I sure am glad you pointed out that this is happening today and always has happened in the entire history of Christianity. Otherwise people might think that people in power used Christianity to otherwise enact their evil agenda in the way that the road to hell is paved with good intentions (or they were just sadistic tyrants who enjoyed watching people die)...
BTW, can you refresh me on the passages in the new testament that say to go fourth and kill? I lost my list decades ago and have been burned at the stake 3 times now so finding it will be unlikely.
As they say, your freedom ends where it infringes on someone else's. That's what noise, pollution, and safety ordinances are for.
Isn't your infringement of my freedom the same? I mean if I am not free to do something because it annoys you, aren't you infringing on my freedom? Sounds like a problem in your logic as you would not have the freedom to stop me from being free.
And if they are using leaf blowers 5 days a week, they are doing something wrong. It might be your anally retentive codes and desires to keep everything looking pristine so your home values stay up causing extra work. I would suggest you deserve the problems if that is the case.
Damning evidence of what? That I was writing a book and something in real life happened that looks strikingly similar?
Here is the problem. If you can think of it, I can think of it. We may be motivated to think of it differently like I may be intending to write the plot line of a book or movie and you may be interested in taking everyone's freedom away.
Now I have seen all sorts of things like tools modified for specific tasks that someone has been using for years and find out later that some company noticed the same concept and is actually marketing the same thing. In high school, there were several literature projects we had to do where we created fictional stories around specific real life events and give presentations on them. Several of the presentations were near identical to rough drafts I had made and after chatting with people, we all had thought of the same basic things but chose to go in different directions for whatever reason. I mean there are more then one ways to skin a cat but in the end, anyone trying to skin a cat will either fail or pick one of the methods that work.
How about you and the rest of the world doing whatever you want and leave me to be free to do what I want?
Is it really too much to ask that i keep my freedom even if it somehow bothers you one or two days of the year? I mean the alternative isn't going to be as rosy as you think when your freedom annoys someone else at some point in time. Hell, just look at drones or the state of children walking to school.
I don't care about women or men in the context of my statement. Actually, i didn't even bother denoting any sex in my statement because i do not think this behavior is limited to any one sex.
So why don't you roll of your sister long enough to get a clue and understand what you are replying to.
If the please vote for us government isn't worried about openly spying on citizens i doubt a couple companies threatening to pull out would scare them. The issue can be spun as they are enabling the bad guys and support them which is obvious by not letting government monitor and catch them.
But it won't come to that. The market is just to big and profitable for the companies to abandon so outside of making noise, it won't come to it. Just like with China and the government knows this.
Some people are irrational with their greed and overly confident with their intelligence.
Usually they become lawyers or politicians or investment bankers but I suppose a few low end software developers could be the same. It's not like people haven't thrown away good careers or their families for gambling or drug usage and so on. It's not uncommon to see people who are married for 20+ years throw it all away at retirement age because they took a chance on cheating and now have to divide up a life time of assets, retirement funds and so on and end up with slaving at a job in their golden years.
NAh.. The only thing that matters to some people is the gross sales figure which means they are rich and can afford it. Anything like costs or labor or raw material stock and so on are accounting tricks to avoid paying their fair share in taxes.
Please stop polluting this discussion with facts and reality.
They probably saw the sweet deal Iran got and are posturing for something similar. Ever since the 94 deal which they pretty much ignored, they sort of have a habit of rattling sabers a bit to threaten world peace and then wait for offers to settle down.
Nah. The government wouldn't blink at all. They didn't in China. BlackBerry got a government to blink though. But none of them pulled out of China and even have a history of sticking around like with the right to be forgotten crap.
The UK is just to big of a market for them to drop.
Omg.. are you serious? Do you really think someone with a concealed carry permit has to have the weapon 24/7. Ffs, get real. At least actually read what was said before projecting your irrational fears. Do you need "at their leisure " definedor something?
And no. There will not be accidental he looked brown shootings. No state with CC laws allow that in the first place. Why don't you actually look into the shit before respouting stupid nonsense that you likely weren't even original enough to imagine yourself.
