Cross-border agreements of public services are normal throghout the EU, Schengen area, etc.. It's quite easy to find joint police patrols where there's one officer from each side of the border. That's just what sensible neighbouring jurisdictions do.
How quicklypeopleforget... (you might also look sometimes at your findings from the point of view of perception bias, perhaps also fundamental attribution error (after all it might be also on the level of "we, the People vs. "them, the Govs"...), etc.)
If there's some clumsy PR, it seems to be in other part of TFS. WMAP has not,"quite literally, changed our view of the Universe" - it further refined it nicely, continuing in the footsteps (if mentioning only large space experiments) of COBE and RELIKT-1 (the latter might be one sad example of another type of clumsy PR - apparently already gave us large part of the results for which COBE is praised, but...)
If only CMB was actually strictly about things "in the bowl" / providing data beautifully supportive of some ideas about the early state of "the bowl"... we can dream, huh?
...and so the joint Canadian-Mexican-German-Portugese-Norwegian-Swedish-Venezulean plot can continue unnoticed.
(Portugal still remembers its empire, Canada to finish what was started in 1812, Mexico about general setback in XIX century, Germany - XX century; Norway, Sweden and Venezuela for obvious reasons)
But part does go higher, to the EU budget. Also - proportionally more from the countries which are doing better, and when assigning funds - proportionally more to the countries that are doing worse (also for public infrastructure) - crazy idea, I know.
And since national borders quite often go through some city, or even down the middle of some street, public services from both sides don't limit themselves particularly rigorously to how the border goes, when responding (heck, even mixed police patrols composed of one officer from each country)
Oh, you really don't know how they fit? Just dehumanize some groups, problem solved. Easy, almost natural to our minds. You were on a good track in the above post with regards to parent poster.
Yeah, because obviously "down with the gov!" stalinist libertanians (that's the most apt description...) think about all kinds of them...
Look, in case you don't realise - organized systems of governance are an integral part of any pleasant society with even moderate population density (what would you like to see done with the excess of people BTW?), they are indeed a direct reflection, one of the facets of any given society. You demand is basically equivalent to "name anything good in societies!" or "what did the Romans ever do to us?" (if not for few decades too late, one could think you're not retarted but just trying to be funny via hiding a reference to Monthy Python...)
Boiling down to population density; and you know, even in the EU there are countries with it 2x lower than the US...and having for example far better communication & cellular infrastructure. Thankfully for them, they didn't have few separate corporate interests pushing disparate solutions.
Even if it "works" it seems to be a significantly different thing - a random promotion of one position "up" within the same organisation isn't similar at all to an outright lottery for arguably one of the most crucial (unless everything would be really handed by backstage clerks anyway) positions in a given country.
Slashdot Mirror
Systems of governance are simplu an integral part of the society, are indeed simply of of its fecets, a reflection of sorts.
Leaving those pics might have been better in many cases...
Probably even more folks don't realize how Finland has two times lower population density than the US; Sweden significantly lower, too.
Cross-border agreements of public services are normal throghout the EU, Schengen area, etc.. It's quite easy to find joint police patrols where there's one officer from each side of the border. That's just what sensible neighbouring jurisdictions do.
Finland has two times lower population density than the US. Sweden also significantly lower.
Both Finland and Sweden have significantly lower population density than the US.
How quickly people forget... (you might also look sometimes at your findings from the point of view of perception bias, perhaps also fundamental attribution error (after all it might be also on the level of "we, the People vs. "them, the Govs"...), etc.)
Yeah, what would the Klingons do without deactivated shooting targets?
If there's some clumsy PR, it seems to be in other part of TFS. WMAP has not ,"quite literally, changed our view of the Universe" - it further refined it nicely, continuing in the footsteps (if mentioning only large space experiments) of COBE and RELIKT-1 (the latter might be one sad example of another type of clumsy PR - apparently already gave us large part of the results for which COBE is praised, but...)
If only CMB was actually strictly about things "in the bowl" / providing data beautifully supportive of some ideas about the early state of "the bowl"... we can dream, huh?
Oh, wait.
It would actually require a lot of delta-v; you need less to get to other stars (time of travel being what limits us in this case)
Solid Snake, is that you?
...and so the joint Canadian-Mexican-German-Portugese-Norwegian-Swedish-Venezulean plot can continue unnoticed.
(Portugal still remembers its empire, Canada to finish what was started in 1812, Mexico about general setback in XIX century, Germany - XX century; Norway, Sweden and Venezuela for obvious reasons)
Ever heard about Suez Canal? (for starters)
That's also probably a matter of scale, actual non-manufactured need, etc.
That's what additional tourist or skiing insurances are partly for?
But part does go higher, to the EU budget. Also - proportionally more from the countries which are doing better, and when assigning funds - proportionally more to the countries that are doing worse (also for public infrastructure) - crazy idea, I know.
And since national borders quite often go through some city, or even down the middle of some street, public services from both sides don't limit themselves particularly rigorously to how the border goes, when responding (heck, even mixed police patrols composed of one officer from each country)
And some of those countries have two times smaller population density than the US.
Oh, you really don't know how they fit? Just dehumanize some groups, problem solved. Easy, almost natural to our minds. You were on a good track in the above post with regards to parent poster.
Yeah, because obviously "down with the gov!" stalinist libertanians (that's the most apt description...) think about all kinds of them...
Look, in case you don't realise - organized systems of governance are an integral part of any pleasant society with even moderate population density (what would you like to see done with the excess of people BTW?), they are indeed a direct reflection, one of the facets of any given society.
You demand is basically equivalent to "name anything good in societies!" or "what did the Romans ever do to us?" (if not for few decades too late, one could think you're not retarted but just trying to be funny via hiding a reference to Monthy Python...)
"Essentially nonexistent" meaning something quite removed from what many people typically criticise in the comfort of decently well-off societies...
Shouldn't you also recall how absolutelly fabulous are places with essentially nonexistant systems of governance?
Boiling down to population density; and you know, even in the EU there are countries with it 2x lower than the US...and having for example far better communication & cellular infrastructure. Thankfully for them, they didn't have few separate corporate interests pushing disparate solutions.
Even if it "works" it seems to be a significantly different thing - a random promotion of one position "up" within the same organisation isn't similar at all to an outright lottery for arguably one of the most crucial (unless everything would be really handed by backstage clerks anyway) positions in a given country.
Hm, considering how now there's basically just enough left merely for public debt management...