Math is a useful tool for science, but in itself, is not a science. Science is an empirical, starting with observations, making hypotheses, and then formulating theories about the underlying principles. With math, you're given the underlying principles in the form of axioms, and theorems are built up from there using deductive logic.
I agree with you. I was just pointing out that there are people such as Moore who scrutinize corporate actions, and yet are not part of the government or the the traditional good-old-boy network.
You also seem to have forgotten that the Government/Good-Ole-Boys network owns all the (metaphorical) microscopes.
Michael Moore would probably disagree with you on that one.
Slashdot Mirror
Math is a useful tool for science, but in itself, is not a science. Science is an empirical, starting with observations, making hypotheses, and then formulating theories about the underlying principles. With math, you're given the underlying principles in the form of axioms, and theorems are built up from there using deductive logic.
I agree with you. I was just pointing out that there are people such as Moore who scrutinize corporate actions, and yet are not part of the government or the the traditional good-old-boy network.
You also seem to have forgotten that the Government/Good-Ole-Boys network owns all the (metaphorical) microscopes. Michael Moore would probably disagree with you on that one.
That's one interpretation of The Bible, which is most certainly not held by everyone who believes the Bible to be the Word of God.