That's because the history of "self defense" is to pick a fight, and turn it into a duel. Duels are "self defense". So Duels for everyone, and we call them self defense.
It’s just not enough to search for criminal history, we need an invasive search for mental health issues.
Everyone I know with depression refuses to get help because a single confirmed diagnosis of depression is worse for getting a job and all that than a felony conviction.
All you'd do with that "search" is to increase the number of undiagnosed people with mental issues.
Satanism is Christian. Satan is Christian. Satan is a Biblical angel. He fell, then decided to "break" man by educating him. Satanism is belif in God, but reversal of the "good" and "bad" sides. Satan wants to educate and improve humanity. God wants to be worshipped. God is the selfish entity in Satanism, and Satan is the benevolent and loving one. Same Bible. Same God. Different interpretation.
One must believe in Satan to worship him, thus Satanism is a form of Christianity.
Atheism in the early use of the word, meant anyone who didn't affirmatively belive in God. This would mean that all modern agnostics would be a subset of atheist. Though early agnostics meant those that believed in God, but knew it was unprovable. Today's definition of agnostic doesn't allow for that. Agnostic defaults to the atheist view.
This was deliberately by design, done by the church to create a schism within atheism to separate "hard" and "soft" and get them arguing with themselves. But there is no "religion" around atheism. Any worship that denies God can be an atheist church, but there is no organization or agreement between them. The Church of Charles Manson isn't a real religion, but is as close as atheism comes.
The key is owned by MS, and never by anyone else. MS lets others use it, for a fee, and can cancel that, according to the contract, and it will never be "theft".
Nope. Amazon has done the same. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07... Amazon confusingly sold a book that they had the right to sell in Australia, but not the US, and rather than buy the correct rights in the US and honor the sale, they canceled the sale and "stole" back the sold book. The vendor doesn't eat it, the consumer does. The laws are anti-consumer.
That's how I've seen places get around that. They refuse the sale of the object, and correct the error, then reoffer the item at the correct price. Violates no laws.
After the customer has left with the item, the store cannot come back and decide they want to change the price,
Correct, and when all you buy is a license, you never leave the store with it.
The store is liable if their employees priced an item incorrectly.
Nope. If the price at the register isn't the same as on the shelf, the price is the one the store lets you pay for it. That most stores will honor the shelf price doesn't make it a legal requirement (unless it could be construed as a separate violation, like bait and switch).
Nope. I live in a country with much much stronger consumer protection laws than the US, and MS could have done what they did without issue. Obvious errors are errors. You don't need to honor an obvious honest mistake. You do need to honor a dishonest mistake, and honor an honest mistake that isn't obvious, but an obvious mistake doesn't need to be honored.
The point is if you take 8 phones and lay them out next to each other, I'd have the specs he requires.8x2G RAM, 8x128G HD, and all that. And the battery could keep the whole array working for a week on standby, or a few hours at peak usage. So why can't someone put that in a single form factor? It'd meet the specs of at least one person, the guy asking the question.
They had enough budget to buy planes, but were likely not allowed to buy a backup, they were required to use a Congressman's son's IT services company to do it, which is why it didn't happen. They don't have the power to be competent. The government has outlawed government competency. But that's what you get when one of the major parties campaigns on a "hate the government" platform.
The conditions of the formation of the rock are very different. You are an idiot in search of a fight. And you look to be pushing a particular agenda you know to be stupid, so you don't even want to state or defend it. Just insulting everyone. "Since science isn't perfect, nothing it says can be trusted" What a Luddite.
Slashdot Mirror
Spirituality is unrelated to atheism. You can be either, both, or neither, without issue.
So setting a tack on a seat is assault and battery as well?
So, it's like a mousetrap. It's a "machine", but not a robot. It's "autonomous" in that humans don't trigger the response (other than the "victim").
OMFG, mousetraps are evil AI that doesn't follow the 3-laws! We need 3-laws safe mousetraps.
Atheism is a philosophy,
That's just silly. That some treat it as such doesn't make it true. Not believing in God isn't a philosophy. It's the default stance of all beings.
That's because the history of "self defense" is to pick a fight, and turn it into a duel. Duels are "self defense". So Duels for everyone, and we call them self defense.
The research clearly shows that you are more likely to be shot by your 4 year old with your gun than stop a mass shooting with it.
