The people in those locations would have exactly the same vote as everyone else.
Also, you could get rid of the EC and still have the rural bias in place. If a vote from someone in CA is 1 vote, then give someone in MT a vote of 1.00001. That's about right to adjust for the rural bias already there, and mixes the votes such that you don't have a 50.1% in a state give 100% of the states electoral votes, which is the biggest problem with the current implementation of the EC.
The Facebook 'news stories' were pre-election and seemed to be designed to deify Hillary and vilify Trump in an attempt to effect the outcome of the election.
I saw plenty of fake news vilifying both sides. Seems you are lying, ignorant, or suffer from confirmation bias. And no, I'm not stating the numbers of fake stories was equal, but that they were there for both. They seemed to be more shared vilifying Trump, but sharing fake stories is separate from creating them and posting them.
This just seems like more sour grapes and conspiracy theories from those for whom the election didn't go their way.
That's rich, when Trump started complaining of the conspiracy before the election even started. As soon as he won, it was operating as expected.
Pointing out something is unfair is "ignorant"? Everyone here knows exactly how it works, and why. But even those that wrote the Constitution knew they screwed it up. Those that voted on the 12th Amendment to change some aspects of the EC were some of the same people that wrote the Constitution in the first place.
With the large urban migration (and Blacks now being 5/5th of a person), it seems reasonable to consider that the demographics of the country have changed sufficiently to re-examine the validity of the EC. I fail to see how a position like that is "ignorant" and instead, it seems you dictate "truth" and insult anyone who questions it. People with your mental illness should stay off the Internet.
HFT explicitly manipulates market price and liquidity. HFT is synonymous with HFT queue-jumping. And the crash was caused by HFT. This guy was the only demonstrable contributor to the crash that wasn't a registered HFT shop. If HFT didn't exist, the crash would have been impossible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... I'm well above the US, and we are so far ahead that we can pay extra to have our power be renewable-only. Yes, I know how that works, but I have solar on my house to cover my usage.
autopilot in an aircraft requires a pilot in the pilot seat. So how is "autopilot" incorrect? Because it's a term used in sci-fi to refer to (true) AI-driven spacecraft? Seems like that's an issue with the users. I never assumed "autopilot" meant "AI-driven car".
My grid is almost all renewables. That issue is separate anyway, as the grid can upgrade without regard to what the load is used for. So "upgrade" the cars, while separately working on upgrading the grid. Cheaper and faster results than doing one at a time, waiting until the other is 100% done before starting the other.
That is ignoring the additional problems with the complex chemistry, manufacture, and eventual disposal of batteries versus steel and aluminum engines.
The batteries are almost 100% renewable, so best you do "ignore" them, rather than reveal your bias and ignorance.
Almost certainly not better when everything is accounted for.
Lower energy per mile. Lower demand on fossil fuel. Win all around. Account for everything, and electrics/plug-in-hybrids are better, by far.
Back before humans controlled the rivers, that'd be enough. The floods would fill the swamps, and the swamps would be wet until the next flood. Now, with levees and canals, the floods are directed to the ocean, so the ground doesn't get the water, the ocean does. Then we complain the ground is dry. Like we didn't know how rain works.
Yup. At most, it'll be used for billion dollar corporate espionage, or a little government spying, but unless you are CEO of Toyota, or head of a government, you have nothing to worry about.
What's the battery life supposed to be? I get about 12 hours batter life, with the GoPro "off". The batter life when off is horrible. WiFi manages to spontaniously turn itself on while "off" and drain the battery. I'd love to be able to 100% disable the WiFi, but it turns on every time I pull the battery, which I have to do daily because the GoPro locks up often.
My phone is really good, and gives my 4kGoPro a run for its money. But the GoPro loses because I have to re-flash the firmware once a week to be able to record more than 3 seconds. Some massive software bug, but no development on the "old" ones, despite having reported the issue long before the replacement was out. A token discount off the new model was the offer for a broken GoPro under warranty.
We are already socialist.. Mass taxes, and huge payouts to corporations who park their profits off shore. We effectively pay corporations to stash cash in Ireland.
