Slashdot Mirror


Should The Government Pay For Veterans To Attend Code Schools? (backchannel.com)

mirandakatz writes: David Molina was finishing up his 12-year time in the army when he started teaching himself to code, and started to think that he might like to pursue it professionally once his service was done. But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedicate the four years he'd need to get an undergraduate degree in computer science -- and the GI Bill, he learned, won't cover accelerated programs like code schools. So he started an organization dedicated to changing that. Operation Code is lobbying politicians to allow vets to attend code schools through the GI Bill and prepare themselves for the sorts of stable, middle-class jobs that have come to be called "blue-collar coding." Molina sees it as a serious failing that the GI Bill will cover myriad vocational programs, but not those that can prepare veterans for one of the fastest-growing industries in existence.
The issue seems to be quality. The group estimates there are already nine code schools in the U.S. which do accept GI Bill benefits -- but only "longer-standing ones that have made it through State Approving Agencies." Meanwhile, Course Report calculates 18,000 people finished coding bootcamps last year -- and that two thirds of them found a job within three months.

But I just liked how Molina described his introduction into the world of programmers. While stationed at Dover Air Force Base, he attended Baltimore's long-standing Meetup for Ruby on Rails, where "People taught me about open source. There was pizza, there was beer. They made me feel like I was at home."

168 comments

  1. Should government pay for diploma mills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No. New schools, even if they're "coding schools" still need to go through the normal procedures to attain recognition that they are a real school.

    1. Re:Should government pay for diploma mills? by slashkitty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, instead of "Coding Boot Camps", I'd call most of the "Code Mills". Maybe all they are good for is seeing if you have an affinity for programming.. not actually giving you all the skills you need to succeed.

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    2. Re:Should government pay for diploma mills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, "real schools" that launder old money into credentials.

    3. Re:Should government pay for diploma mills? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The school should get fully paid only after the student completes the course, gets a job, and is employed for six months. That will increase their incentive to work with local employers, teach skills that are actually in demand, and help with job placement. It will decrease their incentive to enroll people that clearly can't do the work.

    4. Re: Should government pay for diploma mills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't resist. This guy is constantly posting about old money, Harvard, and laundry. I swear he has a wash and gold company and big dry cleaners are after him. Or another nutter.

      If he had actually gone to a real school - a abet certified course, he could tell the diffference.

      This distaste and distain for learning has got to stop. It is one of the most destructive mentalities. Book burning, anti science, anti learning.

      How about stop using that internet. It was all engineering from high degree holders.

    5. Re:Should government pay for diploma mills? by Slugster · · Score: 1

      Yea but,,, see,,, if they went into debt for a 'real' school, they would have asked for a lot more pay. And probably would have been a lot less likely to get hired.

      How about government stop paying for all schools for a while? And let the schools educational standards and tuition pricing stand on their own merits?

    6. Re: Should government pay for diploma mills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they let studen loans have bankruptcy

    7. Re:Should government pay for diploma mills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For that matter, the schools should have their tuition earnings be contingent on the increase in salary their graduates make over minimum wage. Take an average multiple of the minimum wage that each student is earning for the three years following graduation: if that number is 2 then the school should be able to keep 100% of federal financial aid paid as tuition. If that number is less than 2, they should have to divide the number by two and that should be the percent of federal financial aid paid as tuition they get to keep. If that number is greater than 2, they should get a bonus from the federal government.

    8. Re:Should government pay for diploma mills? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      The school should get fully paid only after the student completes the course, gets a job, and is employed for six months... It will decrease their incentive to enroll people that clearly can't do the work.

      Some of the programs do exactly that. Then they basically end up enrolling people who could already program. They force you to go through a few dozen "exercises" which are basically programming interview questions, plus several small projects. So by the time you're enrolled, you don't really need the course anymore.

    9. Re:Should government pay for diploma mills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they should not, but if the institution is legit then yes they should. Combat veterans are owed a great debt and we should honor that debt.

    10. Re: Should government pay for diploma mills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're employed by higher education, aren't you? I am, I used to defend it. I work for a really well known medical institute on the eastern seaboard...and trust me...it sucks. Students are fleeced for all they can.

      I'm not saying education is bad, but this "oh you went to so and so, you're one of us" bullshit has to stop

  2. Watch out for scams! by mspohr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, there are a lot of schools scamming veterans. They offer fairly useless courses and the government pays.
    Of course it would be good for veterans to learn coding but it should be a properly accredited school. It looks like there is a mechanism in place to properly vet (sic) schools and it should be followed.
    Pizza and beer do not necessarily make a good school.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Watch out for scams! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, there are a lot of schools scamming veterans.

      What kind of sleazy asshole would scam a veteran and think he could get away with it?

      http://pacedm.com/2016/05/trum...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Watch out for scams! by El+Cubano · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, there are a lot of schools scamming veterans. They offer fairly useless courses and the government pays.

      At the same time, the rules on what the GI Bill can be used for are really strange in some instances. For example, you can use it toward flight school to get a commercial pilot's license. You can use it for vocational school to get electrical, plumbing, etc., qualified. But you can't use it to get a Ph.D. You also can't use it to get a second degree at the same level as one you already have. Did you get a BA in general studies and now you want an engineering degree? You're on your own. Did you earn a non-technical Master's in a military leadership school and now you want to get a technical Master's in your primary field? Too bad.

      The point is that code schools, assuming that they are reputable, should be considered the same as getting certified to fly, or for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, etc. The reputability problem exists for all of those other fields as well, so it seems disingenuous to say that the GI Bill is OK to use for those other fields, but not for code schools.

    3. Re:Watch out for scams! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does it cover foreign languages? If he wants to go into tech he should learn Hindi.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem with the GI Bill is that it exists at all.

      If we're going to make education free, we should make it free for ALL citizens. There should not be a special program for people who joined the military.

      Either free college for everybody, or free college for nobody. Veterans are NOT special. (Ok, they're short-bus "special" most of the time, but that's not the same.)

      If we're not paying for PhDs for the the general population, we do not need to be paying for them for ex-military. If we're not paying for plumbing school for the kid who was smart enough not to join the army, we do not need to be paying for it for the kid who was stupid enough to join.

      And under no circumstances should it be legal for government education money to go to a for-profit school of any kind. (It also should be illegal for a religiously affiliated school to ever see any tax money, but that's a separate issue.)

    5. Re: Watch out for scams! by Malenx · · Score: 1

      If your going to be a dick, at least be one under your real account.

    6. Re:Watch out for scams! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of schools scamming everyone. The FTC and various state governments spend an inordinate amount of time investigating what amounts to a student loan fraud racket.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Watch out for scams! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      It's a silly question. The question should be: should the government pay for veterans to attend schools, period. If yes, then by all means also include code schools if they meet whatever criteria and standards are set.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True but, electrical, plumbing, etc. jobs have a low wash-out rate unlike programming. The owner of my company is a Vietnam and first Gulf War vet, and we've hired a lot of vets. I think around four dozen total and about twenty of them programmers. Not a one made it six months. Most couldn't do the job so they were gone before the end of their 90 probationary privilege, and as far as I can remember, all of the others quit before six months mostly due to the long hours. When the easiest job I've had in the past two decades required a minimum of 60 hours of work and at most jobs, nearly everyone worked more hours than that. Sometimes a lot more. The former military guys are usually older and have families, so they just can't deal with the long hours and lack of vacation time. The military gives 30 days off each year for all members from privates to generals (which is just amazing in its fairness), so going from that to a job where you can't take time off is pretty jarring.

