Wow. Are going to cry or something? I asked for links and i got them. What do I need to say to stop you from crying?
BTW, you might want to understand what [sic] actually means and how tto use it before making yourself look even dumber than sumdumass. Now recess is almost over so go ask your teacher about that.
In the early 1900s, racism in the context of Hitler was the crown jewel of the left. Eugenics was a leading scientific theory and led to horrible things around the world including forced sterilization in the US. But the essence of the scientific theory was that different classes or races of people were superior and inferior to each other much like specimens in the barn yard (breeds of cattle for instance ). Hitler took it a bit further under the guise of compassion where he allowed the handicapped to be euthanized (even without their consent ) in the T4 program which was a precursor to the final solution.
It is quite interesting how there are so many similarities of Hitler and the left's stances on many things yet you would be led to believe he was a political right. I mean he had the compassion thing down. Valued science over religion, made university free and encouraged participating. He even removed churches and god from public view after using it to his advantage. It's almost as if history was ignored to push a narrative.
I haven't. There is simply no time between sex, drugs, and rock and roll once you try to mix work into it and make sure your wife doesn't find out.
So please post a couple links that you feel provides the examples necessary to support such a claim. I hope your best example is not a black person punching someone dressed like the KKK. I wouldn't consider that extreme. Prudent and proper would be more realistic.
Try camping in the winter. Just throw a couple horse blankets over the top of your tent and a lantern will keep it warm enough. I do this during deer gun season in Ohio (USA) which is at the end of November for the first week, end of December for the second week, and the beginning of January for the muzzle loaders days. I always save a day or two for just watching birds that didn't fly south for whatever reason and whatever other wildlife i can find active. A couple sets of good binoculars of different power levels helps. Trees and most foliage won't have leaves so you can see pretty far even in the woods.
It's a marketing gimmick to sell things like the moon landings and the space race was- Tang, wd40, pens that write upside down, computers, duck tape and all that.
Even though several of those existed before the space race and moon landings, you should ignore it all and run with it. Our reality can be whatever we want it to be as long as you believe hard enough.
Is your disability not having a Facebook account? Otherwise I don't see how you could sue. That is unless you think claiming disability entitles you to everything. I'm not sure it does though.
Seriously. If they were not authorized, it certainly does not seem that they let them do it. Perhaps it was just a lower level employee who thinks they were helping or if it was something they were pondering and decided against but an employee took the initiative to get it done.
You really don't know what happened. More so, we really don't know if the retraction is true or not. Let's take a breath and see what is really happening before we end up getting the hosting service suspended because someone has a Amazon store and some idiot author thinks he is pirating her work.
Sort of but wrong. The court is wrong to because of the neccesity of this data in connection to facilitating calls. It is the same reasons why the supreme court has already ruled they need a warrant for a pen register, trap and trace and US law has required it since 1968. It is trivial to get a warrant for this though. It also provides penalties for disclosure of this information outside of a lawful intercept or to one of the parties of the call. But the principle is the same because the GPS information is a necessity of providing the service and accurate billing which is also required by law.
It is like saying all grocery residents have to use the city trash service then claiming it was already disclosed so no warrant needed tosort through your waste for determining insurance rates based on health foods or if other people are living in a home where someone receives public assistance. It is essentially a ploy to get around constitutional limitations on government.
Smart people say and do stupid things all the time. Should we assume those stupid things are not stupid or something? Or should we just acknowledge that some people are not the smartest at everything and that they can be wrong on some things.
Your facts are wrong. The laws were followed including the time limits to certify the results of the election. Florida certainly did send legitimate electors.
Oh, and international law only applies to a country if that country accepts it's application by treaty or if it is imposed by subjugation of their sovereignty. So if you want to cite international law, you must show where we are subject to it. But the supreme court case specifically dealt with this already and said you could not change the rules mid process which is why they could not recount the votes enough for Gore to win in the allotted time span.
I want to see the specific text that says you are not supposed to charge over 80 percent. I've been searching without luck, and I suppose since you are the one with the know how about Teslas, You will have that cite.