You make it "socialism vs capitalism" and Republicans are the socialists, with private profits, but public risk, and the Democrats are capitalists, trying to hold banks and energy companies responsible for their risks by cutting payouts and subsidies.
Go Pro stock should drop. As an owner of a GoPro Hero 3 Black as my first GoPro, I'll never buy another. It doesn't work well, and the support is horrible. The battery life is pathetic. The video quality is great. But you can get 4k on phones now. They need to get the rest of their shit working if they want to stay relevant.
Which is why if a major party had run anyone other than those two, they would likely have won. Didn't appear to matter for the Republicans, as they won anywy, but the Democrats could have run Jimmy Carter again, or Ruth Ginsberg, or Bob the Builder and done better than they did with Hillary.
Consider who conducted those polls. Based on how they were predicting a Hillary landslide victory and it turned out to be anything but, you have to realize just how badly they were lying to everyone in the process trying to manipulate the entire thing.
They did the same thing in the primaries and it worked, so why would they think it wouldn't work in the general election? The Democratic Establishment published that Bernie had no chance of winning when he was ahead of where Obama was 8 years ago, so he obviously had a chance. But this time, it worked. They drove voters away from the party. This got the preferred candidate selected, but the abused voters didn't return in the general election. The Hillary campaign got what it asked for. It got Democratic voters to stay away from the party.
At least now the Republicans will shut up about Trump being a joke candidate designed to be the only person Hillary could beat to get the presidency. Even your own conspiracy theories against your party are stupid and (obviously, now), false.
It was predicted in the primaries. Hillary Clinton was the weakest possible candidate against Trump. If the party had rallied around Bernie Sanders, Trump would have lost. So many of the Trump votes were anti-Hillary protest votes. A vote for Hillary in the primaries was a vote for Trump.
Slashdot Mirror
Apple has it. They are trying to control the spin now.
http://www.news.com.au/technol...
Only in China?
The people in those locations would have exactly the same vote as everyone else.
Also, you could get rid of the EC and still have the rural bias in place. If a vote from someone in CA is 1 vote, then give someone in MT a vote of 1.00001. That's about right to adjust for the rural bias already there, and mixes the votes such that you don't have a 50.1% in a state give 100% of the states electoral votes, which is the biggest problem with the current implementation of the EC.
The Facebook 'news stories' were pre-election and seemed to be designed to deify Hillary and vilify Trump in an attempt to effect the outcome of the election.
I saw plenty of fake news vilifying both sides. Seems you are lying, ignorant, or suffer from confirmation bias. And no, I'm not stating the numbers of fake stories was equal, but that they were there for both. They seemed to be more shared vilifying Trump, but sharing fake stories is separate from creating them and posting them.
This just seems like more sour grapes and conspiracy theories from those for whom the election didn't go their way.
That's rich, when Trump started complaining of the conspiracy before the election even started. As soon as he won, it was operating as expected.
Pointing out something is unfair is "ignorant"? Everyone here knows exactly how it works, and why. But even those that wrote the Constitution knew they screwed it up. Those that voted on the 12th Amendment to change some aspects of the EC were some of the same people that wrote the Constitution in the first place.
With the large urban migration (and Blacks now being 5/5th of a person), it seems reasonable to consider that the demographics of the country have changed sufficiently to re-examine the validity of the EC. I fail to see how a position like that is "ignorant" and instead, it seems you dictate "truth" and insult anyone who questions it. People with your mental illness should stay off the Internet.
HFT explicitly manipulates market price and liquidity. HFT is synonymous with HFT queue-jumping. And the crash was caused by HFT. This guy was the only demonstrable contributor to the crash that wasn't a registered HFT shop. If HFT didn't exist, the crash would have been impossible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... I'm well above the US, and we are so far ahead that we can pay extra to have our power be renewable-only. Yes, I know how that works, but I have solar on my house to cover my usage.
autopilot in an aircraft requires a pilot in the pilot seat. So how is "autopilot" incorrect? Because it's a term used in sci-fi to refer to (true) AI-driven spacecraft? Seems like that's an issue with the users. I never assumed "autopilot" meant "AI-driven car".
