Slashdot Mirror


The Xbox 360 Unveiled

You may or may not have caught the Xbox 360 unveiling on MTV Thursday night, but the internet will provide. A plethora of sites have photos, videos, commentary, specifications, and interviews about the new system. Your fellow readers have pulled together to provide links to: 1up.com, Joystiq, Gamespot, The BBC, CNN, NYT, Gamespy, Team Xbox, Voodoo Extreme, Anandtech, and eToyChest. The official Xbox 360 site opened last night as well for word straight from the source. For more official images Ourcolony.net has been 'solved', and now features an OurColony specific video preview. Finally, for commentary on the event, the Video Game Ombudsman provides an alternative to the press releases. From the post: "Kyle Orland (9:28:42 PM): The future of gaming is a girl in a blue dress? Dan Dormer (9:28:47 PM): The future of gaming is a girl with a bag? Kyle Orland (9:28:57 PM): She's the Xbox! OMG!"

675 comments

  1. Who is drivin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bear is Driving!
    How can that be (first post)?

    1. Re:Who is drivin? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Car full of midgets!!!

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  2. But. by Bananatree3 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Will it run Linux?

    Seriously, I would really love to see Tux scream on this thing!

    1. Re:But. by BeyondALL · · Score: 3, Funny

      But, another interesting question: Will it Run Longhorn? The spec is quite good, and it would be nice to have a full OS for all my multimedia needs..

      --
      "If you keep an open mind people will throw a lot of garbage in it."
    2. Re:But. by astrojetsonjr · · Score: 1
      The hardware specs and comment from Microsoft say it will do about a Teraflop. Not to start the "cluster of these with hot grits" thread, but a few of them at $300 (US) a pop could make a very nice render farm.

      In the past Microsoft has gone out of their way to lock the hardware down, my guess is that they've sunk some effort and brain power into doing that again. I'm sure that there are some modders out there that can get around it, but it might take some time.

      I'm looking at building my own MythTV setup, but in a pound for pound first look (based only on the articles), this may make a good choice. On the other hand it will be interesting to see what Sony counters with.

    3. Re:But. by BeyondALL · · Score: 1

      But, you have to think about this: If I can run Longhorn on a cheap X-box, then my highend PC would be free to run free beer.. hrm, Linux :)

      --
      "If you keep an open mind people will throw a lot of garbage in it."
    4. Re:But. by hostyle · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at building my own MythTV setup, but in a pound for pound first look (based only on the articles), this may make a good choice. On the other hand it will be interesting to see what Sony counters with.

      Do you know of a good USB TV card supported by Linux? No internal expansion slots on this baby.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    5. Re:But. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I thought the average SD reader was supposed to be intelligent?
      Compact Flash readers are smarter :)
    6. Re:But. by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      just a quick look in make xconfig:

      Technotrend/Hauppauge Nova-USB devices (DVB_TTUSB_BUDGET)
      Technotrend/Hauppauge USB DEC devices (DVB_TTUSB_DEC)

      yes, these are dvb devices - there might be more, i only looked quickly and i didn't look at usb analogue cards at all.

      But, the xbox could be used for running mythfrontend, with a big ugly loud box in the attic running the backend (with the card[s] in there)

    7. Re:But. by ssj_195 · · Score: 1

      On a similar note, does anyone known of any good USB WIFI (not Bluetooth) dongles (preferably the "pen"-type of form factor, rather than the great big buggers!) that work under Linux, preferably without ndiswrapper? I'm going to buy a shuttle for my media box, and they only have two PCI slots which will be used up by my TV out and TV in cards, and I'd also like Wireless connectivity. It seems that this is something of a tall order, alas - I was trawling for *hours* yesterday trying to find one that fit all these criteria :(

    8. Re:But. by Fammy2000 · · Score: 0

      Will it Run Longhorn?

      Oh yes, imagine a Longhorn Cluster of these. Thanks Billy G., we love ya!

      --
      If I had something intelligent to say, I would have said it.
    9. Re:But. by gosand · · Score: 1
      Will it Run Longhorn? The spec is quite good, and it would be nice to have a full OS for all my multimedia needs..

      I don't see how the two are connected.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    10. Re:But. by scottme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah. It's only got a 20GB hard drive, which is either a case of cost engineering or someone's idea of a joke.

    11. Re:But. by MKalus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh that would be spiffy, then I could finally run Windows on my PowerMac!!!!!!!

      Just what I am waiting for, this Mac OS X thing just isn't all it is cracked up to be. I am always happy when I can work at XP here at work (although it looks like Mac OS X for some reason).

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    12. Re:But. by infinityxi · · Score: 1

      You can try your luck with Netgear USB Adapter Though I am not sure if there are drivers via Linux.

      --
      Turn based strategy game that runs over XMPP. Phalanx
    13. Re:But. by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that this new graphics card is using the new "unified" shader crap...so yet another new complex thing to hinder open source development on. nVidia's already stated they think it's a dumb idea...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    14. Re:But. by bynary · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, Longhorn (or any Windows OS) was not compatible with RISC processors. Hey, maybe you could run Virtual PC on top of Mac OS X and then run Longhorn. Seriously, Linux will be the first thing to run on this. Down the road we might see OS X running on it, but that's much less likely due to the somewhat proprietary nature of the tri-core processor the 360 has in it.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    15. Re:But. by bynary · · Score: 1

      No no, silly, not if but when it runs Linux.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    16. Re:But. by javiercero · · Score: 1

      Well, Longhorn is based on NT codebase... which was actually developed on RISC machines. Windows 2000 was the last version to run on things other than x86. And well, WindowsCE runs mostly on RISC machines (embedded type processors). So the claim that any Windows OS is not compatible with RISC is a little bit moot.

    17. Re:But. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Seriously, I would really love to see Tux scream on this thing!"

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the GAMING applications that TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE HARDWARE be just a might more interesting than the time it took to compile?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    18. Re:But. by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      You might want to check TiVo's USB WiFi compatibility.

    19. Re:But. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand how to use the word "moot" I'm afraid.

    20. Re:But. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      20 GB is plenty of room for all of your saved games, sound files, etc. With plenty of space left over to cache an entire DVD.

      You'll note that it's too small to store a large quantity of ripped dvd images to play with a mod chip. That's not an accident.

    21. Re:But. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removeable, upgradeable drives.

      The whole point to them is to create another accessory they can sell at top dollar. This is xbox360's version of the overpriced memory card :)

    22. Re:But. by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      sounds like someones idea of an "upgrade"

      want an 80gig drive? i bet itll be something special and youll have to pay out the ass for it

      but thats just a guess

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  3. PowerPC CPU? by skrysakj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe this is why Apple wasn't able to sell machines with a CPU
    faster than 3.0 Ghz. Microsoft had made a deal with IBM to buy them, leaving
    Apple to wait? Can anyone confirm or deny this? How "custom" were these
    CPUs? Were they so custom that they did not effect the supply of G5's to Apple?

    1. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How "custom" were these CPUs?

      The Apple spec G5's have 512k L2 cache. I would assume the Xbox 360 version will probably have half that amount which would make the chips cheaper to produce.

    2. Re:PowerPC CPU? by TummyX · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the article:


      The heart of the system itself is made up of a custom-designed IBM PowerPC-based CPU with 3 symmetrical cores crunching data at 3.2GHz each (for a total of 6 hardware threads) at any one time.

    3. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The presumption is that the XBox CPUs are simpler and not as capable as G5s.

    4. Re:PowerPC CPU? by stilltron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How can MS put this much PowerPC processing power in such a small formfactor? Is MS banking on IBM being able to produce these chips at a smaller nanometer process by the release date (is the xBox360 vaporware?). Is seems like Apple is having problems putting out a machine three times the size with 2/3 the processing power without using a liquid cooling solution. There has to be more to the story.

    5. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft can garuntee that it will buy x amount of these processors for this thing over the course of its life. Apple can garuntee that it can buy y amount of these processors and constantly stop buying as much as they move up to higher and higher specs as time passes. Now the kicker, Microsoft's x is bigger than Apple's y. Much bigger.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    6. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Astatine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would go out on a limb and suggest these PowerPC cores are very different from -- and very stripped-down compared to -- the PowerPC 970 series used in the Mac G5s. They probably closely resemble the general purpose core within the Cell, and are probably in-order execution only. Otherwise the CPU would be too big to make it economical to manufacture: for instance, the dual core AMD64 chips recently announced have >200 million transistors and the cheapest ones are likely to cost about as much each as the launch price of the Xbox360 console, imagine the cost of a chip with three of those cores on it.

      The Xbox360 CPU will probably be very fast performing well-defined number cruching tasks with little branching and logic (e.g. physics processing), but bad at game logic (e.g. AI), compared to current general purpose PPC or AMD64 hardware.

      I expect the Xbox360 will look very nice as a gaming platform to begin with, but will be quickly outstripped by next generation gaming PCs with dual/multi core CPUs (the same game engines that take advantage of the multi core Xbox360 chip will take advantage of these) and dedicated physics processing units. Which, given the extra cost of the PC platform, is exactly as it should be. :)

    7. Re:PowerPC CPU? by martinX · · Score: 0

      The XBox 360 is liquid cooled.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    8. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Astatine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would still be a lot of heat to dissipate from such a small box if the Xbox360's CPU really was equivalent to three G5s as seen in the high end Power Macs. Remember, liquid cooling isn't a "magic wand", connecting a radiator with an 80mm fan (say) to a liquid cooling circuit with the CPU on doesn't give you any benefit if you can attach the same size radiator directly to the CPU, the benefit comes from taking the heat away from the CPU and dissipating it through a much bigger radiator elsewhere (of which there is no sign on the Xbox360 enclosure).

      No, these are stripped-down CPU cores.

    9. Re:PowerPC CPU? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      is it possible to run an openmosix or openmsi cluster over two differen arch's? if so, i might buy one of these and cluster it with my desktop, if somebody gets linux to install on it.

    10. Re:PowerPC CPU? by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think that your prediction about the system being quikcly outstipped by new PC games might be inaccurate. Remember that the great advantage of a console is that it gives developers a single, stable target. They can write engines that utilize its full potential. Even so, it will take some time before anybody puts together AI and physics systems complex enough to really tax this thing.

      PC games on the other hand, have to target a wider audience. It will probably be some time before PC games are designed with a multi-proc/core system in mind

    11. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm suspecting it's probably not 3 distinct cores, but something akin to intels hyperthreading. It's really like 2.5 processors. They've got 2 or 3 logic units and 6 fpu but they share bus lines and address space and have probably some common registers.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    12. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These PowerPC's are not same as a G5. The specs at xbox.com list the total CPU power as being 9 Gflops, this compares to a peak of 12 Gflops for a dual 2.7GHz G5 system.

    13. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Astatine · · Score: 1

      New game engines (e.g. Unreal Engine 3) are already being built with multi core chips for PCs in mind, because the next gen consoles need this and they like to share the codebase. :)

      To mention Unreal Engine 3 again, this engine uses the Novodex physics API which is to be hardware accelerated on PC by the AGEIA PhysX chip. Which looks like being a lot more powerful than the Xbox360's CPU for that particular task. (I've lost the link...)

      Expect games released for Xbox360 *and* PC to perform damn well on a multi-core PC :)

    14. Re:PowerPC CPU? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      I think you've missed my point, which is that multi-core PCs are not yet mainstream. A multi-core console will be mainstream well before the tech is in wide enough use in desktop PCs to be widely leveraed for games.

      Are you telling me that you already have a hardware accelerator for game physics in your PC? If not, when do you plan on getting one? Do you think such a thing will be widespread before the new xbox is?

      Expect games released for Xbox360 *and* PC to perform damn well on a multi-core PC :)

      How will they perform on a normal PC?

    15. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      How will they perform on a normal PC?

      Why does it matter. The other poster is stating that good PCs will outstrip the new consoles in quality in no time, how the minimum requirement performs has no bearing on how the top end scales.

    16. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft can garuntee that it will buy x amount of these processors for this thing over the course of its life.

      So basically Microsoft will keep paying IBM for the exact same chips for years to come

      Apple can garuntee that it can buy y amount of these processors and constantly stop buying as much as they move up to higher and higher specs as time passes

      And Apple will buy these chips for a while, then move on to better, more expensive chips for a while, then move on to better, more expensive chips for a while...

      Microsoft's x is bigger than Apple's y. Much bigger.

      Yeah, I guess if IBM wants to rest on its laurels and just produce the same processors for the next few years, they can.

    17. Re:PowerPC CPU? by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's actually 3 distinct cores, each with two hardware threads (Intel calls this Hyperthreading)...

      It's really like 3 hyperthreaded processors.

      I'm still more curious about the actual chip design tho... They mention it's PowerPC technology, but they don't use words like G4/G5 (apple's terms anyway) or even PPC970 (IBM's name for a G5)

      I am suprised at the 3.2 Ghz rating tho.. Wow.

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    18. Re:PowerPC CPU? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I knew there would be a practical use for this!

      How To Cool Your PC With Dry Ice

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/ 09/0335222&tid=222&tid=137

    19. Re:PowerPC CPU? by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Xbox360 CPU will probably be very fast performing well-defined number cruching tasks with little branching and logic (e.g. physics processing), but bad at game logic (e.g. AI), compared to current general purpose PPC or AMD64 hardware.

      Ah, that explains why the XBox 360 will be shipping with Excel Spreadsheet: The Game.

    20. Re:PowerPC CPU? by aero6dof · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The really funny part is that the XBox PowerPC buy goes to further the research and manufacturing of the core chip technology driving Apple Hardware.

    21. Re:PowerPC CPU? by inkdesign · · Score: 4, Informative
      According to the NYTimes, "The heat generated by all that power will be drawn off by a water-based cooling system, something usually seen only in high-end PC's."

      http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/13/technology/13xbo x.html

      Sounds crazy to me, but there it is...

    22. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I deny this.

    23. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes but the competition for the contract for the next xbox's proc was so steep that they are banking on paying for all that research in the future in the mac market with rediculously overpriced units which we all know apple users are willing to buy. Afterall, the dual G5 does do a gausian blur in photoshop much faster than the G4. Imagine a G6!!111 It will make your images blur so fast you will think you are drinking a zima (after all, we are talking about a mac user).

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    24. Re:PowerPC CPU? by ultramk · · Score: 1

      There's another possible explanation... i.e. they incorporated some fancy switching system like the Powerbooks have in order to reduce power consumption and keep heat down: as CPU demands drop, parts of the chip are shut off, and as demand increases, they're seamlessly brought back on line.

      If this were the case, I imagine that the metal case would act as enough of an extended heat sink that it could run at max CPU for a few minutes at a time before starting to get really hot.

      Either that, or they've gotten as smart as Apple about heat management. (i think you can almost count on the next iMac G5 or Mac Mini being in a metal case: plastic is one heck of an insulator.)

      of course, this is all idle speculation.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    25. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Ghost_MH · · Score: 1

      From everything I've heard, you're exactly right on that account. The Xbox360 and PS3's processors are in-order processors...It was a complaint several developers had with both consoles at this year's GDC.

    26. Re:PowerPC CPU? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      You don't get it either. How long is it going to take high-end PCs to be substaintially better than this xbox? This isn't like the last one, which would have made a so-so PC when it was first released. I don't see any three-core PPC 3.2 GHz machines on the horizon. Now what about mid-range PCs, which is what game developers target? How long until the avergare PC is better than the new xbox?

      The minimum reqs do influence how the top end scales when you are talking about physics and AI, which is the point of this discussion, not pushing polygons. If the physics engine won't run without a 4 GHz hyperthreaded Intel chip, then the game will play differently on a slower computer. This isn't just visual quality that is being discussed. As for AI, what if your enemies (and friends) were dumber because your machine was slow? Now on a console the devs know exactly what they have to work with, and they can exploit it all. Not so on PC games. High-end hardward won't be fully utilized for physics and AI until it becomes common.

    27. Re:PowerPC CPU? by adam31 · · Score: 1
      No way. XBox2 (and PS3) developers will have a guaranteed 20-25 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the highest end PCs today only get about 8 GB/s... and it's not getting better very quickly.

      The poor 300 Mhz processor that shipped with PS2 isn't even the bottleneck for that platform. You think that suddenly the processing power of PCs are going to trump the next-gen multi-cores?

      It's the memory-bandwidth baby.

    28. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That someone will have to battle with IBM - friend of Linux - and IBM's hypervisor technology.

    29. Re:PowerPC CPU? by glucoseboy · · Score: 1

      check the colony video,

      they show the MB with what appears to be a very large heat sink.

      the back of the enclosure shows two 80mm fans.

      one thing i can say is that xbox 360 won't be any quieter than the current xbox, which is too bad but understandable

    30. Re:PowerPC CPU? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      The Xbox 360 processor(s) have a shared L2 of 1MB

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    31. Re:PowerPC CPU? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Ah, that explains why the XBox 360 will be shipping with Excel Spreadsheet: The Game.


      Hey, I think I played that once. It was like Terminal Velocity, but with faces of MS developers on the ground.

    32. Re:PowerPC CPU? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Current PC's are already outstripping the game consoles by far. Just take a look at the absense of high resolutions and anti-aliasing and such like. With CRT based screens, this is not so much a problem since the anti-aliasing is more or less done by the CRT itself. Unfortunately this also affects the size of the fonts used for scoring etc.

      I'm wondering what will be happening now TV's are getting better and better. Will they optimize for HDTV resolutions or just normal TV screens, which are still in the majority? It's probably the latter, you'll see big fonts for some while. Even then, the resolution won't be 1280 x 1024, which is the default resolution on most monitors nowadays.

      If Microsoft is smart it will devide the cores to specific tasks (video/audio and core processing) so games will still be rather simple to implement.

    33. Re:PowerPC CPU? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      Well, that's because it's a powerPC variant. It's not the same PPC we find in Mac's. The regular PPC processors are designed for multipurpose use, as these will designed with game specifics in mind. They'll be similar, but not the same.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    34. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Luthair · · Score: 1
      I'm afraid you're the one who doesn't get it. Traditionally PC games at release aren't playable when set to highest quality on current hardware.

      PC Games are designed to *gasp* scale

    35. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The really funny part is that the XBox PowerPC buy goes to further the research and manufacturing of the core chip technology driving Apple Hardware.

      Or from a different viewpoint, Apple paid for all the research the led up to the current Xbox chip.

    36. Re:PowerPC CPU? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Informative
      FYI...

      login: slashdotnyt
      password: slashdotnyt

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    37. Re:PowerPC CPU? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      shit you are right. Of the two of us, who has written PC games? Ones that utilize 3d hardware?

      My point is that the 3d stuff scales (I agree with you there, so drop it!), the AI and physics do not. If you are processor-bound on those with high-end PC hardware then you are screwed. You have to write the physics and AI so they can run on the lowest common denominator hardware.

    38. Re:PowerPC CPU? by RobRancho · · Score: 1

      Microsoft isn't buying them from IBM because Microsoft owns the design, and therefore, the right to have any fab capable of producing them bid on a batch to manufacture. Same for the graphics chip. IBM and ATI are described as design 'partners', not suppliers.

    39. Re:PowerPC CPU? by phxbadash · · Score: 1

      erm...the current pc's are definetely outstripping the current gen consoles by far, but the next-gen ones will be leapfrogging them in performance, for the time being at least. The main reason that consoles up till now have remained fairly low res is because most tv's up till now have only been about 500 lines of resolution or so max. With HD becoming much more common that is changing very quickly. Also CRT's do absolutely nothing with regards to Anti-Aliasing. Since you obviousily haven't read any of TFA's on the xbox 360 I'll fill you in. M$ is requiring that ALL games made for the system support HD AND FS AA, so if you play the game on a HD-capable TV it will look as good as it can. Sure pc's will still be capable of higher resolutions but with HD tv's the way they are now text is easily readable even at a small size on them, I still wouldn't want to do word processing on it though.

    40. Re:PowerPC CPU? by CityZen · · Score: 1

      You can bet that Microsoft's PPC CPU will have a longer instruction pipeline (doing more steps to process each instruction, but doing less work in each step) in order to reach the higher clock speed. It's like the Pentium 4, where clock-for-clock it's slower than the Pentium 3 (or Pentium M).

      Just because its clock speed is higher doesn't mean it's "better". Because of the pipeline change, it MUST run faster just in order to keep up.

      Of course longer pipelines have their penalties as well: mispredicted branches hurt more, and scheduling becomes more complex.

    41. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Neutron+Bob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not quite.

      The Xbox360 CPU's are general purpose, and have the full PPC and Altivec units for each core.(well, almost, some altivec instructions are missing and many more were added, but this is just for x360). The Playstation3 on the otherhand has 1 general purpose PPC CPU and 6 to 8 cell processors, which are SIMD vector (but not altivec) units and not general purpose in the least.

      The Xbox360 is quite capable of running any C++ game logic, while the SIMD nature of the playstation3 cells make C++ not a good choice at all. Your original assesment about it being only a good number crunching machine is not quite right for x360 but totally fits the Playstation3.

      I'm honestly not sure how well this processor would work in a more general purpose PC setting though, mainly due to the fact that each core is running two threads (also issues 2 instructions per clock) so cache space is a bit of a concern. In games its easy to put 2 like threads on a CPU because we have very explicit control over it. On a PC this isn't really the case, and massive cache thrashing would be had.

    42. Re:PowerPC CPU? by techfury90 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's a lot of embedded PowerPC chips too... I remember a few years back seeing PowerPC based digital cameras as well. And yes, what my sig says is true. And yes, she's pretty hot, and no you don't get to see a pic. Besides she's not even 15 anyway.

      --
      I'm friends with the youngest daughter of the former head of the PowerPC division of IBM you insensitive clod!
    43. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer gaygaygay (user & pw) better.

    44. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not actually water-cooled. Heat-piped to a leetle block of fins. If it were really water-cooled, you'd see a lot more cooling apparatus inside the thing.

      Anything involving liquid is 'water cooling' to a journalist.

    45. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Anti_zeitgeist · · Score: 1

      holy crap, i thought you were kidding....wow!

      --
      If it wasn't for C, we would be stuck using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.
    46. Re:PowerPC CPU? by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      So? Gates owns quite a bit of Apple stock. He has an interest in seeing Apple succeed. He also hase an interest in seeing Apple continue to be viewed as competition to MS: It keeps the anti-trust lawsuits at bay. Whichever company wins, Gates wins.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    47. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      to those of you wondering about the cpu's being able to be produced for the xbox360 and G5's.

      this is from Tom's Hardwares site (http://www7.tomshardware.com/game/200505121/xbox_ 360-05.html\

      "With specs this impressive, it's easy to see why a few of us wondered how they planned to make a profit, given that they were already operating at a loss as a result of hardware costs for the current platform. "This time, we own the silicon [chip designs]. We can have [the chips] manufactured at different foundries to keep costs down."

      Doesn't sound to me like they need to wait on IBM to make anything. They can have the lowest bidder make cpu's for them. Not to mention, later down the road, other parts of the system might end up on new chips (like they did with the original playstation and the newer PSOne) to keep costs down ever farther.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    48. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      No, John, I don't yet have "a hardware accelerator for game physics in your PC?"
      But, they are going to be shipping by the time the Xbox 360 is being released.
      And here's a link for it:
      http://interviews.teamxbox.com/xbox/1117/AGEIA-Tec hnologies-Interview/p1

      --
      Be seeing you...
    49. Re:PowerPC CPU? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      while I'm not trying to knock your programming expertise, or anything, I don't understand how you can expect so much from the Xbox360 when you haven't seen anything play on it?
      Yes, MS is throwing some nice specs out there, just like Sony is about the Cell chips. Just like Nvidia and Ati does about new GPU's, etc...
      It's marketing hype and most of the people here are falling for it head over heals.
      What if programming these new chips are hard (like Sega Saturn was?), what if these PowerPC chips are crappy? So what if they go 3.2 ghz and has 3 different cores?
      Why don't we wait until we actually see some games in action, you know, like live demos, not taped bullshit?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    50. Re:PowerPC CPU? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, that is an interesting article. Note that the article itself says that this is just going to be used for eye candy and not influence gameplay itself for a while until these things are widespread. Again, we see how the fragmentation of the PC market can take away some of the advantages of superior hardware.

    51. Re:PowerPC CPU? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      You are right, I do not know the details of the performance of these chips. I will say that I expect the cell to be able crunch a lot of the numbers needed for physics. I would be pretty shocked if the xbox cpu isn't at least equivalent to current high-end cpus in terms of what needs to be done for games. I am probably biased given that I work for the company that makes both of the chips.

    52. Re:PowerPC CPU? by 2ms · · Score: 1

      The large radiator inside the outermost shell could cool just the same as an external one as long as the same amount of air is blowing past it.

      For all we know there could be a radiator 10x the size of typical cpu heatsink lying flat in there with every Jule of energy the CPUs could possibly waste being instantly wisked away by jetstream of air rushing by it.

      Wouldn't even have to have a large exhaust outlet as long as the mass flow rate was the same (ie inlet fan same diameter and rpm) -- the velocity of air at outlet would just go up to match flow rate of inlet fan

  4. For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The following is being offered free of charge to all those who feel the need to troll the Slashdot Games section. Please print out a copy and keep it with you at all times. If you follow these simple steps, you trolling is guaranteed to improve.

    1. If a game is currently on PS2 and there are plans to bring it out on the Xbox, make sure to claim that no one will want to play that game by the time it gets to the Xbox. For example, by the time Virtua Fighter 4/GTA3 comes to the Xbox, we'll all be playing something new.
    2. Use the reverse logic if it is a game only on the Xbox that may be ported to other systems/PC later. Case in point, Halo. Say something to the effect of "I'll wait for the true version of Halo on the PC". "It will be much better than the Xbox version".
    3. Constantly complain about FPS on consoles ACCEPT for Goldeneye.
    4. Always use Bill Gates name. Act as if he is the one making the games.
    By all means, if you run out of clever or interesting things to troll about, just bring up Mr Gates. Lots of people hate him and will be glad to agree with you.
    5. Complain about the XBox controller. Even if you have never seen or used it, it won't matter. People will believe you when you say it's big. Be sure and try to provide a testimonial about your wife or girlfriend or kid who complains about the size of it. Also claiming to be injured by the controller can be the foundation of a great troll post.
    6. When referring to the Xbox, try to scew the name a bit. Xblox, eggs bocks, the stupider the name, the more favorable of a response you will get.
    7. Be sure and mention Japanese and European sales numbers. If you aren't sure what those sales numbers are, go ahead and make something up. Estimate low, most people will believe you.
    8. Although Xbox owners seem to enjoy there games, make sure to comment on Xbox not having any games with good gameplay. Although the Xbox does share some ports with PS2 and Gamecube, it's okay to assume that the Xbox version of those ports has poor gameplay as well.
    9. Since the Xbox has nice graphics, be sure and find a way to put a negative spin on this. Using the age old formula that states if a game has nice graphics, it must have terrible gameplay, you can convince people that Xbox games are all tech demos.
    10. Defective Xbox stories are excellent to use in trolling. The best part is that they require no proof. I find that "the screen just froze up" works great. Occasionally you can use something really bizarre like "My friend bought an Xbox and it caught on fire and burned down there house. Now they are homeless. F*** Bill Gates."
    11. When all else fails, lie. There are lots of people who will agree with you just because they hate MS

    1. Re:For the Trolls by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1, Funny

      6. When referring to the Xbox, try to scew the name a bit. Xblox, eggs bocks, the stupider the name, the more favorable of a response you will get.

      I would also suggest calling it the "suXbox"

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:For the Trolls by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny

      People will believe you when you say it's big. Be sure and try to provide a testimonial about your wife or girlfriend or kid who complains about the size of it.

      That's just sick dude, leave the kids out of it ;-).

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bought an Xblox the other day, and I wish I hadn't. I guess the poor sales number should have warned me (since they only sold 3000 EggsBlockses in Europe, and 12 in Japan). I don't know what Bill Gates was thinking when he designed the controller, but it really hurts my hands. It's way too big!

      I was playing a game with it once, and it started vibrating, jumped right out of my hands, and severely wounded a small child. Also, it's strained my fingers so much, I'm starting to have problems 'viewing' my Natalie Portman image collection! I'm going to sue Bill Gates!
      Sure, some of the games may have nice graphics, but the gameplay is absolutely shocking. I tried to play Halo, but it's nothing but a tech demo!