I'm not sure why you cannot follow a thread but here you go Oh, I did not make the claim and I did not say if it was correct or not, all I did was interpret plain English into something more descriptive for those who could not get it and tried to do a false equivalence.
I did however find that Tesla recommends that you keep them plugged in whenever you aren't driving. Makes sense. Apparently the Tesla knows that you are taking a trip the next day, so charges it to 100 percent, and also knows if you aren't. I wonder if it purposely drains the bttery down to 80 percent if it was qt 100.
It's all magic anyways.. Well until the magic smoke escapes. BTW, about the guy who originally posted the 80%, I have known him to be wrong on opinions a bit but rarely wrong on facts. Perhaps you should ask him about this.
And why does that excite you so much that you have to strike up a conversation with me?
This is really weird. Here we have a story and surveillance because sickos are killing people and you are concerned about my penis and what reminds you of a penis.
Oh well. I guess everyone has their thing. I got mine too. I always say that the only thing more beautiful than a naked woman is a naked woman with a gun.
So you are obsessed with some other guy's penis size because you are jealous that they have dealt with it differently than you approve?
Why don't you just jump in and tell them it is already big enough and you are satisfied with the size so you are mad they are in your view compensating for.
Btw, you don't know shit when it comes to owning a gun. People own them for all sorts of reasons and my favorite is because they can. That is all the reasoning you need to be concerned with. So why don't you just ignore my penis and worry about other things.
Why is it that all gun grabbing liberals eventually express concern about someone's penis size when they realize their arguments fail? Is that the real agenda or something? Is it an issue where you feel you cannot address it while they have what you think is compensating for their size?
What is wrong with deporting people? It is not like they have any right to be here and they are breaking the law to boot. Would you prefer they are incarcerated for several years first and then allowed to apply to be legally here?
Anyways, that is neither here nor there. The shootings aren't likely being done by most of the illegals. It is more likely either gang related or some perverted individuals trying their hand at terrorism. Most terrorist in the U.S. arrived legally either by birth or the legal immigration process. Some overstayed their welcome but I'm not positive to the numbers.
No, what he is saying is that checking the fuel gage when fueling to stop from over fueling the vehicle and having to be concerned with running a certain amount of fuel out before refueling instead of topping the tank of whenever it is convenient is the showstopper.
It would be for me too. I am not going to delay a trip or do extra driving because i have a 40% charge and will need 70% for my activities the next day. I'm also not going to own a car that will degrade if I ignore that and just give it a full charge.
If you have the lifestyle that has that ability or the money to throw around, an electric car is for you. If not, it seems a bit like dropping a bowling ball on your feet before shopping for shoes then dealing with the feet pain from ill fitting shoes until you decide to get another pair.
Every nut, bolt and ball bearing is a separate part.
I would agree with that. One point of failure in any of the components that create the unit is a pathway for the unit failure. But realistically it is more obvious than that. Use a grade 5 nut with a grade 8 bolt and you just lost the benefits of the higher strength grade bolt. Use a bad diode in an alternator and it will not charge the batteries.
Electric will be more reliable for other reasons than the number of parts too. It is the same reasons that turbine engines are more reliable. The number of friction points in the process of generating power is reduced. Piston rings aren't sliding along the cylinder walls, you don't have connecting rods or their bearings or the constant changes in force with the operation of them. In an electric motor, you have the benefits of heat management where you aren't burning chemicals and experiencing explosive forces.
Some people care more about appearances than common sense. One doesn't necessarily confer the other. It could be a work vehicle and they do not own it. It could be that they used the kids private school tuition fees to be able to afford it (through the magic of loans and having to pay it back ). It could also be that they are more concerned about their their friends or someone else views about public education or hold them themselves.