    9. Re: Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus comp time for working weekends or as a reward. I think I got 43 days off in my last year in the Army. I don't think I've had that many days off total in the almost 14 years since I graduated with a comp sci degree.

    10. Re:Watch out for scams! by dasgoober · · Score: 2

      Seems to me, that's a resource allocation and management problem, that you hafta work 60+ hours per week, not that the vets can't handle it.
      On top of that, if they're being paid salary, they're making 30% less per hour than they signed up for.

    11. Re:Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Most Indians in tech speak English perfectly fine. A fair few maybe even speak English better than they speak Hindi, seeing as how Hindi is just one of dozens of languages spoken in India.

      Most of my Indian colleagues are native speakers of Kannada, Gujarati, or Telugu; not Hindi.

    12. Re:Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of sleazy asshole would scam a veteran and think he could get away with it?

      A scammer. That kind of sleazy asshole. Scamming a veteran is no more or less sleazy than scamming a non-veteran; it's damn sleazy either way, but scammers exist, therefore somewhere someone is trying to scam veterans.

    13. Re: Watch out for scams! by Hasaf · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is about being a dick. It is about being fair to all Americans. The first thing you need to remember is that less than a quarter of the age eligible, Americans are even eligible to serve.

      It isn't just a single factor, like weight, there are many, underlying conditions that make more than the majority ineligible. We need a plan the works for everyone. We will never reach that goal in practice; but we need to keep reaching for it. The current system caters to the elite and consigns the rest to the rubbish heap.

      We like to think that there is an economic benefit that comes from the current structure. The is. However, there are also significant costs that get ignored until they are unbearable for society, then we try to hide them in the plantations . . . .err, prisons.

    14. Re: Watch out for scams! by Malenx · · Score: 2

      If your company is I.T. and has that high of required hours, either your making insane paychecks or your being scammed and the military guys are leaving because they see the bs.

      Nobody with good skills should put up with those hours unless they decided the compensation is well worth it.

    15. Re:Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that it's generally not a good idea to elect a scammer to the presidency.

      Which is exactly what happened. Donald J. Trump is a scammer. He's never actually worked a day in his life. Every penny he has, he's scammed from somebody. He's still doing it, he's using the presidency to fleece the American people.

      He scammed people before he was in the White House, he's scamming people now, and unless he is sent to prison, he will continue scamming once he's out.

    16. Re: Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing benefits only enjoyed by the lucky few such as the average european...

    17. Re:Watch out for scams! by Imrik · · Score: 1

      By learning Indian languages they'll be better able to fake an Indian accent, allowing them to get a job in the states.

    18. Re: Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lack of time off in the USA seems bizarre to those of us in Europe where something around 35 days is standard, including national celebrations, Christmas, etc. Since the EU enshrines the right to paid time off then that might be lost in the UK in time, although most companies offered around 30 days before it became a legal requirement in 1999.

    19. Re:Watch out for scams! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Most Indians in tech speak English perfectly fine.

      If you think they do, then you don't.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Watch out for scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another trump joke in another post!!!!! you are on a roll today!!!! seriously, get a life. he doesn't spend this much time thinking about you (neither did obama).

  3. "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedicate" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a taxpayer, how is that my fault? I'm not paying for him to fix his life choices.

  4. combat veterans should get a free ride for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to do whatever they want, whenever they want.

    REMFs should have to get a real job like everyone else.

    1. Re:combat veterans should get a free ride for life by hackel · · Score: 1

      Well said. Of course the U.S. American idiots will be down-voting you to hell on here. Deplorable.

    2. Re:combat veterans should get a free ride for life by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It would appear that you're real fuzzy on "war crime" and "complicit".

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. America is broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GI bill covers plenty of stuff. We can't afford to keep expanding every program each time people want more bennies

  6. Betteridge's law of headlines by stephenmac7 · · Score: 1

    No.

    --
    "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." -- Judge Gideon J. Tucker
    1. Re:Betteridge's law of headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an uninsightful and often-wrong law.

      Most headlines that end with a question mark are asking a yes-or-no question that is a clear matter of opinion. So they could be answered "yes," or "no." Betteridge's law is just stating half of the obvious.

      In other cases the question is of a different semantic character, like "What lies between the rings of Saturn?" Even if the answer is "nothing," shortening that to "no" would still be semantically incorrect. So, in those cases, the Betteridge's law is simply wrong.

  7. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like 'Merica you can just GET OUT.

  8. It's all a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does going to a "coding school" actually let you work as a qualified professional? Very, very unlikely. They might as well be offering 6-week brain surgery school.

    1. Re:It's all a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might as well be offering 6-week brain surgery school.

      My brain surgeon when to six-week brain surgery school and there's absolutely nothing wrong with my brain B R 4 i N bahrain baZOOka bah bah black sheep...

    2. Re: It's all a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. Start posting anti American anti troop trash then like the rest of the ungrateful brain damaged retards.

      Or better yet, go to a combat zone and say its like a regular job.

    3. Re: It's all a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cirr.org

  9. New Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should veterans be shoehorned into "tech" alongside unqualified minorities, self-styled feminists, BA grads posing as developers and every other special group that can't actually code?

    NO.

    1. Re:New Question by mikael · · Score: 1

      There are a good number of defence technology companies who will consider veterans.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re: New Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you didn't read. While he was serving he taught himself. He attended coding meet ups around Baltimore to learn. This isn't some female coder camp agenda. This is a military vet who WANTS to code for a living. Notice the word wants.

    3. Re:New Question by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      There are a good number of defence technology companies who will consider veterans.

      When I left the military, my first coding job was with a defense company. They hired vets for several reasons:

      1. I already had a security clearance.
      2. I knew military lingo and acronyms.
      3. When interacting with our military clients, I knew that colonels and generals don't like to be addressed as "dude".

    4. Re:New Question by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Don't undersell item no. 3. I've never served myself but I've worked with plenty of folks who have. They ran the gamut in terms of their technical skills from none to PhD physicist, but compared to kids fresh out of college, not a single one of them ever needed to be taught how to work and behave in the workplace. Anyone who's ever had a fresh crop of overconfident graduates come in the door knows exactly what I mean.

  10. Yes, but... by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 2

    I've had coworkers that were veterans and they got their masters degrees while in the military. There are apparently some really good C.S. programs like UMD that bend over backwards to accommodate their schedule and ensure credits transfer.

  11. ITT Tech took GI money as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all saw how well that worked out.

  12. Better than a border wall or nukes by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Better means to spend tax money than waste it on a border wall or more nukes!

    1. Re:Better than a border wall or nukes by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Better means to spend tax money than waste it on a border wall or more nukes!

      Spending programs can not be justified just by pointing out other spending that is even stupider.

  13. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the battle with people who think plurals are formed with an apostrophe?

    vet's? god's? Seriously? Do you have a brain tumor or gunshot to the head?

  14. Sure, except... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    First we need a "coding school" that is worth a damn. For the rest of this post I am going to say programming and not coding. I hate that word. I should also say some of the best programmers I've met never went to college. If such a program is to be instituted, It's going to have to be designed by the likes of Google, Canonical, and even Microsoft. This would also have to involve companies around the nation bringing in veterans for internships while they go over self-paced curriculum. Our veterans deserve a whole hell of a lot more than that though. The need to have the opportunity to be taught entrepreneurial skills and more. Now let's not forget about fixing the VA.

    I get it, our country is broke. But if we could bring industry directly on board, that could mitigate a lot of government spending for these things. Next we need to pass a law that requires congressmen to actually read the bills they pass. I am tired of hearing about congressmen voting for something and then having remorse because they never actually read the proposal. Maybe then we could cut some government spending and fix the VA.