That is ignoring the additional problems with the complex chemistry, manufacture, and eventual disposal of batteries versus steel and aluminum engines.
The batteries are almost 100% renewable, so best you do "ignore" them, rather than reveal your bias and ignorance.
Almost certainly not better when everything is accounted for.
Lower energy per mile. Lower demand on fossil fuel. Win all around. Account for everything, and electrics/plug-in-hybrids are better, by far.
Back before humans controlled the rivers, that'd be enough. The floods would fill the swamps, and the swamps would be wet until the next flood. Now, with levees and canals, the floods are directed to the ocean, so the ground doesn't get the water, the ocean does. Then we complain the ground is dry. Like we didn't know how rain works.
Captain Freedom should be appointed Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense. Nobody messes with Captain Freedom.
Yup. At most, it'll be used for billion dollar corporate espionage, or a little government spying, but unless you are CEO of Toyota, or head of a government, you have nothing to worry about.
If he had paid the right people and bought a seat on the exchange, they'd have called it HFT and it wouldn't have been an issue.
But manipulate prices from your garage, and off to prison for you.
So, calories are unrelated to weight? I hear the opposite here and elsewhere all the time. And there are hundreds of studies that support that.
What's the battery life supposed to be? I get about 12 hours batter life, with the GoPro "off". The batter life when off is horrible. WiFi manages to spontaniously turn itself on while "off" and drain the battery. I'd love to be able to 100% disable the WiFi, but it turns on every time I pull the battery, which I have to do daily because the GoPro locks up often.
My phone is really good, and gives my 4kGoPro a run for its money. But the GoPro loses because I have to re-flash the firmware once a week to be able to record more than 3 seconds. Some massive software bug, but no development on the "old" ones, despite having reported the issue long before the replacement was out. A token discount off the new model was the offer for a broken GoPro under warranty.
Parties trying to manipulate their "enemy" isn't a conspiracy theory. It's BAU. The conspiracy theory is that Trump was in on it.
We are already socialist.. Mass taxes, and huge payouts to corporations who park their profits off shore. We effectively pay corporations to stash cash in Ireland.
You make it "socialism vs capitalism" and Republicans are the socialists, with private profits, but public risk, and the Democrats are capitalists, trying to hold banks and energy companies responsible for their risks by cutting payouts and subsidies.
Go Pro stock should drop. As an owner of a GoPro Hero 3 Black as my first GoPro, I'll never buy another. It doesn't work well, and the support is horrible. The battery life is pathetic. The video quality is great. But you can get 4k on phones now. They need to get the rest of their shit working if they want to stay relevant.
Which is why if a major party had run anyone other than those two, they would likely have won. Didn't appear to matter for the Republicans, as they won anywy, but the Democrats could have run Jimmy Carter again, or Ruth Ginsberg, or Bob the Builder and done better than they did with Hillary.
Consider who conducted those polls. Based on how they were predicting a Hillary landslide victory and it turned out to be anything but, you have to realize just how badly they were lying to everyone in the process trying to manipulate the entire thing.
They did the same thing in the primaries and it worked, so why would they think it wouldn't work in the general election? The Democratic Establishment published that Bernie had no chance of winning when he was ahead of where Obama was 8 years ago, so he obviously had a chance. But this time, it worked. They drove voters away from the party. This got the preferred candidate selected, but the abused voters didn't return in the general election. The Hillary campaign got what it asked for. It got Democratic voters to stay away from the party.
The Bush administration knew the yellow cake was a lie before Bush talked about it. Bush had more information than those that voted on it.
The superdelegates had nothing to do with it. If *every* superdelegate had voted Sanders, Hillary would still have won.
At least now the Republicans will shut up about Trump being a joke candidate designed to be the only person Hillary could beat to get the presidency. Even your own conspiracy theories against your party are stupid and (obviously, now), false.
It was predicted in the primaries. Hillary Clinton was the weakest possible candidate against Trump. If the party had rallied around Bernie Sanders, Trump would have lost. So many of the Trump votes were anti-Hillary protest votes. A vote for Hillary in the primaries was a vote for Trump.