But this is not a rights issue, it is a public safety issue. Men are not allowed to follow women into the ladies room and for good reason.
Yes, because the stalker intent on felony rape will be deterred by a non-criminal fine for entering the wrong bathroom. Nope, that logic doesn't hold. There's no reason to ban a man from a woman's restroom. I've gone in before. Grabbing an item left behind by a female friend, getting a child who didn't need help, until she did, and other reasons. Illegal or legal, in some areas, but in practice, nobody would push the issue against someone who had a genuine need to be there, unless they were born a man. That's the evil discrimination that should stop.
A man who looks like a man, and identifies as a man 100% of the time, until the one time they follow a woman into a bathroom and perform heterosexual rape on her, who then claims to be a woman to get out of the $100 fine when facing 10 years in jail is a great reason to deny rights. Because some insane shit you think up will never happen. But theoretically could, so band the gays!!
The illegal immigrants aren't trying to flee Drumpf. Many are refugees that can't get in the US's illegally strict refugee policies. They are better off being persecuted in the US (or Canada or Mexico) than being in their home country, pursued by death squads.
And 10M out of 400M? So how would you identify the 2-3% and separate them out? Brown triangles? Do you really think the country would stand by as he puts them into concentration camps?
Nearly every "promise" by Drumpf is unconstitutional, so the ones that want to flee aren't fleeing Drumpf, but the anti-Constitution Conservatives that will shit on the Constitution to harm "undesireables".
The universal health care may suck in NZ, but it's a lot better than the system in the US (both before and after Obama).
NZ is one of the better places to get sick in. The horror stories from NZ are people who "get sick" by getting a rare disease that doesn't present acutely. That's different.
Newtons's laws were right. Your assumption that you are correcting the equations to match the universe, rather than correcting the universe to match the equations indicates a poor grasp of relativity. For almost all relativistic problems (the practical ones, where one uses those equations), there exists some frame of reference where Newton's equations were right. So Newton was right in *all* cases, just not from all perspectives from all cases.
You could leave any time and get there without huge additional use of fuel. You just may not get there alive. You slinghsot around the sun. Just put yourself in a parabolic trajectory to intersect Mars. Oh, and stopping may be more an issue. But throwing a rock from Earth to hit Mars could be done, and would need no fuel expenditure in flight.
1) If you have the means to build an LEO capable rocket, it would be far more efficient to use that tech to build an ICBM and aim it at a Trump rally than to try and get yourself off-world.
The issue isn't Trump. It's the 100M+ people in the US that like him more than any other candidate. You can't clear them out by taking our one rally. You'd be better off putting the largest nuke you could find as high above the middle of the US as possible. The EMP would be felt from NYC to LA, and do serious damage from Atlanta to Denver (including Texas, and Chicago). That's the most effective way of dealing with the Trump phenomenon. Let the US go back to 1800s technology for a few years.
That won't help, because like... the atmospheres of the two hemispheres are connected.
Not strongly. I've seen projections that a large-scale nuclear war with detonations only in US and Russia would not increase the radiation levels appreciably in Antarctica, as in the years it takes the wind to get there from the northern hemisphere, the particles would have been deposited elsewhere, and the most radioactive materials will have decayed.
You are better off in South Africa than a bunker in the US.
That men can work in the childcare field and generally choose not to is Male Privileged? I don't think that means what you think it means.
Mutually exclusive statement, rendering the excuse false.
You are just being a dick. I'm interested in the time it takes to "forget" something, and have devised a test to measure this. But I have never looked into it because I'd need a couple years and a lot of money to look into it. If I go back for a PhD, that's one of the subjects and topics on the short list. So that doesn't mean I'm not interested because I haven't had time to look at it.
The great thing about America, which the SJW can't seem to wrap their heads around, is that we are Free to choose, rather be imposed upon by SJW ideals.
Yes, unfortunately you can't make the Niggers eat in the back alley anymore. Stupid Reconstruction. Go join the KKK and wear the pointy hat. Claiming all the same things, then claiming oppression by anyone who points out its absurdity. Your position is exactly the same as the KKK and other white supremicist groups. You just pretend it's different because women.
Then why all of the whining about "wage gaps"? If women are majoring in genuinely useful things, then there should be no "wage gap".
And if the majors indicate there should be no age gap, what do you propose if one still exists?
You are just blaming the victim, then calling anyone who points out your misogyny an SJW. That's good for winning an argument nobody is having, but useless if you want to discuss topics, or convince anyone else of anything.
Because tests show that woman have similar levels of aptitude and interest in STEM as males, yet avoid it as a profession. That warrants greater exploration. Some claim it's sexism. Others claim it's societal bias. If the bias exists, then something must explain it.
So are you saying that there is no bias because the bias exists, but only for good reason? That seems to be your general point.