    Our men and women in the armed forces deserve a lot, especially more respect. So yeah, start by recruiting major industry and well go from there.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  15. Better teach them blacksmithing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the majority of coding is outsourced to India and China, they might as well teach them how to shoe a horse. At least that cannot be done remotely.

  16. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody said it was YOUR fault. This man served 12 years. He deserves a lot more than what he gets, but that's another convo for later.

  17. I dont get it by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do Americans apparently feel such a massive debt of gratitude is appropriate for ALL military vets?
    Apart from anything else, they chose the job.
    Where's the recognition for the police or firefighters or others who clearly face far more danger in 1 day than the average so-called vet who spent their entire enlistment (which could be as small as 2 years) in some stateside base nowhere near any actual danger?

    1. Re:I dont get it by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Where's the recognition for the police or firefighters or others who clearly face far more danger

      Neither policing nor firefighting is particularly dangerous. Farmers, truck drivers, and retail clerks are all more likely to die or be injured on the job.

      The most common reason that police die on the job is traffic accidents. The second most common reason is suicide.

      Over a 30 year career, this is the number of times that most police officers fire their weapon in action: 0.

      Being a cop in real life is not like it is on TV.

    2. Re: I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many kids signed up after 9/11. Because they love thier country and wanted to do something.

      Yes, people still feel like that. There are really people that want to serve. There are people that volunteer as firemen and join the police too.

      Civic duty still exists. Maybe not for the radical left. But most people feel it. There is still pride.

      Disputed what you have been taught, its ok to be proud of what country you live in. Its ok to feel outrage when dictators mass murder thier citizens. Or starve them. Or has them. WW2.

      Its ok and humane to want to do something to stop it. So people join the military. To defend and fight and attack.

      All countries have militaries. Do you know why? The world is a violent place. No,child, not because of the USA.

        Even look at what Russia is doing or China. War is always going on 24/7. Always. It always will. Someone will always try to take power or control. Someone will always kill the weaker.

      Objectively look around. Every continent has multiple wars going on right now.

      That is why people join.

      And its not the same as an air conditioned desk job in Silicon Valley. This 'do nothing' global it's strategy has just delayed the big battles coming.

      North Korea could have been handled before they got nukes. But the world waited. No one cares about the deaths of entire families in NK because they can't see it. And if you don't want to stop it, there is something seriously wrong with your humanity.

    3. Re: I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evil is when good men do nothing.

    4. Re: I dont get it by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      So you just went on a whole rant about why people join the military which has exactly didlly-squat to do with anything, least of all my point you were responding to, then made several ridiculous and badly spelled (and BTW very incorrect) assumptions about me just because your world view is clearly so tiny it only allows for 2 types of people. Well done dude. please give your single brain cell a rest now.

    5. Re:I dont get it by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      > Over a 30 year career, this is the number of times that most police officers fire their weapon in action: 0.

      I bet thats also true of nearly all navy/airforce and maybe even most army vets.

    6. Re: I dont get it by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      A stitch in time saves nine

    7. Re:I dont get it by chihowa · · Score: 1

      People love firefighters. You can see the appreciation ooze from everybody if you're ever at the grocery store when they show up to restock the station. There's no lack of gratitude for them. Most states in the US have special license plates for firefighters because it's something that people appreciate (even if getting one is a bit tacky).

      Cops are jerks often enough that nobody likes them. People often look ill at ease when they are around, even if they're doing nothing wrong. The only time you hear somebody not in uniform say that they are a police officer is if they are a relative of yours or if they are currently breaking the law and expecting to get let off the hook for it out of professional courtesy.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    8. Re: I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Veteran here. They can all call in sick. They can take vacation whenever they want. They have all their rights intact. They enjoy freedom. In the United States military you are a cog in a wheel and you will like it. Standby to standby.

    9. Re: I dont get it by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      All countries have militaries.

      Not true. There's Samoa or Vanuatu, something like that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re: I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think one of the primary differences is that a police officer or firefighter can quit their job at any time. A soldier who refuses to reply, or any other lawful order, does not have the option to quit. The soldier can be jailed for this, then given a less than honorable discharge that disqualifies them for government benefits and jobs later in life.

    11. Re:I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well to some extent the VA benefits are from a grateful populace who is glad that the veteran enlisted so that they or their kid wouldn't be drafted. VA benefits are part of the package to induce enlistment into a job in which you don't have much say in what you do and don't have the option to quit (without serious consequences) when you don't like it. If police and firefighters wake up some day and say, "I'm done, I quit", they won't be prosecuted.

    12. Re: I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even look at what Russia is doing or China. War is always going on 24/7. Always. It always will. Someone will always try to take power or control. Someone will always kill the weaker.

      Objectively look around. Every continent has multiple wars going on right now.

      That is why people join."

      Hey, that's fine. I'm all for a defensive military. But it's not the USA's place to police the world. It never was and we were warned against it time after time.

      9/11 was that generation's pearl harbor. It turned an anti-war nation into a pro-war people and new recruits signed up by the masses. They were told that they were attacked because of their religion, or their lifestyle, or their sins and that the enemy was some boogeyman hiding in a cave in the desert. They were told that this enemy couldn't be reasoned with, that it would never stop, and that it had already struck once, statistically killing a very small amount of people. However, this nation had not been so blatantly attacked on its own soil in memorable history and it was in shock. It's precious pride had been injured. Its first reaction? It wanted revenge. Not very fitting for a nation that constantly boasts of its Christian roots and ideals.

      Call it what you want but our military is a mercenary force these days, marching off to protect the interests of the highest bidder. What freedoms are being protected by attacking Syria? Why are we still in Afghanistan? Is Iraq better off without Saddam? It's just one mess after another with these clowns. It's time for some semblance of intelligence. Pull our military back to our shores where they belong and start fortifying our borders before we're too weak to defend ourselves from some other opportunistic nation that isn't in horrible debt.

    13. Re:I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because unlike Police and Firefighters, soldiers get paid crap salaries and don't have a union to provide protections. Out agreement with them is that we can call on them on a moment's notice to sacrifice their lives in a foreign shithole, and in exchange we'll give them schooling and healthcare when they get back. We're doing a crappy job on the healthcare front, so don't take away the schooling.

    14. Re:I dont get it by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> soldiers get paid crap salaries and don't have a union to provide protections

      Nobody forced them to join up.

      >> in exchange we'll give them schooling and healthcare when they get back.

      Show me where thats oficially stated and I'll believe you.

  18. Coding Schools Article by twistedcubic · · Score: 2

    Want a Job in Silicon Valley? Keep Away From Coding Schools: https://www.bloomberg.com/news... This isn't the whole story, of course, because there are good schools, and not all jobs are in Silicon Valley. But once the government starts providing tuition for these places, lots of these "coding schools" with low quality and high tuition will pop up everywhere.

    1. Re:Coding Schools Article by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      When George W. signed a $3,000 tax credit for people to train for new careers after 9/11, I never heard of programming boot camps to learn computer programming quickly. I went back to community college because I already had an A.A. in General Education, so I only needed to take to two major classes per semester over a five year period while working full-time as a video game tester. I wanted to go into white box testing but went with IT Support after I graduated.

  19. Re:ugh by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is zero reason to give them anything but their last paycheck on the way out the door.

