It seems like these days everybody wants to be a search engine, everybody wants to offer a music download service. Now is everyone going to offer thier own browers?
Sour grapes because you don't have your own search engine, music download service, and browser?;)
Don't forget to launch your own IM while you're at it!:)
And I thought for sure that Dell would have been the one to buy up MusicMatch.
Oh well, as long as Yahoo can keep up the high quality that I've become accustomed to with MM, I'll be happy--not likely given their history though:(
Insurance companies will love this. You go to the doc for a physical and in addition to everything else, the nurse scans you. The doc comes into the little room (eventually) shaking her head and disciplines you for not following your diet.
Of course, this gets reported to your insurance co and your rates go up:)
The actual product/license line is probably somewhat blurry for a photographer/client. Because, in addition to the actual photographic print and the right to copy (product and license respectively) there is, especially when talking about film photographers, always the original (negative)
So, I believe that unless the photog sells the negative, she always retains the right of reproduction. Therefore she could always sell the 'product' again (with the consumption of a few chemicals & some paper of course). But, in my limited experience, no two prints are ever the same--well, at least not if you're enlarging them yourself.
Slashdot Mirror
people who illegally perform plays and musical pieces go to jail
:)
Great! So my buddy who can't carry a tune but insists on singing... I can finally have put away?
It seems like these days everybody wants to be a search engine, everybody wants to offer a music download service. Now is everyone going to offer thier own browers?
;)
:)
Sour grapes because you don't have your own search engine, music download service, and browser?
Don't forget to launch your own IM while you're at it!
And I thought for sure that Dell would have been the one to buy up MusicMatch. Oh well, as long as Yahoo can keep up the high quality that I've become accustomed to with MM, I'll be happy--not likely given their history though :(
Insurance companies will love this. You go to the doc for a physical and in addition to everything else, the nurse scans you. The doc comes into the little room (eventually) shaking her head and disciplines you for not following your diet. Of course, this gets reported to your insurance co and your rates go up :)
Neither is MS. Hate them though we will, as long as they have competition, they cannot, by definition, have a monopoly.
But are baby powder & baby oil made from babies?
The actual product/license line is probably somewhat blurry for a photographer/client. Because, in addition to the actual photographic print and the right to copy (product and license respectively) there is, especially when talking about film photographers, always the original (negative) So, I believe that unless the photog sells the negative, she always retains the right of reproduction. Therefore she could always sell the 'product' again (with the consumption of a few chemicals & some paper of course). But, in my limited experience, no two prints are ever the same--well, at least not if you're enlarging them yourself.