Almost the other way around?... If objects stay in ~one orbit (also) due to gravitational interaction between them, all except the dominating one don't count as planets.
No reason to bring in stability, really. The orbit of Pluto - in an orbital resonance with Neptune, totally dominated by it (kinda similar deal with Lagrange points) - is quite stable...
Most importantly, the definition in question is only about the planets of Solar System. Somehow a lot of people manage to ignore it... (as well as how it is not set in stone; BTW, Ceres and Vesta were also "planets" for quite a time, and now hardly anybody remembers that... heck, Sun was, too)
Also, those two extrasolar planets might very well be in a very strong gravitational interaction...
They store (and display) how a site looks now - one more bit of data on the quest to Google AI;p (and you know, having an honest-to-FSM AI, to judge websites, even makes sense for Google...)
Maybe quite the contrary. Not only early word processors (at least early DTP or CAD/CAM systems were certainly similar) can be seen a bit like that (even if "fixed") - most importantly, don't forget how in the early days (8-bit home computers, DOS, also Amiga apps to large extent) it was quite typical for an application to "take over"
Closer to home - also so called "feature phones"? Most / all of the UI always tended to disappear after loading some j2me app.
Well, the new ("digital") Soyuz apparently requires only "one and a half" crew members for operation - one full time, one with fairly limited role and relatively basic training. I imagine the latter could be done on the ISS... especially considering the background & experience of ~half of Shuttle crew.
(I'm not saying leaving the Shuttle like that isn't stupid; just throwing in a small factoid)
Maps are a special case - they are basically fixed (yes, they do change; nowhere often enough for that to matter in interaction), each and every one instance essentially the same; mapping to our movements, to environment. I can see how building general UI as ZUI will make hunting positions in menus and option dialogs look good.
If something similar could be made "aware" of your total online history
Google Web History (and in the fullest extent, with a plugin / extension logging more or less every URL) - good after all? (not now of course - but the mentioned future rudimentary AI will need data...)
Even better when basically the same actions give vastly different results, depending on some non-obvious factors (regarding recycle bin - it's really fun when people realize it doesn't work on something as basic as pendrives)
Not only "non-monopoly" operating systems don't exactly seamlessly offer such experience - most importantly, if you look at users, they tend to struggle with as-basic=as-it-gets file management. That might be the reason why nobody is in a hurry to build FS around some wild new paradigms, to somehow convey them via main UI.
Upcoming end of April would be costly... (and I'm not sure if it will somehow dignify or totally destroy my birthday, which are close enough to 29IV to be possibly observed on that day, out of convenience)
...while ignoring even more the "price" part, for such Motorola handset...
And it's actually even worse, in the case of Motorola - you might not see it, but they pretty much retreated out of most markets in 2010, concentrating on the US one (with "premium" people willing to pay "premium" prices / be tied to contracts - while most of the world owns their phones and is on prepaid); in Europe it's only UK, France, Germany, Spain to some extent I believe; some places in Latin America and China (where their handsets come from anyway). Just to approach financial viability. With announcements that low-end and middle-priced handsets won't be getting OS updates.
Almost the other way around?... If objects stay in ~one orbit (also) due to gravitational interaction between them, all except the dominating one don't count as planets.
No reason to bring in stability, really. The orbit of Pluto - in an orbital resonance with Neptune, totally dominated by it (kinda similar deal with Lagrange points) - is quite stable...
Most importantly, the definition in question is only about the planets of Solar System. Somehow a lot of people manage to ignore it... (as well as how it is not set in stone; BTW, Ceres and Vesta were also "planets" for quite a time, and now hardly anybody remembers that... heck, Sun was, too)
Also, those two extrasolar planets might very well be in a very strong gravitational interaction...
It would be useless pretty much instantly... most of its mass and drag-creating structure is determined byt airplane-like reentry.
They store (and display) how a site looks now - one more bit of data on the quest to Google AI ;p (and you know, having an honest-to-FSM AI, to judge websites, even makes sense for Google...)
Oh, but you forget that perceived lies about a BJ are so, so much more horrible than lies pushing a war to avenge daddy...
Eyeballs can be used on both sides; the SEO one certainly can easily find lots of very inexpensive ones.
Maybe quite the contrary. Not only early word processors (at least early DTP or CAD/CAM systems were certainly similar) can be seen a bit like that (even if "fixed") - most importantly, don't forget how in the early days (8-bit home computers, DOS, also Amiga apps to large extent) it was quite typical for an application to "take over"
Closer to home - also so called "feature phones"? Most / all of the UI always tended to disappear after loading some j2me app.
Well, the new ("digital") Soyuz apparently requires only "one and a half" crew members for operation - one full time, one with fairly limited role and relatively basic training. I imagine the latter could be done on the ISS... especially considering the background & experience of ~half of Shuttle crew.
(I'm not saying leaving the Shuttle like that isn't stupid; just throwing in a small factoid)
In two three person Soyuz OTOH...
The Shuttle is mostly an airframe, by mass / volume (mass which needs to be reboosted and surface which creates drag).
I'll repeat that - the Shuttle is mostly an airframe.
"new idea"?...
Maps are a special case - they are basically fixed (yes, they do change; nowhere often enough for that to matter in interaction), each and every one instance essentially the same; mapping to our movements, to environment. I can see how building general UI as ZUI will make hunting positions in menus and option dialogs look good.
If something similar could be made "aware" of your total online history
Google Web History (and in the fullest extent, with a plugin / extension logging more or less every URL) - good after all? (not now of course - but the mentioned future rudimentary AI will need data...)
There are bubbles... and they do stuff... in the cloud?!
In the fog (call it what it is)
Sarcasm?
Even better when basically the same actions give vastly different results, depending on some non-obvious factors (regarding recycle bin - it's really fun when people realize it doesn't work on something as basic as pendrives)
Very apt, considering the effort would very quickly be not worth the gain... (like in somebody jumping on top of real trash)
Not only "non-monopoly" operating systems don't exactly seamlessly offer such experience - most importantly, if you look at users, they tend to struggle with as-basic=as-it-gets file management. That might be the reason why nobody is in a hurry to build FS around some wild new paradigms, to somehow convey them via main UI.
It gets really fun when one of them accidentally hits Num Lock...
Ego of heads of any department is measured largely by the level of spending they can push, when obtaining toys for their department.
Who needs a phone that is three or more years out of date?
"Most of 5+ billion mobile subscribers"? At least that would be my guess. In characteristics that matter to those people, one can see the phones in question as "ahead"...
Partnership or... takeover? (plus those MS stocks of Elop)
Upcoming end of April would be costly... (and I'm not sure if it will somehow dignify or totally destroy my birthday, which are close enough to 29IV to be possibly observed on that day, out of convenience)
...while ignoring even more the "price" part, for such Motorola handset...
And it's actually even worse, in the case of Motorola - you might not see it, but they pretty much retreated out of most markets in 2010, concentrating on the US one (with "premium" people willing to pay "premium" prices / be tied to contracts - while most of the world owns their phones and is on prepaid); in Europe it's only UK, France, Germany, Spain to some extent I believe; some places in Latin America and China (where their handsets come from anyway). Just to approach financial viability. With announcements that low-end and middle-priced handsets won't be getting OS updates.