    As a veteran, I pretty much agree with this. The military is 100% volunteer, and the pay is pretty good. Of course we need to take care of people that were wounded or disabled in the line of duty, but for everyone else, the handouts and entitlements are excessive. The benefits are also heavily skewed toward those that need them the least. I used a VA loan to buy a house in San Jose, one of the most expensive housing markets in the world, and over the life of the loan I will get about $200k in taxpayer funded subsidies, which I am happy to accept but certainly don't "need". Yet many veterans living in trailer parks don't have the ability or knowledge to benefit from the same program.

    In many ways, veterans are just another special interest group, with a huge voting block to back them up. It is difficult for politicians to resist their demands because they don't want attack ads claiming they "don't care about vets".

  20. It could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it were regulated closely, and the government payouts were conditional on the students having relevant employment 1-2 years after graduation.

    Hey, it's better than supporting these guys on welfare. However, financial support for vets obtaining a real college degree (with reading/writing/math/history, along with optional coding) would be much better.

  21. Ugh, NO! by hackel · · Score: 1

    Not until *every* U.S. resident has access to such free education. We give these idiots enough already. We need to provide free educational services to everyone, regardless of what their past employment was.

    1. Re: Ugh, NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Fuck the police and fireman too. There job is exactly as risky as my desk job programming! Ohh wait. Its not. I don't face danger daily or getting shot in the face or my head cut off. Well maybe they should be taken care of...

    2. Re: Ugh, NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most military won't see action, get shot at, get their heads cut off, face danger, etc in their careers either.

      Why should they be taken care of? Because they chose a job? Because their drill sergeant yelled at them and made them run? No...they don't deserve any more than they get.

  22. hell no by TRRosen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you can't learn to code on your own you can't learn to code. This is not an industry where you can learn some skill and be done. Coders are constantly retraining themselves to handle new technologies. Maybe this little snowflake should grow up and realize millions of people actually work there way through college studying late at night after working an 8 hour shift and then taking care of there kids.

    1. Re:hell no by notil · · Score: 1

      Are you a veteran? If you are, I'm sure you're aware that there are unbelievable hurdles to re-integrating with civilian society, many of which can be helped with elevated community support and a steady job. True, there are many people in this country that work very hard, and you need to constantly retrain yourself and be creative to code, but vets that are reintegrating are playing by many different rules (because of serving our country!) that civilians are not: I can't see how any initiative providing specific help to this group to find jobs and meaning in the 21st century would be a waste.

    2. Re:hell no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Military members already get plenty of special privileges throughout society from discounts, retirement, free college, preference in government and private hiring procedures regardless of merit, and near worship from large swaths of the population.

      They are playing with easier rules than say, someone that works a more dangerous job as a forester and had to work their way through school with no healthcare, moving expenses, living allotment, or retirement fund.

      Veterans already are getting more breaks than they deserve and all they want are more. Go ahead and ask any realistic veteran, they will tell you the military are the real welfare queens living off the taxes of working people so they can play hero in a sand-swept hellhole killing civilians half the time. Not to be crude, but that is what you get with firsthand experience and everyone pretending it didn't happen.

    3. Re:hell no by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      A lot of the enlisted are enlisted because they couldn't go to college. Some are high school dropouts. Of course they're going to have trouble getting a regular job and living a regular life. They'd have the same problem whether they enlisted or not!

    4. Re:hell no by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      A lot of the enlisted are enlisted because they couldn't go to college. Some are high school dropouts. Of course they're going to have trouble getting a regular job and living a regular life. They'd have the same problem whether they enlisted or not!

      Citations with numbers to back your assertion please.

    5. Re:hell no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm an enlisted military member.

      I'm a high school drop out, while I did get accepted to a college, I couldn't afford to go. I also struggled with finding employment in the civilian sector. At least 4 of my current coworkers come from a similar background. My circumstance is based partially on poor decisions as a teenager as well as a difficult family life and the lack of support a solid family structure would provide.

      We have about 100 people where I work, so 5 out of 100, possibly higher because I don't know everyone's life story.

    6. Re:hell no by djinn6 · · Score: 1
      I was tempted to say fuck off and do your own research, but since you said "please", I looked into this a bit more.

      The military does require a High School diploma or GED to enlist now, so I was wrong about there being high school dropouts (only having a GED does technically make one a dropout but it sort of makes up for it). However, I couldn't find any number on whether they scored well on SAT or ACT tests, or whether they are college-bound.

      There are some demographics here.

      Relatively few enlisted men and women are college graduates (4.1%) or have an advanced degree (0.5%). More than nine-in-ten (94.0%) are high school graduates and some of them have attended some college.

      Obviously some of this is due to how young they are, having not had the chance to go yet.

      There's also some information about post-discharge education attainment here.

      Overall, the percentage of Veterans with a Bachelor’s degree was lower than that of non-Veterans throughout the decade.

      The difference is not that big, but keep in mind that college is free for veterans and all they need to do is put in the time. One might imagine what it would be like if they were on equal footings with everyone else.

  23. Re:ugh by hackel · · Score: 1

    Disappointed to see this comment down-voted. This was exactly my reaction upon reading the comment as well, even though I agree with it. Bloody ACs and their poor education! If only there was some kind of free education we could give them...

  24. eight more years in and... by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    he could have gotten a nice fat retirement check the rest of his life

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:eight more years in and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People's reasons for exiting the military are their own. This is unrelated to the article.

    2. Re:eight more years in and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he could have gotten a nice fat retirement check the rest of his life

      People's reasons for exiting the military are their own. This is unrelated to the article.

      I got out after my first enlistment ended at 6 years. I can't tell you how many people were saying things like, "You could stay in for twenty and get your retirement. You're already an E5, why would you get out now?"

      I told all of them the same thing. "You want me to waste 14 years of my life doing things I don't want to and have already done, getting nowehere in life, just for that?"

      There is so much pressure on those who are about to get out to re-enlist. They try to scare you that the world is so difficult. At the time, I just assumed those that stayed in were weak and afraid of trying to make something of themselves.

      I still feel that way when I hear someone stayed in for 20 years or more. They were almost like a welfare recipient, hooked on the steady government money.

  25. Title misleading by g01d4 · · Score: 1

    As stated in the summary the gov't does pay for these schools and "the issue is quality". Or is it? Is our protagonist asserting these schools are unfairly being evaluated as colleges when they're essentially vocational schools focused on what's apparently become a blue collar vocation?

  26. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This man had a job for 12 years. He already got paid more than he deserves for it, we shouldn't pay for his school too.

    And it was his poor life choice to get married and have kids before getting an education. I'm all about some kind of social safety net for idiots like that, but let's not pretend that he deserves to get anything other than what any citizen would get.

  27. Re:ugh by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    The idea of giving veterans a leg up is hardly new, and in and of itself I can't imagine why it would be controversial. Now whether it should just be making more educational opportunities available, or trying to target specific occupations is a matter of debate.

    As I sidenote, many years ago, at the dawn of my professional IT career, I installed and maintained POS software that had been developed by a fellow who got his start in programming via GI benefits after his tour of duty in Vietnam. He did pretty darned well for himself, and the last I had heard he'd sold his company for a pretty tidy sum. Now that is admittedly anecdotal, but it does suggest there are good sound benefits to help vets find career opportunities.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  28. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedic by hackel · · Score: 3, Informative

    He was paid wages for hose 12 years. He got *exactly* what he deserves.

  29. Re:ugh by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, they want unreasonable things like treatment for medical conditions caused by their service, or the government to live up to the promises made when they signed up. People sign up under the promise of the GI Bill and other benefits, only to see them harder to get than promised.

  30. If the G.I. Bill covers it? Sure... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: That's what a G.I. bill's all about - letting soldiers who are smart enough to take advantage of it better their life!

