Slashdot Mirror


Italian Police Seize Blog Over 'Kill Berlusconi' Satire

Giorgio Maone writes "Italian Police just seized the Savona e Ponente Blog because the 60-year-old journalist Valeria Rossi posted a satirical article titled 'I want to kill Berlusconi,' writing that 'you can't feel guilty of wishing him death, because he's not human: he's an alien, with incredible psychic powers.' Otherwise, how could such a clown, with multiple pending trials for corruption, tax offenses, abuse of power and even child prostitution, convince the majority of the other politicians and a consistent slice of Italian people to keep him as their prime minister for almost 20 years now? Here's a mirror of the incriminating text (Italian)." And here's a translation to English.

214 comments

  1. Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did you know it is illegal to say: "I wish President Obama was killed by mortar fire on the White House. It could be set up across the park and use the flag on said White House to provide a rough wind measurement."

    1. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know it is illegal to say: "I wish President Obama was killed by mortar fire on the White House. It could be set up across the park and use the flag on said White House to provide a rough wind measurement."

      You know, that's actually a pretty good idea! The flag being used to gauge wind speed I mean, not the killing part... I never would have thought of that.

    2. Re:Is the US any better? by ls671 · · Score: 2

      Anybody with some type of aviation or military experience would have although ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re:Is the US any better? by durrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your comment will lead to some militrary contractor getting the opportunity to sell gigantic fans for $500 million each to the white house. within two weeks you'll notice that the flags around the white house will always point in a offset from the actual wind direction.

    4. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have posted anonymously there bud.. Here come the pain!

    5. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Obama chokes on his own vomit after downing a few too many bottles of Colt 45.

    6. Re:Is the US any better? by h00manist · · Score: 1

      Should have posted anonymously there bud.. Here come the pain!

      Checked out. Nerdy kid with some rebellious ideas, enjoys attention, no intention to carry out any of it. No threatening links to weapons, training, or connections who do. No action required.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    7. Re:Is the US any better? by gilleain · · Score: 1

      Your comment will lead to some militrary contractor getting the opportunity to sell gigantic fans for $500 million each to the white house. within two weeks you'll notice that the flags around the white house will always point in a offset from the actual wind direction.

      Hmmm. Perhaps a mechanical flag would be better, with thin metal supports in the cloth controlled by a mechanism running down to pole. That way, a central controller could track the wind and wave a little 'off'. Or perhaps some 3D hologram system (giant octagonal bodies and highway ramps for arms!)...

    8. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its terroristic threatening to detail a murder attempt on ANYONE. Not just the president. Saying "I want to kill the president" is however perfectly legal because you don't detail how you're going to do it and its assumed that you aren't serious about the threat.

    9. Re:Is the US any better? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps we build this large, wooden Badger...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    10. Re:Is the US any better? by donotlizard · · Score: 2

      Or have no flags at all. Everyone knows the White House is in the United States. Why the need to advertise?

    11. Re:Is the US any better? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Because then the terrorists will have won.

    12. Re:Is the US any better? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never been to America.

    13. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works every time.

    14. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because Americans have a raging hard-on for their flag.

    15. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      [Citation needed]

    16. Re:Is the US any better? by shentino · · Score: 0

      "Killed by mortar fire on the white house using the flag as a wind guide" is a lot more serious and credible than calling the prime minister a coercively telepathic extraterrestrial.

      I would be quite alarmed if your example did *not* get taken seriously. Whether or not our president is worth our respect, he has a very important job and things would be worse if that particular post was abandoned and unmanned.

    17. Re:Is the US any better? by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Did you know it is illegal to say: "I wish President Obama was killed by mortar fire on the White House. It could be set up across the park and use the flag on said White House to provide a rough wind measurement.""

      BZZT! Wrong! I've had several talks with the SS, in person, regarding a phone call I had with someone stating similar things.

      It is not illegal until you say "I plan to" or "I am going to."

      Saying "I wish" is an opinion and is protected speech.

      The whole thing revolves around INTENT. Wishing is not the same as saying you'll do it.

      This has been a PSA from someone that has dealt with the Secret Service on multiple occasions - in fact some of my own ./ postings have made the SS come to my house.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    18. Re:Is the US any better? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It has everything to do with context. For example you could state "I wish ex-President Bush was killed, executed by firing squad, after being found guilty in a court of law for murder by starting an illegal war in which innocent people died". In a country that allowed capital punishment that would be quite legal, of course those legal clarifications are required to create the correct context.

      In the case of the blog, satire as an excuse does not protect you from everything you might decide to write. In this case the blogger did go a little over the top. So investigation hardly surprising. Seizing the blog a bit of a failure as it was bound to generate far greater interest making things worse. Smarter to have requested some artful editing or threaten the writer with reasonable risk of prosecution.

      Note. I oppose capital punishment, you do not prevent murder by murdering people, the wrong message is sent ie. that premeditated psychological torture and murder is justifiable. Better that the offender spend the rest of the life as a testament to justice and just in case justice failed (as it often does) be in a condition to be compensated and released.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:Is the US any better? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      More likely one of these, M61 "Counter-Rocket" gatling gun-on-a-truck shoots down mortars like skeet; why use fans when there are systems that spit out 4500-7000 round a minute pretty much without human intervention! Cool video on the link too.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    20. Re:Is the US any better? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Besides if Obama was killed then Biden would become President, which is probably why some whacko hasn't tried so far.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    21. Re:Is the US any better? by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

      I thought for sure this was a WKUK reference, but then none of the replies seem to acknowledge that... maybe I was wrong?

      --
      Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
      no hidden comments and I only mod UP
    22. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They inherited the concept from the British, who built an empire through the cunning use of flags.

    23. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't that right, Vice President Santiago?

      Siiiiiii!

    24. Re:Is the US any better? by Oloryn · · Score: 1

      and a wooden snake?

    25. Re:Is the US any better? by qeveren · · Score: 1

      No, no it isn't. It's 'uttering threats'. Just because you don't like something, or because something is illegal, doesn't make it 'terroristic'. Whatever that is.

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    26. Re:Is the US any better? by Ventriloquate · · Score: 1

      Or just use a non-moving flag for like 1/10000000th of the cost.

    27. Re:Is the US any better? by no+known+priors · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I plan to kill President Obama by mortar fire on the White House. It could be set up across the park and use the flag on said White House to provide a rough wind measurement.

      I'm going to kill President Obama, perhaps by mortar fire on his car as he drives it around.

      I'm going to blow up the president! I'm going to kill the President of the United State's Wife, Daughter and Little Dog Toto! (Or whatever the dog's name is.)

      I'm going to kill all these scum (including the entire congress when I get the chance, the various governors of the various states, and various other authority figures in the USA) by stabbing them with a blunt fork!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. The maximum is 120 characters.
    28. Re:Is the US any better? by ooshna · · Score: 1

      and a wooden mushroom mushroom...

    29. Re:Is the US any better? by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Perhaps a mechanical flag would be better, with thin metal supports in the cloth controlled by a mechanism running down to pole. That way, a central controller could track the wind and wave a little 'off'..

      You mean like the one they used when they faked the moon landings?

    30. Re:Is the US any better? by greyblack · · Score: 2

      I've had several talks with the SS, in person...

      The SS is still around, and operating on behalf of the US gov?

      hmm. guess that explains a lot of things going on lately.

      Wait..Secret Service. Jawohl indeed.

      --
      Everybody uses broad generalizations.
    31. Re:Is the US any better? by JockTroll · · Score: 1

      "Checked out. Nerdy kid with some rebellious ideas, enjoys attention, no intention to carry out any of it. No threatening links to weapons, training, or connections who do. No action required." Possibly homosexual. Must remember to investigate further.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    32. Re:Is the US any better? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Yup, they can just use one of the backup moon flags from the Apollo program.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    33. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But this happened in Italy. Here it is a civil offense to the person (you can get sued and have to pay damages to the person) to wish someone dead.

      If such an offense is against a public official(policeman, for example) or elected person, or part of the state(like the president of the council(wrongly called prime minister...there is no real prime minister in Italy)) it is a penal offense.

      I'm just stating a fact. i don't like Berlusconi either, but going against laws to attack him is not helping in removing him from power. In fact such things help him a lot.

      The journalist was quite naive in writing such a thing.

    34. Re:Is the US any better? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Your user name makes this so much more amusing.

      Enjoy the SS visit. I'm pretty sure THAT is exactly the statement that will have them at your door! Good day, sir!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    35. Re:Is the US any better? by chrb · · Score: 2

      It is not illegal until you say "I plan to" or "I am going to."