      You may not believe this, but it's actually impossible to shoot! I played for five minutes, and couldn't kill anything at all, so I took the game back to the shop. It has nothing on Goldeneye. I'm going to wait for the PC version, which should be much better.

      Also, my son really wanted me to buy a console, so that he could play GTA3, so imagine my surprise when I found out it was not yet released on the Xbox! You're a nigger. He had to undergo therapy for several weeks - but I'll get the money back from Bill Gates when I sue him.

      I'm going to sell my XSocks on Ebay now. It'll probably cost me a lot in shipping, because it's really heavy. Bill Gates designed it that way, because he likes to hit immigrants over the head with his. I'll never buy another M$ product!"

    4. Re:For the Trolls by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's offering something for the grammar trolls as well.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:For the Trolls by Araxen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ahhhhh a new script kiddie term is born.

    6. Re:For the Trolls by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, you have to to end with "Anyway, I only bought one because Bill Gates loses money on each one they sell."

    7. Re:For the Trolls by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1, Funny

      With the ACCEPTION of general overuse of commas, I don't know what you are talking about.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:For the Trolls by bhsx · · Score: 3, Funny

      1. Noone will want to play Madden 2002 by the time it gets to Xbox.
      2. I'll wait for the GNU/Linux version of Tony Hawk American Wasteland, thank you very much!
      3. I have yet to see decent FPS in consoles lately, I mean I used to get ~22 FPS in Goldeneye.
      4. Besides, Bill Gates writes shitty games.
      5. The Xbox controller ate my baby!
      6. Also, couldn't they have come-up with something more original than Xbochs? I mean, haven't we all (besides slow-ass Debian) switched to Xorg-bochs now anyway?
      7. The Japanese are nuts about consoles, but you know what? Xbox 360 has sold ZERO, that's right, ZERO units there (I'm not making this stuff up!)
      8. The Xbox port of GTA ate my baby!
      9. Um, Xbox games are all tech demos, very little actual gameplay involved my friend.
      10. My mom washed my Xbox, and it BLEW UP!
      11. I have an Xbox 360 and it sucks. I use it now for weighing down my paninis.
      And may I add, WTF? You know these listed posts are supposed to start with 0, right? HAND

      --
      put the what in the where?
    9. Re:For the Trolls by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      I always perfered "LinXbox"

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    10. Re:For the Trolls by ricotest · · Score: 1

      Ahahahaha this is getting modded as a Troll, some mods are fucking stupid.

    11. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 3. Constantly complain about FPS on consoles ACCEPT for Goldeneye.

      If you're going to EMPHASIZE a word, it would HELP to choose the CORRECT word.

    12. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's the first time I've ever read the word nigger and busted out laughing. Priceless.

    13. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i could troll about your grammar and typing abilities but i'll leave that for another day.

    14. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thanks for the guidelines.
      1. There aren't many good original games for Xbox, and pretty much every port to it is long-delayed and lackluster when it arrives. I guess Xbox owners can expect to see GTA: San Andreas in 2009, while PS2 owners are playing the new hotness two sequels ahead.

      2. I've read that Jade Empire is a decent game, but I know it will be much better when they release the GNU/Hurd port, especially since my 1337 rig has a graphics card that cost more than any two major consoles on the market put together.

      3. Now, I'm pretty good at first person shooters on the PC- usually, I go about 150-3 on most of the Counterstrike 7.0 beta servers I play on. But when I tried to play Halo 2 at a friend's house, I kept getting killed by newbs. I was like, OMG WTF TLA! Obviously, that had nothing to do with my skillz as a gamer, and everything to do with the terrible control scheme of console FPS games. Give me a mouse and keyboard, and all of those lamers would cry themselves to sleep that night. Halo was so lame, it wouldn't even let me wallhack. There hasn't been a playable console FPS since Goldeneye for the N64.

      4. How could you possibly want to use a product made by noted monopolist Bill Gates? Clearly, the Xbox is just an attempt to unfairly dominate yet another market. I heard Bill Gates is putting superrestrictive DRM in the next version of the Xbox that won't let you play any media without a M$ Certificate of Authenticity. I also heard it will use robots to seek and destroy any non-Micro$oft consoles in your home. And that Bill Gates stole all of the cool technology in the Xbox from Apple, and then took a crap on Steve Jobs's lawn.

      5. The Xbox controller is freakishly huge. My girlfriend left me because the controller was too heavy for her to use; I hear she's seeing a PC gamer now. I kept trying to play games with it, but its unwieldy size and shape gave me arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and cancer of the hands. Once the lesions and hives heal, the doctors say I can return to gaming, as long as I use a more ergonomic controller, like the one for the Atari Jaguar.

      6. Xbox? More like the Micro$haft Xlax, since playing it gives you explosive diarrhea!.

      7. The M$ YecchsBahx has been a dismal sales failure in Europe and Japan. No consoles have ever been sold in Japan, as the Xbox is physically much larger than the average Tokyo apartment. The latest sales figures for Europe show that roughly 7 Xboxes are sold each week in Europe, compared to 1,654,894 GameCubes and 10^15 Playstation 2 units. It is believed that most of the Xboxs sold in Europe are actually used solely as stands for other game consoles.

      8. Bill Gates hasn't released a single compelling game for the X-Borkz. Halo was interesting for about 30 seconds, and then I fell asleep. KOTOR would have been much more fun on GameCube, or on the TurboGrafx-16.
      9. Sure, games on the Eggsbox have flashy graphics, but as we all know, these games sacrifice gameplay for pretty lighting effects. When I play a game on my PS2, the jaggy edges and lower framerates are a sure sign that a game has exciting gameplay.

      10. One of my friends bought an eX-Box, and when he tried to play a game, the disc ejected out of the XBox and severed his carotid artery. Bill Gates killed my friend.

      11. Jesus hates the Xbox.

    15. Re:For the Trolls by Temsi · · Score: 1

      I hate to be a prick, but this has to be said...
      Nothing personal, just pet peeves of mine:

      "THERE" refers to a location, as in 'over there'.
      "THEIR" refers to something which belongs to someone, as in 'their house'.

      So, it's not 'there games', it's "their games", and it's not "there house", it's "their house".

      And since I'm on the subject, "they're" means "they are", although you didn't make that mistake, but anyone who confuses their and there, will probably mess this one up as well.

      Also, ACCEPT means to take something, as in "I accept this gift". It was also a great 80's Metal band.
      EXCEPT refers to something which differs from the whole, as in "they all died, except one."

      That having been said... funny post.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    16. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, it's spelled "penis", not this "paninis" word you've made up. Second of all, why on earth you'd want to weigh-down your johnson with an Xbox 360 is beyond me. I mean, hell, if you're gonna do anything with it, you should probably use it to make some of those delicious grilled Italian sandwiches. What are those called, anyway?

    17. Re:For the Trolls by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      4. Besides, Bill Gates writes shitty games.

      Really? I thought Software Tycoon was kind of cool.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    18. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      No. It absolutely did not have to be said.

    19. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, the guy who moderated you -1 offtopic sure loves himself some suXbox.

    20. Re:For the Trolls by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Actually it did, and it unfortunately still does.
      As long as people keep making that remarkably stupid mistake, it does indeed need to be mentioned.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    21. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Xbox 360 and it sucks. I use it now for weighing down my paninis

      Ok, this is either akin to a 'pianist,' or I don't want to know...

    22. Re:For the Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, GNU Tycoon is far cooler.

    23. Re:For the Trolls by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Irony, I bought my kid an XBox for christmas of 2003, and the first one died after about 15 min into the first game after being hooked up.. replaced.. the second died a week later.. the third has been running strong ever since.. I've got a few friends with mod-chipped xboxes, and others that have had theirs since initial release.. I actually like the thing, but was weird to get two bad ones in a row like that...

      Only thing it *did* do, was discourage me from mod-chipping this one..

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    24. Re:For the Trolls by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Well, since you were nice enough to point out some errors, I have a little something for those of you who forget their there's. =)

      There has here in it, so it's for locations.
      Their has heir in it, so it's always for people.

      Anyone that can't get they're right must smoke more weed then I do, 'cause even with my learning disabilities, I never make that mistake.
      So thair.

      --
      Be seeing you...
  5. 30 minutes? by RasendeRutje · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jeez, a 30 minutes show, and no information at all, (except its uglyness and stupid name...)
    ... oh wait... its MTV what else could you expect?

    --

    If Microsoft was mass, stupidity would be gravity.
    1. Re:30 minutes? by mattmentecky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jeez, a 30 minutes show, and no information at all, (except its uglyness and stupid name...)

      Hey don't talk about the Ashlee Simpson show like that, she has feelings too ya know! ;)

    2. Re:30 minutes? by Sandbox+Conspiracy · · Score: 0

      Uh, Carmen Electra dancing topless next to it? Zing!

      --
      Why am I on Slashdot? I'm bored. Why am I bored? I'm on Slashdot.
    3. Re:30 minutes? by slapout · · Score: 5, Funny

      MTV -- "Music Television"

      its MTV what else could you expect?

      Certainly not music.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    4. Re:30 minutes? by technogoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 30 minute show was awful. It can be summed up thus:
      8 minutes of the Killers
      +
      13 minutes of ads
      +
      3 minutes of talk
      +
      6 minutes of actual xbox 360 related stuff

      And I thought it was going to be an uninterrupted 30 minutes of revealing inside info on the product.

    5. Re:30 minutes? by CFTM · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if I can hurt those feelings, I think I've had a pretty good day. As far as I'm concerned the Simpson family is waisting my precious oxygen, as is the hilton family, the ritche family, the reid family (I had the misfortune of going to college with Tara's younger sister...imagine Tara fat and ugly) and I could continue this list on ad naseum but I shall refrain from trolling anymore than I already have this morning...sorta like crack got get me some to start the day!

    6. Re:30 minutes? by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      .. oh wait... its MTV what else could you expect?

      Lots of "bling-bling" and preteens screaming to see 15 seconds of footage from their latest favorite vide... err... Xbox game.

      I like how not a single person I know (including my teenage sisters, and the friends of theirs that I *do* know) watches any MTV, yet they still haven't changed programming back to music videos yet. Which begs the question, who *is* watching it?

    7. Re:30 minutes? by ac3boy · · Score: 0

      I do not know about anyone elase but this little
      show made me feel so old and I am only in my 30s.

      Could it have been anymore of a time burglar.

      Sheesh!

    8. Re:30 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of their viewers are in foreign countries now, that's why everybody hates the US.

    9. Re:30 minutes? by protosage · · Score: 1

      A Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction?

    10. Re:30 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello! Wow! Nice Digs! I didn't like the show much but I love the music. Keep singing. It befits you more than reality TV. Glad you're breaking away from Viacom and into the outside world. At least a little bit. Or maybe its me. Drop me a line sometime at noisecontrol@gmail.com if you're ever bored. Here's my books and music www.ncpink.com which stands for Noise Control Publishing INK.

      Chris!

    11. Re:30 minutes? by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      sshh America's Shiniest Objects is on right now.

    12. Re:30 minutes? by J3Holaday · · Score: 1

      that's right... We were all suckered into watching moron television.

  6. Least... Informative... Site... Ever... by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

    Maybe the US version is more elaborate but the Dutch site sports some pictures of the XBox 360 amd its controller plus an invitation to become a member of the XBox 360 community.

    Once every now and then the Slashdot writeup is actually more informative than TFA. This is one of those times.

    1. Re:Least... Informative... Site... Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US version is no more elaborate.

    2. Re:Least... Informative... Site... Ever... by wojci2 · · Score: 1

      You are right, but the picture drawn by a kid using MS-Paint made it all worth waiting for the macromedia flash to load.

      --


      /wojci
  7. Backward compat by bunburyist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No where is it written that the next XBox will play current XBox games.

    According to the title the Xbox 360 will play current XBox games. No where does the article provide any supporting evidence to this claim, and in fact largely runs counter to it. Nvidia says all but no, an unknown independent analyst agrees, ATI says that it is statistically possible, and some other unknown agrees with them. Microsoft says... Nothing. According to other sources Microsoft is "not guaranteeing" backwards compatibility, and if they decide not to include a hard drive such compatibility may not be possible at all.

    nVidia may very well be playing to the press, but that doesn't mean such a thing wouldn't be difficult or expensive. Most systems achieve backwards compatibility by finding uses for the extra hardware. Software emulation for compatibility has never been attempted professionally in the console arena, but amature software emulation tends to lag two systems behind. You can push an XBox to do a meaningful SNES, but Dreamcast emulation is right out. With the right software the SNES could emulate the 2600, but not the NES.

    Personally, I don't see why they don't just include a detachable Xbox chipset as a free add-on with an overpriced "premium" system with two controllers, and sell a regular setup with one controller for 100 dollars less.

    But, as I mentioned before, no such thing has been announced yet.

    1. Re:Backward compat by Daedalus_ · · Score: 1

      What happened to N64?

    2. Re:Backward compat by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft is not guaranteeing backwards compatibility so that nobody can hold them to that promise. If they happen to get it to work, they can trumpet it. If they can't, no one can say that they promised it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Backward compat by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      It wasn't backwards compatible to the SNES.

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the way the Xbox architecture works, it could be backwards compatible, as game writers for the Xbox use a programming interface and not the hardware interface directly. This should allow most games to work. Its not a definite, but I would be interested to see, as when the initial Xbox launched, the big hype in the developer world was they could just write the code, let the Xbox API handle the hardware communication. How many did this? I have no clue.

    5. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, not having a hard-drive won't really be the main problem.

      The Xbox 360 uses a completely different processor (PPC) than the Xbox (Intel).

    6. Re:Backward compat by swv3752 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, look at the specs- 3 cores each running at triple the speed of the orignal Xbox. It has 8 times the ram. The GPU is more than twice as fast. There is a reason MS bought Virtual PC.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    7. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the BBC has stated in an article that Microsoft is currently working on backwards compatibility and as they pointed out on the XBox-scene, the ourcolony video shows them running current generation games on it.

    8. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > There is a reason MS bought Virtual PC.

      And it was x86 server virtualization. If the xbox was to be back-compatible, we'd know by now, so it is time to stop pretending it could be possible.

    9. Re:Backward compat by cassidyc · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ok I'll feed ya,

      So is that how my PC can emulate:
      spectrum
      C64
      Amiga
      BBC
      Apple
      many types of nintendo
      many types of sega
      Arcade machines
      Playstation

    10. Re:Backward compat by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I think he was refering to the fact that xBox can run N64 emulators perfectly on many games and pretty damned close on the others.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    11. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, most of those are like 1 or 2 Mhz 8-bit 2D machines.

      This new machine needs to emulate an 800 Mhz Pentium3 with full blown hardware accelerated 3D.

      Even if you can match the 3D performance, emulating that speed a processor on another hardware platform just ain't gonna happen.

    12. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While true, there is a big difference between emulating games of those types with a very powerful general purpose CPU, compaired to the specifically geared game console. Most of your list ran under 10Mhz (nintendo and such being around 1Mhz). Now take a gaming system that runs currently at about 1Ghz, and try to emulate it with on a different CPU arch where the different CPU doesn't have THAT much more horsepower. You can start to see the problem. I'm not saying that it's not possible, but most of us are thinking that it is rather unrealistic considering the first Xbox came out not too long ago, and technology hasn't gone too far.

    13. Re:Backward compat by CFTM · · Score: 1

      The stuff that I've read seems to suggest that they have about 90% of the code written to make the thing backwards compatible but they are not sure whether that last 10% is going to get done by release. Apparently it's supposed to be the trickiest part, I think if it gets done they'll include it but I doubt they're going to bust their budget making it backwards compatible. I am a loser and have already set aside money for my Xbox360...I'm going to buy one so I might as well just accept it and move on :)

    14. Re:Backward compat by ffejie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, even if they know it's not backwards compatible, they don't want to announce it now. That would hurt current sales of games for the current XBox, because a lot of people see them as an investment. By keeping quiet on it, they can announce no backwards compatibility when it comes out so as to not hurt sales of old games.

      --
      Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
    15. Re:Backward compat by Troed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Software emulation for compatibility has never been attempted professionally in the console arena

      Nintendo has NES, SNES and N64 emulators written and used as bonuses in Gamecube games.

    16. Re:Backward compat by confu2000 · · Score: 1

      What about Bleem for Dreamcast? That emulated PS1 games in software.

    17. Re:Backward compat by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Well, there are Legal and technical issues to overcome regarding this. Nvidia has some patents that need to be overcome.

      I expect the final answer will be some but not all games will work and use at own risk. I expect a few MS owned games like Halo will work but everything else is going to be a crapshoot.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    18. Re:Backward compat by angrist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they get it to work, they can slap it on a disk and charge $50 for the "enhancement." Just like they did for DVD playback on the original.

    19. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but the point of the original argument was that they CPU architecture was different.

      I showed that that wasn`t an issue.

    20. Re:Backward compat by gh · · Score: 1

      It was for all manners of virtualization. They use virtual pc technology in the following areas:

      * x86 desktop pc virtualization
      * x86 server virtualization
      * emulation of smart device platforms
      * x86 desktop pc virtualization (Mac)

      The last one is the interesting one for this discussion. They've updated Virtual PC for the Mac to take advantage of the G5 processor's features.

      If they have the experience in applying virtualization technology to leverage the features of the PowerPC architecture, why do people consider it so infeasible that they couldn't apply it to the Xbox 360?

    21. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also bear in mind that we are trying to emulate an 800Mhz processor with 3 3.2 Ghz processors, each processor multi-threads. And we all know that clock speed is not a indicator of a processors real speed, but also it's ability to perform operations in fewer clock cycles.

      If you want comparible speeds I've got a C64 emulator for my Amiga so thats 1Mhz processor running on a 7Mhz processor.

    22. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You need to pay closer attention to what has been going on with the PowerPC group from Virtual PC. If you think the 360 is not going to be backwards compatible, then you are in for a surprise!

    23. Re:Backward compat by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      yeah but the point of the original argument was that they CPU architecture was different.

      I guess that he didn't feel the need to point out the obvious--different CPU architecture means that compatibility could only be achieved by emulation, and emulation always extracts a major performance penalty, such that in practice it is only possible to adequately emulate machines multiple generations back.

    24. Re:Backward compat by Momoru · · Score: 1

      At first I thought this was a big issue, and then I asked myself...how often did i play my tons of old play station games on the ps2? The answer is, never, or at most maybe once. Its hard to use the eye burning graphics of the previous generation after playing the new stuff. Especially since games these days are so graphic-centric. And if i really want to play the old ones, i still have the old console.

    25. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      proof?

    26. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a few pictures out there, (http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2005/news/03 /09/allardkeynote_screen001.jpg)
      That show Forza Motorsports in the new Xbox Live Marketplace. Now this is not definitive proof but it leads to some answers;
      a) X360 is backwards compatible
      or
      b) A new version of Forza is coming for X360

      Now I dont know which one to be true so I guess its wait and see.

    27. Re:Backward compat by jedimasta · · Score: 0

      You can't base emulation on older, largely proprietary systems like the SNES. Whether they include emulation or not will strictly be a marketing decision. You have to realize that these are by and large windows PCs, so backwards compatibility should be a technical no-brainer. Besides that, PlayStation set the standard (actually, technically the GBA did) that any console maker would be remiss NOT to include.

      --
      Who is more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows?
    28. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      that's not true emulation though, they tweaked the code of individual games in order to scale them and alter their sfx for each individual game, wheras an emulator is supposed to play original games while providing a universal platform to use the games on.

    29. Re:Backward compat by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Also, even if they know it's not backwards compatible, they don't want to announce it now. That would hurt current sales of games for the current XBox, because a lot of people see them as an investment.

      Conversely, if it is backwards compatible, this would have been the time to announce, as many people will likely defer buying XBox software over compatibility concerns

    30. Re:Backward compat by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      They kept the DVD kit separate on the original Xbox to keep the cost down. They have to pay a licensing fee for every Xbox they sell that can play DVD movies. So they sold the kit separately to keep the base system's cost down, and to keep the licensing fees to a minimum.

    31. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      proof?

      You must be new here! Welcome to Slashdot!

    32. Re:Backward compat by zrk · · Score: 1

      Early adopters of the 360 will welcome the chance to continue to play their faves on newer hardware. Over time, of course, as upgraded games appear, the older games will sit on the shelf.

      Maybe MS hasn't said anything definitive one way or the other means they're still working on the emulator and won't know much until later? Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part.

    33. Re:Backward compat by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "There is a reason MS bought Virtual PC."

      What would that do to help with the differences between the NVidia and the ATI chipset?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    34. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what you're talking about, but to run all the NES, SNES, and N64 Zelda games on the Gamecube would require either emulation of the old hardware or porting of the code. It's obvious that they didn't port any code because of the audio glitches in scene transitions in Majora's Mask. The glitches are the result of the Gamecube not having enough RAM for the game rom, emulator code, and the 8 MB of free RAM that the game expects. The other games on that compilation are all perfect. You're going to have to explain what you mean by "true emulation" if you still disagree.

    35. Re:Backward compat by devinoni · · Score: 1

      Except Microsoft has yet to port Virtual PC to 64-bit PowerPC chips. The biggest issue is that the POWER derived chips are big-endian only. VirtualPC on the 32-bit PowerPC chips just has the PowerPC run in little-endian mode.

    36. Re:Backward compat by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      The support for backwards capability is there if the XBox API is unchanged from before (or if the original calls are still supported), but even then it will come down to if the developers used the XBox API alone, or if they used hardware targeted code as well.

      As such, odds are when the XBox 360 comes out it will offer limited backwards capability support. Most likely along the lines of "We provided the XBox developers with the tools to make sure their games where forwards compatible, and we left the API calls unchanged so if they did their job the games will run fine, but don't hold us accountable if you can't play all of them because of something that the developers did."

    37. Re:Backward compat by bozoman42 · · Score: 1
      The grandparent post's point is that Nintendo knows exactly which parts of the emulation they need to implement and which parts can make assumptions about the code running, because the emulator is only designed to run just the one ROM (as it's rebuilt for each N64 game they ship).

      Also witness how in "the scene" you can rip the emulator and package it with other N64 ROM's, but how well they work (if at all) is extremely inconsistent. If it were a true emulator, all ROM's would work perfectly without modification.

    38. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that shouldn't be a problem if the game developers wrote to MS' API standards. That would allow MS to rip out one chipset and it's corresponding driver and swap in another.

    39. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now take a gaming system that runs currently at about 1Ghz, and try to emulate it with on a different CPU arch where the different CPU doesn't have THAT much more horsepower.

      three 3.2GHz PPC chips aren't that much more than a 800MHz PIII??
    40. Re:Backward compat by Pete+Brubaker · · Score: 1

      Highly doubtful. The original core was x86, this core is PPC. Different endianness. They would have to find some way to swap the endianness of the hardware for this to work. That or endian swap the data that is being read of the disc. Ain't gonna happen. You want to play old games? Buy an xbox. Want to play new games? Buy an xbox360.

      Just my $0.02.

      --P

      --
      What's a sig? Pete Brubaker
    41. Re:Backward compat by NereusRen · · Score: 1

      "Software emulation for compatibility has never been attempted professionally in the console arena"

      This is actually not suite true. When Sega released the "Genesis Smash Packs" for the Dreamcast, which consisted of ~10 Genesis games, it turns out they actually coded a general emulator and included the ROMs for each of the games. They only fully debugged it for those particular games, but it worked pretty damn well on everything else too.

      How do I know? Because some enterprising hackers (the Utopia group) ripped the emulator out, called it SegaGen, and let you burn CDs full of ROMs to use with it. Full-speed, with only occasional games having glitches with sound or graphics.

      Of course, this also lagged 2 generations behind, just like the amateur attempts... but it was a professionally coded emulator.

    42. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      You think a little thing like endianness would be a real obstacle for the boys at MSFT? No. The obstacle here is legal. I imagine they face the choice of either a very expensive agreement with nvidia or a reverse-engineering effort which may or may not be ready in time for xbox360 launch (and may or may not work 100% perfectly.) My guess is that eventually there will be both official and unofficial ways to play xbox games on xbox360, but probably not at product launch date. I would like to be proven wrong on that.

    43. Re:Backward compat by justin_saunders · · Score: 1

      And why is it needed? Really?

      If you have a bunch of old XBOX games then surely you have an XBOX to play them on...

      --

      "My cat's breath smells like cat food." - The Tao of Ralph Wiggum.
    44. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep rationalizing fanboy, although you have your work cut out for you:

      1) Weakass hardware
      2) No BC
      3) Retarded developer support - how 'bout those Rare guys!

      This disaster for MS is so bad I'm starting to feel sorry for them and their fanboys..

    45. Re:Backward compat by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and like all consoles, the profit is in the software. Microsoft wants you to buy as many XBox games as possible, so if the XBox360 can play them, it would be to their advantage to say so to keep people in the stores for XBox 1 games.

      The only reason that they might not say so is if there's a chance they can't get it to work.

      --
      -twb
    46. Re:Backward compat by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      MS didn't update VPC to take advantage of the G5. They updated it to run, period. VPC used to work based on the trick that the PPC could swap byte orders at run time. This was added in the big fork when the PowerPC forked from IBM's POWER chip 10 years ago.

      When it forked again 2 years ago with the G5 (PPC970), they added Altivec, but not the endian-switch-hitterness. Therefore, the G5 wouldn't run VirtualPC.

      Microsoft updated the software to work on the G5. They did this because it's a product, and they wanted to sell it. It's an expensive product, targeted at high-end users (who use G5s), and it sells windows licenses. They don't really care if you're running it on a real x86 chip somewhere or if you're using VPC. Either way, they still get your money for Windows.

      --
      -twb
    47. Re:Backward compat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition there would be issues with the licensing that Microsoft has with game developers, which is make or break just as working the compatibility between architectures is.

  8. Torrent link to the video by AIX-Hood · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a torrent link for the OurColony video: XBOX360Vid.wmv.torrent

    1. Re:Torrent link to the video by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      Why? The actual site is fast and the high quality file is only like 36 MB. It comes down as a ZIP'd WMV...

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    2. Re:Torrent link to the video by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or does zipping a compressed WMV file make no sense?

    3. Re:Torrent link to the video by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I just tried it... 9KB/s for the direct download (a 1 hour download). Over bittorrent, it ran steadily up to 470KB/s and the whole file was down in two minutes!

    4. Re:Torrent link to the video by Warpedcow · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I just downloaded the direct download at about 800K/sec (at work - big pipe).

      --
      moo
    5. Re:Torrent link to the video by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately the video doesn't say much, does it? Except they do claim 1 TFlops(!!) Who knows what that means, though; it might include GPU, i.e. not general purpose.

      I was disappointed that it was all tech talk and no cool game previews at all.

    6. Re:Torrent link to the video by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      It was still infinitely better than watching that MTV trash where Frodo kept introducing us to The Killers over and over again while some rapper tries to get the "down low" on what's new in the X-Box 360.

      Shit like this makes me ashamed to be a gamer.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    7. Re:Torrent link to the video by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      Maybe to keep it from accidentally opening automatically in a media player? I dunno honestly..

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
  9. Meh... by slot32 · · Score: 1

    Still no CONFIRMED lauch date, price, confirmation of HD DVD or Blu-Ray (Tell a lie, I think they said NO Next Gen Drive), backwards compatability, region coding, Video connectors - i.e HDMI, DVI, VGA , if a HDD is *standard* on all the consoles or optional, summaries on the various models that are supposedly going to be released, AND number of units on launch for each reigion (USA, Europe, Japan Etc).

    But we got lots of pretty pictures and infomation that we can change the facia of the console... Whoopie doo!

    1. Re:Meh... by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      VGA output is what I'm really hoping for. I don't have an HDTV, so my computer monitor is the only way I'd be able to really get alot out of the Xbox 360.

    2. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chill.

      If you're going to bust a vessel over "probably sometime this November" then shut your freakin mouth. The ourColony video was more substantial, and certainly more than any other console developer has released (ever?)

    3. Re:Meh... by slot32 · · Score: 1

      I noticed you didn;'t have enough hair on you ass to post with your real UID... Fucking fanboi... back under the bridge with ya!

  10. controller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the fact that M$ hasn't listen to anyone in the design, and kept the controller the size of a small nation...