The tor routing has no clue to what or the size of the payload your browser requests. It will route anything sent in response to you connecting to my server. You can in fact run applications over TOR and if you can do that with ease you can also run network tools in response to connections to a server.
The browser generally has no firewalling to stop this.
The warrant process is not a prosecution. It is a check on LEO in gathering evidence that they could not legally or constitutionally otherwise have done. The prosecution will only start after evidence of a crime is collected.
What you are missing is that they are supposed to inform the judge that there is reason to believe baby-shaking, dog-kicking, drug-dealing, devil-worshiping, child-molesting, panty-sniffing terrorist psychopathic monster is or has participated in a specific crime.
Sort of. A JavaScript-enabled exploit need not be present in some or most cases though. TOR is essentially a tunnel into your network to the destination computer. Its sort of like you had no router to proxy or masq your private ip. Using information from the tcp packet which is necessary to send results from a page view back, you can use simple network tool like angry ip scanner and Xprobe2 almost as if you were on the network.
You can use different tools to discover the mac address and fingerprint the OS. Once this is done, at least for Windows systems (especially if Windows networking is enabled ) you can find information about the user logged in and so on. I would suggest that almost everything they discovered could likely be found without installing any software remotely. But if they needed to install something along the same lines as the tools, you could use PsExec or similar. Actually, you could do all your fingerprinting with that tool provided you have a little information about the computer (which you might get from a website registration process ) . You can also use PsExec to download a copy of the registry and security SAMs (my mind is drawing a blank at the moment but the same process to recover or change Windows passwords )
The one wrench in this would be if they had a firewall enabled on the computer using the TOR connection. It would block scanning and some will gladly alert the user with annoying pop-up notifications. The FBI might have a program that wraps a bunch of these tools up and automates their usr.
Try reading up in the thread and you will see the context.
And you are right. Your point is lost on me because i was arguing something more specific than you apparently saw. Might have something to do with the moderation system and your settings. But I was speaking of a specific situation.
Listen idiot. I have been in a situation or two where i was almost killed. I have seen others die in front of me. I do have some insight to this but i did preface the comment with they might and that i can only guess. I did not put thoughts into anyone 's mind and stated what i thought they "might " be thinking.
Do you think they welcomed being killed or something?
For the most part - just knowing someone will shoot back is enough to deter shootings. If only 10% of the law abiding population of legal age carried a concealed weapon at their leisure not only would most gun crimes likely not happen but a good majority of them would be stopped before they became mass shootings.
How many mass shootings have taken place inside a police department? What is so magical about the police other than they have guns?
Who is arguing for unregulated gun ownership? Do you normally invent strawmen just to shoot down? Does that somehow allow you to justify your beliefs?
The only thing i argued is how stupid it is to have a weapon that kills unauthorized users and that people being assassinated likely wished they had a means to stop it.
The majority of those US deaths are suicide. But even if you want to count them you are purposely ignoring the fact that gun deaths still occur even when there are laws making guns hard to get. But you are also ignoring the entire points made in order to spout something. Having a gun that would kill you if you needed to use it is a extremely stupid idea and can be the cause of your death either by attempted action or inaction. It would resign you to death with absolutely no chance of changing that unless someone with a gun shows up first
Yeah. . To bad there weren't any adults around all those first graders either. You know, someone should make a law about that. Maybe something like a teacher or maybe a principle or dean. You know, like they treat older kids in high school or college.
You mean like a law that wasn't enforced? Like the navy yard and Georgia tech shooters who were diagnosed with mental illnesses but no one reported it so they could go ahead and purchase guns? Or the Newtown guy who killed his mother and stole her guns? Or the staw puchase for Santa Barbara? All of which is and was illegal.
But i see you limited your comments to in America. Is that because it was already hard to get the gun in both of France's terrorist attacks, Denmark, the Philippines, China and the many other places in 2015 alone?
You do realize guns can be made relatively easily right? Look at what Israel did with the Uzi. Right now it is far easier to just buy them. But the cat is already out of the bag.
Slashdot Mirror
I sure am glad you pointed out that this is happening today and always has happened in the entire history of Christianity. Otherwise people might think that people in power used Christianity to otherwise enact their evil agenda in the way that the road to hell is paved with good intentions (or they were just sadistic tyrants who enjoyed watching people die)...