The higher pitch of a woman's voice is easier to hear and more attention getting. Count the number of men vs women in TV ads. The men are often off (like Moviefone guy, with a very deep voice) or a celebrity, which are done to increase the attention to the add. Something a generic male voice doesn't do.
This won't get us closer to AI. A Sperm whale has a brain about 5x the size of a human, and isn't any smarter. So presuming that a larger brain will be smarter is contrary to the known facts.
And you missed the point that it doesn't deter terrorism anyway, and if it did what it should 100% of the time, it's still a waste of time/money. If it sucks regardless of whether it works properly, it was a bad decision.
You have 10 and a 20% failure rate. Yours will work more than the guy with the "approved" one which they have so few of that only one person gets them per squad, so even if it works 100% of the time, you still don't have it when you need it.
Yeah, like the porn maker who was extradited from CA to FL because the porn he made in CA and sold it in CA and it violated FL law, so they extradited him to FL to prosecute him? It doesn't matter where the law is, all 50 states laws apply to someone who never leaves his home. So say the states and the feds. But because it was "porn" the conservatives were happy to see the law applied poorly.
Soldiers walking around with broadcast devices have no ability to hide,
You mean nothing has an "off" switch? What do they do with the radios that are on 100% of the time?
they also run the risk of interception and force feeding bogus orders.
Yes, because being able to detect a wireless signal is the same as decoding the encrypted control channel. I hope you weren't in the Signal Corps.
Tech companies don't need to make money off of soldier's lives.
So it's fine if it's Northrop Grumman, but not if it's a tech company? We've paid private companies tens of trillions of dollars, and you complain about a few drones. Perspective. Find some.
For that price, they should feed back to the AR headset in real time, so the soldier can see through the hill, and call down indirect fire, and spot for snipers and such while secure.
And what happens in practice is that the 80% solution is 1/10th the cost and so you have twice as many, so there are more working than the ideal at 1/5 the cost.
The cheaper solution is generally better. You buy more, and quantity has a quality all its own.
And what if you don't rand() each result? You rand() the day, so each result is not random compared to the previous choice. Thus, watching long enough (or knowing the system it was built on and watching some shorter time), one could be able to predict the outcomes.
Slashdot Mirror
Marriage is. Common law marriage is surprisingly common. And if the State can decide your marital status for you based on "thoughts" why not gender?
Hell, businesses should be able to pick and choose their customers as they wish.
So we should go back to "whites only" stores, restaurants and such? Apartheid was such fun the first time we did it.
But this is not a rights issue, it is a public safety issue. Men are not allowed to follow women into the ladies room and for good reason.
Yes, because the stalker intent on felony rape will be deterred by a non-criminal fine for entering the wrong bathroom. Nope, that logic doesn't hold. There's no reason to ban a man from a woman's restroom. I've gone in before. Grabbing an item left behind by a female friend, getting a child who didn't need help, until she did, and other reasons. Illegal or legal, in some areas, but in practice, nobody would push the issue against someone who had a genuine need to be there, unless they were born a man. That's the evil discrimination that should stop.
A man who looks like a man, and identifies as a man 100% of the time, until the one time they follow a woman into a bathroom and perform heterosexual rape on her, who then claims to be a woman to get out of the $100 fine when facing 10 years in jail is a great reason to deny rights. Because some insane shit you think up will never happen. But theoretically could, so band the gays!!
The illegal immigrants aren't trying to flee Drumpf. Many are refugees that can't get in the US's illegally strict refugee policies. They are better off being persecuted in the US (or Canada or Mexico) than being in their home country, pursued by death squads.
And 10M out of 400M? So how would you identify the 2-3% and separate them out? Brown triangles? Do you really think the country would stand by as he puts them into concentration camps?
Nearly every "promise" by Drumpf is unconstitutional, so the ones that want to flee aren't fleeing Drumpf, but the anti-Constitution Conservatives that will shit on the Constitution to harm "undesireables".
The universal health care may suck in NZ, but it's a lot better than the system in the US (both before and after Obama).
NZ is one of the better places to get sick in. The horror stories from NZ are people who "get sick" by getting a rare disease that doesn't present acutely. That's different.
Notice, nobody is protesting Bernies 18 Trillion in proposed new taxes.
Because that's a lie. Why protest a lie? Protest the liars. Oh yeah, Trump is being protested, not Bernie.
Newtons's laws were right. Your assumption that you are correcting the equations to match the universe, rather than correcting the universe to match the equations indicates a poor grasp of relativity. For almost all relativistic problems (the practical ones, where one uses those equations), there exists some frame of reference where Newton's equations were right. So Newton was right in *all* cases, just not from all perspectives from all cases.
1) If you have the means to build an LEO capable rocket, it would be far more efficient to use that tech to build an ICBM and aim it at a Trump rally than to try and get yourself off-world.