  11. Sweet! by republican+gourd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing like 6 months to a year of lead-time to make yourself the next Dreamcast.

    1. Re:Sweet! by inkdesign · · Score: 0

      I completely agree.

    2. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't.

    3. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me either.

    4. Re:Sweet! by aftk2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or the next PS2.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    5. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0






      I'm on the fence.




    6. Re:Sweet! by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Or the next PS2, relative to the Xbox 1.

      Honestly, wasn't Sega was starting to suffer BEFORE the dreamcast? I mean, look at the Sega Saturn, which suffered horribly compared to the N64 and Playstation:

      "The Saturn came out only a couple months apart from the Sony Playstation. The PSX's lower price tag attracted many buyers, while the difficulty of developing games on the Saturn helped to keep away 3rd-party developers." Source (just because it is the "source")

      The Dreamcast was riding on the downhill course set by the Saturn. Not to mention how expensive the thing started out being, and how lackluster their marketing was compared to Sony's.

  12. Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The specs look amazing but I have to ask:

    Why is Microsoft making it difficult to write games that run on both PC (Windows XP) and XBox 360?

    One of the primary reasons I use Windows is for games. If game developers stop writing for Windows because they move to XBox 360, then it'll make it even easier for me to go all FreeBSD or Linux or Mac OSX.

    Wouldn't it have been easier for XBox 360 to have a Windows XP or Windows Mobile 2005 foundation with just a custom explorer interface to make it look less-PC?

    1. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One of the primary reasons I use Windows is for games. If game developers stop writing for Windows because they move to XBox 360, then it'll make it even easier for me to go all FreeBSD or Linux or Mac OSX.


      Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.

      Simply put, games are not our strategy for the PC. The way we see it, in five years the PC will mostly be relegated to unwashed hobbyists; and the mainstream user will getting their music from an ipod like device (we have several ipod killers in various stages of development and testing) and their entertainment from media centers and our gaming console.

      In short, people won't flock to Linux from XP; they'll flock from the PC to one of our specialty devices.
    2. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think you have missed a few presentations where Microsoft has said they are building their tool sets to make it EASIER to build games on both platforms.

    3. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by slntnsnty · · Score: 1, Funny

      Almost sounded rational until you got to the part about "we have several ipod killers in various stages of development"

      Then I realized you were a Bill Gates impersonator.

    4. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC Gaming is DYING. In fact it might already be DEAD. Red ink flows like a river of blood...

      Well, not quite, but it's certainly not a growing market. The only titles that sell are FPS rehashes. 90% of XBox-360 games will never be released on PC.

    5. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by rokzy · · Score: 1

      the reason why consoles can have PC-like performance with vastly inferior hardware is because they *don't* have an OS.

      put an OS designed for a PC on there and not only do you lose performance to it but you also rule out any hardware optimisations based on not needing an OS.

      it's a bit like emulation - no matter how good your specs are you'll always have far worse performance than the same software running on the correct hardware.

    6. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      Why is Microsoft making it difficult to write games that run on both PC (Windows XP) and XBox 360?

      Let's say there are people who have both a pc and an xbox, and want to play the same game on both platforms. They will have to buy 2 games. Meaning more money for MS. Does this answer your question? :)

    7. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What do you mean that they're making it difficult? Microsoft has developed Xenon, which is a base platform under which games can be developed so that they will run on both XBox 360 and any Windows XP PC. It's basically extensions to DirectX, which is what the regular XBox used.

    8. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by vasqzr · · Score: 1

      Why is Microsoft making it difficult to write games that run on both PC (Windows XP) and XBox 360?

      One of the primary reasons I use Windows is for games. If game developers stop writing for Windows because they move to XBox 360, then it'll make it even easier for me to go all FreeBSD or Linux or Mac OSX.


      Look at most new games. They come out for GameCube, XBox, and PS2 all at the same time.

    9. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Umm, the original xbox runs a modified Windows kernel. Just one example of it's reliance on it: on a modded xbox you can directly copy the contents of a DVD meant for an xbox onto the harddrive, and then you can launch the game from there and the game has no clue it is being launched from a harddrive and not a disk. This is because it isn't handling the DVD accesses itself, it's just asking the OS to load some file.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    10. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "The way we see it, in five years the PC will mostly be relegated to unwashed hobbyists; and the mainstream user will getting their music from an ipod like device (we have several ipod killers in various stages of development and testing) and their entertainment from media centers and our gaming console."

      And where are they getting their working tools from?

    11. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by clontzman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why is Microsoft making it difficult to write games that run on both PC (Windows XP) and XBox 360?

      Read up on XNA -- they have a new architecture they're pushing that'll do just that.

    12. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way we see it, in five years the PC will mostly be relegated to unwashed hobbyists

      1996 called. They want their marketing hype back.

    13. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which produces two different binaries, but believe me, your game will be shit on a console. If you write for consoles, you have to optimize in ways that most computer, especially Windows desktop, programmers don't ever do.

    14. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by ditangquan · · Score: 1
      In short, people won't flock to Linux from XP; they'll flock from the PC to one of our specialty devices
      I love that. All this time people have been calling Apple products 'proprietary hardware' when its the future of computing. Now look at MS's direction, powerpc and a rigid hardware architecture with little support for third party hardware... gotta use what the 'boss' has designed the software for... I say cool. Less bugs more fun!
    15. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Apple, same source for everything else they get... ;-)

    16. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by acz · · Score: 1

      This is part of the plan... You're gonna switch even faster to
      Mac OS X once it is ported to Xbox 360..

      C'mon a powerpc processor, 3 usb ports, 512MB of ram,
      a fast ATI gfx card with embedded ram... sounds like a
      high end mac mini at half the price.

      I don't know who's gonna win... Apple because the Xbox could popularise "Mac OS X" when everyone run it on the Xbox.

      Or Microsoft who just found a way to compete unfairly with Apple by subsidising mac clones with game sales.

      This is gonna be fun...

    17. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      C'mon a powerpc processor, 3 usb ports, 512MB of ram, a fast ATI gfx card with embedded ram... sounds like a high end mac mini at half the price.

      Please, the Xbox 360 sounds nothing like the Mac Mini. A PowerPC processor? Sounds like the Mac Mini only because it uses the same architecture. The Mac Mini tops out at 1.42GHz, while the Xbox 360 is running 3 symmetrical cores at 3.2GHz each. It's not even in the same ballpark as a Mac Mini.

    18. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by devinoni · · Score: 1

      The XBox 1, uses a stripped down Windows 2000 kernel. If they had used a standard Windows XP kernel, you might end up needing to wait 5 minutes for your XBox to boot.

      The games are XBE (XBox Executables), which are derived from standard EXEs -- minus the cruft that it has gained in the sake of backwards compatibility.

      The XBox 1 uses a modified version of DirectX. Once again, it's a stripped down and enhanced version of the standard DirectX. They took out all the cruft it has gained during the previous development, and added things specific for the hardware.

      And finally, the other reason not use simply use an "off the shelf" OS, is you don't want to make your system look like a cheap PC. People will buy it just to be a PC, and run other things. Since game companies lose money on their hardware, you don't want thousands of people running out and getting it and not buying any games.

      Remember for consoles, you have very specific hardware requirements (they are set in stone). While in a PC, you have a wide range. Developers can't simply concentrate on performance enhancements for a particular configuration.

      Also, XBox 360 development will probably be a much more enjoyable experience than developing for the PS3.

    19. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by acz · · Score: 1

      Didn't I say a "high end" mac mini? I wonder what is the current cost of the Xbox 360 and how much is being subsidised.

    20. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Read up on XNA -- they have a new architecture they're pushing that'll do just that."

      Whatever happened to DNA anyway? I can never keep up with MS APIs, they change faster then the weather in texas.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    21. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is not true in all instances. I don't think microsoft gets money if the game isn't made by them (essentially almost all games).

      Ie : If the game is made by activision, microsoft does not get any money if the game is sold for the pc platform. They do get money if it's sold for the xbox. So it's not "double the money" for them, just the publisher of the game.

    22. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      That's like saying a Porsche sounds like a high end Honda. Yes, they're both cars, but that's where the similarty ends.

    23. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      "The only titles that sell are FPS rehashes."

      Um yeah right. FPS rehashes like the Sims and Rollercoaster Tycoon. In addition top of the crowd RTS games have sold very well (some such as Age of Empires, Starcraft and Warcraft 3 continue to sell years after their release).
      I would also point out the MMORPG market which (outside of Final Fantasy) has no parallel on consoles (expect this to change with the next generation of consoles). World of Warcraft, SW: Galaxies, City of Heroes, Everquest 1 and 2 etc.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    24. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also, XBox 360 development will probably be a much more enjoyable experience than developing for the PS3."

      Developers are already saying what a nightmare 360 development is. Just look at how weak the demos they showed last night.

      That was the 'good' stuff.

      They are all saying that getting decently performing games is a total bitch on the 360. The PS3 will be a dream compared to the development nightmare MS has apparently created.

    25. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      The Xbox is designed so that games can bypass the OS when they need to. This is required to achieve maximum performance. The Dreamcast had a similar design. It had WinCE preinstalled, but many games bypassed it completely.

      In your example, the game is probably using the OS to access the DVD, but bypassing it for the graphics, etc.

    26. Re:Why this strategy from MS? by acz · · Score: 1

      In this particular case the Porsche is gonna be priced lower than the Honda. :)

  13. Power-PC by nashy-nunu · · Score: 0

    Whatever happened to Pentium? Dude, I think I am getting an Apple. [Not siriously I think I am]

  14. Looks Well by CleverNickedName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sleek, curvaceous, white exterior with no messy wires?

    They should have called it "iBox".

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    1. Re:Looks Well by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Funny

      But why does it look strikingly similar to a white version of the Dell desktop I have sitting here on my desk at work?

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:Looks Well by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      no kidding- i was thinking the exact same thing! it looks almost exactly like an optiplex gx270...

    3. Re:Looks Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we live in a three-dimensional universe?

    4. Re:Looks Well by Zangief · · Score: 1

      In fact, when I saw the leaked pictures, I thought they were fakes..."that is just a dell, not a console"

    5. Re:Looks Well by pintomp3 · · Score: 1
  15. Why white? by Powertrip · · Score: 1

    What's with the XBOX black becoming iPod white? Aren't there enough other choices?

    1. Re:Why white? by rokzy · · Score: 1

      ssshhhhhh... this is INNOVATION !

      for MS the biggest problem from the iPod must be that now everyone can see how much they rip off Apple. this isn't like the old days when you'd look at the file properties of a MS FUD PDF and see it was written on a Mac. this is staring you in the face 24/7.

    2. Re:Why white? by NeuroAcid · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm quite upset about this new white look. I finally got all my TV, stereo, entertainment equipment black and I finally got my computer all black too. I guess it's time to switch back to white.

      --
      "I don't need drugs to enjoy this, just to enhance it" - Otto
    3. Re:Why white? by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      What's with the XBOX black becoming iPod white?

      If the XBox starts take on the color of the iPod then that means that it's goinng to be killed off and replaced with cell phones!

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    4. Re:Why white? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      This whole white thing is really starting to get on my nerves. WHY does the PSP need WHITE Earbuds? Or a white wriststrap when the rest of the thing is black?

      I just don't get it.

      When I replaced my three year old iPod the other week the first thing I did was replace the white earbuds, I just hate the white look, and these days when you look around it seems EVERYBODY has an iPod (or at least pretends to have one by using white earbuds).

      I guess white is the new black.....

      MMMhhhh... I wonder if I could spraypaint the console and controllers?

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  16. Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It had better, or it's going to have serious problems convincing people to use it.


    Aside from that, if the BBC site is correct, it seems that device is not a digital media hub at all. It seems rather stupid (to say the least) that they didn't think to make the thing a PVR. The last generation of boxes had the excuse, but a PVR / media station is almost an expectation of something which expects to occupy a permenant space by the TV.


    Still, it'll be interesting to see what Sony produce. If they have sense, they will make it a PVR, and a media jukebox, and a kickass console with backwards compatibility. If it can do all those things when the XBox can't then I don't see they have much to worry about. Better yet if they make it hackable - not so hackable that people can easily pirate games but just enough that people can play around with the box and produce cool things for it.

    1. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by slot32 · · Score: 1

      Regarding making it a PVR, I suspect the problem lies in not being able to record programs AND play games at the same time leading to it's exclusion... Imagine being a developer and having to cap proc utilisation 'just in case the player is recording Suvivor while (s)he's playing' (Which is entirely possible). However, maybe the Sony have an answer? Have to wait and see...

    2. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Marthisdil · · Score: 1

      not so hackable that people can easily pirate games but just enough that people can play around with the box and produce cool things for it.

      You mean, like, so you can pirate games and not pay for them, right? Hehe

    3. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      It's looking like the Xbox will be hackable, but no one is actually going to hack thiers. The new Xbox puts a huge emphasis on Xbox Live, which you can't use if you hack the console. So unless someone finds a way to still use Live on a hacked Xbox, I don't think many people will be crazy about disabling half the functionality of the console.

    4. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by jason_hutchens · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Backwards compatibility just ain't worth the trouble. I mean, seriously, what percentage of people playes PS1 games on their PS2? If you upgrade from your existing console, why not keep your old console around? And if you're new to the console, why would you buy old games? Playing PS1 games on a PS2 is a gimmick. Nothing more.

      And the reason the 360 doesn't function as a PVR is that there's no way to make money from it. Sure, you sell another 360, but you're probably losing money on that in the first place. Instead, Gates will announce a video-on-demand service at E3, you mark my words. Steal Jobs' thunder AND one-up Sony in one fell move.

      Microsoft need one more big announcement to trump Sony at E3. They can't have revealed their hand yet. Likewise, Sony need to out-do Microsoft. And what do they have? Seriously, it feels that Microsoft might win this one.

      Of course, Apple and Sony could band together. Jobs could announce video-on-demand for the iTMS (which is widely predicted) and Sony could announce that PS3 will be able to access the iTMS. Furthermore, Apple could license iPod production to Sony, so they can get out of that market as it plateaus to focus on turning iTMS into their primary revenue stream.

      Idle speculation, nothing more.

    5. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by sriram_2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It *is* backwards compatible. Part of the show talked about being able to download maps for Halo 2

    6. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by sriram_2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The idea is that the XBox hooks up to your Windows Media Center PC which acts as a PVR

    7. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a PVR version can always be released at a premium at a later date. they could've did it for this version as sony did. problem is most people have one already or don't give a shit about them and just want to play the games.

    8. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The next question is why. A PVR is a glorified codec streaming to a hard drive. The next generation XBox could easily fulfill this role. It has a hard drive, internet (for VOD / TV listings) and more than enough CPU to handle the job.

      It makes no sense whatsoever, especially considering that Windows media PCs are as rare and as useful as hens teeth.

    9. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      a PVR doesn't have to have high processor usage. the (maybe older) tivo does hardware encoding/decoding and has something like a 50mhz processor apparently.

    10. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, according to www.xbox.com, this thing will have all of the Windows Media Center stuff built in (which includes PVR), has a 20-GB detachable and upgradable hard drive and supports both sending and receiving streaming music and video.

      As for backwards compat, it's amazing how Sony has spoiled everyone. The only two existing consoles with backwards compat is PS2 and Gameboy.

      Architectural differences are what typically cause backwards compat to be impossible and awkward. Sony accomplished this by reusing the original PS1 CPU as the I/O SPU of the PS2. Their hardware is Frankenstein's monster now, and if PS3 is backwards compat, without an emu, holyshit will it be a bizarre mix of internal hardware. Nintendo attempted backwards compat when they built the SNES, and that is the reason the CPU was so slow and limited despite having been released years after the much faster and capable Genesis.

      XBox 360 is a completely different architecture. It's a triple core 64-bit Power5 CPU with a custom ATI chipset and a half gig of 700 Mhz DDR. XBox was a 733 Mhz Pentium 3 with a custom nVidia chipset and 64 MB of 133 Mhz SDRAM. XBox has no OS, nor concepts of ring protection, so games could access hardware directly. XBox 360 would need to provide an emu that makes that completely and totally seemless, but still fast enough to be playable.

    11. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ask Sony if backwards compatibility is worth the trouble. It's not important how many people play PS1 games now but how many played them around launch time when there is a dearth of titles for the new box but plenty for the old one. It's about continuity - reassuring Mum & Dad that the new console doesn't render Johnny's old games obsolete.


      It's interesting that you mention iTMS. Imagine that Apple produced iPod2 which dumped AAC for something else which is supposedly superior. Would that be a dumb thing or a smart thing to do considering how much people had invested already in AAC?


      As for the PVR, yes there is a way to make money from it. A shitload of money. You sell listings. You bundle them with your XBox Live Platinum subscriptions and make even more money. You sell video & music on demand. You bundle everything into an MSN sub and make even more money.

    12. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by imroy · · Score: 1
      Still, it'll be interesting to see what Sony produce. If they have sense, they will make it a PVR, and a media jukebox

      Nope, since Sony is a member of the RIAA (and MPAA?) they simply can't do anything so bold. Look at all of their "MP3" players that only play the ATRAC format. If Sony did make the PS/3 a PVR, they'd have to lock it up with DRM and proprietary codecs. But MS is already doing that with Window MCE, so you never know. It might have a shot if they tie it in with the PSP and those UMD discs. You could record shows and transfer them to your PSP to whatch on the train/plane trip. But Sony wants to keep (re)writable UMD discs off of the market in a effort to stop piracy, so I guess that idea isn't possible.

    13. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by koko775 · · Score: 1

      Not likely. Apple's profits on music come from selling iPods and not selling the music -- they barely break even there. Also, you seem to forget that some people *don't* have consoles, and that they can't play the good ol' game without paying $150 extra for the good ol' console. Whereas with backwards-compatibility, you get the best of both worlds. And considering that MS loses on each console sold, you'd think that it'd be a wise decision.

    14. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's the thing.. What old Xbox games?

      That's right, I went there.

    15. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Sony is selling those PS2-and-PVR-in-one boxes, right?
      Most likely they'll follow the same scenario this time; release the PS3 then follow-up with a PS3/PVR combination box.
      I for one just hope they'll have the smarts to make the console fit in with ordinary HiFi equipment; simple, rectangular, silver or black front.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    16. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      Just because it's not important to you does not mean it's not important to me. I play old games all the time, and have gone out of my way to get MAME, ZSNES, MESS, and a lot of other emulators running on single system.

      I very much would like to play some of my old XBox games and NOT have keep another system hooked up in what already amounts to a spider's nest of wires behind my television set.

      And yes, I DO play old Playstation 1 games on my Playstation 2. Einhander and R-Type demand it.

      Bryan

    17. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Sony already produces PVRs and MP3 players so I don't see what the issue would be. Even the PSP plays MP3 music. It's not illegal, and assuming they have the brains to tie their box in with some kind of VOD / MOD online store, the vast majority of users would be using it for legitimate, wholesome and extremely profitable reasons anyway.


      If they start enforcing ATRAC or UMD they will have effectively shot themselves in the foot. A user should be able to stick a CD into the machine and rip it complete with track listings. Perhaps its unrealistic to expect it might do DVDs but it can certainly do TV.


      I'm not a fan of Sony by any means BTW (I despise their past insistence on proprietary tech). I just don't like what I see from MS and I'm hoping that Sony have become smarter than that. I should hope they have gained a clue, after the long running and recently conceded debacle concerning their ATRAC walkmans. UMD wouldn't be much use anyway since the picture quality would be atrocious.

    18. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      I recall a recent interview with Bill Gates (the link escapes me) that stated the Xbox is specifically not intended to be a media hub-- the PC running Windows XP Media Center Edition is going to do that.

      Love it or hate it, one could see some benefit in that approach. Firstly, by not having the Xbox be a possible media hub, you can cut costs by not including the neccesary input and circuitry used for video input. Second, Microsoft has only one Media OS to support without the Xbox. (Not that they're doing an incredible job with that, mind you)

      Basically, they're trying not to have conflicting product offerings. They consider the PC to be more flexible for media options, like PVR, audio recording, TV watching, etc. The nature of the Xbox and the MCE OS will cause some overlap, but Microsoft is taking the wiser choice in their eyes by putting the media functions all on something they've been pushing for quite some time. Besides, in that same interview I read, Gates mentioned that the Xbox 360 could have some kind of interface into a PC running Media Center.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    19. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Backwards compatibility just ain't worth the trouble. I mean, seriously, what percentage of people playes PS1 games on their PS2?

      At the time of the PS2-launch, the majority.

      (Of course now, nearing the end of the PS2-lifetime almost nobody)

    20. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      They might still be selling the console at a (near) loss and making money from the games?

      If it's a PVR, I would buy one and never buy any games for it :-)

    21. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No chance that Halo2 won't be ported to the xbox360?

    22. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      You mean, like, so you can pirate games and not pay for them, right? Hehe
      I don't mean to generalize, but the singe most played application on my Xbox is XBMC. I barely play any Xbox games on this console.

      There are compeling reasons out there to mod your console, and playing pirated games is only one of them. I have seen modded Xboxes sold to the unwashed masses for up to 800 U.S. Some of the principal adverts of them are DVD viewing (all regions, PAL/NTSC), viewing of worldwide TV stations and listening of worldwide radio stations.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    23. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by BronxBomber · · Score: 1

      Would you want your entire game library immediately rendered obsolete when you purchased your new console? Sony heard its customers, they made BC happen for PS2. In the end it means more revenue for them, less PS1 game inventories on the shelves, and people are STILL buying PS2 games. Its win/win.

      --
      ...both interiorlly, and exteriorlly.
    24. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      No but you might subscribe for listings. And no doubt MS could try to flog you MSN, video on demand, music and other crap at the same time. They'd make money, even if no one bought a single game, which I'd have a hard time believing.

    25. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by GrassMunk · · Score: 1

      The people who hack these things dont do it and then thing 'OMG, i cant play Halo 2.5 against some 12 year old in alaska' they think 'hey, look what i was able to do'. These are the guys dressed like bandits in videos on the net showing people playing burned diskes etc with a wide open machine. They hack, rarely do they play games.

    26. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like? Google for "hypervisor" and "IBM". Big Blue just loves software freedom - hardware freedom is another thing...

    27. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      The ITMS is never going to be Apple's primary revenue stream. It's just barely holding at the break-even point. It's being held afloat by iPod revenue, which is itself still dwarfed by Apple's computer business.

    28. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by LightningBolt! · · Score: 2, Informative

      It *is* backwards compatible. Part of the show talked about being able to download maps for Halo 2

      Your assertion isn't backed up by your evidence. Here:

      halo2 map = data
      halo2 executable = code
      data != code

      It's much more likely that there's an early version of Halo 2 built for the 360 which (unsuprisingly) works with Halo 2 maps.
      --
      Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
    29. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Robotron23 · · Score: 0

      In my experience, a large percentage of people play PS1 games on their PS2, but mostly just classics. Like with any major industry at its peak/s, there were a lot of classics during the PS1 era, as a seasoned gamer/geek yourself I won't need to name such titles.

      Admittedly classics are few and far between during the 00's, but that does by no mean make the feature a non-starter. Obviously M$ are out for profits, as most people find the idea of backwards compatability really cool when they hear of it, so its a nice selling point.

    30. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      If it were loaded with advertising or required a subscription, I would not buy it. If somebody could create an inexpensive unlocked PVR I'd be thrilled. It shouldn't be impossible.

    31. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, that's not evidence. Halo "2.5" optimized for the 360, with high-definition output and the graphical bells and whistles to go with it, has been speculated about (with hints from Bungie and the MS crew) for quite a while. This will likely be one of the big E3-exclusive official announcements. If it comes bundled with the console itself (another area of speculation), it might just be enough to push people on the fence - especially people riding the fence with HDTVs - over to buying the beast at launch.

      Me, I hope that they manage to get backwards compatibility in there, but I don't consider it a dealbreaker. After all, my Xbox isn't going to quit working because the 360 is released...though it WILL probably quit working because the DVD-ROM fails. :)

    32. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm not sure about the rarity of Windows MCE systems, I'd have to say ours has been pretty useful. We have it hooked up to our TV through the x-box and it works out quite nicely.

      The problem with turning the gaming system into a PVR is that you need an absurdly huge HDD to make it remotely useful, which would bump the price quite a bit. From what I've read, the HDD will be removable on the 360, so maybe you'll be able to buy a lrger HDD later that includes PVR abilities, but I don't think they would want to jack the release price that much for such functionality. If I recall, TiVo's are relatively simple machines relativly speaking, but still cost a nice chunk of change, so really, why would you expect something like this for free.

    33. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by mink · · Score: 1

      "It's a triple core 64-bit Power5 CPU"

      I highly doubt it, I mean elements of what you say are true, but the details are important.
      Are they really 64 bit or 32 bit?
      Do they do in order or out of order execution?
      Is it just like all other POWER5 or is it somehow differnt in it'd design (I hear it has differnt cache and other things).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    34. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your stupid.
      I still play ps1 games..
      Board Games: Top Shop, Striker 1945, etc.

      Your the same guy who would give me the lecture about playing n64 games on your modded xbox. See the troll guide above but reverse it.

      Then read the comment that follows this, it's about being able to retain your current collection while you develop a new collection. I have 65 games, I don't want to just 'give them all up' cause I got a new console. I may give them up over time, and that's the point.

    35. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      It seems rather stupid that you are faulting MS for not making Xbox 360 a PVR machine.

      For Xbox to become a PVR, you will need 2 HDTV tuners, 2 SD tuners (probably a same card that will do all), and at least 160GB in hard drive (anything less is a waste of time for HDTV PVR).

      Do you even have any idea how much that would add to the base price???

      As it is Xbox price is going to be closer to $500 than $200 and you need to be close to $200 for a mass adoption.

      Basically, you are arguing that Xbox should have made the machine hundreds of dollars more expensive (losing millions of customers), so that it can satisfy few thousand customers.

      Yeah, that makes sense.

      And no, Sony is not going to make PS3 a PVR - they are not that stupid.

      P.S. As it is, Xbox360 will be a MCE Extender. Which means, as long as you have an MCE box at home, you can use Xbox360 just like a PVR. Pretty neat stuff (without adding too much cost)!

    36. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Pengunea · · Score: 1

      That's awefully odd idle speculation and I can't really see the value in removing backwards compatibility as an option. It seems to be less like "saving money by not looking backwards" and more like "blocking off all old formats to force people to buy remakes".

      I purchased both my PS2 and GBA unit FOR their backwards compatibility because I have a large pre-existing library of Gameboy and PS1 games that I still enjoy playing on a regular basis. The value I place on the games I own was not negated when these new consoles came out. In fact the personal value of my games for the two systems was increased.

      The GBA has a much nicer screen on it than my original toasterish greenscreen-style Gameboy. The PS2 added new functionality and didn't have the problems caused by wear and tear that my PS1 had. Essentially in both cases I was able to replace my existing worn hardware with fresh hardware that provided new features that I wanted.

      As an example of a format that is only playable on one system because I never purchased the re-release of the SNES unit I never got a replacement for my existing hardware. I need to tread lightly with my SNES when I want to play with the real console. Even though it's in excellent condition the rarity of a fresh, unused SNES console makes preserving the existing console I have all that more important.

      --
      Starkle, starkle, little twink.
    37. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by dkone · · Score: 1

      Come on, you must be trolling??? The consoles have HD signals. Most TV's only have 2 HD inputs. 1 for the HD TV signal, 1 for your console. if you have 2 consoles then what? AB switch?

      Then what about all the money spent on the original Xbox games? the games still kick ass, and they get played alot.

    38. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      It doesn't need tuners, at least in Europe. Scart ensures that any box in the chain gets a video signal. And as the XBox is touting an Eye-Toy style device, it clearly has the ability to accept an incoming video signal from elsewhere too.


      Therefore I reject that argument. Even if a tuner were a necessary add-on, it would certainly be cheaper than what the current blurb leads me to expect I would need for a PVR - a Windows media PC. Having to stream from a PC to an XBox is quite obviously an exercise in pointlessness. No one in their right mind is going to leave a PC on, on the off-chance that they might want to record a programme from their main TV on it. No one is even going to have their DirecTV / Sky box plumbed into their decoder *and* PC in the first place.