BTW, can you refresh me on the passages in the new testament that say to go fourth and kill? I lost my list decades ago and have been burned at the stake 3 times now so finding it will be unlikely.
Isn't your infringement of my freedom the same? I mean if I am not free to do something because it annoys you, aren't you infringing on my freedom? Sounds like a problem in your logic as you would not have the freedom to stop me from being free.
And if they are using leaf blowers 5 days a week, they are doing something wrong. It might be your anally retentive codes and desires to keep everything looking pristine so your home values stay up causing extra work. I would suggest you deserve the problems if that is the case.
Damning evidence of what? That I was writing a book and something in real life happened that looks strikingly similar?
Here is the problem. If you can think of it, I can think of it. We may be motivated to think of it differently like I may be intending to write the plot line of a book or movie and you may be interested in taking everyone's freedom away.
Now I have seen all sorts of things like tools modified for specific tasks that someone has been using for years and find out later that some company noticed the same concept and is actually marketing the same thing. In high school, there were several literature projects we had to do where we created fictional stories around specific real life events and give presentations on them. Several of the presentations were near identical to rough drafts I had made and after chatting with people, we all had thought of the same basic things but chose to go in different directions for whatever reason. I mean there are more then one ways to skin a cat but in the end, anyone trying to skin a cat will either fail or pick one of the methods that work.
How about you and the rest of the world doing whatever you want and leave me to be free to do what I want?
Is it really too much to ask that i keep my freedom even if it somehow bothers you one or two days of the year? I mean the alternative isn't going to be as rosy as you think when your freedom annoys someone else at some point in time. Hell, just look at drones or the state of children walking to school.
I initially read that as thespian free. Oh well.
Hi complete and total idiot.
I don't care about women or men in the context of my statement. Actually, i didn't even bother denoting any sex in my statement because i do not think this behavior is limited to any one sex.
So why don't you roll of your sister long enough to get a clue and understand what you are replying to.
Front row seat? Hell. It wasn't that long ago that it got you an overnight stay in the Lincoln bedroom.
If the please vote for us government isn't worried about openly spying on citizens i doubt a couple companies threatening to pull out would scare them. The issue can be spun as they are enabling the bad guys and support them which is obvious by not letting government monitor and catch them.
But it won't come to that. The market is just to big and profitable for the companies to abandon so outside of making noise, it won't come to it. Just like with China and the government knows this.
Some people are irrational with their greed and overly confident with their intelligence.
Usually they become lawyers or politicians or investment bankers but I suppose a few low end software developers could be the same. It's not like people haven't thrown away good careers or their families for gambling or drug usage and so on. It's not uncommon to see people who are married for 20+ years throw it all away at retirement age because they took a chance on cheating and now have to divide up a life time of assets, retirement funds and so on and end up with slaving at a job in their golden years.
NAh.. The only thing that matters to some people is the gross sales figure which means they are rich and can afford it. Anything like costs or labor or raw material stock and so on are accounting tricks to avoid paying their fair share in taxes.
Please stop polluting this discussion with facts and reality.
They probably saw the sweet deal Iran got and are posturing for something similar. Ever since the 94 deal which they pretty much ignored, they sort of have a habit of rattling sabers a bit to threaten world peace and then wait for offers to settle down.
Hmm.. global warming - nuclear winter. .. are you thinking what I am thinking?
Well if you are, I'm sure discussing whether kids would want them if they call them unhappy meals is sure to be off topic.
Nah. The government wouldn't blink at all. They didn't in China. BlackBerry got a government to blink though. But none of them pulled out of China and even have a history of sticking around like with the right to be forgotten crap.
The UK is just to big of a market for them to drop.
Omg.. are you serious? Do you really think someone with a concealed carry permit has to have the weapon 24/7. Ffs, get real. At least actually read what was said before projecting your irrational fears. Do you need "at their leisure " definedor something?
And no. There will not be accidental he looked brown shootings. No state with CC laws allow that in the first place. Why don't you actually look into the shit before respouting stupid nonsense that you likely weren't even original enough to imagine yourself.
