That's why your code sucks. No structure. You could have used more structure in your life, rather than bashing those who operate better with defined goals.
The best coders understand this and spend 20% or more working as a BA, making sure that the results match the expectations. Something going to a structured program with a fixed syllabus helps teach. Rather than feral code monkeys that are flinging brown code on the wall to see what sticks.
Your inability to acknowledge that anyone could hold a valid opinion that doesn't agree with yours makes you evil. Regardless of the evilness of thought police, you are still evil.
And no, me pointing out your (or you're, though different meaning, they both work in this case) evil in no way implies any particular position on thought police.
The long and short of it is that Grayson was not committing any crime, nor contemplating any specific crime. The police approached him and paid him to commit a crime he wouldn't have if they had not both approached him and taken extraordinary effort to convince him to commit( the payment is extraordinary effort). I don't see this as an edge case. I see it as clear-cut entrapment. Had the police stayed home that day, no crime would have happened.
The recruitment process now has pamphlets of the benefits. Lines them up and sums them up, makes it sound like a $200k bonus for signing. At least when I last saw, around the time of the first Gulf War.
If you throw all the FBI agents in jail, and throw out all the convictions, were those children still rescued? Yes? Then the "for the children" doesn't matter. The government should not be allowed to actively participate in a crime. Even if "only" to catch others.
If this was a non-criminal investigation "for the children" then free the abused children. But don't use the tainted evidence in criminal proceedings.
Nope. If he doesn't think it's child porn, then he didn't commit a crime.
Entrapment would be paying someone to go to the link, when they know it's child porn. "It's a special promotion. I know you don't like Child Porn, that's why they are paying you. $10 to make an account. You don't even have to enjoy the child porn." That's getting someone not interested to commit the crime. That's entrapment.
The example isn't clear. He was asked and paid. Rarely is someone given a pamphlet with a contract. The cop walked up to Grayson. The cop asked Grayson to deliver a package (not a crime). The cop then offered to pay Grayson to deliver it (not a crime). Grayson delivered a package, and was "turned into" a drug mule unwittingly by the cop. Clear entrapment. The comic is clearly wrong. Why are you so emotionally invested in that web comic? How does it harm you personally if it has some errors?
The dust wouldn't have been as well cleared, and the same bodies that cleared them, would have pushed bits in the dense areas into collisions, resulting in more dust. And no, there's nothign in TFA about the "why", they haven't even gotten back all the "what" yet. I expect that one of the results will include a revised estimate to the age.
Private enterprise is cheaper than big government. Government is bad, so private is better. Why should the budget be wasted on the government doing things at cost, when it can be used to extract funds from people and pay them to billionaires making huge profits?
Most people require more structure. What site should you start with? What's a good end goal?
Yes, you can learn everything "college" (or coding school) will teach you from buying last year's texts at 10% of the price, and reading them yourself. But if that's as effective, why aren't more people doing it?
Veterans benefits was a throwback to a time when service wasn't voluntary. Then, because VA is not "military spending", the veterans had all the benefits separated, inflated, and are now a political, not practical, issue. VA loans, near guaranteed employment (many places have overt veteran preference, and it's illegal for the US government to hire a person to a job if there's a less qualified veteran that meets the minimums). The benefits are a lure to get people in. Because the pay is low (compared to salary in the private sector), mainly because the military doesn't include the benefits (uniforms provided, housing provided, vehicles, transportation, recreation, and other things provided). So $20k in the military would be like 40-60k in the private sector. But, since that's not well advertised, the recruiters focus on your "exit bonus" of the GI Bill, and other benefits. If the VA benefits weren't there, the recruits would reduce.
There are abuses on both sides. Those that get good benefits they didn't "need", and those who need a benefit that is provided in some form, but not in the form they need (education for this guy, housing for the homeless vets).
Yeah, they want unreasonable things like treatment for medical conditions caused by their service, or the government to live up to the promises made when they signed up. People sign up under the promise of the GI Bill and other benefits, only to see them harder to get than promised.
So the Conservatives, in order to show they hold the "high ground" are making sure to turn themselves into hypocrites, doing that which they complain of in others?
Logic like that is why I'd be a "conservative" anywhere else in the world, but not in the US.
"Putin's bitch" could have generated just as much fake outrage, and be absent fake claims of homophobia. The point is, insult the president, go to jail. We live in the Fascist Sates of America, comrade.
No. the blowjob isn't the insult, but serving putin for his sexual pleasure in a subservient manner is.
Not just gay men receive blowjobs. Not just gay men give them. And, regardless of your gender or orientation, it's considered more submissive to give than receive.
The only people who thought this homophobic aren't gay. Trump is a servant to Putin.
So, to get a conviction: The police demand a passcode. Type it in wrong until the phone breaks. Then hold the person in prison for contempt. No need for actual evidence,
Compelled speech is not prohibited. Compelled incriminating speech is. Unless your password is "IMolestSmallChildren123", then your password isn't incriminating, even if the things unlocked by the password are.
Slashdot Mirror
That's why your code sucks. No structure. You could have used more structure in your life, rather than bashing those who operate better with defined goals.
The best coders understand this and spend 20% or more working as a BA, making sure that the results match the expectations. Something going to a structured program with a fixed syllabus helps teach. Rather than feral code monkeys that are flinging brown code on the wall to see what sticks.