      And no the machine wouldn't be more expensive. As I said, most EU users would be fine, and US users might at most have to fork out for a supplemental tuner. More likely they'd just attach the XBox between their DirecTV box and their TV. It's certainly far, far cheaper than some Windows media box + network, that's for sure.


      As for PS/3, I have no idea what it will offer. But a PVR is a screamingly obvious feature and they don't have a Windows media albatross hanging around their neck. So I hope they see some sense and just offer a PVR. For me it would be a compelling feature. PVRs are in themselves several hundred euros. A game console that offered it out of the box would be an instant winner.

    39. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      As an addendum, for the EU market; I'd say Sony could even build a PS/3 with a Satellite tuner built-in. Sony already do various tuners, e.g. for Sky. A console that could do what Sky+ does (Sky+ is a PVR) and be a top-notch console would be a killer device as far as I'm concerned.

    40. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I have a PS2 and 80% of the stuff I play are my PS1 games. Most of my friends are the same. If I can eliminate more "clutter" around my TV, the better. I don't want a Gamecube, XBox, PS2, PS1, SNES, NES, etc all cluttering up my living room. That's why I have decided on 1 gaming platform: The PS2, because I can leverage my decent PS1 library (Castlevania: Symphony of the Night, Final Fantasy, Silhouette Mirage) with newer games (Megami Tensei: Nocturne, FF X, Disgaia, etc) and only have system. I may go ahead and pick up a new slim-line PS2, to save even more space.

      And one of the reasons I love my GBA SP is that I can still play old GB games, as well. Once someone gets emulation going on a PSP, I'll probably move to that for the screen. :)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    41. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gates will announce a video-on-demand service at E3, you mark my words.

      Video slash games.

    42. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1
      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    43. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1
      First, the European market never drives the game console design. Japanese and US market does.

      If the incoming signal is coming through USB, then yes you can view, but that ain't a PVR. That is a capture device. If you don't know the difference, then you need to read up.

      And if you have not noticed, XBox is a HD device. HD signals are HUGE (7GB/Hour). And that is not going to fit in the puny USB (or SCART) interface. And if you are talking about SD - (WHO CARES???!!).

      The HDTV tuners sell for $150. You can reject all you want. But that is the reality. Even if you get a volume discount, it is going to add at least $75/each to the cost of the Xbox.

      There is a reason why HD PVR boxes are selling for $1000. You are basically asking for the same capabilities AND 1 trillion calculation/sec capability for less than half than that.

      Well, we can all dream, but that doesn't me you are going to get it.

      Having to stream from a PC to an XBox is quite obviously an exercise in pointlessness. No one in their right mind is going to leave a PC on, on the off-chance that they might want to record a programme from their main TV on it.

      You have never seen a PVR or HTPC have you? I have a MCE box, it is FREAKIN GREAT! It is on ALL THE TIME! Why? Because YOU NEVER KNOW WHEN YOU ARE GOING TO RECORD!!! Tivo works the same way. It never is turned off. And when you have a MCE Extender, it can access the recorded files just like any network PC's can.

      It is PATENTLY obvious that you know NOTHING about PVR or HTPC. Maybe you should buy one and live with it for awhile before asking for the capabilities on the Xbox.

      C'mon, based on your post, PVR's must only cost 20 Euros. Go ahead, splurge a little...

    44. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      That's not inexpensive :-)

    45. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by geekmule · · Score: 1

      because I can leverage my decent PS1 library (Castlevania: Symphony of the Night, Final Fantasy, Silhouette Mirage) with newer games (Megami Tensei: Nocturne, FF X, Disgaia, etc) and only have system.

      Is Disgaea the best freaking game ever or what?

      But I digress: Actually clutter is one of the reasons I probably won't get an XBOX 360 if they don't offer backward compatibility. Crap, the first Xbox was big and bulky enough! I don't want two of them filling up my entertainment system. Sony and Nintendo have already guaranteed backward compatibility for their next-gen systems.

      And speaking of Sony and Nintendo, from the info that's been leaked so far, their systems seem like they're going to truly 'next generation' stuff, whereas the 360 seems like an small incremental nudge in speed and power.

    46. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by jason_hutchens · · Score: 1

      Very true. Backwards compatibility helps when you're purpose is to get people to upgrade to the new console. But it is tough to implement, and Microsoft doesn't do backwards compatibility anymore...

      Another solution is to release re-compiled versions of XBox games on the 360. So perhaps you'll be able to swap your copy of Halo for a 360 version at launch.

      Microsoft don't want folks using their 360 to timeshift TV. Music and video on demand, sure.

    47. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      people playes PS1 games on their PS2

      Well, anybody who likes good RPGs for one (this being a not insignificant proportion of the gaming population, especially in Japan). I know that's why I still play ps1 games.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    48. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Now I know you're being dense or contrary. I reckon both. For most setups a PVR doesn't need a tuner - the one in your existing stb is sufficient. My sat box has a tuner as I'm sure your's does. It would have been fairly straightforward to accept an HDCP input as well as output and daisy chain the signal via XBox. I am also sure that a company with Microsoft's clout could produce an HDCP to lan specification too. Indeed, that is more or less what streaming from a Windows media player is tantamount to.


      As for the Windows media comment, I can see that flew by you as well. At the announce spec, the XBox is more than capable of being a PVR on its own, and an MP3 player and a media jukebox. That some insist that you can stream from a Windows media PC shows just shows how crippled and un-"digital hub"-like this thing really is. It's not a media hub so much as a crippled terminal for Windows media PCs.


      Stop being an apologist for them and admit they blew it. It doesn't mean that Sony will get it right, but MS screwed up first.

    49. Re:Does it run old X-Box games? by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      You just don't get it, do you?

      Capture device is NOT a PVR!!!

      If you do not have tuner, you are not a PVR, you are just a capture device. Using an external tuner is clunky and uneven experience at best, and setup is a bitch.

      But then again, you know NOTHING about PVR - for GOD sakes, you think PVR's don't even stay on all the time!!!

      Do yourself a FAVOR, get a freaking Tivo box. It is NOT that expensive. Get it. Use it.

      AFTER you have used it for awhile, get back to me.

      Otherwise, you are just shooting off your ass about a subject you have no idea about.

  17. emulation by musikit · · Score: 1

    so if someone writes an xbox 360 emulator for the PC and i'm running it though Virtual PC on Mac how much slower can i expect it to be?

    1. Re:emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy! Since it's on a Mac, it will run better! Right?

  18. Re:30 minutes? Actually its an infomercial. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    An informercial made to look like MTV. Note that there were no disclaimers stating this was advertising. It was not microsoft present xbox, it was MTV presents xbox.

  19. xbox 360 design...uninspired by distantbody · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The designers were very motivated, but they lacked the tallent and high standards to make something truly visually exceptional. The design concept: "inhaling", this sounds like a high school design project. I cant knock them on the hardware front, but its just very visually uninspired (perhaps to motivate clip-on-cover sales?). The consoles exterior belies its future sigificance, which is a bit disappointing. Have a squiz at Inhabitat for a look at the future of design.

    On a different note, congratulations to the xbox 360 marketing team, who pulled out all the stops: constant "leaks" heading up to the launch, the first next-gen console shown off, launched on TV, by a pop show, and by celeberities! Not to mention the whole colony buisness. Full marks Microsoft marketing team.

    1. Re:xbox 360 design...uninspired by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      WTF are you babbling about. Are you seriously trying to suggest that an object with clean, uncluttered lines and silver/white colour would not fit in with the clean uncluttered lines and very light colours in the link you posted?

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:xbox 360 design...uninspired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have an apartment that looks like that, all of your electronics are going to be safely hidden out of sight anyway.

    3. Re:xbox 360 design...uninspired by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      I am completely amused at people that complain about the visual design of the new XBox. It's a box that hangs out under your TV, who gives a shit if the design is boring? And where were these people when Sony introduced this ugly ass thing?

      I can't believe I let myself get dragged into this ridiculous discussion.

    4. Re:xbox 360 design...uninspired by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      While I disagree with your point about the Xbox design I have to say that site is pretty sweet... I about wet myself when I saw the Tetris shelves! Kudos.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    5. Re:xbox 360 design...uninspired by dogbowl · · Score: 1

      The xbox360 design is nothing more than a Dell OptiPlex case http://www.interlink.ru/pic/888296.jpg/
      and an Apple pippin controller http://www.macgeek.org/museum/pippin/images/Pippin Controller.jpg/.

      The only thing the controller is missing are the analogue joysticks .. and thats only because Nintendo hadn't invinted them yet back when the pippin came out!

      --

      These pretzels are making me thirsty.
    6. Re:xbox 360 design...uninspired by HumanTorch · · Score: 1

      1. The designs on that site have exactly _what_ to do with electronic game consoles, or any functionally complex device whatsoever? Where's the next generation washing machine design? Is a functionally complex device even the proper medium for artistic expression? 2. Not applicable to a mass market, regardless.

    7. Re:xbox 360 design...uninspired by NCraig · · Score: 1
      Have a squiz at Inhabitat for a look at the future of design.


      Ahh, the future: war, pestilence, and incredibly ugly furniture.
  20. Re:But.I have a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I want to know is, if we can get Linux to run on it, can we get Mac OSX to run on it using Mac-on-Linux? Obviously Mac OSX isn't going to run by itself, but Linux can surely be made to run on the Xbox 360's PowerPC processors, and then allow Mac OSX to run on that, kinda like how that one person loded Debian on an m68k and then got Mac OSX running on top of that.

  21. Re:But.- PC Next by aacool · · Score: 1

    This could be called "PC Next" - see this review of the XBox 360 for some notes I hope PC Gaming prices drop

  22. Free Jeff Minter VLM with every XBox 360 sold by Kanon · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.llamasoft.co.uk/neon-screenshots.php

    Jeff Minter code in millions of households soon :)

    1. Re:Free Jeff Minter VLM with every XBox 360 sold by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

      Yes but wheres the damned CAMELS??!!

  23. Complete waste by ThePolkapunk · · Score: 1

    The XBOX special provided almost no new information about the XBOX. They still haven't announced a release date, they still haven't confirmed or denied backwards compatability, and there's still no mention of the price. Why couldn't they give us information instead of a stupid Gen-X hype machine?

    --
    Dear diary: Today I stuffed some dolls full of dead rats I put in the blender.
    1. Re:Complete waste by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      Release date: Unofficial (rumored) release in November 2005.

      Backwards Compatibillity: It sounds like they still don't know themselves, they are working on it.

      Price: You probably don't want to know. ;)

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Good start by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So far, the specs look pretty good. MS is probably allowing it to be a DVD player out of the box without the annoying "remote control must be there". Surprisingly, it still looks pretty modible - you know that people will be dying to make it into a Linux box first chance they get (and with a removable hard drive, even easier to switch between systems and use those USB peripherals), so we'll have to see what anti-mod abilities it includes.

    The #1 question still is: backwards compatibility. At these specs, there's no reason why a hardware emulator couldn't emulate an older Xbox. And with the Xbox 1 only 4 years old, I believe that backwards compatibility will be a big deal - if not a bigger deal than the other systems. It's the price between $300 - $400 with some games on launch day (of which, if history is a judge from the PS2, Xbox 1, and Gamecube launch, one of those games is worth having, and 6 months afterwards the other "killer apps" show up), or having a good library including the all important Halo 1 and 2.

    Enough to make me buy on launch day? No (but then again, with the current 3 consoles I own plus the GBA and PSP, I have too many games anyway), but we'll have to see how it does the next time out. They've fixed a lot of my previous annoyances with the Xbox 1 (the USB system should let me plug in a keyboard to enter in my own music track information - a pain and a half with the Xbox 1 using a controller, and the free basic Live will bring in people who, like myself, are too damn cheap to pay the $60 or so a year to get onto Live, especially considering how little I play online these days. Three kids, wife, blah, blah, blah.)

    But it's a good showing. I'll be curious to see how the PS3 and Nintendo Revolution respond. (Psst: Nintendo, DVD movies play out of the box. It's reason #1 why you're tied in second place worldwide with the Xbox.)

    1. Re:Good start by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative
      At these specs, there's no reason why a hardware emulator couldn't emulate an older Xbox.

      The problem is with nVidia, and it's not technical but legal. This is an older article describing some of the problems. While some of the hardware challenges have been overcome, the nVidia problem remains.

      It was widely believed, however, that Microsoft had retained a team of hardware emulation experts to work on the problem - although concerns over the viability of such an endeavour were voiced by some experts, especially regarding the company's ability to emulate the functions of the graphics unit in the Xbox without violating NVIDIA's intellectual property rights.

      IIRC nVidia has patents on some GPU algorithms in their chipsets that the Xbox used. ATI can't simply copy them without permission, and nVidia is unlikely to give them permission. So the problem is that the Xbox 360 GPU will not respond correctly to an Xbox 1 game. Technically Xbox 360 could emulate the functions before passing commands to the ATI GPU, but it's quite a technical challenge to do this.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:Good start by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      I can't !@#$%^ find the article now, but I read one Xbo360 piece which claimed -claimed- that MS was saying there would be 200 (two HUNDRED) games available by the end of 2005, so basically 200 launch titles.

      LMAO

      Impossible. There aren't THAT many different kinds of games, the developers are still working on getting dev kits much less learning how to make games with them, there aren't that many games in the pipeline, and even if there were, releasing 200 of them would drain out every game for years.

      What if the answer is backward compatibility? Even if they manage to do it, there aren't 200 Xbox I games still in production. I don't know where the hell they're gonna get 200 games between now and the end of the year. I just don't see it.

      Wait. They didn't say they'd be GOOD games. Mother Truckers 2, here we come!

      It's the price between $300 - $400 with some games on launch day (of which, if history is a judge from the PS2, Xbox 1, and Gamecube launch, one of those games is worth having, and 6 months afterwards the other "killer apps" show up), or having a good library including the all important Halo 1 and 2.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    3. Re:Good start by dema · · Score: 1

      MS is probably allowing it to be a DVD player out of the box without the annoying "remote control must be there".

      What exactly makes you think that? Why wouldn't MS want you to dish out another $50+ for DVD capability?

    4. Re:Good start by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      The #1 question still is: backwards compatibility.

      The #1 question for you is backwards compatibility. There are plenty of people (me included) who don't give a shit about backwards compatibility. Either 1) they don't own an XBox, so have no Xbox games to play; or 2) they do have an XBox, so if they wanted to play an XBox games (as opposed to XBox 360), they'll use the machine they already own.

    5. Re:Good start by Niobium-41 · · Score: 1

      Technically Xbox 360 could emulate the functions before passing commands to the ATI GPU, but it's quite a technical challenge to do this.

      Why is it so much of a technical challenge? Wouldn't this the same thing as all the Glidewrappers that came out so long ago? Just a simple layer that translated the 3DFX glide calls to the corrisponding Direct3D calls, the same thing could apply here, then ATI wouldn't have to know anything about the NVidia hardware as Microsoft would be the one writing the layer.

    6. Re:Good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MS is probably allowing it to be a DVD player out of the box without the annoying "remote control must be there".

      I've heard a number of reasons why you have to buy the separate remote to watch DVD movies on XBox.

      The only reason that's made sense to me is that any device that plays CSS encrypted movies must pay a license fee to the DVD mafia^H^H^H^H^H consortium. So Microsoft saves about $10 per unit by selling a separate remote to unlock the decryption algorithm, which also explains why the DVD remote is so expense, about $10 of the cost goes to the license fee.

    7. Re:Good start by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft should threaten to kick them out of DirectX if they don't comply, that would pretty much kick their ass.

  26. Re:30 minutes? Actually its an infomercial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The entire premise of MTV is to show informercials (aka music videos).

  27. boy did it suck! by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Was I the only one who was completely underwhelmed by the 30 minute commercial with commercials? Every new generation of consoles prior to this has been a big leap forward from the previous one. There was hardly any in-game footage shown, but what I saw looked more evolutionary than revolutionary. What did Perfect Dark Zero have that you can't get on Halo 2 with the HD cables for the Xbox? "Fully destructable objects"? (did anyone else catch that? wtf?)

    I have a feeling that Microsoft has screwed up pretty bad with this not being backward compatible- unless they're going to have dual-sytem games, it's going to split their userbase and the developers will not know which unit to design for. People were still releasing games for the PS1 long after the PS2 came out, but they could get away with it because the PS2 was backward compatible.

    Here's hoping it's an abysmal flop.

    1. Re:boy did it suck! by wvitXpert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As you get closer and closer to photo-realism the size of the leaps gets smaller. Think about the amount of time game developers would have to spend just to take full advantage of the graphics (forgetting about gameplay). It could take years to develop games that fully show off the graphics power of the next-gen consoles. All we saw on MTV were early renders of alpha games. I expect them to look a bit better on release, but still you can only get so realistic.

    2. Re:boy did it suck! by kidgenius · · Score: 4, Informative

      You know, I saw the Perfect Dark pics and was rather underimpressed as well. But, if you looked closely, you could tell it was unfinished. Most of the surfaces had no textures on them. They only had a simple, flat, single color applied to all the surfaces. So, that's why it looked like a hybrid PS1/PS2 quality game. If you look at the ghost recon pics though, they are rather impressive. Personally, I'm waiting for the PS3 because I enjoy Gran Turismo, Final Fantasy, and Metal Gear Solid (which usually comes out first on Sony)

    3. Re:boy did it suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not really true. the last generation despite all the hype wasn't really a big leap forward over the previous generation. the NES/SNES jump also wasn't really so big either when you take in the entire field at the time including the PC-Engine and Genesis. if you lump the PC-Engine into the NES generation, then the SNES wasn't such a big jump. it had hardware rotation and scaling. the PC-Engine was doing wave sampled instruments and sound back in 88 along with 512/484 colors.

      MS still hasn't said for sure whether or not it will be backwards compatible, but it looks as if they're still working on making it work that way. "Microsoft is aiming for what is called backwards compatibility but is facing technical difficulties." according to this. and the our colony video apparently show it running current xbox games. at least according to xbox-scene.

    4. Re:boy did it suck! by wift · · Score: 1

      It sucked hard and long. I like and want the 360 but I couldn't take the MTV crap for long. I didn't find one friend who liked it. The ourcolony.net video was what this MTV crapola fest should have been.

      --
      ....... Thus ends my attempt at wit or whatever
    5. Re:boy did it suck! by radish · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that Microsoft has screwed up pretty bad with this not being backward compatible

      It hasn't yet been confirmed whether or not it will be backwards compatible. Last tumor I heard was "they're trying. but can't be sure yet". We'll have to wait a while to find out I think.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:boy did it suck! by chromaphobic · · Score: 2

      Underwhelmed is a perfect description of my feelings towards the XBox 360. I watched the videos and looked at the screenshots and was filled with an overwhelming sense of "Meh" and a shrugging of the shoulders.

      Previous generations of consoles almost always wowed me from the first moment, this just makes me want to go take a nap.

    7. Re:boy did it suck! by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

      As a long-time ATi fan, I'm happy that the Xbox 360 uses an ATi GPU, but it looks like its going to shoot them in the foot since apparently console GPUs don't do things in any kind of standard way like PC GPUs do.

    8. Re:boy did it suck! by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion preview? In the words of Paris Hilton: that's hot.

      Yes, I just slapped myself...

    9. Re:boy did it suck! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      It was terrible.
      I was expecting nice, unreal engine 3 type renders, but instead I got footage that looked worse than HL2, and much worse than DOOM3.
      Sure, it'll be a few years for games to mature into the platform, but the least Microsoft could have done is show some nice renders.
      Pfft...
      I think I'll just wait for the PS3, and let others rave about the mediocre Xbox Circle...

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    10. Re:boy did it suck! by obsol33t · · Score: 1

      I only could bear to watch a few minutes of that stimulation overload infomercial, it truly was disgusting. My favorite part of the event (that I saw) was the conversation between a microsoft rep and some Viacom whore celebrity regarding the physical design of the new console. I sure am glad that the sleek new design of the xbox360 will please my baby momma!

    11. Re:boy did it suck! by jafac · · Score: 1

      . . . better still, is how Cringely thinks that xBox360 is going to end up cannibalizing Microsoft's OEM sales for home PC's (it's going to play games, video, music, and surf the net - so home users need a pc why, exactly?)

      I don't necessarily agree with Cringely on this one - but he has been known to be correct from time to time. /c3p0_voice.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:boy did it suck! by jafac · · Score: 1



      It's hard to tell, as a user of Microsoft's Virtual PC on a dual-2ghz G5; Windows XP is damn slow. Almost unusably slow. On the other hand, when I use it to run RDP connections to my work computer, that machine is much more responsive through RDP, over a network, than the XP system that's hosting it. (wierd). In fact, some folks have figured out how to host the VPC WinXP RDP session to a local instance of the Mac version of the RDP client, (I was unable to get that to work), and they say it's faster. So maybe there's some wierd display bottleneck built into VPC7 for the Mac, that won't be present in the emulator they build for xBox360. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:boy did it suck! by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      yeah, stimulation overload is right- i don't think three seconds went by in the entire show without a cut. talk about headache-inducing...

    14. Re:boy did it suck! by chudgoo · · Score: 1

      Backwards compatibility is a gimmick at best. Can you honestly tell me that you have played any PSone game on your PS2 in the last 4 years? (aside from the occassional retro-binge) My GBA has played exactly ONE Gameboy game in it's time with me. (Tetris)

      Adding an expensive and technically demanding (legally and otherwise) feature to an already expensive box is dumb, and given that it's a feature hardly anyone aside from Microsoft's marketing department will actually USE is completely asinine.

      Tangent! : "Fully destructable objects"?? yeah right. People would spend all their time shooting at buildings and having demolition competetions (who can level the hotel the fastest or with the fewest rockets)

      I especially liked how they edited it to look as though the gamer was speaking in another language while they showed clips of the developers looking glazed over!

      Cut to "Will it be cool?" "YEAH!" which had that Mtv pseudo-hipster-vomit written all over it. It is so AWESOME to -not- know things! Woooooooo!

    15. Re:boy did it suck! by moffatt · · Score: 1

      Backwards compatibility is not a gimmick. It's necessary in the current console market. In the past year, my PS2 has played the following PSone games: Final Fantasy 8,Breath of Fire 3, Metal Gear Solid, Vandal Hearts, Suikoden, and Lunar 1 & Lunar 2. They weren't for simple nostalgia, but because the games were fun, and I hadn't played them all.

      In the next set of consoles that will be coming out, I'm gonna personally buy the system that plays the games I currently have and the ones that I will want.That system could be Nintendo's, Microsoft's, or Sony's, which ever system does it.

    16. Re:boy did it suck! by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      Funny how you're the only higly mod post to point this out and you're not even a 5.

      I tuned in to see graphics of games. I saw precious little of that. Who cares how many CPUs it has or how some guys modded an original Xbox or how you can use it to run a model united nations?

      I wanted to see what this thing is capable of. I saw nothing that impressed me except the Need for Speed game and the NFL game - and even that NFL game wasn't too terribly impressive. Everything else looked like it could run on a current Xbox or even a PS2.

      It was quiet sad, really. If they had only just done a cinescape show (G4 show with nothing but in-game footage) I wouldn't have been so underwhelmed.

    17. Re:boy did it suck! by chudgoo · · Score: 1

      Ahh...predictable responses... So tell me what happened to your PlayStation... You know, PSone. The actual hardware you used to play these games on. Did it go missing? Did it explode? Both?! You obviously still have the hardware around but for one reason or another do not have it hooked up. You fail to present a compelling case for backwards compatibility by merely running off a list of games in pursuit of self-gratification. The SNES wasn't a failure because it wasn't compatible with the NES games. People grumbled about it at first but then got lost in love with all the new SNES games and came to the realization that it didn't matter anyway because they still had a NES to play NES games on.

    18. Re:boy did it suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahbut the folks playing Morrowind on the Xbox have basically been burned, because they can't mod it. Morrowind has hundreds of mods for it, and many of them add quite a bit of gameplay, to say nothing of some very nice updated graphics.

      I know the xbox360's supposed to have ubiquitous networking, but I still don't see Oblivion on the xbox supporting third party mods.

    19. Re:boy did it suck! by geekmule · · Score: 1

      Don't know about his answer, but mine is: I freakin' sold it! Why keep two consoles? There's always some holdout who's been waiting for the next gen console to come out so the he can buy the old one really cheap.

    20. Re:boy did it suck! by OK+PC · · Score: 0

      The whole show was so showy and americanised it made me want to be sick! I felt really sorry for the men from rare having to be interviewed by a complete tool

      --
      Did you get that thing I sent ya?
    21. Re:boy did it suck! by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

      Actually the marketing word they used is "inhale".

    22. Re:boy did it suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They keep talking about "customizing it", and how you can actually download game demos through Xbox Live Silver (free). I doubt they'd pass up modding.

  28. Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by xtracto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, it seems it the Xbox 360 is the Family All In One multimedia station MS promised it will be...

    Unfrotunately, if every game is Live aware, I am affraid developers will tend to concentrate in the Live gameplay while leaving us the poor unfortunate guys that do not have high speed internet or WiFi (does it comes with an ethernet adaptor?) with 1/3 of the "experience"...

    I certainly will wait until Nintendo and Playstation release their consoles to make a choice... (as I do not have the money to buy the 3 of them... or even 2)

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      Not to mention those of us who do have high speed internet connections but prefer to just casually play offline single player games at our leisure.

      The last online game I played was Q3A. I haven't had the time, motivation or desire to ever allow myself to get that hooked with online competition again.

    2. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1
      Unfrotunately, if every game is Live aware, I am affraid developers will tend to concentrate in the Live gameplay while leaving us the poor unfortunate guys that do not have high speed internet or WiFi (does it comes with an ethernet adaptor?) with 1/3 of the "experience"...
      I haven't seen any info on it, but I'm hoping/guessing the internet hookup will be wireless. This is what stopped me from getting the whole Live thing. Dragging ethernet cables through my living room is not something I'd want to do.
    3. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      It has an RJ45 plug-in (ethernet) on the back, the wireless adapter (802.11a,b,g) costs extra.

    4. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by BewireNomali · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i think that's the point though. they're hedging their bets on the fact that the future of gaming in online, for a number of reasons.

      first and foremost - the revenue stream from an online service allows them to sell the unit itself at a justifiable loss if they can demonstrate a consistent percentage of owner uptake to the online service.

      the second thing about consoles that has yet to become a big problem is piracy. As more sophisticated methods of console piracy emerge, serious dents in the revenue stream will be made, as microsoft undoubtedly shares in revenues of games distributed on its console, again to offset the loss from the sale of the unit. So the other reason to hedge bets on online gaming is that the future of gaming plans to be SERVER SIDE - centrally distributed gaming. You'll log on to a service and have to pay for your game which is centrally housed.

      No more disc for you to copy for your cool friends so they can play on their modded x-box. in fact, they're telling you to mod your x-box all you like... if you can't get free games, they couldn't care less.

      if you don't think that's important, look at how the gamecube suffered because it refused to consider the implications of the future, i.e. dvd playback. Sony, ironically, has catchup to do. By not uniting developers on one platform for online gaming (something they're going to have to do eventually) they didn't have the foresight to realize that gaming, like all things, is something most folks like to do together. X-box live is gonna give people a place to do that (especially because of the x-box silver service, which is a FREE tier of x-box live).

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    5. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by Kurrelgyre · · Score: 1

      Live aware doesn't mean it has online play, only that you can sign in so that your Friends can page you with requests to join a game they're playing online.

    6. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Money??? Hell, I personally don't have the TIME to play all three of them. I'm a subscriber to World of Warcraft (and I love it to death), but I just can't find enough personal time to devote to playing games anymore.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can exchange that time you spend on those sensless news pages at the Internet...
      br.
      That way you might get plenty of time to play and who knows, maybe even work :oP

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    8. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by D4MO · · Score: 1
      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    9. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by Mephie · · Score: 1

      Dude, I couldn't agree more. I have no desire to play games online.

    10. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about developers- Xbox Live subscribers are a small fraction of the Xbox market (I think there are 1.5 to 2 million of them, compared to 17 million Xboxes sold), and the Xbox 360 will likely see numbers like this too. The offline-only market segment is still going to be important for a long time.