The issue isn't Trump. It's the 100M+ people in the US that like him more than any other candidate. You can't clear them out by taking our one rally. You'd be better off putting the largest nuke you could find as high above the middle of the US as possible. The EMP would be felt from NYC to LA, and do serious damage from Atlanta to Denver (including Texas, and Chicago). That's the most effective way of dealing with the Trump phenomenon. Let the US go back to 1800s technology for a few years.
That won't help, because like... the atmospheres of the two hemispheres are connected.
Not strongly. I've seen projections that a large-scale nuclear war with detonations only in US and Russia would not increase the radiation levels appreciably in Antarctica, as in the years it takes the wind to get there from the northern hemisphere, the particles would have been deposited elsewhere, and the most radioactive materials will have decayed.
You are better off in South Africa than a bunker in the US.
We call that Male Privileged.
That men can work in the childcare field and generally choose not to is Male Privileged? I don't think that means what you think it means.
Mutually exclusive statement, rendering the excuse false.
You are just being a dick. I'm interested in the time it takes to "forget" something, and have devised a test to measure this. But I have never looked into it because I'd need a couple years and a lot of money to look into it. If I go back for a PhD, that's one of the subjects and topics on the short list. So that doesn't mean I'm not interested because I haven't had time to look at it.
The great thing about America, which the SJW can't seem to wrap their heads around, is that we are Free to choose, rather be imposed upon by SJW ideals.
Yes, unfortunately you can't make the Niggers eat in the back alley anymore. Stupid Reconstruction. Go join the KKK and wear the pointy hat. Claiming all the same things, then claiming oppression by anyone who points out its absurdity. Your position is exactly the same as the KKK and other white supremicist groups. You just pretend it's different because women.
Then why all of the whining about "wage gaps"? If women are majoring in genuinely useful things, then there should be no "wage gap".
And if the majors indicate there should be no age gap, what do you propose if one still exists?
You are just blaming the victim, then calling anyone who points out your misogyny an SJW. That's good for winning an argument nobody is having, but useless if you want to discuss topics, or convince anyone else of anything.
Because tests show that woman have similar levels of aptitude and interest in STEM as males, yet avoid it as a profession. That warrants greater exploration. Some claim it's sexism. Others claim it's societal bias. If the bias exists, then something must explain it.
So are you saying that there is no bias because the bias exists, but only for good reason? That seems to be your general point.
SJW, like "liberal" means "someone I hate" and nothing more. Those who use it are idiots who can't identify what they object to.
The higher pitch of a woman's voice is easier to hear and more attention getting. Count the number of men vs women in TV ads. The men are often off (like Moviefone guy, with a very deep voice) or a celebrity, which are done to increase the attention to the add. Something a generic male voice doesn't do.
This won't get us closer to AI. A Sperm whale has a brain about 5x the size of a human, and isn't any smarter. So presuming that a larger brain will be smarter is contrary to the known facts.
The solution to hard AI will not be direct.
And you missed the point that it doesn't deter terrorism anyway, and if it did what it should 100% of the time, it's still a waste of time/money. If it sucks regardless of whether it works properly, it was a bad decision.
If that's true, they should have issued pennies, and not spent so much on a system that won't even stop anyone anyway.
You have 10 and a 20% failure rate. Yours will work more than the guy with the "approved" one which they have so few of that only one person gets them per squad, so even if it works 100% of the time, you still don't have it when you need it.
Because the arms race has worked out so well so far?
Yeah, like the porn maker who was extradited from CA to FL because the porn he made in CA and sold it in CA and it violated FL law, so they extradited him to FL to prosecute him? It doesn't matter where the law is, all 50 states laws apply to someone who never leaves his home. So say the states and the feds. But because it was "porn" the conservatives were happy to see the law applied poorly.
Soldiers walking around with broadcast devices have no ability to hide,
You mean nothing has an "off" switch? What do they do with the radios that are on 100% of the time?
they also run the risk of interception and force feeding bogus orders.
Yes, because being able to detect a wireless signal is the same as decoding the encrypted control channel. I hope you weren't in the Signal Corps.
Tech companies don't need to make money off of soldier's lives.
So it's fine if it's Northrop Grumman, but not if it's a tech company? We've paid private companies tens of trillions of dollars, and you complain about a few drones. Perspective. Find some.
For that price, they should feed back to the AR headset in real time, so the soldier can see through the hill, and call down indirect fire, and spot for snipers and such while secure.
And what happens in practice is that the 80% solution is 1/10th the cost and so you have twice as many, so there are more working than the ideal at 1/5 the cost.
The cheaper solution is generally better. You buy more, and quantity has a quality all its own.
You don't watch the clock (seed), but watch the pattern of chosen people and deduce the next one from that pattern.
And what if you don't rand() each result? You rand() the day, so each result is not random compared to the previous choice. Thus, watching long enough (or knowing the system it was built on and watching some shorter time), one could be able to predict the outcomes.