http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/dofexample.html
The distance between the sensor and lens on a D-SLR is greater than that on a small-sensor digicam. That affects the depth of field. The problem is that sometimes the slow shutter speed from stopping down is impractical without a tripod.
Two comments:
1. The eye is a unique system because the brain has so much post-processing behind it. I agree that your eye has incredibly fast auto-focus, however unlike a camera, you brain combines multiple images, and so in day to day life your perception of the world is that "everything" is sharp. A small sensor digicam does a better job replicating this than a larger sensor.
2. http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/DOFexample.jpg
The distance between the sensor and lens on a D-SLR is greater than that on a small-sensor digicam. The problem is that sometimes the slow shutter speed is impractical without a tripod -- that is the extra effort.
http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/DOFexample.jpg
The distance between the sensor and lens on a D-SLR is greater than that on a small-sensor digicam. The problem is that sometimes the slow shutter speed is impractical without a tripod -- that is the extra effort.
This wasn't considered/. material yet, even though it's the first article to explain that running >1GB on the Athlon64 drops you down to PC1600 bandwidth, and that the increase in latency on the P4 with >1GB of RAM produces slower real-world results than even the A64 at PC1600.
When you run 3 512MB dimms, the Athlon64 drops to PC1600 speeds. That said, the P4 drop in performance is even worse.
You really need the Opteron/Athlon 64 FX-51 to take advantage of huge amounts of memory.
Slashdot Mirror
http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/dofexample.html
http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/dofexample.html
Depth of field is affected by sensor-to-lens distance and hence DSLRs with a larger sensor have less depth of field.
Please do your research before you claim that others are wrong.
http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/dofexample.html
The distance between the sensor and lens on a D-SLR is greater than that on a small-sensor digicam. That affects the depth of field. The problem is that sometimes the slow shutter speed from stopping down is impractical without a tripod.
http://floyd.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide _04/dofexample.html
I only write the articles, I don't write the anti-leech code.
Two comments: 1. The eye is a unique system because the brain has so much post-processing behind it. I agree that your eye has incredibly fast auto-focus, however unlike a camera, you brain combines multiple images, and so in day to day life your perception of the world is that "everything" is sharp. A small sensor digicam does a better job replicating this than a larger sensor. 2. http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/DOFexample.jpg
The distance between the sensor and lens on a D-SLR is greater than that on a small-sensor digicam. The problem is that sometimes the slow shutter speed is impractical without a tripod -- that is the extra effort.
http://www.firingsquad.com/pfucata_digicam_guide_0 4/DOFexample.jpg
The distance between the sensor and lens on a D-SLR is greater than that on a small-sensor digicam. The problem is that sometimes the slow shutter speed is impractical without a tripod -- that is the extra effort.
This wasn't considered /. material yet, even though it's the first article to explain that running >1GB on the Athlon64 drops you down to PC1600 bandwidth, and that the increase in latency on the P4 with >1GB of RAM produces slower real-world results than even the A64 at PC1600.
When you run 3 512MB dimms, the Athlon64 drops to PC1600 speeds. That said, the P4 drop in performance is even worse. You really need the Opteron /Athlon 64 FX-51 to take advantage of huge amounts of memory.