    11. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by Babbster · · Score: 1

      The Xbox 360 has an ethernet port (just like the Xbox) and they're calling it "WiFi ready." That most likely means that you'll have to hook a USB 802.11 adapter to one of the three USB 2.0 ports to get your wireless on - fortunately, such adapters have gotten to be dirt cheap (CompUSA has an 802.11g model on sale for $19.99, as one example).

    12. Re:Every game in the Xbox 360 is Live aware... by fikx · · Score: 1

      Does "Live Aware" mean online playable? I hadn't seen that part of the info yet,
      but I thought that they were going to have your presense tracked the same way no matter what you were doing on the box (playing games, watching DVD's, chatting, etc.) Have they changed that? If I remember right, some of the current crop of Live games are "Live aware" but didn't have an online mode....it was just so they could download new content...The new one was susposed to allow that and a lot more.

      --
      AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  29. And the winner is... by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Well lets face it IBM. If XBox 360 wins (anyone noticed that you do 360 to end up back in the same place?) then its IBM processors at the core. If its PS3, then its... IBM processors at the core.

    All those box numbers, all that volume, all those cheap servers.

    XBox or PS3, doesn't matter as Intel lose.

    (But please let it be PS3 that wins as its actually innovative rather than a re-hash of off the shelf stuff and (as ever with MS) no R&D).

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:And the winner is... by wvitXpert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In what way is the PS3 inovative? I haven't heard anything but cell processor this, cell processor that... let me guess, it can finally render toy-story quality graphics right?

    2. Re:And the winner is... by sibtrag · · Score: 0

      Did you notice the license plate at about 3:49 in the Our Colony video? Looks like PS3KO to me. Just a subtle dig at the expected competition.

    3. Re:And the winner is... by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I don't want any one system to win. I like the competition between the companies forcing them to really push out decent games (hopefully.) And truthfully, I'll trust an Xbox on release date more than a PS# on release date. Both the PS1 and PS2 had such serious release issues (I worked at a video game retailer at the time of the PS2 release, and saw more defective units than any other console I've ever dealt with!)

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    4. Re:And the winner is... by sriram_2001 · · Score: 1

      No R&D? Ever heard of research.microsoft.com? Or the fact that they have the second largest research budget in the world (behind a pharmaceutical company)

    5. Re:And the winner is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's not much for Intel to lose in the console market. I don't think anyone thought of it as anything other than an unusual exception that the original XBox used an Intel CPU.

      Performance demands on consoles seem to be going up, and Intel is expensive if you want performance.

    6. Re:And the winner is... by jeffgeno · · Score: 1

      Before the current X-Box no console ever had an Intel CPU. I don't think they care much about the market.

    7. Re:And the winner is... by MosesJones · · Score: 1


      All depends on how you account the R&D, what has microsoft R&D actually created in comparison with IBM, AT&T (of old), Xerox etc. A whole lot of cash, bugger all actual inovation.

      In the last 10 years how many of the "big" inventions have Microsoft created for this budget. Zero, zip, nada, not a single sausage. In the 1970s Xerox managed to invent windowing operating systems, ethernet, laser printers, wirelesss networking (using lasers though) and a whole heap of other things. IBM have done a huge amount with transactional processing, system availability, domaining, messaging, brokerage and lots of other bits.

      Microsoft has given us clippy. I don't care how much quantity they have, they have bugger all R&D quality.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    8. Re:And the winner is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drop into MSR Beijing and see what they have to offer some time. Or you could not, and just continue on like you actually know what you're talking about.

    9. Re:And the winner is... by Inebrius · · Score: 1

      As much as new technology and R&D is great, I am looking for better integration of current technology.

      It looks like the XBOX 360 has the potential for this. I've looked for a device I can plug into my home theater system that will do gaming, serve up music, movies, pictures, etc.

      If they include a way to stream movies from my windows PC to the XBOX with reasonable quality, I might just buy a couple of 250-400 GB drives and rip all my movies to the PC.

      If the new XBOX makes it easy to add on extra peripherals (like keyboard and mouse), it will be much more valuable than just a console.

      And I may buy more games for the XBOX than I do for the PC, if the interface is more diverse and the graphics are excellent on HDTV.

      I'd love to see technology move forward and improve, but I would also like to see us take advantage of the existing technology and make it user friendly for the masses.

    10. Re:And the winner is... by 0kComputer · · Score: 1

      In the last 10 years how many of the "big" inventions have Microsoft created for this budget. Zero, zip, nada, not a single sausage. In the 1970s Xerox managed to invent windowing operating systems, ethernet, laser printers, wirelesss networking (using lasers though) and a whole heap of other things. IBM have done a huge amount with transactional processing, system availability, domaining, messaging, brokerage and lots of other bits

      I guess IP version 6 doesn't count for shit right? Maybe you should check your facts buddy. They produce a lot of cool stuff, but a lot of stuff that you wouldn't recognize like accessablity tools for the blind, deaf etc.. You can bash MS all you want, but if you rip reaserch.microsoft.com, you just don't know what you're talking about.

      --
      Top 10 Reasons To Procrastinate
      10.
    11. Re:And the winner is... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Whoa, buddy, we're talking about Xbox. Are you entirely ignorant of Live?

      Yeah, a lot of Xbox technology is evolutionary, like HDTV support. But a lot of it is also pretty damned innovative and new... it blew me away when I found out the Xbox was going to have a HD installed. And you'd have to be living in a closet to think that Live service isn't innovative.

      (Sure, perhaps each PART of Live has been implemented before but not:
      1) Across many, many games and
      2) All in one package.)

      I know you have to bash the Xbox because it's Microsoft, but I guarantee that if it was the Sega Xbox, people would be praising it.

    12. Re:And the winner is... by mink · · Score: 1

      Looking at the RFC for IPV6 I see no indication that MS created it.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    13. Re:And the winner is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "microsoft" appears nowhere in RFC1883. But Xerox sure does. Go search it yourself.

      I must admit, their marketing seems to work wonders though.

    14. Re:And the winner is... by 0kComputer · · Score: 1

      try this

      by the way, what did xerox end up doing do with all these great user interface tools that they developed? They let Apple and Microsoft take them in one of the biggest business blunders ever.

      --
      Top 10 Reasons To Procrastinate
      10.
    15. Re:And the winner is... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      what does "off the shelf" have to do with making bad hardware?

      just say "i'm a beligerant f**boy and i'm proud of my stupidity".

      if you like "innovative" hw, then look at the hard to program ps2/saturn/ps3.

      well proven hw also matches up well to solid reliable software (usually).

      i hope all of them die with their new fangled DRM systems with add-on gameplay.

      the fuckers won't even let you use the hw you purchased.

      having multiple cpus and massive bw... which you cannot access.

      all of them should lose as far as i'm concerned.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    16. Re:And the winner is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't care about the other non Intel-based consoles simply because none of the other console processors were simultaneously competing with their core business. The Power family of processors, however, is gaining ground on the desktop, mid/high-end servers, and now going to gain significant volume in the console arena as well. Given these conditions, they'd be ignorant fools if they dismissed the console market out of hand.

      Any gains by Power in any market can be leveraged against them in their core markets (increased R&D (both of hardware and supporting software, such as dev tools), economy of scale, brand recognition, etc.).

  30. Vaporware by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    They hope to sell the box before christmas... It is still quite possible that you will be able to buy machines with CPU's faster than 3.0 GHz from Apple before you can buy them from Microsoft.

  31. Details by CleverNickedName · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the BBC:

    - CPU with three IBM PowerPC 3.2Ghz cores
    - ATI 500MHz graphics processor
    - 48 billion shader operations per second
    - 512Mb GDDR3 RAM of memory
    - Removable and upgradeable 20Gb hard drive
    - Three USB ports
    - Windows Media Extender built-in
    - Support for DVD-video, DVD-ROM, DVD-R, DVD+R, CD-DA, CD-R, WMA CD, MP3 CD, Jpeg photo CD

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    1. Re:Details by Obi+Quiet · · Score: 1

      But will the DVD playback upconvert to 720p and 1080i??? What about the Video and Audio out specs?? HDMI? DVI? Component?

  32. Guess what a friend of mine just got in the mail by Nicolasd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A nice commercial DVD about the Xbox from MS (btw he's the webmaster of an Xbox site here in Belgium) and just to make sure that he can play the DVD... MS kindly provided a Samung portable DVD player... and after that we'll all wonder why the Xbox gets good reviews...

  33. Will ANYTHING ever run Longhorn... by crovira · · Score: 1

    Its got some sweet specs (better than my PC.) But I wonder about the compatibility with an x86 architecture.

    (Then again, maybe M$ will escape the x86 arch. [Haaaa!!!!])

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Will ANYTHING ever run Longhorn... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      Well, being that it's PowerPC based, you'll probably have a better chance of running Mac OSX on it than Longhorn (x86)...but as the grandparent mentioned...Linux should kick some extreme ass with this triple core beast.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:Will ANYTHING ever run Longhorn... by mink · · Score: 1

      "Linux should kick some extreme ass with this triple core beast."

      Unlike normal POWER PC chips these AFAIK do "in order" I think LINUX or any other OS would have to be heavily tweaked to the platform.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. MTV Special by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whoa! I actually felt the 30 Minutes of my life pull from my body after watching that. I don't know which is worse, That Show, The VGA's or G4.

    The 360 definetly looks a little better when there's people standing next to it so you can get a idea what the size of it is. I'm also intreged by the Phantom sounding Marketplace that they talked little about. That's about all you got out of the "Pimp My Crap band and gamers you never heard of with Frodo Baggins and oh. Here's the Xbox 360 show"

    Perfect Dark Zero better be in an alpha state, because I've seen Better Graphics in Quake II. And the frame rate it appeared to be getting in the "competition" was worse than what the N64 Perfect Dark used to get. It had to be somewhere around 2-5FPS (which is probably why they kept the camera's off the screens as much as possible). The other previews for games looked promising. Specificially the Project Gotham and the game that kinda had beefed up Doom III Graphics (missed the name).

    The Ourcolony.net preview in five minutes gave more infomation about the XBox 360 then the entire 30 minutes on MTV. Frankly the power that is in this thing, especially considering it's size, is staggering. 1TFLOPS of processing power (if that number is true) is nothing to sneeze at. Especially when you start imagining a Beowulf Cluster of these and just 100 of them have a good chance of getting you ranked in the top500 list.

    1. Re:MTV Special by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Perfect Dark surfaces were all untextured. The poly counts were there, but none of the surfaces had any detail or mapping applied. So I also hope it is a early, early, build. I would imagine the guys at Rare will be texturing like crazy over the next few months. I'm waiting for the PS3. The "Cell" sounds sweet, and I bet the PS3 will be really sexy looking.

    2. Re:MTV Special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 TFlops is the total "system" power, but its all in the GPU. The CPU's are capable of a combined "9 billion dot product operations per second" according to xbox.com, which I'm assuming is the same as saying 9 GFlops peak. This puts the CPU power in the same class as a dual 2.0GHz G5 Mac, not bad seeing as it'll cost 1/10th the price.

      (The G5 gets twice as many GFlops/GHz as it has dual FPU's per chip/more complex VMX/Atli-Vec)

    3. Re:MTV Special by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      Of course, all of the information on Cell is preliminary and is questionable at best, but the max Gflops that Cell is supposed to run at is somewhere around 250 Gflops. At least thats what Wikipedia is telling me.

      If thats anywhere near accurate, it's going to take a quad core Cell based PS3 system to take on the Tri Core Xbox 360 it terms of sheer mathamatical speed.

      Of course, CPU GFLOPS isn't the only thing that translates into good graphics and gameplay. Nvidia is probably putting the most powerful silicon they can in the PS3, (In fact, the ATI core on the Xbox 360 seems to be the weak point compared to it's massive Processing CPU) and there is so much not known about cell that it's performance is speculative at best, but Sony has definetly got it's work cut out for them if they want to compete with the Xbox 360 processing wise, and Nintendo better have something absoletly unreal if their coming out as late as they are.

  36. official detailed info by tantalus · · Score: 3, Informative

    The official detailed info and specs for the xbox 360 can be found at http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox360/factsheet.htm/ and http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox360/peripheralsfacts heet.htm/

    1. Re:official detailed info by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

      huh?

      Search Text:
      Categories: 0
      Pages Found: 0
      No Matches

    2. Re:official detailed info by joshmoh · · Score: 1

      You've got trailing slashes on your urls that the xbox site doesn't like. Try:
      http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox360/peripheralsfacts heet.htm
      and
      http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox360/factsheet.htm

      --
      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  37. more disappointment from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't even get into any details of the Xbox 360. Most likely they have good reason. So far it looks like another disappointment by Microsoft. I can't wait to get my hands on the PS3.

  38. iPod killer by Chaos_Thoery · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bill Gates said he would bring down Apple's iPod one way or the other. I just don't know whether making it larger and providing less hard disk space is the way to go about it!

    1. Re:iPod killer by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Expect one of those "upgradeable" hard drives to in fact be a media player!

  39. xbox360: dnf by goodgoing · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was just browsing through the xbox360 games on 1up, and apparently duke nukem forever is going to be released on it...

    http://www.1up.com/do/gameOverview?cId=3140411

  40. Re:Wow... by Marthisdil · · Score: 1, Funny

    Me too - you not buying one will make it easier for me to buy 3 of them the day they come out :)

  41. Why 360? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1, Funny

    I associate the number 360 with some clunky old IBM mainframes. The CPU is from IBM, but that is hardly the intended association.

    It could be 360 degree vision. Does the console have souround video :)

    1. Re:Why 360? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      It's probaby more about the idea that the console can fully involve your (digital) life....

      Of course one could come up with less favourable analogies (say, coming full circle back to were we started).

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    2. Re:Why 360? by gipsy+boy · · Score: 1

      Because it's going to retail for 360$

  42. Longhorn for powerpc? by Folmer · · Score: 1

    Now when microsoft has made an OS that runs on the power5 cpu, the next step should be to make Longhorn run on the g5, so all the B/RSOD-hungry mac users can scrap OSX tiger :)

  43. And, btw, wanna know what happened to Unity?.. by hyphz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The music visualiser in the Xbox 360 is being done by Jeff Minter, as a massively enhanced version of the engine that was going to drive Unity. ;)

  44. Its awfully big by stoicio · · Score: 1

    arent electronics supposed to be getting smaller ?

  45. Windows Update by BigAlexK · · Score: 1

    I'll give a crisp British £5 note to the fine gentleman who gets a virus onto this infernal machine first.

    We've had enough of this American crap over here lads, I tell you, and enough's enough. Grandfather wouldn't have stood for it and neither will I.

    The monumental ballyhooness of it all!

    Playstation 3 made by the Japs you say? Ye Gods Man! Back to the trusty Psion it is then!

  46. What's in a name? by Stonewolf57 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Xbox 360? Isn't that kinda like saying we turned our new product completely around (figuratively speaking) so we could send it in same direction as the old one? Talk about a vote for uncreativity :p Yes, I did hear it was a nod to the skateboarding community. Why? And if so why not just call it the Xbox 180? It would make more sense. Go figure.

    1. Re:What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfft Next thing you know, you'll expect the Xbox audience to understand geometry. Shoulda named it the xbox 69 , at least they would have gotten a few "ha ha"s out of it.

  47. Its HUUUUGE too .. by torpor · · Score: 1

    ... and not in a 'good huge' way, but definitely in a 'this was designed by a fat American slob in Arkansas' kind of way.

    fer sure i won't be getting one.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  48. Re:And this goes with ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it's amazing to me that disks work at all. SCORE +3 QUEER EYE

    But seriiously since when have any game consoles looked that great. Buy for functionality not looks. Buy it for the games.

  49. XBox Homepage by weg · · Score: 1

    The XBox Homepage doesn't work correctly with Mozilla (1.04) and looks darn ugly even with Internet Explorer...

    --
    Georg
  50. What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A front-page article ought to at least say something about what an "Xbox 360" is. Sort of drags down the whole front page when I read the first article and haven't got any idea what you're trying to present me with. If it's only for the gamers, leave it on the section page.

  51. Tech. Fashion show by toonworld · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what it was? A lot of "hey this is how it looks and this is how you can change its look".

    Not much on specs. So what, they're selling looks now? Could this be the begining of tech. fashion show?

    Will there be a miss USB contest? :P

    --
    It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
  52. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by rpozz · · Score: 1

    All for $300?

    Take a look at this (no, I'm not an Apple fanboy):

    http://www.apple.com/powermac/

    It costs an arm and a leg, and requires some seriously powerful cooling. Now compare to the XBox 360. How the hell are they going to get that lot into a case that small, and cool it properly?

  53. Re:And this goes with ??? by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and we all know that gamers are statistically savvy about things like home decor.

  54. Re:Wow... by Stonewolf57 · · Score: 1

    Lol, I don't think you'll have a problem. Bring enough cash and you'll probably be able to be able to buy them all, and make stocking them actually worth it for the store. Here's for another designated Microsoft crapshoot.

  55. Re:And this goes with ??? by shepuk · · Score: 1
    And to think, it was only a couple of days ago that folks in these parts were arguing that only 12 year old girls would care about the range of customizable face available to change the look of the xbox 360....

    I'm somehow reminded of the golgafrinchams, who had problems with the invention of the wheel because they couldn't decide what colour it should be...

  56. The nice Microsoft conspiracy strategy by theolein · · Score: 1


    Actually, I think this console looks quite good, and I'm pretty sure that it will sell very well, as it has the specs to offer some fantastic performance.

    What I do wonder though, with Microsoft's switch to PPC in the console and pushing the XBox Live system, is whether Microsoft is planning to sometime start offering online versions of its Office, Browser and IM suites. I know that Microsoft was trying to offer online versions of Office to Internet Cafes back in 2000 but dropped the plans when nobody was interested, and I also know that Microsoft NEVER drops an idea, but simply keeps it in revision to offer in some future version or in another shape in the future.

    Considering that Microsoft would love to lock in users with an online subscription fee, i.e. one can't use the browser, IM or office if one isn't forking over those monthly dollars to the company, and that the XBox 360 offers Microsoft the opportunity to control the whole platform, from the hardware to the software to the OS to the content in one package for the first time in Microsoft's history.

    Expect a Microsoft keyboard and mouse for this console and Microsoft will be up and running, without any 3rd party OEMs to have to worry about, and with total control over what 3rd party content goes into the machine.

    Welcome to a Microsoft world.

  57. Re:Guess what a friend of mine just got in the mai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard they sent Thomson dvd players to the PS2 sites.

    ~kalinga

  58. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by kidgenius · · Score: 1

    They already mentioned the "watercooling" that the powermac uses. I'm curious how much of a loss the xbox360 will be sold for.

  59. Mods by certel · · Score: 1

    What what Microsoft has done to reduce the ease of modding? That's a big reason that a lot of people bought the XBOX.

    1. Re:Mods by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, I mod xboxes as a way to make some extra income. I have sold about 200 premodded boxes, and modded about 800 more.

      --

      Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
      Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
    2. Re:Mods by wvitXpert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know what they've done technically. But the biggest issue is the increased emphasis on Xbox Live. If modding your Xbox means you can't use live it's not going to be a very attractive prospect to most gamers.

    3. Re:Mods by certel · · Score: 1

      Well, that's not the case as is with the current Xbox. If they still want to mod it, they have services such as XLink and XBConnect. I'm not really sure if Live is going to make that big of a difference to the current modded crowd.

    4. Re:Mods by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1

      You can get on live even with a chip. The eXtender and X3 are a very nice combo that allow you to use XBox Live and still be chipped.

      --

      Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
      Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
    5. Re:Mods by CalTrumpet · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can, but that is only because Microsoft tolerates the chipping community.

      There's nothing stopping them from updating the software upon Live connection in a way that detects chips while offline. I'm sure that will be the policy for the 360.

    6. Re:Mods by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Even if Microsoft cracks down there will be a work around. This is an arms race, and the modders will always be a step ahead.

      --

      Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
      Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
    7. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahead of IBM?

      *cough*

      Hypervisor.

    8. Re:Mods by FrothyBitter · · Score: 1

      Actually modders are a step behind by definition as there is nothing to mod until MS releases it. Where MS messed up big time on the XBOX was relying on hardware protection as once the hardware protection is broken the game is over.

      With software protection they can continuously repair chinks in the armor and keep the box locked down as long as they want. The iPod is the most obvious example of this. Every time someone punches a hole in Apple's iron curtain they plug the hole with the next release of iTunes.

      While it might appear Apple is playing catch up with the hackers, in reality it is the hackers that are forced to continually come up with new ways to storm the castle.

      Of course you can look at it from a hardware angle and say that all one need do is simply not update the software. Yet in the case of both the iPod and 360 you would loose a large portion of the functionality of the device.

      This general conception that hackers will always win is a dangerous one I think. If people accept all these, not only closed systems, but completely locked down systems with the expectation that hackers will always be able to unlock them and open them up to allow us our fair use then the day will come when everything is locked down.

      CSS completely locked down DVD playback. Only DVD players with a valid key can play DVDs. Keys were only given to companies that agreed to implement all the lock down they demanded. Keys themselves were to be encrypted in the players and it was only because of a mistake that one player's key was left unencrypted. Hackers found the unencrypted key and were not only able to use it, but generate more valid keys from it. As it turns out this key encryption was a rather weak 40 bit encryption that can be easily brute forced.

      DeCSS is therefore a product of 2 mistakes, weak encryption keys and leaving a key unencrypted. The genie was out of the bottle, well countless millions of bottles, and it will take a new bottle to capture it again. New bottles are on their way, Bluray/HDDVD.

      At the time of DVDs inception it was hard to imagine brute forcing a 40 bit key, and indeed the keys did hold until the first one was found unencrypted. This time around you can bet the keys will be very strong and encryption of the keys will be closely scrutinized. I wouldn't even be surprised if players had firmware that could be updated transparently by a movie disc to allow the protection scheme to evolve if need be.

      The point is, most hacks are the result of simple mistakes. With phone home technology such mistakes can be rectified in the future, if, and that's a big if, they ever exist to begin with.

      Of course with corporations buying new laws at will, protection schemes might not even be necessary in the future. How many distributions sites are able to stand up to the legal might of hundreds of lawyers armed with dozens of recently purchased laws?

      The only way to effectively combat this corporate lock down is by adopting Nancy Reagan's mantra and "Just say no to locked down technologies." Unfortunately, judging from how readily people lap up iPods I'm afraid it's going to be an uphill battle.

  60. lame presentation. lame performance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the presentation was rather lame and the gaming scenes looked darm pre-recorded. anyone can publish some specs without showing the actual product in action. also, if the PS3 has just half as great as Sony claims it will still outperform the Xbox 360 several times.

  61. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

    How do you think its "now much in graphics"?

    The 10MB is EDRAM, (just call it cache:) ), and the gpu also has the 20GB/s access to the 512MB main memory.
    Plus it has 48 Shader pipelines (although not comparable with cureent GPU numbers because this are unified shaders), so it should be al least GF6800 level.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  62. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by DebianDog · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess the good news is... we can expect dual 3Ghz Powermac from Apple this summer!

  63. Another link to Toronto Star by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Toronto Star (some soul sucking required). In the dead tree version it was on page A3 with a mention on the front page.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  64. The 360 Starter Edition... by digital.prion · · Score: 1

    Discounted versions of the 360 (codenamed 180s ) are expected to be on sale later this year.

    --
    Smile.
  65. Ugly "beige box" by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
    Wow -- it's not much more than an ugly "beige box".

    This design does not exude coolness. I would've thought it'd have a much cooler appearance -- this physical box alone will not be enough to entice buyers. Better be a good gaming platform.

    Sam

    1. Re:Ugly "beige box" by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      well when I saw it I thought it looked a lot like one of the first Phantom mockups (except for the color), standing up on its side...

    2. Re:Ugly "beige box" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats exactly what I thought after realizing that the new xbox was not an android in a blue dress.
      Man, I thought I was finally going to play with a girl, that would have been awesome, best console ever... anyway, great design.

      - Kyle Orland

  66. Graphics quality by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    The first movie I downloaded (Tomb Raider) look pretty much last-generation, as did some of the screenshots I saw, so initially I was quite unimpressed by the graphics, luckily enough, NFS seems to make a better impression. Just wondering why these other games look so crappy as NFS proves the XBox 360 is obviously capable of a lot more.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  67. Re:And this goes with ??? by rokzy · · Score: 1

    as someone pointed out in another story the case is a complete rip-off of a Dell XPS (or some other three letter acronym).

    would you buy a Dell? of course not.

  68. Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by FidelCatsro · · Score: 0

    if this is the Xbox 360 ,then What hapend to #'s 2-359

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out for the Xbox 540 or 720... why would I want only one circle when I can have two! ... seriously though... As a moderate gamer [serious GTA:SA addict] I'd have to say "bleh who cares". Content of games is the shits. Shinier shit is just shiny shit.

      PS2/XBOX are at the point of decent graphics that don't tear away from the gameplay [like the PS1 would] and really the only "better" thing they could have is more ram [for lower load times].

      Anyways, I'll hold my breath for anything good to come out of this.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      heh , Sorry about the bad joke i just had to get it out the way as we can be prepared for several years of them .What if you straped 3 Xbox 360s together and used them for a snowboard , could nintendo sue.

      Indeed the games are the key , You can have the best hardware in the world but if your games are too few in number(see the neo-geo) , too expensive (see the neo-geo again)or too poor quality/all the same(see the neo-geo although it did have some great fighting games , but that was nearly all it had), then all you have is a nice expensive DVD player that dosn't fit in the tv shelf.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by wandazulu · · Score: 0

      For old timers, the joke that gets old quickly is:

      "Yes, but can it run my JCL decks?"

    4. Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree... GTA:SA is the perfect example of a game that's too ambitious for it's hardware; it would have been much better suited to a next-gen console. The graphics were grainy (although the textures were OK), jaggies all over the place, and you get some serious performance issues in key parts of the game. Don't get me wrong, the game itself is pretty good and a blast, but the lackluster hardware performance (especially texture load time! Driving over not-yet-rendered bridges is weird) seriously hampered my enjoyment of the game.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    5. Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? ok... we obviously play games for different reasons.

      BTW the exact reason for the "not yet rendered" [it is actually rendering btw] is CD load time. The model for the city is in memory but not the textures [they're rotated out LRU style]. So if you drive super fast you're going faster than the CD can access/load the data [seems odd]. Thus the game engine just renders transparent surfaces.

      If you drive fast enough you can occasionally see the green backing of the interstate signs blank and just have the white wireframe text up... it's funny.

      Anyways, I find the game a sufficiently pleasant waste of time even with that shortcomming.

      When I look at games like the old Splinter cells [chaos theory is good imo] they're nice looking games that are way too hard to play. I don't play for work ... I play to waste time.

      In GTA I can hop on a quadbike and go on a murder spree. That's not only fun but it's educational in case I have todo it in real life.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Hehe I work on a mainframe and I find this particulary funny. Lowly tape monkey, here, but I'm learning more about JCL.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    7. Re:Introducing a joke you will get sick of quickly by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the delay in seing textures sometimes is definitely the CD load time. I have an Xbox, and it was very noticeable on GTA3 (LC) if you were driving fast - sometimes whole buildings, and the road would be a plain colour until you were actually on top of them.
      Then I put a modchip in my xbox, and copied the game to the HD, and the loadtimes are GONE. Going overa bridge to another section of the city involves a load time of about half a second.
      It what the grandparent poster said about San Andres is true (it asks too much of the current hardware & slows down in places) then I CAN'T WAIT to get it. The xbox has a lot more graphics and CPU power than the ps2 (supercomputer?) so hopefully they use that extra power to take some of the rough edges off, like they did with Vice City.

  69. No video-out... by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that the video-out port on the Xbox is blacked out on the pictures on xbox360.com? I would really love to know what kind of connection(s) it will have.

    1. Re:No video-out... by hollismb · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not blacked out. It's black. That's a custom video port, into which you plug whatever custom adapter/cable you purchase seperately. Exactly like the current Xbox. Expect COAX, Composite (included in the box), S-video, Component, and hopefully DVI/HDMI.

  70. Linux? What about Mac OS X?! by taskforce · · Score: 1
    While one of the cores might have to go unused, it's not outside the realms of possibility that someone could get OS X to run on this thing becuase of it's PowerPC ties.

