...to omit Mr. Evans' daft statement that the SCO site was down after being bombarded with countless emails sent by the virus.
Here's my feedback (now a 'complaint'):
I notice that you have edited this story without acknowledgement, to remove Mr. Evan's incorrect statement that SCO's website was being bombarded by countless emails sent by the virus.
I know this because I viewed the page this morning and found it laughable that someone could draw such extreme insinuations from a situation they quite obviously have no technical grasp of. Now the article has changed but the time of last update shown at the top of the page remains at close to midnight this morning.
Is this standard journalistic practise for the BBC; to continually edit and alter published reports without acknowledgement? I consider this an abuse of your position as one of the world's largest broadcasters, and until now believed you had unblemished and unquestionable integrity. It really is sad to now be in the position where I will not take your reports seriously again.
Any repect I once had for this organisation is dripping away...
You might get away with dangerous driving. But the longer you do, the more dangerous you'll get. And then you're putting people's lives at risk.
Maybe you can justify breaking the law when it comes to software. I'm sorry, you can't justify driving dangerously.
Maybe, but how do you justify measures like these in a country that has some of the safest roads in the world?
"Where are all these zillions of states hiding in a black hole?" Mottola said in a recent article in New Scientist magazine. "It is quite literally incomprehensible."
Do you seriously doubt the existence of an infinite God when confronted with the silliness these "great minds" babble about?
Just the fact that your vastly non-infinite mind cannot grasp some of the most advanced theories in Cosmology does not mean that they are 'silly'. Nor does it prove the existance of a God, infinite or otherwise.
Just felt the need to inject a bit of logic and reason there.
Slashdot Mirror
Here's my feedback (now a 'complaint'):
Any repect I once had for this organisation is dripping away...
Just the fact that your vastly non-infinite mind cannot grasp some of the most advanced theories in Cosmology does not mean that they are 'silly'. Nor does it prove the existance of a God, infinite or otherwise.
Just felt the need to inject a bit of logic and reason there.