Or, they could simply own a car dealership and drive the stuff they are selling around. We had a kid in high school who drove a different car to school ever day of the week. His dad owned a dealership and thought it helped sell cars to have his inventory out in the public eyes. Or so the claim was. We just think he was avoiding purchasing the kid a car or the insurance and taxes so he let him pick from the lot and used the dealership insurance and tags which was already being paid. But the kid was scared to death of damaging the cars and was a lot more careful than the rest of us seemed to be (in hindsight ).
No, i don't have any of that on my phone. I do have play services installed and do not know how to uninstall it. My GPS is disabled, i have set Google services to not use it. And don't surf with chrome. (I use dolphin primarily )
Now the phone does try to pin a location down by IP address. But my provider uses a proxy and if i don't search for something specific by city state, it will suggest towns 3 or more states away.
I'm by no means 100% effective at stopping them from getting or using my location but i do as much as I can to prevent it.
You make it sound like Gawker was completely innocent and eventually won everything they were sued over. If a lawsuit doesn't have merit, it will be tossed out. There not only needs to be a reason why you are sued, that reason needs to be supported by some basis of law.
If you really are worried about some guy with a lot of money supporting other people lawsuits, don't give a valid reason to be sued.
Meanwhile, back in real America, if you are in the right real people will sue for you.
Most lawyers will take a clear cut case on contingency. That means they pay until you win, deduct expenses, then grab a percentage of the judgment. There are also lawyers who will do work pro bono which means they flip the bill and don't expect compensation but for some reason feel the case is necessary. You also have lots of charities that enable both as well as some that will just pay the lawyer bill. So it certainly is not limited to what you can afford.
This is only possible because someone had a claim. A claim that has survived court challenges too i might add. I think that should matter a hell of a lot more than who funds someone in their fight to become whole again.
Let's try looking at this from a different angle. What if there was a bank robbery and when the robber started shooting people, a skinhead takes the gun from the robber and in the process the robber gets shot. Do we ignore all that lead up to the robber getting shot and support frying the racist skinhead in the electric chair because we don't like racists? Or do we hold our noses and say thank you for saving lives?
Regardless of the motivation or who funds it, there was a valid claim and the person bringing it deserved to make the case.
Slashdot Mirror
I seem to remember it being intensive porpoises not purposes. Perhaps he rambled it from memory.
Wow. Are going to cry or something? I asked for links and i got them. What do I need to say to stop you from crying?
BTW, you might want to understand what [sic] actually means and how tto use it before making yourself look even dumber than sumdumass. Now recess is almost over so go ask your teacher about that.
In the early 1900s, racism in the context of Hitler was the crown jewel of the left. Eugenics was a leading scientific theory and led to horrible things around the world including forced sterilization in the US. But the essence of the scientific theory was that different classes or races of people were superior and inferior to each other much like specimens in the barn yard (breeds of cattle for instance ). Hitler took it a bit further under the guise of compassion where he allowed the handicapped to be euthanized (even without their consent ) in the T4 program which was a precursor to the final solution.
It is quite interesting how there are so many similarities of Hitler and the left's stances on many things yet you would be led to believe he was a political right. I mean he had the compassion thing down. Valued science over religion, made university free and encouraged participating. He even removed churches and god from public view after using it to his advantage. It's almost as if history was ignored to push a narrative.
I haven't. There is simply no time between sex, drugs, and rock and roll once you try to mix work into it and make sure your wife doesn't find out.
So please post a couple links that you feel provides the examples necessary to support such a claim. I hope your best example is not a black person punching someone dressed like the KKK. I wouldn't consider that extreme. Prudent and proper would be more realistic.
That or they will just jam a gas generator on a trailer or in the luggage rack of the electric car or something.
Something like this
http://autoweek.com/article/ca...
Try camping in the winter. Just throw a couple horse blankets over the top of your tent and a lantern will keep it warm enough. I do this during deer gun season in Ohio (USA) which is at the end of November for the first week, end of December for the second week, and the beginning of January for the muzzle loaders days. I always save a day or two for just watching birds that didn't fly south for whatever reason and whatever other wildlife i can find active. A couple sets of good binoculars of different power levels helps. Trees and most foliage won't have leaves so you can see pretty far even in the woods.