    If so, it'll be more powerful than the faster PowerMac, be around the same price and size as the MacMini, and have more USB ports to boot :D

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    1. Re:Linux? What about Mac OS X?! by Astatine · · Score: 1

      Yes, broken record time, my third post on this subject :)

      You can be pretty sure those cores are stripped-down units that aren't as good general purpose wise as the PowerPC 970. If you could get OS X on this thing I doubt it would run it as well as a real Mac, despite the core count and the higher clock speed.

  71. But you can't buy the song you're watching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have made it so that you can press a button to buy a song or TV show that you're watching on TV! And advertisers could sell products that way too.

  72. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by Astatine · · Score: 1

    See my longer comment further up :) I believe the three PowerPC cores are stripped-down ones, not "for real" like in the Macs (and not as good as "for real" ones either). The graphics chip is pretty much "for real" though, although expect a bit of slowdown because of contention for the main memory (nice to see GDDR used for that). I'd estimate the GPU to be somewhat better than current 6800s and somewhat less good than the forthcoming Nvidia G70, with the exception of the eDRAM which, AFAIK, basically just buys them multisampled FSAA for free (no room for much more than a full colour 720p framebuffer in there). (So for an entire machine that costs about as much as one high end GPU for a PC, it's a damn good deal...)

  73. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by rpozz · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter if it's watercooled or not. You still have to move the heat elsewhere. You can't just 'get rid of it'.

  74. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the chips that were supposed to ship in Summer 2004, according to Steve Jobs?

  75. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not much of a GPU? it has 10MB of EDRAM, and it has 256GB/sec of bandwidth in to it! That's ALOT of bandwidth. No, it's fucking HUGE amount of bandwidth! And in addition, it has the regural GDDR3 at it's disposal as well.

    And it has 48 pipelines running at 500Mhz. Current top of the line PC-GPU's have 16 pipelines running at around 500Mhz. So I think it's pretty safe to say that the GPU on this this is a real monster!

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  76. I think they're moving... by Nijika · · Score: 1

    It feels like they're moving away from the OS. There are a lot of businesses out there, but there are a lot more consumers. If they can dominate the consumer market in some big way they can start subtracting focus from all the other stuff they've been quagmired in.

    Look at what Apple did with the iPod. It saved them in a lot of ways.

    So yeah, if they come out with the best gaming box ever, why do I need my hyper powerful PC? I'll just get a more powerful Mac instead.

    And that's the thing. Now you're buying a Mac or switching to Linux (BSD, etc, whathaveyou), which you might do anyway out of disguist when Longhorn comes out, but you're also buying in to Microsoft's new X-Box also.

    You're still giving MS money. All this talk about mobile devices, and convergence. It's almost like they're letting Linux and Apple have the desktop, because they want the people now and not the businesses that employ those people.

    I don't think I can call this a bad thing, I've always considered XP the best gaming OS out there. So what we have is a situation where if you're doing any serious computing, you can use Apple, or a Linux, and if you're playing games you can go sit on the couch with your Microsoft product, with your Microsoft phone near by.

    Personally the idea is starting to grow on me.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:I think they're moving... by ditangquan · · Score: 1

      I can't agree with you thinking that the direction of Apple is the desktop market. It isn't. You'll see an Apple Internet OS using Quicktime/iTunes on Windows [horned beast like cow] and media domination. Apple will be one of the top Internet companies. There are interesting things happening with that Apple trojan horse QuickTime with the 400 million installations on Windows boxes. Watch this segment...grow. there are surprises in store. I think MS as well as Google have a lot of surprises in the next couple of years that are under wraps, we have a huge OS battle in the makings, we can only see the fringe. this is going to be fun!

    2. Re:I think they're moving... by Baggio · · Score: 1

      You couldn't be further from the truth.

      While it may be true that there are a lot of consumers out there, that market is small potatoes when compared to the lucrative business market and the associative sustained engineering contracts.

      Windows on the home PC is there in reality to provide an environment that is familar in the business. If everyone owns at home, and uses XP, then that will in turn drive sales in the business sector.

      Microsoft will not give up its bid for that as it is the bread and butter of the company. It is because of the OS and Office groups that Microsoft has money to spend on other ventures like XBox 360.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow;
      Fruit flies like a bananna
  77. "Tiger Woods" on the MTV show.. by falzbro · · Score: 1, Troll

    The grass in Tiger Woods '06 looked like a 3DFX Voodoo 1 texture blur-mess. Another game that they showed, and I don't know which, was running at about 15fps. This is what 3 * 3.2ghz) gets us?

    Also, is it possible that this new box is even LARGER than the first?

    --falz

  78. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by dlZ · · Score: 1

    I'm very happy about 16:9 widescreen and 1080i. I know I bought that 52" HDTV for some reason. Yeah, some X-Box games do, but not enough, and the difference is very noticiable on a TV this size, especially when you get used to HDTV. My PS2 looks like absolute crap on it, I ended up moving it into another room and hooking it up to a 17" LCD.

    --
    rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  79. Go Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They realised that Sony's Playstation was using consecutive integer versioning and so they jumped RIGHT up to the high numbers. There's more numbers so it must be better, right?

    Some how I'm reminded of The Simpsons where Bart asks his mum for the 256 bit version of a console as an upgrade to his 254 bit version.

  80. Controller question by elliotj · · Score: 1

    I've never used a console before, but since I'm now a Mac user (I love my Mac), I've been thinking more and more about getting a console so I can play some of the games that I can't get for my Mac (HL2 for instance).

    I'm a longtime PC gamer and am very used to the keyboard+mouse combo for FPS in particular. I don't see how the Xbox controller can compare. It has far fewer buttons for one, and I don't like using my thumbs for movement.

    Can you hookup a keyboard+mouse or some kind of third party controller to consoles like Xbox?

    What have other people found when switching from PC gaming to consoles?

    1. Re:Controller question by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### Can you hookup a keyboard+mouse or some kind of third party controller to consoles like Xbox?

      Yes, there are adapters that allow you to plug-in mouse and keyboard to use them in shooters, however no idea how well that works or if that requires special support from the games. In general however you can live very good without mouse+keyboard. Its true that aiming gets a bit harder, but the games are tuned to handle that by offering a little auto-aim and things like that. Some games such as MetroidPrime(Gamecube) even go as far as to go away from the mouse-look completly and use a more Zelda-like Look-On system to aim at enemies.

  81. It's a nice thought by goldcd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with the PC platform is that software is designed to run on 'most' PCs out there. If you've got some bleeding edge number cruncher, then you can probably stick up the resolution, have nicer textures and all manner of extra little bits of gilding - but the basic game running underneath it is still constrained by the weakest PC in their target market.
    The 'nice' thing about consoles (and there are many nice things) is that code can be optimized for the hardware (compare a game running on an Xbox with the PC version running on a machine of the same spec) and that everybody has the same base. For example the Xbox360 appears to be able to support a massive chunk of simple raw processing - you can have a game that has complex physics as an integral part - you know it'll run on all machines. If you tried it on low spec PC it just wouldn't run (and I suspect a high-spec PC isn't going to be showing up the 360 any time soon).

    1. Re:It's a nice thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless, of course, you develop simultaneously for PCs and Consoles... which MS is trying to do with Xbox 360. A PC-based console will never keep pace with the continually evolving PC game/hardware market, and it remains to be seen if people are willing to shell out the money needed to keep current with the latest iteration of said consoles.

    2. Re:It's a nice thought by crazyaxemaniac · · Score: 1

      Of course as the parent pointed out on the console games just work. It's a crap shoot on the PC if the game will run or run acceptably.

      I've seen recently released titles like Psyconauts running fine on X-box while they crawl on my better spec'ed PC.

      I could probably spend $300 buying a new video card and a sound card to fix my problem but that would probably only little while before I started to hit the wall again. Why not spend my money on the Xbox and have less hassle.

    3. Re:It's a nice thought by WNight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was true, but now the time to optimize a big game enough to matter through all the machine-specific tricks often isn't available. There are a lot of tricks that depend on having fixed specs - only have one resolution of textures, etc, but the specific register, tweaking code order optimizations just can't be done in a practical time and they are what used to make consoles so amazing. If it can't be done in the API, game developers aren't going to do it. In the days of the NES it was more practical - much of the code would be hand-tweaked ASM anyways.

    4. Re:It's a nice thought by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually you run into the lowest common denominator problem on consoles too. Most games are released for all the systems, yet since PS2 is so much slower than the Xbox and GC...they don't look that much better on them. You might get larger textures and anti-aliasing but not much more than that. The same thing will happen for this next generation too unless it's an exclusive title.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    5. Re:It's a nice thought by Babbster · · Score: 1
      This is why moving first on their new home console may be a big benefit to Microsoft. Clearly, the first "next-gen" games will be made for their platform, with their SDK. When folks go to port (when Nintendo and Sony actually have something out there with which to do so), they'll be starting from the Xbox 360 and going from there. Even if Revolution and PS3 end up with more power (which would be friggin' amazing - three 3+-GHz, dual-threaded cores is ridiculous) the ports from 360 won't experience dramatic improvement. If they're less powerful, either the developer will have to cut features back or skip making the port entirely (de facto exclusive).

      Any way you slice it, it'll be fun watching this shake out over the next three years. Viva la console wars!

    6. Re:It's a nice thought by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      The problem with the PC platform is that software is designed to run on 'most' PCs out there....the basic game running underneath it is still constrained by the weakest PC in their target market.

      EQ2 is a perfect example of that, but what's interesting about that is the "basic game" underneath hasn't really changed all that much since the mid 90's. Most of the "gild" as you described it is the advancement in the game.

      If you crank everything down to minimum settings on EQ2 is looks suspiciously alot like EQ1. Muddled textures, flat lighting, low polygon counts, unsmooth animation, limited number of characters on the screen at once, no flora, no shadowing, etc etc.

      Turn it all up and now you realize why you ungraded your computer every couple of years. To run near the highest settings you don't need the latest and the greatest something 2 years old will run it just fine. In others words most of your parts will be out of the bargin bin.

      As far as high-spec PC's are concerned, do you remember when the last Xbox came out. MS was bragging how they had the latest GPU and it was better than anything available for the PC, aka the GF3, and PC's got it a whole 6 months later. The same thing is happening with the 360.

      People forget most gaming PC's are already multi-core or multi-PU machines. The 360 has 6 non-dedicated, your typical gaming PC has 3. 2 dedicated (video and sound) and one CPU. By this time next year that'll jump to something between 4-7.

      As I said before, the 360/PC agrument will be all the rage on the boards just like with the Xbox. And it'll rage on for about 2 years or so, right up until a low end PC cheap price surpasses it, just like the original Xbox. To say the 360 is going to superior to all comers for some time, is silly. High end PC's are already walking away from it as we speak.

      360 - multicore CPU
      PC - got it
      360 - game and VOIP
      PC - have it
      360 - advanced physics
      PC - old news
      360- accelerated physics?
      PC - I'll have it about the same time you will.

      A physics accelerator card is due for fall release from a company called Ageia (http://www.ageia.com/). Epic has already jumped on board with support with it in it's Unreal engine. Should be pretty interesting to see what it can do.

      360 - dedicated video with high speed RAM
      PC - very old news
      360 - media center functions with TV/HDTV support and external harddrives
      PC - yawn
      360 - USB mouse and key board support
      PC - you're joking right?

      PC- my turn

      PC - Multi monitor diplays?
      360 - I can't do that.
      PC - dual dedicated GPU's?
      360 - errrrr no.
      PC - greater than TV rezs
      360 - nope
      PC - future dedicated PPU?
      360 - nope
      PC - large amounts of RAM?
      360 - no
      PC - RAID hardrive configurations?
      360 - no
      PC - any expansion slots or upgradeable?
      360 - does USB count?
      PC - no
      PC - components that are upgraded in the market at least anually?
      360- no
      PC - custom cases?
      360 - no
      PC - custom software?
      360 - not without modding me or violating my user agreement
      PC - digital recording/encoding/editing? 360 - sorry no PC - can you do anything but play games/media?
      360 - nope I'm a one trick Pony

      PC - Smiles, pats 360 on it's head and goes to the fridge for another beer...shakes his head

      Kids these days they think they are so hot

      Don't get me wrong, I just love bashing on the "PC gaming is dead crowd" I think the 360 is going to be pretty slick, but it'll never knock the PC off it's spot. The PC is just to flexable and usefull to die out even in the gaming world. I will though be picking up a 360 for the living room, and move my noisier media server PC to the garage

    7. Re:It's a nice thought by NickV · · Score: 1

      PC - greater than TV rezs
      360 - nope


      Um... Welcome to 2005. You do know what HDTV is right? All 360 games are HD. In case you don't know HDTV resolutions are HIGHER than most computers can push.

      You're telling me that your Computer can push out Doom 3 at 1920x1080? Xbox 360 can.

      You're telling me that your computer costs less than $400? XBox 360 does.

      You think a $300-$400 PC can push these types of graphics at 1920x1080?

      Oh, but I can get a RAID configuration on the PC... yay...

      Go sit down and stop trolling.

    8. Re:It's a nice thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason that you can't take advantage of this stuff through an API. It may be slightly less than optimal, but it can still be very good. Also, Microsoft has a lot of smart people working there, so I suspect they'll probably have a fairly highly optimized API implementation at the start.

      It also seems likely that the big dev. houses will build up optimized libraries over time.

    9. Re:It's a nice thought by jensen404 · · Score: 1

      It's 1920*540 or 1280*720... about 1 million pixels.

    10. Re:It's a nice thought by Nyder · · Score: 1

      a lame AC posted this, and I actually laughed:

      "...Also, Microsoft has a lot of smart people working there..."

      --
      Be seeing you...
    11. Re:It's a nice thought by Nyder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Babbster posted the following:
      " This is why moving first on their new home console may be a big benefit to Microsoft...."

      Yes, just like the Dreamcast helped Sega.
      or the Jaguar helped Atari?

      Personally, I'm not holding my breath. I haven't seen the Xbox 360 in action, and sure, from it's specs it sounds nice. But then, the Cell chips sound very nice for the PS3. Not to mention Nintendo might actually have something very good this time around (but once again, I'm not holding my breath).

      once the machines are out, and games are out for them, then I can make judgements.

      But the problem with the consoles is technology can rapidly outpace them. Sure, Xbox360 may be nothing like we currently have now, but by the xmas 2005 we will see things like PPU add-in cards (PhysX Chip http://interviews.teamxbox.com/xbox/1117/AGEIA-Tec hnologies-Interview/p1
      )
      Which has the ability to completely change gaming.
      But of course, how much depends on how the final product works.
      There is a chance it's in the Xbox360, but I doubt it. They would of mentioned it by now I would think. Seems to me the addition of one of these chips would be ideal to console makers.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    12. Re:It's a nice thought by Nyder · · Score: 1

      um, first, where did you get the $400 price?
      second, who said the Xbox360 can do Doom 3 at 1920x1080? Either show me a vid of someone playing it, or you stop trolling.
      I do know, for a fact, that you can play Doom 3 at 1600x1200 with 70+ fps on a PC.

      But you are right, a $300 to $400 PC couldn't push those sort of graphics, but until the Xbox360 is being sold for that price, it's not worth that much. Since the hardware makers usually take a lost on hardware, then that makes the systems worth more, until everyone can get them at the listed price.
      After all, when the Xbox specs were announced, they were better then what was out at the time, but by the time it got released, the PC's were cheaper and closer, and it didn't take long before the cost came down.
      But that doesn't matter. The fact is, the Xbox360 isn't made to replace the home computer. Or at least, according to their track record with the Xbox, they don't intended that. Matter of fact, MS doesn't want anyone using their Xbox(360) for anything other then what they intended it for.
      While the specs are very nice, and the first adopters are going to probably have a cool factor, history has taught me to wait...

      --
      Be seeing you...
  82. MTV XBox Veiling by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    If you ask me ...

    The MTV special was a complete waste of time.
    It didn't show off anything other then the exterior of the console. And the fact that you can change the face plate ... just like your favoirite cell phone.
    Thank GOD I have TiVo and could skip the 20 min. of commercials.
    At points it seemed like the commentators were disappointed w/ what they were seeing. I'm sure they wanted to play some games ... and were trying to be positive about the customizeable face plate thingy.
    The only thing I know about the xBox 2 is that it's called the xBox 360 ... whatever ... maybe they should have called it xBox.NET ;)

    Later,
    -- The Dude

    1. Re:MTV XBox Veiling by mpapet · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you and a whole lot of other people watched it right?

      That's all Microsoft wanted, and they got it. Judging by the number of comments that mention details from the event on /. alone I'd say that Microsoft couldn't be happier.

      Based on what I've read, this thing was the worst kept secret in gaming. Why waste time watching? /.'s could have guessed it was going to be all filler anyway.

      Slightly OT:
      I wonder who got paid the most out of the event. Did M$ get a cut of the commercials? Did MTV charge MS to do it?

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    2. Re:MTV XBox Veiling by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

      I currently own an xBox ...

      I'm going to wait until the release of the PS3 to see if it simply crushes the new xBox technology.

      Cheers,
      -- me

  83. Somewhat OT... by nighthawk127127 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... I recall reading that the reason they're calling it "Xbox 360" is because "Xbox 2" would sound less sophisticated than the Playstation 3. Since these two consoles will be duking it out for a while, M$ didn't want to give Sony any advantage. Well that's all well and good, but here's my question: What are they going to call the next iteration of Xbox? They'll always be faced with the dilemma of being one step behind the Playstation. Xbox 3 vs. PS4, you get the idea. How are the going to solve that problem? "Xbox 720," anyone?

    --
    10100111001
    1. Re:Somewhat OT... by emt377 · · Score: 0
      "What are they going to call the next iteration of Xbox?"

      That will be the Xbox\370.

    2. Re:Somewhat OT... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      No, certainly they will make the same thing they did with Windows, and start making names with sensless 2 letters combinations like:

      XBox PE
      Xbox NE
      Xbox UP

      wtf... I dont know, any combination is fine...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Somewhat OT... by SerialEx13 · · Score: 1

      They'll skip a number and just go with XBox 4. Nullsoft and Netscape did it. Just to clarify any possible confusion, I am aware of the reasoning behind the version jumps of the products of those two organisations.

  84. The Xbox 360 Offers Nothing To True Gamers by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone can squawk about hardware specs, looks, controllers (which are nothing new at all, ooh wireless!), Media capabilities... NO MENTION OF GAMES ANYWHERE! Anyone notice this? Give me a B.S. vision of the games to come that will be totally amazing, which will never actually release anyhow, as consoles USED to do to promote a freakin GAMING console!

    Nothing can be said for the games at all and this is supposed to be a gaming console. Sony and MS have missed the mark by miles with these "next gen" efforts. No real gamer cares one bit about processors or a stupid video camera attachment or even a hard drive really... notice how well the eye toy and PS2 hard drive sold? What makes anyone think people are willing to pay through the nose for a console that supports technology people have no interest in? If there is no interest today, nothing is going to change by next year, in fact there will be less enthusiasm by then.

    This will not sell 100 million as is stated by MS, I don't believe the PS3 will even sell 100 million... people are turning away from this rush to produce expensive hardware with no new games and ideas to back them and short life cycles, note the PSP and DS not exactly selling like hotcakes. I can't wait to laugh at the massive losses incurred this round in consoles, Nintendo will also be laughing all the way to the bank by not taking huge losses on hardware and focusing on ease of use and innovative content.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:The Xbox 360 Offers Nothing To True Gamers by Astatine · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Shameless plug time, but I was under the impression that The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (http://www.elderscrolls.com/) was going to be one of the launch titles for this thing. I'm most disappointed there appears to have been no mention of it, it looks much better than the stuff they did come up with...

    2. Re:The Xbox 360 Offers Nothing To True Gamers by xombo · · Score: 1

      At my store the PSP sells about as well as GBA SP systems. We haven't moved a DS since March.

  85. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the 10MB of DRAM may not seem like a lot, it is being said that it is only used for rendering 1 frame in hi definition. Clearly they could add more, but they must have figured out that is all anyone would ever need.

  86. Taking Advantage by Tony · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think about the amount of time game developers would have to spend just to take full advantage of the graphics (forgetting about gameplay).

    No kiddin'. It was years before PS1 games were taking full advantage of the hardware. Same with PS2 games; compare R&C Up Your Aresenal to Rayman or any of the other early PS2 games, or event the first R&C. Big, big difference. The good thing is, it keeps the console fresh.

    The XBox wasn't that big of deal because it was essentially a PC. The difference between Halo and Halo 2 wasn't really that great. With the XBox 360 being a different beast, there might be a huge difference between the first run games and the later games, as people learn to take advantage of the hardware.

    Maybe.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:Taking Advantage by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      It was a long maturity process for the PSX, but the drive for more wasn't as big as it is now. The audience was much smaller, so you didn't have as many people expecting more out of the hardware of that era. Change came at a much slower pace.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    2. Re:Taking Advantage by KE1LR · · Score: 1
      A good example of this learning curve for xbox developers is MechAssault vs. MechAssault 2 for xbox. The first one was a rocking good game but was clearly written by people who hadn't learned to really take advantage of all that the hardware could deliver.

      MechAssault 2 plays almost identically to the first one but is light-years better visually.

      With two fans I'll bet the 360 is pretty loud though. :-/

  87. Why not add a PVR? by buda_30 · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe that it would be so difficult to add PVR functionality to this machine, while the DVD-R wars are raging. The advantage of this machine is access to the TV, so why not take the next step?

    1. Re:Why not add a PVR? by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      I believe the idea is to use it in conjunction with a Media Center PC.

  88. Not a PS3 fan boy by Dalroth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I am not a PS3 fan boy by any stretch of the imagination. Hell, I've owned every console BUT the N64 and Gamecube (I'm a little tired of Nintendo's kid centric approach to their systems).

    That being said, I was, to say the least, very underwhelmed. Ghost Recon 3 looked interesting, and the Sports games looked good (even though I hate sports games). Nothing else looked particularly impressive and some of the games looked worse than existing current generation games.

    Microsoft is pulling the trigger way to early. The current systems have at least another good solid year in them, and a year of additional development can make a helluva difference in quality for the new systems.

    As it is, it looked more like the transition from Sega Genesis to Sega 32x than from Sega Genesis to the PlayStation/2, and that's not a good thing.

    Here's to hoping they can pull off a miracle in 6 months, but I'm skeptical.

    Bryan

    1. Re:Not a PS3 fan boy by mink · · Score: 1

      ayah, Perfect Dark,Golden Eye, Conker's BF, Resident Evil series, Eternal Darkness, Skies of Arcadia, BX XX (crap tho), and others I cant be bothered to look up are so totally pandering to kiddies. No adults could ever enjoy any Nintendo games since the SNES and Nintendo never had a game published that might not be for the tykes.

      Maybe if you tried some of the games offered on those platforms, you might learn how wrong you are. I note you did not list the GBA there, does this mean you have one of those, because frankly it has a much more kid friendly/orientated product line.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  89. PowerPC by Amiasian · · Score: 0

    Here's a few thoughts and questions.

    1) I'm not liking this trend in the console space. By "trend" I mean the tendency to come out with new systems faster and faster. In the old days, the Nintendo Entertainment system had a (I'm guessing) eight year or so lifespan. And nobody really ever saw that as a bad thing. It had a nice library of games, and people still remember it fondly.

    Now we get maybe two or three years before the upgrade cycle begins anew. I'm in favor of longevity and building a nice library of games rather than always trying to do something new, at least in the console space. For computers, well I don't mind that so much.

    2) Because it's based on the PowerPC architecture, what's the likelihood we'll see Macs able to emulate the games made for it? Assuming Apple gets its ass in gear with the GhZ gap that this'll present. If not emulation, how about porting? It seems that it'll be made vastly more easy to port games to the Mac now.

    In which case, one wonders what Microsoft was thinking. You don't make it easier to move games to your most visible competitor without some reason behind it. Contracts and licenses I guess will secure that.

    3) Again, noting the PowerPC based architecture and the fact that the other two console vendors are also expected to be using some variant of it, is there a chance we could see a drop in price in all PPC products (namely Macs)? I'd hope so.

    1. Re:PowerPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two to three years? PlayStation2 is 5 years old.

    2. Re:PowerPC by RoLi · · Score: 1
      IIRC the PS2 came out aproximately in early 2000, so it will be almost seven years old when the PS3 comes out in late 2006.

      Yes, I think the PS is the yardstick here because only a small minority has an XBox or Gamecube

    3. Re:PowerPC by MulluskO · · Score: 1

      I bet they stick with DirectX, so I really doubt that emulation will be any easier on an Apple.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
  90. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by Rogue+Pat · · Score: 1
    This being Microsoft ;) there's a small cathc though. According to http://www.gamespot.com/features/6124293/p-2.html the wireless network is not included...
    The rear of the system has a third USB 2.0 port, an Ethernet port, and a slot for a small, gum-packet-sized Wi-Fi adapter. At this time, the wireless adapter will be sold separately."
  91. Re:Does she... by r_j_howell · · Score: 0

    +1 Double entendre

  92. Windows on the Power Architecture??? by cyberjessy · · Score: 1

    I have been wondering about this for quite some time ....

    Does this mean that Microsoft has the Windows Kernel running on a Power architecture? Isn't XBox based on DX10?

    I am wondering why this isn't more significant than the XBox itself? Maybe I am wrong, please correct me!

    --
    Life is just a conviction.
    1. Re:Windows on the Power Architecture??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also curious about what OS it runs!

    2. Re:Windows on the Power Architecture??? by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Well, there was an NT4 port to PPC a while back, so I assume that MS is partially basing this version of Windows on their old PPC port.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    3. Re:Windows on the Power Architecture??? by CalTrumpet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Windows NT originally had a kernel that ran on PPC, so this really isn't a huge jump for them.

      PPC can switch big/little endian, and since the low-level bootstrapping and HAL code already existed, it probably wasn't a huge deal to build XNA (this is their new XBox/Win gaming dev platform) compilers for x86, PPC, x64, and maybe even .Net CLR.

    4. Re:Windows on the Power Architecture??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early NT ran on MIPS, Alpha and PPC as well as the x86.
      Nothing new.

    5. Re:Windows on the Power Architecture??? by LionMage · · Score: 1
      PPC can switch big/little endian

      IIRC, this has been disabled in the newer 64-bit PowerPC chips. There was a mode switch that was utilized in older versions of Virtual PC; I've seen it referred to online as "virtual little endian mode." (Microsoft talks about it on this page and refers to it as "pseudo little-endian mode.") The G5 lacks this mode, so Virtual PC was not compatible with the G5 PowerMac initially.

      Another article seems to agree with me:
      Support for operation as in both Big-Endian and Little-Endian modes; the PowerPC can switch from one mode to the other at run-time. This feature is not supported in the PowerPC G5. (This is the reason why Virtual PC won't run on the G5 yet.)
      Virtual PC has since been updated for G5 compatibility.
  93. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by kidgenius · · Score: 1
    I know, but the "watercooling" is a good way to get the heat off the processor to put somewhere else.

    Personally, I'm curious if we will have any flaming xboxen.

  94. Where are pix of the guts!?!? by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

    I saw in the infomercial there are a helluva lot of huge fans and the HD unit in this thing is on the side, but what I want to see is the CPU board and such. Anyone got pictures of those things? It would be useful to look at the architecture of this unit in comparison to PS3/XBOX as they are planned for today/are today.

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
  95. IBM and Microsoft, the Opera! by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd like to see an opera about the business relationship between IBM and Microsoft.

    In the first act, IBM is big and indestructible, Big Blue in all its chess king stomping hubris.

    In the second act, blinded by arrogance, IBM casually gives Microsoft the key to over throwing it, first with DOS and then with Windows (which was originally supposed to be a little sister product to OS/2).

    In the third act, IBM goes almost to the edge of bankruptcy. Only at the last second does it pull itself back from the edge by focusing on servers and services.

    In the fourth act, things go crazy! First, IBM (IBM of all companies!) throws its weight behind Linux, in a desperate bid to kill Microsoft. Then IBM teams with Apple to make chips for it (well, OK, this was foreshadowed before, but yeah). Now IBM is once again at the top of the heap, and what do they do?

    Benevolently give Microsoft the chip it will need to take over the video game world!!

    Unless of course they have more of the same production problems they had with the G5. In that case, they'll probably drag MS down with them as they choke each other to death...