      Not true. Speech is not protected if a court finds that it incites violence:

      The more than 12 defendants in the case were ordered to pay $100 million in damages to abortion clinics and doctors. They had argued that they have a free speech right to publish details about the doctors, but after a three-week trial, an eight-person jury found that such sites were a "true threat" to physicians who perform abortions, according to the Planned Parenthood Columbia/Willamette (PPCW) in Portland.

      Note that the Christian web site in question never said that they planned to or were going to carry out acts of violence - it merely collated information about what they termed "baby butchers" and called for them to be "brought to justice".

    36. Re:Is the US any better? by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      Enjoy the SS visit.

      How do you know that no known priors even lives in the US? Maybe he is posting that from the safety of Europe, and never intends to travel to the US? And moreover, Slashdot respects its users' privacy, and will never hand over details to the SS. The only entity that they ever hand details over to are the clams

      Yes, that's right: you get into more trouble saying that a galactic despot named Xenu decided 75 million years ago to kill a bunch of people by chaining them to volcanoes and dropping nuclear bombs on them, than saying that you will kill Obama using some poisoned feijoada during his visit to Brazil in March.

    37. Re:Is the US any better? by no+known+priors · · Score: 1

      You are correct in two things, one that I'm not in the USA, and two that I never intend to travel to the USA (well, at least while such absurdities as a person getting into legal trouble for posting obviously insincere threats against the very public figure of the president). However, you are incorrect (as far as I know) in that the individual responsible for posting the copyrighted material did not get into trouble for doing so. Indeed, as far as I know, they have never been identified publicly.

      Oh, and I will kill Obama using some poisoned feijoada (whatever that is) during his visit to Brazil in March.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. The maximum is 120 characters.
    38. Re:Is the US any better? by bball99 · · Score: 1

      you know, i just can't find the stuff around here even though PBR is in the grocery store...

      could someone send me some?

    39. Re:Is the US any better? by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are hundreds of flags that are flown up there and on the roof of the US Congress. You wouldn't believe the amount of business that is done selling flags that have been flown up there. Even I got one as a present.

    40. Re:Is the US any better? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Schutzstaffel?

    41. Re:Is the US any better? by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      The simplest answer is because projectiles fall back down to earth. That means there will be impact with some poor schmuck's home over in Georgetown.

      The other answer is that the White House is already pretty much a bunker with the president's offices well protected, and there are a classified number of guns, radar and so on on already up there.

    42. Re:Is the US any better? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I thought Clark was VP and Santiago was Prez...

    43. Re:Is the US any better? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      one that I'm not in the USA, and two that I never intend to travel to the USA

      Then you don't have any point to make at all.

      You can equally threaten to kill Berlusconi and the Italian police won't do anything.

      Of course the US does have a confirmed history of abducting foreigners in foriegn countries, though the SS doesn't seem to do that.

      well, at least while such absurdities as a person getting into legal trouble for posting obviously insincere threats against the very public figure of the president

      How is that an absurdity? Sure the Italian situation is likely different since there's a history of Berlusconi being about as close as you can be to an above the law dictator while actually still being democratically elected.

      But if you make a threat, even in jest, on the President the SS is obviously going to investigate it if they find out about it. Say your work for the SS, would you rather spend a few hours visiting the person and getting them to explain they were joking (using all the normal interview techniques) and file the report saying "idiot kid making a joke, has long conservation about seriousness" or do nothing and have it turn out that that guy does in fact kill the President six months later. That second option is very "career limiting", that first one is really not much effort on your part and gets you away from the desk for a little bit - and the fact that there's now a file on the guy makes no difference to you.

      Would you really rather the police of every stripe just decided without doing any investigation at all that "that's obviously not serious, just ignore it" about every crime?

      America has a long history of Presidents being assassinated. 6 of the 8 Presidents during my lifetime have been subject to assassination attempts (from having a live grenade thown next to them, to being shot at, to being shot, to a guy planning to crash a jumbo into the white house actually hikacking the plane), 1 of the 2 remaining has been subject to threats considered serious. Hence they aren't going to just ignore something because it looks like it might be a joke.

    44. Re:Is the US any better? by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      If they don't put up flag on US soil, the only US flags anyone would see, would be on fire. The US needs some PR.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    45. Re:Is the US any better? by Krneki · · Score: 1

      In the EU hate speech is forbidden, so you have a better chance to pull this stunt in the US.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    46. Re:Is the US any better? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      There are "counter-rocket" systems much smaller than that too. There are units they mount on APCs that are under 3ft tall and 3ft long.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    47. Re:Is the US any better? by cain · · Score: 2

      ...in fact some of my own ./ postings have made the SS come to my house.

      I don't believe this. How did they get your address from your user ID or email address? Pics or it didn't happen.

    48. Re:Is the US any better? by SaroDarksbane · · Score: 0

      Checked out. Nerdy kid with some rebellious ideas, enjoys attention, no intention to carry out any of it. No threatening links to weapons, training, or connections who do. A SWAT team with an itchy trigger finger will arrive to kick down his door in 5.

      FTFY

    49. Re:Is the US any better? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "Of course the US does have a confirmed history of abducting foreigners in foriegn countries, though the SS doesn't seem to do that."

      The job of the SS is A. Protect the United States Currency and B. Investigate threats against teh President of the United States.

      The SS *WILL* fly overseas to find you. I've asked a couple of times during my own SS visits, yes, they do travel internationally.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    50. Re:Is the US any better? by no+known+priors · · Score: 1

      Being an anarchist, I actually would be perfectly happy to have all figures in positions of power (political, economic and military) taken out. I'm not sure it would change much fundamentally, but damn it would be satisfying. English speaking Conservatives I've spoken to (especially, but not only, from the USA) seemed quite happy to invade Iraq to merely remove a dictator, even if all the other reasons were known to be bullshit. I take that desire to the logical conclusion, and wish to remove all unreasonable fetters on human freedom (the only reasonable fetters being restrictions on restricting other's freedom). The fact that capitalism and the state are huge features on human freedom, means that the people in charge are directly responsible for keeping me less free than what could otherwise be the case. So if they were all killed off, it would be satisfying, even if the level of freedom didn't actually increase as a result.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. The maximum is 120 characters.
    51. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secret service can compel Slashdot, your ISP, and whomever else for your information without so much as a warrant under anti-terrorism law. Why don't you believe they could find your name/address from a Slashdot post (assuming no proxy/wireless/etc)?

    52. Re:Is the US any better? by cain · · Score: 1

      And how is your real name and address associated with a slashdot user id? If the information is not there, no amount of gov't thuggery can magically make it appear.

    53. Re:Is the US any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is your real name and address associated with a slashdot user id?

      Slashdot (possibly) logs IP address that was used to post a comment. Whois tells them the ISP. The ISP's (thanks to data retention laws) logs tells them what account has that IP address assigned (or had at the time). The accounting dept. of the ISP maps the account to your billing name and address. TOS says that regardless of who was actually sitting at the keyboard, you are responsible.

      So much for theory. However I doubt that US agents will fly over to talk to me. Even if they did - what power do they have here and why should I talk to them? Or are they going to act illegally in foreign country? I guess that they need a better reason for that then a post on slashdot.

    54. Re:Is the US any better? by cain · · Score: 1

      Slashdot (possibly) logs IP address that was used to post a comment.

      They do not. Therefore OP is lying about visits from the secret service.

  2. Gotta Be Careful by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

    Not everybody has the same sense of humor ... especially politicians and those who's job it is to protect them.

    1. Re:Gotta Be Careful by ls671 · · Score: 1

      The guy has been lucky so far, wait until the mob gets at him ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Gotta Be Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everybody has the same sense of humor ... especially politicians and those who's job it is to protect them.

      Yes it's weird. This journalist is a woman. Women are completely immune to prosecution for sexual harassment, rape, domestic abuse, and indecent exposure even when it is absolutely certain they have done those things, and fellas, women physically hit/abuse their spouses more than men do -- think about that. I thought they would throw "threatening language" in there as a bonus immunity but I guess I was wrong. Maybe Italy isn't all about the double standards like USA.

    3. Re:Gotta Be Careful by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Not likely, as it's already pretty well established he has connections to the mob (as in the mafia...)

    4. Re:Gotta Be Careful by ls671 · · Score: 1

      By the guy, I meant the blog owner. I thought it was obvious... ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    5. Re:Gotta Be Careful by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Doh, I assumed Valeria Rossi was a woman, so I didn't make the connection to "the guy". Damn Italians and their men's names ending with a... :)

    6. Re:Gotta Be Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the guy, I meant the blog owner. I thought it was obvious... ;-)

      She is a woman.