It's a marketing gimmick to sell things like the moon landings and the space race was- Tang, wd40, pens that write upside down, computers, duck tape and all that.
Even though several of those existed before the space race and moon landings, you should ignore it all and run with it. Our reality can be whatever we want it to be as long as you believe hard enough.
Is your disability not having a Facebook account? Otherwise I don't see how you could sue. That is unless you think claiming disability entitles you to everything. I'm not sure it does though.
Who says anyone let anyone do anything?
Seriously. If they were not authorized, it certainly does not seem that they let them do it. Perhaps it was just a lower level employee who thinks they were helping or if it was something they were pondering and decided against but an employee took the initiative to get it done.
You really don't know what happened. More so, we really don't know if the retraction is true or not. Let's take a breath and see what is really happening before we end up getting the hosting service suspended because someone has a Amazon store and some idiot author thinks he is pirating her work.
Sort of but wrong. The court is wrong to because of the neccesity of this data in connection to facilitating calls. It is the same reasons why the supreme court has already ruled they need a warrant for a pen register, trap and trace and US law has required it since 1968. It is trivial to get a warrant for this though. It also provides penalties for disclosure of this information outside of a lawful intercept or to one of the parties of the call. But the principle is the same because the GPS information is a necessity of providing the service and accurate billing which is also required by law.
It is like saying all grocery residents have to use the city trash service then claiming it was already disclosed so no warrant needed tosort through your waste for determining insurance rates based on health foods or if other people are living in a home where someone receives public assistance. It is essentially a ploy to get around constitutional limitations on government.
Smart people say and do stupid things all the time. Should we assume those stupid things are not stupid or something? Or should we just acknowledge that some people are not the smartest at everything and that they can be wrong on some things.
Your facts are wrong. The laws were followed including the time limits to certify the results of the election. Florida certainly did send legitimate electors.
Oh, and international law only applies to a country if that country accepts it's application by treaty or if it is imposed by subjugation of their sovereignty. So if you want to cite international law, you must show where we are subject to it. But the supreme court case specifically dealt with this already and said you could not change the rules mid process which is why they could not recount the votes enough for Gore to win in the allotted time span.
I'm not sure why you cannot follow a thread but here you go Oh, I did not make the claim and I did not say if it was correct or not, all I did was interpret plain English into something more descriptive for those who could not get it and tried to do a false equivalence.
It's all magic anyways.. Well until the magic smoke escapes. BTW, about the guy who originally posted the 80%, I have known him to be wrong on opinions a bit but rarely wrong on facts. Perhaps you should ask him about this.
And why does that excite you so much that you have to strike up a conversation with me?
This is really weird. Here we have a story and surveillance because sickos are killing people and you are concerned about my penis and what reminds you of a penis.
Oh well. I guess everyone has their thing. I got mine too. I always say that the only thing more beautiful than a naked woman is a naked woman with a gun.
So you are obsessed with some other guy's penis size because you are jealous that they have dealt with it differently than you approve?
Why don't you just jump in and tell them it is already big enough and you are satisfied with the size so you are mad they are in your view compensating for.
Btw, you don't know shit when it comes to owning a gun. People own them for all sorts of reasons and my favorite is because they can. That is all the reasoning you need to be concerned with. So why don't you just ignore my penis and worry about other things.
Why is it that all gun grabbing liberals eventually express concern about someone's penis size when they realize their arguments fail? Is that the real agenda or something? Is it an issue where you feel you cannot address it while they have what you think is compensating for their size?
What is wrong with deporting people? It is not like they have any right to be here and they are breaking the law to boot. Would you prefer they are incarcerated for several years first and then allowed to apply to be legally here?
Anyways, that is neither here nor there. The shootings aren't likely being done by most of the illegals. It is more likely either gang related or some perverted individuals trying their hand at terrorism. Most terrorist in the U.S. arrived legally either by birth or the legal immigration process. Some overstayed their welcome but I'm not positive to the numbers.
