Slashdot Mirror


User: sznupi

sznupi's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,353
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,353

  1. Re:This makes journalists easy to identify. on Kuwait Bans DSLR Cameras Use For Non-Journalists · · Score: 1

    In other words - not merely looks of the photographer, also scenario fulfillment (and any hypothetical contagious shooting wouldn't help) - carrying out, under pressure, an ingrained scenario as if it was reality; despite some sensory information contradicting it.

    Good thing small digicams are getting ever more decent... (but when they will be next, in Kuwait / etc.?)

  2. Re:Russian Game: Assistance but Not Participation on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Well, you can always convince yourself that tactical systems such as Patriots are an equivalent to (briefly deployed) Safeguard Program. Or currently deployed Russian A-135 (and A-35 previously)

  3. Re:Are you kidding? on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Really, look up the situation in the 3 decades after the '53 coup... (if only then, of course)

  4. Re:FPGA users already don't care on Intel Launches Atom CPU With Integrated FPGA · · Score: 1

    It might very well burn a lot less than the same thing done in software.

  5. Re:double rainbows on Intel Launches Atom CPU With Integrated FPGA · · Score: 1
  6. Re:The real question is: why just one big incumban on The Software That Failed To Compete With Windows · · Score: 1

    Similarly, I can get behind the wheel of virtually any car and do OK because the interface is pretty standard. Ignition, gas pedal, brake pedal, steering wheel, spedometer, etc.

    Well, since most of the cars on the planet have also clutch pedal, you might be in for a little surprise... ;p

  7. Re:Naw. I understand his job. on The US-Soviet Cyber Cold War · · Score: 1

    Most people are ultimately comfortable with their worldview (even scary one) / need to largely be...supplanted, die out, for the world to improve.

  8. Re:Earth to Obama on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    It's not East Prussia, it's Kaliningrad Oblast (also Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship; elsewhere - West Pomeranian, Lubusz, Silesian and Opole ones; elsewhere again - Kresy)

    FFS, don't meddle with sanctity of European borders after WW2, we don't need this shit (oh right, Kosovo; too late...)

  9. Re:Earth to Obama on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    When their carriers will show up in the Gulf of Mexico, we should be only happy how other powers are following our example.

  10. Re:Wasn't it to be defend from Russian missiles, t on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Us here in Poland think the previous show with missile shield was moronic.

  11. Re:Russian Game: Assistance but Not Participation on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and he is far from supportive of this deal. Curious how this Russia running ends up...

  12. Re:Russian Game: Assistance but Not Participation on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Russia is the only place with fully operational nuclear missile defense technology...

  13. Re:Russian Game: Assistance but Not Participation on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Be afraid. Be very, very afraid.

  14. Re:Russian Game: Assistance but Not Participation on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    It's really curious in Poland in this regard - Russia is this old, sleazy entity not to be trusted. Somehow nobody mentions how we're the only ones who held Moscow/Kremlin for a few years. And of course popular understanding of partitions in XIX century omits how, on the Russian part, they were almost a personal union - until hardline feudal separatists frakked things up.

    (but it wasn't merely scorched earth in WW2, not close)

  15. Re:We can help you, comrade on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Resource distribution only short-term, when taking large amounts of energy and land from the past (stored in fossil fuels) or the future (spoiling the surroundings). We are above this 2.1, on average

  16. Re:Against who? on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    I wonder what would you say at some play on both sides by entities closer home...

    (those "nuclear capabilities" are fully controlled BTW, and missiles...we supplied them comparable tech)

  17. Re:Against who? on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    With Korea and Vietnam it's basically moot and arbitrary anyway - back then each side was just as bad as the other. But one was on "our side"...

    (Taliban is of course even better, with us supporting them for a long time specifically to destabilize the region / Soviet-supported governing entity...which we now support ourselves; and don't forget how US ambassador essentially gave a green light for Iraqi invasion of Kuwait)

  18. Re:Are you kidding? on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Russia has incredibly low population density, for its resources - in fact, lower than the average of the planet. Whole planet, including oceans and Antarctic.

    (that might mean the "stuff" could start happening mostly around their territory; and Russia probably still prefers to orient itself at least more with Europe than with China, of which this story might be an example - especially considering how China seems to be able to work better with Muslim world and large part of Africa)

  19. Re:Are you kidding? on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Nowadays Iran? It's a constant thing for them, with maybe some chance of breaking away from it before the 1953 coup d'etat that we supported.

  20. Re:Are you kidding? on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Russia may eventually end up becoming an ally.

    Ah, just like in the days of uncle Stalin... (well, after we dropped the idea of invading them, few years after 1920)

  21. Re:Against who? on Russia To Help NATO Build Anti-Missile Network · · Score: 1

    Most of those that you mentioned are allies right now, you know...

  22. Re:Same idea on Did an Apple Engineer Invent FB Messages In 2003? · · Score: 1

    Isn't this case of UI / "way of presenting things" patents? I'd say that visual art can easily cover such...

  23. Re:Oops on US Launches Largest Spy Satellite Ever · · Score: 1

    It was much closer to the right word when that page was written, almost 7 years ago; basically. Plus - choosing, in the meantime, to cooperate on R-7, instead of using own tech, does look like admission of something...

  24. Re:Semantics on US Launches Largest Spy Satellite Ever · · Score: 1

    The Shuttle has a bit over 100 tonnes... (it's not a single stage to orbit after all - and we probably won't really have this for some time - considering how fabulous an ordinary rocket ends up, if using technology comparable to what is required to make SSTO even barely possible)

    That gamma observatory certainly wasn't the heaviest - few years older Almaz-T was ~18.5t, Proton satellites from the 1960s already ~17t, so I guess there were quite a few heavier ones, on both sides (also, wasn't Titan IV already available during launch of Compton Observatory? Then there was Proton, and Energia was still operational - so hardly "too heavy for any rocket at the time" ;p )

  25. Re:Not spying on the US (Re:Will it...) on US Launches Largest Spy Satellite Ever · · Score: 1

    Whole of Asia, basically. And one was moved to a place apparently suited to covering western part of the EU, hm...