    7. Re:Gotta Be Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck did this get moderated insightful?

    8. Re:Gotta Be Careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because we don't educate boys about the proper response to being hit by a woman:

      FALCON PUNCH.

  3. Alternative? by Threni · · Score: 2

    I keep reading about this clown, the demonstrations against him etc, but it all seems to boil down to one thing - the lack of a credible alternative. As long as there isn't one, he's going to be in power. This simple fact seems to have escaped the Italian voting public for years now. Is it really hard to find someone in Italy who's not a crook and who wants to be president?

    1. Re:Alternative? by Aldenissin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Would YOU want to run against him? If you were to, remember, if something happened to you he'd automatically win...

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    2. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like here in the US.

    3. Re:Alternative? by skids · · Score: 1, Redundant

      It all boils down to "laws and morality are for little people." If there's a lack of a credible alternative, it's probably because the credible alternatives, being a little guys, get discredited through illegal (but not to the PTB) acts the inute they come on the radar.

    4. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there are alternatives. What about the former PM, Romani Prodi?

    5. Re:Alternative? by black6host · · Score: 1

      "it's probably because the credible alternatives, being a little guys, get discredited through illegal (but not to the PTB) acts the inute they come on the radar."

      Wow, that was about as hard to read as the translation to english linked to in the summary :) No offense meant, j/k.

    6. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the end, they will need to import someone in from the US or Canada for a turn-around -- they've already started with one of their national institutions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergio_Marchionne

      For nationalistic reasons, he (unlikely they'd accept a 'she' yet) will need to have mildly Italian roots.

    7. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I speak for all Canadian. We are willing to hand Tony Tomassi, ex-minister of la famiglia, well know for it corruption in the John James "jean" Charest's cabinet and linked to italian mafia in Montreal.

    8. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can alternatives be credible when the incumbent owns the media?

    9. Re:Alternative? by quippe · · Score: 1

      His spokesman - Silvio Sircana - was found enjoying a party with a transsexual about two years ago.

    10. Re:Alternative? by Caraig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Burlusconi has been Prime Minister of Italy for a long time now, in part by owning most of the media -- he started with a radio station and a newspaper in the south, and pretty much came to control everything. When he wanted the job of PM, guess who every newspaper endorsed for the job? He's basically the William Randolph Hearst of Italy, except Hearst never managed to hold an office.

      Burlusconi is in it only for the power and will stomp on anyone to get his way. In a way, though, this is extremely instructive: This is what happens when you allow one person or a handful of people unrestricted control of the media.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    11. Re:Alternative? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Isn't Italy a parliamentary government? That means it's like the whole government doesn't have a representative who is a better choice for PM than a corupt, seventy year old pedophile. Some Italians actually look up to him because he's still a lecherous bastard at his age.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    12. Re:Alternative? by Odinlake · · Score: 1

      Giv'em Nixon.

      oh wait, he's dead.

    13. Re:Alternative? by boombaard · · Score: 1

      Here's a nice summary of Berlusconi's history.

    14. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prodi is not going to candidate, so he is no alternative in any way. (Prodi is not a good politician anyway)

    15. Re:Alternative? by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      It is easier to parse if you treat "inute" as a mis-spelled "minute"

    16. Re:Alternative? by Sal+Zeta · · Score: 1

      Basically, yes.

      Both from conservative to socialists point of view is near impossible to find someone who isn't A) a crook / mafioso / neo-aryan fanatic or B) completely irrelevant.

      right now there are just two possible viable alternative on both sides of the political spectrum (Gianfranco Fini and Nichi Vendola) ,but nobody is actually supporting them because they are extremely realist on what is needed in Italy to fix things and no one (politician, high class citizen, entrepreneur) really wants to start paying taxes / follow the law / act in a sensate way, actually.

      Meanwhile with Berlusconi is in control they are pretty much safe because their behaviour falls perfectly in line with Berlusconi's one.

    17. Re:Alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got it, and really, no offense was meant. It was more a commentary on how the translation read to me. Not bad for computer generated but there was a lot of stuff you had to think through.... The commented upon post just reminded me of it :)

  4. Well, well by Nuno+Sa · · Score: 1

    The man is no doubt a wizard in the arts of illusion, but what I'm more concerned about is the global Police State we're living in.

  5. What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Could it be some cherished, carefully guarded tradition? I remember few quite similar, in spirit, Roman Emperors... or (ducks) Popes ;p

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On the other hand, Roman emperors also had the habit of occasionally getting things done in grand style. That is what I find most baffling about Berlusconi's endurance: Not only is the guy a grossly corrupt sleazeball plutocrat, he hasn't achieved particularly thrilling results in economic, law-and-order, or quality of life metrics.

      He's like the decadent and incompetent version of Putin.

    2. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He owns the media in Italy.

    3. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      He's like the decadent and incompetent version of Putin.

      This is the best definition of Berlusconi I ever read !

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    4. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by Shemmie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those two are best buddies, if I remember my wikileaks correctly.

      Yeah, thought so WikiLeaks 'to highlight Putin and Berlusconi's special relationship'

      One controls the Italian Mafia, one controls the Russian Mafia.

    5. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote :)

    6. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Controls? It's far more likely that they're controlled by the mob.

    7. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      He's like the decadent and incompetent version of Putin.

      George W. Bush?

    8. Re:What keeps him in power for 2 decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, in incompetance and corruption GWB might seem pretty bad to most people, but he is small potato. He is way out of his league compared to Berlusconi or Putin.

  6. clearly irresponsible blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one of those pieces that can be read with equal plausibility as an incitement to violence or as a joke. The idea of killing the prime minister is mentioned not once, but several times in obsessive fashion. What, you mean you can't write a piece expressing exasperation with Berlusconi and the Italian parliament without making those "jokes"?

  7. Double dumbass on you by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I see this a lot in politics these days: educated, intelligent journalists lashing out and saying anyone who doesn't agree with their political opinions must not be a member of the human race. And here's one who thinks that it's OK to call for deaths just because she's frustrated. America has the same thing, Sarah Palin's calls for violence incited her followers and real people died.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Double dumbass on you by Jahava · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see this a lot in politics these days: educated, intelligent journalists lashing out and saying anyone who doesn't agree with their political opinions must not be a member of the human race. And here's one who thinks that it's OK to call for deaths just because she's frustrated.

      There's a critical difference between a satirical call for death and an actual death threat. Death itself is a powerful subject, and it can be used quite aptly to evoke far more sentiment than straight murderous rampage. In this case, she wasn't stating her intent to kill Berlusconi, nor was she attempting to rally others to do the same. Rather, she was expressing her rage and frustration at him, which is well within (at least American) bounds of free speech.

      This seizure wasn't made out of fear and concern for Berlusconi's wellbeing. This is textbook abuse of law for the purpose of silencing opposition.

      America has the same thing, Sarah Palin's calls for violence incited her followers and real people died.

      This is a really stupid example. Maybe read a little into things before echoing the political impulse. As outrageous and annoying as Palin is, there is no good reason to suspect she had anything to do with the shootings.

    2. Re:Double dumbass on you by nyri · · Score: 1

      I see this a lot in politics these days: educated, intelligent journalists lashing out and saying anyone who doesn't agree with their political opinions must not be a member of the human race.

      You truly are missing the point. This is not about a disagreeing with political opinion. It is lashing out because Mr. Berlusconi is a criminal of the worst degree. He's using his post as a prime minister shield against various corruption charges, he's hiring child prostitutes, he's appointing showgirls as parliamentary candidates, etc. The guy is an embarrassment to whole Europe. Only the people of Italy does not seem to get it.

    3. Re:Double dumbass on you by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Informative

      > saying anyone who doesn't agree with their political opinions must not be a member of the human race

      Lemme translate some famous pearls of S. Berlusconi
      "Judges are mentally ill and antropologically different from the rest of human race"
      About his opposition: "I can't believe there are so many dumbasses ('coglioni') that vote against their interests"

      So, police, go seize his TV stations.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    4. Re:Double dumbass on you by Ben4jammin · · Score: 1

      While I agree there is a BIG difference between satire and actual death threats, I think you also have to be careful when you use language that "dehumanizes". A byproduct of that is you are implicitly stating that they are not worthy of being treated as a human being. Surely the satire will survive without inference.