    * I admire the guys that DO take advantage of it in fact...

    APK

    P.S.=> I have NO problem w/ that - it's the RIGHT thing to do (they were told their jobs would be here after the wars - heh, they shipped jobs off to nations the USA's fought before instead - making many soldiers cops (a good thing imo) instead of giving them back jobs they had pre-war))... apk

  31. Re:ugh by lowflying · · Score: 1

    No, it's still worth saying.

    Fuck the veterans. Did they or did they not get paid? Because I'm pretty sure being stupid enough to get a job in the army is still getting a job. There is zero reason to give them anything but their last paycheck on the way out the door.

    Part of the benefits package that they have contracted too be paid is additional education during and after service. A major point of the article is that it might have broader societal advantages if that educational benefit could be used on coder schools.

  32. Re:ugh by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Veterans benefits was a throwback to a time when service wasn't voluntary. Then, because VA is not "military spending", the veterans had all the benefits separated, inflated, and are now a political, not practical, issue. VA loans, near guaranteed employment (many places have overt veteran preference, and it's illegal for the US government to hire a person to a job if there's a less qualified veteran that meets the minimums). The benefits are a lure to get people in. Because the pay is low (compared to salary in the private sector), mainly because the military doesn't include the benefits (uniforms provided, housing provided, vehicles, transportation, recreation, and other things provided). So $20k in the military would be like 40-60k in the private sector. But, since that's not well advertised, the recruiters focus on your "exit bonus" of the GI Bill, and other benefits. If the VA benefits weren't there, the recruits would reduce.

    There are abuses on both sides. Those that get good benefits they didn't "need", and those who need a benefit that is provided in some form, but not in the form they need (education for this guy, housing for the homeless vets).

  33. Re:Code Schools normally suck.. Gov Shouldnt fund by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Most people require more structure. What site should you start with? What's a good end goal?

    Yes, you can learn everything "college" (or coding school) will teach you from buying last year's texts at 10% of the price, and reading them yourself. But if that's as effective, why aren't more people doing it?

  34. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Like all the Conservitards who, for the last eight years, said life with Obama as president was living hell for them? The way they left?
    So no. We're staying. We have our own vision of what makes American great. And we're going to work on rebuilding that America after we kick Twitler out.
    Twitler bragged that the election was rigged. And the Replicans all the sudden don't seem so interested in investigating Russian interference. Go figure. Because if they did, and they found out the outcome was affected, that would paint this administration in an even worse light than it already is.
    When the elections aren't rigged, and the majority has its say again, we'll have to rebuild everything that Twitler and the Republicans are currently in the process of tearing down.
    So again, We're not getting out. This is our America too. We're staying. Get over it. Then you'll have had plenty of practice at "getting over it." And you'll have another chance to leave if you don't like it.

  35. I think they should provide apptitute tests. by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    In particular for code but I think it would also benefit all ares of study I think no matter what you use the GI bill for you should be required to pass aptitude requirements to be sure you are actually suited to learning that skill and advised properly. But they can't just be paper tests but rather tests in addition to counselors that can provide exceptions to the tests. The counselors are then reviewed later to see if their exceptions were justified.

    Not everyone is suited for coding. It's a special aptitude for something quite boring.
    I'd say less than 3 percent of the population.
    Maybe 20% for something like network engineering.
    A sysadmin falls between the two and requires somewhat better social skills.

    1. Re:I think they should provide apptitute tests. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Social sysadmin is devops and it's a deliberate move to force traditional antisocial sysadmins out of jobs permanently. Sysadmin roles already don't exist professionally and are strictly unpaid hobbies now. The stereotype of the solitary coder is also outdated as all coders must be team players. Your proposed aptitude test would need to test for social skills and fail anyone who would have been suited for technical work a decade ago.

    2. Re:I think they should provide apptitute tests. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. Sysadmins don't need social skills, we just need to know how to torment you developers :-P

  36. Re:ugh by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The benefits are a lure to get people in.

    I wonder how effective that is. I enlisted in the Marines on my 18th birthday, and I had never heard of any benefits (and in general, had no idea what I was signing up for). Maybe the more brain-oriented branches (AF, Navy) are different, but I never heard any Marine say he enlisted to pay for college, or to get a home loan.

  37. Avoid the bottom feeders, so, NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, only nationally, recognized, accredited schools that impart real, nationally, recognized, degrees. You know - a BS, BA, one of those. Avoid any AA stuff.

    Veterans are getting screwed at places with 'online' degrees that aren't worth anything.

    They have less than 10% completion rates and leave our veterans with nothing but debt.

    Hint - if they advertise on TV and it isn't during the game their team is playing in, run away.

    Go to a community college or other state institution of higher learning to not get screwed. Or travel to India and use their 4th tier colleges to get a degree. At least there you won't have debt or unexpected expectations. This isn't to say that their tier-1 schools aren't excellent, but every country has multiple layers + bottom feeders. Even at a bad school in India, you'd gain the international experiences which will be worth as much as any degree after living there 4 yrs.

    Coding boot camps don't work for average people. I've had 5 day intensive training a few times. Some of the experts in my team got a bunch out of those, but I, being average, didn't. It was all I could do just to copy/paste the exercises to keep up. Given, it was a class on a cross-platform development tool and I was still learning Unix at the time, to perhaps it wasn't fair.
    Also have done immersion language training. Spent 3 weeks learning Spanish overseas. Each week is almost like a full semester class in college. My brain hurt after the 4 hours of class time. Our brains need time to organize things with some rest between. For me, there wasn't sufficient brain rest.

    No to the boot camps. Everyone WANTS to become an expert in 5 days, but that really isn't the way these things work. In 5 days, you are just a little above noob-level, with a $2K-5K price tag? Take the class at the community college for $200. Much better use of your time.

    Avoid the bottom feeders.

  38. No, why should they be in a low paying job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 52 and feel totally burnt out. I have been worked like a mule while steadily seeing my paychecks dwindle in value. In the 80, I drove a new Porsche, now I drive a shitty 1998 Jeep. Relearn your job constantly and be in a constant crunch. Get zero respect from your juniors and manager even though you save their butts constantly.
    I would not wish a software engineer career on anyone... unless you don't really like to make software. Then I guess its OK. Get in a few years, avoid hard and quality demanding tasks and manoeuvre to management. That is the way to make money and gain respect in the majority of the software world.

  39. Coding is becoming relatively low wage! by Invisible+Now · · Score: 1

    Due to the growing infrastructure supporting the utilization (or if you are real engineer the misuse) of offshore coders, even formerly high rate positions are dropping to $25 per hour. Not much better than the proposed $15 per hour minimum wage for counter service jobs

    --

    "Knowing everything doesn't help..."

  40. Re:ugh by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    There is zero reason to give them anything but their last paycheck on the way out the door.

    As a veteran, I pretty much agree with this. The military is 100% volunteer, and the pay is pretty good. Of course we need to take care of people that were wounded or disabled in the line of duty, but for everyone else, the handouts and entitlements are excessive.

    I imagine the pay isn't as good as in the private sector, and volunteering is more noble than otherwise. I've never served in the military, and appreciate that you and others volunteered to risk you life for the country and its people - or for others elsewhere. I have no problem with affording some of my tax dollars to help express that appreciation, even after you separate from service.

    The benefits are also heavily skewed toward those that need them the least. I used a VA loan ... which I am happy to accept but certainly don't "need". Yet many veterans living in trailer parks don't have the ability or knowledge to benefit from the same program.