A purely destructive opinion shouldn't be given. It adds nothing to the discussion. It doesn't help or solve anything.
It’s just not enough to search for criminal history, we need an invasive search for mental health issues.
Everyone I know with depression refuses to get help because a single confirmed diagnosis of depression is worse for getting a job and all that than a felony conviction.
All you'd do with that "search" is to increase the number of undiagnosed people with mental issues.
Actually helping people is a better solution.
Satanism is Christian. Satan is Christian. Satan is a Biblical angel. He fell, then decided to "break" man by educating him. Satanism is belif in God, but reversal of the "good" and "bad" sides. Satan wants to educate and improve humanity. God wants to be worshipped. God is the selfish entity in Satanism, and Satan is the benevolent and loving one. Same Bible. Same God. Different interpretation.
One must believe in Satan to worship him, thus Satanism is a form of Christianity.
Atheism in the early use of the word, meant anyone who didn't affirmatively belive in God. This would mean that all modern agnostics would be a subset of atheist. Though early agnostics meant those that believed in God, but knew it was unprovable. Today's definition of agnostic doesn't allow for that. Agnostic defaults to the atheist view.
This was deliberately by design, done by the church to create a schism within atheism to separate "hard" and "soft" and get them arguing with themselves. But there is no "religion" around atheism. Any worship that denies God can be an atheist church, but there is no organization or agreement between them. The Church of Charles Manson isn't a real religion, but is as close as atheism comes.
The key is owned by MS, and never by anyone else. MS lets others use it, for a fee, and can cancel that, according to the contract, and it will never be "theft".
Nope. Amazon has done the same. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07... Amazon confusingly sold a book that they had the right to sell in Australia, but not the US, and rather than buy the correct rights in the US and honor the sale, they canceled the sale and "stole" back the sold book. The vendor doesn't eat it, the consumer does. The laws are anti-consumer.
That's how I've seen places get around that. They refuse the sale of the object, and correct the error, then reoffer the item at the correct price. Violates no laws.
Was the free Windows 10 upgrade a mistake too?
It was heavily advertised as free, so obviously not a mistake. Is everyone on Slashdot autistic? unable to understand empathy, or subjective logic.
The obvious mistake was a mistake. The obvious non-mistake wasn't a mistake. How is that confusing to hundreds here?
For all your law talk, you missed that contracts must be entered into in "good faith". A computer error violates that.
After the customer has left with the item, the store cannot come back and decide they want to change the price,
Correct, and when all you buy is a license, you never leave the store with it.
The store is liable if their employees priced an item incorrectly.
Nope. If the price at the register isn't the same as on the shelf, the price is the one the store lets you pay for it. That most stores will honor the shelf price doesn't make it a legal requirement (unless it could be construed as a separate violation, like bait and switch).
Nope. I live in a country with much much stronger consumer protection laws than the US, and MS could have done what they did without issue. Obvious errors are errors. You don't need to honor an obvious honest mistake. You do need to honor a dishonest mistake, and honor an honest mistake that isn't obvious, but an obvious mistake doesn't need to be honored.
The point is if you take 8 phones and lay them out next to each other, I'd have the specs he requires.8x2G RAM, 8x128G HD, and all that. And the battery could keep the whole array working for a week on standby, or a few hours at peak usage. So why can't someone put that in a single form factor? It'd meet the specs of at least one person, the guy asking the question.
They had enough budget to buy planes, but were likely not allowed to buy a backup, they were required to use a Congressman's son's IT services company to do it, which is why it didn't happen. They don't have the power to be competent. The government has outlawed government competency. But that's what you get when one of the major parties campaigns on a "hate the government" platform.
If none of the qualifiers are needed, why include those superfluous words?
Unless the cost of medical treatment would cause bankruptcy. And don't trust doctors, American doctors kill many people through malpractice.
This was big-date people doing medical research, not physicians, so hopefully they did it right.
The population can change, but unless the population changes, the results should remain consistent.
Past performance is indicative of future performance, but the disclaimer is required because it isn't proof, and conditions can change.
The conditions of the formation of the rock are very different. You are an idiot in search of a fight. And you look to be pushing a particular agenda you know to be stupid, so you don't even want to state or defend it. Just insulting everyone. "Since science isn't perfect, nothing it says can be trusted" What a Luddite.
The cost of the engine replacement was close enough to the value of the ar that it was better to sell for scrap than repair and sell for market price.