      And you are right on about the Palin thing...just understand you are probably not being heard. There are people that NEED to believe she was the cause of it, regardless of facts. I wish she would just go away, and I think she often exhibits a poor choice of words. But to imply that Loughner was her follower is simply not supported by the facts known at this time.

    5. Re:Double dumbass on you by marcello_dl · · Score: 2

      They're not "child" prostitutes, they're like seventeen. Now, I agree that it's abhorrent to go with somebody that young if you're over 24 and he's like 70. I also think that if guilty he'd have to go straight to jail as underage prostitution is terrible.
      But I point out that had he waited some months the girls would turn 18, he'd have been above such charges. I have theories:
      1. those girls are the way to frame him, his entourage has a lot of shady guys. The mafia or the really powerful people don't let a guy like berlusconi get too powerful without a way to control him.
      2. 17 is illegal. 18 is legal, no fun anymore. Pedobear sh^t gets real.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    6. Re:Double dumbass on you by CajunArson · · Score: 1

      Sarah Palin's calls for violence incited her followers and real people died.

      Citation REALLY FUCKING NEEDED. (oh and if you are talking about the shooting in Arizona, then Sarah Palin's "follower" was someone who ignored all politics... you may just as blamed Obama since Obama talked about bringing guns to knife fights in Philadelphia when he was campaigning) Just because a politician like Palin is unpopular on Slashdot does not make her a terrorist. What's even worse is that people on this website will twist themselves into moral and logical pretzels to defend real terrorists like Hamas and Hezbollah while condemning any western politician that they disagree with.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    7. Re:Double dumbass on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall another case on Slashdot when a Conservative politician in the UK had used language about the "stoning" of a journalist.

      Somehow there was great support for his punishment and the need to interpret any call for death strictly.

    8. Re:Double dumbass on you by 517714 · · Score: 2

      Legally they are not underage prostitutes.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    9. Re:Double dumbass on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "About his opposition: "I can't believe there are so many dumbasses ('coglioni') that vote against their interests""

      Sounds a lot like exactly what I hear from Democrats just about ten times a day. The difference is that they don't say the word 'coglioni' but every other word is identical. Hence why is this a problem to say?

    10. Re:Double dumbass on you by 0123456 · · Score: 0

      I see this a lot in politics these days: educated, intelligent journalists lashing out and saying anyone who doesn't agree with their political opinions must not be a member of the human race.

      That's because they're lefties. Dehumanisation is the first step towards mass murder, and the left always end up murdering everyone who disagrees with them once they have absolute power.

      Political violence is endemic on the left, which is probably why the Italians took this so seriously.

    11. Re:Double dumbass on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a really stupid example. Maybe read a little into things before echoing the political impulse. As outrageous and annoying as Palin is, there is no good reason to suspect she had anything to do with the shootings.

      Except for the fact that if any one of us non-politicians had an identical looking website as Palin's with gun crosshairs and a listing of people (one of which was just murdered), we would be in prison right now waiting for our trial in 2025 or later.

      Of course she felt her website was unrelated and innocent as well, which is why she didn't take it down that same da... oh wait.

    12. Re:Double dumbass on you by quippe · · Score: 1

      "About his opposition: "I can't believe there are so many dumbasses ('coglioni') that vote against their interests""

      Sounds a lot like exactly what I hear from Democrats just about ten times a day. The difference is that they don't say the word 'coglioni' but every other word is identical. Hence why is this a problem to say?

      That's because the opposition in italy believes the majority of people who voted berlusconi doesn't even exists. Probably that narcissism they (opposition leaders and people following them) have grown in the past 20 years is the main reason we actually have no real alternative to berlusconi right now.

    13. Re:Double dumbass on you by Zancarius · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except for the fact that if any one of us non-politicians had an identical looking website as Palin's with gun crosshairs and a listing of people (one of which was just murdered), we would be in prison right now waiting for our trial in 2025 or later.

      The Dems did a similar thing in 2004. And even then, I think that's a pretty silly example. While we're at it, let's investigate anyone who uses the phrase "targeted marketing."

      The guy who shot Giffords was obsessed with killing her and had been for some time. It had nothing to do with Palin or with target emblems on some random site that very few people probably even looked at--and let's not get into a hypothetical rant.

      I swear, the political Left in the US is just as bad (worse, actually) as the whackjobs they point to repeatedly on the Right.

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    14. Re:Double dumbass on you by MeateaW · · Score: 2

      lolwut? Are you a moron? Right now, we can point at a couple of wars that could be blamed on the right. Before then there were a couple of wars that could be blamed on the left. (arguably smaller than the more recent "right wing wars" - not to mention the reasons behind the wars turned out to be truthful.) And before all that there has been war / murder / death at the behest of all kinds of *extremists*. Lefties can be extremists and righties can be extremists. Political violence is endemic *in the human race*. (and if anything ultra conservative religious nuts are more likely to dehumanise than any other group, I mean, we are all infested with the devil are we not?)

    15. Re:Double dumbass on you by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      consent is different from prostitution, I guess, but IANAL.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  8. Is he eligible to be prime minister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He's not eligible to be prime minister because he was born in Kenya.

    1. Re:Is he eligible to be prime minister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, so Italy elected an African prime minister? ;-)

  9. well.. by EasyTarget · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What keeps him in power so long? You mean apart from owning the press, subverting due process and being beloved by the police?

    The funny thing is that put that way; he sounds just like most of our beloved leaders.

    --
    "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    1. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is that put that way; he sounds just like most of our beloved leaders.

      And he gets more young pussy -- truely a modern hero!

    2. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe the italians just don't care?

      Most of the Western world is filled with a staggering amount of hypocrisy, really a form of insanity, when it comes to politics.

      There is hypocrisy about the importance of the law. As a Norwegian, does it provoke me that the so-called 'Mother of the Labour Party' Gro Harlem Brundtland, later head of the WTO, illegally claimed a pension without getting locked up for it? Do I notice that the Labour Party happens to be the one in power at the moment which may be entirely coincidental?

      There is hypocrisy about creating an imaginary standard you selectively can hold people to, but not care about yourself. If a right-wing politician called his opponent "stupid and uneducated", it would be considered pretty much an application to be banned from all public positions. Yet I see on every discussion board I visit left-wing people call right-wing people 'stupid and uneducated'. There is clearly some madness involved in that gap of perception about what you can do.

      Berlusconi enjoys a party. So what? I am pretty sure most people enjoy a party as well. I recognise that Western World Standard is to require a form of submission by your leaders, that they should lower themselves in your eyes and pretend not to do things like partying (although things like living in a $50m mansion is okay as long as you don't talk about it).

      You would probably agree with the notion (going by the political makeup of Slashdot) that any word about women being well suited for caring roles is a sin as evil as killing the entirety of mankind, and must be eradicated and the sources relegated to correctional re-education facilities immediately so their infectious poison cannot be allowed to destroy society. Maybe many people just look around themselves and say "Hey, this is kind of what I feel based on what I see myself"?

      In other words, the things that Berlusconi do that most left-oriented West Europeans consider grave sins may simply be not that relevant or important in the eyes of his supporters. By implication, the "scandals" as a source of something unproblematic are unproblematic in themselves. You therefore rather have to tally up the important (non-submissive, common standards) aspects of being in government - and on those he may not be sufficiently bad.

    3. Re:well.. by quintesse · · Score: 1

      My personal theory always has been that because of Italy's macho culture most Italian men would love to be in his shoes. So they might admit that he's an awful politician but secretely they wish they had a pair of balls like his. ;)

    4. Re:well.. by worf_mo · · Score: 2

      He is not beloved by the police. Just have a look at the ANSA messages on the sap website (Sindacato Autonomo di Polizia, a union for the members of the Polizia di Stato). These are the official statements - it would be interesting to read the "off the record"-messages.

      The current government has cut funds so that the police doesn't have enough money to fuel their cars. Stories about officers buying gas for the patrol cars with their own, personal money are no exaggeration. I know a couple of officers who have quit service because they say they can't do a proper job any longer, understaffed and without a budget to speak of.

      Today's news let us know that police officers should not use their munitions anymore because the bullets might explode. The government has decided to buy munitions from another country in order to save some money. Unfortunately the gun powder used is too "active".

      What Berlusconi definitely has (apart from owning most of the media) is a number of good lawyers and law experts that happen to also be members of the current government and as such keep creating new laws and bending existing laws so that he can avoid getting thrown into jail. Also, the whole judicial system has been deprived of funds. Processes take longer and longer, and Berlusconi can hope for prescription. Some laws have terrible consequences - like the depenalization of certain crimes that leads to the release of a lot of criminals, just to make sure the current Prime Minister can't be indicted.