    Perhaps some effort should be spent ensuring active duty personnel and veterans are offered opportunities to learn regular-world life skills so they could better benefit from these veterans' programs. The rest of us get to learn these thing while we're young and starting out, while you're learning to defend us. Giving you some opportunity to catch up with the rest of us seems reasonable.

    Of course, there will always be those you can take out of the trailer park, but can't take the trailer park out of them. (Said as someone who lived in one my first year of college, but am now 54 and a senior software developer at a large defense contractor.)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  41. Re:ugh by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    The recruitment process now has pamphlets of the benefits. Lines them up and sums them up, makes it sound like a $200k bonus for signing. At least when I last saw, around the time of the first Gulf War.

  42. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the tight budgets we already face and will be facing if the huge tax cuts go through: NO

    Why?

    Military service is voluntary. Sure, duties assigned are risky at times. But the fact is, people sign up on their own and they already receive more benefits than the average person ever receives: job hiring advantages, discounts on loans and mortgages, VA healthcare (be it good or bad, its also free!), and numerous other perks.

    If their current education benefits (whatever colleges are covered) aren't covering "coding" at normal higher education facilities, then perhaps they aren't really all that competitive enough to get into decent degree programs to begin with. On one hand, some may say "these aren't college folks" and on the other I can say "they also aren't royalty and the rest of us shouldn't be expected to treat them as such their entire lives ... let them pay their way like the rest of us are expected to!" The last thing we need is even more IT workers who are half trained "military style," who get on the job and have no clue how to really perform their IT duties because they went through some crash course. I've had to train and work with enough "certified at XYZ" vets to know that despite the requirement to give preference to their hiring, they aren't always the right folks to be on IT jobs ... clearances and all the military gibberish about "obeys orders without questioning and can shine his shoes" mean nothing when they don't have the experience to do their assigned tasks, use critical thinking skills to accurately (no military bias needed thanks) assess a situation, or respond ... you can't crash course those things, they come from the same places the rest of us had to learn them, and that is *NOT* from handing them yet another "certification."

  43. Re:ugh by Hasaf · · Score: 1

    I hate to say this; but, after you work out all the benefits, the pay in the military is significantly more than most of the people, in the military, would receive in the private sector.

  44. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know that Mr low ID didn't also serve in the military? Are you making assumptions?
    So you think vets deserve an entitlement – GI bill paid education – on top of the salary they earned while serving? Did somebody twist Mr Ex Vet's arm to enlist? He knew what the compensation package was when he enlisted and he took it.
    You think military service isn't a job? You get up five days a week, drive to "the office", put in your eight hours of work, stop on the drive home and get a six pack for the weekend? That is what a lot of our military does, when they're not deployed, and even when they are deployed it's a pretty apt description of what they do. That sounds like a job to me.
    And why didn't Mr Ex Vet who spent 12 years take night courses at the on-base university satellite while he had tuition reimbursement? He could have had his degree by the time he got out. (Hint: I got my degree taking night courses after working eight hour days.)

    Our vets certainly deserve to be treated well during and after their service, But I don't understand this whole entitlement thing. And you'd probably call me a libtard. Paul Ryan is running around saying let's dismantle Social Security because it's an entitlement (it's not) and you probably support that. Bat at the same time you think vets are entitled to something above an beyond the pay they received during their service? There's another name for people like you. It starts with the letter H and ends with ypocrite.

  45. Most vets SUCK at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I teach at a college that is a magnet for vets. I do the 200 level courses. Vets have some that are good; most suck at it. Somebody is pushing them into computers in large numbers.

    1) A lot of vets are stupid. I'm not talking about injuries, they signed up for the military out of high school because they were stupid. Some are foolish teens and grow up others are stupid and you don't grow out of that. Problem solving is a central part of it, not a lot of problem solving in the military. Plus side, dealing with really stupid organizational problems is something the military is great for acclimatizing people for the world of Dilbert.

    2) Hands-on real world type classes (which I specialize in) are more like an internship with guided work to develop skill level. This causes troubles. Emotional issues with stress that haven't been fully treated start to surface. The stress involved in development creates problems for them. Frustration etc. Development is a stressful job for most people; at minimum, it is at the beginning. High number of them give up early without a lot of motivational support.

    3) always hard working but totally not interested. it's just a job. it is like they are forced to do something horrible and are doing it because they have to... like military stuff. but they do not like it. that kind of situation repeated. problem is fostering curiosity and exploring to figure problems out rather than just getting it done quickly and out of the way. it's a "get it over with" attitude, when doing it well or trying alternatives, learning a bit about it-- are not done. this is generally a problem for short-attention span lazy millennials too. However, the older vet students one would hope would be better. they are not.

    4) ALL vets are hard workers. but a serious class will not reward you on hard work alone. A is not for effort. Used to be multiple choice exams in programming would get you fired. not anymore. sad. funnel everybody into the college system which is responding more like a business free market and you get a BS system which caters to "customers" when a real college doesn't give a fuck what the customers want. I'm still old school. If you don't like it go to a diploma mill and you'll be as good as somebody who learned Kung Fu from a book... my students will easily kick your ass. They don't get a black belt from me unless they can hold their own - not because they put in 20 hours per week.

    1. Re:Most vets SUCK at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to assume that too before I signed up out of high school. I thought most of the people would be typical jarhead morons.
      I joined the Navy and found that while there were a lot of morons, there were also plenty of people that were smart as hell and joined for the same reasons as me - It's something to do as a young person where you get to travel and see things and do things most people never get to experience in their life.

      What you aren't seeing are those of us that got out, got jobs, and don't talk about the military all the time. It would be like going on and on about high school.

      On the other hand, I often run into the idiots with the high and tight haircut that can't stop saying Semper Fi all the time.

      For a lot of people who don't have anything else going for them, being in the military is a sort of identity for them. That latch onto it and think it makes them more of a person. I knew those people when I was in the military, and I can tell you that they were not the best, and they probably stayed in as long as they could.

  46. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen here Mr low ID, the reason you are able to have the freedoms you have today is because of vets.

    Unless you're in your 80's, you aren't a vet that actually protected my freedom. You're a mercenary that does the bidding of the political elite. You skirt the Constitution by acting outside of our nation's borders to attack people in order to protect business interests in the world.

    You're the hammer for a corrupt empire. You do not preserve our freedom. You do not defend the righteous.

  47. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if that were true (in some cases it is, in some it isn't, and it NEVER should be) the article's point is still wrong.

    For-profit schools are a scam. Coder schools are a scam. There are almost no code monkey jobs in this country, they were outsourced years ago. If you don't have a CS or computer engineering degree or are a self-starting rockstar coder, you don't have a job writing software in the US. If you need to go to a for-profit school to learn how to code, you aren't employable writing software.

  48. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/too/to/

  49. Whoop-dee-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Get everybody to code" Is basically the kale of government spending right now. It's good and trendy and no one's really sure why.

    In practical terms, there's nothing that really prevents veterans from learning to code through normal means.

    1. Re:Whoop-dee-doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greed. The reason is greed. It's always greed.

      People think there are billions of dollars to be made in social media marketing, and they think coders have something to do with social media marketing.

  50. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, WWII vets, I salute my cap to you. I'll also acknowledge Korean and Vietnam vets because they were forced into it. Every war after has been utterly pointless and would not have taken my "freedoms" had it not happened. If this guy did not serve, my freedoms would be unaffected.

    I respect people that serve, even though most of them do it because they're barely got through high school and have nothing better to do. I'm fine with them getting applause, and early plane boarding, a free meal, etc. But I'm not rolling out the red carpet because he doesn't have the time for school. Deal with it. We've all got problems.

