players.
    wav avi? better be open codecs
    in hard drive? what if they change again?
    USB?
    ram?
    Chip that funk out on a cobalt stone?

    add in some back stabbing corporations, and trust at less than zero.
    not to mention an viscious anger growing at each broken windows stage.
    Trying to rationalize getting an alpha box with no spy shit cloned up like my XP is.

    Oh MF'rs.

  72. it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    although i'm not sure if i hid it properly on my dell venue 11 pro 7140 hybrid. also once it had gotten to wanting to install i selected postpone 3d or whatever it was, but next reboot a few hours later it just went ahead an started installing windows 10. fortunately everything worked. this happened back in mid-August iirc as i wasn't part of the first wave on any of my machines.

    i've also noticed on 2 notebooks win7 and 8.1 that the upgrade occasionally get automagically unhidden.

    i had been waiting for the driver situation to shake out, fortunately the hybrid is fairly standard/igpu only, intel wifi and a supported touchscreen.

  73. home group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been trying to get my windows 10 pc's to leave a homegroup.

    It's a dream I have.

    1. Re:home group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disable the homegroup service.

  74. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I think the FSF's position on boycotting DRM follows this logic: If enough people boycott DRM, this will improve the world by showing publishers that there's no longer a market for products including DRM.

  75. Mistake? by emaname · · Score: 2

    Once again proving the old adage that "it's easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission."

    It's hard for me to believe that was a "mistake."

    --
    An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
  76. What M$ should do: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have the program silently encrypt the file system table, instantly close all open programs and not allow new ones to be opened, and throw up a dialog box that says: "Windows 10 is downloading....wait" with no option to stop, and warn the user that if he/she
    shuts of the computer, they won't ever be able to access
    their files again (the key for decryption is stored in RAM only so powering the machine off essentaly means the user loses his/her files forever)

    (at least this is somethig I would love to see.)

    >:)

  77. The Doze Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could go over this for quite some time, so I'll simplify my perspective. They have a year for the upgrade process, someone is trying to make their bonus. Windows over time has taken control away from the user base, this OS is the extreme version of this. Choice is something that will no longer be offered, furthermore they are gathering data and using this data. To what extent can only be surmised by network traffic analysis as well as local machine analysis, in particular file access that being said the security risk is beyond high. The amusing part of this is that one could create a VM with BS information and let them pull that data in, further it's going to be the BEST malware deployment tool in the galaxy. Someone or a group will figure out how to get something into their systems and when that happens..... Win 7 is the last MS OS I'll have ever. I prefer nix due to your ability to control what happens and your ability to manipulate things. I high suggest to the community that we guard nix as an OS due to M$ peaked interest in it. M$ with Win10 will be making decisions for the user base, they will be using YOUR bandwidth to push out patches you pay for that....if it were the other way around they'd be suing you or looking for monetary compensation.
    The short of this is there is such a high degree of potential security issues and privacy issues that this OS should not be used, even if it is "Free" as the cost of your data equals how much in the way of monetary compensation? I would also think that it violates the EU laws on personal information, butt we will see.

  78. Tons of people are getting blindsided by this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This update works just like those stupid toolbar viruses. Remember years ago when you used to install software and every damn program wanted you to install "SomeStupidToolBarYouDon'tNeed" along with the program you were installing? People just kept clicking next without reading it because they wanted to get back to what they were doing.

    Point in case, I was talking to my mom today and at the School she works at, tons of people are bugging the technicians to fix their Computers now over this exact thing. Many got the update, just clicked next because almost no one ever reads the update on their screen, they just want it done, and now people are bringing their laptops in begging for help because they "don't like this Windows 10 thing". Good job MS.

    MS can claim they're getting "7%" of the Marketshare, but most of those people are pissed off and have no clue how to revert.

  79. Re:You have it *on*?!?!? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    On any sane OS that's still the case.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.