  10. Kinda what I was thinking by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda what I was thinking. Especially a text which doesn't have any smiley or anything, and, as far as my piss-poor Italian allows, can read just as well as a schizophrenic's hate tirade. I mean, much as I would like to believe that a text going on about how someone isn't human and can hypnotize the masses is obviously a parody, you could say the same about the contrail conspiracy theory and yet some dolts out there believe it in all earnest.

    The thing is, some people _do_ go nuts now and then and start believing all sorts of highly illogical stuff right before they go and shoot someone. A text whose basic and repeated gist seems to be "I never was for killing another human, but I want to kill the head of the government, and it's ok to kill him because he's a mind-controling alien" would probably get one investigated in the USA or most other countries.

    I kind of have sympathy for him, and see how being run by a douchebag using his media monopoly to keep himself in power would drive someone to despair. But FFS there are better ways to go about it without sounding like a delusional rant about wanting to kill him. Or at least, you know, a couple of winking smileys or something.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Kinda what I was thinking by Sal+Zeta · · Score: 2

      Just because it has no lolcats in it doesn't means it's not satire...it is actually shows a very similar tone and style of another pretty much famous italian female satirist, even if this text is quite mediocre and comes out as a very ugly copy of her.

      Actually it's pretty much clear for a native speaker that she is speaking in very surreal , "Falling Down" kind of way.

      The more probable reason is that right now much of the real political opposition to Berlusconi in italy comes from Intellectuals, journalists and comedians (especially female comedians ) considering that much of the left wing party gave up or just became subordinated to right wing parties trying to get some breadcrumbs from what they're grabbing before leaving the economic wasteland that Italy is going to become in the next few years. If you live in the southern part of italy right now, You wouldn't notice any difference with Colombia or Bolivia.

    2. Re:Kinda what I was thinking by orzetto · · Score: 2

      as far as my piss-poor Italian allows, can read just as well as a schizophrenic's hate tirade.

      I understand your argument, but as a mother-language Italian speaker I can confirm that the text is clearly meant tongue-in-cheek. Not an especially hilarious piece, maybe in bad taste, but it would be obvious even to a moron in a hurry (provided he can read Italian) that it is not serious.

      I am pretty sure that, had such a piece been written about some opponent of Berlusconi (e.g. Di Pietro, Vendola or Fini), no such action would have been taken. This is probably the case of some police officer trying to boost his career by showing he is aligned with the government.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    3. Re:Kinda what I was thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Especially a text which doesn't have any smiley or anything,

      WTF! I hope you are joking. I mean, why in hell would we need smileys to show that something is humour? Do you prefer canned laughters as well?

      Back in the days when Jonathan Swift suggested to eat infants, he did not use smileys.

  11. Should Italy allow such kind of satire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the violent episodes in recent and not so recent history of italy (for instance brigate rosse) some humor is so tasteless to be borderline criminal. One can be critical of berlusconi without having to resort to that. For a good example one can watch the endless stream of satire against him going on on his own tv channels (yes it happens! that sells a lot of ad so he doesn't not stop it).

  12. Pile on more evidence that Italy is a madhouse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The people who speak the truth are treated like criminals and the criminals are free and run the country. Tunisia, Egypt, Italy?

  13. OK boys by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    Lesson #1: Never, ever, get into anything related to bashing politicians. It's a free way to disaster.
    I'd go as far as to say "Never voice your political opinions", except maybe with your family and close friends.

    1. Re:OK boys by maxume · · Score: 2

      As if a life lived under an authoritarian yoke is not a disaster.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:OK boys by Johann+Lau · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I was asked to make this address I wondered what I had to say to you boys who are graduating. And I think I have one thing to say. If you wish to be useful, never take a course that will silence you. Refuse to learn anything that implies collusion, whether it be a clerkship or a curacy, a legal fee or a post in a university. Retain the power of speech no matter what other power you may lose. If you can take this course, and in so far as you take it, you will bless this country. In so far as you depart from this course, you become dampers, mutes, and hooded executioners.

      As a practical matter, a mere failure to speak out upon occassions where no statement is asked or expect from you, and when the utterance of an uncalled for suspicion is odious, will often hold you to a concurrence in palpable iniquity. Try to raise a voice that will be heard from here to Albany and watch what comes forward to shut off the sound. It is not a German sergeant, nor a Russian officer of the precinct. It is a note from a friend of your father's, offering you a place at his office. This is your warning from the secret police. Why, if you any of young gentleman have a mind to make himself heard a mile off, you must make a bonfire of your reputations, and a close enemy of most men who would wish you well.

      I have seen ten years of young men who rush out into the world with their messages, and when they find how deaf the world is, they think they must save their strength and wait. They believe that after a while they will be able to get up on some little eminence from which they can make themselves heard. "In a few years," reasons one of them, "I shall have gained a standing, and then I shall use my powers for good." Next year comes and with it a strange discovery. The man has lost his horizon of thought, his ambition has evaporated; he has nothing to say. I give you this one rule of conduct. Do what you will, but speak out always. Be shunned, be hated, be ridiculed, be scared, be in doubt, but don't be gagged. The time of trial is always. Now is the appointed time.

      -- John J. Chapman, Commencement Address to the Graduating Class of Hobart College, 1900

    3. Re:OK boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lesson #1: Never, ever, get into anything related to bashing politicians. It's a free way to disaster. I'd go as far as to say "Never voice your political opinions", except maybe with your family and close friends.

      FF some 10-15 years and not even there: your 5-6 yo grandchildren may "snitch" you by simply speaking to persons outside your trust circle. Don't you dare to break your trust circle either - like divorcing or something - not if you don't plan to snitch your "soon to be your ex-spouse and political detainee" before divorce. Can tell the above for sure, as a person who lived in Eastern Europe for the first 20-something years of life.
      Would you like such a life? 'Cause if not, better forget about your advices and do something, even if the very little of always telling the truth.

    4. Re:OK boys by marcello_dl · · Score: 2

      Politicians are our servant, officially speaking. Bashing a servant should be without consequences.
      Stripping people of such right makes revolt a just moral choice. Of course revolt might be the expected response, rage becoming fuel for other immoral machinations.
      I dunno your country but here:
      Fascism 1.0 (1914-1945) is when that freedom is taken away.
      Fascism 2.0 (1945-2001) is when politicians are uniformly puppets, so bashing them is encouraged as a diversion.
      Fascism 3.0 (2001-present) is when bashing is again prohibited so that the diversion is stronger and the choice for the citizen is between direct and indirect control.
      Getting out of it requires everybody to be social, powerful, smart, moral persons (moral as in having a moral system that competes with outside control - there is no real problem if people have genuine faith in communism, fascism, atheism, religion AND live their system for themselves and not against the others).
      But that's unlikely to happen: the system can buy us off simply enabling a positive economic phase.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    5. Re:OK boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if we threatened to throw a pie at their face? Would that still result in the SWAT team storming the house? Okay, maybe it would be assault if actually carried out, and obviously threatening to kill someone goes WAY too far and probably isn't acceptable even as a joke, but we must be able to joke about some things.

      If we can't ridicule politicians, state our negative opinion, or joke about what silliness we'd do if we met them in person, then what kind of freedom do we really have?

    6. Re:OK boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is to never say you're going to kill anyone. Which is what happened. It isn't satire or opinion when you're calling for murder.

    7. Re:OK boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bashing a servant should be without consequences.

      The 1850s called. They want their morality back.

    8. Re:OK boys by stefantalpalaru · · Score: 1

      The disaster is bigger than it seems. Not only was her blog closed, the police came to her house and confiscated her desktop, laptop and everything remotely related to internet. It will be more than an year until she sees anything back. That should teach her not to make fun of our beloved supreme leader...

    9. Re:OK boys by vegiVamp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Political opinions are what runs a democracy - it is the people in the street, talking about what goes on in the state and what should be done about it. Silencing that free and open debate, as is apparently the custom in the United States, is the death of democracy and the advent of belittling leaders who 'know what is best for the people'.

      Welcome to your willing subservitude to the new tyrants.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    10. Re:OK boys by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Great quote. Thanks mate.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    11. Re:OK boys by Windwraith · · Score: 1

      Just ~30 years ago my country was deep in a tyranny. Voicing anything negative against The General could mean your death. I guess I know what I talk about.