    Seriously, who can believe the crazy history these companies have?

  96. Re:Did anybody else waste time watching that show? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    its 3 (Yes three) cores on a single PowerPC chip (with each core running at 3.2 GHz.

    bloody fast, but not as fast as 3 (Yes three) seperate processors.

    Plus its 'custom' so its probably not as fast as a 3.2GHz G5 would be (although it may be faster, but im guessing not)

  97. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to www.xbox.com, this machine has 512 MB of 700 Mhz DDR which is unified, meaning that games may partition it at will between the game code and the video hardware. This is how the original XBox worked.

  98. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by Astatine · · Score: 1

    Aha! Another person to pour cold water onto!

    I very much doubt the 48 figure refers to pipelines as seen in current PC GPUs -- if it did, the GPU would have something like 700 million transistors, that's just improbable!

    I believe ATI's new R5x0 architecture uses "unified shaders" or something (re-uses the same units for pixel and vertex operations). That 48 figure is probably a shader unit count or something. It's better than the current generation, but unlikely to make it 3x faster: perhaps 2x faster, at the outside.

    The Nvidia G70 (to be announced Real Soon Now(TM)) is rumoured to have 2x the performance of the current 6800 series, as well...

  99. Not about the games?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    With the Xbox 360, Microsoft is announcing that it's not just about games anymore.


    Boy! That's just what us gamers wanted to hear! A new gaming console, but it's not just for games! wiippeee! Yahooo! Yehawww!

    /sarcasm

    1. Re:Not about the games?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear! What, they think a gamer would care about a console? Pfff. ;)

  100. XBOX Media Centre Today by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    An XBOX as entertainment centre can be done today using the XBOX Media Centre. It can play pictures, movies, music, start games, XLink access, karaoke, manage your hard drive. As far as I know, It cannot yet function as DVR.

    If this is what you want, you can do this today with $200.

    When XBOX 360 comes out, check to see if the XBMC is good enough for what you need before paying $500-$800 (guesstimate). I would also wait to see what GameCube 2.0 and PlayStation 3 have to offer before buying an XBOX 360.

    If you are a pirate. You have to use XLink to play games because XBOX Live detects modded xboxes. Currently, on PS2, there is no Play Station Live. Every company has its own servers, and they are not as draconian.

  101. Has someone got a torrent as mov or mpeg ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't play this WMV in VLC.

  102. Well let's hope it's not overdone by MobiusX · · Score: 1

    I'm just hoping that this internet business is not overdone. I would hate to see blinking icons telling me updates are ready. And once the update is downloaded it asks me to reboot. As a gamer I am very impatient and cannot take loading time (My main annoyance with games like Half-life 2). So if I have to wait not only for game loading but for downloading updates and such I might just get annoyed. Let's just wait and see.

  103. How about not wasting my money on any of them... by analog_line · · Score: 1

    There are so many good and allright games released for the PS2, GameCube, and even possibly the Xbox, that I can't for the life of me think of a single good reason to spend wads of cash on a next generation system. PS3, Revolution, Xbox, what have you.

    There are already more games in the used section of my local Gamestop for GameCube and PS2 alone than I'd ever be able to finish if I did nothing but play video games for the rest of my life. And even after that I can buy a original Xbox and spend another half a lifetime with those old games.

    I'm getting out of this rat race right now. Check please?

  104. Lightsynth by cyberdba · · Score: 0

    Screenshots and movies of the built in lightsynth from llamasoft are at http://www.llamasoft.co.uk/neon.php

  105. Re:Did anybody else waste time watching that show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three words, "economics of volume".

  106. Obvious question... by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux?

    All kidding aside, it's a tri-core PowerPC computer. We got PowerPC distros. Just mod the kernel, and porting should be eazy.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  107. Because the Dell is in black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had to color it white, because its the spitting image of the Dell:

    http://www.bestbuyjamaica.com/images/Dell%20Optipl ex%20GX260.jpg

  108. Favorite quote by sjonke · · Score: 1

    From 1up.com from page 4, under a picture:

    "Two fans means more power!"

    If only they had put 4 fans in this puppy. Ah well, I guess we'll have to wait for Xbox 720....

    --
    --- What?
  109. $500? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How in the hell is this box supposed to sell for less than $500, even after Microsoft's subsidy? I mean, holy crap. I think either of these things is going on:
    • Those aren't your father's IBM 970s. How much they bear in relation to the 64bit PPCs shipping in Macs I think remains to be seen.
    • Microsoft is going to untold lengths to subsidize these boxes, in the expectation that they'll make it up with Live subscriptions and game licensing. Like cellphone providers.
    • Microsoft could have seriously missed the market. I'm sure they've done extensive market research; they're known for that. Even so, I have hard time believing that anyone is going to pay >$500 for a console. Maybe they know that the the Sony PS3 is going to be $500 too, so they feel safe in developing this kinda thing? Anyways, if it it's more than $150 more than the PS3, I think we can kiss it goodbye, no matter how much it rules.
    If this ships with three real CPUs that are mostly similar to the ones that Apple uses, for less than $500, lots of Apple fanbois, myself included, are going to wonder wtf is up with that, and why Apple can't do the same. I think there is still a lot that remains to be seen.
    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:$500? by Iamthefallen · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is going to untold lengths to subsidize these boxes, in the expectation that they'll make it up with Live subscriptions and game licensing. Like cellphone providers.

      Alternatively, Microsoft takes a short term hit and lose money overall but gain a much stronger foothold of the console market for future releases.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    2. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load. PCs and Macs are on par with each other in hardware, and yes, you pay for the Apple logo. But the performance isn't that drastically different.
      Market share in the gaming business is where MS has failed so far. The sales for XBox weren't that great. They have maybe 13 million sold, same as the Nintendo GameCube. Sony has like 40 million PS2 units sold. The new Nintendo system looks as good as this XBox from what I have read, has the same processors for graphics, and includes complete backward compatibility to GameCube. Sony PS3 is supposed to have the backward compatibility as well, but is based on a different processor they are helping develop with Toshiba and IBM. Nice battle shaping up, but that analyst who claims MS will own 40% of the gaming market by 2010 isn't being very realistic. Or maybe he knows that MS is willing to lose money just to win market share.
      MS will probably never post a profit even if they win market share, they'll dump these things, and then spend million sin advertising and articiles talking about how they won the market with superior technology and innovation. Which will be bull. Let's face it, Joe Schmo will take free crap over well made, moderate priced stuff any day of the week, and that is how MS wins their battles.

    3. Re:$500? by *weasel · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it won't be more than $350.

      They'll eat a big loss on the first run to get it out there as fast as possible and their first price cut is on a version without the hard drive. (maybe bundle a pin compatible flash drive or something)

      Though I think they'd be remiss if they didn't deliver a neXtBox+PVR in the $500 range.

      And if they get Live right, everyone with a wireless keyboard is going to wonder why they spend so much on computers when something like this + HD monitor is good enough for 90% of their computer use. (browsing/mail/chat/games)

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    4. Re:$500? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I might be tempted to buy one for $500 if Linux PPC is made to work. The hardware sounds awesome, except only 512MB RAM.

    5. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Blue is going to make sure the next XBox isn't so easy to hack. IBM ain't your friend.

    6. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey - just ignore the fact that Microsoft has pioneered and cornered the online console gaming experience with Live. Something Sony and Nintendo still haven't mastered. Nintendo are showing no signs of drastically changing their presently failing strategy, and Sony is once again talking like the next PS will save the world - are people going to be fooled like they were with the PS2 (which ended up being a hunk of shit for all the talk)?

    7. Re:$500? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Those aren't your father's IBM 970s. How much they bear in relation to the 64bit PPCs shipping in Macs I think remains to be seen.

      I have yet to see anything, other than the PowerPC moniker and a general idea of clock speed, that would suggest that the Xbox 360's 3-core CPU will resemble the PPC 970's that Apple is using in their modern desktop PCs in any way.

      For all we know, the architecture used in the 360 could simply be a version of the PPC 601's that were in the 1995 "G2" Macs, only running at 3.2GHz instead of 75MHz.

    8. Re:$500? by floodo1 · · Score: 0

      failing strategy?

      you fail to see that live doesnt make game inherently more fun. it offers possibilities, but those must be implemented into a game. and perhaps the time taken to implement online connectivity / features is time sacrificed from other areas of the game.

      you act like xbox isnt just as much a hunk of shit as ps2 is? i'd argue that ps2 is better because altho most of its software library sucks, it still has more games of equal level to the xbox. that is to say ps2 has more mediocre and average games than xbox.

      xbox is a big online piece of shit. games are developed by shitty companies. consumers by it up out of ingnorance (lack of knowledge). and ms marketing wins the world.

      to say that strategy of game production for ps2/3 and nintendo is failing is a false claim for its truly the marketing that is "failing".

      its pretty simple. sony had no business making consoles. and neither did ms.
      but at least sony has been around long enuf and worked with truly masterful game developers so now has enuf vision as a console maker.
      ms still is just about the benjamins.

      nintendo as always is 100% about fun games. if you ever try to deny that you are a fool.

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    9. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For 2 generations in a row?

      Isn't this one supposed to be the money maker?

    10. Re:$500? by AVIDJockey · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to wager that they're going to be aggressive and price it in the sub-$300 range.

      They can't target the 18-25 year olds watching MTV and set it at a price point much higher than that. I have a decent paying job and I'd scoff at paying 500 bucks, never mind a student.

      Speaking of MTV.. It felt really weird watching it last night. I can't remember the last time I tuned in.

    11. Re:$500? by PMW · · Score: 1

      There's no reason why they can't produce this for $500. Consider the following cost saving's they can take advantage of.

      1) Everything goes onto one board, probably just a 4-layer board. There's no need for AGP/PCI/PCI-express/RAM sockets. All that stuff is there to make the motherboard flexible, but with an xbox 360 they're all the same, no need to add/remove anything, so it just get's soldiered straight onto the mobo. That massively reduces the system cost.

      2) They don't need to have serial ports/firewire/PS2, etc. Backwards compatibility is not an issue.

      3) The OS is free :)

      4) The whole system, including video, only has 512MB. That's low compared to a gaming PC.

      5) Small HD (20GB!!).

      6) The power supply can be tailored to their particular needs. Probably right on the mobo as well.

      When you add it all up you can see major cost-savings for a console.

    12. Re:$500? by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, both my girlfriend and I thought that they weren't marketing this to the average 13 year old. They must have been marketing it to a 13 year old with ADD whose parents decided to ween him off ritalin the week they debut the Xbox. I mean, they were doing cutscenes every 5 seconds, and they couldn't play more than 3 or 4 bars of a song before switching to something else. I was disappointed by the lack of content. It would have been nice if Microsoft had put something more technical on Tech TV for those of us in the non-ADHD crowd (or those with it remember to take our medication).

      I've flipped through the channels, and watched MTV in the past year, and it's not nearly that bad most of the time. Also, unless your kid has some kind of mental disorder, I can't imagine what you would have to do to them to give them an attention span that low. We're talking about serious neglect.

    13. Re:$500? by gabebear · · Score: 1
      With multi-threading, strange altivec, and 3 cores per chip these don't look like they will have much in common with the G5 or Power4.

      The only thing I could see resmbling specs for the CPU are at IGN:

      Custom IBM PowerPC-based CPU:
      • 3 symmetrical cores running at 3.2 GHz each
      • 2 hardware threads per core; 6 hardware threads total
      • 1 VMX-128 vector unit per core; 3 total
      • 128 VMX-128 registers per hardware thread
      • 3 symmetrical cores running at 3.2 GHz each
      • 1 MB L2 cache
      VMX is IBM's name for Altivec. Does each VMX unit on the Xbox360 have 256 registers(128 per hardware thread)? The G5(PPC970) has 2 VMX units with 32 registers each(64 VMX registers total). Up until now I think all VMX/Altivec CPUs have had 32 registers per unit.

      If the PS3's CELL CPU is going to have 1024 128bit registers per CPU then the Xbox360 may have 768 total.

      The amount of RAM is really impressive to me, having 512MB+10MB to play around with is going to make for some pretty crap.
    14. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know... I think 3 dual-core 3.2GHz processors are going to be pretty expensive.

    15. Re:$500? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      "If this ships with three real CPUs that are mostly similar to the ones that Apple uses, for less than $500, lots of Apple fanbois, myself included, are going to wonder wtf is up with that, and why Apple can't do the same. "

      how many times do people on /. have to answer this question.

      supply and demand have little to do with pricing.

      perhaps you've heard of "what the market will bear"?

      they sell it for that price because they can.

      and you buy it at that price because you vote with your wallet...

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    16. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That IS supply and demand...

    17. Re:$500? by Glonk · · Score: 1

      The Xbox 360's CPU is derived from the POWER5.

      The PowerPC 970 (G5) is derived from the POWER4.

    18. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt!!!

      You lose. Go back to teamxbox.com fanboy.

    19. Re:$500? by gabebear · · Score: 1

      What an interesting dream world you must live in...

    20. Re:$500? by Glonk · · Score: 1

      It's not a dreamworld.

      Do you really think IBM would put all the R&D of putting SMT into an old core? Power5 already has it.

      The Xbox 360 CPU is a castrated Power5, like the G5/PowerPC is a castrated Power4.

    21. Re:$500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither Sony nor Nintendo has blown a billion dollars and ended up in third place. And as far as "pioneer" in the game industry, MS doesn't qualify just for throwing hardware in that was better, and online gaming already existed, consoles just weren't the place for it. Still aren't for the most part. Nintendo still has the most fun experience, and Sony has the catalog and easily the best brand right now. MS still has a long battle ahead.

    22. Re:$500? by gabebear · · Score: 1

      It's not a dreamworld.

      Do you really think IBM would put all the R&D of putting SMT into an old core? Power5 already has it.

      The Xbox 360 CPU is a castrated Power5, like the G5/PowerPC is a castrated Power4.


      Wow, sorry for the sarcasm, but WTF?
      The G5(PPC970) is just a single core of the Power4 with Ativec(VMX) bolted on.

      The Power5 currently maxs out at 1.65ghz.

      It is odd that they bothered to put SMT in the XBox360, but that's hardly proof that the design is ANYTHING like the Power5. The only reason I can fathom SMT made it into the CPU is because they made some serious short cuts elsewhere that make it really hard to optimize for(no out of order execution, extremely small caches, etc).

  110. Why would they bother? by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    I can't see why they would bother, XBox wasn't a big success, and the games that were sold for the XBox are the same ones being sold for the new one.

    Call of Duty *2*
    Quake *4*
    Tiger Woods PGA Tour *06*
    NBA *2K6*
    Project Gotham Racing *3*
    Anal sluts *9*

    I reckon they just can't admit it, without killing off sales of the XBox so they talk vague.
    Whose going to support the XBox if its an end of line product like the Dreamcast?

  111. Shaved XBOX by llZENll · · Score: 1

    or XBOX Shaved, a much better name :D

  112. Nintendo also by Luthair · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nintendo is also using PowerPC, I believe they're using 4x 2.5 GHz

    1. Re:Nintendo also by purple_cobra · · Score: 1

      ISTR reading it was five PPCs. If this is true it may well need to be housed in an aluminium case. :)

  113. I hate writers. by sootman · · Score: 1

    from http://money.cnn.com/2005/05/12/technology/persona ltech/xbox360/index.htm?cnn=yes: "But the real multimedia functionality ties in with the 360's wireless capabilities. The machine will automatically connect and stream digital media -- including video and digital pictures -- stored on any PC running Windows XP."

    And this differs from what can be done with regular wired ethernet... how? Thanks for regurgitating MS's press release, fucktards.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:I hate writers. by oneiron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chris Morris is one of the better writers out there. He stay's pretty connected to gamers via the shacknews comments community.

      This does differ from what can be done with 'a regular wired ethernet.' How many people have their wireless networks hooked up to their living room entertainment center? To be able to do something like that without 3rd party software or hardware mods is nice.

    2. Re:I hate writers. by springMute · · Score: 1

      I agree. Chris is not your regular stupid mainstream news writer, the guy know what he's talking about.

      Granted, he's at CNN, so he has to write CNN-speak.

  114. Nvidia is the problem... by CalTrumpet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    XBox games don't use a full 3D abstraction layer, like many DirectX or OpenGL games do. They are directly targeted (and optimized) for the Nvidia GPU, and the firmware and GPU compiler technology for the first XBox's graphics system probably belongs to Nvidia.

    After such a big embarassing loss to ATI on the X360, it is highly unlikely that Nvidia would agree to license their technology for inclusion in a software emulator on the new platform.

    Interestingly enough, MSFT has made some acquisitions over the last couple of years that point to building such emulation (VirtualPC, JIT scode conversion technologies), but it might be for naught if there is a legal barrier on the graphics chip.

    I know, sucks.

    1. Re:Nvidia is the problem... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I don't think NVidia even wanted to be MS's partner for the X360* considering how MS ripped them off on the XBox GPUs.

      *= The name is probably inspired because MS can't get anything right in two tries and they hope to break that curse.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Nvidia is the problem... by samkass · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, virtually every point in the parent post is incorrect. 1. The primary 3D API promoted by Microsoft for the original XBox is, in fact, a version of DirectX 8. 2. Nvidia reportedly did not even bid on the next XBox contract because they got burned so badly by the first one due to the XBox's low demand. Microsoft had to go begging to ATI. 3. The most recent release of VirtualPC on the Macintosh reportedly had video card drivers for DirectX 8 calls that could do hardware emulation for games, before the feature was pulled for time-to-market concerns... and since Microsoft owns DirectX, there wouldn't be any legal concerns.

      By the way, according to c|net, the demo'ed XBox content was all running on Macintosh G5's. Although the release version will be clocked faster (although probably a simpler, non-out-of-order CPU core,) it's reasonable to speculate on what the XBox will be able to emulate by speculating on what VirtualPC on the Mac might be capable of with hardware DirectX 8.

      --
      E pluribus unum
  115. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by radish · · Score: 1

    The polygon performance of the Xbox 360 is as high as 500 million triangles per second, which means the Xbox 360 can process aproximately 1.2 billion vertices per second. In comparison, the GeForce 6800 Ultra can process 600 million vertices per second. Want more numbers? The Xbox 360 has a pixel fillrate of 16 gigasamples per second using 4X multisampling anti-aliasing (MSAA) and a shader performance of 48 billion shader operations per second.

    Quote is from teamxbox.xom. Personally, I don't call twice as fast as a 6800 Ultra "not much for graphics". This thing is going to fly.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  116. Looks like Bunnie's been thinking about this by jackstack · · Score: 1
  117. Wrong! by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    But the current Xbox has been emulating the previous generation: PSX and N64 for years now! I don't think there is a Dreamcast emulator, but technically, the Dreamcast is in the same generation as the Xbox... remember, Sega wanted to jump into the next generation really early?

    So you are wrong. I bet the new Xbox could use software emulation to support old games. However, I doubt there will be an official software emulator.

  118. Duke Nukem Forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I choked when I saw Duke Nukem Forever listed as one of the titles.

  119. Physics Hardware? by dep01 · · Score: 1

    I was reading about PPU in a magazine the other day... It's a separate PCI card that handles physics in video games (to be utilized more and more).

    Does the XBOX 360 or PS3 have any special hardware to handle *just* the in-game physics?

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  120. White and Smooth... hmmmm, hello Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the shining new Microsoft games console will blend smartly with... your Apple hardware?
    Is it me or have MS decided to help Apple with their lack of gaming by providing them with a matching games console?

    Who knows, maybe they reckond the iPod was a blast cus it was white and shiny.

    Either way, if you're a fasion concious Mac user, you now have some gaming power to go with it

  121. Stripped down cores? by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    I don't know. If the onboard CPU cooler is efficient enough it shouldn't matter.

    Take a closer look at the video and some of the pictures that have been floating around. There is a Dell-style hood that encloses the CPU/Cooler and a fan at the back of the unit. I'd say the heat is totally managable.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  122. Why not 365? by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

    They're expecting us to take 5 days away from gaming each year?

    --
    tone
    1. Re:Why not 365? by mimio · · Score: 1

      " They're expecting us to take 5 days away from gaming each year?"

      Yes, because 5 days is what you will be spending each year rebooting the new XBox

  123. Virusscan by UberLeo · · Score: 1

    I bet we are going to have to pay extra for MS Virus protection on the box!

  124. Okay, let me try... by ABaumann · · Score: 1

    There are already pleanty of games out there for the PS2, and not many that are available solely for XBox. I mean, there's Halo 2, but who would want to play that? There really aren't any good games out there for the XBox, and FPSs just SUCK on consoles. (3,8) It's so obvious that PS2 is better then XBox. I mean, they only sold like 40 XBoxen (6) in Europe and Japan. (7)

    Besides, Bill Gates is evil. He spends too much time talking about products and graphics and stuff, and he's really rich. That asshole! (10) Microsoft can't even make an operating system that works! And they're EVIL! They use slave labor to build their rice box. (6, 11) In Soviet Russia, you own M$. (11, standard /.)

    The biggest problem on the XBox is the graphics. I mean, IANAL, (standard /.) but the best game erer was pong. Since they've started adding bettter graphics, the playability has just suffered. (8, 9)

    Oh, and my Sweedish super model internet girlfriend was supposed to come to prom with me, but they wouldn't let her get on the plane because she had her XBox and they've had trouble with them exploding on airplanes. True story. (10, 11)

    Note: It would have beeen helpful if I could have said something like "I, for one, welcome our new XBox 360 overlords." Also mentioning the terms Mircosoft and FUD would be helpful. OH! And we totally forgot to attack it from the Apple angle too! It's got PowerPC chips in it, and we all know that PowerPC chips are used in Macs, and Macs suck at gaming!

    --
    I'm sorry for wasting your time, but hey, you are reading slashdot.

  125. ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    externally this new xbox is really ugly.
    you would think by now that Microsoft would have
    learned a lesson from Apple that design does matter.
    external as well as internal.

    too ugly for my house.
    pass on this one.

  126. cools bits from register article by ARWK · · Score: 1
    Two snippets of information from the register http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/13/ms_xbox_36 0

    Crucially, there's a liquid cooling system to keep all this stuff from melting.

    Liquid cooling for computers finally hitting the main-stream!

    Quake 4 was previewed on it last night

    Previewed? Given its Q4 release date I assume that it will not be available at time of launch (summer in US?)

  127. MTV, I want my 30 minutes back by technopinion · · Score: 1

    What a lame "unveiling" that was.
    Here's a rundown:
    MTV: Look, a live performance by The Killers.
    Me: Who? What does this have to do with the Xbox 360?
    MTV: Look at how the Monster Garage guys modded an original Xbox!
    Me: What does this have to do with the Xbox 360?
    MTV: Look, here's some pro gamers getting a tour of a game studio, and trying out some motion capture stuff.
    Me: What does this have to do with the Xbox 360? Oh, they're playing a game on it. Wow, those graphics and gameplay look just like stuff I've seen on PS2 and Xbox 2 years ago.
    MTV: Look, here's the gamers having a deathmatch competition.
    Me: WTF MTV? I don't care what the gamers look like while they're playing, show me the game!
    MTV: Well, that's it, now that you know everything about the Xbox 360, here's another live performance by The Killers!
    Me: Did I blink and miss the Xbox 360?

    1. Re:MTV, I want my 30 minutes back by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      Ditto.

      I learned nothing. Actually, I lie. I learned that Microsoft knows nothing about the game industry. Gamers want demos, clips, and specs. Not 3rd rate bands and Frodo's outing as a corporate bitch.

      I think E3 competition will let us know who really holds the cards in the next round.

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

  128. I think I'll wait for PS3 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    or the new GameCube

    No real games to speak of, other than the existing Fable.

    Sorry, just not that interesting from my viewpoint. If I wanted to play football, I'd go outside and play it here at the UW.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  129. Re:Alt OS by klubar · · Score: 1

    The real question is whether someone will hack it to run Mac OS X? It's a (custom) PowerPC. Perhaps this is a stealth anti-mac move by MS.

  130. a '360' with IBM chips? by number6x · · Score: 1

    Wow!

    An IBM '360' that fits on top of my TV.

    Now I can dust of that old JCL book from Gary DeWard Brown and run some IEFBR14's to test it out.

    Does anyone know if this comes with a copy of MVS or OS/360?

    People always said MS would beat IBM one day, now they're up to the mid '70s of IBM technology. It should only take about 30 more years for them to be on par with big blue :)

    For the sarcastically impared, this post is a joke.

  131. Re:Variant Strokes For Varying Folks by Arren · · Score: 1

    "There are already more games in the used section of my local Gamestop for GameCube and PS2 alone than I'd ever be able to finish if I did nothing but play video games for the rest of my life." Maybe you should stick to what you're good at.

  132. Another site with screen caps by jedimasta · · Score: 0

    Yeah, its a pathetic plug for my own site, but the images are original (as is the commentary) http://media-geeks.com/?content=showarticle&articl eID=854

    --
    Who is more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows?
  133. Subtle Brian Regan reference.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plural of XBox is XBoxen. Brilliant!!!

  134. Exactly. Krylon is your friend by jwigum · · Score: 1

    I think it's time to purchase some cans of Krylon in preparation for the release :) Maybe something to spray on the underside, for some neato "nonskid grip"

    Besides, the first thing you want to do is void the warranty :)

    --

    Look behind you...

  135. What the ?! by RichardX · · Score: 1

    I just watched the Ourcolony video
    The marketspeak is unbelievable. Apparently the Xbox 360 has a "very distinctive iconic gesture". And a button that, when you press it and "this whole new world of opportunity opens up"
    Well damn, THAT sounds pretty amazing. Whazzit do, like, open a wormhole in the spacetime continuum or something?
    Nope. just takes you to the media centre. Oh well.

    Oh. And they want us, the users to "Take the XBox 360 and make it ours", they want us to do stuff they never dreamed of with it, to customise, and create.
    Really? Then why are you locking it down and DRMing it to hell and back?
    If you really want me to create stuff, leave it unlocked. Or at least let me install a modchip.

    If they were a bit more honest, they'd have said
    "I'm a slightly lonely middle aged man with absolutely no connection to todays youth. Sometimes I ride my Segway up and down the corridors for hours at a time. Then I go home and cry myself to sleep."

    "Hey. I'm female and blonde. I didn't have anything to do with the development of this console but we're gonna pretend I'm a hardcore gamer for the sake of widespread appeal"

    Then, of course, there's the M4d tr3ndy d00d. The less said about him the better, I think though.

    Still, looks like a pretty neat console. The hardware is impressive enough, and I might get the console when it comes out.. but I'll pass on the Xbox 360 Paradigim Shift Life Gaming Experience (TM), thanks

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:What the ?! by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      If you want to convince yourself that Allard is some kind of lonely loser then go ahead. Last time I checked he was fairly well connected, had a decent position in the games industry and is most likely richer than anyone posting in this thread (maybe even all of us combined). But, hey don't let you Slashgoggles color your perception.

  136. Totally Underwhelming by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    Graphics on par with current titles, Tiger Woods seemed poor in the grass textures, Kameo looks poor (this was the one game I was looking forward to since it was supposed to release for the Gamecube.) cartoony, blocky, current gen graphics, the only addition was "bloom" effect which most people hate anyhow. Pathetic.

    3 3.2GHz procs, big gpu specs, big price, and the rest... what's it get you? Not too much more than you get now from an Xbox, PS2, or PC. Better have more than Perfect Dark Zero to pull this off... and they don't besides Condemned which isn't a mass appeal title. Thumbs Down.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Totally Underwhelming by xombo · · Score: 1

      Kameo is coming from Microsoft Game Studios. I doubt it was going to be on the GameCube.

    2. Re:Totally Underwhelming by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      No you are totally wrong. Kameo Elements of Power Was and is created by RARE ltd. Which is who made Donkey Kong Country, etc. and was Nintendo only. They were set to release Kameo on the gamecube and then Microsoft bought the entire company so Kameo was then supposed to come out on the Xbox 1, it never did, now it is set for the XBOX 360.

      I'm a member of the videogame media so I'm quite positive... maybe you should do a bit more research before you post, oh, yeah, this is Slashdot where no one needs to actually know what they are talking about.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  137. Re:Did anybody else waste time watching that show? by Nimloth · · Score: 0

    Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ';', expecting ')' in comments.pl on line 648

  138. What a great and innovative name by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


    First the PS(/)2, now the 360... what's with gaming consoles being named after older IBM hardware?