Your inability to acknowledge that anyone could hold a valid opinion that doesn't agree with yours makes you evil. Regardless of the evilness of thought police, you are still evil.
And no, me pointing out your (or you're, though different meaning, they both work in this case) evil in no way implies any particular position on thought police.
The long and short of it is that Grayson was not committing any crime, nor contemplating any specific crime. The police approached him and paid him to commit a crime he wouldn't have if they had not both approached him and taken extraordinary effort to convince him to commit( the payment is extraordinary effort). I don't see this as an edge case. I see it as clear-cut entrapment. Had the police stayed home that day, no crime would have happened.
The recruitment process now has pamphlets of the benefits. Lines them up and sums them up, makes it sound like a $200k bonus for signing. At least when I last saw, around the time of the first Gulf War.
If you throw all the FBI agents in jail, and throw out all the convictions, were those children still rescued? Yes? Then the "for the children" doesn't matter. The government should not be allowed to actively participate in a crime. Even if "only" to catch others.
If this was a non-criminal investigation "for the children" then free the abused children. But don't use the tainted evidence in criminal proceedings.
You can have one without the other.
Nope. If he doesn't think it's child porn, then he didn't commit a crime.
Entrapment would be paying someone to go to the link, when they know it's child porn. "It's a special promotion. I know you don't like Child Porn, that's why they are paying you. $10 to make an account. You don't even have to enjoy the child porn." That's getting someone not interested to commit the crime. That's entrapment.
The example isn't clear. He was asked and paid. Rarely is someone given a pamphlet with a contract. The cop walked up to Grayson. The cop asked Grayson to deliver a package (not a crime). The cop then offered to pay Grayson to deliver it (not a crime). Grayson delivered a package, and was "turned into" a drug mule unwittingly by the cop. Clear entrapment. The comic is clearly wrong. Why are you so emotionally invested in that web comic? How does it harm you personally if it has some errors?
The dust wouldn't have been as well cleared, and the same bodies that cleared them, would have pushed bits in the dense areas into collisions, resulting in more dust. And no, there's nothign in TFA about the "why", they haven't even gotten back all the "what" yet. I expect that one of the results will include a revised estimate to the age.
Can you explain what this has to do with Jupiter, its' rings, or the Cassini spacecraft?
Penal colonies. Duh.
Private enterprise is cheaper than big government. Government is bad, so private is better. Why should the budget be wasted on the government doing things at cost, when it can be used to extract funds from people and pay them to billionaires making huge profits?
Most people require more structure. What site should you start with? What's a good end goal?
Yes, you can learn everything "college" (or coding school) will teach you from buying last year's texts at 10% of the price, and reading them yourself. But if that's as effective, why aren't more people doing it?
Veterans benefits was a throwback to a time when service wasn't voluntary. Then, because VA is not "military spending", the veterans had all the benefits separated, inflated, and are now a political, not practical, issue. VA loans, near guaranteed employment (many places have overt veteran preference, and it's illegal for the US government to hire a person to a job if there's a less qualified veteran that meets the minimums). The benefits are a lure to get people in. Because the pay is low (compared to salary in the private sector), mainly because the military doesn't include the benefits (uniforms provided, housing provided, vehicles, transportation, recreation, and other things provided). So $20k in the military would be like 40-60k in the private sector. But, since that's not well advertised, the recruiters focus on your "exit bonus" of the GI Bill, and other benefits. If the VA benefits weren't there, the recruits would reduce.
There are abuses on both sides. Those that get good benefits they didn't "need", and those who need a benefit that is provided in some form, but not in the form they need (education for this guy, housing for the homeless vets).
Yeah, they want unreasonable things like treatment for medical conditions caused by their service, or the government to live up to the promises made when they signed up. People sign up under the promise of the GI Bill and other benefits, only to see them harder to get than promised.
Which? You give no cites, and I didn't see any in https://www.google.com/search?... a casual Google search. Give cites. I think you are lying.
So the Conservatives, in order to show they hold the "high ground" are making sure to turn themselves into hypocrites, doing that which they complain of in others?
Logic like that is why I'd be a "conservative" anywhere else in the world, but not in the US.
So you like abuse of power, so long as you don't like those it's used against. That makes you evil.
"Putin's bitch" could have generated just as much fake outrage, and be absent fake claims of homophobia. The point is, insult the president, go to jail. We live in the Fascist Sates of America, comrade.
No. the blowjob isn't the insult, but serving putin for his sexual pleasure in a subservient manner is.
Not just gay men receive blowjobs. Not just gay men give them. And, regardless of your gender or orientation, it's considered more submissive to give than receive.
The only people who thought this homophobic aren't gay. Trump is a servant to Putin.
What Libs? All I see are a bunch of triggered cuckservatives.
Citizens who [don't agree with me] are similarly evil.
Close enough.
So everyone who doesn't think like you is evil.
That's evil.
First, get in touch with reality. Second, use logic and observation. You've demonstrated neither.
You could lie and say that you don't know it, but courts get kind of annoyed with perjury.
Worked for plenty of presidents.
So, to get a conviction: The police demand a passcode. Type it in wrong until the phone breaks. Then hold the person in prison for contempt. No need for actual evidence,
If you don't like it, prove your innocence.
Compelled speech is not prohibited. Compelled incriminating speech is. Unless your password is "IMolestSmallChildren123", then your password isn't incriminating, even if the things unlocked by the password are.