  14. It's a strange situation by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To an outside observer, it seems that Berlusconi has stayed in politics for one primary reason - to make sure that he can keep changing laws every time there's an attempt to prosecute him for some misdeed. With that tactic, he's rendered the judiciary largely irrelevant. He owns a vast media empire, and hasn't been forced to keep his media holdings at arm's length while in office, so he's used that to prop up his political empire. The Italian Parliament doesn't seem to be able to deal with the issue. The disconnect between those in power and a good chunk of the population is very high, according to some recent news reports.

    Given his personal behavior, you have to wonder just how corrupt his government actually is, and who may have been in a position to blackmail him for favors over the last twenty years. If he'd managed to avoid sexual misconduct that seemed deplorable to his core supporters, he wouldn't be in trouble now.

    If Italy was in another part of the world, there would probably be a lot of questions about how democratic it actually is.

    1. Re:It's a strange situation by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Given his personal behavior, you have to wonder just how corrupt his government actually is, and who may have been in a position to blackmail him for favors over the last twenty years. If he'd managed to avoid sexual misconduct that seemed deplorable to his core supporters, he wouldn't be in trouble now.

      Exactly. And it's quite understandable that Berlusconi couldn't keep his hands off the extremely gorgeous 'Ruby' (Karima El Mahroug), so one can actually start wondering if he was set up here in an effort to finally get him - a bit like how Bill Clinton was set up; both leaders were known for their runaway interest in the opposite sex so it wasn't too hard to get them to fall in with both feet...

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    2. Re:It's a strange situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he'd managed to avoid sexual misconduct that seemed deplorable to his core supporters, he wouldn't be in trouble now.

      If Italy was in another part of the world, there would probably be a lot of questions about how democratic it actually is.

      Not to mention his great once-supporter, the Roman Catholic Church. Embarassing them like this was the last straw, they've already got their share of bad press with all the pedo-priests.

      If Italy was in another part of the world, there would probably be a lot of questions about how democratic it actually is.

      Yeah, for some reason geography is a big variable in the democracy equation.

    3. Re:It's a strange situation by quintesse · · Score: 1

      If Italy was in another part of the world, there would probably be a lot of questions about how democratic it actually is

      In what other part of the world would that be if not so close to the place where democracy was invented? ;)

    4. Re:It's a strange situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> To an outside observer

      To inside observers too.

      The problem is less than 50% of Italians are observers at all. Well, at least observers who are observing something other than their television.

      Believe me, it's sad watching your own country ruined by self interest of a lone person :(

    5. Re:It's a strange situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can assure you that he is in politics just to make adhoc laws for himself. There are a few websites (like the italian wikipedia) that have a list of processes he (or his companies) is/was involved and the laws he made to be pleaded not guilty (yeah, I know wikipedia isn't the truth, but in this case it is).

      I'm young so I don't know all of the past cases but I can say I still don't understand why people keeps voting him. I think it's a shame. The political situation here is quite difficult because of corruption and contrasts between parties so it is difficult for the parliament to work, but still, I really don't know why. Another problem is that left wing politics/parties are in agreement only when it comes to hating Berlusconi and the right wing parties try to make a coalition with him because that's the only way for them to win the election.

      With the latest scandals about prostitution and that stuff I think he is way out of line... I mean, I knew it was a moral-less man, but I'm really astonished by all the stories about drugs, vips and underage girls (I've seen some politicians of his party on tv news saying that the question of lowering the legal age is an open question but there are more important ones... Here it is 18).

      Even more, the attack he is carrying forward to discredit the Bench (mainly on TVs). It's really a shame. And, as usually, he is using the "legittimo impedimento" (a privilege you have if you are in the parliament to just say "wtf, I can't be present in the courtroom because I have stuff to do") to delay the processes and other legal chicanery to protect buildings of his own from being searched.

      Btw, in the past years the politicians here (both left and right winged) made laws in the spirit of the ones the P2 wanted to make... and even more. (The P2 was a lodge of important people and Berlusconi was one of them, just do a search on the Internet).

      And after all there is still people who thinks he is the "messiah", the only one who can catty Italy on.

      You know, this country sucks. They are cutting funds to high schools and universities. I'm really sad when I think about it.

    6. Re:It's a strange situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the errors, i didn't read the text after I wrote it ;) like catty instead of carry

  15. The guy is an embarrassment to whole Europe by Gonoff · · Score: 2

    It goes a little wider than that.

    He is an embarrassment to

    • Well past middle age sleazeballs
    • The whole democratic system
    • Men
    • The entire human race

    And probably a lot of other groups.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  16. He's not an alien, he's a Time Lord. by rjejr · · Score: 1

    Just call him "Master".

  17. Never? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, that's actually a pretty good idea! The flag being used to gauge wind speed I mean, not the killing part... I never would have thought of that.

    Obviously you're not a golfer.

  18. Comparing Belusconi to Mussolini? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comparing Belusconi to Mussolini? What an absolute hidious insult to Mussolini.

  19. Uh, hang on there by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "Sarah Palin's calls for violence incited her followers and real people died."

    When?

    It certainly wasn't the Giffords shooting. Jared Lee Loughner is a guy whose two favorite books were the Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf. He liked using drugs, was a religion hating atheist, was a registered Independent who usually didn't even vote, and according to his friends, would well up at anger at the very sight of George W. Bush.

    Truly, your prototypical Palin supporter.

    I know it was politically useful for Palin haters to pin Loughner on her, but that doesn't change the fact that this guy was just a paranoid, grade A random nut.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Uh, hang on there by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Well you just have to read it as two separate clauses.
      "Sarah Palin's calls for violence incited her followers" - That's true.
      "real people died." - That's also true.

      Did the first one cause the second? No.

  20. Re:Pile on more evidence that Italy is a madhouse. by tkprit · · Score: 1

    My thoughts, somewhat... maybe the esprit de la révolution has jumped the Mediterranean.

  21. "Say no more" by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    "Say no more"

    I am willing to bet that the second post in the comments section of that blog were what really worried some people. That phrase can have very different meanings, given the context of the blog post.

    1. Re:"Say no more" by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Nudge nudge, wink wink?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  22. In his favor by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Berlusconi has better taste in women than Bill Clinton.....or Obama.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:In his favor by ComfortablyAmbiguous · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, the memories. I always believed that Bill should have been impeached, not for the silly 'crimes' he was accused of, but for a serious violation of aesthetics. Gees, he was the President, couldn't he do better than that? It reflected poorly on the whole country.

    2. Re:In his favor by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      But not JFK. A president should get to nail hot chicks, but 18+ and only on his birthday.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    3. Re:In his favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Berlusconi has better taste in women than Bill Clinton.....or Obama.

      Yeah, because callgirls (remember Rubygate?) are the best a man can get. Dumbass.

    4. Re:In his favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Berlusconi has better taste in children than Bill Clinton.....or Obama.

      FTFY.

    5. Re:In his favor by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      Clinton was impeached but he was not removed from office. An impeachment is simply an indictment.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
  23. You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a little surprised that he managed to last longer than Bertie Ahern

  24. Asimov had it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Foundation Series Spoiler Follows]

    Italy is to Earth what Trantor was to the Galaxy in the Foundation Serioes -- understand the historical center that is Italy and you can understand and solve the problems of the rest of the planet.

    All the corruption, lies, money, power, politics, rich/poor, north/south divides and bullshit that is everywhere in the world, in Italy it's all there, but magnified in a kind of tragi-comedy on stage.

    e.g. in the West, is media ownership concentrated in a few people? Sure it is -- look at Murdoch and co. Does Murdoch have undue influence over our political leaders, sure he does -- but it's all a bit subtle, a quick visit to 10 Downing Street here, some money to congressional campaigns there.

    In Italy however, media concentration and political power are all conveniently tied up in a single individual -- no need for subtlety!

  25. First Lady by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Michelle Obama is definitely on the gorgeous side. Are Berlusconi's women any better?

    1. Re:First Lady by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Michelle Obama is definitely on the gorgeous side.

      Only if your taste in women runs towards heffers........

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:First Lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a lot of them are much better than obama.
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/worldnews/5406658/Silvio-Berlusconis-women-the-top-10.html?image=3

    3. Re:First Lady by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but how many has he actually boinked? Also, will they hold up as well as FLOTUS?

    4. Re:First Lady by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      A few of them look good, but most of them look like plastic surgery disasters x_x

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  26. Technical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless I missed a link, the story is low on the details that matter most to geeks. How did the Italian police seize a .com domain. The site is "http://www.savonaeponente.com/" not "http://www.savonaeponente.it". I can understand the FBI or the CIA doing the same for a US-registered domain, but was some sort of inter-government coordination at work here? Could, for example, the secret police of ${authoritarian_state} seize facebook.com (and not just block it locally) because it's fanning the flames of protests against ${hated_leader_for_life}?