    If the Nintendo's next console ends up being branded the "Nintendo AS400", I'm gonna VARY OFF and not come back.

    1. Re:What a great and innovative name by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      heh, they might name the next gameboy the gameboy junior........

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  139. more than one teraflop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the anandtech article:

    the new Xbox 360 offers "more than one teraflop of system-floating point performance" driven by a "three-core PowerPC-based CPU."

    Is this a typo, or am I missing something? I thought teraflops were still pretty firmly in the range of supercomputers.

    1. Re:more than one teraflop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has it written on their official Xbox site. I don't know.

      This is a top list of super computers. Speed there is in GFlops, so divide by 1000 to convert to TFlops.

      Going down to the first super-computer that has about 1TFlop of THEORETICAL maximum speed, I see this:

      SGI Altix 1.3 GHz
      208 processors (!)
      Year: 2003

      That's not shabby for the Xbox 360 to match up to. Or, put another way, it's only 1/70th the power of the fastest super-computer in the world.

  140. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

    All I gotta say is that I *LOVE* my HD games! They do look a lot different in HD than those that do not support it. I won't buy a game that isn't 1080i. When you're kicking much ass in Unreal Championship - you can see the robot pieces smoking and flying off, as well as every missle that shoots you in the HEED!!!!! *skipping rockets off your head!!* Look for me on XBL baby!! I support you on quitting smoking!!!

    --
    Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  141. Do the math by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    (XBox) 360 > (Playstation) 3

    1. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still in grade 2?

  142. Sliding and folding apartments. by mikael · · Score: 1

    Yikes! Living in an apartment where everything folds or slides into everything else would be like living inside a Chinese puzzle or Pinhead's box or "The Cube". I'd hate having to remember the right sequence of moves to find my front door.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  143. Versions... by silverhalide · · Score: 1

    The real reason it's "XBox 360" - XBox's 2 through 359 were scrapped in beta testing.

  144. This sums it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is my favorite quote from Gary Whitta:

    "If I was Bill Gates I would have called a meeting of all senior Xbox staff some time ago and said "Right, so tell me all about the Halo title we're releasing at launch."

    And when they had nothing to say I would have fired the fucking lot of them. "

  145. 169 XBOXs sold in Japan last week by dstyle5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    7. Be sure and mention Japanese and European sales numbers. If you aren't sure what those sales numbers are, go ahead and make something up. Estimate low, most people will believe you.

    According to this http://game-science.com/news/001076.html/ article, the XBOX sold a whopping 169 units in Japan last week, and 6,529 for the whole year. At the other end of the spectrum, the Nintendo DS sold 67,863 units last week. Clearly the XBOX is not doing very well in Japan.

    *** Disclaimer - I own a xb0KZzzz ;)

  146. ...not Intel by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is interesting, isn't it, that nobody is now using Intel who is not locked into it by a commitment to legacy code? All 3 new game machines are using PowerPC processors.

    And I wouldn't be surprised if the OS of XBox360 is based on Windows. Perhaps Microsoft will follow Apple's example with the 68K to PowerPC transition and release a PowerPC based Windows PC that runs old applications in emulation.

    After all, they already own VirtualPC...

    1. Re:...not Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're a smart guy.... if you only knew how close you were....

    2. Re:...not Intel by devinoni · · Score: 1

      Microsoft had a port of NT for PowerPC once upon a time.

    3. Re:...not Intel by 2ms · · Score: 1

      Don't forget MS still hates IBM and considers them their biggest corporate enemy especially post IBM's huge commitment to Linux. I doubt IBM is making much at the most severely discounted rates they are letting these chips go for.

      Remember Intel didn't make a damn thing on the Xbox1 they only decided to be part of it at the last minute when they didn't want to take chances of AMD benefiting from MS endorsement and trust in eye of consumer. That was back when overwhelming majority of consumers still thought of AMD as 2nd rate clones and yet Athlon was kicking Pentium3's ass techwise but average joe still had tremendous fear and doubt regarding AMD and Intel wanted to keep it that way even if it meant agreeing to an otherwise loser deal. The XBox was originally designed with Athlon in mind in fact I think this was how NVidia got started on making AMD chipsets aka NForce. XBox1 still used AMD internal bus design aka HyperTransport

  147. Slight pedantry by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

    The 601 was first generation or "G1", and ran from 1994-1995. The 603e and 604e were the second generation or "G2" and ran from 1995 to 1997.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  148. VPC and PPC Xbox by lullabud · · Score: 1

    I think you're right. They're probably trying to get it to work, but aren't promising it just in case they can't. They did, however, buy Connectix, the makers of Virtual PC. This was likely because they wanted people who had experience with both PPC and x86, but wether that was merely for the Xbox 360 or for reverse compatibility is anyone's guess. Perhaps if they can't get it working on the first release of the Xbox 360 they'll release an application whenever they get it working and let people download it from that new 360 button guide thingy that is supposed to let you do everything.

  149. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by jackstack · · Score: 1
    - IMB PowerPC based CPU with three cores at 3.2 Ghz apiece (...dang!)

    Does this mean it's got three processors? What does triple core mean? I dunno - I'm asking.

  150. Do Not Eat iBox by lullabud · · Score: 1

    For that they'd have to copy a dislcaimer from Apple too: Do not eat iBox.

  151. Awesome Microsoft debut . . . by superultra · · Score: 1

    . . . of the Killers! They were awesome and completely off the hook! I can't wait until their good album comes out!

  152. Saved Games? by Taulin · · Score: 1

    Even if it is backwards compatible...how am I supposed to get my DOA:Extreme Vollyball saved games ported to the new system?

  153. I thought the same thing by Physician · · Score: 0

    When he said "and now the future of gaming" and that hot blonde walked by I thought "she's the future of gaming? SWEET!"

    Apparently every person on the planet who saw that was thinking the same thing as per Zonk's post. If you also thought that then respond to this post.

    --
    Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
  154. Comparison by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of comparing cars. Let's say an Xbox is a ford and PS3 a BMW.
    Ford released a new model in competition to BMW. It's got a much bigger engine, the same leathery luxury, it goes faster and handles better. Some people will buy it because it's value for money.
    Others will think "Hey, it's still a ford" No matter how good it is, it's just not a BMW.
    And then BMW releases their new model.And it's beautiful and fast. And people buy it just because it's a BMW. So, I'm sorry.Yes, the specs are very good and it looks like value for money, but it still has that Microsoft badge. I'll wait for the BMW.
    Disclaimer: Please replace "BMW" with whatever is your preferred luxury car brand.
    And "Ford" with whatever is your lesser, not quite as good brand.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    1. Re:Comparison by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      That's a dumb comparison.

      The games are what matter.

      No one wants a BMW if there are no raods to drive it on.

    2. Re:Comparison by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      Honestly, from any perspective a PS2 is NOT a BMW.

  155. Backward Compatible? I think not.. by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 1

    However nothing is said ANYWHERE about if this guy will be backwards compatible to the current model. I'm going to guess it won't be, since it has different processor etc.

    --
    Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
  156. It's just another MS copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's typical MS. The PS2 can stand on it's side, that must be what gamers want! And then simply outdo them on specs.

    It looks like a fat PS2 made by Apple wannabes.

  157. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh come on...that is at best "raw power". No game will seriously use that power. They aren't telling us the real numbers...the "useful polygon" count. I bet you its not so high as the numbers they are praising.

    Besides...what good is a system with all that power if it will be a long time before developers are able to even make use of that power?

    Its the games that matter - not the system. I will wait to see what the games are like before I proclaim the Xbox 360 as God's next gift to mankind (the first apparently having been Halo to many people).

  158. Re:For teh fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't a troll guide, it speaks the truth.

    Like #10, my xbox is giving me a lot of "This disk can not be read, blah blah insert a real xbox disk" errors, you think this is made up? There isn't a fucking scratch on that Halo disk or any other game, yet it frequently gives this error.

    Just goes to show, don't get a first generation system. I will especially not get one from Microsoft.

  159. Music store for Xbox? by lullabud · · Score: 1

    The ITMS is never going to be Apple's primary revenue stream. It's just barely holding at the break-even point. It's being held afloat by iPod revenue, which is itself still dwarfed by Apple's computer business.

    That's exactly what I was going to say...

    Along those lines, it would make perfect sense for MS to allow your Xbox 360 to have it's Live subscription tied in with a subscription music service which would sync to a Rio or whatever, as well as let you play songs through your stereo and possibly in games. It would essentially give them a subscription based alternative to the ITMS, and on top of that it already has a large client base who are already paying a monthly subscription fee. I can see the labels eating this one up because it's just tacking on a subtle fee for the end user and diverting some of the cash flow. And, I can see how Xbox users would love the service. It ties music selection into a device which they feel very comfortable using.

  160. Has slashdot got a bad grammar checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ACCEPT that your grammar is wrong fool!

  161. Such an appropriate commercial by Physician · · Score: 0

    Did anyone catch the commercial for Kotex tampons and pads during the xbox360 show? How appropriate since that is exactly what the xbox360 looks like.

    --
    Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
  162. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by LordStraun · · Score: 1

    Means it's got a single CPU "Chip" which contains three actual CPU cores.

    In a very general sense, you could look at it as having three separate CPUs. However, depending on how those CPUs are architected, they may have to fight over memory bandwidth and other system resources (a-la Intel). Or they may use a much more efficent design, like AMD's HyperTransport.

    Regardless, it's still a crapload of processing power. Hopefully the CPU design isn't crippled by the rest of the hardware.

    --
    Your Sig Here ($10)
  163. Whatr u talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thoz arnt trolls, ther real. I spend enuf time on my xbox and the intrnet to be an expert. Yr just one of them scoolboys that trys to look good an cover up that yr just a wonkr for m$. Spend less time in the library and more in the intrnet lik me. Shure you wont be getting Az anymore but then yull not sound so stupid to us.

    1. Re:Whatr u talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lame attempt, MS fanboy. But then, I wouldn't expect an MS fanboy to be capable of any better than this anyway.

  164. If your PS1 breaks, what do you do? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what percentage of people playes PS1 games on their PS2? If you upgrade from your existing console, why not keep your old console around?

    Consoles break, and the makers eventually stop production. Once your PS1 bites the big one, you still have a PS2 to play your existing library of PS1 games (except possibly for Tomba! and about a dozen others that Sony couldn't get 100 percent working). Or where can I buy a new Super NES?

    And if you're new to the console, why would you buy old games?

    Unlike the Final Fantasy compilations, not all classic games are re-released for all consoles. Where can I buy, say, Tecmo Bowl for GameCube?

    Of course, Apple and Sony could band together.

    If Apple and Sony BMG were to enter an agreement with any level of exclusivity, then EMI, Universal, and Warner would feel left out.

  165. Disadvantage to console internal DVD player by tepples · · Score: 1

    look at how the gamecube suffered because it refused to consider the implications of the future, i.e. dvd playback.

    The Nintendo GameCube video game console is sold at the price of one of the other consoles minus the price of an entry-level DVD player. This lets you buy a DVD Video player separately from your console so that you can use them on two separate screens, which is useful if you want to play while someone else in the house is watching a 12 hour Meg Ryan marathon.

  166. That is a bug. by tepples · · Score: 1

    [In GTA San Andreas,] if you drive super fast you're going faster than the CD can access/load the data [seems odd]. Thus the game engine just renders transparent surfaces.

    Then why couldn't the game engine render plain Gouraud shaded surfaces like PS1 and N64 games did for objects whose textures hadn't loaded?

    1. Re:That is a bug. by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You'd have to ask a Rockstar developer. Chances are there is memory for the texture it's just zeroed [e.g. zero alpha == transparent] maybe ?

      All I know is with radio off the cd will seek/read/etc when you drive super fast [more than if you just sit still] and it's the best explanation my feeble mind could come up with. /me not feeling particularly good today... arrg.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  167. Amonia Cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not actual "water cooling" it is a heat pipe which has water in it, it also has amonia in it.

    http://hardocp.com/ Check the announcement.

    This is just marketing for PC ricers who think watercooling is "leet".

  168. Or the next Genesis... by Sprotch · · Score: 1

    Or the next Genesis. Or Playstation.

  169. DVD Upconversion?? by Obi+Quiet · · Score: 1

    But will the DVD playback upconvert to 720p and 1080i??? What about the Video and Audio out specs?? HDMI? DVI? Component? Will XBOX (1) HD component cables plug into the 360, or is the interface completely new?

  170. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by mink · · Score: 1

    It means that the single processor chip has three processing cores.
    This is akin to current POWER PC chips like in the P Series hardwareline that each physical processor has two cores. The system reports that it has 2 processors from a physical hardware standpoint, but when running any software that counts the number of processors they see twice as many. For example a two processor machine shows up as having four cpus when running topas or nmon.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  171. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by jjohnson · · Score: 1

    I'm going to buy four, just so I can sex with three of them at once.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  172. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by kafka47 · · Score: 1

    But.. you just need one to have sex with three, cause there are three cores. Unless you want to have sex with twelve, then go ahead and buy four. l-eight-r! /Kafka

  173. A true troll leader by lullabud · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's a tactic called "Leading By Example" that is meant to stir up morale among the trolls. He's very good at it, to be sure. Several times I was tempted to hit the reply link and flame his dereliction of elementary grammar and spelling. Alas, if i'd been foolish enough to do so he'd have won. They'd all have won. In fact, the very act of wasting precious time pining over these subtle aggravations is a sign that the trolls may already be winning a cold war.

  174. lame presentation, lame box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The presentation was on the lame side and the specs of the Xbox 360 look pretty bad given all the hype Microsoft has been creating.

    I can't wait to see the final specs of the PS3 which will beat the Xbox 360 in terms of performance several times. In fact, any serious gamer will wait a couple more months and get the PS3.

  175. Microsoft isn't selling 3.0+ GHz CPUs yet, either by Ideaphile · · Score: 1

    It's still six or seven months (minimum) before Xbox 360 ships. In that time, you can expect speed bumps for the PowerMac line. You may see dual-core chips, or dual-threaded chips, or both. Microsoft had to preannounce the specs of Xbox 360 so developers would know the performance targets. Apple doesn't preannounce much of anything about hardware specs.

  176. Reference to IBM 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name must be a reference to the old IBM System 360 mainframe. The 360 stood for "the full circle of computing". Microsoft is trying to imply that they will be as important in the console market as IBM was in the mainframe market. This is a huge claim to make, given their second place status so far. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?IbmSystemThreeSixty for details.

  177. Re:Excel Spreadsheet by klubar · · Score: 1

    I play the excel spreadsheet game everyday. It comes in a number of varients...how much would you like the number to be? How can I use excel for a database? How many subtle bugs can I find (or leave) in spreadsheet? How slow can a make it recalculate?

    Excel is a great tool for looking busy without doing anything productive.

    Actually...correctly used excel is one of the best business applications ever.

  178. Re:30 minutes? Actually its an infomercial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The entire premise of MTV is to show informercials (aka music videos).

    MTV doesn't play music videos, oddly enough. MTV2 used to, but they seem to be stopping now.

    Videos were a fad. Many bands simply don't make them anymore.

  179. Xbox... 360? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

    What happened to the other 358 versions?

    Seriously though, folks, this name is very telling. As there are 360 degrees in a circle (no doubt how they chose the name), it means that Microsoft is simply going round and round in circles. A downward spiral, you might call it...

    1. Re:Xbox... 360? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After last night's disastrous 'unveiling' the name seems apt,

      Xbox 360 - Circling The Bowl

  180. MAC OS X on XBOX 360? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read a story that MS was using a G5 to demo some games.

    If MS is subsudizing the new XBOX, and if apple was to makes OS X avaible for the XBOX, imagine the losses that MS can rack up!

  181. a cheap workstation by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    The cost of any gaming console system is far LESS than the production cost. This is because the real money in this industry is in licensing. This means people who buy and re-purpose a console are effectively getting more hardware than they paid for. (Using Big Media's warped logic, I'm "stealing" from the console manufacturer because I could have dumped tons of money on games to help reimburse them).

    I would easily pay $400 for a triple-core proccessor at 3.2GHz with super-fast HDTV graphics. Only needs more RAM (GDDR3 is customized for graphics; where's the normal kind?) and disk space (assuming the hard drive is SATA or IDE, that's a hundred bucks for a 160+GB drive). Still costs nothing.

    The only problem here is that, as evidenced by the 3dO, a console that costs big bucks flops. Microsoft is pulling out of the gaming industry if this costs $400 when others are $300 or less. If it's not popular enough, I may never see GNU/Linux on it. What a shame.

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  182. 3.2 GHz? Has APPLE heard of that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been waiting for years for Apple to push past 2 GHz and meanwhile there's been a 3.2 GHz core just sitting around?

  183. And the winner is ... Apple by podperson · · Score: 1

    What's the killer app for Windows? It's games. Heck, plenty of Mac users own a PC just to play games on. I upgrade my PCs (which are pretty much only used for games) more often than my Mac (which I use for work).

    Next, folks who write games for XBox 360 will be learning to optimize code for PowerPC hardware, and it's not exactly obvious how easy it will be to develop for PC and XBox 360 at once ... so it will be easier to port games to Macs.

    Next, whether XBox 360 or PS3 wins, the PowerPC market is going to expand hugely, making volumes bigger, performance better, and unit prices lower.

    So Macs get cheaper and fast, people have less reason to buy or upgrade PCs, and game developers will be learning to code for the PowerPC.

  184. Xbox 360 is a monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that anyone is going to argue that the three 3.2GHz core PowerPC based CPU is one that can supply almost unlimited power in terms of today's and tomorrow's games. Add in the fact that there are 2 threads per core and that should allow for game developers to stay busy for quite some time. I have discussed parrellism and programming for game content with developers and the biggest problem from them is figuring out to use all the current CPU power that is present. The CPU is in the Xbox 360 is going to give the device longevity probably never before seen in a game console.

    There really has not been much information shared on the Graphic Processing Unit and I would not expect more precise details till E3 next week. At that time, look to ATI to open up and discuss their role in the Xbox 360 and the technology they designed in a much more open fashion. Issues as to how the shader engine works, what exactly 3D logic on the embedded DRAM does to offload the GPU, and exactly how the memory bus works will all hopefully come to light.

    If you compare the current ATI X850 XT PE to the Xbox 360 GPU, you will find that while the Xbox GPU is a bit slower in fill rate, it is a good bit faster in shader operations in seconds. No doubt this points to what is more important in Xbox 360 game design.

    I think what is most important to remember when thinking about console hardware is the lack of diversity when compared to PC hardware. Game developers that program for the PC have to deal with literally thousands if not tens of thousands of hardware configurations. Now consider a game content team developing for Xbox 360. They know exactly what hardware they will have in place to execute their game flawlessly and are now able to program to fully exploit their base of hardware without worrying about compatibility issues. This allows the developer to add features to a console that simply would not be possible to implement across all PC platforms and configurations. Considering the multithreading aspect of the Xbox 360, I still have some questions as to how this is going to impact porting native Xbox 360 games to the PC. Time will tell.

    As far as cooling goes, I know that the cooling I saw on a non-working motherboard did not look to be sufficient for cooling either the CPU or the GPU, but they did stress that their cooling would be sufficient and it would be as quiet if not quieter than the original Xbox. I think we are just going to have to wait and see what comes out in production.

    The removable and upgradeable hard drive will be a great feature for those of you that found huge save game files to be a hindrance when trying to store your games or take your games with you. Of course downloadable data will also be stored on the hard drive as well. The removable hard drive can be seen on the very top of the Xbox 360 when it is in a vertical orientation and is in a type of cassette casing. Obviously this will be proprietary and I would expect to see all sorts of deep security in order to make sure that downloadable content does not get easily distributed.

    Also a very cool feature of the controllers is that they can all power on the Xbox 360 at the touch of a button.

    Software & Gaming

    The Xbox 360 Gamer Guide and System Guide interfaces are svelte works of art. They are seamless and smooth and look exceptionally easy to master and utilize. This is of course is what Microsoft realizes is a holy grail in the console market if they want to dominate.

    It has been voiced to us from more than one source that Xbox 360 gaming is going to be a leap across a generational gaming gap if not two. We will undoubtedly know more next week.

    One "uber-cool" feature that was discussed by Jay Allard was the introduction of episodic games and game pilots. Think of these in terms of what we see now on TV. This could not only be a boon for the gamer but also work to keep production costs down on game titles that are rejected by the community. In this model, the Xbox Live gamer co

    1. Re:Xbox 360 is a monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is hilarious to watch the MS marketing droids desperately doing damager control across the Net.

      Good luck losers! The console world is laughing their asses off at the xbox 360 disaster.

    2. Re:Xbox 360 is a monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see only PS3/Nintendo/Anti-Microsoft fanboys laughing. Just as, when the PS3 launches, only Xbox and Nintendo fanboys will be laughing.

      All non-fanboys are just standing by the sidelines, watching, and waiting to see which to purchase.

  185. Emulation isn't trivial by LionMage · · Score: 1
    three 3.2GHz PPC chips aren't that much more than a 800MHz PIII??

    The problem is that emulation is not something that can easily exploit parallelism. So while we have three 3.2 GHz PowerPC chips in Xbox 360, each of which supports some form of hardware multithreading (each chip supposedly capable of supporting two simultaneous threads in hardware, according to what I've read elsewhere -- I'm guessing it's probably some sort of HyperThreading implementation, and not true dual-core capability), emulating the 800 MHz P3 of the original Xbox might only be able to leverage a single CPU in the Xbox 360.

    To boil this down to a snappy quote: You can't take nine women and make them have a single baby in one month.

    The problem is worse than this, though. The original Xbox used an nVidia video solution; the Xbox 360 uses an ATI solution. While it's true that game developers wrote to Microsoft's API when developing games for the Xbox, it's also true that many of these developers tweaked the shader programs in their 3D games to specifically optimize them for the nVidia hardware. Translating shader programs from one rendering architecture to another is non-trivial, and to do so on-the-fly is a daunting task. I suppose one of the PowerPC chips in the Xbox 360 could be tasked with translating shader programs, leaving another PowerPC to emulate the x86 instruction set and intelligently code-translate the original games. API calls should map directly, more or less, with some data massaging (e.g., big vs. little endian issues).

    Maybe the ATI chip was designed with a compatibility mode to run original Xbox shader programs? Doubtful, as nVidia owns a lot of the intellectual property embedded in their chips and drivers.

    Even if you ignore the fact that emulation usually can't exploit parallelism, you do have one final fact to deal with: Emulation works best when the chip doing the emulation is at least an order of magnitude faster than the chip that is being emulated. A single 3.2 GHz PowerPC processor is maybe a factor of 3 or 4 faster than an 800 MHz Pentium 3, not a factor of 10 or more. And multiprocessing doesn't give you an automatic multiplier -- two CPUs in parallel are not twice as fast as a single CPU, because of memory bandwidth limits and synchronization overhead.
  186. Not A Slam Dunk At All by rutabagaman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I watched the MTV special, but besides the fact that it had wireless controllers I didn't learn much. It's going to have Madden? Project Gotham Racing? A FPS? You don't say?

    Most importantly, I didn't really hear any killer features or see any killer games. They were trying to make HD their killer feature, but it seems a little high end(of course, broadband was pretty high end a few years ago). Customization via micropayments? If it costs money, I don't think gamers will do it(and it still won't make the games any better).

    What I really wanted to know was:

    - is it backward compatible? My guess is it isn't considering they never mentioned it during the broadcast
    - how much is it going to cost?

    I own an Xbox and a PS2 right now, and I didn't see anything I'd want to give up those systems for. My gut says Microsoft might have a real problem on its hands if people decide the current generation is "good enough" and/or want to wait for Sony to respond with their feature set.

    --
    (insert witty/esoteric/dumb quote here)
  187. Unwarranted Assumption by LionMage · · Score: 1
    I think 3 dual-core 3.2GHz processors are going to be pretty expensive.

    I don't think these are dual-core processors. More likely is that they are similar to Intel's HyperThreaded P4 designs. The IGN specs published today seem to back this up; they talk about three CPU cores with two hardware threads per core. "Two hardware threads" is not the same as dual cores.
  188. Mod parent up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the parent comment needs to be modded up.

  189. Re:Guess what a friend of mine just got in the mai by Baggio · · Score: 1

    Because of the DVD? ... Oh, you mean the player I guess?!?

    --
    Time flies like an arrow;
    Fruit flies like a bananna
  190. USB2 port + USB2 tuner + USB2 HDD = PVR by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    Simple. Look for the PVR add-on at additional cost.

    And if they don't, you can bet the moddded XBMC360 will include USB2 PVR support.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  191. Hot Spots... by stephenisu · · Score: 1

    While liquid in a confined area cannot drop overall heat at much of a faster rate, it CAN help with the issue of hotspotting. With three main cores, portions of this chip are going to be hotter than others. Fluid moving about inside the main sink will help even the heat out. You don't even need an external pump, capilary action would work.

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  192. X-box 360 by uberfunk9373 · · Score: 1

    Probably the best review, and site with pictures would be at tomshardware, http://www.tomshardware.com/game/200505121/index.h tml some of the features of the new xbox are amazing, as well as insights as of the origins of the new x-box. Apparantly the old xbox was just marketing to get this thing on the market. The most imressive thing about the new xbox though isn't its cool design, but the fact that it was designed entirely for the ease of the user. At its unveiling (at which reporters from tomshardware were present) representitives plugged in a RIO mp3 player and played streaming music, then also plugged in a PSP, yes a competitors product and it worked over the xbox. Also it runs series of custom Power PC processors. A total of six separate threads are in the base unit, providing for 6 seperate applications to be running at once (like enemy AI, friendly AI, music, etc.) These are just some of its great features, and there are many more. (btw if you haven't guessed yet I am a huge xbox fan)

  193. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  194. Not harder, easier! It's is the point of "XNA" by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1
    If you havn't heard all of Microsoft's blah blah blah over "XNA", I will see if I can recall basic points:
    • The Xbox 360 uses the XNA architecture, which is like Direct X but taken further
    • Longhorn, and perhaps XP at this rate, will both have XNA
    • Games created for the Xbox 360, using XNA, will be far easier to port to the PC because the high level programming won't need to change much, if at all. Only Microsoft's part, the OS's XNA code, will need a lot of changes
    • The Xbox 360 controllers will even be compatible with Windows
    • And there has been talk of Longhorn running games, as consoles do, without installation


    This strategy really helps Microsoft. Game developers like EA who make PC games and console games could more easily/cheaply port from one to another, giving them more incentive to support Microsoft versus, say, Sony. And since most PC games are made for Windows (evil monopoly, etc.), this is even more interesting a plan.
  195. Parent - Correct by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    Parent is right. They said Fable was "live aware", but all it does is keeps the friends list active while you're playing. Otherwise it's completely single player.

  196. 1 Teraflop o' power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when the talk was all about the PS3 being the greatest thing ever because of its 1 teraflop (if it had enough cell chips, or something)? Microsoft is citing this to be the speed of the Xbox 360.

    The PS3 is not, at this rate, going to "widely overpower" the Xbox 360. It'll likely still "widely outsell" it, as the less powerful PS2 did to the Xbox, but a big fanboy arguement is sort of dieing.

  197. Re:Massive processor, not much for graphics though by barawn · · Score: 1

    Not much of a GPU? it has 10MB of EDRAM, and it has 256GB/sec of bandwidth in to it! That's ALOT of bandwidth. No, it's fucking HUGE amount of bandwidth!

    It's a huge amount of bandwidth, but it's just 10MB. It's a texture cache, that's all. Especially with them hoping to push its HD capabilities, 10MB is actually a fairly small cache. It'll need to dig into the main memory quite often.

    The bandwidth of something to its cache isn't exactly all that impressive. Of course it has to be that high - the damn graphics core is running at 500 MHz.

    And in addition, it has the regural GDDR3 at it's disposal as well.

    Shared with the processors.

    6 front ends. Plus 1 graphics card.

    Yup. That's seven users splitting that pipe to the GDDR3. Which is not low latency memory. Which means a huge amount of bandwidth will be lost if all 6 threads are doing anything significant.

    This isn't as impressive as it looks. It's about as impressive as any new console looks at its release.

    Well, several months before its release, at least.