Sorry to be a bit pedantic but this could only if the developers are stupid enough to have used one of the rarer virulent strains. Moreover the bacteria would need to be still viable after the explosion (Escherichia coli are not well adapted to surviving extreme temperature and pressures).
Factiod of the day: there are millions (billions?) of E.coli bacteria living in the intestines of each and every one of us right now and doing no harm whatsoever. It is just a few of their bretheren are giving the rest a bad name. In that sense they are a bit like SCO.
Against most of us 'normal' chess players computers have been able to beat us each and every time now for many years. This has certainly not diminished the game in anyway but rather given the oppertunity to have interesting games (usually only if the skill level is turned down!) in the absence of a human opponent.
Even 'chess genius' on my PDA can beat me most times, a far cry from my childhood when a chess computer was large and bulky and could be beaten each and every time, such as by making an obvious move of sacking a piece for positioal advantage.
Slashdot Mirror
Crucially, there's a liquid cooling system to keep all this stuff from melting.
Liquid cooling for computers finally hitting the main-stream!
Quake 4 was previewed on it last night
Previewed? Given its Q4 release date I assume that it will not be available at time of launch (summer in US?)
Sorry to be a bit pedantic but this could only if the developers are stupid enough to have used one of the rarer virulent strains. Moreover the bacteria would need to be still viable after the explosion (Escherichia coli are not well adapted to surviving extreme temperature and pressures).
Factiod of the day: there are millions (billions?) of E.coli bacteria living in the intestines of each and every one of us right now and doing no harm whatsoever. It is just a few of their bretheren are giving the rest a bad name. In that sense they are a bit like SCO.
Against most of us 'normal' chess players computers have been able to beat us each and every time now for many years. This has certainly not diminished the game in anyway but rather given the oppertunity to have interesting games (usually only if the skill level is turned down!) in the absence of a human opponent.
Even 'chess genius' on my PDA can beat me most times, a far cry from my childhood when a chess computer was large and bulky and could be beaten each and every time, such as by making an obvious move of sacking a piece for positioal advantage.
Come to think of it your computer is to complex to have evolved from anything simple. Perhaps you should try and test this theory in a similar manner?