    1. Re:Technical question by coerciblegerm · · Score: 1

      You really think a domain suffix ties the hands of law enforcement? The servers were in Italy, the Italian police seized the servers. Not that hard to figure out. Turn in your geek badge.

  27. Lost something in the translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps, the translation wasn't so good... but to me, it looked more like a death threat than satire. Does anyone know anything about the author? Just because the theory he espouses is crazy, doesn't mean he is not serious about it. Look at all the crazier stuff this journalist found:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2001/apr/07/society

  28. SEX by omb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Italy is different, they like sex and are not ashamed of it,

    Tolerate alternative lifestyles, eg LBGT

    Have some of the most passable/beautiful TS outside asia, and go to confession.

    Burlisconi has few problems, at his age most Italians envy him, as in the US its only the PC liberals who hate success and fun,
    and at 74 who can grudge him that.

    1. Re:SEX by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      Italy is different, they like sex and are not ashamed of it

      It doesn't seem that way in today's news:
      > Thousands of Italians took to the streets across the country Sunday to protest Berlusconi's alleged behavior toward women.
      http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/02/14/italy.berlusconi.case/index.html

    2. Re:SEX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rarely get really fed up but YOU ARE A DICKHEAD, and CNN is worse, a PC demented arsewipe.

      If you didn't get it already this is about power not sex, and a Milan prosecutor/judge can go on until they are blue in the face, the fact is that the age of consent, for girls, in Italy is 14, unless you are under 17, when it 13, unless you are a teacher when it is 16. The unwilling girl they are trying to hang Berlisconi with was just under 18, when the alleged sex happened. Good Luck with that.

      They are trying to use prostitution law but sadly, for them, can not prove penetration or payment. It is all a media play, and as I indicated most Italians would not have a problem if Mr. B screwed his way through a line of 14y+1d virgins, I do not know how I can make it clearer to you but they like IT.

      CNN is the most egregious lie machine ever and what business is it of you Yanks anyway?

  29. Better than the Average Bear --- aka Hurding Cats by omb · · Score: 1

    Ever been to Italy, it is one of the most dis-organized and wonderful places on the planet.

    And governing it is like hurding cats, Obama only has to deal with sheeple

  30. Its not strange, it just isnt American by omb · · Score: 1

    Consider Clinton, a paragon, of lying.

    How naieve and stupid can you Yanks get?

    1. Re:Its not strange, it just isnt American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? The Clinton administration was suspected of child prostitution?

      I thought that was just two consenting adults having fun with a cigar; Something everybody but the Americans themselves found largely uninteresting.

    2. Re:Its not strange, it just isnt American by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

      Lying about an affair? I don't care. Paying an underage girl for sex? That's different. That's the allegation in Italy. There are even media reports that the Mafia has compromising pictures of Berlusconi. Also, Clinton didn't run around trying to act like a paragon of virtue with a lot of support from religious conservatives.

    3. Re:Its not strange, it just isnt American by paedobear · · Score: 1

      At what point was Clinton involved in the KKK? Yes, he brushed off Byrd's past, but if that's "a leader of the KKK" then GWB is "a leader of Al-Qaeda" and Cheney "a leader in Saddam Hussein's government"

    4. Re:Its not strange, it just isnt American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, Clinton didn't run around trying to act like a paragon of virtue with a lot of support from religious conservatives.

      Perhaps GP should've mentioned a different president? One that was cheered on for lying in office, to the public?
      Hmms, would there ever have been such a president?
      </sarcasm>

      Spoiler: "W."

    5. Re:Its not strange, it just isnt American by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Clinton didn't lie. He accurately answered a question so defined by a judge to be the opposite of the vernacular. Thus, he didn't commit perjury, but anyone looking at it later could have been confused, or more likely, those who objected were the liars and Clinton was not.

    6. Re:Its not strange, it just isnt American by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No-one on the right cared about the cigar, we care that he lied - along with the fact he was an leader of the KKK at one point in time, which goes a long way to prove the liberal party's aim is to weaken minorities and keep them below the poverty line - aside from all other evidence to this ends

      Wait, WHAT? Is this serious? Ignoring for the moment the bullshit old canard about "he lied" -- he's a politician and his lips were moving. No shit he lied -- are you trying to be cute by conflating him with someone else? Duke was the KKK prick, not Clinton.

      Please give up that "we don't care about the cigar/blowjob, we care that he lied" crap. No one buys it. If you want to be a self-righteous moralizing ass-jockey, then do so, but at least be better than the politicians by owning up to it.

    7. Re:Its not strange, it just isnt American by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Oh, but you forget that perceived lies about a BJ are so, so much more horrible than lies pushing a war to avenge daddy...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  31. it started in tunisia by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    it spread to egypt

    what country in the middle east should feel the sweep of historic revolution next? algeria? jordan? yemen?

    no, that other backwards country

    italy

    seriously, what the FUCK is wrong with you italian people? why do you tolerate this joke?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it started in tunisia by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Because it's all a damned joke. The only options are to laugh or to cry. The former is easier.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:it started in tunisia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCH factors and information control.

  32. By Sending the Police by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    how could such a clown, with multiple pending trials for corruption, tax offenses, abuse of power and even child prostitution, convince the majority of the other politicians and a consistent slice of Italian people to keep him as their prime minister for almost 20 years now?

    By using the brute squad to terrorize the slightest dissent.

    1. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm Italian, so my opinion is biased :-)
      I'm not an huge fan of Mr. Berlsuconi, but I think people from other countries should be more careful expressing such strong opinions without knowing the people and the political history of a foreign country.
      Despite what you read on newspaper, Italy is a really *strong* democracy an people in Italy is very involved in politics. In every administrative or political election there are peeks of 75-80% of voting population. I guess there are only few countries in the world where this kind of political involvement is reached.
      You may also keep in mind that a lot of English-language newspapers are own by Mr. Murdoc, which is a competitor in Europe of Mr. Berlusconi in the media market.
      Italy is (at least the major part of it) a modern country, so stop please with this misinformation.
      That said, the post on SL 'forgot' to say that the journalist arrested for the article was a firearm registered possessor (in Italy is really difficult to legally own a firearm).
      So, basically, you are complaining because a woman owning a gun as been arrested because she wrote in Internet she was thinking of killing someone...
      One more point: in Italy nor the prime minister neither the parliament has any power over the police, only the 'magistratura' (which is the public prosecutor office) can emit an order of arrest.
      My 0.02€.

    2. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it is the other way round.

      A few weeks ago, a journalist wrote a piece on one of the Milanese judges who is going after Berlusconi, citing leaked documents about some old issues that costed that magistrate an internal process. Without being even investigated, the police sent by other Milanese judges swiftly seized the journalist's computers and documents (both at home and at her newspaper's office) and "searched" her in case she was hiding documents in her body cavities (she was at home, asleep, at 6AM with her husband and sons).

      This is akin having Moubarak's police knocking at your door in Egypt because you dared criticize El Baradei...

    3. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your claim is blatantly false. I live in Italy and I've never, ever seen or heard of a police squad forcing us to vote for Berlusconi. No representative of the opposition parties has been put into jail, contrary of what happens in Belarus. There may have been a bit of misbehaviour in voting where corruption is strong (Sicily, likely), but we are still swaying on the inner fringes of Democracy.
      So why is Berlusconi prime minister since 1994? The plain and simple truth is that the opposition is fas from strong, and mostly every italian would love to be like Berlusconi. Yep, that's it. Berlusconi has stripped off the deontological veil that Italy used to wear, so while the whole world yells at Berlusconi's misdeeds by claiming that "the king is naked", it really should be "the italian people are naked".
      We voted for him, and we deserved him.
      That doesn't mean we deserve him any more, of course. He should be processed, punished, and (in our hottest, impossible dreams) imprisoned. Anyone is better than such an extreme, outrageous caricature of an italian that he is.

    4. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. brainwashed people voting for their designated media controlling overlord sure sounds like democracy to me. I bet the people in China say exactly the same.

    5. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, I can assure you it is by controlling the medias and saying bigger and bigger lies, so that people can still believe them.

    6. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod the parent down as troll. I am Italian and there have been no acts of violence against protesters, apart from little skirmishes in large manifestations.
      Italy is a democracy and thinking that Berlusconi's success has anything to do with violence is missing the point entirely.