  51. Re:ugh by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    I imagine the pay isn't as good as in the private sector

    You imagine wrong. For an 18 year old high school graduate, the pay is pretty good. When you add in basic necessities that are provided for free (food, housing, ammunition), it is a pretty good deal

    ... and volunteering is more noble than otherwise.

    My reasons for joining had nothing to do with being "noble" or "serving my country" or any of that crap. It was a testosterone driven desire for adventure. I wanted to jump out of airplanes, ride in helicopters, and go see the world (Yes, I did all of those things as a Marine).

    Perhaps some effort should be spent ensuring active duty personnel and veterans are offered opportunities ...

    Veterans benefits, like any other entitlement, will always be twisted toward those that can organize, manipulate the system, and contribute to politicians, ... in other words successful people that don't really need the benefits.

    Giving you some opportunity to catch up with the rest of us seems reasonable.

    Except that we don't need to "catch up". According to the DOL, veterans are doing better than average in median income.

  52. 4 years is to long but the tech schools by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    4 years is to long but the tech schools that are not in the 2 or 4 system need some over site.

    lanwanprofessional is one where they are not very clear on what is really costs and they have the go hear and get job that pays X just like how ITT and others did it.

  53. What decade are we in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The days of becoming a programmer with no education are well behind us. As someone who dropped out of high school and ended up going to college after getting rejected constantly, I have little sympathy for this guy. I spent the time in school. I worked part time web design/development gigs with small businesses to pay the rent. It sucked, but it can be done.

    Learning how to code and how to write good software are two very different things. We reject applicants all the time that have no understanding of basic design patterns, data structures, etc. We've interviewed "experienced" .NET developers with no clue what they're doing. We've also interviewed students who are nearing graduation. Even if you do go to a university with a decent reputation, it doesn't mean you have any skills, but you at least have heard of data structures.

    CS education is a joke and encouraging a flood of cheap, unskilled coding monkeys isn't going to make it any better.

    1. Re:What decade are we in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The days of becoming a programmer with an education are over. As someone who has a master's degree in CS and someone who has written open source software, there are no jobs for me anywhere. I have proof I can write quality software, and nobody ever looks at it. They see European ancestry in the name on my resume and they reject me immediately, because I happen to be a white man.

      Coding is for unskilled brown code monkeys. Skilled programmers are not wanted.

    2. Re:What decade are we in by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Where are you applying? Big companies in small towns?

    3. Re:What decade are we in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small companies in small towns, small companies in big towns, big companies in big towns, it makes no difference. Tech is brown everywhere.

    4. Re:What decade are we in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you simply are not as good of a coder as you think you are, despite all of your paper.

      Having worked on open source software does not automatically equal good coder. In fact, if you write shitty code, having the source in the open could very well work against you.

  54. No government interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government should stay out of the vets business. Once a vet leaves the service, they government should fulfill exactly it's mandatory obligations at the time the either the vet signed up, or additional obligations based on reenlistment contract/policies.

    Since vets tend to vote republican/libertarian in much larger numbers than democrat/socialist this seems to be the appropriate policy for less government interference in their lives.

  55. Re:ugh by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    I meant catch up in other ways. Sorry if that was unclear.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  56. Re: ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a current employee at the local government level I can't get training for my job. So I should pay for my own training AND subzidize teaching veterans the skills to replace me at my job?

  57. Re:ugh by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    I meant catch up in other ways. Sorry if that was unclear.

    Okay, but I don't think there is any catching up to do. I felt like my military experience gave me a head start. When I later went to college, I had a much deeper and more mature perspective. To other students in history class, the places mentioned were just names on a map. But I had been there. I had a better understanding of the world, I had learned to speak some Japanese and Tagalog, and even more Mandarin (and eventually married a Chinese girl), and that opened a lot of opportunities in business and high-tech, especially as so much of the world's economy has shifted to Asia.

    If you want to pay higher taxes to subsidize the mortgage on my McMansion in San Jose, I am not going to refuse the money, but I certainly don't need it, and veterans in general don't need it anymore than anyone else.

  58. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The youngest World War II veterans are turning 90 now.

    There aren't many veterans on Slashdot who ever protected any American's freedom.

    There aren't many veterans still alive at all who ever protected any American's freedom.

    The rest of them? Maybe we need to stop using the word "veteran" for them at all.

    How about calling them what they are, former military-industrial complex employees?

  59. Re:Code Schools normally suck.. Gov Shouldnt fund by DarkVader · · Score: 2

    If you need more structure in your education, code monkey almost certainly isn't a good career choice for you.

    You're going to get an education more suited to writing good code from a philosophy major than you are from a coding school.

  60. Re:ugh by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    The only vets you have to worry about are the ones who carry a loaded finger gun on the bus and telling themselves, "Never surrender! Never give up!"

  61. actually, we need blue-collars trades as well by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, America needs an assortment of educated ppl. Not just white collar, but blue collar.
    As such, we need to make community colleges free (based on grades), not just to vets, but those that have graduated recently, as well as those that were laid off.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  62. The government does not pay for anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tax payers do. All of it.

    But, if you want to ask me if veterans should be taken a care of, using our tax dollars? Damned straight they should.

  63. Yes by davebarnes · · Score: 1

    "Should The Government Pay For Veterans To Attend Code Schools?"
    Only if veterans of Russian Army.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:Yes by bongey · · Score: 1

      Actually there are US Army vets that are Russian Army vets also and they weren't defectors. My room mate was one, funniest thing he did is he didn't understand suppressive fire in a 10x10 shoot house with his m249. He unloaded 150 rounds , from the hip, at a target 6-8 feet from the wall, loud as f***k being in that room.

  64. Vocations by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    The point of the coding school cannot be to learn how to code to a professional standard, because that takes years no matter how you approach it -- it's why we have the concept of a junior developer. The point of the coding school must be to learn how to learn how to program.

    Maybe this little snowflake should grow up and realize millions of people actually work there way through college studying late at night after working an 8 hour shift and then taking care of there kids.

    Your attitude is crap, and this statement is just as applicable to any coding school attendee. Do you imagine that it takes no time or money to attend those?

    Personally I'm not in a hurry to judge people for their choices, or to say that people can't be programmers. Yes, this profession requires a lot of continuing education. I don't see why this should be more concerning to the boot camp grad than the CS grad.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  65. Coding School by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First we need a "coding school" that is worth a damn. For the rest of this post I am going to say programming and not coding.

    No, these people are certainly turning out coders and not programmers. They will know git and unit testing, but they won't know Knuth or Turing from a hole in the ground.

    If such a program is to be instituted, It's going to have to be designed by the likes of Google, Canonical, and even Microsoft.

    The industry is not interested in training its own. Otherwise there wouldn't need to be these programs. But I'm taking the words "self paced" and "internship" to mean that you haven't seriously thought about this issue. Internships are not replacements for classroom instruction, and getting someone from being a complete novice to the point where it's even worth it to pair them with a more senior dev takes quite a lot of instruction.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  66. Code Mills by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2

    I disagree. The skill being taught is the ability to learn programming. I'm attending a coding academy at the moment (for reasons which are becoming increasingly obscure) and no one could possibly mistake the curriculum for a complete education, but unfortunately there's essentially no place offering anything better. CS grads can probably be trusted to have learned either Java, Python, or perhaps Javascript. They can probably discuss a bit about algorithmic complexity and may know something about compilers, parsers, and lexers. They may know something about OS design or circuit design. They may or may not have learned anything about source control. Unit testing is less likely. The actual day-to-day practice of programming will be pretty obscure. I'm betting that the average coding school graduate will have a much better handle on whether they have an affinity for programming than your average CS grad, and if there are "skills needed to succeed" they're not going to be taught at either place.