How naive you are.
The tor routing has no clue to what or the size of the payload your browser requests. It will route anything sent in response to you connecting to my server. You can in fact run applications over TOR and if you can do that with ease you can also run network tools in response to connections to a server.
The browser generally has no firewalling to stop this.
The warrant process is not a prosecution. It is a check on LEO in gathering evidence that they could not legally or constitutionally otherwise have done. The prosecution will only start after evidence of a crime is collected.
What you are missing is that they are supposed to inform the judge that there is reason to believe baby-shaking, dog-kicking, drug-dealing, devil-worshiping, child-molesting, panty-sniffing terrorist psychopathic monster is or has participated in a specific crime.
Sort of. A JavaScript-enabled exploit need not be present in some or most cases though. TOR is essentially a tunnel into your network to the destination computer. Its sort of like you had no router to proxy or masq your private ip. Using information from the tcp packet which is necessary to send results from a page view back, you can use simple network tool like angry ip scanner and Xprobe2 almost as if you were on the network.
You can use different tools to discover the mac address and fingerprint the OS. Once this is done, at least for Windows systems (especially if Windows networking is enabled ) you can find information about the user logged in and so on. I would suggest that almost everything they discovered could likely be found without installing any software remotely. But if they needed to install something along the same lines as the tools, you could use PsExec or similar. Actually, you could do all your fingerprinting with that tool provided you have a little information about the computer (which you might get from a website registration process ) . You can also use PsExec to download a copy of the registry and security SAMs (my mind is drawing a blank at the moment but the same process to recover or change Windows passwords )
The one wrench in this would be if they had a firewall enabled on the computer using the TOR connection. It would block scanning and some will gladly alert the user with annoying pop-up notifications. The FBI might have a program that wraps a bunch of these tools up and automates their usr.
Try reading up in the thread and you will see the context.
And you are right. Your point is lost on me because i was arguing something more specific than you apparently saw. Might have something to do with the moderation system and your settings. But I was speaking of a specific situation.
Listen idiot. I have been in a situation or two where i was almost killed. I have seen others die in front of me. I do have some insight to this but i did preface the comment with they might and that i can only guess. I did not put thoughts into anyone 's mind and stated what i thought they "might " be thinking.
Do you think they welcomed being killed or something?
Why?
For the most part - just knowing someone will shoot back is enough to deter shootings. If only 10% of the law abiding population of legal age carried a concealed weapon at their leisure not only would most gun crimes likely not happen but a good majority of them would be stopped before they became mass shootings.
How many mass shootings have taken place inside a police department? What is so magical about the police other than they have guns?
Who is arguing for unregulated gun ownership? Do you normally invent strawmen just to shoot down? Does that somehow allow you to justify your beliefs?
The only thing i argued is how stupid it is to have a weapon that kills unauthorized users and that people being assassinated likely wished they had a means to stop it.
What is your point?
The majority of those US deaths are suicide. But even if you want to count them you are purposely ignoring the fact that gun deaths still occur even when there are laws making guns hard to get. But you are also ignoring the entire points made in order to spout something. Having a gun that would kill you if you needed to use it is a extremely stupid idea and can be the cause of your death either by attempted action or inaction. It would resign you to death with absolutely no chance of changing that unless someone with a gun shows up first
Yeah. . To bad there weren't any adults around all those first graders either. You know, someone should make a law about that. Maybe something like a teacher or maybe a principle or dean. You know, like they treat older kids in high school or college.
You mean like a law that wasn't enforced? Like the navy yard and Georgia tech shooters who were diagnosed with mental illnesses but no one reported it so they could go ahead and purchase guns? Or the Newtown guy who killed his mother and stole her guns? Or the staw puchase for Santa Barbara? All of which is and was illegal.
But i see you limited your comments to in America. Is that because it was already hard to get the gun in both of France's terrorist attacks, Denmark, the Philippines, China and the many other places in 2015 alone?
You do realize guns can be made relatively easily right? Look at what Israel did with the Uzi. Right now it is far easier to just buy them. But the cat is already out of the bag.