    7. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

    8. Re:By Sending the Police by wsapplegate · · Score: 1

      Like the AC above, I hold Italian citizenship (amongst others, so I may be a bit less biased, though), and I think I can say without a doubt that I wish Berlusconi would be sent away (the nearest galaxy would be a tolerable distance in my eyes). Still, I've to agree with him: Your analysis shows that you never went to Italy, and never had a serious look at it over the usual stereotypes. The “brute squad” was maybe used by Mussolini in the 30s, and there's has been an ugly period of leftist (and not-so-leftist: Gladio, anyone?) terrorism in the seventies, but to imply that Berlusconi can actually unleash thugs against opponents just bewilders me. Instead of inventing mob squads going around like in some weird African country, people would be better advised to have a look at some less violent but still disturbing events. For instance, the number of break-ins by mysterious “thieves” into judges and photographers' offices (some sources for Italian readers: 1, 2). Just sayin'...

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    9. Re:By Sending the Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By ignoring tax evasion and such, and making a mockery of the law, so that people think that breaking the law is a normal thing to do, that it's the cunning thing to do, while people who follow the law are "idiots" (his own words!)

  33. Looks like things may be turning on him by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

    Larger protests - may be picking up steam?

    http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/13/a-bad-day-for-sultan.html

  34. Satire? by Zorque · · Score: 1

    If I had said it, I would have meant it. It sounds less like a joke and more like good policy to kill such a horrible person.

  35. Stupid, but still by Fallingwater · · Score: 2

    Quoting from the text:

    "Oggi, però, mi accordo di desiderare, dal profondo del cuore, la morte di Silvio Berlusconi .
    Non solo: ***mi sento proprio disposta ad andarlo a far fuori personalmente.***"

    The asterisked part translates to "I am ready to go kill him myself".
    Now granted, the rest of the blog post is obviously satyrical and even thinking this person actually wants to go kill the dude (whom I intensely dislike, by the way) is insane, but the fact is, she did violate the law by stating this. It's still ridiculous that the blog was seized when any search for "kill berlusconi" will reveal that if someone did off the man half of italy would welcome his death and dance on his grave, but you can't technically fault the police for their actions.

    Still and all, the only thing seizing the blog will accomplish is to make the attempt at censorship more widely known via your friend the Streisand effect.

  36. In America by tim_dion · · Score: 1

    In America we have a constitutionally protected right to say, "Kill president ...........NO CARRIER*&^%&^%

  37. Missing option by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about the conditions in Italy, I hardly speak any Italian, but in some other countries people get elected, not because they are the best for the job, or even slightly good, but just because they are somewhat better than the alternatives.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:Missing option by JockTroll · · Score: 1

      Which sadly happens to be the case with Italy. The opposition seems to have no other program than "we're not him" or "we have to remove him from power". Italians are pretty much pragmatic and they elected Berlusconi more than once because he is a crook but they believe he'll be doing their interests as well as his own. The PD (Partito Democratico), which is the opposition, has not addressed any of the problems Italy faces (massive uncontrolled immigration, unemployment, crime, reduced living standards). They're pretty much Tea Partying and offering nothing. Italy is ill-suited to the two-party system, it fared far better with coalitions but that's a thing of the past now. Mandatory: and those who don't understand this are loserboy nerds. We will grab them by their scrawny necks, bash their heads against walls, beat them up and shit on their faces.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  38. Stuck in my head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the war is over, Mussolini's dead
    He wants to get to Heaven with a crown upon his head
    The Lord says no, he's got to stay below
    All dressed up, and nowhere to go.

  39. Also it is the same as with normal people by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    While a normal citizen doesn't have a security force dedicated to their safety, the laws regarding threatening to kill them are the same. In particular it is illegal to threaten to kill someone or to tell someone else to kill them.

    So if I threaten to kill you, that is illegal. I can go to jail just for that. I don't have to take any actual action, just to make a threat against your life.

    However it has to be an actual threat, or a command to someone else, not just a joke or a statement of opinion. If you beat me at a video game and I lightheartedly say "Sometimes I want to kill you," that is a joke, and is protected speech.

  40. Answers itself. by Hasai · · Score: 2

    "Otherwise, how could such a clown, with multiple pending trials for corruption, tax offenses, abuse of power and even child prostitution, convince the majority of the other politicians and a consistent slice of Italian people to keep him as their prime minister for almost 20 years now?"

    Highlighted the answer for you.

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

    1. Re:Answers itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you knew how the electoral law works here you would understand why it is still the prime minister. Also, when I read bad things about Clinton/Bush and even Obama I don't allow myself to insult people in the way you did. Think before writing.

    2. Re:Answers itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that "consistent slice" is around 12%. People who benefit from having him around or think so.

    3. Re:Answers itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we italian people cause damage only to ourselves when we elect our head of state. Some other "enlightened" democratic countries would prefer to vote for a president who declares war to other countries for personal gain and accepts -- or witnesses, strategically avoiding any opposing move -- his own people being sacrificed in terroristic attacks just because he needs a motive. And for god's sake I now /. is US-centric but stop modding up commenters who claim that brute squads are used to terrorize dissent or that italians are dumb because they are italians! It leverages slashdot as a mediocre digg or reddit wannabe.

    4. Re:Answers itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right answer to your silly one was written centuries ago by a little known italian poet, Dante Alighieri. Virgilio to Dante:"non ti curar di loro, ma guarda e passa". I suppose you're smart enough to translate it by yourself.

      Have a nice day.

  41. Meanwhile, between the lines by jeroen94704 · · Score: 1

    "you can't feel guilty of wishing him death, because he's not human: he's an alien"

    Satire or not, that's a pretty sad worldview right there.

    I'm just saying.

    --
    He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
  42. Re:Better than the Average Bear --- aka Hurding Ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is interesting. What you are saying is very similar to a Mussolini's phrase:

    "Governing Italians isn't difficult, it's just pointless."

    I partly agree with this, but you can fully endorse it if you endorse the idea that there is a final scope in life and anything we do AND you know what it is.

    I do not endorse any of those.

  43. From The Godfather 1 by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    What keeps him in power so long?

    Sollozzo: Bene, Don Corleone. I need a man who has powerful friends. I need a million dollars in cash. I need, Don Corleone, all of those politicians that you carry around in your pocket, like so many nickels and dimes .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  44. Re:Better than the Average Bear --- aka Hurding Ca by kill-1 · · Score: 1

    Didn't you mean "hirding cats"?

  45. And exactly how does it help the satire, anyway? by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And exactly how does it help satire anyway? It seems to me like one could make a satire on the theme of Berlusconi being a mind-controlling alien without repeated and obsessive returns to how that makes it ok to kill him. Remove the incitations to killing him from it, and you still have the same satire. Well, and still not particularly funny, but adding some violent rhetoric doesn't make it any funnier, it just makes it distasteful.

    And frankly, I don't know if Palin in particular and one particular killing are linked, but the tone of political mud-slinging in the USA is not something most of us outside the USA admire. Drawing crosshairs on maps and opponents homes and all the hate rhetoric is something that adds... what? Why don't those guys and gal just say what their party will do for the voter, instead of how their opponents are traitors and need to be shot?

    And frankly, even Loughner, since you mention him, seems like a poster child for a right wingnut. Complete with stuff like not having to take "federalist" laws, ranting about the return to a gold standard, and such touching woowoo CT views as that the government mind-controls the people via neuro-linguistic programming. Yes, he was crazy and as deranged as to hold a mortal grudge over not getting the answer he wanted to a nonsense irrelevant question. But are you sure that it's ok to keep telling such nutcases that a segment of the population are traitors and need to be shot? Because it's not clear to me at all.

    By sheer virtue of having a large population, there are 2.2 million schizophrenics in the USA. (Note that I'm not picking on the USA for that. All countries have them and a 0.81% prevalence rate isn't particularly high.) Add retards, Lyme disease victims, etc, and you just have a few millions who aren't particularly good at judging stuff. Exactly what is gained by hammering into their heads that some people are traitors and need to be shot and drawing crosshairs on maps? It seems to me like it's only a matter of time until someone whose line between reality and fantasy is blurred anyway, acts upon that information.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  46. Italians want evidence, not gossip by barv · · Score: 1

    Good for the Italian electorate! Just because a bunch of weaseley liberals accuse him of all sorts of things does not mean he is guilty of anything except offending liberals. It's nice to see that ordinary Italians have enough sense to distinguish liberal lies.

  47. has to do with buiding a coal power station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she exposed personal interest way up the ladders of power in the building of a coal powered station in which major local politicians have taken bribes for