    We likely need a further bridge between the coding school and the real world (some sort of apprenticeship, say), but providing these services is pretty expensive. The industry isn't stepping up. The private sector is finding it difficult (from conversations and observing a few schools go under). Does government have a role to play here?

    To answer my own rhetorical question to some degree, the DoL is actually running a study to see if it's worthwhile to give veterans and people who suffered from the 2008 crash (career-wise) grants to attend coding school. It's called Reboot Northwest. So, whilst we argue, others are gathering data, but there are of course both philosophical and practical matters at stake.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  67. you can retire half pay at 38 too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you enlisted at 18 giving you 20 years. Less than 20 years nada. Most US retirement programs require 55+ or a age+service threshhold.

  68. Code schools give certification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More useful than self study

  69. They already do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But schools like Phoenix etc, are for profit pyramid schemes. Start at a community college, do well get scholarships, and grants. After that the GI Bill is just a nice, but unnecessary item.

  70. Re:ugh by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Probably because, they don't know, how to use commas, either.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  71. Re: ugh by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    So I should pay for my own training AND subzidize teaching veterans the skills to replace me at my job?

    I don't think the veterans referred to in TFA are ex-members of the Punjab Fusliers.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  72. Scope creep by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Shit, folks, the federal government can't even run its veterans' hospitals well. And you want to give it more to screw up?

    When they've gotten the hang of that existing responsibility, then it might make sense to expand their responsibilities. Not before.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  73. Re:ugh by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

    I felt like my military experience gave me a head start. When I later went to college, I had a much deeper and more mature perspective. To other students in history class, the places mentioned were just names on a map. But I had been there. I had a better understanding of the world,

    A bit off topic... I agreed to your statement here. Though, I would add that it is not just military experience, but rather any real life experience would give a head start in college education. Simply go directly from high school to college isn't for most people. Majority of them should at least come out of school and work in order to see what the real world is. Then they should get some ideas about what they are expecting before they go back to take higher education. The real world experience will help them understand how to study and what to look for in the future from the education.

  74. Train then outsource, repeat by ThatNakedGuy · · Score: 1

    Sure, train them for a job that is being frequently outsourced to the 3rd world.
    Then re-train them again for whatever is job fashionable. Repeat until money is exhausted.
    We need trade schools to teach skills that cant be so easily outsourced. Maybe Industrial Robot Repair,

  75. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedic by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    > He was paid wages for hose 12 years. He got *exactly* what he deserves.

    He gave up the best young years of his life to defend your freedom while you were getting your education. Now that he's done, he should be able to get his education. Even if he got married during his young years, as you might have done.

    Another point -- whether or not he had to fight in a war to defend your freedom is beyond his control. What he did is volunteer to be trained and serve, and even fight and die for your and my freedom. If a genuine threat to our nation emerged, or even outright war, he would be the first one fighting. He did a lot more than just have a job. He put his life at some jeopardy in the event that he is ordered to go to war -- whether justified or not.

    If he wants to get married at a young age, just as you might, why should he be denied that? Why should it work against him once he gets out of the military and now wants the opportunity to get an education -- which was a benefit promised when he signed up. He chose to delay his education in order to serve his country.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  76. Only veterans? by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Scholarships for vocational programs is one of the most useful and biggest payoff services that a government can provide. And coding schools can be extremely inexpensive as they can be largely automated and teachers outsourced to countries with reasonable labor costs. We can in fact argue if we need scholarships as such or make classes so inexpensive that a scholarship is not usually needed.

  77. Absolutely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely! I don't know how it's even a question! We should also make it mandatory for anyone who is enrolled in any welfare program. It doesn't have to be just coding. Anything technology. We need tech people and we have an endless supply of people that can have their lives changed while helping fill positions that are in high demand!

  78. Sounds like MCSE bootcamps from the 90s by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    Being on the IT side of the house, I distinctly remember MCSE, Solaris and other for-profit bootcamps popping up towards the top of the dotcom bubble in the late 90s. They also loudly touted the fact that they accepted veterans' benefits as payment and I'm sure they made a lot of money doing this -- similar to the ITT Tech or DeVry style schools.

    I guess my question is what a coder bootcamp prepares you to do. Do they just teach one or two JavaScript frameworks like node.js or Ruby on Rails or something? What is a coder bootcamp graduate supposed to be able to do? I actually went to one of these places to rapidly upgrade my Windows NT certs (which I did on my own) to Windows 2003 -- I was working for a consulting company back then who wanted to bill me out at a higher rate. I felt bad because there were obviously a few people in the class who had been sold the dream and had no clue what was going on, no aptitude for anything IT-related, etc. I'm betting there will be a fair number of veterans who will be "encouraged" to use their one-time education benefit to go through one of these coding schools. I'm just assuming that the only job you can get out of one of these schools is front-end web code cleanup or QA testing or something equally low-end -- am I right?

  79. Only if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if the 'code schools' are actual universities, and not just for veterans. There are so many more jobs than programmers, no-one should be paying to go to 'code school' so long as you keep your grades up.

  80. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He gave up the best young years of his life to defend your freedom while you were getting your education."

    No, he decided to take a high risk, low paying job defending corporate interests overseas. When has our 'police actions' ever been about defending freedom? That's just empty platitude hawked by salesmen called 'recruiters', war movies, and patriotic video games.

  81. Re: ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither do you, evidently, but you think that you do.

  82. Re:ugh by NoSalt · · Score: 1

    It was, actually, pretty easy for me to use my G.I. Bill.

  83. Re: "But with a wife and family, he couldn't dedic by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you believe that we could never face a legitimate crisis of defending our freedom or even our existence.

    I understand how the military gets misused by politicians owned by corporations. That doesn't mean we don't need to have a military in case a genuine, non-contrived need were to arise. I believe we should take care of these people. Educating them for a good job is probably better for society than letting them rot and have to be supported by taxpayers. Given the opportunity for education, I believe most ex-military people might probably have better motivation and ambition.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  84. Re:Code Schools normally suck.. Gov Shouldnt fund by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    That's why your code sucks. No structure. You could have used more structure in your life, rather than bashing those who operate better with defined goals.

    The best coders understand this and spend 20% or more working as a BA, making sure that the results match the expectations. Something going to a structured program with a fixed syllabus helps teach. Rather than feral code monkeys that are flinging brown code on the wall to see what sticks.

  85. Re:Code Schools normally suck.. Gov Shouldnt fund by DarkVader · · Score: 1

    My code doesn't suck, because I'm not a coder. Tiny bits of scripting are all I'll touch. I don't have the patience for it. Most of my time is interacting with users, assessing their needs, and making the machines work to do what they need (and sometimes what they want).

    But the best coders learned how to code starting as kids, taking apart code and learning how it works, adding stuff to it, making it better, finding bugs and fixing them. They did it on their own, not being taught. By the time they got to college, they had already written parts of operating systems, spent summers interning at Apple, and got degrees in whatever, sometimes CS, sometimes engineering, sometimes philosophy. They work at places like Apple and Google, they're the ones that make operating systems work, write code that lets you talk to your computer, they write compilers, they write kernels.

  86. Re:ugh by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    True, but I've never had a job where I couldn't decide where in the country to live, or one that was likely to get me shot at, especially without the option of hitting the dirt and waiting for people who knew what they were doing to deal with the shooters.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes