So you trust the cops word, even after a criminal conviction for their actions? Plainclothes police in a no-knock raid, and you still trust their professional judgment?
The "evidence" shows that the police executed an illegal raid, and executed a civilian during that illegal home invasion. They confessed to planting drugs. They didn't confess to planting a gun. So is that is proof in your eyes that they'd never plant a gun, just drugs?
I didn't see any reports of GSR on the deceased. Nor was there a report of finding the bullet fired.
And the cops hit their target 10% of the time. If they weren't fired and in jail, they could have used more time on the range, anyway.
Consent to torture? He was threatened with violence if he didn't do what they ordered.
"I'm going to kidnap you and hold you indefinitely unless you sign into Facebook in my presence" is signing in "consent"? Sounds like rape isn't rape unless she fought back hard enough.
Note the only claim that she fired first is by police, who were prosecuted for the act. They claim she fired after they announced themselves. For all we know, they never announced themselves, or while planting the marijuana, found a gun in a different room and fired one shot with it and planted it on her.
What amazes me is that after everything else is proven a lie, they still took the convicted criminal's words for the sequence of events.
If I claim to be a Scotsman, but yet I am not a citizen of Scotland, I am not Scottish, I have no Scottish ancestry, and I have never even visited Scotland, and then someone claims I am not actually a Scotsman at all, inevitably someone would try to counter with a canned "lololol No True Scotsman fallacy!" retort.
Is she a member of a Catholic church? Were her parents members of a Catholic church? Then she's already beat your standard.
No, legal representation is between the person and a JUDGE.. Not a monkey in a costume with a tin badge.
So a suspect shouldn't have legal representation in the presence of a cop?
You are the one that's insane.
Not true. In just about ever police department there is a policy requirement to provide name, badge number and name of your supervisor. Furthermore, just about every STATE has that legal requirement written into state law.
Did you read "at this moment"? Are they requred by law to have the next words out of their mouth be name, badge, and supervisor? If so, then "what's your name" repeated faster than they can say their name is a DOS on cops.
If they are allowed to finish their task before answering, I'm right and you are wrong. Cops don't have to stop what they are doing to answer. They can give their name and badge at the end of the interaction, and don't have to give it when demanded.
Since every state and almost every police department has rules on it, if I'm wrong, you should be able to quote a law that proves me wrong. Go ahead. We'll wait. I don't expect an answer.
Has there ever been a copper line laid on those routes? If so, how was that done?
Insanely, if we had underwater power near the underwater fiber, we could inductively power powered fiber regenerators or amps. Some of the first long-line fiber runs ran copper along side for power. So there was actual power delivered across the oceans, but not for commercial use on the other side (the tech was such that they needed frequent regeneration and amplification).
That's my business officer. I already told you I will not answer questions.
"I offered you legal representation, and you refused. You have now waived your rights."
You are required by police policy and state law to provide this information and I need it to start legal proceedings.
"I am not required to answer that or any other questions at this moment. Your continued refusal to cooperate will result in an resisting arrest charge."
Yes you can. Power from WA feeds FL (eventually, indirectly, and with limits), and you have the commercial agreements between suppliers and consumers. Yes, you can't guarantee you get WA electrons in FL, but you could generate enough "extra" power in WA to run FL, and generate zero power in FL.
as far as I know we do not have such a thing like Europe/Asia/Africa grid
There are some parts of Europe shipping electricity to Africa now. And some movement of Electricity across the Africa/Asia border. So Africa is connected to Europe and Asia. How well it shares beyond that, I don't know. I would presume some power goes between Asia and Europe as well. But I haven't seen any details on that part.
Most of the hard work is done. Well, aside from leaving power lines up in the middle of wars. There are some spots that need more work, but a global grid isn't as absurd as so many here tell me. We already have most of the lines laid, we just need the political part, and a few intercontinental lines(the hard ones, across oceans). And, as you say, get the local grids to work as reliably as the "civilized" world expects..
Step one is connect everything. Losses at high voltage aren't that significant. Once you have everyone connected, then the local generation of more variable/intermittent sources will have a greater impact. When it's high enough, then the problems go away.
You have good English for a non-native speaker, but you seem to use big words you don't understand. "subventioned" for one (addressed elsewhere), and "abided" for another. "Obligated" would be correct. "Abided" means "obeyed". And "Suppliers are obeyed by law to add taxation" doesn't make sense. "Required" or "obligated" would work.
Most people in Germany do not have their own house, but live in rented apartments.
Most Germans live in rented accommodation, but most live in houses. 43% own houses they live in. Some live in houses they rent (the stat you pretend doesn't exist). So most Germans live in houses. Yes, most don't own their own houses, but they live in places with the possibility or installing any kind of power generator. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Pub...
When your numbers are wrong, how can we believe the rest of it?
Slashdot Mirror
So you trust the cops word, even after a criminal conviction for their actions? Plainclothes police in a no-knock raid, and you still trust their professional judgment?
The "evidence" shows that the police executed an illegal raid, and executed a civilian during that illegal home invasion. They confessed to planting drugs. They didn't confess to planting a gun. So is that is proof in your eyes that they'd never plant a gun, just drugs?
I didn't see any reports of GSR on the deceased. Nor was there a report of finding the bullet fired.
And the cops hit their target 10% of the time. If they weren't fired and in jail, they could have used more time on the range, anyway.
What part of his story doesn't "add up"?
"I don't need change" didn't work? I'd have followed that up with "OK officer, you are refusing to accept cash for this fee. Is that right?"
Of course, I may have ended up sitting next to your friend.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K...
Among hundreds more.
I have no idea why ANYBODY would even consent
Consent to torture? He was threatened with violence if he didn't do what they ordered.
"I'm going to kidnap you and hold you indefinitely unless you sign into Facebook in my presence" is signing in "consent"? Sounds like rape isn't rape unless she fought back hard enough.
Note the only claim that she fired first is by police, who were prosecuted for the act. They claim she fired after they announced themselves. For all we know, they never announced themselves, or while planting the marijuana, found a gun in a different room and fired one shot with it and planted it on her.
What amazes me is that after everything else is proven a lie, they still took the convicted criminal's words for the sequence of events.
Why does them having sex instantly mean I have a bill to pay?
Because you are using the services of the only women willing to have sex with you. Prostitutes.
What, and no complaint you aren't allowed to see the kid you are paying for?
"The contraceptive methods opposed by the two companies include the emergency contraceptives Plan B and ella, and two intrauterine devices (IUDs)."
RTFA. They opposed "after the fact" options like IUDs.
If I claim to be a Scotsman, but yet I am not a citizen of Scotland, I am not Scottish, I have no Scottish ancestry, and I have never even visited Scotland, and then someone claims I am not actually a Scotsman at all, inevitably someone would try to counter with a canned "lololol No True Scotsman fallacy!" retort.
Is she a member of a Catholic church? Were her parents members of a Catholic church? Then she's already beat your standard.
It is unconscionable for them to be forced to provide benefits that are in opposition to their morals.
So Christian Scientists should be completely exempt?
No, legal representation is between the person and a JUDGE.. Not a monkey in a costume with a tin badge.
So a suspect shouldn't have legal representation in the presence of a cop?
You are the one that's insane.
Not true. In just about ever police department there is a policy requirement to provide name, badge number and name of your supervisor. Furthermore, just about every STATE has that legal requirement written into state law.
Did you read "at this moment"? Are they requred by law to have the next words out of their mouth be name, badge, and supervisor? If so, then "what's your name" repeated faster than they can say their name is a DOS on cops.
If they are allowed to finish their task before answering, I'm right and you are wrong. Cops don't have to stop what they are doing to answer. They can give their name and badge at the end of the interaction, and don't have to give it when demanded.
Since every state and almost every police department has rules on it, if I'm wrong, you should be able to quote a law that proves me wrong. Go ahead. We'll wait. I don't expect an answer.
Has there ever been a copper line laid on those routes? If so, how was that done?
Insanely, if we had underwater power near the underwater fiber, we could inductively power powered fiber regenerators or amps. Some of the first long-line fiber runs ran copper along side for power. So there was actual power delivered across the oceans, but not for commercial use on the other side (the tech was such that they needed frequent regeneration and amplification).
That's my business officer. I already told you I will not answer questions.
"I offered you legal representation, and you refused. You have now waived your rights."
You are required by police policy and state law to provide this information and I need it to start legal proceedings.
"I am not required to answer that or any other questions at this moment. Your continued refusal to cooperate will result in an resisting arrest charge."
Yes you can. Power from WA feeds FL (eventually, indirectly, and with limits), and you have the commercial agreements between suppliers and consumers. Yes, you can't guarantee you get WA electrons in FL, but you could generate enough "extra" power in WA to run FL, and generate zero power in FL.
My point was that when you "buy" the software, you don't "own" it.
Then what did you mean by:
If you don't like the deal you're getting, go somewhere else.
If there's nowhere else I can go, then your statement is wrong and misleading.
as far as I know we do not have such a thing like Europe/Asia/Africa grid
There are some parts of Europe shipping electricity to Africa now. And some movement of Electricity across the Africa/Asia border. So Africa is connected to Europe and Asia. How well it shares beyond that, I don't know. I would presume some power goes between Asia and Europe as well. But I haven't seen any details on that part.
Most of the hard work is done. Well, aside from leaving power lines up in the middle of wars. There are some spots that need more work, but a global grid isn't as absurd as so many here tell me. We already have most of the lines laid, we just need the political part, and a few intercontinental lines(the hard ones, across oceans). And, as you say, get the local grids to work as reliably as the "civilized" world expects..
So you were recommending an impossible course of action, as if it's possible. Why?
Or was your point that the "free market" can't exist when patents and copyrights do?
Transmission costs aren't that high. Local generation is best. but in the absence of local generation, remote generation is used.
So where can I go buy a copy of "Game of Thrones" where I own it?
Step one is connect everything. Losses at high voltage aren't that significant. Once you have everyone connected, then the local generation of more variable/intermittent sources will have a greater impact. When it's high enough, then the problems go away.
The US grid loses about 3%, and covers a continent. I didn't neglect the variable. I included it
You have good English for a non-native speaker, but you seem to use big words you don't understand. "subventioned" for one (addressed elsewhere), and "abided" for another. "Obligated" would be correct. "Abided" means "obeyed". And "Suppliers are obeyed by law to add taxation" doesn't make sense. "Required" or "obligated" would work.
You build an insulated house. I'm not in Germany, but in the middle or winter, I have the heat off and the windows open most of the time.
Most people in Germany do not have their own house, but live in rented apartments.
Most Germans live in rented accommodation, but most live in houses. 43% own houses they live in. Some live in houses they rent (the stat you pretend doesn't exist). So most Germans live in houses. Yes, most don't own their own houses, but they live in places with the possibility or installing any kind of power generator.
https://www.destatis.de/DE/Pub...
When your numbers are wrong, how can we believe the rest of it?