No, what he is saying is that checking the fuel gage when fueling to stop from over fueling the vehicle and having to be concerned with running a certain amount of fuel out before refueling instead of topping the tank of whenever it is convenient is the showstopper.
It would be for me too. I am not going to delay a trip or do extra driving because i have a 40% charge and will need 70% for my activities the next day. I'm also not going to own a car that will degrade if I ignore that and just give it a full charge.
If you have the lifestyle that has that ability or the money to throw around, an electric car is for you. If not, it seems a bit like dropping a bowling ball on your feet before shopping for shoes then dealing with the feet pain from ill fitting shoes until you decide to get another pair.
Every nut, bolt and ball bearing is a separate part.
I would agree with that. One point of failure in any of the components that create the unit is a pathway for the unit failure. But realistically it is more obvious than that. Use a grade 5 nut with a grade 8 bolt and you just lost the benefits of the higher strength grade bolt. Use a bad diode in an alternator and it will not charge the batteries.
Electric will be more reliable for other reasons than the number of parts too. It is the same reasons that turbine engines are more reliable. The number of friction points in the process of generating power is reduced. Piston rings aren't sliding along the cylinder walls, you don't have connecting rods or their bearings or the constant changes in force with the operation of them. In an electric motor, you have the benefits of heat management where you aren't burning chemicals and experiencing explosive forces.
Some people care more about appearances than common sense. One doesn't necessarily confer the other. It could be a work vehicle and they do not own it. It could be that they used the kids private school tuition fees to be able to afford it (through the magic of loans and having to pay it back ). It could also be that they are more concerned about their their friends or someone else views about public education or hold them themselves.
Or, they could simply own a car dealership and drive the stuff they are selling around. We had a kid in high school who drove a different car to school ever day of the week. His dad owned a dealership and thought it helped sell cars to have his inventory out in the public eyes. Or so the claim was. We just think he was avoiding purchasing the kid a car or the insurance and taxes so he let him pick from the lot and used the dealership insurance and tags which was already being paid. But the kid was scared to death of damaging the cars and was a lot more careful than the rest of us seemed to be (in hindsight ).
So much for that solar powered hybrid electric car you just purchased to save the environment and cut fuel costs.
No, i don't have any of that on my phone. I do have play services installed and do not know how to uninstall it. My GPS is disabled, i have set Google services to not use it. And don't surf with chrome. (I use dolphin primarily )
Now the phone does try to pin a location down by IP address. But my provider uses a proxy and if i don't search for something specific by city state, it will suggest towns 3 or more states away.
I'm by no means 100% effective at stopping them from getting or using my location but i do as much as I can to prevent it.
You make it sound like Gawker was completely innocent and eventually won everything they were sued over. If a lawsuit doesn't have merit, it will be tossed out. There not only needs to be a reason why you are sued, that reason needs to be supported by some basis of law.
If you really are worried about some guy with a lot of money supporting other people lawsuits, don't give a valid reason to be sued.
Meanwhile, back in real America, if you are in the right real people will sue for you.
Most lawyers will take a clear cut case on contingency. That means they pay until you win, deduct expenses, then grab a percentage of the judgment. There are also lawyers who will do work pro bono which means they flip the bill and don't expect compensation but for some reason feel the case is necessary. You also have lots of charities that enable both as well as some that will just pay the lawyer bill. So it certainly is not limited to what you can afford.
This is only possible because someone had a claim. A claim that has survived court challenges too i might add. I think that should matter a hell of a lot more than who funds someone in their fight to become whole again.
Let's try looking at this from a different angle. What if there was a bank robbery and when the robber started shooting people, a skinhead takes the gun from the robber and in the process the robber gets shot. Do we ignore all that lead up to the robber getting shot and support frying the racist skinhead in the electric chair because we don't like racists? Or do we hold our noses and say thank you for saving lives?
Regardless of the motivation or who funds it, there was a valid claim and the person bringing it deserved to make the case.